neuron-inspector 0.3.2 → 0.4.0
This diff represents the content of publicly available package versions that have been released to one of the supported registries. The information contained in this diff is provided for informational purposes only and reflects changes between package versions as they appear in their respective public registries.
- package/dist/compound-tools.js +307 -0
- package/dist/compound-tools.js.map +1 -1
- package/dist/monitor.d.ts +9 -0
- package/dist/monitor.js +449 -0
- package/dist/monitor.js.map +1 -0
- package/dist/scheduler.d.ts +9 -0
- package/dist/scheduler.js +361 -0
- package/dist/scheduler.js.map +1 -0
- package/dist/server.js +110 -41
- package/dist/server.js.map +1 -1
- package/dist/session-state.d.ts +3 -0
- package/dist/session-state.js +271 -0
- package/dist/session-state.js.map +1 -0
- package/package.json +1 -1
- package/recipes/content-repurposing/agent.md +821 -0
- package/recipes/content-repurposing/learnings.md +552 -0
- package/recipes/content-repurposing/recipe.yaml +166 -0
- package/recipes/email-outreach/agent.md +335 -0
- package/recipes/email-outreach/learnings.md +94 -0
- package/recipes/email-outreach/recipe.yaml +109 -0
|
@@ -0,0 +1,552 @@
|
|
|
1
|
+
# Content Repurposing — Initial Learnings
|
|
2
|
+
|
|
3
|
+
This file tracks what we know (and learn over time) about effective content repurposing across platforms.
|
|
4
|
+
|
|
5
|
+
Last updated: 2026-09-05
|
|
6
|
+
|
|
7
|
+
---
|
|
8
|
+
|
|
9
|
+
## Starting Assumptions
|
|
10
|
+
|
|
11
|
+
These are the best practices we're starting with, before real data comes in.
|
|
12
|
+
|
|
13
|
+
### Best Source → Target Pairs
|
|
14
|
+
|
|
15
|
+
#### High Confidence (Likely to work well)
|
|
16
|
+
|
|
17
|
+
1. **X thread → LinkedIn post**
|
|
18
|
+
- Why: LinkedIn rewards depth, X forces conciseness. Expanding compressed insight into full narrative fits LinkedIn's format perfectly.
|
|
19
|
+
- Success indicators: Threads with clear frameworks, personal lessons, or technical breakdowns.
|
|
20
|
+
- Avoid: Hot takes, memes, purely reactive content.
|
|
21
|
+
|
|
22
|
+
2. **Blog post → X thread**
|
|
23
|
+
- Why: Long-form content contains multiple insights. Threading creates natural structure.
|
|
24
|
+
- Success indicators: How-to content, listicles, frameworks, step-by-step guides.
|
|
25
|
+
- Avoid: Highly technical posts with lots of code (doesn't thread well), narrative essays (lose flow).
|
|
26
|
+
|
|
27
|
+
3. **Instagram reel → TikTok video**
|
|
28
|
+
- Why: Same format, similar audiences, content can cross directly.
|
|
29
|
+
- Success indicators: Trending audio, relatable content, strong hook in first 2 seconds.
|
|
30
|
+
- Avoid: Branded content (feels like ad repurpose), overly polished (TikTok wants authentic).
|
|
31
|
+
|
|
32
|
+
4. **X viral post → Instagram graphic**
|
|
33
|
+
- Why: High-engagement text can become shareable visual content.
|
|
34
|
+
- Success indicators: Quotes, insights, surprising stats, contrarian takes.
|
|
35
|
+
- Avoid: Time-sensitive news, inside jokes, X-specific references.
|
|
36
|
+
|
|
37
|
+
#### Medium Confidence (Might work)
|
|
38
|
+
|
|
39
|
+
1. **LinkedIn post → X thread**
|
|
40
|
+
- Why: Can compress long-form into punchy insights.
|
|
41
|
+
- Risk: LinkedIn tone doesn't always translate. Needs significant re-writing.
|
|
42
|
+
- Success indicators: Data-heavy posts, clear frameworks, step-by-step advice.
|
|
43
|
+
|
|
44
|
+
2. **YouTube video → Blog post**
|
|
45
|
+
- Why: Transcribe and edit into written form for different audience.
|
|
46
|
+
- Risk: Spoken word doesn't always read well. Requires heavy editing.
