mdkg 0.4.2 → 0.5.1
This diff represents the content of publicly available package versions that have been released to one of the supported registries. The information contained in this diff is provided for informational purposes only and reflects changes between package versions as they appear in their respective public registries.
- package/CHANGELOG.md +88 -15
- package/CLI_COMMAND_MATRIX.md +74 -5
- package/README.md +30 -2
- package/dist/cli.js +132 -5
- package/dist/command-contract.json +778 -16
- package/dist/commands/archive.js +196 -42
- package/dist/commands/bundle.js +180 -44
- package/dist/commands/capability.js +1 -0
- package/dist/commands/checkpoint.js +6 -5
- package/dist/commands/event_support.js +16 -7
- package/dist/commands/fix.js +11 -8
- package/dist/commands/git.js +41 -10
- package/dist/commands/goal.js +23 -23
- package/dist/commands/graph.js +64 -10
- package/dist/commands/handoff.js +4 -2
- package/dist/commands/init.js +28 -23
- package/dist/commands/loop.js +1668 -0
- package/dist/commands/loop_descriptors.js +219 -0
- package/dist/commands/mcp.js +101 -11
- package/dist/commands/new.js +49 -3
- package/dist/commands/pack.js +14 -7
- package/dist/commands/search.js +10 -1
- package/dist/commands/skill.js +12 -9
- package/dist/commands/skill_mirror.js +39 -31
- package/dist/commands/subgraph.js +59 -26
- package/dist/commands/task.js +77 -4
- package/dist/commands/upgrade.js +13 -15
- package/dist/commands/validate.js +20 -7
- package/dist/commands/work.js +44 -26
- package/dist/commands/workspace.js +10 -4
- package/dist/core/config.js +45 -17
- package/dist/core/filesystem_authority.js +281 -0
- package/dist/core/project_db_events.js +4 -0
- package/dist/core/project_db_materializer.js +2 -0
- package/dist/core/project_db_migrations.js +238 -181
- package/dist/core/project_db_snapshot.js +64 -14
- package/dist/core/workspace_path.js +7 -0
- package/dist/graph/archive_integrity.js +1 -1
- package/dist/graph/capabilities_index_cache.js +4 -1
- package/dist/graph/frontmatter.js +38 -0
- package/dist/graph/goal_scope.js +4 -1
- package/dist/graph/index_cache.js +37 -7
- package/dist/graph/loop_bindings.js +39 -0
- package/dist/graph/node.js +209 -1
- package/dist/graph/node_body.js +52 -6
- package/dist/graph/skills_index_cache.js +41 -6
- package/dist/graph/skills_indexer.js +5 -2
- package/dist/graph/sqlite_index.js +118 -105
- package/dist/graph/subgraphs.js +142 -5
- package/dist/graph/validate_graph.js +109 -13
- package/dist/graph/workspace_files.js +39 -9
- package/dist/init/AGENT_START.md +16 -0
- package/dist/init/CLI_COMMAND_MATRIX.md +14 -0
- package/dist/init/config.json +7 -1
- package/dist/init/init-manifest.json +49 -4
- package/dist/init/skills/default/pursue-mdkg-loop/SKILL.md +150 -0
- package/dist/init/templates/default/loop.md +160 -0
- package/dist/init/templates/loops/backend-api-cli-bloat-audit.loop.md +117 -0
- package/dist/init/templates/loops/design-frontend-ux-audit.loop.md +117 -0
- package/dist/init/templates/loops/duplicate-code-and-linting-audit.loop.md +114 -0
- package/dist/init/templates/loops/security-audit.loop.md +140 -0
- package/dist/init/templates/loops/tech-stack-best-practices-audit.loop.md +116 -0
- package/dist/init/templates/loops/test-ci-skill-infrastructure-audit.loop.md +116 -0
- package/dist/init/templates/loops/user-story-audit-and-recommendations.loop.md +116 -0
- package/dist/pack/order.js +3 -1
- package/dist/pack/pack.js +139 -6
- package/dist/templates/loader.js +9 -3
- package/dist/util/lock.js +10 -9
- package/dist/util/zip.js +163 -9
- package/package.json +8 -4
|
@@ -0,0 +1,150 @@
|
|
|
1
|
+
---
|
|
2
|
+
name: pursue-mdkg-loop
|
|
3
|
+
description: Pursue a selected mdkg loop by exhausting authorized linked work lanes, recording blocker recovery, and closing only when the loop definition of done is satisfied or explicitly waived.
|
|
4
|
+
tags: [stage:execute, writer:orchestrator, mdkg, loop, recursive]
|
|
5
|
+
version: 0.2.0
|
|
6
|
+
authors: [mdkg]
|
|
7
|
+
links: [AGENT_START.md, CLI_COMMAND_MATRIX.md]
|
|
8
|
+
---
|
|
9
|
+
|
|
10
|
+
# Goal
|
|
11
|
+
|
|
12
|
+
Move one durable mdkg loop forward without prematurely closing, blocking, or
|
|
13
|
+
shrinking the loop definition of done.
|
|
14
|
+
|
|
15
|
+
## When To Use
|
|
16
|
+
|
|
17
|
+
- A user has selected or named a `type: loop` node.
|
|
18
|
+
- A reusable audit, planning, or implementation process should work across
|
|
19
|
+
several linked goals, tasks, tests, spikes, proposals, checkpoints, or
|
|
20
|
+
decisions.
|
|
21
|
+
- A loop should keep making progress after one branch hits a decision point.
