mindforge-cc 11.7.1 → 11.8.1
This diff represents the content of publicly available package versions that have been released to one of the supported registries. The information contained in this diff is provided for informational purposes only and reflects changes between package versions as they appear in their respective public registries.
- package/.agent/mindforge/wf-accessibility-audit.md +31 -0
- package/.agent/mindforge/wf-ai-model-eval.md +31 -0
- package/.agent/mindforge/wf-api-contract-test.md +31 -0
- package/.agent/mindforge/wf-api-migration.md +31 -0
- package/.agent/mindforge/wf-architecture-modernization.md +32 -0
- package/.agent/mindforge/wf-catalog.md +25 -3
- package/.agent/mindforge/wf-code-explainer.md +31 -0
- package/.agent/mindforge/wf-competitive-teardown.md +31 -0
- package/.agent/mindforge/wf-cost-analysis.md +31 -0
- package/.agent/mindforge/wf-data-pipeline-validate.md +31 -0
- package/.agent/mindforge/wf-database-migration.md +31 -0
- package/.agent/mindforge/wf-debug-detective.md +32 -0
- package/.agent/mindforge/wf-dependency-health.md +31 -0
- package/.agent/mindforge/wf-design-system-audit.md +31 -0
- package/.agent/mindforge/wf-documentation-gen.md +31 -0
- package/.agent/mindforge/wf-multi-repo-sync.md +31 -0
- package/.agent/mindforge/wf-mutation-testing.md +31 -0
- package/.agent/mindforge/wf-security-hardening.md +32 -0
- package/.agent/mindforge/wf-security-threat-model.md +31 -0
- package/.agent/mindforge/wf-test-coverage-gap.md +31 -0
- package/.agent/mindforge/wf-ux-heuristic-audit.md +31 -0
- package/.agent/mindforge/wf-writer-reviewer.md +30 -0
- package/.claude/commands/mindforge/wf-accessibility-audit.md +31 -0
- package/.claude/commands/mindforge/wf-ai-model-eval.md +31 -0
- package/.claude/commands/mindforge/wf-api-contract-test.md +31 -0
- package/.claude/commands/mindforge/wf-api-migration.md +31 -0
- package/.claude/commands/mindforge/wf-architecture-modernization.md +32 -0
- package/.claude/commands/mindforge/wf-catalog.md +25 -3
- package/.claude/commands/mindforge/wf-code-explainer.md +31 -0
- package/.claude/commands/mindforge/wf-competitive-teardown.md +31 -0
- package/.claude/commands/mindforge/wf-cost-analysis.md +31 -0
- package/.claude/commands/mindforge/wf-data-pipeline-validate.md +31 -0
- package/.claude/commands/mindforge/wf-database-migration.md +31 -0
- package/.claude/commands/mindforge/wf-debug-detective.md +32 -0
- package/.claude/commands/mindforge/wf-dependency-health.md +31 -0
- package/.claude/commands/mindforge/wf-design-system-audit.md +31 -0
- package/.claude/commands/mindforge/wf-documentation-gen.md +31 -0
- package/.claude/commands/mindforge/wf-multi-repo-sync.md +31 -0
- package/.claude/commands/mindforge/wf-mutation-testing.md +31 -0
- package/.claude/commands/mindforge/wf-security-hardening.md +32 -0
- package/.claude/commands/mindforge/wf-security-threat-model.md +31 -0
- package/.claude/commands/mindforge/wf-test-coverage-gap.md +31 -0
- package/.claude/commands/mindforge/wf-ux-heuristic-audit.md +31 -0
- package/.claude/commands/mindforge/wf-writer-reviewer.md +30 -0
- package/.mindforge/config.json +2 -2
- package/.mindforge/dynamic-workflows/REGISTRY.md +57 -60
- package/.mindforge/dynamic-workflows/index.json +730 -59
- package/.mindforge/dynamic-workflows/scripts/accessibility-audit.js +119 -0
- package/.mindforge/dynamic-workflows/scripts/ai-model-eval.js +82 -0
- package/.mindforge/dynamic-workflows/scripts/api-contract-test.js +114 -0
- package/.mindforge/dynamic-workflows/scripts/api-migration.js +156 -0
- package/.mindforge/dynamic-workflows/scripts/architecture-modernization.js +111 -0
- package/.mindforge/dynamic-workflows/scripts/code-explainer.js +138 -0
- package/.mindforge/dynamic-workflows/scripts/competitive-teardown.js +142 -0
- package/.mindforge/dynamic-workflows/scripts/cost-analysis.js +107 -0
- package/.mindforge/dynamic-workflows/scripts/data-pipeline-validate.js +69 -0
- package/.mindforge/dynamic-workflows/scripts/database-migration.js +113 -0
- package/.mindforge/dynamic-workflows/scripts/debug-detective.js +124 -0
- package/.mindforge/dynamic-workflows/scripts/dependency-health.js +110 -0
- package/.mindforge/dynamic-workflows/scripts/design-system-audit.js +115 -0
- package/.mindforge/dynamic-workflows/scripts/documentation-gen.js +91 -0
- package/.mindforge/dynamic-workflows/scripts/multi-repo-sync.js +63 -0
- package/.mindforge/dynamic-workflows/scripts/mutation-testing.js +148 -0
- package/.mindforge/dynamic-workflows/scripts/security-hardening.js +154 -0
- package/.mindforge/dynamic-workflows/scripts/security-threat-model.js +159 -0
- package/.mindforge/dynamic-workflows/scripts/test-coverage-gap.js +95 -0
- package/.mindforge/dynamic-workflows/scripts/ux-heuristic-audit.js +122 -0
- package/.mindforge/dynamic-workflows/scripts/writer-reviewer.js +85 -0
- package/.mindforge/memory/sync-manifest.json +1 -1
- package/CHANGELOG.md +43 -0
- package/MINDFORGE.md +2 -2
- package/README.md +42 -5
- package/RELEASENOTES.md +36 -0
- package/SECURITY.md +9 -0
- package/bin/autonomous/auto-runner.js +8 -2
- package/bin/autonomous/dependency-dag.js +1 -1
- package/bin/browser/session-manager.js +3 -1
