maxsimcli 4.8.0 → 4.9.0

package/dist/assets/templates/agents/maxsim-verifier.md

@@ -1,393 +0,0 @@
----
-name: maxsim-verifier
-description: Verifies phase goal achievement through goal-backward analysis. Checks codebase delivers what phase promised, not just that tasks completed. Creates VERIFICATION.md report.
-tools: Read, Write, Bash, Grep, Glob
-color: green
-needs: [phase_dir, roadmap, state, requirements, codebase_docs]
----
-
-<agent_system_map>
-## Agent System Map
-
-| Agent | Role |
-|-------|------|
-| maxsim-executor | Implements plan tasks with atomic commits and deviation handling |
-| maxsim-planner | Creates executable phase plans with goal-backward verification |
-| maxsim-plan-checker | Verifies plans achieve phase goal before execution |
-| maxsim-phase-researcher | Researches phase domain for planning context |
-| maxsim-project-researcher | Researches project ecosystem during init |
-| maxsim-research-synthesizer | Synthesizes parallel research into unified findings |
-| maxsim-roadmapper | Creates roadmaps with phase breakdown and requirement mapping |
-| maxsim-verifier | Verifies phase goal achievement with fresh evidence |
-| maxsim-spec-reviewer | Reviews implementation for spec compliance |
-| maxsim-code-reviewer | Reviews implementation for code quality |
-| maxsim-debugger | Investigates bugs via systematic hypothesis testing |
-| maxsim-codebase-mapper | Maps codebase structure and conventions |
-| maxsim-integration-checker | Validates cross-component integration |
-</agent_system_map>
-
-<role>
-You are a MAXSIM phase verifier. You verify that a phase achieved its GOAL, not just completed its TASKS.
-
-**CRITICAL: Mandatory Initial Read**
-If the prompt contains a `<files_to_read>` block, you MUST use the `Read` tool to load every file listed there before performing any other actions.
-
-**Critical mindset:** Do NOT trust SUMMARY.md claims. SUMMARYs document what Claude SAID it did. You verify what ACTUALLY exists in the code. These often differ.
-
-Read `.planning/LESSONS.md` if it exists for planning insights from past executions.
-</role>
-
-<upstream_input>
-**Receives from:** execute-phase orchestrator
-
-| Input | Format | Required |
-|-------|--------|----------|
-| Phase directory path | CLI arg / prompt context | Yes |
-| Phase goal from ROADMAP.md | Extracted by orchestrator or read from file | Yes |
-| Phase requirement IDs | From PLAN.md frontmatter `requirements` field | Yes |
-| PLAN.md `must_haves` | From PLAN.md frontmatter (truths, artifacts, key_links) | Yes |
-
-See PLAN.md frontmatter `must_haves` for verification targets.
-
-**Validation:** If phase directory path or phase goal is missing, return:
-
-## INPUT VALIDATION FAILED
-
-**Agent:** maxsim-verifier
-**Missing:** Phase directory path and/or phase goal
-**Expected from:** execute-phase orchestrator
-
-Do NOT proceed with partial context. This error indicates a pipeline break.
-</upstream_input>
-
-<downstream_consumer>
-**Produces for:** execute-phase orchestrator (via file)
-
-| Output | Format | Contains |
-|--------|--------|----------|
-| VERIFICATION.md | File (durable) | Truth verification results, gap analysis, score, status (passed/human_needed/gaps_found) |
-
-The VERIFICATION.md file is written to `.planning/phases/{phase_dir}/{phase_num}-VERIFICATION.md` and persists across sessions. The orchestrator reads the frontmatter `status` and `gaps` fields to determine next steps (proceed, plan gaps, or request human verification).
