maestro-flow 0.5.2 → 0.5.31

package/workflows/review.md

@@ -1,486 +1,446 @@
-# Review Workflow
-
-Tiered multi-dimensional code review with parallel agents, severity classification, and iterative deep-dive.
-
----
-
-## Spec Compliance Pre-Check (Phase 0)
-
-**Before any dimensional code quality review**, verify the implementation matches its spec:
-
-1. Load `convergence.criteria[]` from each `.task/TASK-{NNN}.json` in the phase
-2. For each criterion, check if the code implements it (grep for functions, endpoints, components named in the criterion)
-3. Classify each: **MET** (evidence found) | **UNMET** (not implemented) | **PARTIAL** (incomplete)
-
-| Result | Action |
-|--------|--------|
-| All MET | Proceed to Step 1 (dimensional review) |
-| Any UNMET | Report as spec_compliance_failures, add to findings with severity=critical, dimension="spec-compliance" |
-| Any PARTIAL | Report with severity=high |
-
-This prevents code that is well-written but doesn't meet requirements from passing review.
-
----
-
-## Receiving Review Feedback
-
-When external review feedback is received (from human reviewers, PR comments, or other agents):
-
-1. **Verify before implementing** — Check each suggestion against codebase reality. Reviewer may lack full context.
-2. **Technical acknowledgment only** — No performative agreement ("You're absolutely right!", "Great point!"). Just state the fix or provide technical reasoning.
-3. **Push back when wrong** — If a suggestion would break existing functionality, violate architecture constraints, or is technically incorrect for this codebase, explain why with evidence.
-4. **YAGNI check** — If reviewer suggests adding a feature/abstraction, verify it's actually needed. Unused features should be questioned.
-5. **Implement one at a time** — Fix one item, test, then move to next. Never batch-implement all feedback at once.
-6. **Priority order** — Blocking issues (breaks, security) → Simple fixes (typos, imports) → Complex fixes (refactoring, logic).
-
----
-
-## Prerequisites
-
-- Phase execution completed (task summaries exist)
-- Recommended: maestro-execute verification gate already run (review uses verification gaps as context)
-
----
-
-## Phase Resolution
-
-```
-Input: <phase> argument (number or slug)
-
-Resolve phase from .workflow/state.json artifacts (type=execute, match by phase number or slug)
-→ PHASE_DIR = ".workflow/" + artifact.path
-→ Error if not found or no completed tasks
-```
-
----
-
-## Flag Processing
-
-| Flag | Effect |
-|------|--------|
-| `--level quick\|standard\|deep` | Explicit review level (default: auto-detect) |
-| `--dimensions <list>` | Comma-separated subset (overrides level defaults) |
-| `--skip-specs` | Skip loading project specs |
-
----
-
-## Review Levels
-
-Three tiers that scale with task depth:
-
-| Aspect | Quick | Standard | Deep |
-|--------|-------|----------|------|
-| **Trigger** | `--level quick`, or auto ≤3 files | Default, or auto 4-19 files | `--level deep`, or auto ≥20 files / critical phase |
-| **Dimensions** | correctness, security | All 6 | All 6 |
-| **Execution** | Inline (no agents) | Parallel agents | Parallel agents |
-| **Deep-Dive** | None | Auto (if critical > 0) | Forced, max 3 iterations |
-| **Issue Creation** | Critical only | Critical + High | Critical + High + Medium |
-| **Cross-File Analysis** | None | Critical files (3+ dims) | Full impact radius |
-
----
-
-## Step 1: Collect Changed Files
-
-**Purpose:** Build the file list to review from phase execution artifacts.