|
|
22
|
+
|
|
23
|
+
## Inputs
|
|
24
|
+
|
|
25
|
+
- Repo root
|
|
26
|
+
- Loop id, qid, or template alias
|
|
27
|
+
- Loop node, required evidence lanes, child refs, linked goals, output refs,
|
|
28
|
+
decision refs, approval refs, and blocker policy
|
|
29
|
+
- Current user constraints, available approvals, and stop conditions
|
|
30
|
+
|
|
31
|
+
## Steps
|
|
32
|
+
|
|
33
|
+
1. Resolve the loop with `mdkg loop show <loop> --json`.
|
|
34
|
+
2. Inspect identity-scoped readiness with `mdkg loop plan <loop> --json`.
|
|
35
|
+
3. Route with `mdkg loop next <loop> --json`; prefer its authorized child or
|
|
36
|
+
recovery selection unless current graph evidence justifies an override.
|
|
37
|
+
4. Build context with `mdkg pack <loop> --pack-profile concise --dry-run --stats`.
|
|
38
|
+
5. Build a completion matrix: lane, required/optional, linked refs, allowed
|
|
39
|
+
actions, needed evidence, status, blockers, recovery node, and accepted
|
|
40
|
+
decision or waiver.
|
|
41
|
+
6. Surface pre-run questions before beginning when the loop template declares
|
|
42
|
+
external calls, privileged tools, multi-agent delegation, publish, deploy,
|
|
43
|
+
provider, or policy-sensitive decisions.
|
|
44
|
+
7. Treat read-only and planning loops as pre-approved for low-risk local work:
|
|
45
|
+
source/doc/mdkg inspection, local discovery commands, local tests/builds that
|
|
46
|
+
may write caches or generated outputs outside committed source, mdkg evidence
|
|
47
|
+
nodes, and provisional triage.
|
|
48
|
+
8. Do not treat read-only/planning preapproval as permission for functional
|
|
49
|
+
source changes, push/publish/tag/deploy, external metadata-disclosing calls,
|
|
50
|
+
privileged tools, or subagent delegation unless approval is explicit.
|
|
51
|
+
9. Work the linked graph, not just the first branch. If one branch is blocked,
|
|
52
|
+
record blocker recovery and continue another authorized branch.
|
|
53
|
+
10. Classify blockers as `recoverable_now`, `branch_blocked`,
|
|
54
|
+
`definition_blocking`, or `residual`.
|
|
55
|
+
11. For non-trivial blockers, create or update a source-grounded spike, proposal
|
|
56
|
+
or open-question section with at least three viable paths, one recommended
|
|
57
|
+
path, and blocker evidence.
|
|
58
|
+
12. Continue while any authorized, in-scope, linked work remains actionable.
|
|
59
|
+
13. Bind answers, approvals, evidence, and waivers to stable identities with
|
|
60
|
+
`question_answer_refs`, `action_approval_refs`, `evidence_lane_refs`,
|
|
61
|
+
`lane_waiver_decision_refs`, and `lane_waiver_approval_refs`. A waiver
|
|
62
|
+
requires both an accepted decision and verified approval for the same lane.
|
|
63
|
+
14. Mark the loop done only when every required lane is complete or explicitly
|
|
64
|
+
waived and the loop body explains why the definition of done is satisfied.
|
|
65
|
+
15. Mark the loop blocked only when no authorized, useful, in-scope linked work
|
|
66
|
+
remains across the loop graph and the loop records required decisions,
|
|
67
|
+
follow-up work, and unblock paths. Confirm
|
|
68
|
+
`exhaustion.whole_loop_blocked: true` from `mdkg loop next --json` against
|
|
69
|
+
current graph state before stopping.
|
|
70
|
+
|
|
71
|
+
## Outputs
|
|
72
|
+
|
|
73
|
+
- Completion matrix for the loop
|
|
74
|
+
- Evidence recorded on linked children and summarized on the loop
|
|
75
|
+
- Provisional decisions, open questions, approval requests, and residual
|
|
76
|
+
follow-up work
|
|
77
|
+
- A clear stop reason: continue, done, blocked, or waiting for approval
|
|
78
|
+
|
|
79
|
+
## Required Capabilities
|
|
80
|
+
|
|
81
|
+
- mdkg loop inspection and packing
|
|
82
|
+
- mdkg graph search/show/validate
|
|
83
|
+
- Source and documentation review
|
|
84
|
+
- Local command execution within the loop's authorization
|
|
85
|
+
- Proposal, decision, spike, task, test, and checkpoint authoring
|
|
86
|
+
|
|
87
|
+
## Resources Touched
|
|
88
|
+
|
|
89
|
+
- `.mdkg/work/<loop>.md`
|
|
90
|
+
- Linked child nodes under `.mdkg/work/`
|
|
91
|
+
- Linked design and decision docs under `.mdkg/design/`
|
|
92
|
+
- Local source/docs/test files only for read-only inspection unless the loop is
|
|
93
|
+
explicitly write-capable
|
|
94
|
+
|
|
95
|
+
## Validation Checks
|
|
96
|
+
|
|
97
|
+
- `git status --short --branch`
|
|
98
|
+
- `mdkg loop show <loop> --json`
|
|
99
|
+
- `mdkg loop plan <loop> --json`
|
|
100
|
+
- `mdkg loop next <loop> --json`
|
|
101
|
+
- `mdkg pack <loop> --pack-profile concise --dry-run --stats`
|
|
102
|
+
- `mdkg validate --changed-only --json`
|
|
103
|
+
- `mdkg validate --summary --json --limit 20`
|
|
104
|
+
- Loop-specific local checks from the template or linked child nodes
|
|
105
|
+
|
|
106
|
+
## Closeout Evidence
|
|
107
|
+
|
|
108
|
+
- Completion matrix with every required lane classified
|
|
109
|
+
- Evidence refs for completed lanes
|
|
110
|
+
- Decision refs or approval refs for accepted waivers
|
|
111
|
+
- Follow-up nodes split into definition-blocking and residual work
|
|
112
|
+
- Validation receipts
|
|
113
|
+
- A loop summary that states why the loop is done, blocked, or continuing
|
|
114
|
+
|
|
115
|
+
## Safety
|
|
116
|
+
|
|
117
|
+
- Do not mark a loop done merely because follow-up nodes were created.