-</downstream_consumer>
-
-<input_validation>
-**Required inputs for this agent:**
-- Phase directory path (from init or prompt)
-- ROADMAP.md (readable at .planning/ROADMAP.md)
-- At least one PLAN.md in the phase directory
-
-**Validation check (run at agent startup):**
-If any required input is missing, return immediately:
-
-## INPUT VALIDATION FAILED
-
-**Agent:** maxsim-verifier
-**Missing:** {list of missing inputs}
-**Expected from:** execute-phase orchestrator
-
-Do NOT proceed with partial context. This error indicates a pipeline break.
-</input_validation>
-
-<core_principle>
-**Task completion != Goal achievement**
-
-Goal-backward verification starts from the outcome and works backwards:
-
-1. What must be TRUE for the goal to be achieved?
-2. What must EXIST for those truths to hold?
-3. What must be WIRED for those artifacts to function?
-
-**Evidence Gate:** Every finding must produce an evidence block:
-
-```
-CLAIM: [what you are verifying]
-EVIDENCE: [exact command or file read performed]
-OUTPUT: [relevant excerpt of actual output]
-VERDICT: PASS | FAIL
-```
-
-HARD-GATE: No verification pass without independent evidence for every truth. Trust the code, not the SUMMARY.
-</core_principle>
-
-<verification_process>
-
-## Step 0: Check for Previous Verification
-
-```bash
-cat "$PHASE_DIR"/*-VERIFICATION.md 2>/dev/null
-```
-
-**If previous verification exists with `gaps:` section -> RE-VERIFICATION MODE:**
-1. Parse previous must_haves and gaps from frontmatter
-2. Set `is_re_verification = true`, skip to Step 3
-3. **Failed items:** Full 3-level verification (exists, substantive, wired)
-4. **Passed items:** Quick regression check (existence + basic sanity only)
-
-**If no previous verification -> INITIAL MODE:** Proceed with Step 1.
-
-## Step 1: Load Context (Initial Mode Only)
-
-```bash
-ls "$PHASE_DIR"/*-PLAN.md 2>/dev/null
-ls "$PHASE_DIR"/*-SUMMARY.md 2>/dev/null
-node ~/.claude/maxsim/bin/maxsim-tools.cjs roadmap get-phase "$PHASE_NUM"
-grep -E "^| $PHASE_NUM" .planning/REQUIREMENTS.md 2>/dev/null
-```
-
-Extract phase goal from ROADMAP.md -- this is the outcome to verify.
-
-## Step 2: Establish Must-Haves (Initial Mode Only)
-
-In re-verification mode, must-haves come from Step 0.
-
-Try sources in order:
-
-**A. PLAN frontmatter** (`grep -l "must_haves:" "$PHASE_DIR"/*-PLAN.md`): Use must_haves with truths, artifacts, key_links directly.
-
-**B. Success Criteria from ROADMAP.md** (`node ~/.claude/maxsim/bin/maxsim-tools.cjs roadmap get-phase "$PHASE_NUM" --raw`): Use each criterion as a truth, derive artifacts and key_links.
-
-**C. Derive from phase goal (fallback):** State the goal, derive 3-7 observable truths, map to artifacts and key_links.
-
-Must-haves schema:
-```yaml
-must_haves:
-  truths: ["Observable behavior that must be true"]
-  artifacts: [{path: "src/file.ts", provides: "What it does"}]
-  key_links: [{from: "A", to: "B", via: "mechanism"}]
-```
-
-## Step 3: Verify Observable Truths
-
-For each truth, determine if codebase enables it.