-
-### 1a: Extract from task summaries
-
-```
-Collect changed_files from PHASE_DIR:
-  - .summaries/TASK-{NNN}-summary.md → extract referenced file paths (created/modified/deleted)
-  - .task/TASK-{NNN}.json → extract files[].path where action is create|modify
-Deduplicate result
-```
-
-### 1b: Validate files exist
-
-```
-review_files = changed_files filtered to: exists on disk AND not in excluded patterns
-
-Excluded patterns:
-  - node_modules/**, vendor/**, dist/**, build/**
-  - *.lock, *.min.js, *.min.css
-  - .workflow/**, .claude/**
-```
-
-### 1c: Error if empty
-
-```
-Abort E004 if review_files is empty
-```
-
----
-
-## Step 2: Determine Review Level
-
-```
-level = --level flag value, or auto-detect:
-  ≤3 files → quick | ≥20 files or critical phase → deep | otherwise → standard
-
-Log: "Review level: {level} ({file_count} files)"
-```
-
-### Determine dimensions
-
-```
-dimensions = --dimensions flag (comma-separated), or level defaults:
-  quick → [correctness, security]
-  standard|deep → [correctness, security, performance, architecture, maintainability, best-practices]
-```
-
----
-
-## Step 3: Load Project Specs
-
-**Skip if `--skip-specs` flag is set.**
-
-```
-specs_content = maestro spec load --category review
-```
-
-Pass specs_content to reviewer agents as quality standards context.
-
----
-
-## Step 4: Load Review Context
-
-Build context object for reviewer agents:
-
-```
-review_context = {
-  phase_goal: index.json.goal || index.json.description,
-  success_criteria: index.json.success_criteria,
-  tech_stack: detect from package.json / pyproject.toml / go.mod / Cargo.toml,
-  specs: specs_content (from Step 3),
-  verification_gaps: load from ${PHASE_DIR}/verification.json .gaps if exists, else []
-}
-```
-
----
-
-## Step 5: Execute Review
-
-**Execution strategy depends on review level.**
-
-### Quick Level — Inline Scan
-
-No agents spawned. The orchestrator performs the review directly.
-
-```
-Scan each review_file against each dimension, collecting findings:
-
-  correctness: unhandled null/undefined, missing error propagation, type mismatches,
-               off-by-one, missing boundary checks, unreachable code, logic contradictions
-  security:    SQL/command injection, hardcoded secrets/keys/passwords,
-               missing input validation, XSS vectors
-
-Each finding: { id: "{PREFIX}-{NNN}", dimension, severity, title, file, line, snippet,
-               description, impact, suggestion }
-```
-
-**After inline scan, skip to Step 6 (Aggregate).**
-
-### Standard Level — Parallel Agent Review
-
-Spawn one workflow-reviewer agent per dimension, all in parallel:
-
-```
-Per dimension → spawn workflow-reviewer agent (all parallel):
-  Context: dimension, phase_name, phase_goal, review_files, success_criteria,
-           tech_stack, specs_content, verification_gaps
-  Instructions:
-    - Read each file, analyze for {dimension}-specific issues only
-    - Classify: critical / high / medium / low
-    - Return JSON array: id, dimension, severity, title, file, line, snippet,
-      description, impact, suggestion, spec_violation (if applicable)
-    - Top 20 findings by severity, each with file:line evidence
-```
-
-**Launch ALL dimension agents in a single message** (parallel execution).
-
-Collect dimension_results from each agent (JSON findings array). Log W001 on agent failure, continue with partial results.
-
-### Deep Level — Enhanced Agent Review
-
-Same parallel agent spawning as standard, but with enhanced prompt:
-
-```
-Same parallel agent spawning as standard, with deep-mode enhancements:
-  - Also read direct imports for context
-  - Trace callers/dependents for critical/high findings
-  - Cross-reference patterns across files (duplication, inconsistency)
-  - Return includes additional field: related_files[]
-  - Top 30 findings (vs 20 for standard)
-```
-
-Collect results same as standard.