|
|
118
|
+
- Do not mark a loop blocked while authorized linked work remains actionable.
|
|
119
|
+
- Do not shrink the loop definition of done without a durable decision or
|
|
120
|
+
approval record.
|
|
121
|
+
- Treat external advisory checks, provider calls, publish/deploy actions, and
|
|
122
|
+
multi-agent delegation as approval-gated unless the loop has explicit
|
|
123
|
+
pre-approval.
|
|
124
|
+
- Communicate provisional decisions and open questions to the human or
|
|
125
|
+
higher-level orchestrator before treating them as accepted.
|
|
126
|
+
|
|
127
|
+
## Failure Handling
|
|
128
|
+
|
|
129
|
+
- If pre-run approvals are missing, record the decision request and continue
|
|
130
|
+
authorized local lanes.
|
|
131
|
+
- If all branches are blocked, create or update spike/proposal/decision-request
|
|
132
|
+
nodes before marking the loop blocked.
|
|
133
|
+
- If validation fails, keep the loop open and record the failing lane.
|
|
134
|
+
- If the loop template lacks required evidence lanes, create a template
|
|
135
|
+
hardening task instead of silently closing the loop.
|
|
136
|
+
|
|
137
|
+
## Related Manifests
|
|
138
|
+
|
|
139
|
+
- Future loop-runner or orchestrator agent manifests.
|
|
140
|
+
|
|
141
|
+
## Projection Targets
|
|
142
|
+
|
|
143
|
+
- `.agents/skills/pursue-mdkg-loop`
|
|
144
|
+
- `.claude/skills/pursue-mdkg-loop`
|
|
145
|
+
- `assets/init/skills/default/pursue-mdkg-loop`
|
|
146
|
+
|
|
147
|
+
## Open Questions
|
|
148
|
+
|
|
149
|
+
- Should mdkg add first-class approval nodes later, or keep approvals as typed
|
|
150
|
+
decision refs plus checkpoint, receipt, and external approval refs?
|
|
@@ -0,0 +1,160 @@
|
|
|
1
|
+
---
|
|
2
|
+
id: {{id}}
|
|
3
|
+
type: loop
|
|
4
|
+
title: {{title}}
|
|
5
|
+
status: {{status}}
|
|
6
|
+
priority: {{priority}}
|
|
7
|
+
loop_mode: planning
|
|
8
|
+
loop_role: scoped
|
|
9
|
+
scope_refs: []
|
|
10
|
+
scope_description: Set the repo folder goal or project area this loop governs.
|
|
11
|
+
template_refs: []
|
|
12
|
+
materialization_mode: default_children
|
|
13
|
+
child_refs: []
|
|
14
|
+
pre_run_questions: [scope_authority, local_cache_writes_approved, external_calls_approved]
|
|
15
|
+
question_answer_refs: []
|
|
16
|
+
pre_approved_actions: [read_source, run_local_discovery, create_mdkg_evidence]
|
|
17
|
+
approval_gated_actions: [external_calls]
|
|
18
|
+
required_actions: [read_source, run_local_discovery, create_mdkg_evidence]
|
|
19
|
+
requested_actions: [read_source, run_local_discovery, create_mdkg_evidence]
|
|
20
|
+
prohibited_actions: [functional_changes, push_publish_deploy]
|
|
21
|
+
action_approval_refs: []
|
|
22
|
+
evidence_lanes: [required_evidence, blocker_recovery, closeout_matrix]
|
|
23
|
+
evidence_lane_refs: []
|
|
24
|
+
lane_waiver_refs: []
|
|
25
|
+
lane_waiver_decision_refs: []
|
|
26
|
+
lane_waiver_approval_refs: []
|
|
27
|
+
run_refs: []
|
|
28
|
+
decision_refs: []
|
|
29
|
+
output_refs: []
|
|
30
|
+
approval_refs: []
|
|
31
|
+
evaluation_refs: []
|
|
32
|
+
definition_of_done: Loop required evidence lanes are complete or explicitly waived, and the closeout matrix records why the loop is done, blocked, or continuing.
|
|
33
|
+
blocker_policy: spike_proposal_recommendation_continue
|
|
34
|
+
epic: {{epic}}
|
|
35
|
+
parent: {{parent}}
|
|
36
|
+
prev: {{prev}}
|
|
37
|
+
next: {{next}}
|
|
38
|
+
tags: []
|
|
39
|
+
owners: []
|
|
40
|
+
links: []
|
|
41
|
+
artifacts: []
|
|
42
|
+
relates: []
|
|
43
|
+
blocked_by: []
|
|
44
|
+
blocks: []
|
|
45
|
+
refs: []
|
|
46
|
+
context_refs: []
|
|
47
|
+
evidence_refs: []
|
|
48
|
+
aliases: []
|
|
49
|
+
skills: [pursue-mdkg-loop]
|
|
50
|
+
created: {{created}}
|
|
51
|
+
updated: {{updated}}
|
|
52
|
+
---
|
|
53
|
+
|
|
54
|
+
# Operating Model
|
|
55
|
+
|
|
56
|
+
Describe the reusable process this loop represents and the work it should coordinate.