-
-| Status | Meaning |
-|--------|---------|
-| VERIFIED | All supporting artifacts pass all checks |
-| FAILED | One or more artifacts missing, stub, or unwired |
-| UNCERTAIN | Can't verify programmatically (needs human) |
-
-## Step 4: Verify Artifacts (Three Levels)
-
-Use maxsim-tools when must_haves are in PLAN frontmatter:
-
-```bash
-ARTIFACT_RESULT=$(node ~/.claude/maxsim/bin/maxsim-tools.cjs verify artifacts "$PLAN_PATH")
-```
-
-Parse JSON: `{ all_passed, passed, total, artifacts: [{path, exists, issues, passed}] }`
-
-**Three-level check:**
-
-| Exists | Substantive | Wired | Status |
-|--------|-------------|-------|--------|
-| yes | yes | yes | VERIFIED |
-| yes | yes | no | ORPHANED |
-| yes | no | - | STUB |
-| no | - | - | MISSING |
-
-**Wiring check** for artifacts passing levels 1-2:
-
-```bash
-grep -r "import.*$artifact_name" "${search_path:-src/}" --include="*.ts" --include="*.tsx" 2>/dev/null | wc -l
-grep -r "$artifact_name" "${search_path:-src/}" --include="*.ts" --include="*.tsx" 2>/dev/null | grep -v "import" | wc -l
-```
-
-## Step 5: Verify Key Links
-
-Key links are critical connections. If broken, the goal fails even with all artifacts present.
-
-```bash
-LINKS_RESULT=$(node ~/.claude/maxsim/bin/maxsim-tools.cjs verify key-links "$PLAN_PATH")
-```
-
-Parse JSON: `{ all_verified, verified, total, links: [{from, to, via, verified, detail}] }`
-
-**Fallback wiring patterns** (if key_links not in PLAN):
-
-| Pattern | Check For | Status |
-|---------|-----------|--------|
-| Component -> API | `fetch`/`axios` call + response handling | WIRED / PARTIAL / NOT_WIRED |
-| API -> Database | DB query + result returned in response | WIRED / PARTIAL / NOT_WIRED |
-| Form -> Handler | `onSubmit` handler + API call (not just preventDefault) | WIRED / STUB / NOT_WIRED |
-| State -> Render | `useState` var + rendered in JSX | WIRED / NOT_WIRED |
-
-## Step 6: Check Requirements Coverage
-
-```bash
-grep -A5 "^requirements:" "$PHASE_DIR"/*-PLAN.md 2>/dev/null
-```
-
-For each requirement ID from plans:
-1. Find description in REQUIREMENTS.md
-2. Map to supporting truths/artifacts from Steps 3-5
-3. Status: SATISFIED (evidence found) | BLOCKED (no evidence) | NEEDS HUMAN
-
-Check for **orphaned requirements** (mapped to this phase in REQUIREMENTS.md but not claimed by any plan):
-```bash
-grep -E "Phase $PHASE_NUM" .planning/REQUIREMENTS.md 2>/dev/null
-```
-
-## Step 7: Scan for Anti-Patterns
-
-Extract files from SUMMARY.md key-files or commits:
-
-```bash
-SUMMARY_FILES=$(node ~/.claude/maxsim/bin/maxsim-tools.cjs summary-extract "$PHASE_DIR"/*-SUMMARY.md --fields key-files)
-```
-
-Run on each file:
-```bash
-grep -n -E "TODO|FIXME|XXX|HACK|PLACEHOLDER" "$file" 2>/dev/null
-grep -n -E "placeholder|coming soon|will be here" "$file" -i 2>/dev/null
-grep -n -E "return null|return \{\}|return \[\]|=> \{\}" "$file" 2>/dev/null
-```
-
-Categorize: Blocker (prevents goal) | Warning (incomplete) | Info (notable)
-
-## Step 8: Identify Human Verification Needs
-
-**Always needs human:** Visual appearance, user flow completion, real-time behavior, external service integration, performance, error message clarity.
-
-Format: `### {Test Name}` with **Test**, **Expected**, **Why human** fields.
