loopforge 3.0.0 → 3.2.1

package/dist/loop-compiler.js

@@ -3,23 +3,20 @@
  * The compiler evolves structured state and renders one prompt artifact.
  * L0/L1/L2 control state density only; the external Agent owns reasoning.
  */
-import { deriveConstraintId, deriveCriterionId, deriveTextHash, } from "./derive-id.js";
+import { createHash } from "node:crypto";
 import { getPolicy } from "./policy.js";
-import { AgentStatus, makeLoopCompileResponse, makeLoopCompileProjection, makeLoopHealth, makeLoopObjective, makeConstraintMeta, makeMilestoneSummary, makeRollingSummary, makeTaskAlignment, } from "./protocol.js";
+import { AgentStatus, makeLoopCompileResponse, makeLoopHealth, makeLoopObjective, makeConstraintMeta, makeMilestoneSummary, makeRollingSummary, makeSubGoal, makeTaskAlignment, } from "./protocol.js";
 import { createCanonicalLoopState, renderCanonicalStateMarkdown, } from "./canonical-state.js";
-import { auditEntries, deriveGate, deriveStructuredGate } from "./cognitive-governance.js";
-import { parseRoundReport, deriveCompilerProjection } from "./round-report.js";
 import { assemblePromptArtifact } from "./prompt-assembler.js";
 import { decidePromptLevel, } from "./prompt-policy.js";
-import { jaccardSimilarity, unique, entryRound } from "./token-utils.js";
-import { manageSubGoals as deriveSubGoals } from "./compiler-subgoals.js";
+import { deriveItemId, jaccardSimilarity, unique, entryRound } from "./token-utils.js";
 function contextEntries(context) {
     if (!context || !Array.isArray(context.results))
         return [];
     return context.results.filter((value) => value !== null && typeof value === "object" && !Array.isArray(value));
 }
 function lineage(entry) {
-    const value = entry.loop_lineage;
+    const value = entry.loop_lineage ?? entry.lineage;
     return value !== null && typeof value === "object" && !Array.isArray(value)
         ? value
         : {};
@@ -29,12 +26,9 @@ function loopEntries(loopId, context) {
         .filter((entry) => entry.loop_id === loopId || lineage(entry).loop_id === loopId)
         .sort((a, b) => entryRound(a) - entryRound(b));
 }
-function entryProjection(entry) {
-    const report = parseRoundReport(entry.round_report);
-    return report ? deriveCompilerProjection(report, entryRound(entry)) : null;
-}
 export function computeGoalTextHash(text) {
-    return deriveTextHash(text, 12);
+    const normalized = text.trim().replace(/\s+/g, " ").toLowerCase();
+    return createHash("sha256").update(normalized).digest("hex").slice(0, 12);
 }
 export function deriveGoalId(loopId, task, explicit = "") {
     return explicit.trim() || `${loopId}:${task.trim().toLowerCase()
@@ -42,6 +36,34 @@ export function deriveGoalId(loopId, task, explicit = "") {
         .replace(/^-|-$/g, "")
         .slice(0, 48) || computeGoalTextHash(task)}`;
 }
+/** v3.2: Read the previous round's persisted L1 presentation snapshot — the
+ *  diff baseline for L1 collapse. Returns null when the previous round's
+ *  lineage entry exists but lacks all three presented_* fields (old-format
+ *  entries, L0/L2 compiles) — callers then render in full, which keeps
+ *  existing fixtures and pre-v3.2 loops on the full-render path. */
+export function readPresentedBaseline(loopId, round, context) {
+    const entry = [...loopEntries(loopId, context)].reverse()
+        .find((candidate) => entryRound(candidate) === round - 1);
+    if (!entry)
+        return null;
+    const data = lineage(entry);
+    const constraintIds = data.presented_constraint_ids;
+    const subGoals = data.presented_subgoals;
+    const milestoneRanges = data.presented_milestone_ranges;
