myconvergio 2.1.0

package/.claude/skills/strategic-analysis/SKILL.md

@@ -0,0 +1,338 @@
+# Strategic Analysis Skill
+
+> Reusable workflow extracted from domik-mckinsey-strategic-decision-maker expertise.
+
+## Purpose
+Apply McKinsey-level strategic analysis using MECE frameworks, hypothesis-driven problem solving, and quantitative prioritization to drive transformational business decisions with executive-ready recommendations.
+
+## When to Use
+- Strategic initiative prioritization
+- Business transformation planning
+- Technology investment decisions
+- Market entry/expansion strategy
+- Digital transformation roadmaps
+- M&A evaluation and due diligence
+- Portfolio optimization
+- Go/no-go decisions for major projects
+- Executive decision support
+
+## Workflow Steps
+
+1. **Situation Assessment**
+   - Define the strategic question clearly
+   - Understand current state and context
+   - Identify key stakeholders and their perspectives
+   - Map competitive landscape
+   - Gather relevant data and metrics
+   - Document constraints and assumptions
+
+2. **Issue Tree Construction (MECE)**
+   - Break down the strategic question into components
+   - Ensure Mutually Exclusive, Collectively Exhaustive structure
+   - Create hypothesis-driven issue tree
+   - Identify key decision drivers
+   - Prioritize branches for deep dive analysis
+
+3. **Hypothesis Formation**
+   - Formulate testable hypotheses about the answer
+   - Define what evidence would prove/disprove each
+   - Create hypothesis tree with supporting logic
+   - Identify critical assumptions
+   - Plan data collection to test hypotheses
+
+4. **Quantitative Analysis**
+   - Gather data to test hypotheses
+   - Apply ISE Prioritization Framework (if applicable)
+   - Calculate financial impact (NPV, IRR, ROI)
+   - Perform sensitivity analysis
+   - Create scenario models (best/base/worst case)
+
+5. **Qualitative Assessment**
+   - Evaluate strategic fit with company vision
+   - Assess organizational capability and readiness
+   - Consider market timing and competitive dynamics
+   - Evaluate execution risk and mitigation strategies
+   - Assess stakeholder alignment
+
+6. **Framework Application**
+   - Apply relevant strategic frameworks:
+     - Porter's Five Forces (competitive analysis)
+     - 7S Framework (organizational alignment)
+     - Three Horizons (innovation portfolio)
+     - Value Chain Analysis (competitive advantage)
+     - SWOT Analysis (strategic positioning)
+   - Synthesize insights across frameworks
+
+7. **Recommendation Development**
+   - Synthesize analysis into clear recommendation
+   - Create executive summary (three key messages)
+   - Develop implementation roadmap
+   - Identify quick wins and long-term plays
+   - Define success metrics and KPIs
+
+8. **Executive Communication**
+   - Structure as situation-complication-question-answer
+   - Lead with recommendation, support with analysis
+   - Create visual "so what" slides
+   - Prepare for objections and questions
+   - Define clear next steps with ownership
+
+## Inputs Required
+- **Strategic Question**: Clear, specific decision to be made
+- **Business Context**: Company strategy, market position, competitive landscape
+- **Financial Data**: Revenue, costs, growth rates, market size
+- **Organizational Context**: Capabilities, resources, constraints
+- **Timeline**: Decision deadline, implementation window
+- **Stakeholders**: Key decision-makers and their priorities
+
+## Outputs Produced
+- **Executive Summary**: Three key messages with recommendation
+- **Strategic Analysis Report**: Detailed issue tree and hypothesis testing
+- **Quantitative Models**: Financial projections, scenario analysis, ROI
+- **Decision Framework Scorecards**: ISE or custom scoring with justification
+- **Implementation Roadmap**: Phased plan with milestones and accountability
+- **Risk Assessment**: Key risks with mitigation strategies
+- **Presentation Deck**: Executive-ready slides for decision meeting
+
+## MECE Framework Principles
+
+### Mutually Exclusive
+- No overlap between categories
+- Each item fits in only one bucket
+- Clear boundaries between segments
+
+### Collectively Exhaustive
+- All possibilities covered
+- Nothing left out
+- Complete picture of the problem space
+
+### Example Issue Tree
+```
+Should we enter Market X?
+
+├─ Market Attractiveness (IS the opportunity good?)
+│  ├─ Market size and growth
+│  ├─ Competitive intensity
+│  └─ Profitability potential
+│
+├─ Strategic Fit (SHOULD we pursue it?)
+│  ├─ Alignment with company strategy
+│  ├─ Synergies with existing business
+│  └─ Risk profile compatibility
+│
+└─ Ability to Win (CAN we succeed?)
