neuro-vault-mcp 5.5.0 → 5.5.3
This diff represents the content of publicly available package versions that have been released to one of the supported registries. The information contained in this diff is provided for informational purposes only and reflects changes between package versions as they appear in their respective public registries.
- package/dist/cli.js +5 -4
- package/dist/cli.js.map +1 -1
- package/package.json +1 -1
package/dist/cli.js
CHANGED
|
@@ -16330,9 +16330,10 @@ var ObsidianCLIProvider = class {
|
|
|
16330
16330
|
);
|
|
16331
16331
|
}
|
|
16332
16332
|
buildArgs(command, ...kvPairs) {
|
|
16333
|
-
|
|
16334
|
-
|
|
16335
|
-
|
|
16333
|
+
if (this.vaultName) {
|
|
16334
|
+
return [`vault=${this.vaultName}`, command, ...kvPairs];
|
|
16335
|
+
}
|
|
16336
|
+
return [command, ...kvPairs];
|
|
16336
16337
|
}
|
|
16337
16338
|
};
|
|
16338
16339
|
|
|
@@ -17066,7 +17067,7 @@ This vault is the user's personal knowledge base \u2014 planning notes, brainsto
|
|
|
17066
17067
|
|
|
17067
17068
|
You don't know on your own how the user scopes notes for the current project \u2014 the same vault is typically connected to many, and different users organise differently (a tag, a folder, a frontmatter property like \`project\`, or a combination). The user's project-level instructions should name that scope and tell you how to query for it. If they don't, you have three ways forward, in order of preference:
|
|
17068
17069
|
|
|
17069
|
-
1. **Probe the vault structure** via \`
|
|
17070
|
+
1. **Probe the vault structure** via \`get_vault_overview\` \u2014 a single-call snapshot of top-level folders with counts, top tags, frontmatter properties with inferred types, and the top-linked notes. Common conventions (a \`project\` frontmatter field, a \`Projects/\` folder, a recurring tag) usually surface immediately. Fall back to \`list_tags\`, \`list_properties\`, or exploratory \`query_notes\` only when the overview misses what you need.
|
|
17070
17071
|
2. **Use \`search_notes\`** with the project name and key concepts as a fuzzy entry point \u2014 relevant material may exist under unrelated names.
|
|
17071
17072
|
3. **Ask the user**, and the first time they save project-specific notes propose a scoping scheme so future sessions have an explicit entry point.
|
|
17072
17073
|
|