|
|
57
|
+
|
|
58
|
+
# Scope
|
|
59
|
+
|
|
60
|
+
State the repository, folder, goal, or project area this loop applies to.
|
|
61
|
+
|
|
62
|
+
# Definition Of Done
|
|
63
|
+
|
|
64
|
+
Define the high bar this loop must reach before it can close. A loop must not
|
|
65
|
+
close merely because follow-up nodes were created.
|
|
66
|
+
|
|
67
|
+
# Required Evidence Lanes
|
|
68
|
+
|
|
69
|
+
List the lanes the loop must complete or explicitly waive.
|
|
70
|
+
|
|
71
|
+
| Lane | Required | Evidence Needed | Status | Blocker | Recovery Node | Decision Or Waiver |
|
|
72
|
+
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
|
|
73
|
+
| example lane | yes | source-grounded evidence | todo | none | none | none |
|
|
74
|
+
|
|
75
|
+
# Pre-Run Questions
|
|
76
|
+
|
|
77
|
+
Ask these before execution when the loop needs configuration or approval.
|
|
78
|
+
|
|
79
|
+
- Which scope is authoritative for this run?
|
|
80
|
+
- Are external network, provider, registry, security, browser, or multi-agent
|
|
81
|
+
calls approved?
|
|
82
|
+
- Are local test/build commands approved when they write caches or generated
|
|
83
|
+
outputs outside committed source?
|
|
84
|
+
|
|
85
|
+
# Pre-Approved Read-Only Actions
|
|
86
|
+
|
|
87
|
+
- Read source, docs, mdkg graph, package metadata, configs, and tests.
|
|
88
|
+
- Run local discovery commands and local tests/builds when allowed by the loop
|
|
89
|
+
or user.
|
|
90
|
+
- Create mdkg evidence, spike, proposal, task, test, checkpoint, and
|
|
91
|
+
open-question nodes.
|
|
92
|
+
- Make provisional triage decisions and record them for human or orchestrator
|
|
93
|
+
approval.
|
|
94
|
+
|
|
95
|
+
# Approval-Gated Actions
|
|
96
|
+
|
|
97
|
+
- Functional source, docs, template, generated command, or runtime changes.
|
|
98
|
+
- Push, publish, tag, deploy, DNS, analytics, provider, or external registry
|
|
99
|
+
actions.
|
|
100
|
+
- External calls that disclose repository, package, dependency, user, or
|
|
101
|
+
provider metadata.
|
|
102
|
+
- Subagent or privileged tool delegation unless explicitly approved.
|
|
103
|
+
|
|
104
|
+
# Child Node Materialization
|
|
105
|
+
|
|
106
|
+
- Default child nodes to create immediately.
|
|
107
|
+
- Planning-only or no-child mode expectations.
|
|
108
|
+
|
|
109
|
+
# Template Lineage
|
|
110
|
+
|
|
111
|
+
- Template source.
|
|
112
|
+
- Forked scope.
|
|
113
|
+
- Local specialization.
|
|
114
|
+
- Reusable improvements to promote back.
|
|
115
|
+
|
|
116
|
+
# Run And Evidence Model
|
|
117
|
+
|
|
118
|
+
- Run records or event streams.
|
|
119
|
+
- Evidence, observations, findings, decisions, outputs, and receipts.
|
|
120
|
+
|
|
121
|
+
# Blocker Continuation Policy
|
|
122
|
+
|
|
123
|
+
When a branch is blocked, classify it as `recoverable_now`, `branch_blocked`,
|
|
124
|
+
`definition_blocking`, or `residual`.
|
|
125
|
+
|
|
126
|
+
- `recoverable_now`: request approval, use an approved local proof path, or run
|
|
127
|
+
an already authorized tool.
|
|
128
|
+
- `branch_blocked`: create or update a spike/proposal/options node, record
|
|
129
|
+
blocker evidence, and continue other linked work.
|
|
130
|
+
- `definition_blocking`: keep the loop open until the missing lane is completed
|
|
131
|
+
or explicitly waived.
|
|
132
|
+
- `residual`: create follow-up work, mark it non-blocking, and allow closeout
|
|
133
|
+
only if all required lanes are otherwise satisfied.
|
|
134
|
+
|
|
135
|
+
Whole-loop blocked state is allowed only when no authorized, useful, in-scope
|
|
136
|
+
linked work remains across the loop graph.
|
|
137
|
+
|
|
138
|
+
# Waiver And Decision Policy
|
|
139
|
+
|
|
140
|
+
- Use proposal or open-question nodes for candidate waivers.
|
|
141
|
+
- Use `decision_refs` for accepted design, product, or policy waivers.
|
|
142
|
+
- Use `approval_refs` for concrete human/orchestrator approval receipts,
|
|
143
|
+
artifacts, or future approval nodes.
|
|
144
|
+
- A simple body section is transitional MVP evidence only; prefer durable linked
|
|
145
|
+
nodes for long-lived waivers.
|
|
146
|
+
|
|
147
|
+
# Closeout Matrix
|
|
148
|
+
|
|
149
|
+
Before marking the loop done or blocked, update the required evidence lane table
|
|
150
|
+
and explain why each lane is complete, waived, residual, or blocking.
|
|
151
|
+
|
|
152
|
+
# Validation Plan
|
|
153
|
+
|
|
154
|
+
- Parser and template validation.
|
|
155
|
+
- Search, show, list, index, and pack visibility.
