mirai-graph 1.3.0 → 2.1.0

package/pilots/independent-implementation-003-ai-employee-workflow/graph-seed.json

@@ -1,90 +0,0 @@
-{
-  "schema_version": "0.1.0",
-  "seed_id": "seed.ai_employee_workflow_pilot",
-  "target_graph_id": "graph.ai_employee_workflow_pilot",
-  "purpose": "Create a public-safe Mirai Graph package for a governed AI employee workflow.",
-  "target_profile": "profile.ai_employee",
-  "target_mode": "pilot",
-  "graph_dna": {
-    "purpose": "Keep AI employee role, capability, policy, action, result, feedback and learning boundaries connected.",
-    "evolution_vector": "Grow from a small support-triage assistant graph into a governed AI department or federated service model.",
-    "non_negotiable_principles": [
-      "The pilot must remain synthetic and public-safe.",
-      "External or user-visible actions must be modeled as proposed actions until approval is recorded.",
-      "Feedback and lessons must not update behavior automatically."
-    ]
-  },
-  "source_boundaries": {
-    "allowed_sources": [
-      "synthetic support triage scenario",
-      "public Mirai Graph AI employee profile",
-      "public Mirai Graph implementation-control boundaries"
-    ],
-    "excluded_sources": [
-      "real customer tickets",
-      "private employee records",
-      "production runtime traces",
-      "secrets or credentials"
-    ],
-    "canonical_write_allowed": false
-  },
-  "growth_rules": {
-    "allowed_object_families": [
-      "ai_employee",
-      "ai_department",
-      "role",
-      "skill",
-      "knowledge",
-      "memory",
-      "tool",
-      "capability",
-      "policy",
-      "governance_gate",
-      "workflow",
-      "action",
-      "result",
-      "feedback",
-      "lesson",
-      "federation_endpoint",
-      "evidence"
-    ],
-    "allowed_relation_families": [
-      "belongs_to_department",
-      "has_role",
-      "has_skill",
-      "uses_knowledge",
-      "requires_capability",
-      "can_execute",
-      "requires_approval",
-      "governs",
-      "triggered_by",
-      "produces",
-      "responds_to",
-      "learns_from",
-      "updates_behavior",
-      "federates_with"
-    ],
-    "max_initial_objects": 18,
-    "depth_mode": "standard"
-  },
-  "review_gates": [
-    "human_review_before_canonical_write",
-    "approval_before_external_action",
-    "feedback_learning_before_behavior_update",
-    "public_safety_before_release"
-  ],
-  "generated_views": [
-    "role_capability_view",
-    "approval_boundary_view",
-    "feedback_learning_view",
-    "federation_view",
-    "next_action_view"
-  ],
-  "stop_conditions": [
-    "real_customer_data_requested",
-    "action_modeled_as_executed_without_approval",
-    "feedback_directly_changes_behavior",
-    "secret_or_credential_detected"
-  ]
-}
-

package/pilots/independent-implementation-003-ai-employee-workflow/graph.json

@@ -1,37 +0,0 @@
-{
-  "$schema": "https://mirai-graph.dev/schemas/graph-manifest.schema.json",
-  "format": "mirai-graph",
-  "schema_version": "2.0.0",
-  "id": "package.ai_employee_workflow_pilot_003",
-  "aliases": [],
-  "title": "AI Employee Workflow Pilot 003",
-  "scope": "package",
-  "kind": "graph_package",
-  "owner": "mirai-graph",
-  "profiles": [
-    "ai_employee"
-  ],
-  "graph": {
-    "root": "graph",
-    "source_of_truth": [
-      "graph"
-    ],
-    "objects": [
-      "graph/objects.json"
-    ],
-    "relations": [
-      "graph/relations.json"
-    ],
-    "schemas": [],
-    "generated": [],
-    "raw_sources": [
-      "README.md"
-    ]
-  },
-  "imports": [],
-  "version": "0.1.0",
-  "conformance_level": "level_1",
-  "description": "A synthetic independent implementation pilot for a governed AI employee workflow.",
-  "license": "CC-BY-4.0",
-  "public_safety": "synthetic_public"
-}

package/pilots/independent-implementation-003-ai-employee-workflow/reports/pilot-report.md