-
----
-
-## Step 6: Aggregate Findings
-
-### 6a: Merge all findings
-
-```
-all_findings = merge all dimension results, sorted by severity (critical > high > medium > low), then dimension
-```
-
-### 6b: Severity distribution
-
-```
-severity_dist = count all_findings by severity {critical, high, medium, low}
-```
-
-### 6c: Identify critical files (standard + deep only)
-
-```
-IF level != "quick":
-  critical_files = files with critical/high findings across 3+ distinct dimensions
-  → [{ file, dimensions[] }]
-```
-
-### 6d: Determine verdict
-
-```
-verdict:
-  BLOCK → any critical, or >5 high
-  WARN  → any high (≤5)
-  PASS  → no critical or high
-```
-
----
-
-## Step 6.5: CLI Supplementary Analysis (standard + deep only)
-
-**Skip for quick level or if no enabled CLI tools.**
-
-**Purpose:** Use external CLI tool as a second opinion on critical findings before deep-dive. The CLI analysis supplements (not replaces) the agent review — its results are merged into findings.
-
-```
-IF level == "quick" OR no CLI tools enabled: skip to Step 7
-
-# Gather critical/high findings for CLI cross-check
-cli_targets = all_findings.filter(f => f.severity in ["critical", "high"])
-IF cli_targets.length == 0: skip to Step 7
-
-# Build concise review prompt from findings
-finding_summary = cli_targets.map(f => "${f.id}: [${f.severity}] ${f.file}:${f.line} — ${f.title}").join("\n")
-
-Bash({
-  command: 'maestro delegate "PURPOSE: Cross-verify code review findings and identify missed issues
-TASK: For each finding, verify severity is accurate | Check for false positives | Identify any critical issues missed by initial review in the same files
-MODE: analysis
-CONTEXT: @${review_files as glob pattern}
-EXPECTED: JSON array of { finding_id, verified: bool, adjusted_severity?, missed_issues?: [{ severity, file, line, title, description }] }
-CONSTRAINTS: Only report missed issues of severity high or above | Do not duplicate existing findings
-
-Existing findings to verify:
-${finding_summary}
-" --role review --mode analysis',
-  run_in_background: true
-})
-```
-
-**On callback:**
-```
-cli_result = maestro delegate output <id>
-Parse JSON from cli_result
-
-For each verified finding:
-  If adjusted_severity differs: update finding.severity, add finding.cli_note = "severity adjusted by CLI review"
-For each missed_issue:
-  Append to all_findings with id: "CLI-{NNN}", source: "cli-supplementary"
-
-Recalculate severity_dist after merge
-```
-
----
-
-## Step 7: Deep-Dive (Conditional)
-
-**Skip entirely for quick level.**
-
-**Trigger conditions:**
-- **Standard**: `severity_dist.critical > 0` (auto-trigger)
-- **Deep**: Always triggered (forced)
-
-**Skip if level == "standard" AND severity_dist.critical == 0.**
-
-### 7a: Select deep-dive targets
-
-```
-deep_dive_targets:
-  deep  → critical + high findings, top 15
-  standard → critical findings only, top 10
-```
-
-### 7b: Deep-dive iteration
-
-```
-Iterate up to max_iterations (deep=3, standard=1) over unresolved targets:
-
-  Per target → spawn workflow-reviewer agent:
-    Context: original finding JSON, previous analysis (if iteration > 1)
-    Tasks: read affected file, find callers/imports, check test coverage
-    Analyze: root cause, impact radius, remediation (with code example), risk if unfixed
-
-    Return JSON:
-    {
-      "finding_id": "{target.id}",
-      "root_cause": "...",
-      "impact_radius": ["file1.ts", "file2.ts"],
-      "remediation": { "approach": "...", "code_example": "..." },
-      "risk_if_unfixed": "...",
-      "reassessed_severity": "critical|high|medium|low",
-      "confidence": 0.0-1.0
-    }
-
-  Merge: enrich original finding, mark complete if confidence >= 0.8,
-         update severity if reassessed. Stop early if all resolved.