|
|
156
|
+
- Fork provenance and child materialization checks.
|
|
157
|
+
|
|
158
|
+
# Current State
|
|
159
|
+
|
|
160
|
+
- Not run yet.
|
|
@@ -0,0 +1,117 @@
|
|
|
1
|
+
---
|
|
2
|
+
id: loop-3
|
|
3
|
+
type: loop
|
|
4
|
+
title: Backend API CLI Bloat Audit
|
|
5
|
+
status: todo
|
|
6
|
+
priority: 1
|
|
7
|
+
loop_mode: readonly
|
|
8
|
+
loop_role: template
|
|
9
|
+
scope_refs: []
|
|
10
|
+
scope_description: Backend service API or CLI surface selected for modularity and bloat review.
|
|
11
|
+
template_refs: []
|
|
12
|
+
materialization_mode: default_children
|
|
13
|
+
child_refs: []
|
|
14
|
+
pre_run_questions: [scope_surface, local_cache_writes_approved, external_compatibility_checks_approved, optimization_priority]
|
|
15
|
+
question_answer_refs: []
|
|
16
|
+
pre_approved_actions: [read_source, inspect_help_and_contracts, run_local_inventory, create_mdkg_evidence]
|
|
17
|
+
approval_gated_actions: [external_compatibility_checks, downstream_repo_checks]
|
|
18
|
+
required_actions: [read_source, inspect_help_and_contracts, run_local_inventory, create_mdkg_evidence]
|
|
19
|
+
requested_actions: [read_source, inspect_help_and_contracts, run_local_inventory, create_mdkg_evidence]
|
|
20
|
+
prohibited_actions: [functional_changes, push_publish_deploy]
|
|
21
|
+
action_approval_refs: []
|
|
22
|
+
evidence_lanes: [public_command_api_inventory, flag_option_sprawl, ownership_boundaries, duplicated_command_logic, compatibility_risk, simplification_proposals]
|
|
23
|
+
evidence_lane_refs: []
|
|
24
|
+
lane_waiver_refs: []
|
|
25
|
+
lane_waiver_decision_refs: []
|
|
26
|
+
lane_waiver_approval_refs: []
|
|
27
|
+
run_refs: []
|
|
28
|
+
decision_refs: []
|
|
29
|
+
output_refs: []
|
|
30
|
+
approval_refs: []
|
|
31
|
+
evaluation_refs: []
|
|
32
|
+
definition_of_done: Backend API or CLI complexity lanes are reviewed or explicitly waived, and simplification recommendations are source-grounded.
|
|
33
|
+
blocker_policy: spike_proposal_recommendation_continue
|
|
34
|
+
tags: [loop-template, audit, backend, api, cli]
|
|
35
|
+
owners: []
|
|
36
|
+
links: []
|
|
37
|
+
artifacts: []
|
|
38
|
+
relates: []
|
|
39
|
+
blocked_by: []
|
|
40
|
+
blocks: []
|
|
41
|
+
refs: []
|
|
42
|
+
context_refs: []
|
|
43
|
+
evidence_refs: []
|
|
44
|
+
aliases: [backend-cli-bloat-audit-loop]
|
|
45
|
+
skills: [pursue-mdkg-loop]
|
|
46
|
+
created: 2026-07-06
|
|
47
|
+
updated: 2026-07-06
|
|
48
|
+
---
|
|
49
|
+
|
|
50
|
+
# Operating Model
|
|
51
|
+
|
|
52
|
+
Run a read-only audit for backend, API, and CLI design bloat. Look for sprawling flags, mixed ownership, duplicated command logic, weak module boundaries, and overly broad abstractions.
|
|
53
|
+
|
|
54
|
+
# Default Child Nodes
|
|
55
|
+
|
|
56
|
+
- Spike for command/API inventory.
|
|
57
|
+
- Proposal node for simplification paths.
|
|
58
|
+
- Task nodes for focused refactors that preserve behavior.
|
|
59
|
+
|
|
60
|
+
# Definition Of Done
|
|
61
|
+
|
|
62
|
+
- Public surfaces and core ownership boundaries are inventoried.
|
|
63
|
+
- Bloat or coupling risks are tied to concrete source locations.
|
|
64
|
+
- Command/API flag sprawl, mixed ownership, duplicate handlers, module
|
|
65
|
+
cohesion, and output/help consistency are reviewed or explicitly waived.
|
|
66
|
+
- Recommendations preserve compatibility unless explicitly accepted otherwise.
|
|
67
|
+
- Follow-up work is classified as definition-blocking or residual.
|
|
68
|
+
|
|
69
|
+
# Required Evidence Lanes
|
|
70
|
+
|
|
71
|
+
| Lane | Required | Evidence Needed | Status | Blocker | Recovery Node | Decision Or Waiver |
|
|
72
|
+
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
|
|
73
|
+
| public command/API inventory | yes | command/API list and source refs | todo | none | none | none |
|
|
74
|
+
| flag and option sprawl | yes | flagged commands/options with rationale | todo | none | none | none |
|
|
75
|
+
| ownership boundaries | yes | module/command boundary notes | todo | none | none | none |
|
|
76
|
+
| duplicated command logic | yes | repeated handlers or helpers | todo | none | none | none |
|
|
77
|
+
| compatibility risk | yes | behavior-preserving recommendations | todo | external behavior may need proof | spike/proposal | none |
|
|
78
|
+
| simplification proposals | yes | at least three paths for major changes | todo | none | none | none |
|
|
79
|
+
|
|
80
|
+
# Pre-Run Questions
|
|
81
|
+
|
|
82
|
+
- Which command, API, package, or backend surface is in scope?