@@ -1,49 +0,0 @@
-# Pilot Report: AI Employee Workflow
-
-Status: public-safe alpha pilot
-
-## Question
-
-Can Mirai Graph represent an AI employee workflow as an executable governance
-surface rather than a prompt-only agent description?
-
-## Setup
-
-The pilot uses a synthetic customer-support triage assistant. The graph connects:
-
-- AI employee and department;
-- role and skill;
-- knowledge and reviewed memory;
-- tool and capability;
-- proposed action and approval gate;
-- audited result, feedback and lesson proposal;
-- optional federation endpoint.
-
-## Result
-
-The package validates against the public `ai_employee` profile. The graph keeps
-the action/runtime boundary explicit: the assistant may prepare a proposed
-customer response, but the graph does not treat that proposal as an executed
-action.
-
-## Evidence Boundary
-
-This pilot demonstrates public profile applicability and validation shape. It
-does not claim production safety, customer-support quality, model accuracy or
-peer-reviewed effectiveness.
-
-## Reproducibility
-
-```bash
-node packages/cli/validate-mirai-graph.js seed pilots/independent-implementation-003-ai-employee-workflow/graph-seed.json
-node packages/cli/validate-mirai-graph.js pilots/independent-implementation-003-ai-employee-workflow
-node packages/cli/validate-mirai-graph.js --markdown pilots/independent-implementation-003-ai-employee-workflow
-```
-
-## Limitations
-
-- The scenario is synthetic.
-- No real customer tickets or runtime traces are included.
-- The current CLI checks conformance and boundaries, not runtime behavior.
-- Feedback remains a proposal source and does not authorize canonical update.
-

package/pilots/independent-implementation-003-ai-employee-workflow/results/profile-conformance-result.json

@@ -1,30 +0,0 @@
-{
-  "schema_version": "0.1.0",
-  "result_id": "profile_conformance.package.ai_employee_workflow_pilot_003",
-  "checked_at": "2026-06-03",
-  "fixture": "pilots/independent-implementation-003-ai-employee-workflow/",
-  "package_id": "package.ai_employee_workflow_pilot_003",
-  "profile": "ai_employee",
-  "conformance_level": "level_1",
-  "validator": "packages/cli/validate-mirai-graph.js",
-  "command": "node packages/cli/validate-mirai-graph.js pilots/independent-implementation-003-ai-employee-workflow",
-  "valid": true,
-  "errors": [],
-  "warnings": [],
-  "checks": [
-    "required package, object, relation and gate-result fields",
-    "unique object and relation ids",
-    "relation source and target existence",
-    "relation id consistency",
-    "readiness and gate verdict values",
-    "ai_employee object-kind conformance",
-    "ai_employee relation-type conformance",
-    "approval boundary represented for user-visible action",
-    "feedback links to lesson proposal without automatic behavior update"
-  ],
-  "claim_supported": "The package follows the declared Mirai Graph profile shape checked by the current validator.",
-  "limitations": [
-    "The pilot is synthetic and does not prove production AI employee effectiveness.",
-    "The validator checks graph conformance, not runtime safety or model quality."
-  ]
-}