|
|
47
|
+
- Success indicators: Educational content, tutorials, interviews.
|
|
48
|
+
|
|
49
|
+
3. **TikTok trend → Instagram reel**
|
|
50
|
+
- Why: Cross-pollinate trending content.
|
|
51
|
+
- Risk: Instagram audiences often 1-2 weeks behind TikTok trends. Timing matters.
|
|
52
|
+
- Success indicators: Evergreen trends (not fleeting memes).
|
|
53
|
+
|
|
54
|
+
#### Low Confidence (Risky)
|
|
55
|
+
|
|
56
|
+
1. **LinkedIn article → TikTok video**
|
|
57
|
+
- Why: Tone mismatch. Professional thought leadership rarely translates to casual short video.
|
|
58
|
+
- When it works: Personal storytelling angle exists, can visualize with b-roll.
|
|
59
|
+
|
|
60
|
+
2. **TikTok video → LinkedIn post**
|
|
61
|
+
- Why: Format and tone mismatch.
|
|
62
|
+
- When it works: Behind-the-scenes of professional work, day-in-the-life for career content.
|
|
63
|
+
|
|
64
|
+
3. **X hot take → Facebook post**
|
|
65
|
+
- Why: Facebook engagement has declined for text posts, different algorithm.
|
|
66
|
+
- When it works: Community-specific content, local news, event-based.
|
|
67
|
+
|
|
68
|
+
### What to Preserve vs. What to Change
|
|
69
|
+
|
|
70
|
+
#### Always Preserve
|
|
71
|
+
|
|
72
|
+
1. **Core insight** — the reason the original content was valuable
|
|
73
|
+
2. **Data points** — numbers, stats, specific examples
|
|
74
|
+
3. **Author credibility** — expertise signals, experience markers
|
|
75
|
+
4. **Call to action** — if the original had one, adapt it to target platform
|
|
76
|
+
5. **Brand voice** — if repurposing your own content, maintain consistency
|
|
77
|
+
|
|
78
|
+
#### Always Change
|
|
79
|
+
|
|
80
|
+
1. **Platform-specific language**
|
|
81
|
+
- X: No "I'm excited to share" (LinkedIn-speak)
|
|
82
|
+
- LinkedIn: No "ratio" or "W" (X-speak)
|
|
83
|
+
- TikTok: No corporate jargon
|
|
84
|
+
- Instagram: No walls of text
|
|
85
|
+
|
|
86
|
+
2. **Format conventions**
|
|
87
|
+
- Length (280 chars vs 1300 vs caption vs thread)
|
|
88
|
+
- Media aspect ratio (1:1 vs 4:5 vs 9:16)
|
|
89
|
+
- Structure (single post vs thread vs carousel)
|
|
90
|
+
|
|
91
|
+
3. **Tone formality**
|
|
92
|
+
- X: Fast, sharp, opinionated
|
|
93
|
+
- LinkedIn: Thoughtful, professional, personal
|
|
94
|
+
- TikTok: Casual, self-aware, playful
|
|
95
|
+
- Instagram: Aspirational, lifestyle-oriented
|
|
96
|
+
|
|
97
|
+
4. **Hashtag strategy**
|
|
98
|
+
- X: Minimal (1-2 max)
|
|
99
|
+
- LinkedIn: Selective (3-5 relevant)
|
|
100
|
+
- Instagram: Generous (8-15 mix of popular and niche)
|
|
101
|
+
- TikTok: Trending-focused (3-5)
|
|
102
|
+
|
|
103
|
+
5. **Visual style**
|
|
104
|
+
- LinkedIn: Clean, professional graphics
|
|
105
|
+
- Instagram: High-quality, aesthetic, branded
|
|
106
|
+
- TikTok: Raw, authentic, trend-participating
|
|
107
|
+
- X: Flexible, but lean toward screenshots and data viz
|
|
108
|
+
|
|
109
|
+
#### Situational (Depends on content)
|
|
110
|
+
|
|
111
|
+
1. **Attribution**
|
|
112
|
+
- Preserve if educational/informative content
|
|
113
|
+
- Remove if adapting a style/format rather than specific insight
|
|
114
|
+
|
|
115
|
+
2. **Examples**
|
|
116
|
+
- Keep if platform-agnostic
|
|
117
|
+
- Change if platform-specific (e.g., X UI example won't work on LinkedIn)
|
|
118
|
+
|
|
119
|
+
3. **Humor**
|
|
120
|
+
- Keep if it survives tone shift
|
|
121
|
+
- Remove if it's platform-specific (LinkedIn doesn't do X's irony well)
|
|
122
|
+
|
|
123
|
+
4. **Personal details**
|
|
124
|
+
- Keep if it adds authenticity
|
|
125
|
+
- Remove if it doesn't fit target platform norms
|
|
126
|
+
|
|
127
|
+
---
|
|
128
|
+
|
|
129
|
+
## Adaptation Principles
|
|
130
|
+
|
|
131
|
+
### 1. Match Platform Intent
|
|
132
|
+
|
|
133
|
+
Each platform has a dominant user intent:
|
|
134
|
+
|
|
135
|
+
- **X:** What's happening now? What do smart people think about this?
