monomind 1.19.0 → 2.0.0

package/.claude/skills/monodesign/reference/product.md

@@ -1,62 +0,0 @@
-# Product register
-
-When design SERVES the product: app UIs, admin dashboards, settings panels, data tables, tools, authenticated surfaces, anything where the user is in a task.
-
-## The product slop test
-
-Not "would someone say AI made this." Familiarity is often a feature here. The test is: would a user fluent in the category's best tools (Linear, Figma, Notion, Raycast, Stripe come to mind) sit down and trust this interface, or pause at every subtly-off component?
-
-Product UI's failure mode isn't flatness, it's strangeness without purpose: over-decorated buttons, mismatched form controls, gratuitous motion, display fonts where labels should be, invented affordances for standard tasks. The bar is earned familiarity. The tool should disappear into the task.
-
-## Typography
-
-- **System fonts are legitimate.** `-apple-system, BlinkMacSystemFont, "Segoe UI", system-ui, sans-serif` gives you native feel on every platform. Inter is the common cross-platform default for a reason.
-- **One family is often right.** Product UIs don't need display/body pairing. A well-tuned sans carries headings, buttons, labels, body, data.
-- **Fixed rem scale, not fluid.** Clamp-sized headings don't serve product UI. Users view at consistent DPI, and a fluid h1 that shrinks in a sidebar looks worse, not better.
-- **Tighter scale ratio.** 1.125–1.2 between steps is typical. More type elements here than on brand surfaces; exaggerated contrast creates noise.
-- **Line length still applies for prose** (65–75ch). Data and compact UI can run denser; tables at 120ch+ are fine.
-
-## Color
-
-Product defaults to Restrained. A single surface can earn Committed (a dashboard where one category color carries a report, an onboarding flow with a drenched welcome screen), but Restrained is the floor.
-
-- State-rich semantic vocabulary: hover, focus, active, disabled, selected, loading, error, warning, success, info. Standardize these.
-- Accent color used for primary actions, current selection, and state indicators only, not decoration.
-- A second neutral layer for sidebars, toolbars, and panels (slightly cooler or warmer than the content surface).
-
-## Layout
-
-- Predictable grids. Consistency IS an affordance; users navigate faster when the structure is expected.
-- Familiar patterns are features. Standard navigation (top bar, side nav), breadcrumbs, tabs, and form layouts have established user expectations. Don't reinvent for flavor.
-- Responsive behavior is structural (collapse sidebar, responsive table, breakpoint-driven columns), not fluid typography.
-
-## Components
-
-Every interactive component has: default, hover, focus, active, disabled, loading, error. Don't ship with half of these.
-
-- Skeleton states for loading, not spinners in the middle of content.
-- Empty states that teach the interface, not "nothing here."
-- Consistent affordances across the surface. Same button shape. Same form-control vocabulary. Same icon style.
-
-## Motion
-
-- 150–250 ms on most transitions. Users are in flow; don't make them wait for choreography.
-- Motion conveys state, not decoration. State change, feedback, loading, reveal: nothing else.
-- No orchestrated page-load sequences. Product loads into a task; users don't want to watch it load.
-
-## Product bans (on top of the shared absolute bans)
-
-- Decorative motion that doesn't convey state.
-- Inconsistent component vocabulary across screens. If the "save" button looks different in two places, one is wrong.
-- Display fonts in UI labels, buttons, data.
-- Reinventing standard affordances for flavor (custom scrollbars, weird form controls, non-standard modals).
-- Heavy color or full-saturation accents on inactive states.
-
-## Product permissions
-
-Product can afford things brand surfaces can't.
-
-- System fonts and familiar sans defaults (Inter, SF Pro, system-ui stacks).
-- Standard navigation patterns: top bar + side nav, breadcrumbs, tabs, command palettes.
-- Density. Tables with many rows, panels with many labels, dense information when users need it.
-- Consistency over surprise. The same visual vocabulary screen to screen is a virtue; delight is saved for moments, not pages.

package/.claude/skills/monodesign/reference/quieter.md

@@ -1,99 +0,0 @@
-Quiet design is harder than bold design. Subtlety needs precision. Reduce visual intensity in designs that are too loud, aggressive, or overstimulating without losing personality or making the result generic.
