monomind 1.19.0 → 2.0.1

package/.claude/skills/github-issue-triage/SKILL.md

@@ -1,354 +0,0 @@
----
-name: github-issue-triage
-description: >
-  Three-phase GitHub issue triage: automatic audit with 6-dimension analysis (categorization,
-  PR cross-ref, Jaccard duplicate detection, risk classification, staleness, action recommendations),
-  opt-in parallel deep analysis via AI agents, and draft-then-validate action execution.
-  Args: "all" for deep analysis of all issues, issue numbers to focus (e.g. "42 57"), no arg = audit only.
-allowed-tools:
-  - Bash
-  - Read
-  - Grep
-effort: medium
-tags: [triage, issues, github, categorize, duplicates, risk, cross-ref]
----
-
-# GitHub Issue Triage
-
-// Pattern adapted from RTK (Rust Token Killer) issue-triage skill — rebranded for monomind
-
-Three-phase workflow: automatic audit → opt-in deep analysis → draft-then-validate actions.
-
-| Skill | Use case | Output |
-|-------|----------|--------|
-| `/github-issue-triage` | Audit issues, categorize, detect duplicates, post comments | Action tables + deep analysis reports + validated comments |
-| `/github-repo-recap` | Full repo snapshot for team sharing | Markdown recap (PRs + issues + releases) |
-
-**Triggers:**
-- Manual: `/github-issue-triage`, `/github-issue-triage all`, `/github-issue-triage 42 57`
-- Proactive: when >10 open issues without triage, or a stale issue (>30 days) is detected
-
-## Preconditions
-
-```bash
-git rev-parse --is-inside-work-tree
-gh auth status
-```
-
-If either fails, stop and explain what's missing.
-
----
-
-## Phase 1 — Audit (always runs)
-
-### Data Gathering (run in parallel)
-
-```bash
-# Repo identity
-gh repo view --json nameWithOwner -q .nameWithOwner
-
-# Open issues with full metadata
-gh issue list --state open --limit 100 \
-  --json number,title,author,createdAt,updatedAt,labels,assignees,body,comments
-
-# Open PRs (for cross-referencing)
-gh pr list --state open --limit 50 --json number,title,body
-
-# Recently closed issues (for duplicate detection)
-gh issue list --state closed --limit 20 \
-  --json number,title,labels,closedAt
-
-# Collaborators (never auto-close their issues)
-gh api "repos/{owner}/{repo}/collaborators" --jq '.[].login'
-```
-
-**Collaborator fallback**: if `gh api .../collaborators` fails (403/404):
-```bash
-gh pr list --state merged --limit 10 --json author --jq '.[].author.login' | sort -u
-```
-If still ambiguous, use `AskUserQuestion` to clarify with the user.
-
-**Note**: `author` is an object `{login: "..."}` — always extract `.author.login`.
-
-### Analysis — 6 Dimensions
-
-**1. Categorization** (existing labels take precedence; infer from title/body if unlabeled):
-- **Bug**: keywords `crash`, `error`, `fail`, `broken`, `regression`, `wrong`, `unexpected`
-- **Feature**: `add`, `implement`, `support`, `new`, `feat:`
-- **Enhancement**: `improve`, `optimize`, `better`, `enhance`, `refactor`
-- **Question/Support**: `how`, `why`, `help`, `unclear`, `docs`, `documentation`
-- **Duplicate Candidate**: see dimension 3 below
-
-**2. PR Cross-Reference**:
-- Scan the `body` of every open PR for `fixes #N`, `closes #N`, `resolves #N` (case-insensitive, regex)
-- Build a map: `issue_number → [PR numbers]`
-- If the linked PR is already merged and the issue is still open → recommend closing
-
-**3. Duplicate Detection**:
-- Normalize titles: lowercase, strip common prefixes (`bug:`, `feat:`, `[bug]`, `[feature]`, etc.)