|
|
136
|
+
- **LinkedIn:** What should I know professionally? What can I learn from others' experiences?
|
|
137
|
+
- **Instagram:** What's beautiful/aspirational/relatable? What lifestyle do I want?
|
|
138
|
+
- **TikTok:** What's entertaining/trendy/authentic right now?
|
|
139
|
+
- **Facebook:** What's happening in my community? What do my friends care about?
|
|
140
|
+
|
|
141
|
+
Your adaptation should align with that intent.
|
|
142
|
+
|
|
143
|
+
**Example:**
|
|
144
|
+
- Original (X): "AI pricing is broken. Companies charge per token but users think in outcomes."
|
|
145
|
+
- LinkedIn adaptation: "I've analyzed 50+ AI product pricing models. Here's why most will fail in the next 18 months..." [expand into thought leadership]
|
|
146
|
+
- Instagram adaptation: Card graphic with quote "AI pricing is broken" + visual breakdown of token vs outcome pricing
|
|
147
|
+
- TikTok adaptation: "Story time: I tried to explain API pricing to my mom and realized the entire AI industry has a UX problem" [casual, storytelling angle]
|
|
148
|
+
|
|
149
|
+
### 2. Respect Platform Length Culture
|
|
150
|
+
|
|
151
|
+
Don't fight the platform's natural length preference:
|
|
152
|
+
|
|
153
|
+
- **X:** If it doesn't fit in 280 chars, thread it. If it doesn't thread well, it's not X content.
|
|
154
|
+
- **LinkedIn:** 1300 chars is the sweet spot. Shorter feels incomplete. Longer gets truncated.
|
|
155
|
+
- **Instagram:** Caption should support the visual, not replace it. 150-300 words.
|
|
156
|
+
- **TikTok:** Caption is secondary to video. 1-2 sentences max.
|
|
157
|
+
|
|
158
|
+
**Bad repurposing:** Taking a 1200-word LinkedIn post and cramming it into a single X post. It feels rushed and incomplete.
|
|
159
|
+
|
|
160
|
+
**Good repurposing:** Taking the same post and extracting 5-7 key insights, each becoming a tweet in a thread.
|
|
161
|
+
|
|
162
|
+
### 3. Adapt Engagement Mechanisms
|
|
163
|
+
|
|
164
|
+
Each platform has different engagement triggers:
|
|
165
|
+
|
|
166
|
+
- **X:** Retweets, quote tweets, replies. Users engage by amplifying or debating.
|
|
167
|
+
- **LinkedIn:** Comments, shares. Users engage by adding their perspective.
|
|
168
|
+
- **Instagram:** Saves, shares to story, DMs. Users engage by bookmarking and forwarding.
|
|
169
|
+
- **TikTok:** Duets, stitches, comments. Users engage by remixing.
