mindsystem-cc 4.3.0 → 4.3.1

This diff represents the content of publicly available package versions that have been released to one of the supported registries. The information contained in this diff is provided for informational purposes only and reflects changes between package versions as they appear in their respective public registries.
package/README.md CHANGED
@@ -2,9 +2,9 @@
2
2
 
3
3
  # MINDSYSTEM
4
4
 
5
- **The engineer's meta-prompting system for Claude Code.**
5
+ **The full-cycle development system for Claude Code.**
6
6
 
7
- Amplifies every step of the development workflow you already follow — discovery, research, design, planning, execution, verification. Each one refined, parallelized, and compounded into persistent knowledge. Built for engineers who want to multiply their output without giving up control.
7
+ In lean teams and solo ventures, the person writing the code is also the person deciding what to build, researching the domain, picking the layout, and verifying the result. Mindsystem amplifies each of those steps, making them deeper and faster — discovery, research, design, planning, execution, verification so one person can cover the full cycle without cutting corners. What it learns carries forward, so phase 10 knows everything phase 1 figured out.
8
8
 
9
9
  ```bash
10
10
  npx mindsystem-cc
@@ -27,17 +27,17 @@ npx mindsystem-cc
27
27
 
28
28
  ## Why Mindsystem
29
29
 
30
- Fully autonomous coding tools take a spec and run for hours until a product emerges. That works for prototypes and one-shot projects.
30
+ Larger organizations split product delivery across specialists — product owners, designers, researchers, QA engineers. Autonomous coding tools try to replace that entire chain with a single prompt. Both approaches lose something: the first requires headcount, the second loses your judgment.
31
31
 
32
- Mindsystem takes the opposite approach. It follows the same workflow a thorough engineer already uses — and amplifies each step:
32
+ Mindsystem is the middle ground. Each specialist role maps to a phase you control:
33
33
 
34
- | What you'd do manually | What Mindsystem does |
35
- |---|---|
36
- | Talk through requirements, catch misalignment early | **Discuss phase** surfaces assumptions with confidence levels, forces tradeoff decisions before any code gets written |
37
- | Google libraries, read a few docs | **Research phase** runs 3 parallel agents across documentation, your codebase, and community practices — 10x more sources, synthesized in minutes |
38
- | Try design directions, pick the best one | **Design phase** generates parallel HTML/CSS mockups with side-by-side comparison and exact design tokens |
39
- | Plan from what you remember about the codebase | **Plan phase** loads knowledge files capturing every decision, pattern, and pitfall from prior phases |
40
- | Figure out what states to test, mock them manually | **Verify work** determines mock states automatically — you validate visually or programmatically |
34
+ | The role | What you'd do | What Mindsystem does |
35
+ |---|---|---|
36
+ | **Product owner** | Talk through requirements, catch misalignment early | **Discuss phase** surfaces assumptions with confidence levels, forces tradeoff decisions before any code gets written |
37
+ | **Technical researcher** | Google libraries, read a few docs | **Research phase** runs 3 parallel agents across documentation, your codebase, and community practices — 10x more sources, synthesized in minutes |
38
+ | **Designer** | Try design directions, pick the best one | **Design phase** generates parallel HTML/CSS mockups with side-by-side comparison and exact design tokens |
39
+ | **Tech lead** | Plan from what you remember about the codebase | **Plan phase** loads knowledge files capturing every decision, pattern, and pitfall from prior phases |
40
+ | **QA engineer** | Figure out what states to test, mock them manually | **Verify work** determines mock states automatically — you validate visually or programmatically |
41
41
 
42
42
  The workflow stays yours. Each step finishes in minutes instead of hours. Everything learned compounds into knowledge that survives context resets — phase 10 starts with everything the project learned from phases 1–9.
43
43
 
@@ -2,7 +2,7 @@
2
2
  name: ms-compounder
3
3
  description: Compounds raw code changes into per-subsystem knowledge files. Spawned by compound workflow.
4
4
  model: sonnet
5
- tools: Read, Write, Bash, Grep, Glob
5
+ tools: Read, Edit, Write, Bash, Grep, Glob
6
6
  color: yellow
7
7
  ---
8
8
 