-
----
-
-## Register
-
-Brand: "quieter" means more restrained palette, more whitespace, more typographic air. Drama is reduced, not eliminated; the POV stays intact.
-
-Product: "quieter" means reducing visual noise. Fewer background accents, flatter cards, less color, less motion. The tool should disappear more completely into the task.
-
----
-
-## Assess Current State
-
-Analyze what makes the design feel too intense:
-
-1. **Identify intensity sources**:
-   - **Color saturation**: Overly bright or saturated colors
-   - **Contrast extremes**: Too much high-contrast juxtaposition
-   - **Visual weight**: Too many bold, heavy elements competing
-   - **Animation excess**: Too much motion or overly dramatic effects
-   - **Complexity**: Too many visual elements, patterns, or decorations
-   - **Scale**: Everything is large and loud with no hierarchy
-
-2. **Understand the context**:
-   - What's the purpose? (Marketing vs tool vs reading experience)
-   - Who's the audience? (Some contexts need energy)
-   - What's working? (Don't throw away good ideas)
-   - What's the core message? (Preserve what matters)
-
-If any of these are unclear from the codebase, Ask the user for clarification before proceeding.
-
-**CRITICAL**: "Quieter" doesn't mean boring or generic. It means refined and easier on the eyes. Think luxury, not laziness.
-
-## Plan Refinement
-
-Create a strategy to reduce intensity while maintaining impact:
-
-- **Color approach**: Desaturate or shift to more restrained tones?
-- **Hierarchy approach**: Which elements should stay bold (very few), which should recede?
-- **Simplification approach**: What can be removed entirely?
-- **Sophistication approach**: How can we signal quality through restraint?
-
-**IMPORTANT**: Subtlety requires precision. Quiet without intent collapses to generic.
-
-## Refine the Design
-
-Systematically reduce intensity across these dimensions:
-
-### Color Refinement
-- **Reduce saturation**: Shift from fully saturated to 70-85% saturation
-- **Soften palette**: Replace bright colors with muted tones
-- **Reduce color variety**: Use fewer colors more thoughtfully
-- **Neutral dominance**: Let neutrals do more work, use color as accent (10% rule)
-- **Gentler contrasts**: High contrast only where it matters most
-- **Tinted grays**: Use warm or cool tinted grays instead of pure gray. Adds depth without loudness
-- **Never gray on color**: If you have gray text on a colored background, use a darker shade of that color or transparency instead
-
-### Visual Weight Reduction
-- **Typography**: Reduce font weights (900 → 600, 700 → 500), decrease sizes where appropriate
-- **Hierarchy through subtlety**: Use weight, size, and space instead of color and boldness
-- **White space**: Increase breathing room, reduce density
-- **Borders & lines**: Reduce thickness, decrease opacity, or remove entirely
-
-### Simplification
-- **Remove decorative elements**: Gradients, shadows, patterns, textures that don't serve purpose
-- **Simplify shapes**: Reduce border radius extremes, simplify custom shapes
-- **Reduce layering**: Flatten visual hierarchy where possible
-- **Clean up effects**: Reduce or remove blur effects, glows, multiple shadows
-
-### Motion Reduction
-- **Reduce animation intensity**: Shorter distances (10-20px instead of 40px), gentler easing
-- **Remove decorative animations**: Keep functional motion, remove flourishes
-- **Subtle micro-interactions**: Replace dramatic effects with gentle feedback
-- **Refined easing**: Use ease-out-quart for smooth, understated motion. Never bounce or elastic
-- **Remove animations entirely** if they're not serving a clear purpose
-
-### Composition Refinement
-- **Reduce scale jumps**: Smaller contrast between sizes creates calmer feeling
-- **Align to grid**: Bring rogue elements back into systematic alignment
-- **Even out spacing**: Replace extreme spacing variations with consistent rhythm
-
-**NEVER**:
-- Make everything the same size/weight (hierarchy still matters)
-- Remove all color (quiet ≠ grayscale)
-- Eliminate all personality (maintain character through refinement)
-- Sacrifice usability for aesthetics (functional elements still need clear affordances)
-- Make everything small and light (some anchors needed)
-
-## Verify Quality
-
-Ensure refinement maintains quality:
-
-- **Still functional**: Can users still accomplish tasks easily?