-- **Jaccard similarity on title words**: if score > 60% between two issues → duplicate candidate
-  - Jaccard = |intersection| / |union| — exclude stop words: a, the, is, in, of, for, to, with, on, at, by
-- **Body keyword overlap** > 50% → reinforces the signal
-- Compare against recently closed issues (last 20) too
-- False positives are confirmed/rejected in Phase 2 — do not act on suspicion alone
-
-**4. Risk Classification**:
-- **Red (critical)**: keywords `CVE`, `vulnerability`, `injection`, `auth bypass`, `security`, `exploit`, `unsafe`, `credentials`, `leak`, `RCE`, `XSS`
-- **Yellow (high)**: `breaking change`, `migration`, `deprecation`, `remove API`, `breaking`, `incompatible`
-- **Green**: everything else
-
-**5. Staleness**:
-- > 30 days since `updatedAt` → **Stale**
-- > 90 days since `updatedAt` → **Very Stale**
-- Calculate from today's date; `updatedAt` null → fall back to `createdAt`
-
-**6. Action Recommendations** (one per issue):
-- `Accept & Prioritize` — issue is clear, reproducible, in scope
-- `Label needed` — issue has no labels
-- `Comment needed` — missing reproduction steps, version, environment, etc.
-- `Linked to PR` — an open PR references this issue
-- `Duplicate candidate` — suspected duplicate of `#N` (specify)
-- `Close candidate` — very stale, no recent activity, or clearly out of scope (never for collaborator issues)
-- `PR merged → close` — linked PR has been merged; issue is still open
-
-### Output — 5 Tables
-
-```
-## Open Issues ({count})
-
-### Critical (red risk)
-| # | Title | Author | Age | Labels | Action |
-| - | ----- | ------ | --- | ------ | ------ |
-
-### Linked to a PR
-| # | Title | Author | Linked PR(s) | PR Status | Action |
-| - | ----- | ------ | ------------ | --------- | ------ |
-
-### Active
-| # | Title | Author | Category | Age | Labels | Action |
-| - | ----- | ------ | -------- | --- | ------ | ------ |
-
-### Duplicate Candidates
-| # | Title | Duplicate of | Similarity | Action |
-| - | ----- | ------------ | ---------- | ------ |
-
-### Stale
-| # | Title | Author | Last Activity | Action |
-| - | ----- | ------ | ------------- | ------ |
-
-### Summary
-- Total: {N} open issues
-- Critical: {N} (security or breaking-change risk)
-- Linked to PR: {N}
-- Duplicate candidates: {N}
-- Stale (>30d): {N} | Very Stale (>90d): {N}
-- No labels: {N}
-- Quick wins (label or close quickly): {list}
-```
-
-Age = days since `createdAt`, format `{N}d`. Bold if > 30 days.
-
-0 issues → print `No open issues.` and exit.
-
-### Auto-Copy
-
-After displaying the triage table, copy it to clipboard:
-```bash
-clip() {
-  if command -v pbcopy &>/dev/null; then pbcopy
-  elif command -v xclip &>/dev/null; then xclip -selection clipboard
-  elif command -v wl-copy &>/dev/null; then wl-copy
-  else cat
-  fi
-}
-clip <<'EOF'
-{full triage table}
-EOF
-```
-Confirm: `Triage table copied to clipboard.`
-
----
-
-## Phase 2 — Deep Analysis (opt-in)
-
-### Issue Selection
-
-**If an argument was passed:**
-- `"all"` → analyze all open issues
-- Numbers (e.g. `"42 57"`) → only those issues
-
-**If no argument**, ask via `AskUserQuestion`:
-
-```
-question: "Which issues would you like to analyze in depth?"
-header: "Deep Analysis"
-multiSelect: true
-options:
-  - label: "All ({N} issues)"
-    description: "Parallel deep analysis of every open issue"
-  - label: "Critical only"
-    description: "Focus on the {M} red/yellow-risk issues"
-  - label: "Duplicate candidates"
-    description: "Confirm or reject the {K} suspected duplicates"
-  - label: "Stale only"
-    description: "Close/keep decision on the {J} stale issues"
-  - label: "Skip"
-    description: "Finish here — audit only"
-```
-
-"Skip" → end workflow.