@@ -71,23 +71,23 @@ Focus on:
71
71
 
72
72
  ## Step 4: Merge Into Existing Knowledge
73
73
 
74
- For each affected subsystem, merge extracted content into the knowledge file:
74
+ For each affected subsystem, edit the knowledge file to reflect current state:
75
75
 
76
- - **Decisions:** Add new entries, update superseded decisions, remove contradicted ones.
77
- - **Architecture:** Update structural descriptions with new components and patterns.
78
- - **Design:** Add new specs, update changed specs.
79
- - **Pitfalls:** Add new entries, deduplicate with existing.
80
- - **Key Files:** Add new paths, remove renamed or deleted files.
76
+ - **Decisions:** Append new entries. Edit superseded decisions in place. Delete contradicted ones.
77
+ - **Architecture:** Edit structural descriptions with new components and patterns.
78
+ - **Design:** Append new specs, edit changed specs.
79
+ - **Pitfalls:** Append new entries. Delete duplicates of existing entries.
80
+ - **Key Files:** Append new paths, delete renamed or deleted files.
81
81
 
82
- Rewrite the full filenot append. The result is the current state of knowledge.
82
+ Use `Edit` for existing files targeted changes preserve content you haven't inspected. Use `Write` only for new files (subsystem has no knowledge file yet).
83
83
 
84
- ## Step 5: Write Knowledge Files and Return Report
84
+ ## Step 5: Update Knowledge Files and Return Report
85
85
 
86
86
  ```bash
87
87
  mkdir -p .planning/knowledge/
88
88
  ```
89
89
 
90
- Write one file per affected subsystem. Follow the template format from `~/.claude/mindsystem/templates/knowledge.md`. Omit sections with no content.
90
+ For new subsystems (no existing file), use `Write` to create the file following the template format from `~/.claude/mindsystem/templates/knowledge.md`. For existing files, all changes should already be applied via `Edit` in step 4. Omit empty sections.
91
91
 
92
92
  Return a structured report to the compound workflow.
93
93
 
@@ -123,11 +123,11 @@ If changes suggest a subsystem not in the confirmed list, note it as a proposal
123
123
 
124
124
  **Preserve rationale.** The "because" part is the value. Decisions without rationale are just facts.
125
125
 
126
- **Rewrite, not append.** Each update produces the current state. Superseded decisions get updated, not duplicated.
126
+ **Edit to reflect current state.** Update superseded decisions, remove outdated patterns, append new entries. Use `Edit` for existing files, `Write` only for new files.
127
127
 
128
128
  **Omit empty sections.** If a subsystem has no design work, do not include a Design section.
129
129
 
130
- **No commits.** Write files only — the compound workflow orchestrator handles commits.
130
+ **No commits.** Edit/write files only — the compound workflow orchestrator handles commits.
131
131
 
132
132
  **Only write files for confirmed affected subsystems.** Do not invent subsystems or write knowledge files for subsystems not in the confirmed list.
133
133
 
@@ -136,7 +136,8 @@ If changes suggest a subsystem not in the confirmed list, note it as a proposal
136
136
  </critical_rules>
137
137
 
138
138
  <success_criteria>
139
- - [ ] Merge uses rewrite semantics (update, remove, deduplicate not just add)
139
+ - [ ] Existing files modified via Edit (not Write)targeted changes, no full-file replacement
140
+ - [ ] Merge reflects current state (update, remove, deduplicate — not just append)
140
141
  - [ ] No commits made
141
142
  - [ ] Report returned with update counts
142
143
  - [ ] Empty sections omitted from knowledge files
@@ -2,7 +2,7 @@
2
2
  name: ms-consolidator
3
3
  description: Consolidates phase artifacts into per-subsystem knowledge files. Spawned by execute-phase after plan execution.
4
4
  model: sonnet
5
- tools: Read, Write, Bash, Grep, Glob
5
+ tools: Read, Edit, Write, Bash, Grep, Glob
6
6
  color: yellow
7
7
  ---
8
8
 
@@ -137,25 +137,25 @@ Extract knowledge, not descriptions. "Using React" is not knowledge. "Using Reac
137
137
 
138
138
  ## Step 6: Merge Into Knowledge Files
139
139
 
140
- For each affected subsystem, merge extracted content into the knowledge file:
140
+ For each affected subsystem, edit the knowledge file to reflect current state:
141
141
 
142
- - **Decisions:** Add new entries, update superseded decisions, remove contradicted ones.
143
- - **Architecture:** Update structural descriptions with new components and patterns.
144
- - **Design:** Add new specs, update changed specs.
145
- - **Pitfalls:** Add new entries, deduplicate with existing.
146