-- **Still distinctive**: Does it have character, or is it generic now?
-- **Better reading**: Is text easier to read for extended periods?
-- **Restrained, not absent**: Does the POV survive the cuts?
-
-When the result feels right, hand off to `/monodesign polish` for the final pass.

package/.claude/skills/monodesign/reference/responsive-design.md

@@ -1,114 +0,0 @@
-# Responsive Design
-
-## Mobile-First: Write It Right
-
-Start with base styles for mobile, use `min-width` queries to layer complexity. Desktop-first (`max-width`) means mobile loads unnecessary styles first.
-
-## Breakpoints: Content-Driven
-
-Don't chase device sizes; let content tell you where to break. Start narrow, stretch until design breaks, add breakpoint there. Three breakpoints usually suffice (640, 768, 1024px). Use `clamp()` for fluid values without breakpoints.
-
-## Detect Input Method, Not Just Screen Size
-
-**Screen size doesn't tell you input method.** A laptop with touchscreen, a tablet with keyboard. Use pointer and hover queries:
-
-```css
-/* Fine pointer (mouse, trackpad) */
-@media (pointer: fine) {
-  .button { padding: 8px 16px; }
-}
-
-/* Coarse pointer (touch, stylus) */
-@media (pointer: coarse) {
-  .button { padding: 12px 20px; }  /* Larger touch target */
-}
-
-/* Device supports hover */
-@media (hover: hover) {
-  .card:hover { transform: translateY(-2px); }
-}
-
-/* Device doesn't support hover (touch) */
-@media (hover: none) {
-  .card { /* No hover state - use active instead */ }
-}
-```
-
-**Critical**: Don't rely on hover for functionality. Touch users can't hover.
-
-## Safe Areas: Handle the Notch
-
-Modern phones have notches, rounded corners, and home indicators. Use `env()`:
-
-```css
-body {
-  padding-top: env(safe-area-inset-top);
-  padding-bottom: env(safe-area-inset-bottom);
-  padding-left: env(safe-area-inset-left);
-  padding-right: env(safe-area-inset-right);
-}
-
-/* With fallback */
-.footer {
-  padding-bottom: max(1rem, env(safe-area-inset-bottom));
-}
-```
-
-**Enable viewport-fit** in your meta tag:
-```html
-<meta name="viewport" content="width=device-width, initial-scale=1, viewport-fit=cover">
-```
-
-## Responsive Images: Get It Right
-
-### srcset with Width Descriptors
-
-```html
-<img
-  src="hero-800.jpg"
-  srcset="
-    hero-400.jpg 400w,
-    hero-800.jpg 800w,
-    hero-1200.jpg 1200w
-  "
-  sizes="(max-width: 768px) 100vw, 50vw"
-  alt="Hero image"
->
-```
-
-**How it works**:
-- `srcset` lists available images with their actual widths (`w` descriptors)
-- `sizes` tells the browser how wide the image will display
-- Browser picks the best file based on viewport width AND device pixel ratio
-
-### Picture Element for Art Direction
-
-When you need different crops/compositions (not just resolutions):
-
-```html
-<picture>
-  <source media="(min-width: 768px)" srcset="wide.jpg">
-  <source media="(max-width: 767px)" srcset="tall.jpg">
-  <img src="fallback.jpg" alt="...">
-</picture>
-```
-
-## Layout Adaptation Patterns
-
-**Navigation**: Three stages: hamburger + drawer on mobile, horizontal compact on tablet, full with labels on desktop. **Tables**: Transform to cards on mobile using `display: block` and `data-label` attributes. **Progressive disclosure**: Use `<details>/<summary>` for content that can collapse on mobile.
-
-## Testing: Don't Trust DevTools Alone
-
-DevTools device emulation is useful for layout but misses:
-
-- Actual touch interactions
-- Real CPU/memory constraints
-- Network latency patterns
-- Font rendering differences
-- Browser chrome/keyboard appearances
-
-**Test on at least**: One real iPhone, one real Android, a tablet if relevant. Cheap Android phones reveal performance issues you'll never see on simulators.