+    if (!Array.isArray(constraintIds) || !constraintIds.every((v) => typeof v === "string") ||
+        !Array.isArray(subGoals) || !subGoals.every((v) => Array.isArray(v) && v.length === 2 &&
+        typeof v[0] === "string" && typeof v[1] === "string") ||
+        !Array.isArray(milestoneRanges) || !milestoneRanges.every((v) => Array.isArray(v) && v.length === 2 &&
+        typeof v[0] === "number" && typeof v[1] === "number")) {
+        return null;
+    }
+    return {
+        round: round - 1,
+        constraintIds: constraintIds,
+        subGoals: subGoals,
+        milestoneRanges: milestoneRanges,
+    };
+}
 export function getPreviousRound(loopId, round, context) {
     const entry = [...loopEntries(loopId, context)].reverse()
         .find((candidate) => entryRound(candidate) === round);
@@ -61,7 +83,9 @@ export function getPreviousRound(loopId, round, context) {
         constraints_active: Array.isArray(data.constraints_active)
             ? data.constraints_active.filter((value) => typeof value === "string")
             : [],
-        output_summary: entryProjection(entry)?.summary ?? "",
+        output_summary: typeof entry.output_summary === "string"
+            ? entry.output_summary
+            : typeof data.output_summary === "string" ? data.output_summary : "",
     };
 }
 function latestObjective(loopId, context) {
@@ -98,17 +122,17 @@ function evolveObjective(request, context) {
             created_at_round: 1,
             loop_id: request.loop_id,
         });
-    const last = request.last_round_view;
+    const last = request.last_round_result;
     const history = [...(current.refinement_history ?? [])];
     let objective = current.objective || request.task;
     let version = current.version ?? 1;
-    if (last?.objectiveRefinement?.trim()) {
-        const refinement = last.objectiveRefinement.trim();
+    if (last?.objective_refinement?.trim()) {
+        const refinement = last.objective_refinement.trim();
         history.push(refinement);
         objective = `${objective}\nRefinement: ${refinement}`;
         version++;
     }
-    const revisions = new Map((last?.criterionRevisions ?? []).map((item) => [item.old, item.new]));
+    const revisions = new Map((last?.revised_success_criteria ?? []).map((item) => [item.old, item.new]));
     return makeLoopObjective({
         ...current,
         objective,
@@ -119,66 +143,183 @@ function evolveObjective(request, context) {
         loop_id: request.loop_id,
     });
 }
-function evolveConstraints(request, objective, previous) {
-    const retired = unique(request.last_round_view?.constraintEvents?.retired ?? []);
+function evolveConstraints(request, objective, previous, context) {
+    const retired = unique(request.last_round_result?.retracted_constraints ?? []);
     const retiredSet = new Set(retired);
-    const discovered = unique(request.last_round_view?.discoveries?.newConstraints ?? [])
+    const discovered = unique(request.last_round_result?.discovered_constraints ?? [])
         .slice(0, getPolicy().evolution.max_discovered_constraints_per_round);
+    // v2.14: agent-declared retractions of plan/hard/criteria constraints
+    // persist for constraints.retire_window rounds (they are re-merged from
+    // the request/objective every round, so without this the documented
+    // "Removed from the active constraint set" never held for them). The
+    // retraction rounds are derived from vault entries — no new persistence
+    // format. After the window the constraint returns (hard/plan/criteria
+    // constraints never auto-decay — only agent action removes them, and the
+    // action's memory expires).