- - **Key Files:** Add new paths, remove renamed or deleted files.
142
+ - **Decisions:** Append new entries. Edit superseded decisions in place. Delete contradicted ones.
143
+ - **Architecture:** Edit structural descriptions with new components and patterns.
144
+ - **Design:** Append new specs, edit changed specs.
145
+ - **Pitfalls:** Append new entries. Delete duplicates of existing entries.
146
+ - **Key Files:** Append new paths, delete renamed or deleted files.
147
147
 
148
- Rewrite the full filenot append. The result is the current state of knowledge.
148
+ Use `Edit` for existing files targeted changes preserve content you haven't inspected. Use `Write` only for new files (subsystem has no knowledge file yet).
149
149
 
150
- ## Step 7: Write Knowledge Files
150
+ ## Step 7: Update Knowledge Files
151
151
 
152
152
  ```bash
153
153
  mkdir -p .planning/knowledge/
154
154
  ```
155
155
 
156
- Write one file per affected subsystem. Follow the template format from `~/.claude/mindsystem/templates/knowledge.md`. Omit sections with no content.
156
+ For new subsystems (no existing file), use `Write` to create the file following the template format from `~/.claude/mindsystem/templates/knowledge.md`. For existing files, all changes should already be applied via `Edit` in step 6. Omit empty sections.
157
157
 
158
- Only write files for subsystems found in SUMMARY.md frontmatter.
158
+ Only update files for subsystems found in SUMMARY.md frontmatter.
159
159
 
160
160
  ## Step 8: Delete PLAN.md Files
161
161
 
@@ -203,7 +203,7 @@ Use `+N` for new entries added, `updated` for sections rewritten with changes, `
203
203
 
204
204
  **Preserve rationale.** The "because" part is the value. Decisions without rationale are just facts.
205
205
 
206
- **Rewrite, not append.** Each consolidation produces the current state. Superseded decisions get updated, not duplicated.
206
+ **Edit to reflect current state.** Update superseded decisions, remove outdated patterns, append new entries. Use `Edit` for existing files, `Write` only for new files.
207
207
 
208
208
  **Handle missing files gracefully.** Not all phases have CONTEXT, DESIGN, or RESEARCH files. This is normal.
209
209
 
@@ -220,7 +220,8 @@ Use `+N` for new entries added, `updated` for sections rewritten with changes, `
220
220
  <success_criteria>
221
221
  - [ ] Subsystem alignment validated against config.json
222
222
  - [ ] Content extracted and distributed per extraction guide
223
- - [ ] Knowledge files written to `.planning/knowledge/`
223
+ - [ ] Existing knowledge files modified via Edit (not Write) — targeted changes, no full-file replacement
224
+ - [ ] New knowledge files created with Write in `.planning/knowledge/`
224
225
  - [ ] Empty sections omitted from knowledge files
225
226
  - [ ] PLAN.md files deleted from phase directory
226
227
  - [ ] CONTEXT.md, DESIGN.md, RESEARCH.md, SUMMARY.md preserved
@@ -148,10 +148,6 @@ Add the new phase entry to the roadmap:
148
148
  **Design focus**: {focus} ← only if Likely
149
149
  **Research**: {Likely (reason) | Unlikely (reason)}
150
150
  **Research topics**: {topics} ← only if Likely
151
- **Plans:** 0 plans
152
-
153
- Plans:
154
- - [ ] TBD (run /ms:plan-phase {N} to break down)
155
151
 
156
152
  **Details:**
157
153
  [To be added during planning]
@@ -145,14 +145,14 @@ Then route based on status:
145
145
  | Status | Route |
146
146
  |--------|-------|
147
147
  | `gaps_found` | Route C (gap closure) |
148
- | `passed` + more phases | Route A (verify + next phase) |
148
+ | `passed` + more phases | Route A (verify) |
149
149
  | `passed` + last phase | Route B (verify + milestone complete) |
150
150
 
151
151
  Thoroughness by default: verify-work is the primary "Next Up" in both routes. Assess skip context per workflow `offer_next` step.
152
152
 
153
153
  ---
154
154
 
155
- **Route A: Phase verified, more phases remain**
155
+ **Shared steps (Routes A and B):**
156
156
 
157
157
  1. Show phase completion summary:
158
158
  ```
@@ -174,26 +174,33 @@ All {Y} plans finished. Phase goal verified.
174
174
  {If skip context: "Phase involved only {description} with no user-facing changes — skip if structural verification is sufficient."}
175
175
  ```
176
176
 
177
- 4. Read `~/.claude/mindsystem/references/routing/next-phase-routing.md` to determine the most appropriate command for Phase {Z+1}. Present next phase context and options:
178
- ```
179
- **Phase {Z+1}: {Name}** — {Goal}
180
- {If pre-work flagged: brief note about recommendations}
177
+ **Then branch by route:**
181
178
 