-```
-
----
-
-## Step 8: Auto-Create Issues
-
-**Issue creation thresholds by level:**
-
-| Level | Severities that create issues |
-|-------|-------------------------------|
-| Quick | Critical only |
-| Standard | Critical + High |
-| Deep | Critical + High + Medium |
-
-```
-Filter findings by level threshold (quick=critical, standard=critical+high, deep=+medium)
-
-For each qualifying finding → append issue to .workflow/issues/issues.jsonl:
-  id: "ISS-{YYYYMMDD}-{NNN}" (auto-increment from existing today's entries)
-  title: "[{dimension}] {title}" (max 100 chars)
-  status: "registered"
-  priority: severity_to_priority (critical→1, high→2, medium→3)
-  severity, source: "review", phase_ref, gap_ref: finding.id
-  description, fix_direction: finding.suggestion
-  context: { location: "{file}:{line}", suggested_fix, notes: impact }
-  tags: ["review", dimension]
-  Timestamps: created_at, updated_at = now()
-
-Link finding.issue_id back to created issue
-```
-
-**severity_to_priority mapping**: critical → 1, high → 2, medium → 3
-
----
-
-## Step 9: Write review.json
-
-**Archive previous review artifacts** before writing:
-```
-Archive existing review.json → ${PHASE_DIR}/.history/review-{YYYY-MM-DDTHH-mm-ss}.json
-```
-
-```
-Write ${PHASE_DIR}/review.json:
-{
-  "phase": PHASE_NUM,
-  "level": "quick" | "standard" | "deep",
-  "verdict": "PASS" | "WARN" | "BLOCK",
-  "reviewed_at": now(),
-  "reviewer": "workflow-reviewer",
-  "dimensions_reviewed": dimensions,
-  "files_reviewed": review_files,
-  "severity_distribution": {
-    "critical": N,
-    "high": N,
-    "medium": N,
-    "low": N,
-    "total": N
-  },
-  "critical_files": critical_files,
-  "findings": all_findings,
-  "deep_dives": deep_dive_results (if any),
-  "issues_created": issue_ids[]
-}
-```
-
----
-
-## Step 10: Update index.json
-
-```
-Update index.json.updated_at = now()
-Set index.json.review = { level, verdict, reviewed_at, severity_distribution,
-                          findings_count, issues_created count }
-```
-
----
-
-## Report Format
-
-```
-=== CODE REVIEW RESULTS ===
-Phase:     {phase_name}
-Level:     {quick | standard | deep}
-Files:     {files_reviewed.length} files across {dimensions.length} dimensions
-Duration:  {duration}
-
-Severity Distribution:
-  Critical: {critical}
-  High:     {high}
-  Medium:   {medium}
-  Low:      {low}
-
-Top Issues:
-  1. [{severity}] {finding_id}: {title} ({file}:{line})
-  2. [{severity}] {finding_id}: {title} ({file}:{line})
-  3. [{severity}] {finding_id}: {title} ({file}:{line})
-  ... (up to 10)
-
-{IF level != "quick":
-Critical Files (3+ dimensions flagged):
-  - {file} ({dimension1}, {dimension2}, {dimension3})
-}
-
-Verdict: {PASS | WARN | BLOCK}
-Issues Created: {count}
-
-Files:
-  {artifact_dir}/review.json
-
-Next steps:
-  {suggested_next_command}
-```
-
----
-
-## Next Step Routing
-
-| Verdict | Suggestion |
-|---------|------------|
-| PASS | Skill({ skill: "quality-test", args: "{phase}" }) for UAT, or Skill({ skill: "maestro-milestone-audit" }) if UAT already passed |
-| WARN | Review findings, then Skill({ skill: "quality-test", args: "{phase}" }) — acknowledge warnings before proceeding |
-| BLOCK (≤3 findings, all medium/low) | **Lightweight fix loop**: fix inline → re-run review on affected files only → repeat until PASS/WARN (max 2 iterations) |
-| BLOCK (>3 findings or any critical) | Full fix cycle: Skill({ skill: "maestro-plan", args: "{phase} --gaps" }) -> Skill({ skill: "maestro-execute", args: "{phase}" }) -> re-run Skill({ skill: "quality-review", args: "{phase}" }) |
-
----
-
-## Error Handling
-
-| Error | Action |
-|-------|--------|
-| Phase directory not found | Abort: "Phase {phase} not found." |
-| No execution results | Abort: "No completed tasks found. Run maestro-execute first." |
-| No changed files | Abort: "No changed files detected in this phase." |
-| Reviewer agent fails | Log W001, continue with available dimension results |
-| All agents fail | Abort: "Review could not complete — all dimension agents failed." |
-| Deep-dive agent fails | Log finding as unresolved, skip enrichment |
-
----
-
-## State Updates
-
-| When | Field | Value |
-|------|-------|-------|
-| Step 5 start | index.json.status | "reviewing" (if currently "verifying") |
-| Step 10 | index.json.review | Review results summary |
-| Step 10 | index.json.updated_at | Current timestamp |
+# Review Workflow
+
+Tiered multi-dimensional code review with parallel agents, severity classification, and iterative deep-dive.