|
|
83
|
+
- Are local tests/builds approved when they write caches or generated outputs?
|
|
84
|
+
- Are external compatibility checks, service calls, or downstream repo checks
|
|
85
|
+
approved?
|
|
86
|
+
- Should recommendations optimize for compatibility, simplicity, performance, or
|
|
87
|
+
public CLI ergonomics first?
|
|
88
|
+
|
|
89
|
+
# Pre-Approved Read-Only Actions
|
|
90
|
+
|
|
91
|
+
- Inspect source, command registration, help text, tests, docs, generated command
|
|
92
|
+
references, and package metadata.
|
|
93
|
+
- Run local CLI help, local tests/builds, `rg`, `mdkg show/search/pack/validate`,
|
|
94
|
+
and static command/API inventory scripts.
|
|
95
|
+
- Create mdkg spikes, proposals, tasks, tests, checkpoints, and open questions.
|
|
96
|
+
|
|
97
|
+
# Approval-Gated Actions
|
|
98
|
+
|
|
99
|
+
- Functional code, docs, template, generated command, or public CLI behavior
|
|
100
|
+
changes.
|
|
101
|
+
- External service calls or downstream compatibility checks.
|
|
102
|
+
- Push, publish, tag, deploy, or provider-side actions.
|
|
103
|
+
|
|
104
|
+
# Blocker Continuation
|
|
105
|
+
|
|
106
|
+
If external service behavior or compatibility impact cannot be proven, create a
|
|
107
|
+
spike, propose at least three viable paths, recommend one path, record blocker
|
|
108
|
+
evidence, and continue local source, docs, help, and test analysis.
|
|
109
|
+
|
|
110
|
+
Do not mark the whole loop blocked while another command/API lane remains
|
|
111
|
+
actionable. Do not close the loop until required lanes are complete or linked to
|
|
112
|
+
accepted `decision_refs` or `approval_refs`.
|
|
113
|
+
|
|
114
|
+
# Closeout Matrix
|
|
115
|
+
|
|
116
|
+
Classify follow-up work as compatibility-blocking, simplification residual,
|
|
117
|
+
accepted waiver, or false positive before marking the loop done or blocked.
|
|
@@ -0,0 +1,117 @@
|
|
|
1
|
+
---
|
|
2
|
+
id: loop-2
|
|
3
|
+
type: loop
|
|
4
|
+
title: Design Frontend UX Audit
|
|
5
|
+
status: todo
|
|
6
|
+
priority: 1
|
|
7
|
+
loop_mode: readonly
|
|
8
|
+
loop_role: template
|
|
9
|
+
scope_refs: []
|
|
10
|
+
scope_description: Frontend application or user flow selected for design and UX audit.
|
|
11
|
+
template_refs: []
|
|
12
|
+
materialization_mode: default_children
|
|
13
|
+
child_refs: []
|
|
14
|
+
pre_run_questions: [target_surface, design_standard, browser_checks_approved, accessibility_priority]
|
|
15
|
+
question_answer_refs: []
|
|
16
|
+
pre_approved_actions: [read_source, inspect_design_tokens, capture_local_screenshots, create_mdkg_evidence]
|
|
17
|
+
approval_gated_actions: [external_design_tools]
|
|
18
|
+
required_actions: [read_source, inspect_design_tokens, capture_local_screenshots, create_mdkg_evidence]
|
|
19
|
+
requested_actions: [read_source, inspect_design_tokens, capture_local_screenshots, create_mdkg_evidence]
|
|
20
|
+
prohibited_actions: [visual_redesign_changes, deploy_preview_changes, push_publish_deploy]
|
|
21
|
+
action_approval_refs: []
|
|
22
|
+
evidence_lanes: [visual_consistency, accessibility_contrast, responsive_layout, interaction_ergonomics, design_system_fit, recommendations]
|
|
23
|
+
evidence_lane_refs: []
|
|
24
|
+
lane_waiver_refs: []
|
|
25
|
+
lane_waiver_decision_refs: []
|
|
26
|
+
lane_waiver_approval_refs: []
|
|
27
|
+
run_refs: []
|
|
28
|
+
decision_refs: []
|
|
29
|
+
output_refs: []
|
|
30
|
+
approval_refs: []
|
|
31
|
+
evaluation_refs: []
|
|
32
|
+
definition_of_done: UX and visual quality lanes are audited or explicitly waived against product design system and accessibility expectations.
|
|
33
|
+
blocker_policy: spike_proposal_recommendation_continue
|
|
34
|
+
tags: [loop-template, audit, design, ux, frontend]
|
|
35
|
+
owners: []
|
|
36
|
+
links: []
|
|
37
|
+
artifacts: []
|
|
38
|
+
relates: []
|
|
39
|
+
blocked_by: []
|
|
40
|
+
blocks: []
|
|
41
|
+
refs: []
|
|
42
|
+
context_refs: []
|
|
43
|
+
evidence_refs: []
|
|
44
|
+
aliases: [design-ux-audit-loop]
|
|
45
|
+
skills: [pursue-mdkg-loop]
|
|
46
|
+
created: 2026-07-06
|
|
47
|
+
updated: 2026-07-06
|
|
48
|
+
---
|
|
49
|
+
|
|
50
|
+
# Operating Model
|
|
51
|
+
|
|
52
|
+
Run a read-only design and frontend UX audit. Compare the current interface against the local design system, product intent, accessibility expectations, contrast, responsive behavior, and interaction polish.
|
|
53
|
+
|
|
54
|
+
# Default Child Nodes
|
|
55
|
+
|
|
56
|
+
- Spike for product/design context and screenshot inventory.