182
- **Also available:**
183
- - `/ms:{suggested} {Z+1}` — {reason}
184
- - `/ms:plan-phase {Z+1}` — skip pre-work, plan directly
185
- ```
179
+ **Route A: More phases remain**
186
180
 
187
- ---
181
+ 4. **If skip context applies:** Determine next phase's primary suggestion:
182
+ - From ROADMAP.md (already in context), get Phase {Z+1} pre-work flags
183
+ - Check: CONTEXT.md exists? DESIGN.md? RESEARCH.md? in next phase dir
184
+ - Priority: discuss (if Likely + no CONTEXT.md) > design (if Likely + no DESIGN.md) > research (if Likely + no RESEARCH.md) > plan-phase
185
+ - Present ONE "Also available" entry:
186
+ ```
187
+ ---
188
+ **Also available:**
189
+ - `/ms:{suggested} {Z+1}` — skip verify, start Phase {Z+1}: {Name}
190
+ ---
191
+ ```
192
+ **If skip context does NOT apply:** No "Also available" — verify-work is the sole suggestion.
188
193
 
189
- **Route B: Phase verified, milestone complete**
194
+ **Route B: Milestone complete**
190
195
 
191
- Follow Route A steps 1-3, then present milestone options:
196
+ 4. Present milestone options:
192
197
  ```
198
+ ---
193
199
  **Also available:**
194
200
  - `/ms:audit-milestone` — verify requirements, cross-phase integration, E2E flows
195
201
  - `/ms:complete-milestone` — skip audit, archive directly
196
202
  - `/ms:add-phase <description>` — add another phase first
203
+ ---
197
204
  ```
198
205
 
199
206
  ---
@@ -163,10 +163,6 @@ Insert the new phase entry into the roadmap:
163
163
  **Design focus**: {focus} ← only if Likely
164
164
  **Research**: {Likely (reason) | Unlikely (reason)}
165
165
  **Research topics**: {topics} ← only if Likely
166
- **Plans:** 0 plans
167
-
168
- Plans:
169
- - [ ] TBD (run /ms:plan-phase {decimal_phase} to break down)
170
166
 
171
167
  **Details:**
172
168
  [To be added during planning]
@@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
1
1
  # Next Phase Routing
2
2
 
3
- Reference for presenting "Next Up" guidance for a phase. Used by progress (current phase), execute-phase (next phase), and verify-work (next phase).
3
+ Reference for presenting "Next Up" guidance for a phase. Used by progress (current phase) and verify-work (next phase).
4
4
 
5
5
  ## Purpose
6
6
 
@@ -66,7 +66,7 @@ Template for `.planning/knowledge/{subsystem}.md` — per-subsystem knowledge fi
66
66
  - **Architecture and Design use prose bullets.** Describe how things work, not tables.
67
67
  - **Pitfalls use bold titles** for scannability.
68
68
  - **Key Files is a flat list.** No nesting, no grouping.
69
- - **Rewrite semantics, not append.** Each consolidation produces the current state. Superseded decisions get updated. Outdated patterns get removed. The file is always current.