- package/bin/governance/ztai-manager.js +6 -0
- package/bin/memory/eis-client.js +6 -2
- package/bin/spawn-agent.js +10 -7
- package/bin/sre/sli-verifier.js +9 -1
- package/bin/workflows/workflow-runner.js +18 -2
- package/docs/commands-reference.md +40 -14
- package/docs/getting-started.md +13 -1
- package/docs/sdk-reference.md +13 -1
- package/docs/troubleshooting.md +9 -0
- package/docs/user-guide.md +20 -1
- package/package.json +1 -1
- package/.agent/mindforge/wf-deep-research.md +0 -32
- package/.claude/commands/mindforge/wf-deep-research.md +0 -32
- package/.mindforge/dynamic-workflows/scripts/deep-research.js +0 -151
|
@@ -1,19 +1,4 @@
|
|
|
1
1
|
[
|
|
2
|
-
{
|
|
3
|
-
"name": "deep-research",
|
|
4
|
-
"description": "Fan-out web research with adversarial claim verification and cited synthesis",
|
|
5
|
-
"whenToUse": "When you need a deep, multi-source, fact-checked research report on any topic",
|
|
6
|
-
"tier": "research",
|
|
7
|
-
"command": "/mindforge:wf-deep-research",
|
|
8
|
-
"scriptPath": ".mindforge/dynamic-workflows/scripts/deep-research.js",
|
|
9
|
-
"phases": [
|
|
10
|
-
{ "title": "Scope", "detail": "Decompose question into 5 search angles" },
|
|
11
|
-
{ "title": "Search", "detail": "5 parallel web search agents" },
|
|
12
|
-
{ "title": "Fetch", "detail": "Dedup URLs, fetch top 15 sources, extract claims" },
|
|
13
|
-
{ "title": "Verify", "detail": "3-vote adversarial verification per claim" },
|
|
14
|
-
{ "title": "Synthesize", "detail": "Merge dupes, rank by confidence, cite sources" }
|
|
15
|
-
]
|
|
16
|
-
},
|
|
17
2
|
{
|
|
18
3
|
"name": "competitive-analysis",
|
|
19
4
|
"description": "Multi-angle competitive research producing a SWOT and positioning summary",
|
|
@@ -22,10 +7,22 @@
|
|
|
22
7
|
"command": "/mindforge:wf-competitive-analysis",
|
|
23
8
|
"scriptPath": ".mindforge/dynamic-workflows/scripts/competitive-analysis.js",
|
|
24
9
|
"phases": [
|
|
25
|
-
{
|
|
26
|
-
|
|
27
|
-
|
|
28
|
-
|
|
10
|
+
{
|
|
11
|
+
"title": "Scope",
|
|
12
|
+
"detail": "Define target and 5 research angles"
|
|
13
|
+
},
|
|
14
|
+
{
|
|
15
|
+
"title": "Research",
|
|
16
|
+
"detail": "Parallel research: product / pricing / reviews / community / roadmap"
|
|
17
|
+
},
|
|
18
|
+
{
|
|
19
|
+
"title": "SWOT",
|
|
20
|
+
"detail": "Synthesize strengths, weaknesses, opportunities, threats"
|
|
21
|
+
},
|
|
22
|
+
{
|
|
23
|
+
"title": "Position",
|
|
24
|
+
"detail": "Produce positioning recommendations"
|
|
25
|
+
}
|
|
29
26
|
]
|
|
30
27
|
},
|
|
31
28
|
{
|
|
@@ -36,10 +33,100 @@
|
|
|
36
33
|
"command": "/mindforge:wf-tech-evaluation",
|
|
37
34
|
"scriptPath": ".mindforge/dynamic-workflows/scripts/tech-evaluation.js",
|
|
38
35
|
"phases": [
|
|
39
|
-
{
|
|
40
|
-
|
|
41
|
-
|
|
42
|
-
|
|
36
|
+
{
|
|
37
|
+
"title": "Scope",
|
|
38
|
+
"detail": "Define candidates and evaluation criteria"
|
|
39
|
+
},
|
|
40
|
+
{
|
|
41
|
+
"title": "Evaluate",
|
|
42
|
+
"detail": "5 parallel dimension agents per candidate"
|
|
43
|
+
},
|
|
44
|
+
{
|
|
45
|
+
"title": "Score",
|
|
46
|
+
"detail": "Build weighted scoring matrix"
|
|
47
|
+
},
|
|
48
|
+
{
|
|
49
|
+
"title": "Recommend",
|
|
50
|
+
"detail": "Produce ranked recommendation with trade-offs"
|
|
51
|
+
}
|
|
52
|
+
]
|
|
53
|
+
},
|
|
54
|
+
{
|
|
55
|
+
"name": "ai-model-eval",
|
|
56
|
+
"description": "4-parallel model benchmark agents → scoring matrix → cost/performance recommendation",
|
|
57
|
+
"whenToUse": "When choosing between AI models or providers for a use case",
|
|
58
|
+
"tier": "research",
|
|
59
|
+
"command": "/mindforge:wf-ai-model-eval",
|
|
60
|
+
"scriptPath": ".mindforge/dynamic-workflows/scripts/ai-model-eval.js",
|
|
61
|
+
"phases": [
|
|
62
|
+
{
|
|
63
|
+
"title": "Scope",
|
|
64
|
+
"detail": "Define evaluation criteria and test prompts for the use case"
|
|
65
|
+
},
|
|
66
|
+
{
|
|
67
|
+
"title": "Benchmark",
|
|
68
|
+
"detail": "4 parallel model evaluators (quality / reasoning / speed / cost)"
|
|
69
|
+
},
|
|
70
|
+
{
|
|
71
|
+
"title": "Score",
|
|
72
|
+
"detail": "Scoring matrix across all dimensions"
|
|
73
|
+
},
|
|
74
|
+
{
|
|
75
|
+
"title": "Recommend",
|
|
76
|
+
"detail": "Ranked recommendation with break-even cost analysis"
|
|
77
|
+
}
|
|
78
|
+
]
|
|
79
|
+
},
|
|
80
|
+
{
|
|
81
|
+
"name": "ux-heuristic-audit",
|
|
82
|
+
"description": "10 Nielsen heuristics parallel audit → severity ranking → fix brief",
|
|
83
|
+
"whenToUse": "When auditing a UI for usability issues using Nielsen's 10 heuristics",
|
|
84
|
+
"tier": "research",
|
|
85
|
+
"command": "/mindforge:wf-ux-heuristic-audit",
|
|
86
|
+
"scriptPath": ".mindforge/dynamic-workflows/scripts/ux-heuristic-audit.js",
|
|
87
|
+
"phases": [
|
|
88
|
+
{
|
|
89
|
+
"title": "Scope",
|
|
90
|
+
"detail": "Define target UI and identify key user flows to audit"
|
|
91
|
+
},
|
|
92
|
+
{
|
|
93
|
+
"title": "Audit",
|
|
94
|
+
"detail": "10 parallel heuristic evaluators — one per Nielsen heuristic"
|
|
95
|
+
},
|
|
96
|
+
{
|
|
97
|
+
"title": "Rank",
|
|
98
|
+
"detail": "Severity ranking of all violations by impact on user experience"
|
|
99
|
+
},
|
|
100
|
+
{
|
|
101
|