package/pilots/independent-implementation-004-research-program/README.md

@@ -1,41 +0,0 @@
-# Independent Implementation Pilot 004: Research Program
-
-Status: pilot fixture
-
-## Purpose
-
-This pilot tests whether Mirai Graph can model a small research-program workflow
-with explicit evidence, milestones, risks and publication gates.
-
-## Domain
-
-Synthetic research program for evaluating a graph-assisted project workflow.
-
-No private research repository, unpublished manuscript, reviewer note, customer
-data, internal handoff or runtime trace is used.
-
-## Research Question
-
-Can a developer model a public-safe research program as a governed Mirai Graph
-package using only public profiles, examples and validators?
-
-## Files
-
-- `graph-seed.json`
-- `graph.json`
-- `graph/objects.json`
-- `graph/relations.json`
-- `gates/results.json`
-- `results/profile-conformance-result.json`
-- `reports/pilot-report.md`
-
-## Commands
-
-Run from repository root:
-
-```bash
-node packages/cli/validate-mirai-graph.js seed pilots/independent-implementation-004-research-program/graph-seed.json
-node packages/cli/validate-mirai-graph.js pilots/independent-implementation-004-research-program
-node packages/cli/validate-mirai-graph.js --markdown pilots/independent-implementation-004-research-program
-```
-

package/pilots/independent-implementation-004-research-program/gates/results.json

@@ -1,21 +0,0 @@
-[
-  {
-    "id": "gate_result.research_program.public_safety",
-    "gate_id": "public_safety_before_release",
-    "target_id": "package.research_program_pilot_004",
-    "verdict": "pass",
-    "summary": "The pilot uses synthetic public-safe research-program material only.",
-    "reviewed_at": "2026-06-03",
-    "evidence": ["evidence.research_program_brief"]
-  },
-  {
-    "id": "gate_result.research_program.claim_boundary",
-    "gate_id": "evidence_review_before_publication_claim",
-    "target_id": "decision.limit_claim_to_alpha_evidence",
-    "verdict": "pass_with_notes",
-    "summary": "The graph explicitly blocks overclaiming synthetic evidence as broad scientific proof.",
-    "reviewed_at": "2026-06-03",
-    "evidence": ["evidence.research_program_brief"]
-  }
-]
-

package/pilots/independent-implementation-004-research-program/graph/objects.json

@@ -1,102 +0,0 @@
-[
-  {
-    "id": "evidence.research_program_brief",
-    "kind": "evidence",
-    "title": "Synthetic Research Program Brief",
-    "summary": "Public-safe brief for a synthetic research program about graph-assisted work.",
-    "readiness": "accepted",
-    "evidence": [],
-    "profile": "project_management"
-  },
-  {
-    "id": "system.graph_assisted_work_research",
-    "kind": "system",
-    "title": "Graph-Assisted Work Research",
-    "summary": "Synthetic research program used to evaluate Mirai Graph-style project control.",
-    "readiness": "review_ready",
-    "evidence": ["evidence.research_program_brief"],
-    "profile": "project_management"
-  },
-  {
-    "id": "goal.measure_context_quality",
-    "kind": "goal",
-    "title": "Measure Context Quality",
-    "summary": "Evaluate whether graph-generated context improves dependency and evidence coverage.",
-    "readiness": "review_ready",
-    "evidence": ["evidence.research_program_brief"],
-    "profile": "project_management"
-  },
-  {
-    "id": "task.define_baseline_protocol",
-    "kind": "task",
-    "title": "Define Baseline Protocol",
-    "summary": "Define a baseline-vs-Mirai Graph comparison protocol for one synthetic task.",
-    "readiness": "accepted",
-    "evidence": ["evidence.research_program_brief"],
-    "profile": "project_management"
-  },
-  {
-    "id": "task.collect_synthetic_result",
-    "kind": "task",
-    "title": "Collect Synthetic Result",
-    "summary": "Record context size, missed dependencies, unsupported assumptions and evidence coverage.",
-    "readiness": "review_ready",
-    "evidence": ["evidence.research_program_brief"],
-    "profile": "project_management"
-  },
-  {
-    "id": "evidence.synthetic_result_table",
-    "kind": "evidence",
-    "title": "Synthetic Result Table",
-    "summary": "Synthetic metric table used for reproducibility and limitation review.",
-    "readiness": "review_ready",
-    "evidence": ["evidence.research_program_brief"],
-    "profile": "project_management"
-  },
-  {
-    "id": "risk.overclaiming_synthetic_result",
-    "kind": "risk",
-    "title": "Overclaiming Synthetic Result",
-    "summary": "Synthetic evidence may be mistaken for broad scientific proof.",
-    "readiness": "review_ready",
-    "evidence": ["evidence.research_program_brief"],
-    "profile": "project_management"
-  },
-  {
-    "id": "decision.limit_claim_to_alpha_evidence",
-    "kind": "decision",
-    "title": "Limit Claim To Alpha Evidence",
-    "summary": "Publication wording must separate synthetic evidence, pilot evidence and scientific proof.",
-    "readiness": "accepted",
-    "evidence": ["evidence.research_program_brief"],
-    "profile": "project_management"
-  },
-  {
-    "id": "gate.publication_claim_review",
-    "kind": "governance_gate",
-    "title": "Publication Claim Review Gate",
-    "summary": "Review gate before treating synthetic or pilot evidence as a publication claim.",
-    "readiness": "accepted",
-    "evidence": ["evidence.research_program_brief"],
-    "profile": "project_management"
-  },
-  {
-    "id": "milestone.preprint_outline_ready",
-    "kind": "milestone",
-    "title": "Preprint Outline Ready",
-    "summary": "Milestone reached when protocol, limitations and evidence boundaries are documented.",
-    "readiness": "review_ready",
-    "evidence": ["evidence.synthetic_result_table"],
-    "profile": "project_management"
-  },
-  {
-    "id": "stakeholder.research_reviewer",
-    "kind": "stakeholder",
-    "title": "Research Reviewer",
-    "summary": "Reviewer role responsible for checking limitations and claim boundaries.",
-    "readiness": "draft",
-    "evidence": ["evidence.research_program_brief"],
-    "profile": "project_management"
-  }
-]
-