-
----
-
-**Avoid**: Desktop-first design. Device detection instead of feature detection. Separate mobile/desktop codebases. Ignoring tablet and landscape. Assuming all mobile devices are powerful.

package/.claude/skills/monodesign/reference/shape.md

@@ -1,151 +0,0 @@
-Shape the UX and UI for a feature before any code is written. This command produces a **design brief**: a structured artifact that guides implementation through discovery, not guesswork.
-
-**Scope**: Design planning only. This command does NOT write code. It produces the thinking that makes code good.
-
-**Output**: A design brief that can be handed off to /monodesign craft, or directly to /monodesign for freeform implementation. When visual direction probes are used, the images are supporting artifacts, not the primary output.
-
-## Philosophy
-
-Most AI-generated UIs fail not because of bad code, but because of skipped thinking. They jump to "here's a card grid" without asking "what is the user trying to accomplish?" This command inverts that: understand deeply first, so implementation is precise.
-
-## Phase 1: Discovery Interview
-
-**Do NOT write any code or make any design decisions during this phase.** Your only job is to understand the feature deeply enough to make excellent design decisions later.
-
-This is a required interaction, not optional guidance. Ask these questions in conversation, adapting based on answers. Don't dump them all at once; have a natural dialogue. Ask the user for clarification before proceeding.
-
-### Interview cadence
-
-Discovery must include at least one user-answer round unless PRODUCT.md, DESIGN.md, or an already-confirmed brief directly answers the needed design inputs. With a sparse prompt, do **not** synthesize a complete brief for confirmation on the first response.
-
-- Use the harness's structured question tool when one exists. Otherwise, ask directly in chat and stop.
-- Ask **2-3 questions per round**, then wait for answers.
-- Treat PRODUCT.md and DESIGN.md as anchors; they reduce repeated questions but do **not** replace shape for craft. Shape is task-specific.
-- Round 1 should clarify purpose, audience/context, and success or emotional outcome.
-- Round 2 should clarify content/data/states and scope/fidelity.
-- Round 3 should clarify visual direction, constraints, and anti-goals when still unresolved.
-
-### Purpose & Context
-- What is this feature for? What problem does it solve?
-- Who specifically will use it? (Not "users"; be specific: role, context, frequency)
-- What does success look like? How will you know this feature is working?
-- What's the user's state of mind when they reach this feature? (Rushed? Exploring? Anxious? Focused?)
-
-### Content & Data
-- What content or data does this feature display or collect?
-- What are the realistic ranges? (Minimum, typical, maximum, e.g., 0 items, 5 items, 500 items)
-- What are the edge cases? (Empty state, error state, first-time use, power user)
-- Is any content dynamic? What changes and how often?
-
-### Design Direction
-
-Force a visual decision on three fronts. Skip anything PRODUCT.md or DESIGN.md already answers; ask only what's missing.
-
-- **Color strategy for this surface.** Pick one: Restrained / Committed / Full palette / Drenched. Can override the project default if the surface earns it (e.g. a drenched hero inside an otherwise Restrained product).
-- **Theme via scene sentence.** Write one sentence of physical context for this surface: who uses it, where, under what ambient light, in what mood. The sentence forces dark vs light. If it doesn't, add detail until it does.
-- **Two or three named anchor references.** Specific products, brands, objects. Not adjectives like "modern" or "clean."
-
-### Scope
-
-Always ask. Sketch quality and shipped quality are different outputs; don't guess between them.
-
-- **Fidelity.** Sketch / mid-fi / high-fi / production-ready?
-- **Breadth.** One screen / a flow / a whole surface?
-- **Interactivity.** Static visual / interactive prototype / shipped-quality component?
-- **Time intent.** Quick exploration, or polish until it ships?
-
-Scope answers are task-scoped. Don't write them to PRODUCT.md or DESIGN.md; carry them through the design brief only.
-
-### Constraints
-- Are there technical constraints? (Framework, performance budget, browser support)
-- Are there content constraints? (Localization, dynamic text length, user-generated content)
-- Mobile/responsive requirements?
-- Accessibility requirements beyond WCAG AA?
-
-### Anti-Goals
-- What should this NOT be? What would be a wrong direction?