+
"title": "Brief",
|
|
102
|
+
"detail": "Prioritized fix brief with specific design recommendations"
|
|
103
|
+
}
|
|
104
|
+
]
|
|
105
|
+
},
|
|
106
|
+
{
|
|
107
|
+
"name": "competitive-teardown",
|
|
108
|
+
"description": "5 parallel competitor angle agents → pipeline synthesis into competitive positioning report",
|
|
109
|
+
"whenToUse": "When doing a deep competitive teardown across product, tech, pricing, hiring, and community",
|
|
110
|
+
"tier": "research",
|
|
111
|
+
"command": "/mindforge:wf-competitive-teardown",
|
|
112
|
+
"scriptPath": ".mindforge/dynamic-workflows/scripts/competitive-teardown.js",
|
|
113
|
+
"phases": [
|
|
114
|
+
{
|
|
115
|
+
"title": "Scope",
|
|
116
|
+
"detail": "Identify competitors and define evaluation framework"
|
|
117
|
+
},
|
|
118
|
+
{
|
|
119
|
+
"title": "Research",
|
|
120
|
+
"detail": "5 parallel competitor angle agents: product/tech/pricing/hiring/community"
|
|
121
|
+
},
|
|
122
|
+
{
|
|
123
|
+
"title": "Analyze",
|
|
124
|
+
"detail": "Synthesize competitive landscape from all angles"
|
|
125
|
+
},
|
|
126
|
+
{
|
|
127
|
+
"title": "Synthesis",
|
|
128
|
+
"detail": "Competitive positioning report with differentiation opportunities"
|
|
129
|
+
}
|
|
43
130
|
]
|
|
44
131
|
},
|
|
45
132
|
{
|
|
@@ -50,10 +137,22 @@
|
|
|
50
137
|
"command": "/mindforge:wf-code-audit",
|
|
51
138
|
"scriptPath": ".mindforge/dynamic-workflows/scripts/code-audit.js",
|
|
52
139
|
"phases": [
|
|
53
|
-
{
|
|
54
|
-
|
|
55
|
-
|
|
56
|
-
|
|
140
|
+
{
|
|
141
|
+
"title": "Scope",
|
|
142
|
+
"detail": "Build file list from git diff or path argument"
|
|
143
|
+
},
|
|
144
|
+
{
|
|
145
|
+
"title": "Audit",
|
|
146
|
+
"detail": "3 parallel auditors: security / quality / performance"
|
|
147
|
+
},
|
|
148
|
+
{
|
|
149
|
+
"title": "Verify",
|
|
150
|
+
"detail": "Adversarial verification of high-severity findings"
|
|
151
|
+
},
|
|
152
|
+
{
|
|
153
|
+
"title": "Report",
|
|
154
|
+
"detail": "Risk-ranked report with actionable remediation"
|
|
155
|
+
}
|
|
57
156
|
]
|
|
58
157
|
},
|
|
59
158
|
{
|
|
@@ -64,10 +163,22 @@
|
|
|
64
163
|
"command": "/mindforge:wf-feature-planner",
|
|
65
164
|
"scriptPath": ".mindforge/dynamic-workflows/scripts/feature-planner.js",
|
|
66
165
|
"phases": [
|
|
67
|
-
{
|
|
68
|
-
|
|
69
|
-
|
|
70
|
-
|
|
166
|
+
{
|
|
167
|
+
"title": "Brief",
|
|
168
|
+
"detail": "Clarify goals, users, success criteria"
|
|
169
|
+
},
|
|
170
|
+
{
|
|
171
|
+
"title": "PRD",
|
|
172
|
+
"detail": "Generate product requirements document"
|
|
173
|
+
},
|
|
174
|
+
{
|
|
175
|
+
"title": "Architecture",
|
|
176
|
+
"detail": "Design technical architecture and data flow"
|
|
177
|
+
},
|
|
178
|
+
{
|
|
179
|
+
"title": "Stories",
|
|
180
|
+
"detail": "Break into implementation user stories"
|
|
181
|
+
}
|
|
71
182
|
]
|
|
72
183
|
},
|
|
73
184
|
{
|
|
@@ -78,10 +189,22 @@
|
|
|
78
189
|
"command": "/mindforge:wf-pr-review",
|
|
79
190
|
"scriptPath": ".mindforge/dynamic-workflows/scripts/pr-review.js",
|
|
80
191
|
"phases": [
|
|
81
|
-
{
|
|
82
|
-
|
|
83
|
-
|
|
84
|
-
|
|
192
|
+
{
|
|
193
|
+
"title": "Scope",
|
|
194
|
+
"detail": "Read diff and build review context"
|
|
195
|
+
},
|
|
196
|
+
{
|
|
197
|
+
"title": "Review",
|
|
198
|
+
"detail": "4 parallel reviewers: correctness / security / performance / style"
|
|
199
|
+
},
|
|
200
|
+
{
|
|
201
|
+
"title": "Consensus",
|
|
202
|
+
"detail": "Merge findings, deduplicate, score severity"
|
|
203
|
+
},
|
|
204
|
+
{
|
|
205
|
+
"title": "Verdict",
|
|
206
|
+
"detail": "Produce APPROVED / CHANGES REQUIRED verdict with findings"
|
|
207
|
+
}
|
|
85
208
|
]
|
|
86
209
|
},
|
|
87
210
|
{
|
|
@@ -92,10 +215,22 @@
|
|
|
92
215
|
"command": "/mindforge:wf-tdd-sprint",
|
|
93
216
|
"scriptPath": ".mindforge/dynamic-workflows/scripts/tdd-sprint.js",
|
|
94
217
|
"phases": [
|
|
95
|
-
{
|
|
96
|
-
|
|
97
|
-
|
|
98
|
-
|
|
218
|
+
{
|
|
219
|
+
"title": "Spec",
|
|
220
|
+
"detail": "Define behavior requirements and acceptance criteria"
|
|
221
|
+
},
|
|
222
|
+
{
|
|
223
|
+
"title": "Red",
|
|
224
|
+
"detail": "Write failing test that captures the requirement"
|
|
225
|
+
},
|
|
226
|
+
{
|
|
227
|
+
"title": "Green",
|
|
228
|
+
"detail": "Write minimal code to make the test pass"
|
|
229
|
+
},
|
|
230
|
+
{
|
|
231
|
+
"title": "Refactor",
|
|
232
|
+
"detail": "Clean up while keeping tests green, verify all pass"
|
|
233
|
+
}
|
|
99
234
|
]
|
|
100
235
|
},
|
|
101
236
|
{
|
|
@@ -106,10 +241,204 @@
|
|
|
106
241
|
"command": "/mindforge:wf-refactor-plan",
|
|
107
242
|
"scriptPath": ".mindforge/dynamic-workflows/scripts/refactor-plan.js",
|
|
108
243
|
"phases": [
|
|
109
|
-
{
|
|
110
|
-
|
|
111
|
-
|
|
112
|
-
|
|
244
|
+
{
|
|
245
|
+
"title": "Scan",
|
|
246
|
+
"detail": "Identify technical debt, complexity hotspots, dead code"
|
|
247
|
+
},
|
|
248
|
+
{
|
|
249
|
+
"title": "Prioritize",
|
|
250
|
+
"detail": "Risk-sort by blast radius and test coverage"
|
|
251
|
+
},
|
|
252
|
+
{
|
|
253
|
+
"title": "Sequence",
|
|
254
|
+
"detail": "Order changes to minimize merge conflicts"
|
|
255
|
+
},
|
|
256
|
+
{
|
|
257
|
+
"title": "Plan",
|
|