-
-### Execution
-
-For each selected issue, spawn an agent via **Task tool in parallel**:
-
-```
-subagent_type: general-purpose
-model: sonnet
-prompt: |
-  Analyze GitHub issue #{num}: "{title}" by @{author}
-
-  **Metadata**: Created {createdAt}, last updated {updatedAt}, labels: {labels}
-
-  **Body**:
-  {body}
-
-  **Existing comments** ({comments_count} total, showing last 5):
-  {last_5_comments}
-
-  **Context**:
-  - Linked PRs: {linked_prs or "none"}
-  - Duplicate candidate of: {duplicate_of or "none"}
-  - Risk classification: {risk_color}
-
-  Analyze this issue and return a structured report:
-
-  ### Scope Assessment
-  What is this issue actually asking for? Is it clearly defined?
-
-  ### Missing Information
-  What's needed to act on this? (reproduction steps, version, environment, etc.)
-
-  ### Risk & Impact
-  Security risk? Breaking change? Who is affected?
-
-  ### Effort Estimate
-  XS (<1h) / S (1–4h) / M (1–2d) / L (3–5d) / XL (>1 week)
-
-  ### Priority
-  P0 (critical, act now) / P1 (high, this sprint) / P2 (medium, backlog) / P3 (low, someday)
-
-  ### Recommended Action
-  One of: Accept & Prioritize, Request More Info, Mark Duplicate (#N),
-  Close (Stale), Close (Out of Scope), Link to Existing PR
-
-  ### Draft Comment
-  Draft a GitHub comment in English. Be specific, helpful, and constructive.
-  Include: what was found, what action is being taken, and (if closing) why.
-```
-
-If an issue has > 50 comments, summarize the last 5 only.
-
-Aggregate all agent reports. Display a summary after all analyses complete.
-
----
-
-## Phase 3 — Actions (explicit validation required)
-
-### Available Action Types
-
-- **Comment**: `gh issue comment {num} --body-file -`
-- **Label**: `gh issue edit {num} --add-label "{label}"` (skip if label already present)
-- **Close**: `gh issue close {num} --reason "not planned"` (never without explicit user approval)
-
-### Draft Generation
-
-For each analyzed issue, generate the complete action set (comment + labels + close if applicable).
-
-**Rules:**
-- GitHub comment language: **English** (international audience)
-- Tone: professional, constructive, factual
-- Never re-label an issue that already has the label
-- Never propose `close` for a collaborator's issue
-- Always show the full draft before any `gh issue comment` is executed
-
-### Display and Validation
-
-Show **all drafts** in this format:
-
-```
----
-### Draft — Issue #{num}: {title}
-
-**Proposed actions**: {Comment | Label: "bug" | Close}
-
-**Comment**:
-{full comment text}
-
----
-```
-
-Then ask for explicit approval via `AskUserQuestion`:
-
-```
-question: "These actions are ready. Which ones would you like to execute?"
-header: "Execute"
-multiSelect: true
-options:
-  - label: "All ({N} actions)"
-    description: "Comment + label + close per the drafts above"
-  - label: "Issue #{x} — {title_truncated}"
-    description: "Execute only the actions for this issue"
-  - label: "None"
-    description: "Cancel — do nothing"
-```
-
-(Generate one option per issue, plus "All" and "None".)
-
-### Execution
-
-For each validated action, execute in order: comment → label → close.
