metacoding 1.4.3 → 1.5.0

This diff represents the content of publicly available package versions that have been released to one of the supported registries. The information contained in this diff is provided for informational purposes only and reflects changes between package versions as they appear in their respective public registries.
@@ -0,0 +1,193 @@
1
+ # {{PROJECT_NAME}} - Style Guide for Gemini Code Assist
2
+
3
+ This configuration provides development guidelines for Gemini Code Assist to ensure consistent coding practices and workflow adherence.
4
+
5
+ ## Project Configuration
6
+
7
+ **Project:** {{PROJECT_NAME}}
8
+ **Description:** {{PROJECT_DESCRIPTION}}
9
+ **Tech Stack:** {{TECH_STACK}}
10
+ **Environment:** {{ENVIRONMENT_TYPE}} development
11
+ **Domain:** {{PROJECT_DOMAIN}}
12
+
13
+ ## Development Workflow Configuration
14
+
15
+ **IMPORTANT: Follow this mandatory 7-step development workflow for ALL coding tasks.**
16
+
17
+ ### Workflow Step 1: Task Understanding and Planning
18
+
19
+ **Configuration Rule:** Always analyze before implementing.
20
+
21
+ - Read project system documentation and explore codebase structure completely
22
+ - Evaluate uncertainty level on scale from 1.0 (total uncertainty) to 0.1 (very low uncertainty)
23
+ - If uncertainty exceeds 0.1, continue research and exploration before requesting clarification
24
+ - Present brief implementation outline with essential details
25
+ - Obtain explicit user confirmation before advancing to next step
26
+ - **Critical Configuration:** No implementation work until all required documentation is complete
27
+
28
+ ### Workflow Step 2: Task Management
29
+
30
+ **Configuration Rule:** Document tasks before execution.
31
+
32
+ - Record all tasks in `/_meta/project-task-list.md` BEFORE any implementation work begins
33
+ - Apply standardized naming pattern: `[AREA]-TASK-[NUMBER]`
34
+ - Use area prefixes: CORE, API, UI, DB, AUTH, UTIL, CONFIG, DOC, CLI, TMPL
35
+ - Set task status to "In Progress" with clear descriptions and effort estimates
36
+ - Decompose complex tasks into manageable subtasks with sequential numbering
37
+
38
+ ### Workflow Step 3: Test-Driven Development (TDD)
39
+
40
+ **Configuration Rule:** Test documentation precedes test implementation.
41
+
42
+ - Document test cases in `/test/test-documentation.md` BEFORE implementing any test code
43
+ - Define expected behavior including inputs, outputs, and edge case scenarios
44
+ - Create test implementations only after test cases are fully documented
45
+ - Confirm tests fail appropriately (red phase in TDD cycle)
46
+ - Write minimal code to achieve passing tests (green phase in TDD cycle)
47
+ - Clean up test artifacts and organize test data in `/test/fixtures/`
48
+
49
+ ### Workflow Step 4: Implementation and Verification
50
+
51
+ **Configuration Rule:** Implement with thorough verification.
52
+
53
+ - Develop production code to satisfy documented requirements
54
+ - Execute all test suites (newly created and existing) to verify functionality
55
+ - Confirm implementation meets user requirements and obtain user validation
56
+ - Refactor code while preserving test coverage (refactor phase in TDD cycle)
57
+ - Remove temporary files and clean up development session artifacts
58
+
59
+ ### Workflow Step 5: Documentation and Status Updates
60
+
61
+ **Configuration Rule:** Update documentation consistently.
62
+
63
+ - Update all relevant project documentation files
64
+ - Mark completed tasks in `/_meta/project-task-list.md`
65
+ - Update test execution status in `/test/test-documentation.md`
66
+ - Document user-facing changes in `CHANGELOG.md`
67
+ - Review and update inline code documentation
68
+
69
+ ### Workflow Step 6: Version Control
70
+
71
+ **Configuration Rule:** Commit changes systematically.
72
+
73
+ - Apply conventional commit message format (feat:, fix:, docs:, refactor:, test:)
74
+ - Include tests, documentation, and implementation code in atomic commits
75
+ - Compose descriptive commit messages explaining implementation details and rationale
76
+ - Ensure each commit represents complete, functional feature
77
+
78
+ ### Workflow Step 7: Workflow Completion Check
79
+
80
+ **Configuration Rule:** Verify completion before proceeding.