258
|
+
"detail": "Produce step-by-step refactor plan with verification gates"
|
|
259
|
+
}
|
|
260
|
+
]
|
|
261
|
+
},
|
|
262
|
+
{
|
|
263
|
+
"name": "test-coverage-gap",
|
|
264
|
+
"description": "Parallel per-module coverage analysis → gap map → prioritized test-writing plan",
|
|
265
|
+
"whenToUse": "When you need to find and fix test coverage gaps across a codebase or module",
|
|
266
|
+
"tier": "dev",
|
|
267
|
+
"command": "/mindforge:wf-test-coverage-gap",
|
|
268
|
+
"scriptPath": ".mindforge/dynamic-workflows/scripts/test-coverage-gap.js",
|
|
269
|
+
"phases": [
|
|
270
|
+
{
|
|
271
|
+
"title": "Discover",
|
|
272
|
+
"detail": "Map modules and identify testable units"
|
|
273
|
+
},
|
|
274
|
+
{
|
|
275
|
+
"title": "Analyze",
|
|
276
|
+
"detail": "Parallel coverage analysis per module"
|
|
277
|
+
},
|
|
278
|
+
{
|
|
279
|
+
"title": "GapMap",
|
|
280
|
+
"detail": "Synthesize gaps by severity and risk"
|
|
281
|
+
},
|
|
282
|
+
{
|
|
283
|
+
"title": "Plan",
|
|
284
|
+
"detail": "Prioritized test-writing plan with concrete test cases"
|
|
285
|
+
}
|
|
286
|
+
]
|
|
287
|
+
},
|
|
288
|
+
{
|
|
289
|
+
"name": "api-contract-test",
|
|
290
|
+
"description": "Writer/Reviewer pattern: spec reader vs implementation reader → contract violation report",
|
|
291
|
+
"whenToUse": "When validating that an API implementation matches its OpenAPI/GraphQL/Protobuf spec",
|
|
292
|
+
"tier": "dev",
|
|
293
|
+
"command": "/mindforge:wf-api-contract-test",
|
|
294
|
+
"scriptPath": ".mindforge/dynamic-workflows/scripts/api-contract-test.js",
|
|
295
|
+
"phases": [
|
|
296
|
+
{
|
|
297
|
+
"title": "ReadSpec",
|
|
298
|
+
"detail": "Parse the API specification (OpenAPI/GraphQL/Protobuf/docs)"
|
|
299
|
+
},
|
|
300
|
+
{
|
|
301
|
+
"title": "ReadImpl",
|
|
302
|
+
"detail": "Read the actual implementation in a fresh context"
|
|
303
|
+
},
|
|
304
|
+
{
|
|
305
|
+
"title": "Diff",
|
|
306
|
+
"detail": "Cross-reference spec contracts vs implementation"
|
|
307
|
+
},
|
|
308
|
+
{
|
|
309
|
+
"title": "Report",
|
|
310
|
+
"detail": "Violation report with severity and fix instructions"
|
|
311
|
+
}
|
|
312
|
+
]
|
|
313
|
+
},
|
|
314
|
+
{
|
|
315
|
+
"name": "debug-detective",
|
|
316
|
+
"description": "4-hypothesis parallel investigation → evidence gathering → scientific RCA",
|
|
317
|
+
"whenToUse": "When debugging a hard-to-reproduce bug or production issue with unclear root cause",
|
|
318
|
+
"tier": "dev",
|
|
319
|
+
"command": "/mindforge:wf-debug-detective",
|
|
320
|
+
"scriptPath": ".mindforge/dynamic-workflows/scripts/debug-detective.js",
|
|
321
|
+
"phases": [
|
|
322
|
+
{
|
|
323
|
+
"title": "Intake",
|
|
324
|
+
"detail": "Document symptoms, context, and reproduction steps"
|
|
325
|
+
},
|
|
326
|
+
{
|
|
327
|
+
"title": "Hypothesize",
|
|
328
|
+
"detail": "4 parallel hypothesis agents from different angles"
|
|
329
|
+
},
|
|
330
|
+
{
|
|
331
|
+
"title": "Evidence",
|
|
332
|
+
"detail": "Parallel evidence gathering per hypothesis"
|
|
333
|
+
},
|
|
334
|
+
{
|
|
335
|
+
"title": "RCA",
|
|
336
|
+
"detail": "Scientific root cause analysis from evidence"
|
|
337
|
+
},
|
|
338
|
+
{
|
|
339
|
+
"title": "Fix",
|
|
340
|
+
"detail": "Targeted fix plan with regression test spec"
|
|
341
|
+
}
|
|
342
|
+
]
|
|
343
|
+
},
|
|
344
|
+
{
|
|
345
|
+
"name": "writer-reviewer",
|
|
346
|
+
"description": "Anthropic Writer/Reviewer pattern: implement in Context A → fresh Context B reviews the diff",
|
|
347
|
+
"whenToUse": "When you want unbiased code review — a fresh context reviewer has no bias toward code it did not write",
|
|
348
|
+
"tier": "dev",
|
|
349
|
+
"command": "/mindforge:wf-writer-reviewer",
|
|
350
|
+
"scriptPath": ".mindforge/dynamic-workflows/scripts/writer-reviewer.js",
|
|
351
|
+
"phases": [
|
|
352
|
+
{
|
|
353
|
+
"title": "Implement",
|
|
354
|
+
"detail": "Writer agent implements the requested change"
|
|
355
|
+
},
|
|
356
|
+
{
|
|
357
|
+
"title": "Review",
|
|
358
|
+
"detail": "Fresh reviewer agent inspects only the diff without implementation context"
|
|
359
|
+
},
|
|
360
|
+
{
|
|
361
|
+
"title": "Verdict",
|
|
362
|
+
"detail": "Accept / request-changes verdict with specific actionable feedback"
|
|
363
|
+
}
|
|
364
|
+
]
|
|
365
|
+
},
|
|
366
|
+
{
|
|
367
|
+
"name": "mutation-testing",
|
|
368
|
+
"description": "Mutant generator → parallel kill-test agents → mutation score + survival report",
|
|
369
|
+
"whenToUse": "When evaluating test suite effectiveness by checking if tests catch deliberate code mutations",
|
|
370
|
+
"tier": "dev",
|
|
371
|
+
"command": "/mindforge:wf-mutation-testing",
|
|
372
|
+
"scriptPath": ".mindforge/dynamic-workflows/scripts/mutation-testing.js",
|
|
373
|
+
"phases": [
|
|
374
|
+
{
|
|
375
|
+
"title": "Analyze",
|
|
376
|
+
"detail": "Identify mutable source lines: conditions, operators, return values"
|
|
377
|
+
},
|
|
378
|
+
{
|
|
379
|
+
"title": "Mutate",
|
|
380
|
+
"detail": "Generate 10-15 specific mutation descriptions"
|
|
381
|
+
},
|
|
382
|
+
{
|
|
383
|
+
"title": "Kill",
|
|
384
|
+
"detail": "Parallel kill-test per mutation — would existing tests catch it?"