|
|
170
|
+
|
|
171
|
+
Your CTA should match the platform's engagement style:
|
|
172
|
+
|
|
173
|
+
- **X:** "Thoughts?" "RT if you agree" "Reply with your take"
|
|
174
|
+
- **LinkedIn:** "What's been your experience with this?" "Curious to hear other perspectives"
|
|
175
|
+
- **Instagram:** "Save this for later" "Share with someone who needs this" "Tag a friend"
|
|
176
|
+
- **TikTok:** "Duet this with your version" "Stitch and tell me I'm wrong"
|
|
177
|
+
|
|
178
|
+
### 4. Timing Matters
|
|
179
|
+
|
|
180
|
+
**When to repurpose:**
|
|
181
|
+
|
|
182
|
+
- **Immediate (same day):** If the insight is evergreen and platforms don't overlap much (e.g., X → LinkedIn)
|
|
183
|
+
- **1-2 days later:** If platforms have some audience overlap, let the original content peak first
|
|
184
|
+
- **1 week later:** If repurposing viral/trending content, wait for it to age out on source platform
|
|
185
|
+
- **Never:** If content is time-sensitive news that will be stale on target platform
|
|
186
|
+
|
|
187
|
+
**Time of day:** Match target platform's peak hours, not source platform's.
|
|
188
|
+
|
|
189
|
+
- X: 8-10am, 5-7pm (commute times)
|
|
190
|
+
- LinkedIn: 7-9am, 12-1pm (work hours)
|
|
191
|
+
- Instagram: 11am-1pm, 7-9pm (lunch and evening)
|
|
192
|
+
- TikTok: 6-9pm, 9-11pm (evening leisure)
|
|
193
|
+
|
|
194
|
+
### 5. Don't Lazy Repurpose
|
|
195
|
+
|
|
196
|
+
Bad repurposing is obvious:
|
|
197
|
+
|
|
198
|
+
- Screenshot of X thread posted to LinkedIn with caption "Thoughts?" (zero effort)
|
|
199
|
+
- Copy-paste with different hashtags (no adaptation)
|
|
200
|
+
- Instagram post to Facebook with no changes (cross-post, not repurpose)
|
|
201
|
+
|
|
202
|
+
Good repurposing is invisible:
|
|
203
|
+
|
|
204
|
+
- Audience on each platform thinks the content was created specifically for them
|
|
205
|
+
- Tone, length, format all feel native
|
|
206
|
+
- Media is optimized for the platform (not just resized)
|
|
207
|
+
|
|
208
|
+
If someone follows you on both platforms, they should see two different expressions of the same idea, not the same content twice.
|
|
209
|
+
|
|
210
|
+
---
|
|
211
|
+
|
|
212
|
+
## Content Type Repurpose-ability
|
|
213
|
+
|
|
214
|
+
### High Repurpose-ability
|
|
215
|
+
|
|
216
|
+
1. **Frameworks and models**
|
|
217
|
+
- Why: Platform-agnostic, visual-friendly, evergreen
|
|
218
|
+
- Best targets: All platforms (adapt format)
|
|
219
|
+
- Example: "3 types of startup risk" works as X thread, LinkedIn post, IG carousel, TikTok video
|
|
220
|
+
|
|
221
|
+
2. **Personal lessons/experiences**
|
|
222
|
+
- Why: Storytelling adapts well across platforms
|
|
223
|
+
- Best targets: X → LinkedIn, Blog → X thread, TikTok → Instagram
|
|
224
|
+
- Example: "I failed my first startup" can be expanded for LinkedIn, threaded for X, told casually for TikTok
|
|
225
|
+
|
|
226
|
+
3. **How-to and tutorials**
|
|
227
|
+
- Why: Educational content has demand everywhere
|
|
228
|
+
- Best targets: Blog → X thread, YouTube → Blog, X thread → LinkedIn
|
|
229
|
+
- Example: "How to negotiate your salary" works everywhere with tone adjustment
|
|
230
|
+
|
|
231
|
+
4. **Data and research**
|
|
232
|
+
- Why: Surprising stats are shareable across platforms
|
|
233
|
+
- Best targets: Blog → X + LinkedIn + IG graphic, Research report → Twitter thread
|
|
234
|
+
- Example: "Users spend 80% of time on 20% of features" — works everywhere
|
|
235
|
+
|
|
236
|
+
### Medium Repurpose-ability
|
|
237
|
+
|
|
238
|
+