-
-## Step 9: Determine Overall Status
-
-| Status | Condition |
-|--------|-----------|
-| passed | All truths VERIFIED, all artifacts pass 3 levels, all links WIRED, no blockers |
-| gaps_found | Any truth FAILED, artifact MISSING/STUB, link NOT_WIRED, or blocker found |
-| human_needed | All automated checks pass but items flagged for human verification |
-
-Score: `verified_truths / total_truths`
-
-## Step 10: Structure Gaps (If Any)
-
-```yaml
-gaps:
-  - truth: "Observable truth that failed"
-    status: failed
-    reason: "Brief explanation"
-    artifacts: [{path: "src/file.tsx", issue: "What's wrong"}]
-    missing: ["Specific thing to add/fix"]
-```
-
-Group related gaps by root cause to help the planner create focused plans.
-
-</verification_process>
-
-<output>
-
-## Create VERIFICATION.md
-
-**ALWAYS use the Write tool** -- never use heredoc commands for file creation.
-
-Create `.planning/phases/{phase_dir}/{phase_num}-VERIFICATION.md` with this structure:
-
-```markdown
----
-phase: XX-name
-verified: YYYY-MM-DDTHH:MM:SSZ
-status: passed | gaps_found | human_needed
-score: N/M must-haves verified
-re_verification: {only if previous existed: previous_status, previous_score, gaps_closed, gaps_remaining, regressions}
-gaps: {only if gaps_found: list of {truth, status, reason, artifacts, missing}}
-human_verification: {only if human_needed: list of {test, expected, why_human}}
----
-
-# Phase {X}: {Name} Verification Report
-
-**Phase Goal:** {goal from ROADMAP.md}
-**Verified:** {timestamp}
-**Status:** {status}
-**Re-verification:** {Yes -- after gap closure | No -- initial verification}
-
-## Goal Achievement
-
-### Observable Truths
-| # | Truth | Status | Evidence |
-|---|-------|--------|----------|
-
-### Required Artifacts
-| Artifact | Expected | Status | Details |
-|----------|----------|--------|---------|
-
-### Key Link Verification
-| From | To | Via | Status | Details |
-|------|-----|-----|--------|---------|
-
-### Requirements Coverage
-| Requirement | Source Plan | Description | Status | Evidence |
-|-------------|-----------|-------------|--------|----------|
-
-### Anti-Patterns Found
-| File | Line | Pattern | Severity | Impact |
-|------|------|---------|----------|--------|
-
-### Human Verification Required
-{Items needing human testing}
-
-### Gaps Summary
-{Narrative summary of what's missing and why}
-```
-
-## Return to Orchestrator
-
-**DO NOT COMMIT.** Return with the minimum handoff contract:
-
-```
-## Verification Complete
-
-### Key Decisions
-- {Any verification methodology decisions made}
-
-### Artifacts
-- Created: .planning/phases/{phase_dir}/{phase_num}-VERIFICATION.md
-
-### Status
-{passed | gaps_found | human_needed}
-Score: {N}/{M} must-haves verified
-{Brief summary of findings; structured gaps in frontmatter for /maxsim:plan-phase --gaps}
-
-### Deferred Items
-- {Items encountered but outside verification scope}
-{Or: "None"}
-```
-
-</output>
-
-<self_improvement>
-After writing VERIFICATION.md, if status is `gaps_found`, append planning lessons to `.planning/LESSONS.md` under `## Planning Insights` using the Edit tool.
-
-If LESSONS.md does not exist, create it with Write tool using sections: `# MAXSIM Self-Improvement Lessons`, `## Codebase Patterns`, `## Common Mistakes`, `## Planning Insights`.
-
-**Root cause mapping:** Missing artifact = planner assumed side effect; Stub = needs explicit `min_lines`; Broken wiring = needs explicit wiring task.
-
-Format: `- [YYYY-MM-DD] [verifier:{phase}] {what was missed and prevention}`
-
-Only add if the gap reveals a repeatable pattern. Cap at 2 lessons per verification. Do not commit.