package/pilots/independent-implementation-004-research-program/graph/relations.json

@@ -1,84 +0,0 @@
-[
-  {
-    "id": "relation.system.graph_assisted_work_research.supports.goal.measure_context_quality",
-    "type": "supports",
-    "source": "system.graph_assisted_work_research",
-    "target": "goal.measure_context_quality",
-    "readiness": "review_ready",
-    "evidence": ["evidence.research_program_brief"],
-    "profile": "project_management"
-  },
-  {
-    "id": "relation.task.define_baseline_protocol.depends_on.goal.measure_context_quality",
-    "type": "depends_on",
-    "source": "task.define_baseline_protocol",
-    "target": "goal.measure_context_quality",
-    "readiness": "accepted",
-    "evidence": ["evidence.research_program_brief"],
-    "profile": "project_management"
-  },
-  {
-    "id": "relation.task.collect_synthetic_result.depends_on.task.define_baseline_protocol",
-    "type": "depends_on",
-    "source": "task.collect_synthetic_result",
-    "target": "task.define_baseline_protocol",
-    "readiness": "review_ready",
-    "evidence": ["evidence.research_program_brief"],
-    "profile": "project_management"
-  },
-  {
-    "id": "relation.evidence.synthetic_result_table.evidences.task.collect_synthetic_result",
-    "type": "evidences",
-    "source": "evidence.synthetic_result_table",
-    "target": "task.collect_synthetic_result",
-    "readiness": "review_ready",
-    "evidence": ["evidence.synthetic_result_table"],
-    "profile": "project_management"
-  },
-  {
-    "id": "relation.risk.overclaiming_synthetic_result.blocks.milestone.preprint_outline_ready",
-    "type": "blocks",
-    "source": "risk.overclaiming_synthetic_result",
-    "target": "milestone.preprint_outline_ready",
-    "readiness": "review_ready",
-    "evidence": ["evidence.research_program_brief"],
-    "profile": "project_management"
-  },
-  {
-    "id": "relation.decision.limit_claim_to_alpha_evidence.blocks.risk.overclaiming_synthetic_result",
-    "type": "blocks",
-    "source": "decision.limit_claim_to_alpha_evidence",
-    "target": "risk.overclaiming_synthetic_result",
-    "readiness": "accepted",
-    "evidence": ["evidence.research_program_brief"],
-    "profile": "project_management"
-  },
-  {
-    "id": "relation.gate.publication_claim_review.governs.decision.limit_claim_to_alpha_evidence",
-    "type": "governs",
-    "source": "gate.publication_claim_review",
-    "target": "decision.limit_claim_to_alpha_evidence",
-    "readiness": "accepted",
-    "evidence": ["evidence.research_program_brief"],
-    "profile": "project_management"
-  },
-  {
-    "id": "relation.milestone.preprint_outline_ready.depends_on.gate.publication_claim_review",
-    "type": "depends_on",
-    "source": "milestone.preprint_outline_ready",
-    "target": "gate.publication_claim_review",
-    "readiness": "review_ready",
-    "evidence": ["evidence.synthetic_result_table"],
-    "profile": "project_management"
-  },
-  {
-    "id": "relation.stakeholder.research_reviewer.related_to.gate.publication_claim_review",
-    "type": "related_to",
-    "source": "stakeholder.research_reviewer",
-    "target": "gate.publication_claim_review",
-    "readiness": "draft",
-    "evidence": ["evidence.research_program_brief"],
-    "profile": "project_management"
-  }
-]
-