|
|
385
|
+
},
|
|
386
|
+
{
|
|
387
|
+
"title": "Report",
|
|
388
|
+
"detail": "Mutation score report with killed/survived/timeout breakdown"
|
|
389
|
+
}
|
|
390
|
+
]
|
|
391
|
+
},
|
|
392
|
+
{
|
|
393
|
+
"name": "code-explainer",
|
|
394
|
+
"description": "Structural map → domain extraction → architecture patterns → guided narrative tour for onboarding",
|
|
395
|
+
"whenToUse": "When onboarding to an unfamiliar codebase or explaining a complex module to a new developer",
|
|
396
|
+
"tier": "dev",
|
|
397
|
+
"command": "/mindforge:wf-code-explainer",
|
|
398
|
+
"scriptPath": ".mindforge/dynamic-workflows/scripts/code-explainer.js",
|
|
399
|
+
"phases": [
|
|
400
|
+
{
|
|
401
|
+
"title": "Structure",
|
|
402
|
+
"detail": "Map file structure, entry points, and module boundaries"
|
|
403
|
+
},
|
|
404
|
+
{
|
|
405
|
+
"title": "Domain",
|
|
406
|
+
"detail": "Extract domain concepts, business logic, and key abstractions"
|
|
407
|
+
},
|
|
408
|
+
{
|
|
409
|
+
"title": "Architecture",
|
|
410
|
+
"detail": "Identify architectural patterns, data flow, and design decisions"
|
|
411
|
+
},
|
|
412
|
+
{
|
|
413
|
+
"title": "Tour",
|
|
414
|
+
"detail": "Synthesize a guided narrative tour for a new developer"
|
|
415
|
+
}
|
|
416
|
+
]
|
|
417
|
+
},
|
|
418
|
+
{
|
|
419
|
+
"name": "design-system-audit",
|
|
420
|
+
"description": "5 parallel dimension auditors (spacing/color/typography/icons/a11y) → consistency score",
|
|
421
|
+
"whenToUse": "When auditing a frontend codebase for design system consistency and token usage",
|
|
422
|
+
"tier": "dev",
|
|
423
|
+
"command": "/mindforge:wf-design-system-audit",
|
|
424
|
+
"scriptPath": ".mindforge/dynamic-workflows/scripts/design-system-audit.js",
|
|
425
|
+
"phases": [
|
|
426
|
+
{
|
|
427
|
+
"title": "Inventory",
|
|
428
|
+
"detail": "Discover design tokens, component files, and styling approach"
|
|
429
|
+
},
|
|
430
|
+
{
|
|
431
|
+
"title": "Audit",
|
|
432
|
+
"detail": "5 parallel dimension auditors: spacing, color, typography, icons, accessibility"
|
|
433
|
+
},
|
|
434
|
+
{
|
|
435
|
+
"title": "Score",
|
|
436
|
+
"detail": "Aggregate consistency scores per dimension and overall"
|
|
437
|
+
},
|
|
438
|
+
{
|
|
439
|
+
"title": "Report",
|
|
440
|
+
"detail": "Design system health report with specific violation fixes"
|
|
441
|
+
}
|
|
113
442
|
]
|
|
114
443
|
},
|
|
115
444
|
{
|
|
@@ -120,10 +449,22 @@
|
|
|
120
449
|
"command": "/mindforge:wf-incident-response",
|
|
121
450
|
"scriptPath": ".mindforge/dynamic-workflows/scripts/incident-response.js",
|
|
122
451
|
"phases": [
|
|
123
|
-
{
|
|
124
|
-
|
|
125
|
-
|
|
126
|
-
|
|
452
|
+
{
|
|
453
|
+
"title": "Alert",
|
|
454
|
+
"detail": "Characterize the incident: impact, scope, timeline"
|
|
455
|
+
},
|
|
456
|
+
{
|
|
457
|
+
"title": "Investigate",
|
|
458
|
+
"detail": "4 parallel agents: logs / metrics / traces / code changes"
|
|
459
|
+
},
|
|
460
|
+
{
|
|
461
|
+
"title": "Mitigate",
|
|
462
|
+
"detail": "Identify and apply immediate mitigation steps"
|
|
463
|
+
},
|
|
464
|
+
{
|
|
465
|
+
"title": "RCA",
|
|
466
|
+
"detail": "Root cause analysis and postmortem document"
|
|
467
|
+
}
|
|
127
468
|
]
|
|
128
469
|
},
|
|
129
470
|
{
|
|
@@ -134,10 +475,126 @@
|
|
|
134
475
|
"command": "/mindforge:wf-release-prep",
|
|
135
476
|
"scriptPath": ".mindforge/dynamic-workflows/scripts/release-prep.js",
|
|
136
477
|
"phases": [
|
|
137
|
-
{
|
|
138
|
-
|
|
139
|
-
|
|
140
|
-
|
|
478
|
+
{
|
|
479
|
+
"title": "Check",
|
|
480
|
+
"detail": "Run tests, verify no uncommitted changes, check CI status"
|
|
481
|
+
},
|
|
482
|
+
{
|
|
483
|
+
"title": "Changelog",
|
|
484
|
+
"detail": "Generate changelog from commits since last release"
|
|
485
|
+
},
|
|
486
|
+
{
|
|
487
|
+
"title": "Bump",
|
|
488
|
+
"detail": "Update version in all required files"
|
|
489
|
+
},
|
|
490
|
+
{
|
|
491
|
+
"title": "PR",
|
|
492
|
+
"detail": "Create release PR and draft announcement"
|
|
493
|
+
}
|
|
494
|
+
]
|
|
495
|
+
},
|
|
496
|
+
{
|
|
497
|
+
"name": "dependency-health",
|
|
498
|
+
"description": "Parallel per-dependency audit (CVEs / licenses / staleness / maintenance) → risk matrix",
|
|
499
|
+
"whenToUse": "When auditing dependencies before a release, security review, or due diligence",
|
|
500
|
+
"tier": "ops",
|
|
501
|
+
"command": "/mindforge:wf-dependency-health",
|
|
502
|
+
"scriptPath": ".mindforge/dynamic-workflows/scripts/dependency-health.js",
