musubi-sdd 6.2.1 → 6.3.0

package/src/templates/agents/claude-code/skills/requirements-reviewer/SKILL.md

@@ -161,13 +161,13 @@ Fagan Inspection is a formal, structured review process designed to identify def
 
 #### 4.1.2 Inspection Roles
 
-| Role | Responsibility |
-|------|---------------|
+| Role          | Responsibility                                                    |
+| ------------- | ----------------------------------------------------------------- |
 | **Moderator** | Facilitates inspection, ensures process is followed, manages time |
-| **Author** | Created the document, answers questions, performs rework |
-| **Reader** | Paraphrases requirements during meeting |
-| **Recorder** | Documents all defects, issues, and decisions |
-| **Inspector** | Reviews document, identifies defects |
+| **Author**    | Created the document, answers questions, performs rework          |
+| **Reader**    | Paraphrases requirements during meeting                           |
+| **Recorder**  | Documents all defects, issues, and decisions                      |
+| **Inspector** | Reviews document, identifies defects                              |
 
 ### 4.2 Perspective-Based Reading (PBR)
 
@@ -279,14 +279,14 @@ PBR assigns specific perspectives to reviewers to ensure comprehensive coverage.
 
 ### 5.1 Defect Types
 
-| Type | Description | Example |
-|------|-------------|---------|
-| **Missing** | Required information is absent | No error handling specified |
-| **Incorrect** | Information is factually wrong | Contradicts business rules |
-| **Ambiguous** | Information can be interpreted multiple ways | "System shall respond quickly" |
-| **Conflicting** | Contradicts another requirement | REQ-001 vs REQ-023 |
-| **Redundant** | Unnecessarily duplicated | Same requirement in multiple places |
-| **Untestable** | Cannot be verified | "System shall be user-friendly" |
+| Type            | Description                                  | Example                             |
+| --------------- | -------------------------------------------- | ----------------------------------- |
+| **Missing**     | Required information is absent               | No error handling specified         |
+| **Incorrect**   | Information is factually wrong               | Contradicts business rules          |
+| **Ambiguous**   | Information can be interpreted multiple ways | "System shall respond quickly"      |
+| **Conflicting** | Contradicts another requirement              | REQ-001 vs REQ-023                  |
+| **Redundant**   | Unnecessarily duplicated                     | Same requirement in multiple places |
+| **Untestable**  | Cannot be verified                           | "System shall be user-friendly"     |
 
 ### 5.2 Severity Levels
 
@@ -335,6 +335,7 @@ PBR assigns specific perspectives to reviewers to ensure comprehensive coverage.
 When reviewing EARS-formatted requirements:
 
 ### 6.1 Ubiquitous Requirements
+
 ```
 Pattern: "The <system> shall <action>."
 Checklist:
@@ -345,6 +346,7 @@ Checklist:
 ```
 
 ### 6.2 Event-Driven Requirements
+
 ```
 Pattern: "When <trigger>, the <system> shall <action>."
 Checklist:
@@ -355,6 +357,7 @@ Checklist:
 ```
 
 ### 6.3 State-Driven Requirements
+
 ```
 Pattern: "While <state>, the <system> shall <action>."
 Checklist:
@@ -365,6 +368,7 @@ Checklist:
 ```
 
 ### 6.4 Unwanted Behavior Requirements
+
 ```
 Pattern: "If <condition>, then the <system> shall <action>."
 Checklist:
@@ -375,6 +379,7 @@ Checklist:
 ```
 
 ### 6.5 Optional Feature Requirements
+
 ```
 Pattern: "Where <feature enabled>, the <system> shall <action>."
 Checklist:
@@ -469,6 +474,7 @@ d) 修正済みドキュメント出力
 # Requirements Review - Defect Log
 
 ## Document Information
+
 - **Document**: [Document Name]
 - **Version**: [Version]
 - **Review Date**: [Date]
@@ -478,7 +484,7 @@ d) 修正済みドキュメント出力
 ## Defect Summary
 
 | Severity | Count | Resolved | Remaining |
-|----------|-------|----------|-----------|
+| -------- | ----- | -------- | --------- |
 | Critical | X     | X        | X         |
 | Major    | X     | X        | X         |
 | Minor    | X     | X        | X         |
@@ -487,6 +493,7 @@ d) 修正済みドキュメント出力
 ## Detailed Defects
 
 ### DEF-001: [Title]
+
 - **Requirement ID**: REQ-XXX
 - **Section**: X.X.X
 - **Severity**: Critical/Major/Minor
@@ -498,6 +505,7 @@ d) 修正済みドキュメント出力
 - **Status**: Open/Resolved
 
 ### DEF-002: [Title]
+
 ...
 ```
 