69
+ - **Edit to reflect current state.** Each update produces the current state through targeted edits — update superseded decisions, remove outdated patterns, append new entries. Use `Edit` for existing files, `Write` only for new files. Never replace an entire knowledge file via `Write`.
70
70
 
71
71
  ## Cross-Reference Pattern
72
72
 
@@ -10,8 +10,6 @@ This template is used by the complete-milestone workflow to create archive files
10
10
 
11
11
  **Status:** ✅ SHIPPED {{DATE}}
12
12
  **Phases:** {{PHASE_START}}-{{PHASE_END}}
13
- **Total Plans:** {{TOTAL_PLANS}}
14
-
15
13
  ## Overview
16
14
 
17
15
  {{MILESTONE_DESCRIPTION}}
@@ -26,13 +24,6 @@ This template is used by the complete-milestone workflow to create archive files
26
24
 
27
25
  **Goal**: {{PHASE_GOAL}}
28
26
  **Depends on**: {{DEPENDS_ON}}
29
- **Plans**: {{PLAN_COUNT}} plans
30
-
31
- Plans:
32
-
33
- - [x] {{PHASE}}-01: {{PLAN_DESCRIPTION}}
34
- - [x] {{PHASE}}-02: {{PLAN_DESCRIPTION}}
35
- [... all plans ...]
36
27
 
37
28
  **Details:**
38
29
  {{PHASE_DETAILS_FROM_ROADMAP}}
@@ -43,11 +34,6 @@ Plans:
43
34
 
44
35
  **Goal**: Fix authentication bypass vulnerability
45
36
  **Depends on**: Phase 2
46
- **Plans**: 1 plan
47
-
48
- Plans:
49
-
50
- - [x] 02.1-01: Patch auth vulnerability
51
37
 
52
38
  **Details:**
53
39
  {{PHASE_DETAILS_FROM_ROADMAP}}
@@ -18,12 +18,6 @@ Template for reorganizing `ROADMAP.md` after first milestone ships. Collapse com
18
18
 
19
19
  ### Phase 1: [Name]
20
20
  **Goal**: [What this phase delivers]
21
- **Plans**: 3 plans
22
-
23
- Plans:
24
- - [x] 01-01: [Brief description]
25
- - [x] 01-02: [Brief description]
26
- - [x] 01-03: [Brief description]
27
21
 
28
22
  [... remaining phases ...]
29
23
 
@@ -36,11 +30,6 @@ Plans:
36
30
  #### Phase 5: [Name]
37
31
  **Goal**: [What this phase delivers]
38
32
  **Depends on**: Phase 4
39
- **Plans**: 2 plans
40
-
41
- Plans:
42
- - [ ] 05-01: [Brief description]
43
- - [ ] 05-02: [Brief description]
44
33
 
45
34
  [... remaining phases ...]
46
35
 
@@ -52,11 +41,11 @@ Plans:
52
41
 
53
42
  ## Progress
54
43
 
55
- | Phase | Milestone | Plans Complete | Status | Completed |
56
- |-------|-----------|----------------|--------|-----------|
57
- | 1. Foundation | MVP | 3/3 | Complete | YYYY-MM-DD |
58
- | 2. Features | MVP | 2/2 | Complete | YYYY-MM-DD |
59
- | 5. Security | Security & Polish | 0/2 | Not started | - |
44
+ | Phase | Milestone | Status | Completed |
45
+ |-------|-----------|--------|-----------|
46
+ | 1. Foundation | MVP | Complete | YYYY-MM-DD |
47
+ | 2. Features | MVP | Complete | YYYY-MM-DD |
48
+ | 5. Security | Security & Polish | Not started | - |
60
49
  ```
61
50
 