|
|
503
|
+
"phases": [
|
|
504
|
+
{
|
|
505
|
+
"title": "Inventory",
|
|
506
|
+
"detail": "Extract full dependency tree from package manifests"
|
|
507
|
+
},
|
|
508
|
+
{
|
|
509
|
+
"title": "Audit",
|
|
510
|
+
"detail": "Parallel audit per batch: CVEs, license risk, staleness, maintenance status"
|
|
511
|
+
},
|
|
512
|
+
{
|
|
513
|
+
"title": "RiskMatrix",
|
|
514
|
+
"detail": "Consolidate into risk matrix with severity tiers"
|
|
515
|
+
},
|
|
516
|
+
{
|
|
517
|
+
"title": "Action",
|
|
518
|
+
"detail": "Prioritized upgrade / replace / accept recommendations"
|
|
519
|
+
}
|
|
520
|
+
]
|
|
521
|
+
},
|
|
522
|
+
{
|
|
523
|
+
"name": "database-migration",
|
|
524
|
+
"description": "Schema diff → risk analysis → migration scripts → rollback plan",
|
|
525
|
+
"whenToUse": "When planning or reviewing a database schema migration",
|
|
526
|
+
"tier": "ops",
|
|
527
|
+
"command": "/mindforge:wf-database-migration",
|
|
528
|
+
"scriptPath": ".mindforge/dynamic-workflows/scripts/database-migration.js",
|
|
529
|
+
"phases": [
|
|
530
|
+
{
|
|
531
|
+
"title": "SchemaDiff",
|
|
532
|
+
"detail": "Parse current and target schema, compute structural diff"
|
|
533
|
+
},
|
|
534
|
+
{
|
|
535
|
+
"title": "RiskAnalysis",
|
|
536
|
+
"detail": "Assess data loss risk, locking impact, and rollback complexity"
|
|
537
|
+
},
|
|
538
|
+
{
|
|
539
|
+
"title": "Scripts",
|
|
540
|
+
"detail": "Generate forward migration + rollback scripts"
|
|
541
|
+
},
|
|
542
|
+
{
|
|
543
|
+
"title": "Runbook",
|
|
544
|
+
"detail": "Step-by-step production runbook with verification checks"
|
|
545
|
+
}
|
|
546
|
+
]
|
|
547
|
+
},
|
|
548
|
+
{
|
|
549
|
+
"name": "multi-repo-sync",
|
|
550
|
+
"description": "Parallel per-repo audit → cross-repo divergence map → sync plan",
|
|
551
|
+
"whenToUse": "When managing multiple related repos and need to find/fix divergence in shared config, deps, or conventions",
|
|
552
|
+
"tier": "ops",
|
|
553
|
+
"command": "/mindforge:wf-multi-repo-sync",
|
|
554
|
+
"scriptPath": ".mindforge/dynamic-workflows/scripts/multi-repo-sync.js",
|
|
555
|
+
"phases": [
|
|
556
|
+
{
|
|
557
|
+
"title": "Discover",
|
|
558
|
+
"detail": "List target repos and their relationships"
|
|
559
|
+
},
|
|
560
|
+
{
|
|
561
|
+
"title": "Audit",
|
|
562
|
+
"detail": "Parallel audit per repo for divergence from the reference"
|
|
563
|
+
},
|
|
564
|
+
{
|
|
565
|
+
"title": "DivergenceMap",
|
|
566
|
+
"detail": "Cross-repo divergence map with severity"
|
|
567
|
+
},
|
|
568
|
+
{
|
|
569
|
+
"title": "SyncPlan",
|
|
570
|
+
"detail": "Prioritized sync plan — what to align and how"
|
|
571
|
+
}
|
|
572
|
+
]
|
|
573
|
+
},
|
|
574
|
+
{
|
|
575
|
+
"name": "cost-analysis",
|
|
576
|
+
"description": "Parallel infra/API/query/bundle cost agents → reduction plan with ROI estimates",
|
|
577
|
+
"whenToUse": "When analyzing and reducing infrastructure, API, database, or bundle costs",
|
|
578
|
+
"tier": "ops",
|
|
579
|
+
"command": "/mindforge:wf-cost-analysis",
|
|
580
|
+
"scriptPath": ".mindforge/dynamic-workflows/scripts/cost-analysis.js",
|
|
581
|
+
"phases": [
|
|
582
|
+
{
|
|
583
|
+
"title": "Scope",
|
|
584
|
+
"detail": "Identify cost centers and establish current baseline"
|
|
585
|
+
},
|
|
586
|
+
{
|
|
587
|
+
"title": "Analyze",
|
|
588
|
+
"detail": "4 parallel cost dimension agents: infra / API / database / bundle"
|
|
589
|
+
},
|
|
590
|
+
{
|
|
591
|
+
"title": "Model",
|
|
592
|
+
"detail": "Cost model with reduction opportunities and ROI estimates"
|
|
593
|
+
},
|
|
594
|
+
{
|
|
595
|
+
"title": "Plan",
|
|
596
|
+
"detail": "Prioritized cost reduction plan with implementation steps"
|
|
597
|
+
}
|
|
141
598
|
]
|
|
142
599
|
},
|
|
143
600
|
{
|
|
@@ -148,10 +605,22 @@
|
|
|
148
605
|
"command": "/mindforge:wf-onboard-codebase",
|
|
149
606
|
"scriptPath": ".mindforge/dynamic-workflows/scripts/onboard-codebase.js",
|
|
150
607
|
"phases": [
|
|
151
|
-
{
|
|
152
|
-
|
|
153
|
-
|
|
154
|
-
|
|
608
|
+
{
|
|
609
|
+
"title": "Map",
|
|
610
|
+
"detail": "Discover file structure, languages, entry points"
|
|
611
|
+
},
|
|
612
|
+
{
|
|
613
|
+
"title": "Domain",
|
|
614
|
+
"detail": "Identify business domains and core abstractions"
|
|
615
|
+
},
|
|
616
|
+
{
|
|
617
|
+
"title": "Architecture",
|
|
618
|
+
"detail": "Map layers, data flow, and key patterns"
|
|
619
|
+
},
|
|
620
|
+
{
|
|
621
|
+