@@ -507,6 +515,7 @@ d) 修正済みドキュメント出力
 # Perspective-Based Requirements Review Report
 
 ## Document: [Name]
+
 ## Review Date: [Date]
 
 ---
@@ -514,11 +523,13 @@ d) 修正済みドキュメント出力
 ## 👤 User Perspective Review
 
 ### Findings
-| ID | Issue | Severity | Recommendation |
-|----|-------|----------|----------------|
-| U-1 | ... | ... | ... |
+
+| ID  | Issue | Severity | Recommendation |
+| --- | ----- | -------- | -------------- |
+| U-1 | ...   | ...      | ...            |
 
 ### Coverage Assessment
+
 - User scenarios: X% covered
 - User tasks: X% complete
 - Error handling from user view: X/X items
@@ -528,11 +539,13 @@ d) 修正済みドキュメント出力
 ## 💻 Developer Perspective Review
 
 ### Findings
-| ID | Issue | Severity | Recommendation |
-|----|-------|----------|----------------|
-| D-1 | ... | ... | ... |
+
+| ID  | Issue | Severity | Recommendation |
+| --- | ----- | -------- | -------------- |
+| D-1 | ...   | ...      | ...            |
 
 ### Technical Feasibility
+
 - Implementation clarity: X/10
 - Edge cases specified: X%
 - API specifications: Complete/Partial/Missing
@@ -542,11 +555,13 @@ d) 修正済みドキュメント出力
 ## 🧪 Tester Perspective Review
 
 ### Findings
-| ID | Issue | Severity | Recommendation |
-|----|-------|----------|----------------|
-| T-1 | ... | ... | ... |
+
+| ID  | Issue | Severity | Recommendation |
+| --- | ----- | -------- | -------------- |
+| T-1 | ...   | ...      | ...            |
 
 ### Testability Assessment
+
 - Testable requirements: X%
 - Acceptance criteria quality: X/10
 - Test derivability: High/Medium/Low
@@ -556,11 +571,13 @@ d) 修正済みドキュメント出力
 ## 🏗️ Architect Perspective Review
 
 ### Findings
-| ID | Issue | Severity | Recommendation |
-|----|-------|----------|----------------|
-| A-1 | ... | ... | ... |
+
+| ID  | Issue | Severity | Recommendation |
+| --- | ----- | -------- | -------------- |
+| A-1 | ...   | ...      | ...            |
 
 ### Architectural Alignment
+
 - System boundary clarity: X/10
 - NFR completeness: X%
 - Integration requirements: Complete/Partial/Missing
@@ -570,11 +587,13 @@ d) 修正済みドキュメント出力
 ## 🔒 Security Perspective Review
 
 ### Findings
-| ID | Issue | Severity | Recommendation |
-|----|-------|----------|----------------|
-| S-1 | ... | ... | ... |
+
+| ID  | Issue | Severity | Recommendation |
+| --- | ----- | -------- | -------------- |
+| S-1 | ...   | ...      | ...            |
 
 ### Security Assessment
+
 - Authentication requirements: Complete/Partial/Missing
 - Authorization requirements: Complete/Partial/Missing
 - Data protection: Adequate/Insufficient
@@ -587,12 +606,14 @@ d) 修正済みドキュメント出力
 # Requirements Review Metrics
 
 ## Process Metrics
+
 - **Preparation Time**: X hours
 - **Meeting Time**: X hours
 - **Documents Reviewed**: X pages/sections
 - **Review Rate**: X requirements/hour
 
 ## Defect Metrics
+
 - **Total Defects Found**: X
 - **Defect Density**: X defects/requirement
 - **Defect Distribution**:
@@ -604,6 +625,7 @@ d) 修正済みドキュメント出力
   - Untestable: X%
 
 ## Perspective Coverage
+
 - User: X%
 - Developer: X%
 - Tester: X%
@@ -611,6 +633,7 @@ d) 修正済みドキュメント出力
 - Security: X%
 
 ## Quality Gate Result
+
 - [ ] All Critical defects resolved
 - [ ] Major defects < threshold (X%)
 - [ ] Testability score ≥ X
@@ -669,7 +692,7 @@ stages:
   requirements:
     skills: [requirements-analyst]
     quality-gate: requirements-review
-  
+
   requirements-review:
     skills: [requirements-reviewer]
     criteria:
@@ -830,14 +853,16 @@ Requirements Reviewer AIはレビュー結果をユーザーに提示し、ユ
 ## 📋 Requirements Review Results
 