-- What's the biggest risk of getting this wrong?
-
-## Phase 1.5: Visual Direction Probe (Capability-Gated)
-
-After the discovery interview, generate a small set of visual direction probes **before** writing the final brief when all of these are true:
-
-- The work is **net-new** or directionally ambiguous enough that visual exploration will clarify the brief.
-- The requested fidelity is **mid-fi, high-fi, or production-ready**. Skip for sketch-only planning.
-- The current harness has **built-in image generation capability** (for example, Codex with a native image tool). Do **not** ask the user to set up external APIs, shell scripts, or one-off tooling just to do this.
-
-When those conditions are met, this step is mandatory for Codex and any harness with built-in image generation. Use native image generation; in Codex, use the built-in `image_gen` tool via the imagegen skill. If image generation is unavailable, do not ask the user to install APIs or tooling. State in one line that the image step is skipped because the harness lacks native image generation, then proceed.
-
-Use probes to explore visual lanes, not to replace the brief.
-
-Do not skip probes because the final UI will be semantic, editable, code-native, responsive, or accessible. Those are implementation requirements, not reasons to avoid visual exploration.
-
-### What to generate
-
-Generate **2 to 4** distinct direction probes based on the discovery answers, especially:
-
-- Color strategy
-- Theme scene sentence
-- Named anchor references
-- Scope and fidelity
-
-The probes should differ in primary visual direction (hierarchy, topology, density, typographic voice, or color strategy), not just palette tweaks.
-
-### How to use the probes
-
-- Treat them as **direction tests**, not final designs.
-- Use them to pressure-test whether the brief is pointing at the right lane.
-- Ask the user which direction feels closest, what feels off, and what should carry forward.
-- If the probes reveal a mismatch, revise the brief inputs before finalizing the brief.
-
-### Important limits
-
-- Do **not** skip discovery because image generation is available.
-- Do **not** treat generated imagery as final UX specification, final copy, or final accessibility behavior.
-- Do **not** use this step for minor refinements of existing work. It's for shaping a new surface or clarifying a big directional choice.
-
-If image generation is unavailable, or the task doesn't benefit from it, skip this phase only with a one-line reason and proceed directly to the design brief.
-
-## Phase 2: Design Brief
-
-After the interview and any required probes, synthesize everything into a structured design brief. Present it to the user for explicit confirmation before considering this command complete. Stop after asking for confirmation; do not proceed to craft or implementation in the same response unless the user has already approved the brief.
-
-### Brief Structure
-
-**1. Feature Summary** (2-3 sentences)
-What this is, who it's for, what it needs to accomplish.
-
-**2. Primary User Action**
-The single most important thing a user should do or understand here.
-
-**3. Design Direction**
-Color strategy (Restrained / Committed / Full palette / Drenched) + the theme scene sentence + 2–3 named anchor references. Reference PRODUCT.md and DESIGN.md where they already answer, and note any per-surface overrides.
-
-If you ran the Visual Direction Probe step, name which probe direction won and what changed in the brief because of it.
-
-**4. Scope**
-Fidelity, breadth, interactivity, and time intent from the Scope section of the interview. Task-scoped; these don't persist beyond the brief.
-
-**5. Layout Strategy**
-High-level spatial approach: what gets emphasis, what's secondary, how information flows. Describe the visual hierarchy and rhythm, not specific CSS.
-
-**6. Key States**
-List every state the feature needs: default, empty, loading, error, success, edge cases. For each, note what the user needs to see and feel.
-
-**7. Interaction Model**
-How users interact with this feature. What happens on click, hover, scroll? What feedback do they get? What's the flow from entry to completion?
-
-**8. Content Requirements**
-What copy, labels, empty state messages, error messages, and microcopy are needed. Note any dynamic content and its realistic ranges.
-
-**9. Recommended References**
-Based on the brief, list which impeccable reference files would be most valuable during implementation (e.g., spatial-design.md for complex layouts, motion-design.md for animated features, interaction-design.md for form-heavy features).
-
-**10. Open Questions**
-Anything unresolved that the implementer should resolve during build.
-
----
-
-Ask the user for clarification before proceeding. Ask for explicit confirmation of the brief before finishing. If the user disagrees with any part, revisit the relevant discovery questions. A shape run is incomplete until the brief is confirmed.