-
-```bash
-# Comment
-gh issue comment {num} --body-file - <<'COMMENT_EOF'
-{comment}
-COMMENT_EOF
-
-# Label (if applicable)
-gh issue edit {num} --add-label "{label}"
-
-# Close (if applicable)
-gh issue close {num} --reason "not planned"
-```
-
-Confirm each action: `Comment posted on issue #{num}: {title}`
-
-"None" → `No actions executed. Workflow complete.`
-
----
-
-## Edge Cases
-
-| Situation | Behavior |
-|-----------|----------|
-| 0 open issues | Print `No open issues.` and exit |
-| Issue without body | Categorize by title; recommend `Comment needed` |
-| > 50 comments | Summarize last 5 only |
-| False positive duplicate | Phase 2 confirms/rejects — never act on suspicion alone |
-| Label already present | Skip, note "label already applied" |
-| Collaborator issue | Never `close candidate` automatically |
-| GitHub API rate limit | Reduce `--limit`, notify user |
-| Merged PR linked to open issue | Recommend closing the issue |
-| Issue inactive > 90d | Very Stale — propose close with a considerate message |
-| Duplicate confirmed in Phase 2 | Post comment + close in favor of the original issue |
-
----
-
-## Notes
-
-- Always derive owner/repo via `gh repo view` — never hardcode
-- Use `gh` CLI (not direct `curl` GitHub API calls, except the collaborators endpoint)
-- `updatedAt` may be null on some issues → fall back to `createdAt`
-- Never post or close without explicit user approval in this chat session
-- Drafted comments must be shown in full BEFORE any `gh issue comment` is executed

package/.claude/skills/github-repo-recap/SKILL.md

@@ -1,207 +0,0 @@
----
-name: github-repo-recap
-description: Generate a comprehensive repository recap (open PRs by category, issues, recent releases, executive summary) formatted as Markdown ready to share with the team. Detects overlapping PRs, author clusters, and issue-PR cross-references. Copies result to clipboard.
-allowed-tools: Bash Read Grep
----
-
-# GitHub Repo Recap
-
-// Pattern adapted from RTK (Rust Token Killer) repo-recap skill — rebranded for monomind
-
-Generate a structured snapshot of the repository state: open PRs (categorized by contributor type and health), open issues, recent releases, and an executive summary. Output is Markdown with clickable GitHub links, ready to paste into Slack or a team meeting.
-
-## Preconditions
-
-Before gathering data, verify:
-
-```bash
-# Must be inside a git repo
-git rev-parse --is-inside-work-tree
-
-# Must have gh CLI authenticated
-gh auth status
-```
-
-If either check fails, stop and tell the user what's missing before proceeding.
-
-## Steps
-
-### 1. Gather Data (run in parallel)
-
-```bash
-# Repo identity (for constructing links)
-gh repo view --json nameWithOwner -q .nameWithOwner
-
-# Open PRs with full metadata
-gh pr list --state open --limit 50 \
-  --json number,title,author,createdAt,changedFiles,additions,deletions,reviewDecision,isDraft
-
-# Open issues with metadata
-gh issue list --state open --limit 50 \
-  --json number,title,author,createdAt,labels,assignees
-
-# Recent releases
-gh release list --limit 5
-
-# Recently merged PRs (contributor activity signal)
-gh pr list --state merged --limit 10 --json number,title,author,mergedAt
-```
-
-Note: `author` in JSON results is an object `{login: "..."}` — always extract `.author.login` when processing.
-
-### 2. Determine Maintainers
-
-To distinguish internal PRs from external contributions:
-
-```bash
-gh api repos/{owner}/{repo}/collaborators --jq '.[].login'
-```
-
-If this fails (403/404 permissions), fall back to: authors who have merged PRs recently are likely maintainers. When genuinely ambiguous, ask the user.
-
-### 3. Analyze and Categorize
-
-#### PRs — Three groups:
-
-**Our PRs** (author is a repo collaborator):
-- List with PR number (linked), title, size (+additions, file count), review status
-
-**External — Reviewable** (manageable size, no major blockers):
-- Additions ≤ 1000 AND files ≤ 10
-- No merge conflicts, CI not failing
-- Include: PR link, author, title, size, review status, recommended action
-
-**External — Problematic** (any of: too large, CI failing, overlapping, merge conflict):
-- Additions > 1000 OR files > 10
-- OR `reviewDecision == "CHANGES_REQUESTED"` or checks failing
-- OR touches same files as another open PR
-- Include: PR link, author, title, size, specific problem, required action
-
-**Size labels** (use in the "Size" column for fast visual triage):
-
-| Label | Additions |
-| ----- | --------- |
-| XS    | < 50      |
-| S     | 50–200    |
-| M     | 200–500   |
-| L     | 500–1000  |
-| XL    | > 1000    |
-
-Format: `+{additions}, {files} files ({label})` — e.g., `+245, 2 files (S)`
-
-#### Detect overlaps:
-
-Two PRs overlap if they modify the same files. Use `changedFiles` from the JSON. If > 50% file overlap between two PRs, flag both as overlapping and cross-reference them in the table.