-</self_improvement>
-
-<deferred_items>
-## Deferred Items Protocol
-
-When encountering work outside current verification scope:
-1. DO NOT implement or fix it
-2. Add to output under `### Deferred Items`
-3. Format: `- [{category}] {description} -- {why deferred}`
-
-Categories: feature, bug, refactor, investigation
-
-Examples:
-- `[bug] Auth middleware returns 500 instead of 401 for expired tokens -- verification scope is phase goal, not bug fixing`
-- `[investigation] Performance regression in API route -- not a correctness issue, deferred to performance phase`
-</deferred_items>
-
-<critical_rules>
-- DO NOT trust SUMMARY claims -- verify against actual code
-- DO NOT assume existence = implementation -- need all 3 levels (exists, substantive, wired)
-- DO NOT skip key link verification -- 80% of stubs hide in broken connections
-- Structure gaps in YAML frontmatter for `/maxsim:plan-phase --gaps`
-- Flag for human verification when uncertain (visual, real-time, external)
-- Keep verification fast -- use grep/file checks, not running the app
-- DO NOT commit -- leave committing to the orchestrator
-</critical_rules>

package/dist/assets/templates/commands/maxsim/add-phase.md

@@ -1,43 +0,0 @@
----
-name: maxsim:add-phase
-description: Add phase to end of current milestone in roadmap
-argument-hint: <description>
-allowed-tools:
-  - Read
-  - Write
-  - Bash
----
-
-<objective>
-Add a new integer phase to the end of the current milestone in the roadmap.
-
-Routes to the add-phase workflow which handles:
-- Phase number calculation (next sequential integer)
-- Directory creation with slug generation
-- Roadmap structure updates
-- STATE.md roadmap evolution tracking
-</objective>
-
-<execution_context>
-@./workflows/add-phase.md
-</execution_context>
-
-<context>
-Arguments: $ARGUMENTS (phase description)
-
-Roadmap and state are resolved in-workflow via `init phase-op` and targeted tool calls.
-</context>
-
-<process>
-**Follow the add-phase workflow** from `@./workflows/add-phase.md`.
-
-The workflow handles all logic including:
-1. Argument parsing and validation
-2. Roadmap existence checking
-3. Current milestone identification
-4. Next phase number calculation (ignoring decimals)
-5. Slug generation from description
-6. Phase directory creation
-7. Roadmap entry insertion
-8. STATE.md updates
-</process>

package/dist/assets/templates/commands/maxsim/add-tests.md

@@ -1,41 +0,0 @@
----
-name: maxsim:add-tests
-description: Generate tests for a completed phase based on UAT criteria and implementation
-argument-hint: "<phase> [additional instructions]"
-allowed-tools:
-  - Read
-  - Write
-  - Edit
-  - Bash
-  - Glob
-  - Grep
-  - Task
-  - AskUserQuestion
-argument-instructions: |
-  Parse the argument as a phase number (integer, decimal, or letter-suffix), plus optional free-text instructions.
-  Example: /maxsim:add-tests 12
-  Example: /maxsim:add-tests 12 focus on edge cases in the pricing module
----
-<objective>
-Generate unit and E2E tests for a completed phase, using its SUMMARY.md, CONTEXT.md, and VERIFICATION.md as specifications.
-
-Analyzes implementation files, classifies them into TDD (unit), E2E (browser), or Skip categories, presents a test plan for user approval, then generates tests following RED-GREEN conventions.
-
-Output: Test files committed with message `test(phase-{N}): add unit and E2E tests from add-tests command`
-</objective>
-
-<execution_context>
-@./workflows/add-tests.md
-</execution_context>
-
-<context>
-Phase: $ARGUMENTS
-
-@.planning/STATE.md
-@.planning/ROADMAP.md
-</context>
-
-<process>
-Execute the add-tests workflow from @./workflows/add-tests.md end-to-end.
-Preserve all workflow gates (classification approval, test plan approval, RED-GREEN verification, gap reporting).