62
51
  **Notes:**
@@ -52,12 +52,6 @@ Decimal phases appear between their surrounding integers in numeric order.
52
52
  **Discuss**: Unlikely (mechanical setup, zero design decisions)
53
53
  **Design**: Unlikely (backend only)
54
54
  **Research**: Unlikely (established patterns)
55
- **Plans**: [Number of plans, e.g., "3 plans" or "TBD"]
56
-
57
- Plans:
58
- - [ ] 01-01: [Brief description of first plan]
59
- - [ ] 01-02: [Brief description of second plan]
60
- - [ ] 01-03: [Brief description of third plan]
61
55
 
62
56
  ### Phase 2: [Name]
63
57
  **Goal**: [What this phase delivers]
@@ -72,21 +66,12 @@ Plans:
72
66
  **Design focus**: [What to design]
73
67
  **Research**: Likely (new integration)
74
68
  **Research topics**: [What needs investigating]
75
- **Plans**: [Number of plans]
76
-
77
- Plans:
78
- - [ ] 02-01: [Brief description]
79
- - [ ] 02-02: [Brief description]
80
69
 
81
70
  ### Phase 2.1: Critical Fix (INSERTED)
82
71
  **Goal**: [Urgent work inserted between phases]
83
72
  **Depends on**: Phase 2
84
73
  **Success Criteria** (what must be TRUE):
85
74
  1. [What the fix achieves]
86
- **Plans**: 1 plan
87
-
88
- Plans:
89
- - [ ] 02.1-01: [Description]
90
75
 
91
76
  ### Phase 3: [Name]
92
77
  **Goal**: [What this phase delivers]
@@ -101,11 +86,6 @@ Plans:
101
86
  **Design**: Unlikely (API only)
102
87
  **Research**: Likely (external API)
103
88
  **Research topics**: [What needs investigating]
104
- **Plans**: [Number of plans]
105
-
106
- Plans:
107
- - [ ] 03-01: [Brief description]
108
- - [ ] 03-02: [Brief description]
109
89
 
110
90
  ### Phase 4: [Name]
111
91
  **Goal**: [What this phase delivers]
@@ -118,22 +98,18 @@ Plans:
118
98
  **Discuss topics**: [Priority rules, batch vs individual, error recovery]
119
99
  **Design**: Unlikely (backend only)
120
100
  **Research**: Unlikely (internal patterns)
121
- **Plans**: [Number of plans]
122
-
123
- Plans:
124
- - [ ] 04-01: [Brief description]
125
101
 
126
102
  ## Progress
127
103
 
128
104
  **Execution Order:**
129
105
  Phases execute in numeric order: 2 → 2.1 → 2.2 → 3 → 3.1 → 4
130
106
 