-
-#### Flag clusters:
-
-If one author has 3+ open PRs, note it as a "cluster" with a suggested review order (smallest first, or by dependency chain if apparent).
-
-#### Issues — Categories:
-
-- **In progress**: has an associated open PR (match by PR body containing `fixes #N`, `closes #N`, or `resolves #N`)
-- **Quick fix**: small scope, actionable (bug reports, small enhancements)
-- **Feature request**: larger scope, needs design discussion
-- **Covered by PR**: an existing PR addresses this issue (link it)
-
-### 4. Derive Recent Releases
-
-From `gh release list` output, extract version, date, and name — list the 5 most recent.
-
-If no releases found, check merged PRs for release-please pattern (titles matching `chore(*): release *`) as fallback.
-
-### 5. Executive Summary
-
-Produce 5–6 bullet points covering:
-- Total open PRs and issues count
-- Active contributors (who has the most open PRs/issues)
-- Main risks (oversized PRs, CI failures, merge conflicts)
-- Quick wins (XS/S PRs ready to merge with no blockers)
-- Bug fixes needed (regressions, critical issues)
-- Status of maintainer-owned PRs
-
-### 6. Format Output
-
-Structure the recap as Markdown:
-
-```markdown
-# {Repo Name} — Recap {date}
-
-## Recent Releases
-
-| Version | Date | Highlights |
-| ------- | ---- | ---------- |
-
----
-
-## Open PRs ({count} total)
-
-### Our PRs
-
-| PR | Title | Size | Status |
-| -- | ----- | ---- | ------ |
-
-### External — Reviewable
-
-| PR | Author | Title | Size | Status | Action |
-| -- | ------ | ----- | ---- | ------ | ------ |
-
-### External — Problematic
-
-| PR | Author | Title | Size | Problem | Action |
-| -- | ------ | ----- | ---- | ------- | ------ |
-
----
-
-## Open Issues ({count} total)
-
-| # | Author | Subject | Priority |
-| - | ------ | ------- | -------- |
-
----
-
-## Executive Summary
-
-- **Point 1**: ...
-- **Point 2**: ...
-```
-
-**Rules:**
-- All PR/issue numbers as clickable links: `[#123](https://github.com/{owner}/{repo}/pull/123)` for PRs, `.../issues/123` for issues
-- Tables use Markdown pipe syntax
-- Bold for emphasis on actions and risks
-- Cross-reference related PRs and issues (e.g., "Covered by [#131](link)")
-- Truncate long titles to ~60 chars for table readability
-
-**Empty data handling:**
-- 0 open PRs → `No open PRs.`
-- 0 open issues → `No open issues.`
-- 0 releases → `No recent releases.`
-
-### 7. Copy to Clipboard
-
-After displaying the recap, copy it automatically:
-
-```bash
-clip() {
-  if command -v pbcopy &>/dev/null; then pbcopy
-  elif command -v xclip &>/dev/null; then xclip -selection clipboard
-  elif command -v wl-copy &>/dev/null; then wl-copy
-  else cat
-  fi
-}
-
-cat << 'EOF' | clip
-{formatted recap content}
-EOF
-```
-
-Confirm: "Copied to clipboard."
-
-## Notes
-
-- Always derive owner/repo from `gh repo view` — never hardcode
-- Use `gh` CLI for all data gathering (not direct GitHub API calls, except the collaborators endpoint)
-- `author` in gh JSON is an object — always use `.author.login`
-- Keep tables compact — truncate long titles if needed
-- Cross-reference overlapping PRs and related issues whenever possible