 ### Summary
-| Severity | Count | Status |
-|----------|-------|--------|
-| 🔴 Critical | 2 | Must fix before design |
-| 🟠 Major | 5 | Should fix before design |
-| 🟡 Minor | 3 | Should fix, can proceed |
-| 🟢 Suggestion | 4 | Consider for improvement |
+
+| Severity      | Count | Status                   |
+| ------------- | ----- | ------------------------ |
+| 🔴 Critical   | 2     | Must fix before design   |
+| 🟠 Major      | 5     | Should fix before design |
+| 🟡 Minor      | 3     | Should fix, can proceed  |
+| 🟢 Suggestion | 4     | Consider for improvement |
 
 ### Quality Gate: ❌ FAILED
+
 - Critical issues must be resolved before proceeding
 
 ---
@@ -845,20 +870,24 @@ Requirements Reviewer AIはレビュー結果をユーザーに提示し、ユ
 ### 🔴 Critical Issues
 
 #### DEF-001: Missing Performance Requirement
+
 **Location**: Section 3.2, Line 45
 **Type**: Missing
 **Requirement**: REQ-FUNC-012
 
 **Current Text:**
+
 > "The system shall process user requests."
 
 **Issue:**
 Performance criteria not specified. Cannot verify implementation meets expectations.
 
 **Recommendation:**
+
 > "The system shall process user requests within 500ms for 95th percentile under normal load (up to 500 concurrent users)."
 
 **Your Decision:**
+
 - [ ] Accept recommendation
 - [ ] Modify (specify your changes)
 - [ ] Reject (provide reason)
@@ -943,27 +972,27 @@ console.log(correctionResult.updatedQualityGate);
 
 ### Changes Applied
 
-| Defect ID | Action | Original | Corrected |
-|-----------|--------|----------|-----------|
-| DEF-001 | Accepted | "process user requests" | "process within 500ms..." |
-| DEF-002 | Modified | "shall be fast" | "Custom: within 200ms..." |
-| DEF-004 | Accepted | (missing) | Added REQ-SEC-015 |
+| Defect ID | Action   | Original                | Corrected                 |
+| --------- | -------- | ----------------------- | ------------------------- |
+| DEF-001   | Accepted | "process user requests" | "process within 500ms..." |
+| DEF-002   | Modified | "shall be fast"         | "Custom: within 200ms..." |
+| DEF-004   | Accepted | (missing)               | Added REQ-SEC-015         |
 
 ### Rejected Findings
 
-| Defect ID | Reason |
-|-----------|--------|
-| DEF-003 | Intentionally vague for flexibility |
-| DEF-005 | Will be addressed in Phase 2 |
+| Defect ID | Reason                              |
+| --------- | ----------------------------------- |
+| DEF-003   | Intentionally vague for flexibility |
+| DEF-005   | Will be addressed in Phase 2        |
 
 ### Updated Quality Gate
 
-| Criterion | Before | After |
-|-----------|--------|-------|
-| Critical Issues | 2 | 0 ✅ |
-| Major Issues | 5 | 1 |
-| EARS Compliance | 45% | 85% |
-| Testability Score | 60% | 90% |
+| Criterion         | Before | After |
+| ----------------- | ------ | ----- |
+| Critical Issues   | 2      | 0 ✅  |
+| Major Issues      | 5      | 1     |
+| EARS Compliance   | 45%    | 85%   |
+| Testability Score | 60%    | 90%   |
 
 **Status**: ✅ PASSED (Ready for Design Phase)
 
@@ -991,7 +1020,7 @@ This skill ensures compliance with Article 3 (Quality Assurance) of the MUSUBI C
 
 ## Version History
 
-| Version | Date | Changes |
-|---------|------|---------|
-| 1.0.0 | 2025-12-27 | Initial release with Fagan Inspection and PBR support |
-| 1.1.0 | 2025-12-27 | Added interactive review and correction workflow |
+| Version | Date       | Changes                                               |
+| ------- | ---------- | ----------------------------------------------------- |
+| 1.0.0   | 2025-12-27 | Initial release with Fagan Inspection and PBR support |
+| 1.1.0   | 2025-12-27 | Added interactive review and correction workflow      |

package/src/templates/agents/codex/AGENTS.md

@@ -233,8 +233,8 @@ const analysis = await generator.analyze();
 