+   ├─ Competitive advantage
+   ├─ Required capabilities vs current state
+   └─ Resource availability and commitment
+```
+
+## ISE Prioritization Framework
+
+### Initiative-Level Assessment (1-5 scale)
+
+#### Customer Value
+- **5**: CxO-validated outcomes with precise benchmarks
+- **4**: Defined outcomes with preliminary benchmarks
+- **3**: Aspirational outcomes without clear benchmarks
+- **2**: Problem identified, outcomes vague
+- **1**: No clear problem or impact defined
+
+#### Microsoft Value (Annual NNR)
+- **5**: >$50M annual NNR
+- **4**: $20M-$50M annual NNR
+- **3**: $5M-$20M annual NNR
+- **2**: $1M-$5M annual NNR
+- **1**: <$1M annual NNR
+
+#### Ecosystem Impact
+- **5**: Microsoft-wide blueprint with PG interest
+- **4**: Multi-industry use case, strong partner enablement
+- **3**: High relevance across industry, aligned to priority use case
+- **2**: Replicable across customer segment, moderate TAM
+- **1**: Replicable to 1-2 similar customers, low TAM
+- **0**: Highly tailored, not replicable
+
+#### Technical Innovation
+- **5**: Transformational initiative co-led with PG
+- **4**: Deep frontier tech use, co-engineering with PG
+- **3**: Technically innovative, partially aligned with PG
+- **2**: Moderate complexity, some key Azure services
+- **1**: Not new, novel, or complex
+
+#### Engineering Time to Solution
+- **5**: <60 Dev Days
+- **4**: 61-199 Dev Days
+- **3**: 200-499 Dev Days
+- **2**: 500-999 Dev Days
+- **1**: >1000 Dev Days
+
+#### Time to Full Production
+- **5**: ≤2 months
+- **4**: 2-4 months
+- **3**: 4-8 months
+- **2**: 8-12 months
+- **1**: >12 months or no Azure tenant
+
+### Composite Score Calculation
+```
+Total Score = (Customer Value + Microsoft Value + Ecosystem Impact +
+               Technical Innovation + Engineering Efficiency +
+               Time to Production) / 6
+
+Interpretation:
+4.5-5.0: Strategic priority - immediate investment
+3.5-4.4: Strong candidate - detailed planning
+2.5-3.4: Conditional - requires optimization
+1.5-2.4: Deferred - not currently strategic
+<1.5: Decline - does not meet minimum criteria
+```
+
+## Executive Summary Template
+
+```markdown
+# Strategic Recommendation: [Clear Decision Title]
+
+## Recommendation
+[One sentence: What should we do?]
+
+## Three Key Messages
+1. **[First key message]** - [Why it matters]
+2. **[Second key message]** - [Supporting evidence]
+3. **[Third key message]** - [What it means]
+
+## Strategic Rationale
+[2-3 paragraphs explaining the "why" behind the recommendation]
+
+## Expected Impact
+- Financial: [Revenue/cost impact with timeframe]
+- Strategic: [Competitive advantage, market position]
+- Organizational: [Capability building, culture]
+
+## Implementation Roadmap
+- **Phase 1 (Months 1-3)**: [Quick wins, foundations]
+- **Phase 2 (Months 4-6)**: [Scale, optimization]
+- **Phase 3 (Months 7-12)**: [Full deployment, measurement]
+
+## Key Risks & Mitigation
+1. **[Risk]** - Mitigation: [Strategy]
+2. **[Risk]** - Mitigation: [Strategy]
+
+## Investment Required
+- Capital: $[amount]
+- People: [FTE count] over [timeframe]
+- Timeline: [Duration]
+- Expected ROI: [X]% by [timeframe]
+
+## Success Metrics
+- [KPI 1]: [Target by date]
+- [KPI 2]: [Target by date]
+- [KPI 3]: [Target by date]
+
+## Next Steps
+1. **[Action]** - Owner: [Name], Due: [Date]
+2. **[Action]** - Owner: [Name], Due: [Date]
+```
+
+## Example Usage
+
+```
+Input: Should we invest in building an AI-powered customer service platform?