131
- | Phase | Plans Complete | Status | Completed |
132
- |-------|----------------|--------|-----------|
133
- | 1. [Name] | 0/3 | Not started | - |
134
- | 2. [Name] | 0/2 | Not started | - |
135
- | 3. [Name] | 0/2 | Not started | - |
136
- | 4. [Name] | 0/1 | Not started | - |
107
+ | Phase | Status | Completed |
108
+ |-------|--------|-----------|
109
+ | 1. [Name] | Not started | - |
110
+ | 2. [Name] | Not started | - |
111
+ | 3. [Name] | Not started | - |
112
+ | 4. [Name] | Not started | - |
137
113
  ```
138
114
 
139
115
  <guidelines>
@@ -145,11 +121,9 @@ Phases execute in numeric order: 2 → 2.1 → 2.2 → 3 → 3.1 → 4
145
121
  **Initial planning:**
146
122
  - Phase count derived from actual work (not a target number)
147
123
  - Each phase delivers something coherent
148
- - Phases can have 1+ plans (split by orchestrator judgment — multiple subsystems, context budget, vertical slices)
149
124
  - Plans use naming: {phase}-{plan}-PLAN.md (e.g., 01-02-PLAN.md)
150
125
  - No time estimates (this isn't enterprise PM)
151
126
  - Progress table updated by execute workflow
152
- - Plan count can be "TBD" initially, refined during planning
153
127
 
154
128
  **Success criteria:**
155
129
  - 2-5 observable behaviors per phase (from user's perspective)
@@ -345,7 +345,6 @@ Extract completed milestone details and create archive file.
345
345
  - {{DATE}} — Today's date
346
346
  - {{PHASE_START}} — First phase number in milestone
347
347
  - {{PHASE_END}} — Last phase number in milestone
348
- - {{TOTAL_PLANS}} — Count of all plans in milestone
349
348
  - {{MILESTONE_DESCRIPTION}} — From ROADMAP.md overview
350
349
  - {{PHASES_SECTION}} — Full phase details extracted
351
350
  - {{DECISIONS_FROM_PROJECT}} — Key decisions from PROJECT.md
@@ -315,7 +315,7 @@ Spawn a `general-purpose` subagent (Task tool) with the following structured pro
315
315
  > - Preserve rationale when visible in code comments or config. Do not fabricate reasons.
316
316
  > - Do not fabricate specific numbers (limits, thresholds, counts) — read from source or omit.
317
317
  > - Omit empty sections. No Design section if subsystem has no UI.
318
- > - Rewrite semanticsif existing knowledge files exist, merge by producing current state.
318
+ > - Edit to reflect current state use `Edit` for existing knowledge files (targeted changes), `Write` only for new files.
319
319
  > - Cross-reference between subsystems where relevant: "(see api subsystem)".
320
320
  > - Decisions table: 5-10 words per cell. Source column: `"existing"` for source code mode, artifact reference for artifact mode.
321
321
  > - Key files must reference actual paths verified to exist.
@@ -539,24 +539,24 @@ All {Y} plans finished. Phase goal verified.
539
539
 
540
540
  **Then present "Also available" based on milestone status:**
541
541
 
542
- **If more phases remain:**
542
+ **If more phases remain AND skip context applies:**
543
543
 
544
- Read `~/.claude/mindsystem/references/routing/next-phase-routing.md` to determine the most appropriate command for the next phase (discuss/design/research/plan based on pre-work flags). Present concisely under "Also available":
544
+ Determine the next phase's primary suggestion inline do NOT read next-phase-routing.md:
545
+ - From ROADMAP.md (already in context), get Phase {Z+1} pre-work flags
546
+ - Check: CONTEXT.md exists? DESIGN.md? RESEARCH.md? in next phase dir
547
+ - Priority: discuss (if Likely + no CONTEXT.md) > design (if Likely + no DESIGN.md) > research (if Likely + no RESEARCH.md) > plan-phase
548
+ - Present ONE "Also available" entry:
545
549
 
546
550
  ```markdown
547
551
  ---
548
-
549
- **Phase {Z+1}: {Name}** — {Goal}
550
- {If pre-work flagged: brief note about recommendations}
551
-
552
552
  **Also available:**
553
- - `/ms:{suggested} {Z+1}` — {reason from routing}
554
- - `/ms:plan-phase {Z+1}` — skip pre-work, plan directly
555
-
553
+ - `/ms:{suggested} {Z+1}` — skip verify, start Phase {Z+1}: {Name}
556
554
  ---
557
555
  ```
558
556
 
559
- Include the pre-work recommendations table from the routing reference if any pre-work is flagged as "Likely".
557
+ **If more phases remain but skip context does NOT apply:** No "Also available" — verify-work is the sole suggestion.
558
+
559
+ Do NOT present pre-work recommendation tables or multiple cross-phase alternatives. Cross-phase routing belongs to verify-work and progress.
560
560
 
561
561
  **If milestone complete:**
562
562
 
@@ -97,7 +97,6 @@ Update the file:
97
97
 
98
98
  - Mark current phase: `[x] Complete`
99
99
  - Add completion date
100
- - Update plan count to final (e.g., "3/3 plans complete")
101
100
  - Update Progress table
102
101
  - Keep next phase as `[ ] Not started`
103
102
 
@@ -112,11 +111,11 @@ Update the file:
112
111
 
113
112
  ## Progress
114
113
 
115
- | Phase | Plans Complete | Status | Completed |
116
- | ----------------- | -------------- | ----------- | ---------- |
117
- | 1. Foundation | 3/3 | Complete | 2025-01-15 |
118
- | 2. Authentication | 0/2 | Not started | - |
119
- | 3. Core Features | 0/1 | Not started | - |
114
+ | Phase | Status | Completed |
115
+ | ----------------- | ----------- | ---------- |
116
+ | 1. Foundation | Complete | 2025-01-15 |
117
+ | 2. Authentication | Not started | - |
118
+ | 3. Core Features | Not started | - |
120
119
  ```
121
120
 