 ## Learn More
 
-- [MUSUBI Documentation](https://github.com/nahisaho/musubi)
-- [CLI Reference](https://github.com/nahisaho/musubi#cli-commands) - Detailed CLI options
+- [MUSUBI Documentation](https://github.com/nahisaho/MUSUBI)
+- [CLI Reference](https://github.com/nahisaho/MUSUBI#cli-commands) - Detailed CLI options
 - [Constitutional Governance](steering/rules/constitution.md)
 - [8-Stage SDD Workflow](steering/rules/workflow.md)
 

package/src/templates/agents/cursor/AGENTS.md

@@ -233,8 +233,8 @@ const analysis = await generator.analyze();
 
 ## Learn More
 
-- [MUSUBI Documentation](https://github.com/nahisaho/musubi)
-- [CLI Reference](https://github.com/nahisaho/musubi#cli-commands) - Detailed CLI options
+- [MUSUBI Documentation](https://github.com/nahisaho/MUSUBI)
+- [CLI Reference](https://github.com/nahisaho/MUSUBI#cli-commands) - Detailed CLI options
 - [Constitutional Governance](steering/rules/constitution.md)
 - [8-Stage SDD Workflow](steering/rules/workflow.md)
 

package/src/templates/agents/gemini-cli/GEMINI.md

@@ -222,8 +222,8 @@ const analysis = await generator.analyze();
 
 ## Learn More
 
-- [MUSUBI Documentation](https://github.com/nahisaho/musubi)
-- [CLI Reference](https://github.com/nahisaho/musubi#cli-commands) - Detailed CLI options
+- [MUSUBI Documentation](https://github.com/nahisaho/MUSUBI)
+- [CLI Reference](https://github.com/nahisaho/MUSUBI#cli-commands) - Detailed CLI options
 - [Constitutional Governance](steering/rules/constitution.md)
 - [8-Stage SDD Workflow](steering/rules/workflow.md)
 

package/src/templates/agents/github-copilot/AGENTS.md

@@ -277,8 +277,8 @@ npx musubi-gui start
 
 ## Learn More
 
-- [MUSUBI Documentation](https://github.com/nahisaho/musubi)
-- [CLI Reference](https://github.com/nahisaho/musubi#cli-commands) - Detailed CLI options
+- [MUSUBI Documentation](https://github.com/nahisaho/MUSUBI)
+- [CLI Reference](https://github.com/nahisaho/MUSUBI#cli-commands) - Detailed CLI options
 - [Constitutional Governance](steering/rules/constitution.md)
 - [8-Stage SDD Workflow](steering/rules/workflow.md)
 

package/src/templates/agents/github-copilot/commands/sdd-requirements.prompt.md

@@ -67,36 +67,47 @@ steering/tech.md         # Technology stack
 **Question Sequence** (Ask ONE at a time, wait for answer before next):
 
 **Turn 1**: Start with the WHY question
+
 ```
 この機能で解決したい『本当の課題』は何ですか？
 ```
+
 → STOP HERE. Wait for user response.
 
 **Turn 2**: Based on answer, ask WHO question
+
 ```
 この機能を最も必要としているのは誰ですか？
 ```
+
 → STOP HERE. Wait for user response.
 
 **Turn 3**: Ask WHAT-IF question
+
 ```
 もしこの機能が完璧に動作したら、何が変わりますか？
 ```
+
 → STOP HERE. Wait for user response.
 
 **Turn 4**: Ask CONSTRAINT question
+
 ```
 この機能で『絶対にやってはいけないこと』はありますか？
 ```
+
 → STOP HERE. Wait for user response.
 
 **Turn 5**: Ask SUCCESS CRITERIA question
+
 ```
 この機能が『成功した』と言えるのはどんな状態ですか？
 ```
+
 → STOP HERE. Wait for user response.
 