|
|
57
|
+
- Test nodes for accessibility, contrast, and responsive checks.
|
|
58
|
+
- Proposal node for prioritized UX improvements.
|
|
59
|
+
|
|
60
|
+
# Definition Of Done
|
|
61
|
+
|
|
62
|
+
- Screens or flows are inspected with evidence.
|
|
63
|
+
- Design-system drift, accessibility issues, and UX friction are identified.
|
|
64
|
+
- Contrast, responsive behavior, interaction states, copy clarity, and visual
|
|
65
|
+
hierarchy are reviewed or explicitly waived.
|
|
66
|
+
- Recommendations are prioritized by user impact and implementation risk.
|
|
67
|
+
- Follow-up work is classified as definition-blocking or residual.
|
|
68
|
+
|
|
69
|
+
# Required Evidence Lanes
|
|
70
|
+
|
|
71
|
+
| Lane | Required | Evidence Needed | Status | Blocker | Recovery Node | Decision Or Waiver |
|
|
72
|
+
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
|
|
73
|
+
| route/screen inventory | yes | screens, flows, or source routes | todo | none | none | none |
|
|
74
|
+
| design-system alignment | yes | local tokens/components/standards review | todo | none | none | none |
|
|
75
|
+
| accessibility and contrast | yes | local proof or code-level review | todo | visual runtime may be unavailable | spike/proposal | none |
|
|
76
|
+
| responsive behavior | yes | viewport proof or source-grounded review | todo | browser/runtime may be unavailable | spike/proposal | none |
|
|
77
|
+
| interaction states | scope-dependent | hover/focus/error/loading review | todo | none | none | none |
|
|
78
|
+
| prioritized recommendations | yes | user impact and risk ordering | todo | none | none | none |
|
|
79
|
+
|
|
80
|
+
# Pre-Run Questions
|
|
81
|
+
|
|
82
|
+
- Which routes, screens, or flows are in scope?
|
|
83
|
+
- Is browser/runtime proof approved or available?
|
|
84
|
+
- Are local builds/tests approved when they write caches or generated outputs?
|
|
85
|
+
- Should the audit optimize toward current local design, ChatGPT/Codex-inspired
|
|
86
|
+
interaction polish, accessibility, density, or conversion?
|
|
87
|
+
|
|
88
|
+
# Pre-Approved Read-Only Actions
|
|
89
|
+
|
|
90
|
+
- Inspect frontend source, design docs, tokens, CSS, components, screenshots,
|
|
91
|
+
generated static output, and local docs.
|
|
92
|
+
- Run local builds/tests, static accessibility checks, `rg`, mdkg commands, and
|
|
93
|
+
browser checks when available locally.
|
|
94
|
+
- Create mdkg findings, screenshots/artifact refs, proposals, tasks, tests, and
|
|
95
|
+
open questions.
|
|
96
|
+
|
|
97
|
+
# Approval-Gated Actions
|
|
98
|
+
|
|
99
|
+
- Functional UI/code/docs changes.
|
|
100
|
+
- External design tools, provider calls, deploys, analytics, or production
|
|
101
|
+
browser-session actions.
|
|
102
|
+
|
|
103
|
+
# Blocker Continuation
|
|
104
|
+
|
|
105
|
+
If visual runtime proof is blocked, write a spike with source-grounded options,
|
|
106
|
+
propose at least three ways to obtain evidence, recommend one path, mark blocker
|
|
107
|
+
evidence, and continue code-level design-system, accessibility, and interaction
|
|
108
|
+
analysis.
|
|
109
|
+
|
|
110
|
+
Do not mark the whole loop blocked while another UX lane remains actionable. Do
|
|
111
|
+
not close the loop until required lanes are complete or linked to accepted
|
|
112
|
+
`decision_refs` or `approval_refs`.
|
|
113
|
+
|
|
114
|
+
# Closeout Matrix
|
|
115
|
+
|
|
116
|
+
Classify follow-up work as definition-blocking UX evidence, residual polish,
|
|
117
|
+
accepted waiver, or false positive before marking the loop done or blocked.
|
|
@@ -0,0 +1,114 @@
|
|
|
1
|
+
---
|
|
2
|
+
id: loop-5
|
|
3
|
+
type: loop
|
|
4
|
+
title: Duplicate Code And Linting Audit
|
|
5
|
+
status: todo
|
|
6
|
+
priority: 1
|
|
7
|
+
loop_mode: readonly
|
|
8
|
+
loop_role: template
|
|
9
|
+
scope_refs: []
|
|
10
|
+
scope_description: Repository package or folder selected for duplication lint and static-quality review.
|
|
11
|
+
template_refs: []
|
|
12
|
+
materialization_mode: default_children
|
|
13
|
+
child_refs: []
|
|
14
|
+
pre_run_questions: [target_scope, local_lint_checks_approved, generated_output_policy]
|
|
15
|
+
question_answer_refs: []
|
|
16
|
+
pre_approved_actions: [read_source, run_local_lint_inventory, inspect_duplicates, create_mdkg_evidence]
|
|
17
|
+
approval_gated_actions: []
|
|
18
|
+
required_actions: [read_source, run_local_lint_inventory, inspect_duplicates, create_mdkg_evidence]
|
|
19
|
+
requested_actions: [read_source, run_local_lint_inventory, inspect_duplicates, create_mdkg_evidence]
|
|
20
|
+
prohibited_actions: [automatic_refactors, formatter_rewrites, dependency_changes, push_publish_deploy]
|
|
21
|
+
action_approval_refs: []
|
|
22
|
+
evidence_lanes: [duplicate_code_inventory, linting_baseline, refactor_candidates, false_positive_triage, recommendations]
|
|
23
|
+
evidence_lane_refs: []
|
|
24
|
+
lane_waiver_refs: []
|
|
25
|
+
lane_waiver_decision_refs: []
|
|
26
|
+
lane_waiver_approval_refs: []
|
|
27
|
+
run_refs: []
|
|
28
|
+
decision_refs: []
|
|
29
|
+
output_refs: []
|
|
30
|
+
approval_refs: []
|
|
31
|
+
evaluation_refs: []
|
|
32
|
+
definition_of_done: Duplicate logic and static-quality lanes are reviewed or explicitly waived with practical follow-up recommendations.