1. **Opinion pieces and takes**
|
|
239
|
+
- Why: Tone is hard to translate, some platforms don't reward pure opinion
|
|
240
|
+
- Best targets: X → LinkedIn (if you add context), Blog → X (if you sharpen)
|
|
241
|
+
- Risk: Hot takes don't age well, controversial content might not fit all platforms
|
|
242
|
+
|
|
243
|
+
2. **News and current events**
|
|
244
|
+
- Why: Time-sensitive, some platforms lag behind
|
|
245
|
+
- Best targets: X → Instagram (if you visualize), X → LinkedIn (if you analyze)
|
|
246
|
+
- Risk: Stale content performs poorly
|
|
247
|
+
|
|
248
|
+
3. **Behind-the-scenes content**
|
|
249
|
+
- Why: Works for some industries/niches, not all
|
|
250
|
+
- Best targets: Instagram → TikTok, TikTok → Instagram
|
|
251
|
+
- Risk: Professional audiences (LinkedIn) might not care about BTS of your daily routine
|
|
252
|
+
|
|
253
|
+
### Low Repurpose-ability
|
|
254
|
+
|
|
255
|
+
1. **Memes and platform-specific humor**
|
|
256
|
+
- Why: Context doesn't translate, inside jokes fail
|
|
257
|
+
- When it works: Only if the meme format is universal
|
|
258
|
+
- Example: X meme format rarely works on LinkedIn
|
|
259
|
+
|
|
260
|
+
2. **Highly technical deep-dives**
|
|
261
|
+
- Why: Can't compress without losing value, visual adaptation is hard
|
|
262
|
+
- When it works: If you extract one insight and expand on it
|
|
263
|
+
- Example: 5000-word technical post won't thread well, but one section might
|
|
264
|
+
|
|
265
|
+
3. **Real-time commentary**
|
|
266
|
+
- Why: Loses relevance quickly, platforms have different news cycles
|
|
267
|
+
- When it works: If you add analysis/takeaways that outlast the news
|
|
268
|
+
- Example: Live-tweeting an event won't repurpose well, but your summary might
|
|
269
|
+
|
|
270
|
+
---
|
|
271
|
+
|
|
272
|
+
## Platform-Specific Considerations
|
|
273
|
+
|
|
274
|
+
### X (Twitter)
|
|
275
|
+
|
|
276
|
+
**What works here:**
|
|
277
|
+
- Fast takes, sharp insights, threads
|
|
278
|
+
- News, hot takes, industry commentary
|
|
279
|
+
- Data visualizations, screenshots, charts
|
|
280
|
+
- Humor, wit, concise storytelling
|
|
281
|
+
|
|
282
|
+
**What doesn't:**
|
|
283
|
+
- Long-form narrative (use threads or link out)
|
|
284
|
+
- Polished marketing speak (feels inauthentic)
|
|
285
|
+
- Corporate announcements (unless you're a brand account)
|
|
286
|
+
|
|
287
|
+
**Repurposing from X:**
|
|
288
|
+
- Expand threads into LinkedIn posts or blog posts
|
|
289
|
+
- Visualize popular tweets into Instagram graphics
|
|
290
|
+
- Turn viral threads into newsletter content
|
|
291
|
+
|
|
292
|
+
**Repurposing to X:**
|
|
293
|
+
- Compress long-form into threads
|
|
294
|
+
- Extract the most surprising insight from data
|
|
295
|
+
- Sharpen the hook, remove fluff
|
|
296
|
+
|
|
297
|
+
### LinkedIn
|
|
298
|
+
|
|
299
|
+
**What works here:**
|
|
300
|
+
- Professional insights, career lessons, industry analysis
|
|
301
|
+
- Personal stories with professional takeaways
|
|
302
|
+
- Thought leadership, frameworks, how-to content
|
|
303
|
+
- Company/team wins (product launches, hiring)
|
|
304
|
+
|
|
305
|
+
**What doesn't:**
|
|
306
|
+
- Memes (unless very relevant and high-quality)
|
|
307
|
+
- Purely personal content (vacation photos)
|
|
308
|
+
- Hard sales pitches (engagement killer)
|
|
309
|
+
|
|
310
|
+
**Repurposing from LinkedIn:**
|
|
311
|
+
- Compress into X threads (extract key insights)
|
|
312
|
+
- Turn into blog posts (expand with more detail)
|
|
313
|
+