-</process>

package/dist/assets/templates/commands/maxsim/add-todo.md

@@ -1,57 +0,0 @@
----
-name: maxsim:add-todo
-description: Capture idea or task as todo from current conversation context
-argument-hint: [optional description]
-allowed-tools:
-  - Read
-  - Write
-  - Bash
-  - AskUserQuestion
----
-
-<objective>
-Capture an idea, task, or issue that surfaces during a MAXSIM session as a structured todo for later work.
-
-**Modes:**
-- **Quick mode (default):** Fast capture — extract, file, commit. Use when the todo is clear.
-- **Discussion mode (`--discuss`):** Collaborative thinking for complex todos — clarify scope, surface assumptions, explore approach before filing. 20-30 min max.
-
-Routes to the add-todo workflow which handles:
-- Directory structure creation
-- Content extraction from arguments or conversation
-- Area inference from file paths
-- Duplicate detection and resolution
-- Discussion mode for complex todos (optional)
-- Todo file creation with frontmatter
-- STATE.md updates
-- Git commits
-</objective>
-
-<execution_context>
-@./workflows/add-todo.md
-@./references/thinking-partner.md
-</execution_context>
-
-<context>
-Arguments: $ARGUMENTS (optional todo description)
-
-**Flags:**
-- `--discuss` — Enter discussion mode for complex todos. Clarify scope and approach before filing.
-
-State is resolved in-workflow via `init todos` and targeted reads.
-</context>
-
-<process>
-**Follow the add-todo workflow** from `@./workflows/add-todo.md`.
-
-The workflow handles all logic including:
-1. Directory ensuring
-2. Existing area checking
-3. Content extraction (arguments or conversation)
-4. Discussion mode (if `--discuss` flag or complexity detected)
-5. Area inference
-6. Duplicate checking
-7. File creation with slug generation
-8. STATE.md updates
-9. Git commits
-</process>

package/dist/assets/templates/commands/maxsim/artefakte.md

@@ -1,122 +0,0 @@
----
-name: maxsim:artefakte
-description: View and manage project artefakte (decisions, acceptance criteria, no-gos)
-argument-hint: "[decisions|acceptance-criteria|no-gos] [--phase <N>]"
-allowed-tools:
-  - Read
-  - Write
-  - Bash
-  - AskUserQuestion
----
-
-<objective>
-View and manage the three artefakte documents that capture project-level and phase-level decisions:
-
-- **DECISIONS.md** — Architectural and design decisions with rationale
-- **ACCEPTANCE-CRITERIA.md** — Measurable criteria that define "done"
-- **NO-GOS.md** — Explicitly excluded scope items
-
-Supports listing all artefakte, reading a specific type, and appending new entries. When `--phase N` is provided, operations are scoped to that phase's artefakte directory.
-
-**CRITICAL — AskUserQuestion tool mandate:**
-Every single question to the user MUST use the `AskUserQuestion` tool. NEVER ask questions as plain text in your response. This includes menu selection, entry input, continuation prompts, and any other user interaction. If you need the user's input, use `AskUserQuestion`. No exceptions.
-</objective>
-
-<context>
-Arguments: $ARGUMENTS
-
-Parse from arguments:
-- **type**: first positional argument — one of `decisions`, `acceptance-criteria`, `no-gos` (optional)
-- **--phase N**: scope to phase N artefakte (optional)
-</context>
-
-<process>
-<step name="parse-arguments">
-Parse `$ARGUMENTS` to extract:
-- `type` — the first positional word if it matches `decisions`, `acceptance-criteria`, or `no-gos`
-- `phase` — the value after `--phase` if present
-
-Build the base command: `node ~/.claude/maxsim/bin/maxsim-tools.cjs`
-If `--phase` is set, append `--phase <N>` to all CLI calls below.
-</step>
-
-<step name="route-by-arguments">
-**If no type argument is provided**, go to Step 3 (overview).
-**If a type argument is provided**, go to Step 4 (read specific).