package/pilots/independent-implementation-004-research-program/graph-seed.json

@@ -1,76 +0,0 @@
-{
-  "schema_version": "0.1.0",
-  "seed_id": "seed.research_program_pilot",
-  "target_graph_id": "graph.research_program_pilot",
-  "purpose": "Create a public-safe Mirai Graph package for a small research-program workflow.",
-  "target_profile": "profile.project_management",
-  "target_mode": "pilot",
-  "graph_dna": {
-    "purpose": "Keep research questions, evidence, milestones, risks and publication gates connected.",
-    "evolution_vector": "Grow from a small synthetic research workflow into a reproducible evidence package.",
-    "non_negotiable_principles": [
-      "The pilot must remain synthetic and public-safe.",
-      "Evidence must stay separate from scientific proof claims.",
-      "Publication readiness requires explicit review gates."
-    ]
-  },
-  "source_boundaries": {
-    "allowed_sources": [
-      "synthetic research program brief",
-      "public Mirai Graph research docs",
-      "public Mirai Graph project-management profile"
-    ],
-    "excluded_sources": [
-      "private research repository files",
-      "unpublished reviewer notes",
-      "internal handoff text",
-      "customer or employee data",
-      "secrets or credentials"
-    ],
-    "canonical_write_allowed": false
-  },
-  "growth_rules": {
-    "allowed_object_families": [
-      "system",
-      "goal",
-      "task",
-      "decision",
-      "risk",
-      "milestone",
-      "stakeholder",
-      "evidence",
-      "governance_gate"
-    ],
-    "allowed_relation_families": [
-      "depends_on",
-      "blocks",
-      "supports",
-      "evidences",
-      "belongs_to",
-      "governs",
-      "related_to"
-    ],
-    "max_initial_objects": 14,
-    "depth_mode": "standard"
-  },
-  "review_gates": [
-    "human_review_before_canonical_write",
-    "public_safety_before_release",
-    "evidence_review_before_publication_claim",
-    "limitations_review_before_preprint"
-  ],
-  "generated_views": [
-    "research_question_view",
-    "evidence_map",
-    "risk_and_limitations_view",
-    "publication_gate_view",
-    "next_action_view"
-  ],
-  "stop_conditions": [
-    "private_research_data_requested",
-    "scientific_claim_without_evidence_boundary",
-    "publication_ready_without_review_gate",
-    "secret_or_credential_detected"
-  ]
-}
-