- Create IG graphics (visualize frameworks)
|
|
314
|
+
|
|
315
|
+
**Repurposing to LinkedIn:**
|
|
316
|
+
- Expand X threads with personal context
|
|
317
|
+
- Add professional framing to blog content
|
|
318
|
+
- Humanize data with your experience
|
|
319
|
+
|
|
320
|
+
### Instagram
|
|
321
|
+
|
|
322
|
+
**What works here:**
|
|
323
|
+
- Visual-first content (photos, reels, carousels)
|
|
324
|
+
- Lifestyle, behind-the-scenes, personal brand
|
|
325
|
+
- Educational carousels (swipe-through how-tos)
|
|
326
|
+
- Aspirational content, before/after, transformations
|
|
327
|
+
|
|
328
|
+
**What doesn't:**
|
|
329
|
+
- Text-heavy posts (caption can support, not replace visual)
|
|
330
|
+
- Corporate content without human element
|
|
331
|
+
- Low-quality visuals (Instagram is aesthetic-driven)
|
|
332
|
+
|
|
333
|
+
**Repurposing from Instagram:**
|
|
334
|
+
- Turn reels into TikTok videos
|
|
335
|
+
- Pull quotes from captions for X posts
|
|
336
|
+
- Expand carousel topics into blog posts
|
|
337
|
+
|
|
338
|
+
**Repurposing to Instagram:**
|
|
339
|
+
- Visualize X threads into carousel posts
|
|
340
|
+
- Screenshot blog quotes with branded design
|
|
341
|
+
- Turn data into infographic posts
|
|
342
|
+
|
|
343
|
+
### TikTok
|
|
344
|
+
|
|
345
|
+
**What works here:**
|
|
346
|
+
- Authentic, casual, relatable video
|
|
347
|
+
- Trend participation (sounds, formats, challenges)
|
|
348
|
+
- Storytelling, day-in-the-life, tutorials
|
|
349
|
+
- Entertainment-first, education-second
|
|
350
|
+
|
|
351
|
+
**What doesn't:**
|
|
352
|
+
- Overly polished, corporate content
|
|
353
|
+
- Long setups (hook in first 2 seconds or lose them)
|
|
354
|
+
- Text-heavy content (this is video platform)
|
|
355
|
+
|
|
356
|
+
**Repurposing from TikTok:**
|
|
357
|
+
- Cross-post to Instagram Reels
|
|
358
|
+
- Transcribe and expand into blog posts
|
|
359
|
+
- Pull quotes for X posts
|
|
360
|
+
|
|
361
|
+
**Repurposing to TikTok:**
|
|
362
|
+
- Turn blog how-tos into quick tutorial videos
|
|
363
|
+
- Adapt Instagram reels (but change caption/sound)
|
|
364
|
+
- Film yourself reading/reacting to your own written content
|
|
365
|
+
|
|
366
|
+
### Facebook
|
|
367
|
+
|
|
368
|
+
**What works here:**
|
|
369
|
+
- Community content, local news, events
|
|
370
|
+
- Long-form storytelling (Facebook still supports this)
|
|
371
|
+
- Video content (Facebook pushes video hard)
|
|
372
|
+
- Group-specific content (niche communities)
|
|
373
|
+
|
|
374
|
+
**What doesn't:**
|
|
375
|
+
- Generic text posts (engagement is down)
|
|
376
|
+
- Content without community angle
|
|
377
|
+
- Pure reshares from other platforms
|
|
378
|
+
|
|
379
|
+
**Repurposing from Facebook:**
|
|
380
|
+
- Turn long posts into blog posts or LinkedIn articles
|
|
381
|
+
- Extract insights for X threads
|
|
382
|
+
- Repurpose community questions into educational content
|
|
383
|
+
|
|
384
|
+
**Repurposing to Facebook:**
|
|
385
|
+
- Share blog posts with community context
|
|
386
|
+
- Adapt LinkedIn thought pieces for niche groups
|
|
387
|
+
- Cross-post video content from other platforms
|
|
388
|
+
|
|
389
|
+
---
|
|
390
|
+
|
|
391
|
+
## Quality Signals (When to Repurpose)
|
|
392
|
+
|
|
393
|
+
Not all content deserves repurposing. Here's what to look for:
|
|
394
|
+
|
|
395
|
+
### High Signal (Repurpose This)
|
|
396
|
+
|
|
397
|
+
1. **Engagement above baseline**
|
|
398
|
+
- Source content is performing 2x+ your average
|
|
399
|
+
- Comments indicate the insight resonated