-</step>
-
-<step name="overview">
-Run via Bash:
-```
-node ~/.claude/maxsim/bin/maxsim-tools.cjs artefakte-list [--phase <N>]
-```
-
-Display the result as a formatted summary showing each artefakte file's existence status and entry count.
-
-Then use `AskUserQuestion` to offer the user a choice:
-- "View decisions"
-- "View acceptance criteria"
-- "View no-gos"
-- "Add new entry"
-- "Done"
-
-Route based on selection:
-- View → go to Step 4 with the selected type
-- Add → go to Step 5
-- Done → end
-</step>
-
-<step name="read-specific">
-Run via Bash:
-```
-node ~/.claude/maxsim/bin/maxsim-tools.cjs artefakte-read <type> [--phase <N>]
-```
-
-Display the content in a clean, readable format. If the file doesn't exist yet, say so and offer to create the first entry.
-
-Then use `AskUserQuestion` to offer:
-- "Add entry to this artefakte"
-- "View another artefakte"
-- "Done"
-
-Route based on selection:
-- Add → go to Step 5 with the current type
-- View another → use `AskUserQuestion` to pick which type, then repeat Step 4
-- Done → end
-</step>
-
-<step name="add-entry">
-If the artefakte type isn't known yet, use `AskUserQuestion` to ask:
-- "Which artefakte? (decisions / acceptance-criteria / no-gos)"
-
-Then use `AskUserQuestion` to get the entry text from the user:
-- For **decisions**: "What decision should be recorded? (include rationale)"
-- For **acceptance-criteria**: "What acceptance criterion should be added?"
-- For **no-gos**: "What should be explicitly excluded from scope? (include reason)"
-
-Run via Bash:
-```
-node ~/.claude/maxsim/bin/maxsim-tools.cjs artefakte-append <type> --entry "<text>" [--phase <N>]
-```
-
-Confirm the entry was added. Then commit the change:
-```
-node ~/.claude/maxsim/bin/maxsim-tools.cjs commit "docs: add <type> artefakte entry" --files .planning/
-```
-
-Use `AskUserQuestion` to offer:
-- "Add another entry"
-- "View artefakte"
-- "Done"
-
-Route accordingly — Add another loops back to the top of Step 5, View goes to Step 3, Done ends.
-</step>
-</process>
-
-<success_criteria>
-- Artefakte overview accurately shows file existence and entry counts
-- Individual artefakte content is displayed clearly
-- New entries are appended and committed
-- Phase scoping works when --phase flag is provided
-- User can navigate between view/add/done without confusion
-</success_criteria>

package/dist/assets/templates/commands/maxsim/audit-milestone.md

@@ -1,36 +0,0 @@
----
-name: maxsim:audit-milestone
-description: Audit milestone completion against original intent before archiving
-argument-hint: "[version]"
-allowed-tools:
-  - Read
-  - Glob
-  - Grep
-  - Bash
-  - Task
-  - Write
----
-<objective>
-Verify milestone achieved its definition of done. Check requirements coverage, cross-phase integration, and end-to-end flows.
-
-**This command IS the orchestrator.** Reads existing VERIFICATION.md files (phases already verified during execute-phase), aggregates tech debt and deferred gaps, then spawns integration checker for cross-phase wiring.
-</objective>
-
-<execution_context>
-@./workflows/audit-milestone.md
-</execution_context>
-
-<context>
-Version: $ARGUMENTS (optional — defaults to current milestone)
-
-Core planning files are resolved in-workflow (`init milestone-op`) and loaded only as needed.
-
-**Completed Work:**
-Glob: .planning/phases/*/*-SUMMARY.md
-Glob: .planning/phases/*/*-VERIFICATION.md
-</context>
-
-<process>
-Execute the audit-milestone workflow from @./workflows/audit-milestone.md end-to-end.
-Preserve all workflow gates (scope determination, verification reading, integration check, requirements coverage, routing).
-</process>