+    const window = getPolicy().constraints.retire_window;
+    const lastRetractedRound = new Map();
+    if (window > 0) {
+        for (const entry of loopEntries(request.loop_id, context)) {
+            const retractedList = lineage(entry).retracted_constraints;
+            if (!Array.isArray(retractedList))
+                continue;
+            const rnd = entryRound(entry);
+            for (const text of retractedList) {
+                if (typeof text !== "string" || !text)
+                    continue;
+                const prev = lastRetractedRound.get(text);
+                if (prev === undefined || rnd > prev)
+                    lastRetractedRound.set(text, rnd);
+            }
+        }
+    }
     const active = unique([
         ...(previous?.constraints_active ?? []),
         ...request.constraints_from_plan,
         ...objective.hard_constraints,
         ...objective.success_criteria,
         ...discovered,
-    ]).filter((item) => !retiredSet.has(item))
-        .slice(0, getPolicy().evolution.max_active_constraints);
+    ]).filter((item) => {
+        if (retiredSet.has(item))
+            return false;
+        const retractedRound = lastRetractedRound.get(item);
+        if (retractedRound !== undefined && request.round - retractedRound < window) {
+            return false;
+        }
+        return true;
+    }).slice(0, getPolicy().evolution.max_active_constraints);
     return { active, retired };
 }
 // ═══════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════
 // Hierarchical Summary (v2.1)
 // ═══════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════
+/** Extract execution_evidence from a vault entry, handling both direct-field
+ *  and lineage-nested shapes. Returns null when absent. */
+function entryExecutionEvidence(entry) {
+    const direct = entry.execution_evidence;
+    if (direct && typeof direct === "object" && !Array.isArray(direct)) {
+        return direct;
+    }
+    const lin = lineage(entry);
+    const nested = lin.execution_evidence;
+    if (nested && typeof nested === "object" && !Array.isArray(nested)) {
+        return nested;
+    }
+    return null;
+}
+/** Read success_criteria_met from an entry's execution_evidence. */
 function entryCriteriaMet(entry) {
-    return entryProjection(entry)?.evidence?.verifiedClaims ?? [];
-}
-function verifiedClaims(loopId, context) {
-    const facts = new Set();
-    const refs = new Set();
-    for (const entry of loopEntries(loopId, context)) {
-        const report = entry.round_report;
-        if (!report || typeof report !== "object" || Array.isArray(report))
-            continue;
-        const evidence = report.evidence;
-        if (!evidence || typeof evidence !== "object" || Array.isArray(evidence))
-            continue;
-        const envelope = evidence;
-        const provenance = envelope.provenance;
-        if (!provenance || typeof provenance !== "object" || Array.isArray(provenance))
-            continue;
-        const provenanceMap = provenance;
-        if (!Array.isArray(envelope.claims))
-            continue;
-        for (const raw of envelope.claims) {
-            if (!raw || typeof raw !== "object" || Array.isArray(raw))
-                continue;
-            const claim = raw;
-            if (typeof claim.targetId !== "string" || !Array.isArray(claim.evidenceRefs))
-                continue;
-            const verifiedRefs = claim.evidenceRefs.filter((ref) => {
-                if (typeof ref !== "string")
-                    return false;
-                const value = provenanceMap[ref];
-                return Boolean(value && typeof value === "object" && !Array.isArray(value) &&
-                    value.status === "verified" &&
-                    value.source !== "agent");
-            });
-            if (verifiedRefs.length === 0)
+    const ev = entryExecutionEvidence(entry);
+    if (!ev)
+        return [];
+    const arr = ev.success_criteria_met;
+    return Array.isArray(arr) ? arr.filter((v) => typeof v === "string") : [];
+}
+/** Read success_criteria_remaining from an entry's execution_evidence. */
+function entryCriteriaRemaining(entry) {
+    const ev = entryExecutionEvidence(entry);
+    if (!ev)
+        return [];
+    const arr = ev.success_criteria_remaining;
+    return Array.isArray(arr) ? arr.filter((v) => typeof v === "string") : [];
+}
+/** v3.2: Deterministic lessons learned — constraints violated repeatedly or
+ *  verification checks failing repeatedly across rounds (full history, unlike