|
|
400
|
+
- Shares suggest it has reach potential
|
|
401
|
+
|
|
402
|
+
2. **Evergreen insight**
|
|
403
|
+
- Not time-sensitive news
|
|
404
|
+
- Not dependent on current events
|
|
405
|
+
- Will be relevant in 6 months
|
|
406
|
+
|
|
407
|
+
3. **Clear core value**
|
|
408
|
+
- You can explain in one sentence why this content matters
|
|
409
|
+
- It teaches something, shares an insight, or tells a story
|
|
410
|
+
- It's not just filler or engagement bait
|
|
411
|
+
|
|
412
|
+
4. **Cross-platform potential**
|
|
413
|
+
- The insight isn't platform-specific
|
|
414
|
+
- You can see how to adapt tone/format for other platforms
|
|
415
|
+
- The content type translates (not too format-dependent)
|
|
416
|
+
|
|
417
|
+
### Medium Signal (Maybe Repurpose)
|
|
418
|
+
|
|
419
|
+
1. **Moderate engagement**
|
|
420
|
+
- Performing at your average, not above
|
|
421
|
+
- Some comments, but not overwhelming response
|
|
422
|
+
- Could perform better with better packaging
|
|
423
|
+
|
|
424
|
+
2. **Niche-specific**
|
|
425
|
+
- Relevant to a specific audience segment
|
|
426
|
+
- Might work on platforms where that niche is active
|
|
427
|
+
- Requires more context for broader audience
|
|
428
|
+
|
|
429
|
+
3. **Time-sensitive but not stale**
|
|
430
|
+
- Related to current trend, but insight outlasts the trend
|
|
431
|
+
- News-adjacent, but the takeaway is evergreen
|
|
432
|
+
- Can be reframed to remove time-sensitivity
|
|
433
|
+
|
|
434
|
+
### Low Signal (Don't Repurpose)
|
|
435
|
+
|
|
436
|
+
1. **Low engagement**
|
|
437
|
+
- Below your baseline
|
|
438
|
+
- Few reactions, no comments
|
|
439
|
+
- Signal that the insight didn't land
|
|
440
|
+
|
|
441
|
+
2. **Highly platform-specific**
|
|
442
|
+
- Inside jokes, memes, platform dynamics
|
|
443
|
+
- Won't make sense outside the source platform
|
|
444
|
+
- Format is too tied to the platform
|
|
445
|
+
|
|
446
|
+
3. **Filler content**
|
|
447
|
+
- Posted just to maintain presence
|
|
448
|
+
- No strong insight or value
|
|
449
|
+
- Repurposing won't improve it
|
|
450
|
+
|
|
451
|
+
4. **Already saturated**
|
|
452
|
+
- Everyone is talking about this
|
|
453
|
+
- Your take isn't unique enough
|
|
454
|
+
- Better to create new content than join the pile-on
|
|
455
|
+
|
|
456
|
+
---
|
|
457
|
+
|
|
458
|
+
## Success Metrics
|
|
459
|
+
|
|
460
|
+
How to evaluate if repurposing is working:
|
|
461
|
+
|
|
462
|
+
### Immediate Metrics (First 48 hours)
|
|
463
|
+
|
|
464
|
+
- **Engagement rate:** Target engagement > 50% of source engagement
|
|
465
|
+
- **Reach:** Target reach > 30% of source reach (accounting for different follower counts)
|
|
466
|
+
- **Quality of engagement:** Comments that show understanding, not just reactions
|
|
467
|
+
- **Saves/shares:** Indicates the content has utility beyond single view
|
|
468
|
+
|
|
469
|
+
### Medium-term Metrics (1-2 weeks)
|
|
470
|
+
|
|
471
|
+
- **Follow growth:** Did repurposed content bring new followers on target platform?
|
|
472
|
+
- **Profile visits:** Are people discovering you through repurposed content?
|
|
473
|
+
- **Link clicks:** If you linked to original source, are people exploring?
|
|
474
|
+
- **Conversation quality:** Did it start meaningful discussions?
|
|
475
|
+
|
|
476
|
+
### Long-term Metrics (Monthly)
|
|
477
|
+
|
|
478
|
+
- **Content efficiency:** Repurposing 1 piece into 3 platforms = 3x content output
|
|
479
|
+
- **Platform balance:** Are you growing on multiple platforms, not just one?