+
+---
+
+## Spec Compliance Pre-Check (Phase 0)
+
+1. Load `convergence.criteria[]` from each `.task/TASK-{NNN}.json`
+2. For each criterion, grep for functions/endpoints/components named in the criterion
+3. Classify: **MET** (evidence found) | **UNMET** (not implemented) | **PARTIAL** (incomplete)
+
+| Result | Action |
+|--------|--------|
+| All MET | Proceed to Step 1 (dimensional review) |
+| Any UNMET | Report as spec_compliance_failures, add to findings with severity=critical, dimension="spec-compliance" |
+| Any PARTIAL | Report with severity=high |
+
+---
+
+## Receiving Review Feedback
+
+1. **Verify before implementing** — Check each suggestion against codebase reality.
+2. **Technical acknowledgment only** — No performative agreement. State the fix or provide technical reasoning.
+3. **Push back when wrong** — If a suggestion would break functionality or violate constraints, explain why with evidence.
+4. **YAGNI check** — Verify suggested features/abstractions are actually needed.
+5. **Implement one at a time** — Fix one item, test, then next. NEVER batch-implement all feedback.
+6. **Priority order** — Blocking (breaks, security) → Simple (typos, imports) → Complex (refactoring, logic).
+
+---
+
+## Phase Resolution
+
+```
+Input: <phase> argument (number or slug)
+
+Resolve phase from .workflow/state.json artifacts (type=execute, match by phase number or slug)
+→ PHASE_DIR = ".workflow/" + artifact.path
+→ Error if not found or no completed tasks
+```
+
+---
+
+## Flag Processing
+
+| Flag | Effect |
+|------|--------|
+| `--level quick\|standard\|deep` | Explicit review level (default: auto-detect) |
+| `--dimensions <list>` | Comma-separated subset (overrides level defaults) |
+| `--skip-specs` | Skip loading project specs |
+
+---
+
+## Review Levels
+
+| Aspect | Quick | Standard | Deep |
+|--------|-------|----------|------|
+| **Trigger** | `--level quick`, or auto ≤3 files | Default, or auto 4-19 files | `--level deep`, or auto ≥20 files / critical phase |
+| **Dimensions** | correctness, security | All 6 | All 6 |
+| **Execution** | Inline (no agents) | Parallel agents | Parallel agents |
+| **Deep-Dive** | None | Auto (if critical > 0) | Forced, max 3 iterations |
+| **Issue Creation** | Critical only | Critical + High | Critical + High + Medium |
+| **Cross-File Analysis** | None | Critical files (3+ dims) | Full impact radius |
+
+---
+
+## Step 1: Collect Changed Files
+
+### 1a: Extract from task summaries
+
+```
+Collect changed_files from PHASE_DIR:
+  - .summaries/TASK-{NNN}-summary.md → extract referenced file paths (created/modified/deleted)
+  - .task/TASK-{NNN}.json → extract files[].path where action is create|modify
+Deduplicate result
+```
+
+### 1b: Validate files exist
+
+```