122
121
  </step>
@@ -442,7 +441,6 @@ Respect user judgment — they know if work matters.
442
441
 
443
442
  **If marking complete with incomplete plans:**
444
443
 
445
- - Update ROADMAP: "2/3 plans complete" (not "3/3")
446
444
  - Note in transition message which plans were skipped
447
445
 
448
446
  </partial_completion>
@@ -453,7 +451,7 @@ Transition is complete when:
453
451
 
454
452
  - [ ] Current phase plan summaries verified (all exist or user chose to skip)
455
453
  - [ ] Any stale handoffs deleted
456
- - [ ] ROADMAP.md updated with completion status and plan count
454
+ - [ ] ROADMAP.md updated with completion status
457
455
  - [ ] PROJECT.md evolved (requirements, decisions, description if needed)
458
456
  - [ ] STATE.md updated (position, project reference, context, session)
459
457
  - [ ] Progress table updated
@@ -365,24 +365,21 @@ This knowledge informs investigation (where to look, known pitfalls) and any sub
365
365
  3. Check git log for recent changes to relevant files
366
366
  ```
367
367
 
368
- **2. Determine if cause is found:**
368
+ **2. Report finding and act:**
369
369
 
370
- **If cause found AND fix is simple (single file, straightforward change):**
371
- - Propose fix in plain language:
372
- ```
373
- Found the issue. In `ErrorBanner.tsx` line 42, the error message is
374
- hardcoded to "Something went wrong" instead of using the actual error
375
- from the API response.
370
+ State the root cause and the fix in plain language before applying. This lets the user capture the lesson in persistent instructions or catch a wrong direction before reviewing the diff. No confirmation needed — go straight to fixing.
376
371
 
377
- I'll change it to use `error.message` from props.
372
+ Format:
373
+ ```
374
+ {Root cause — what the code does wrong and why, 1-2 sentences}
378
375
 
379
- Apply this fix?
380
- ```
381
- - Present options: [Yes / Let me see the code first / Different approach]
382
- - If approved: Go to `apply_fix`
376
+ Fix: {what the fix changes, 1-2 sentences}
377
+ ```
378
+
379
+ **If fix is simple (single file, straightforward change):**
380
+ - Go to `apply_fix` immediately
383
381
 
384
- **If cause found BUT fix is complex (multiple files, architectural):**
385
- - Report finding
382
+ **If fix is complex (multiple files, architectural):**
386
383
  - Spawn ms-verify-fixer subagent (go to `escalate_to_fixer`)
387
384
 
388
385
  **If cause NOT found after 2-3 checks:**
package/package.json CHANGED
@@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
1
1
  {
2
2
  "name": "mindsystem-cc",
3
- "version": "4.3.0",
3
+ "version": "4.3.1",
4
4
  "description": "The engineer's meta-prompting system for Claude Code.",
5
5
  "bin": {
6
6
  "mindsystem-cc": "bin/install.js"