|
|
480
|
+
- **Compounding value:** Are repurposed pieces finding new audiences months later?
|
|
481
|
+
- **Pattern recognition:** Which repurposing strategies consistently work?
|
|
482
|
+
|
|
483
|
+
### Red Flags (Stop Doing This)
|
|
484
|
+
|
|
485
|
+
- Repurposed content consistently underperforms original
|
|
486
|
+
- Followers on target platform complain about seeing duplicate content
|
|
487
|
+
- Engagement rate drops over time (audience fatigue)
|
|
488
|
+
- You're spending more time repurposing than creating
|
|
489
|
+
|
|
490
|
+
---
|
|
491
|
+
|
|
492
|
+
## Learnings Log
|
|
493
|
+
|
|
494
|
+
As we run this recipe, we'll track actual results here.
|
|
495
|
+
|
|
496
|
+
### Session 1 — [Date to be filled]
|
|
497
|
+
- Source platform:
|
|
498
|
+
- Target platform:
|
|
499
|
+
- Content repurposed:
|
|
500
|
+
- Results:
|
|
501
|
+
- Learnings:
|
|
502
|
+
|
|
503
|
+
### Session 2 — [Date to be filled]
|
|
504
|
+
- Source platform:
|
|
505
|
+
- Target platform:
|
|
506
|
+
- Content repurposed:
|
|
507
|
+
- Results:
|
|
508
|
+
- Learnings:
|
|
509
|
+
|
|
510
|
+
[This section will grow with real data]
|
|
511
|
+
|
|
512
|
+
---
|
|
513
|
+
|
|
514
|
+
## Anti-Patterns to Avoid
|
|
515
|
+
|
|
516
|
+
1. **Lazy cross-posting:** Just hitting "share to Facebook/X/LinkedIn" without adaptation
|
|
517
|
+
2. **Tone-deaf adaptation:** Professional content made "casual" with forced slang
|
|
518
|
+
3. **Over-repurposing:** Same content on 5 platforms = audience fatigue
|
|
519
|
+
4. **Ignoring platform trends:** Posting static images to TikTok, long threads to LinkedIn
|
|
520
|
+
5. **Forgetting attribution:** Repurposing others' content without credit
|
|
521
|
+
6. **Chasing every trend:** Not all trending content should be repurposed
|
|
522
|
+
7. **Sacrificing quality for quantity:** 10 mediocre repurposes < 2 great ones
|
|
523
|
+
|
|
524
|
+
---
|
|
525
|
+
|
|
526
|
+
## Evolution Triggers
|
|
527
|
+
|
|
528
|
+
Update this file when:
|
|
529
|
+
|
|
530
|
+
1. **After 10 repurposing sessions:** Review what worked, update "Best Pairs" section
|
|
531
|
+
2. **When engagement patterns emerge:** Add new success patterns to "Quality Signals"
|
|
532
|
+
3. **When platform changes happen:** Update platform-specific considerations
|
|
533
|
+
4. **When adaptation approaches prove successful:** Document in "Adaptation Principles"
|
|
534
|
+
5. **When failures teach lessons:** Add to "Anti-Patterns"
|
|
535
|
+
|
|
536
|
+
---
|
|
537
|
+
|
|
538
|
+
## Questions to Answer Over Time
|
|
539
|
+
|
|
540
|
+
1. Is there an optimal time gap between original post and repurpose?
|
|
541
|
+
2. Does repurposing your own high-performing content work better than repurposing others'?
|
|
542
|
+
3. Which content types have the highest ROI for repurposing effort?
|
|
543
|
+
4. Do audiences notice/care about repurposed content, or is it invisible to them?
|
|
544
|
+
5. What's the engagement drop-off curve? (Original = 100%, repurpose 1 = X%, repurpose 2 = Y%)
|
|
545
|
+
6. Is there a "best path" for content flow? (e.g., always start on X, expand to LinkedIn, visualize for IG)
|
|
546
|
+
7. How does repurposing affect overall content strategy? (More reach vs risk of repetition)
|
|
547
|
+
|
|
548
|
+
These answers will emerge from actual data.
|
|
549
|
+
|
|
550
|
+
---
|
|
551
|
+
|
|
552
|
+
**Next review:** After 10 sessions or 30 days, whichever comes first.
|