+review_files = changed_files filtered to: exists on disk AND not in excluded patterns
+
+Excluded patterns:
+  - node_modules/**, vendor/**, dist/**, build/**
+  - *.lock, *.min.js, *.min.css
+  - .workflow/**, .claude/**
+```
+
+### 1c: Error if empty
+
+```
+Abort E004 if review_files is empty
+```
+
+---
+
+## Step 2: Determine Review Level
+
+```
+level = --level flag value, or auto-detect:
+  ≤3 files → quick | ≥20 files or critical phase → deep | otherwise → standard
+
+Log: "Review level: {level} ({file_count} files)"
+```
+
+### Determine dimensions
+
+```
+dimensions = --dimensions flag (comma-separated), or level defaults:
+  quick → [correctness, security]
+  standard|deep → [correctness, security, performance, architecture, maintainability, best-practices]
+```
+
+---
+
+## Step 3: Load Project Specs
+
+**Skip if `--skip-specs`.**
+
+```
+specs_content = maestro spec load --category review
+→ Pass to reviewer agents as quality standards context
+```
+
+---
+
+## Step 4: Load Review Context
+
+Build context object for reviewer agents:
+
+```
+review_context = {
+  phase_goal: index.json.goal || index.json.description,
+  success_criteria: index.json.success_criteria,
+  tech_stack: detect from package.json / pyproject.toml / go.mod / Cargo.toml,
+  specs: specs_content (from Step 3),
+  verification_gaps: load from ${PHASE_DIR}/verification.json .gaps if exists, else []
+}
+```
+
+---
+
+## Step 5: Execute Review
+
+### Quick Level — Inline Scan
+
+```
+Scan each review_file against each dimension, collecting findings:
+
+  correctness: unhandled null/undefined, missing error propagation, type mismatches,
+               off-by-one, missing boundary checks, unreachable code, logic contradictions
+  security:    SQL/command injection, hardcoded secrets/keys/passwords,
+               missing input validation, XSS vectors
+
+Each finding: { id: "{PREFIX}-{NNN}", dimension, severity, title, file, line, snippet,
+               description, impact, suggestion }
+```
+
+**After inline scan, skip to Step 6.**
+
+### Standard Level — Parallel Agent Review
+
+```
+Per dimension → spawn workflow-reviewer agent (all parallel):
+  Context: dimension, phase_name, phase_goal, review_files, success_criteria,
+           tech_stack, specs_content, verification_gaps
+  Instructions:
+    - Read each file, analyze for {dimension}-specific issues only
+    - Classify: critical / high / medium / low
+    - Return JSON array: id, dimension, severity, title, file, line, snippet,
+      description, impact, suggestion, spec_violation (if applicable)
+    - Top 20 findings by severity, each with file:line evidence
+```
+
+Launch ALL dimension agents in a single message. Collect dimension_results (JSON findings array). Log W001 on agent failure, continue with partial results.