"title": "Tour",
|
|
622
|
+
"detail": "Generate guided tour and onboarding documentation"
|
|
623
|
+
}
|
|
155
624
|
]
|
|
156
625
|
},
|
|
157
626
|
{
|
|
@@ -162,10 +631,212 @@
|
|
|
162
631
|
"command": "/mindforge:wf-perf-optimize",
|
|
163
632
|
"scriptPath": ".mindforge/dynamic-workflows/scripts/perf-optimize.js",
|
|
164
633
|
"phases": [
|
|
165
|
-
{
|
|
166
|
-
|
|
167
|
-
|
|
168
|
-
|
|
634
|
+
{
|
|
635
|
+
"title": "Profile",
|
|
636
|
+
"detail": "Establish baseline metrics and identify slow paths"
|
|
637
|
+
},
|
|
638
|
+
{
|
|
639
|
+
"title": "Identify",
|
|
640
|
+
"detail": "4 parallel agents: DB queries / network / CPU / memory"
|
|
641
|
+
},
|
|
642
|
+
{
|
|
643
|
+
"title": "Plan",
|
|
644
|
+
"detail": "Prioritize fixes by impact-to-effort ratio"
|
|
645
|
+
},
|
|
646
|
+
{
|
|
647
|
+
"title": "Benchmark",
|
|
648
|
+
"detail": "Define verification benchmarks for each fix"
|
|
649
|
+
}
|
|
650
|
+
]
|
|
651
|
+
},
|
|
652
|
+
{
|
|
653
|
+
"name": "architecture-modernization",
|
|
654
|
+
"description": "Legacy architecture map → target design → migration sequencing → risk gates",
|
|
655
|
+
"whenToUse": "When planning a major architecture overhaul: monolith-to-services, framework upgrade, or platform migration",
|
|
656
|
+
"tier": "intelligence",
|
|
657
|
+
"command": "/mindforge:wf-architecture-modernization",
|
|
658
|
+
"scriptPath": ".mindforge/dynamic-workflows/scripts/architecture-modernization.js",
|
|
659
|
+
"phases": [
|
|
660
|
+
{
|
|
661
|
+
"title": "Map",
|
|
662
|
+
"detail": "Map current architecture: components, dependencies, coupling, pain points"
|
|
663
|
+
},
|
|
664
|
+
{
|
|
665
|
+
"title": "Design",
|
|
666
|
+
"detail": "3 parallel target architecture proposals with trade-off analysis"
|
|
667
|
+
},
|
|
668
|
+
{
|
|
669
|
+
"title": "Select",
|
|
670
|
+
"detail": "Judge panel selects best design, synthesizes hybrid"
|
|
671
|
+
},
|
|
672
|
+
{
|
|
673
|
+
"title": "Sequence",
|
|
674
|
+
"detail": "Migration sequencing with risk gates and rollback checkpoints"
|
|
675
|
+
},
|
|
676
|
+
{
|
|
677
|
+
"title": "Roadmap",
|
|
678
|
+
"detail": "Sprint-by-sprint modernization roadmap"
|
|
679
|
+
}
|
|
680
|
+
]
|
|
681
|
+
},
|
|
682
|
+
{
|
|
683
|
+
"name": "documentation-gen",
|
|
684
|
+
"description": "Parallel per-file doc generation → style normalization → publish-ready documentation",
|
|
685
|
+
"whenToUse": "When generating or refreshing documentation for a codebase, API, or module",
|
|
686
|
+
"tier": "intelligence",
|
|
687
|
+
"command": "/mindforge:wf-documentation-gen",
|
|
688
|
+
"scriptPath": ".mindforge/dynamic-workflows/scripts/documentation-gen.js",
|
|
689
|
+
"phases": [
|
|
690
|
+
{
|
|
691
|
+
"title": "Scope",
|
|
692
|
+
"detail": "Discover files needing documentation"
|
|
693
|
+
},
|
|
694
|
+
{
|
|
695
|
+
"title": "Generate",
|
|
696
|
+
"detail": "Parallel doc generation per file/module"
|
|
697
|
+
},
|
|
698
|
+
{
|
|
699
|
+
"title": "Normalize",
|
|
700
|
+
"detail": "Style consistency pass across all generated docs"
|
|
701
|
+
},
|
|
702
|
+
{
|
|
703
|
+
"title": "Publish",
|
|
704
|
+
"detail": "Assemble README, API reference, and changelog entries"
|
|
705
|
+
}
|
|
706
|
+
]
|
|
707
|
+
},
|
|
708
|
+
{
|
|
709
|
+
"name": "api-migration",
|
|
710
|
+
"description": "Breaking change detection → versioning strategy → migration guide → compatibility matrix",
|
|
711
|
+
"whenToUse": "When planning or communicating an API version migration to consumers",
|
|
712
|
+
"tier": "intelligence",
|
|
713
|
+
"command": "/mindforge:wf-api-migration",
|
|
714
|
+
"scriptPath": ".mindforge/dynamic-workflows/scripts/api-migration.js",
|
|
715
|
+
"phases": [
|
|
716
|
+
{
|
|
717
|
+
"title": "Detect",
|
|
718
|
+
"detail": "Detect breaking vs non-breaking changes between old and new API versions"
|
|
719
|
+
},
|
|
720
|
+
{
|
|
721
|
+
"title": "Version",
|
|
722
|
+
"detail": "Propose versioning strategy: semver, URL versioning, or header versioning"
|
|
723
|
+
},
|
|
724
|
+
{
|
|
725
|
+
"title": "Guide",
|
|
726
|
+
"detail": "Generate migration guide for API consumers"
|
|
727
|
+
},
|
|
728
|
+
{
|
|
729
|
+
"title": "Matrix",
|
|
730
|
+
"detail": "Compatibility matrix: which client versions work with which API versions"
|
|
731
|
+
}
|
|
732
|
+
]
|
|
733
|
+
},
|
|
734
|
+
{
|
|
735
|
+
"name": "data-pipeline-validate",
|
|
736
|
+