+
+Workflow Execution:
+1. Situation: Current support costs $5M/year, 24-hour response time,
+   customer satisfaction 3.2/5
+
+2. Issue Tree (MECE):
+   ├─ Market Opportunity
+   │  ├─ Cost savings potential
+   │  ├─ Customer experience improvement
+   │  └─ Competitive differentiation
+   ├─ Technical Feasibility
+   │  ├─ AI/ML capabilities required
+   │  ├─ Data availability and quality
+   │  └─ Integration complexity
+   └─ Business Case
+      ├─ Development cost and timeline
+      ├─ ROI and payback period
+      └─ Risk vs reward profile
+
+3. Hypothesis: "AI platform will reduce support costs by 60% while
+   improving satisfaction to 4.5/5 within 18 months"
+
+4. Quantitative Analysis:
+   - Current cost: $5M/year
+   - Projected savings: $3M/year (60% reduction)
+   - Development cost: $2M
+   - Payback period: 8 months
+   - 5-year NPV: $12M
+
+5. ISE Framework Scoring:
+   - Customer Value: 5/5 (CxO-validated cost savings + satisfaction)
+   - Company Value: 4/5 ($3M annual recurring savings)
+   - Ecosystem Impact: 3/5 (replicable across industry)
+   - Technical Innovation: 4/5 (frontier AI/ML)
+   - Engineering Effort: 4/5 (120 dev days)
+   - Time to Production: 4/5 (3 months MVP)
+   Composite Score: 4.0/5 - STRONG STRATEGIC PRIORITY
+
+6. Framework: Porter's Five Forces shows AI as key competitive moat
+
+7. Recommendation: "Invest $2M to build AI customer service platform"
+
+8. Executive Summary: Three key messages format with roadmap
+
+Output:
+✅ RECOMMEND: Proceed with AI platform development
+Expected Impact: $3M annual savings, 4.5/5 customer satisfaction
+ROI: 150% over 5 years, 8-month payback
+Next Step: Approve $2M budget, kickoff with 6-person team by Q2
+```
+
+## Strategic Frameworks Catalog
+
+### Porter's Five Forces
+- Threat of new entrants
+- Bargaining power of suppliers
+- Bargaining power of buyers
+- Threat of substitute products
+- Competitive rivalry
+
+### 7S Framework (McKinsey)
+- Strategy, Structure, Systems
+- Shared Values, Style, Staff, Skills
+
+### Three Horizons Model
+- Horizon 1: Core business optimization
+- Horizon 2: Emerging opportunities
+- Horizon 3: Transformational bets
+
+### Value Chain Analysis
+- Primary: Inbound logistics, operations, outbound, marketing, service
+- Support: Infrastructure, HR, technology, procurement
+
+### BCG Growth-Share Matrix
+- Stars, Cash Cows, Question Marks, Dogs
+
+## Related Agents
+- **domik-mckinsey-strategic-decision-maker** - Full agent with deep analysis
+- **satya-board-of-directors** - System-thinking strategic guidance
+- **antonio-strategy-expert** - Business strategy frameworks
+- **amy-cfo** - Financial analysis and ROI modeling
+- **ali-chief-of-staff** - Strategic initiative coordination
+
+## Decision Quality Criteria
+
+### Six Tests of a Good Decision
+1. **Framing**: Right question being answered?
+2. **Alternatives**: Multiple options considered?
+3. **Information**: Reliable data gathered?
+4. **Values**: Aligned with company values/strategy?
+5. **Logic**: Sound reasoning and analysis?
+6. **Commitment**: Stakeholders aligned and committed?
+
+## ISE Engineering Fundamentals Alignment
+- Architecture Decision Records (ADRs) for strategic tech decisions
+- Trade studies before major investments
+- Technical spikes for high-risk unknowns
+- Data-driven decision making with metrics
+- Iterative approach: pilot → scale → optimize

package/LICENSE

@@ -0,0 +1,60 @@
+MyConvergio - Claude Code Subagents Suite
+Copyright (c) 2025 Convergio.io
+
+This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
+
+To view a copy of this license, visit:
+http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/
+
+---
+
+TERMS OF USE
+
+You are free to:
+- Share — copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format
+- Adapt — remix, transform, and build upon the material
+
+Under the following terms:
+- Attribution — You must give appropriate credit, provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made
+- NonCommercial — You may not use the material for commercial purposes
+- ShareAlike — If you remix, transform, or build upon the material, you must distribute your contributions under the same license
+
+NO WARRANTIES OR GUARANTEES
+
+This software is provided "AS IS" and "AS AVAILABLE" without any warranties or guarantees of any kind, express or implied. This is an experimental project provided for educational and research purposes only.
+
+The author(s) disclaim all warranties, including but not limited to:
+- Merchantability
+- Fitness for a particular purpose  
+- Non-infringement
+- Accuracy or reliability
+- Performance or availability
+
+USE AT YOUR OWN RISK
+
+You acknowledge and agree that:
+- This is experimental software that may contain bugs, errors, or unexpected behavior
+- The author(s) are not responsible for any damages, losses, or issues arising from use
+- No technical support or maintenance is provided
+- Features may change or be discontinued at any time
+
+DISCLAIMER OF AFFILIATION
+
+This project is:
+- NOT affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by Anthropic PBC
+- NOT affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by OpenAI Inc.
+- NOT an official Microsoft product or service
+- An independent experimental project by the author
+
+AUTHOR DISCLOSURE:
+Roberto D'Angelo is a Microsoft employee. This is a personal project inspired by Microsoft's exceptional culture and values, adapted for AI agent ecosystems. The values framework acknowledges Microsoft's leadership in ethical technology development while being implemented independently.
+
+Claude Code subagents are a feature of Claude by Anthropic. This project provides example implementations and is not associated with the official Claude development team.
+
+RELATED PROJECTS
+
+This work is part of the broader Convergio.io initiative. For more information, visit: https://convergio.io (coming soon)
+
+---
+
+For questions about licensing or commercial use, please contact: roberdan@fightthestroke.org