+
+### Deep Level — Enhanced Agent Review
+
+```
+Same as standard, with deep-mode enhancements:
+  - Also read direct imports for context
+  - Trace callers/dependents for critical/high findings
+  - Cross-reference patterns across files (duplication, inconsistency)
+  - Return includes additional field: related_files[]
+  - Top 30 findings (vs 20 for standard)
+```
+
+---
+
+## Step 6: Aggregate Findings
+
+### 6a: Merge all findings
+
+```
+all_findings = merge all dimension results, sorted by severity (critical > high > medium > low), then dimension
+```
+
+### 6b: Severity distribution
+
+```
+severity_dist = count all_findings by severity {critical, high, medium, low}
+```
+
+### 6c: Identify critical files (standard + deep only)
+
+```
+IF level != "quick":
+  critical_files = files with critical/high findings across 3+ distinct dimensions
+  → [{ file, dimensions[] }]
+```
+
+### 6d: Determine verdict
+
+```
+verdict:
+  BLOCK → any critical, or >5 high
+  WARN  → any high (≤5)
+  PASS  → no critical or high
+```
+
+---
+
+## Step 6.5: CLI Supplementary Analysis (standard + deep only)
+
+**Skip for quick level or if no enabled CLI tools.**
+
+```
+IF level == "quick" OR no CLI tools enabled: skip to Step 7
+
+# Gather critical/high findings for CLI cross-check
+cli_targets = all_findings.filter(f => f.severity in ["critical", "high"])
+IF cli_targets.length == 0: skip to Step 7
+
+# Build concise review prompt from findings
+finding_summary = cli_targets.map(f => "${f.id}: [${f.severity}] ${f.file}:${f.line} — ${f.title}").join("\n")
+
+Bash({
+  command: 'maestro delegate "PURPOSE: Cross-verify code review findings and identify missed issues
+TASK: For each finding, verify severity is accurate | Check for false positives | Identify any critical issues missed by initial review in the same files
+MODE: analysis
+CONTEXT: @${review_files as glob pattern}
+EXPECTED: JSON array of { finding_id, verified: bool, adjusted_severity?, missed_issues?: [{ severity, file, line, title, description }] }
+CONSTRAINTS: Only report missed issues of severity high or above | Do not duplicate existing findings
+
+Existing findings to verify:
+${finding_summary}
+" --role review --mode analysis',
+  run_in_background: true
+})
+```
+
+**On callback:**
+```
+cli_result = maestro delegate output <id>
+Parse JSON from cli_result
+
+For each verified finding:
+  If adjusted_severity differs: update finding.severity, add finding.cli_note = "severity adjusted by CLI review"
+For each missed_issue:
+  Append to all_findings with id: "CLI-{NNN}", source: "cli-supplementary"
+
+Recalculate severity_dist after merge
+```
+
+---
+
+## Step 7: Deep-Dive (Conditional)
+
+**Skip for quick level.**
+
+| Level | Trigger |
+|-------|---------|
+| Standard | `severity_dist.critical > 0` |
+| Deep | Always |
+
+### 7a: Select deep-dive targets
+
+```
+deep_dive_targets:
+  deep  → critical + high findings, top 15
+  standard → critical findings only, top 10
+```
+
+### 7b: Deep-dive iteration
+
+```
+Iterate up to max_iterations (deep=3, standard=1) over unresolved targets:
+
+  Per target → spawn workflow-reviewer agent:
+    Context: original finding JSON, previous analysis (if iteration > 1)
+    Tasks: read affected file, find callers/imports, check test coverage
+    Analyze: root cause, impact radius, remediation (with code example), risk if unfixed
+
+    Return JSON:
+    {
+      "finding_id": "{target.id}",
+      "root_cause": "...",
+      "impact_radius": ["file1.ts", "file2.ts"],
+      "remediation": { "approach": "...", "code_example": "..." },
+      "risk_if_unfixed": "...",
+      "reassessed_severity": "critical|high|medium|low",
+      "confidence": 0.0-1.0
+    }
+
+  Merge: enrich original finding, mark complete if confidence >= 0.8,
+         update severity if reassessed. Stop early if all resolved.