81
+
82
+ - Validate all workflow requirements are satisfied
83
+ - Confirm all tests pass and documentation reflects current state
84
+ - Verify code changes are committed with appropriate messages
85
+ - Complete entire workflow cycle before initiating new task planning
86
+
87
+ ## Style Guide Enforcement
88
+
89
+ ### Documentation-First Style Rule
90
+
91
+ **MANDATORY CONFIGURATION: Documentation precedes execution for ALL development work.**
92
+
93
+ **Style Enforcement:**
94
+
95
+ - Prohibit coding, testing, or implementation until corresponding documentation exists
96
+ - Require task documentation in `/_meta/project-task-list.md` before work initiation
97
+ - Require test documentation in `/test/test-documentation.md` before test code creation
98
+ - Require explicit user approval of plan, scope, and consequences before proceeding
99
+
100
+ **Approved Style Examples:**
101
+
102
+ - "I'll document this task in the task list, create test case documentation, then obtain your confirmation before implementing"
103
+ - "Let me first document these test cases in test-documentation.md, then proceed with test implementation"
104
+
105
+ **Style Violations:**
106
+
107
+ - "I'll implement this feature and update documentation afterward"
108
+ - "I'll create the tests now and document them later"
109
+
110
+ ### Single-Task Style Rule
111
+
112
+ **MANDATORY CONFIGURATION: One modification at a time - prohibit task mixing.**
113
+
114
+ **Style Enforcement:**
115
+
116
+ - Prohibit simultaneous work on multiple unrelated tasks or mixing unrelated modifications
117
+ - When additional requests emerge during active development:
118
+ - **Blocking requests:** Include as subtask if it prevents current progress
119
+ - **Non-blocking requests:** Record in task list as separate item, complete current workflow first
120
+ - Redirect users attempting task switching during active workflow
121
+
122
+ **Style Response Templates:**
123
+
124
+ - "I've recorded that request in the task list. Completing our current workflow first ensures quality."
125
+ - "That relates to current work, so I'll include it as a subtask to address immediately."
126
+ - "I recognize that as a separate concern. Let me record it in our task list and complete this workflow first."
127
+
128
+ ### Quality Gate Style Rules
129
+
130
+ **Style Enforcement:**
131
+
132
+ - No workflow shortcuts: Complete every step sequentially
133
+ - No parallel task execution: Focus on single task until completely finished
134
+ - No test avoidance: Test-Driven Development approach is required
135
+ - No incomplete documentation: All documentation must reflect current state
136
+ - No uncommitted modifications: Commit all work before advancing to new tasks
137
+
138
+ ## Project Style Configuration
139
+
140
+ ### Build and Development Commands
141
+
142
+ ```bash
143
+ # Build configuration
144
+ {{BUILD_COMMAND}}
145
+
146
+ # Test execution
147
+ {{TEST_COMMAND}}
148
+
149
+ # Code linting
150
+ {{LINT_COMMAND}}
151
+
152
+ # Type validation
153
+ {{TYPECHECK_COMMAND}}
154
+ ```
155
+
156
+ ### Code Style Standards
157
+
158
+ - {{CODE_STYLE_GUIDELINES}}
159
+ - Apply conventional commit format consistently (feat:, fix:, docs:, refactor:, test:)
160
+ - Use descriptive variable and function naming conventions
161
+ - Prefer early returns over deeply nested conditional structures
162
+ - Maintain focused, appropriately-sized function implementations
163
+ - Include comments explaining complex business logic implementation
164
+
165
+ ### Testing Style Standards
166
+
167
+ - Follow Test-Driven Development (TDD) methodology consistently
168
+ - Include edge cases and error condition coverage in test suites
169
+ - Use realistic test data and fixture configurations
170
+ - Apply appropriate mocking strategies for external dependencies in unit tests
171
+ - Maintain high test coverage for critical functionality paths
172
+
173
+ ### Repository Organization Style
174
+
175
+ ```
176
+ {{REPOSITORY_STRUCTURE}}
177
+ ```
178
+
179
+ ### Development Style Guidelines
180
+
181
+ - **File Organization Style:** Prohibit source code placement in project root directory
182
+ - **Temporary File Style:** Clean up debug files, temporary outputs, experimental code artifacts
183
+ - **Error Handling Style:** Implement comprehensive error handling with structured logging
184
+ - **Resource Management Style:** Ensure proper cleanup of resources and event listeners
185
+ - **Performance Style:** Consider performance implications and identify optimization opportunities
186
+ - **Security Style:** Follow secure coding practices, validate inputs, sanitize outputs
187
+
188
+ ## Configuration Validation
189
+
190
+ After style guide setup, validate configuration by requesting:
191
+ **"What is the development workflow for this project?"**
192
+
193
+ Expected response should demonstrate understanding of 7-step workflow, emphasize documentation-first style rule, and show comprehension of single-task focus enforcement style.