muigui 0.0.16 → 0.0.17

package/README.md

@@ -179,9 +179,9 @@ into using tweakpane and it doesn't meet my needs as of v4.0.0. Examples below
   ```js
   const uniforms = {
     color1: [1, 0.5, 0.25],                   // orange
-    color2: new Float32Array([0, 1, 1]);      // cyan
-    color3: new Uint8Array([0, 128, 0, 128]); // transparent green
-  }
+    color2: new Float32Array([0, 1, 1]),      // cyan
+    color3: new Uint8Array([0, 128, 0, 128]), // transparent green
+  };
   ```
 
   Neither dat.gui, lil.gui, nor tweakpane can edit these AFAICT. (2023)
@@ -311,11 +311,11 @@ have not made it into muigui yet.
   But that's not really what you get from a typed system.
   In a typed system, the fact that `someOption` is an enum
   is known from its type. Similar that `someColor` is a
-  a color is known from it's type. `someNumber` is still
+  a color is known from its type. `someNumber` is still
   problematic because it needs a range which is probably
   not part of its type.
 
-  In any case, I'd be nice to find a way to get an
+  In any case, It'd be nice to find a way to get an
   instant UI like C#/Unity does.  
 
 * ## Modularity
@@ -325,7 +325,10 @@ have not made it into muigui yet.
   editor that is the combination of 3 number editors.
 
   I'm still experimenting. While muigui has components that
-  do this I'm not happy with the API ergonomics yet.
+  do this I'm not happy with the API ergonomics yet and is
+  why I haven't documented them. In fact I'd pretty much like
+  to re-write all of the code for like the 4th time 😅 but
+  I hope to keep the normal usage API the same.
 
   Similarly I'd like to more easily split layout so it's trivial
   to layout sub components. Again, still experimenting.
@@ -380,6 +383,36 @@ have not made it into muigui yet.
   just returned a canvas and left the rest outside
   the library made it way more flexible.
 
+  Another example might be monitoring. Some libraries
+  provide a way to make a GUI part poll its value for
+  the purpose of displaying values but does that really
+  need to be part of the library?
+
+  Compare
+
+  ```js
+  pane.addBinding(PARAMS, 'data', {
+    readonly: true,
+    interval: 200,
+  });
+  ```
+
+  vs
+
+  ```js
+  const label = gui.addLabel();
+  setInterval(() => {
+    label.text(JSON.stringify(PARAMS.data, null, 2));
+  }, 200);
+  ```
+
+  They're about the same amount of code but in the first version
+  you can only make that area show the data at `PARAMS.data` where
+  as in the 2nd version you can show whatever you want. Data
+  for the currently select item, player stats, a text based graph.
+  You're not limited to only properties of `PARAMS` nor are you
+  limited to how it chooses to format those.
+
   This problem of providing too specialized a solution
   is endemic throughout the library ecosystem of pretty much
   every language.
@@ -389,6 +422,8 @@ have not made it into muigui yet.
   wrong solution. It's better to provide the
   building blocks.
 
+  `</rant>` 😅
+
 ## No Save/Restore
 
 The problem with save/restore in lil.gui etc is it assumes the data

package/dist/0.x/muigui.js

@@ -1,4 +1,4 @@
-/* muigui@0.0.16, license MIT */
+/* muigui@0.0.17, license MIT */
 (function (global, factory) {
   typeof exports === 'object' && typeof module !== 'undefined' ? module.exports = factory() :
   typeof define === 'function' && define.amd ? define(factory) :

package/dist/0.x/muigui.module.js

@@ -1,4 +1,4 @@
-/* muigui@0.0.16, license MIT */
+/* muigui@0.0.17, license MIT */
 var css = {
   default: `
 .muigui {

package/package.json

@@ -1,9 +1,9 @@
 {
   "name": "muigui",
-  "version": "0.0.16",
+  "version": "0.0.17",
   "description": "A Simple GUI",
   "main": "dist/0.x/muigui.js",
-  "module": "dist/0.x/muigui-module.js",
+  "module": "dist/0.x/muigui.module.js",
   "type": "module",
   "scripts": {
     "build": "npm run build-normal",