+```
+
+---
+
+## Step 8: Auto-Create Issues
+
+| Level | Create issues for |
+|-------|-------------------|
+| Quick | Critical only |
+| Standard | Critical + High |
+| Deep | Critical + High + Medium |
+
+```
+Filter findings by level threshold
+
+For each qualifying finding → append issue to .workflow/issues/issues.jsonl:
+  id: "ISS-{YYYYMMDD}-{NNN}" (auto-increment from existing today's entries)
+  title: "[{dimension}] {title}" (max 100 chars)
+  status: "registered"
+  priority: severity_to_priority (critical→1, high→2, medium→3)
+  severity, source: "review", phase_ref, gap_ref: finding.id
+  description, fix_direction: finding.suggestion
+  context: { location: "{file}:{line}", suggested_fix, notes: impact }
+  tags: ["review", dimension]
+  Timestamps: created_at, updated_at = now()
+
+Link finding.issue_id back to created issue
+```
+
+---
+
+## Step 9: Write review.json
+
+Archive existing `review.json` → `${PHASE_DIR}/.history/review-{YYYY-MM-DDTHH-mm-ss}.json`
+
+```
+Write ${PHASE_DIR}/review.json:
+{
+  "phase": PHASE_NUM,
+  "level": "quick" | "standard" | "deep",
+  "verdict": "PASS" | "WARN" | "BLOCK",
+  "reviewed_at": now(),
+  "reviewer": "workflow-reviewer",
+  "dimensions_reviewed": dimensions,
+  "files_reviewed": review_files,
+  "severity_distribution": {
+    "critical": N,
+    "high": N,
+    "medium": N,
+    "low": N,
+    "total": N
+  },
+  "critical_files": critical_files,
+  "findings": all_findings,
+  "deep_dives": deep_dive_results (if any),
+  "issues_created": issue_ids[]
+}
+```
+
+---
+
+## Step 10: Update index.json
+
+```
+Update index.json.updated_at = now()
+Set index.json.review = { level, verdict, reviewed_at, severity_distribution,
+                          findings_count, issues_created count }
+```
+
+---
+
+## Report Format
+
+```
+=== CODE REVIEW RESULTS ===
+Phase:     {phase_name}
+Level:     {quick | standard | deep}
+Files:     {files_reviewed.length} files across {dimensions.length} dimensions
+Duration:  {duration}
+
+Severity Distribution:
+  Critical: {critical}
+  High:     {high}
+  Medium:   {medium}
+  Low:      {low}
+
+Top Issues:
+  1. [{severity}] {finding_id}: {title} ({file}:{line})
+  2. [{severity}] {finding_id}: {title} ({file}:{line})
+  3. [{severity}] {finding_id}: {title} ({file}:{line})
+  ... (up to 10)
+
+{IF level != "quick":
+Critical Files (3+ dimensions flagged):
+  - {file} ({dimension1}, {dimension2}, {dimension3})
+}
+
+Verdict: {PASS | WARN | BLOCK}
+Issues Created: {count}
+
+Files:
+  {artifact_dir}/review.json
+
+Next steps:
+  {suggested_next_command}
+```
+
+---
+
+## Next Step Routing
+
+| Verdict | Suggestion |
+|---------|------------|
+| PASS | Skill({ skill: "quality-test", args: "{phase}" }) for UAT, or Skill({ skill: "maestro-milestone-audit" }) if UAT already passed |
+| WARN | Review findings, then Skill({ skill: "quality-test", args: "{phase}" }) — acknowledge warnings before proceeding |
+| BLOCK (≤3 findings, all medium/low) | **Lightweight fix loop**: fix inline → re-run review on affected files only → repeat until PASS/WARN (max 2 iterations) |
+| BLOCK (>3 findings or any critical) | Full fix cycle: Skill({ skill: "maestro-plan", args: "{phase} --gaps" }) -> Skill({ skill: "maestro-execute", args: "{phase}" }) -> re-run Skill({ skill: "quality-review", args: "{phase}" }) |
+
+---
+
+## Error Handling
+
+| Error | Action |
+|-------|--------|
+| Phase directory not found | Abort: "Phase {phase} not found." |
+| No execution results | Abort: "No completed tasks found. Run maestro-execute first." |
+| No changed files | Abort: "No changed files detected in this phase." |
+| Reviewer agent fails | Log W001, continue with available dimension results |
+| All agents fail | Abort: "Review could not complete — all dimension agents failed." |
+| Deep-dive agent fails | Log finding as unresolved, skip enrichment |
+
+---
+
+## State Updates
+
+| When | Field | Value |
+|------|-------|-------|
+| Step 5 start | index.json.status | "reviewing" (if currently "verifying") |
+| Step 10 | index.json.review | Review results summary |
+| Step 10 | index.json.updated_at | Current timestamp |