 **After 5+ turns**: Summarize and confirm
+
 ```
 ここまでの理解を確認させてください：
 [Summary]
@@ -106,22 +117,25 @@ steering/tech.md         # Technology stack
 #### Example Dialogue Flow
 
 **AI Turn 1**:
+
 > まず、この機能について教えてください。
-> 
+>
 > **この機能で解決したい『本当の課題』は何ですか？**
 
 **User**: "CSVから社員データをインポートしたい"
 
 **AI Turn 2**:
+
 > なるほど、社員データのCSVインポートですね。
-> 
+>
 > **このインポート機能を最も必要としているのは誰ですか？**（人事部？IT管理者？）
 
 **User**: "人事部です"
 
 **AI Turn 3**:
+
 > 人事部の方が使うのですね。
-> 
+>
 > **もしこの機能が完璧に動作したら、人事部の業務はどう変わりますか？**
 
 ...(continues one question at a time)
@@ -167,6 +181,7 @@ steering/tech.md         # Technology stack
 | External | Any third-party APIs or services? |
 
 **MECE Completeness Check**:
+
 - [ ] All user types covered?
 - [ ] All states (normal, edge, error) covered?
 - [ ] All data flows covered?
@@ -226,18 +241,21 @@ Use template from `templates/requirements.md`:
 ## MECE Coverage Summary
 
 ### User Journey Coverage
+
 - [ ] Before: Entry/Discovery
 - [ ] During: Core Flow
 - [ ] After: Completion
 - [ ] Error: Exception Handling
 
 ### Data Lifecycle Coverage
+
 - [ ] Create
 - [ ] Read
 - [ ] Update
 - [ ] Delete
 
 ### Cross-Cutting Concerns
+
 - [ ] Security
 - [ ] Performance
 - [ ] Reliability
@@ -587,7 +605,7 @@ Present summary to user:
    - **表面的要求**: ユーザーがログインできること
    - **真の目的**: SOC2準拠でセキュアな顧客データ保護
    - **成功基準**: ログイン成功率99%以上、不正アクセスゼロ
-   この理解で正しいですか？」
+     この理解で正しいですか？」
 
 3. **MECE Analysis**:
    - User Journey: Login → Session → Logout → Error handling
@@ -690,6 +708,7 @@ If `storage/specs/{{feature-name}}-requirements.md` exists:
 ---
 
 **Output Directory Summary**:
+
 - Requirements documents: `storage/specs/{{feature-name}}-requirements.md`
 - Japanese version: `storage/specs/{{feature-name}}-requirements.ja.md`
 

package/src/templates/agents/qwen-code/QWEN.md

@@ -222,8 +222,8 @@ const analysis = await generator.analyze();
 
 ## Learn More
 
-- [MUSUBI Documentation](https://github.com/nahisaho/musubi)
-- [CLI Reference](https://github.com/nahisaho/musubi#cli-commands) - Detailed CLI options
+- [MUSUBI Documentation](https://github.com/nahisaho/MUSUBI)
+- [CLI Reference](https://github.com/nahisaho/MUSUBI#cli-commands) - Detailed CLI options
 - [Constitutional Governance](steering/rules/constitution.md)
 - [8-Stage SDD Workflow](steering/rules/workflow.md)
 

package/src/templates/agents/shared/AGENTS.md

@@ -719,4 +719,4 @@ The orchestrator will:
 
 ---
 
-**Generated by MUSUBI v0.1.3** | [Documentation](https://github.com/nahisaho/musubi)
+**Generated by MUSUBI v0.1.3** | [Documentation](https://github.com/nahisaho/MUSUBI)

package/src/templates/agents/windsurf/AGENTS.md

@@ -233,8 +233,8 @@ const analysis = await generator.analyze();
 
 ## Learn More
 
-- [MUSUBI Documentation](https://github.com/nahisaho/musubi)
-- [CLI Reference](https://github.com/nahisaho/musubi#cli-commands) - Detailed CLI options
+- [MUSUBI Documentation](https://github.com/nahisaho/MUSUBI)
+- [CLI Reference](https://github.com/nahisaho/MUSUBI#cli-commands) - Detailed CLI options
 - [Constitutional Governance](steering/rules/constitution.md)
 - [8-Stage SDD Workflow](steering/rules/workflow.md)
 

package/src/templates/skills/browser-agent.md

@@ -166,4 +166,4 @@ await agent.close();
 ## 関連
 
 - [Playwright Documentation](https://playwright.dev/)
-- [MUSUBI SDD](https://github.com/nahisaho/musubi)
+- [MUSUBI SDD](https://github.com/nahisaho/MUSUBI)

package/src/traceability/extractor.js

@@ -1,8 +1,8 @@
 /**
  * TraceabilityExtractor Implementation
- * 
+ *
  * Extracts requirement ID patterns from code, tests, commits, and documents.
- * 
+ *
  * Requirement: IMP-6.2-004-01
  * Design: Section 5.1