|
|
33
|
+
blocker_policy: spike_proposal_recommendation_continue
|
|
34
|
+
tags: [loop-template, audit, duplicate-code, linting]
|
|
35
|
+
owners: []
|
|
36
|
+
links: []
|
|
37
|
+
artifacts: []
|
|
38
|
+
relates: []
|
|
39
|
+
blocked_by: []
|
|
40
|
+
blocks: []
|
|
41
|
+
refs: []
|
|
42
|
+
context_refs: []
|
|
43
|
+
evidence_refs: []
|
|
44
|
+
aliases: [duplicate-lint-audit-loop]
|
|
45
|
+
skills: [pursue-mdkg-loop]
|
|
46
|
+
created: 2026-07-06
|
|
47
|
+
updated: 2026-07-06
|
|
48
|
+
---
|
|
49
|
+
|
|
50
|
+
# Operating Model
|
|
51
|
+
|
|
52
|
+
Run a read-only duplication and linting audit. Use static analysis, existing linters, search, and source review to find repeated logic, inconsistent patterns, and preventable quality drift.
|
|
53
|
+
|
|
54
|
+
# Default Child Nodes
|
|
55
|
+
|
|
56
|
+
- Spike for duplicated pattern inventory.
|
|
57
|
+
- Test nodes for lint or static-analysis coverage.
|
|
58
|
+
- Task nodes for low-risk consolidation opportunities.
|
|
59
|
+
|
|
60
|
+
# Definition Of Done
|
|
61
|
+
|
|
62
|
+
- Duplicate or near-duplicate logic is identified with source evidence.
|
|
63
|
+
- Linting and formatting gaps are reviewed.
|
|
64
|
+
- Existing static-quality tools, repeated utility patterns, and avoidable
|
|
65
|
+
divergence are reviewed or explicitly waived.
|
|
66
|
+
- Recommendations avoid broad refactors without measurable payoff.
|
|
67
|
+
- Follow-up work is classified as definition-blocking or residual.
|
|
68
|
+
|
|
69
|
+
# Required Evidence Lanes
|
|
70
|
+
|
|
71
|
+
| Lane | Required | Evidence Needed | Status | Blocker | Recovery Node | Decision Or Waiver |
|
|
72
|
+
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
|
|
73
|
+
| duplicate logic search | yes | repeated functions/modules/source refs | todo | none | none | none |
|
|
74
|
+
| lint/format config review | yes | tool configs and current command behavior | todo | local tools may fail | spike/proposal | none |
|
|
75
|
+
| repeated utility patterns | yes | consolidation candidates and tradeoffs | todo | none | none | none |
|
|
76
|
+
| generated/vendor exclusions | yes | exclusion rationale | todo | none | none | none |
|
|
77
|
+
| recommendations | yes | scoped payoff/risk notes | todo | none | none | none |
|
|
78
|
+
|
|
79
|
+
# Pre-Run Questions
|
|
80
|
+
|
|
81
|
+
- Which folders or packages are in scope?
|
|
82
|
+
- Are local lint/test/build commands approved when they write caches or generated
|
|
83
|
+
outputs?
|
|
84
|
+
- Which generated, vendor, fixture, or snapshot folders should be excluded?
|
|
85
|
+
|
|
86
|
+
# Pre-Approved Read-Only Actions
|
|
87
|
+
|
|
88
|
+
- Inspect source, tests, configs, scripts, generated references, and mdkg graph.
|
|
89
|
+
- Run local search, lint, format check, tests/builds, and static analysis tools
|
|
90
|
+
that do not call external services.
|
|
91
|
+
- Create mdkg evidence, consolidation proposals, tasks, tests, and open
|
|
92
|
+
questions.
|
|
93
|
+
|
|
94
|
+
# Approval-Gated Actions
|
|
95
|
+
|
|
96
|
+
- Functional refactors, formatting rewrites, generated updates, or dependency
|
|
97
|
+
changes.
|
|
98
|
+
- External tools or service calls.
|
|
99
|
+
|
|
100
|
+
# Blocker Continuation
|
|
101
|
+
|
|
102
|
+
If tools cannot run locally, create a spike, propose at least three options for
|
|
103
|
+
proof, recommend one path, mark blocker evidence, and continue search-based
|
|
104
|
+
source review and config inspection.
|
|
105
|
+
|
|
106
|
+
Do not mark the whole loop blocked while another duplicate/lint lane remains
|
|
107
|
+
actionable. Do not close the loop until required lanes are complete or linked to
|
|
108
|
+
accepted `decision_refs` or `approval_refs`.
|
|
109
|
+
|
|
110
|
+
# Closeout Matrix
|
|
111
|
+
|
|
112
|
+
Classify follow-up work as definition-blocking tool evidence, residual
|
|
113
|
+
consolidation, accepted waiver, or false positive before marking the loop done
|
|
114
|
+
or blocked.
|