-
-Once confirmed, the brief is complete. The user can now hand it to /monodesign, or use it to guide any other implementation approach. (If the user wants the full discovery-then-build flow in one step, they should use /monodesign craft instead, which runs this command internally.)

package/.claude/skills/monodesign/reference/spatial-design.md

@@ -1,100 +0,0 @@
-# Spatial Design
-
-## Spacing Systems
-
-### Use 4pt Base, Not 8pt
-
-8pt systems are too coarse; you'll frequently need 12px (between 8 and 16). Use 4pt for granularity: 4, 8, 12, 16, 24, 32, 48, 64, 96px.
-
-### Name Tokens Semantically
-
-Name by relationship (`--space-sm`, `--space-lg`), not value (`--spacing-8`). Use `gap` instead of margins for sibling spacing; it eliminates margin collapse and cleanup hacks.
-
-## Grid Systems
-
-### The Self-Adjusting Grid
-
-Use `repeat(auto-fit, minmax(280px, 1fr))` for responsive grids without breakpoints. Columns are at least 280px, as many as fit per row, leftovers stretch. For complex layouts, use named grid areas (`grid-template-areas`) and redefine them at breakpoints.
-
-## Visual Hierarchy
-
-### The Squint Test
-
-Blur your eyes (or screenshot and blur). Can you still identify:
-- The most important element?
-- The second most important?
-- Clear groupings?
-
-If everything looks the same weight blurred, you have a hierarchy problem.
-
-### Hierarchy Through Multiple Dimensions
-
-Don't rely on size alone. Combine:
-
-| Tool | Strong Hierarchy | Weak Hierarchy |
-|------|------------------|----------------|
-| **Size** | 3:1 ratio or more | <2:1 ratio |
-| **Weight** | Bold vs Regular | Medium vs Regular |
-| **Color** | High contrast | Similar tones |
-| **Position** | Top/left (primary) | Bottom/right |
-| **Space** | Surrounded by white space | Crowded |
-
-**The best hierarchy uses 2-3 dimensions at once**: A heading that's larger, bolder, AND has more space above it.
-
-### Cards Are Not Required
-
-Cards are overused. Spacing and alignment create visual grouping naturally. Use cards only when content is truly distinct and actionable, items need visual comparison in a grid, or content needs clear interaction boundaries. **Never nest cards inside cards.** Use spacing, typography, and subtle dividers for hierarchy within a card.
-
-## Container Queries
-
-Viewport queries are for page layouts. **Container queries are for components**:
-
-```css
-.card-container {
-  container-type: inline-size;
-}
-
-.card {
-  display: grid;
-  gap: var(--space-md);
-}
-
-/* Card layout changes based on its container, not viewport */
-@container (min-width: 400px) {
-  .card {
-    grid-template-columns: 120px 1fr;
-  }
-}
-```
-
-**Why this matters**: A card in a narrow sidebar stays compact, while the same card in a main content area expands automatically, without viewport hacks.
-
-## Optical Adjustments
-
-Text at `margin-left: 0` looks indented due to letterform whitespace; use negative margin (`-0.05em`) to optically align. Geometrically centered icons often look off-center; play icons need to shift right, arrows shift toward their direction.
-
-### Touch Targets vs Visual Size
-
-Buttons can look small but need large touch targets (44px minimum). Use padding or pseudo-elements:
-
-```css
-.icon-button {
-  width: 24px;  /* Visual size */
-  height: 24px;
-  position: relative;
-}
-
-.icon-button::before {
-  content: '';
-  position: absolute;
-  inset: -10px;  /* Expand tap target to 44px */
-}
-```
-
-## Depth & Elevation
-
-Create semantic z-index scales (dropdown → sticky → modal-backdrop → modal → toast → tooltip) instead of arbitrary numbers. For shadows, create a consistent elevation scale (sm → md → lg → xl). **Key insight**: Shadows should be subtle. If you can clearly see it, it's probably too strong.
-
----
-
-**Avoid**: Arbitrary spacing values outside your scale. Making all spacing equal (variety creates hierarchy). Creating hierarchy through size alone - combine size, weight, color, and space.