  */
@@ -18,10 +18,10 @@ const execAsync = promisify(exec);
  * Requirement ID patterns
  */
 const REQ_PATTERNS = [
-  /REQ-[A-Z0-9]+-\d{3}/g,              // REQ-XXX-NNN
-  /IMP-\d+\.\d+-\d{3}(?:-\d{2})?/g,    // IMP-6.2-001 or IMP-6.2-001-01
-  /FEAT-\d{3}/g,                        // FEAT-001
-  /TASK-\d{3}/g,                        // TASK-001
+  /REQ-[A-Z0-9]+-\d{3}/g, // REQ-XXX-NNN
+  /IMP-\d+\.\d+-\d{3}(?:-\d{2})?/g, // IMP-6.2-001 or IMP-6.2-001-01
+  /FEAT-\d{3}/g, // FEAT-001
+  /TASK-\d{3}/g, // TASK-001
 ];
 
 /**
@@ -34,12 +34,12 @@ const DEFAULT_CONFIG = {
   includePatterns: ['*.js', '*.ts', '*.tsx', '*.jsx', '*.md'],
   excludePatterns: ['node_modules/**', '*.test.js', '*.spec.js'],
   scanCommits: false,
-  maxCommits: 100
+  maxCommits: 100,
 };
 
 /**
  * TraceabilityExtractor
- * 
+ *
  * Extracts requirement references from various sources.
  */
 class TraceabilityExtractor {
@@ -60,7 +60,7 @@ class TraceabilityExtractor {
     try {
       await fs.access(filePath);
       const content = await fs.readFile(filePath, 'utf-8');
-      
+
       return this.extractFromContent(content, filePath, sourceType);
     } catch {
       return [];
@@ -85,7 +85,7 @@ class TraceabilityExtractor {
       for (const pattern of REQ_PATTERNS) {
         // Reset regex state
         pattern.lastIndex = 0;
-        
+
         let match;
         while ((match = pattern.exec(line)) !== null) {
           refs.push({
@@ -94,7 +94,7 @@ class TraceabilityExtractor {
             filePath,
             lineNumber: lineNum + 1,
             context: line.trim().substring(0, 100),
-            foundAt: now
+            foundAt: now,
           });
         }
       }
@@ -117,14 +117,17 @@ class TraceabilityExtractor {
         `git log -${maxCommits} --format="%H|%s|%ad|%ae" --date=short`
       );
 
-      const lines = stdout.trim().split('\n').filter(l => l.length > 0);
+      const lines = stdout
+        .trim()
+        .split('\n')
+        .filter(l => l.length > 0);
 
       for (const line of lines) {
-        const [hash, message, date, author] = line.split('|');
+        const [hash, message] = line.split('|');
 
         for (const pattern of REQ_PATTERNS) {
           pattern.lastIndex = 0;
-          
+
           let match;
           while ((match = pattern.exec(message)) !== null) {
             refs.push({
@@ -133,7 +136,7 @@ class TraceabilityExtractor {
               commitHash: hash,
               commitMessage: message,
               context: message,
-              foundAt: now
+              foundAt: now,
             });
           }
         }
@@ -164,7 +167,7 @@ class TraceabilityExtractor {
         if (stat.isDirectory()) {
           // Skip excluded directories
           if (this.isExcluded(entry)) continue;
-          
+
           const subRefs = await this.scanDirectory(fullPath, sourceType);
           refs.push(...subRefs);
         } else if (stat.isFile() && this.shouldInclude(entry)) {
@@ -263,7 +266,7 @@ class TraceabilityExtractor {
    */
   isExcluded(name) {
     const excludePatterns = this.config.excludePatterns || [];
-    
+
     for (const pattern of excludePatterns) {
       if (pattern.includes('**')) {
         // Glob pattern with directory
@@ -283,10 +286,8 @@ class TraceabilityExtractor {
    */
   matchPattern(filename, pattern) {
     // Convert glob pattern to regex
-    const regexPattern = pattern
-      .replace(/\./g, '\\.')
-      .replace(/\*/g, '.*');
-    
+    const regexPattern = pattern.replace(/\./g, '\\.').replace(/\*/g, '.*');
+
     return new RegExp(`^${regexPattern}$`).test(filename);
   }
 }