"description": "Pipeline stage-by-stage validation → data quality gates → anomaly detection report",
|
|
737
|
+
"whenToUse": "When validating a data pipeline for correctness, completeness, and quality before production use",
|
|
738
|
+
"tier": "intelligence",
|
|
739
|
+
"command": "/mindforge:wf-data-pipeline-validate",
|
|
740
|
+
"scriptPath": ".mindforge/dynamic-workflows/scripts/data-pipeline-validate.js",
|
|
741
|
+
"phases": [
|
|
742
|
+
{
|
|
743
|
+
"title": "Map",
|
|
744
|
+
"detail": "Map all pipeline stages from source to sink"
|
|
745
|
+
},
|
|
746
|
+
{
|
|
747
|
+
"title": "Validate",
|
|
748
|
+
"detail": "Parallel validation per stage (schema / completeness / transforms / outputs)"
|
|
749
|
+
},
|
|
750
|
+
{
|
|
751
|
+
"title": "Quality",
|
|
752
|
+
"detail": "Data quality gate assessment — freshness, completeness, consistency"
|
|
753
|
+
},
|
|
754
|
+
{
|
|
755
|
+
"title": "Report",
|
|
756
|
+
"detail": "Validation report with stage health scores and fix recommendations"
|
|
757
|
+
}
|
|
758
|
+
]
|
|
759
|
+
},
|
|
760
|
+
{
|
|
761
|
+
"name": "security-hardening",
|
|
762
|
+
"description": "5-angle OWASP parallel scout → 3-vote adversarial verification → threat model + remediation roadmap",
|
|
763
|
+
"whenToUse": "When hardening a codebase before a security review, pentest, or production launch",
|
|
764
|
+
"tier": "beast",
|
|
765
|
+
"command": "/mindforge:wf-security-hardening",
|
|
766
|
+
"scriptPath": ".mindforge/dynamic-workflows/scripts/security-hardening.js",
|
|
767
|
+
"phases": [
|
|
768
|
+
{
|
|
769
|
+
"title": "Scope",
|
|
770
|
+
"detail": "Define attack surface and target context"
|
|
771
|
+
},
|
|
772
|
+
{
|
|
773
|
+
"title": "Scout",
|
|
774
|
+
"detail": "5 parallel OWASP/CWE dimension scouts"
|
|
775
|
+
},
|
|
776
|
+
{
|
|
777
|
+
"title": "Verify",
|
|
778
|
+
"detail": "3-vote adversarial verification per critical finding"
|
|
779
|
+
},
|
|
780
|
+
{
|
|
781
|
+
"title": "ThreatModel",
|
|
782
|
+
"detail": "STRIDE threat model from confirmed findings"
|
|
783
|
+
},
|
|
784
|
+
{
|
|
785
|
+
"title": "Roadmap",
|
|
786
|
+
"detail": "Prioritized remediation roadmap with severity/effort matrix"
|
|
787
|
+
}
|
|
788
|
+
]
|
|
789
|
+
},
|
|
790
|
+
{
|
|
791
|
+
"name": "accessibility-audit",
|
|
792
|
+
"description": "WCAG 2.2 parallel per-criterion audit → 3-vote adversarial verify failures → remediation spec",
|
|
793
|
+
"whenToUse": "When auditing a UI for WCAG 2.2 compliance before launch, legal review, or accessibility certification",
|
|
794
|
+
"tier": "beast",
|
|
795
|
+
"command": "/mindforge:wf-accessibility-audit",
|
|
796
|
+
"scriptPath": ".mindforge/dynamic-workflows/scripts/accessibility-audit.js",
|
|
797
|
+
"phases": [
|
|
798
|
+
{
|
|
799
|
+
"title": "Scope",
|
|
800
|
+
"detail": "Define target UI and map components/pages to audit"
|
|
801
|
+
},
|
|
802
|
+
{
|
|
803
|
+
"title": "Audit",
|
|
804
|
+
"detail": "6 parallel WCAG principle auditors (Perceivable/Operable/Understandable/Robust + ARIA + Keyboard)"
|
|
805
|
+
},
|
|
806
|
+
{
|
|
807
|
+
"title": "Verify",
|
|
808
|
+
"detail": "3-vote adversarial verification of all Level A and AA failures"
|
|
809
|
+
},
|
|
810
|
+
{
|
|
811
|
+
"title": "Spec",
|
|
812
|
+
"detail": "Remediation spec with exact ARIA attributes, HTML fixes, and WCAG references"
|
|
813
|
+
}
|
|
814
|
+
]
|
|
815
|
+
},
|
|
816
|
+
{
|
|
817
|
+
"name": "security-threat-model",
|
|
818
|
+
"description": "Asset inventory → STRIDE threat enumeration → parallel mitigations → CVSS-style score matrix",
|
|
819
|
+
"whenToUse": "When threat modeling a system architecture, API, or new feature before building",
|
|
820
|
+
"tier": "beast",
|
|
821
|
+
"command": "/mindforge:wf-security-threat-model",
|
|
822
|
+
"scriptPath": ".mindforge/dynamic-workflows/scripts/security-threat-model.js",
|
|
823
|
+
"phases": [
|
|
824
|
+
{
|
|
825
|
+
"title": "Assets",
|
|
826
|
+
"detail": "Inventory system assets, data flows, and trust boundaries"
|
|
827
|
+
},
|
|
828
|
+
{
|
|
829
|
+
"title": "STRIDE",
|
|
830
|
+
"detail": "6 parallel STRIDE threat agents — one per threat category"
|
|
831
|
+
},
|
|
832
|
+
{
|
|
833
|
+
"title": "Mitigate",
|
|
834
|
+
"detail": "Parallel mitigation agent per identified threat"
|
|
835
|
+
},
|
|
836
|
+
{
|
|
837
|
+
"title": "Score",
|
|
838
|
+
"detail": "CVSS-style risk score matrix with remediation priority"
|
|
839
|
+
}
|
|
169
840
|
]
|
|
170
841
|
}
|
|
171
842
|
]
|