package/pilots/independent-implementation-004-research-program/graph.json

@@ -1,37 +0,0 @@
-{
-  "$schema": "https://mirai-graph.dev/schemas/graph-manifest.schema.json",
-  "format": "mirai-graph",
-  "schema_version": "2.0.0",
-  "id": "package.research_program_pilot_004",
-  "aliases": [],
-  "title": "Research Program Pilot 004",
-  "scope": "package",
-  "kind": "graph_package",
-  "owner": "mirai-graph",
-  "profiles": [
-    "project_management"
-  ],
-  "graph": {
-    "root": "graph",
-    "source_of_truth": [
-      "graph"
-    ],
-    "objects": [
-      "graph/objects.json"
-    ],
-    "relations": [
-      "graph/relations.json"
-    ],
-    "schemas": [],
-    "generated": [],
-    "raw_sources": [
-      "README.md"
-    ]
-  },
-  "imports": [],
-  "version": "0.1.0",
-  "conformance_level": "level_1",
-  "description": "A synthetic independent implementation pilot for a governed research-program workflow.",
-  "license": "CC-BY-4.0",
-  "public_safety": "synthetic_public"
-}

package/pilots/independent-implementation-004-research-program/reports/pilot-report.md

@@ -1,50 +0,0 @@
-# Pilot Report: Research Program
-
-Status: public-safe alpha pilot
-
-## Question
-
-Can Mirai Graph model a research-program workflow with evidence, limitations,
-publication gates and anti-overclaiming controls?
-
-## Setup
-
-The pilot uses a synthetic research program for evaluating graph-assisted work.
-The graph connects:
-
-- research system and goal;
-- baseline protocol task;
-- synthetic result evidence;
-- overclaiming risk;
-- claim-limiting decision;
-- publication claim review gate;
-- preprint readiness milestone.
-
-## Result
-
-The package validates against the public `project_management` profile. The graph
-shows how a research workflow can keep evidence, risks, limitations and
-publication gates explicit without claiming that synthetic evidence is
-peer-reviewed proof.
-
-## Evidence Boundary
-
-This pilot demonstrates public profile applicability and validation shape. It
-does not claim scientific effectiveness, external validity, publication
-acceptance or peer-reviewed proof.
-
-## Reproducibility
-
-```bash
-node packages/cli/validate-mirai-graph.js seed pilots/independent-implementation-004-research-program/graph-seed.json
-node packages/cli/validate-mirai-graph.js pilots/independent-implementation-004-research-program
-node packages/cli/validate-mirai-graph.js --markdown pilots/independent-implementation-004-research-program
-```
-
-## Limitations
-
-- The scenario is synthetic.
-- No private research materials are included.
-- The example models research-program control, not detailed scientific method.
-- Evidence remains bounded and does not authorize broad claims.
-

package/pilots/independent-implementation-004-research-program/results/profile-conformance-result.json

@@ -1,30 +0,0 @@
-{
-  "schema_version": "0.1.0",
-  "result_id": "profile_conformance.package.research_program_pilot_004",
-  "checked_at": "2026-06-03",
-  "fixture": "pilots/independent-implementation-004-research-program/",
-  "package_id": "package.research_program_pilot_004",
-  "profile": "project_management",
-  "conformance_level": "level_1",
-  "validator": "packages/cli/validate-mirai-graph.js",
-  "command": "node packages/cli/validate-mirai-graph.js pilots/independent-implementation-004-research-program",
-  "valid": true,
-  "errors": [],
-  "warnings": [],
-  "checks": [
-    "required package, object, relation and gate-result fields",
-    "unique object and relation ids",
-    "relation source and target existence",
-    "relation id consistency",
-    "readiness and gate verdict values",
-    "project_management object-kind conformance",
-    "project_management relation-type conformance",
-    "publication claim boundary represented through risk, decision and gate"
-  ],
-  "claim_supported": "The package follows the declared Mirai Graph profile shape checked by the current validator.",
-  "limitations": [
-    "The pilot is synthetic and does not prove scientific effectiveness.",
-    "The project_management profile models the research workflow structure, not domain-specific research methodology."
-  ]
-}
-