+ *  the enforcement gate's R2 3-round window). Presentation only: the output
+ *  never feeds enforcement decisions. */
+export function deriveLessons(loopId, context, currentRound) {
+    const entries = loopEntries(loopId, context).filter((entry) => entryRound(entry) >= 1 && entryRound(entry) < currentRound);
+    const violations = new Map();
+    const errors = new Map();
+    const warns = new Map();
+    for (const entry of entries) {
+        const rnd = entryRound(entry);
+        const viols = Array.isArray(entry.constraint_violations)
+            ? entry.constraint_violations.filter((v) => typeof v === "string")
+            : [];
+        for (const text of viols) {
+            const list = violations.get(text) ?? [];
+            list.push(rnd);
+            violations.set(text, list);
+        }
+        const flags = Array.isArray(entry.verification_flags)
+            ? entry.verification_flags
+            : [];
+        for (const flag of flags) {
+            const target = flag.severity === "error"
+                ? errors
+                : flag.severity === "warn" ? warns : null;
+            if (!target)
                 continue;
-            facts.add(claim.targetId);
-            for (const ref of verifiedRefs)
-                refs.add(ref);
+            const list = target.get(flag.check) ?? [];
+            list.push(rnd);
+            target.set(flag.check, list);
+        }
+    }
+    const lessons = [];
+    for (const [text, rounds] of violations) {
+        if (rounds.length >= 2) {
+            lessons.push({ text, kind: "constraint_violation", count: rounds.length, rounds });
+        }
+    }
+    for (const [text, rounds] of errors) {
+        if (rounds.length >= 2) {
+            lessons.push({ text, kind: "verification_error", count: rounds.length, rounds });
         }
     }
-    return { facts: [...facts].sort(), refs: [...refs].sort() };
+    for (const [text, rounds] of warns) {
+        if (rounds.length >= 2) {
+            lessons.push({ text, kind: "verification_warning", count: rounds.length, rounds });
+        }
+    }
+    return lessons.sort((a, b) => b.count - a.count);
+}
+/** v3.2: Derive per-criterion status — the "goal → criteria → evidence"
+ *  vertical view. Each objective criterion gets: met/remaining/unknown
+ *  (from per-round success_criteria_met/remaining reports, ID-first
+ *  matching), the round it was first reported met, and any sub-goals whose
+ *  description matches it (Jaccard). Zero persistence — re-derived from the
+ *  vault every compile. */
+export function deriveCriterionStatuses(loopId, context, objective, currentRound, subGoals, lastRoundResult) {
+    if (!objective || objective.success_criteria.length === 0)
+        return [];
+    const entries = loopEntries(loopId, context).filter((entry) => entryRound(entry) >= 1 && entryRound(entry) < currentRound);
+    // The current round's report lives in last_round_result (the vault only
+    // gains it on commit); treat it as the report for round currentRound - 1.
+    const lastEv = lastRoundResult?.execution_evidence;
+    const lastMet = lastEv?.success_criteria_met ?? [];
+    const lastRemaining = lastEv?.success_criteria_remaining ?? [];
+    const lastEntry = entries[entries.length - 1] ?? null;
+    const lastEntryRemaining = lastEntry ? entryCriteriaRemaining(lastEntry) : [];
+    const matchThreshold = getPolicy().evolution.subgoal_match_threshold;
+    return objective.success_criteria.map((text) => {
+        let metAtRound = null;
+        for (const entry of entries) {
+            const rnd = entryRound(entry);
+            if (entryCriteriaMet(entry).some((met) => criteriaMatch(met, text))) {
+                metAtRound = rnd;
+                break; // first report wins — chronological scan
+            }
+        }
+        if (metAtRound === null && lastMet.some((met) => criteriaMatch(met, text))) {
+            metAtRound = currentRound - 1;
+        }
+        const status = metAtRound !== null
+            ? "met"
+            : lastRemaining.some((remaining) => criteriaMatch(remaining, text)) ||
+                lastEntryRemaining.some((remaining) => criteriaMatch(remaining, text))
+                ? "remaining"
+                : "unknown";
+        return {
+            id: deriveCriterionId(text),
+            text,
+            status,
+            ...(metAtRound !== null ? { met_at_round: metAtRound } : {}),
+            related_subgoal_ids: subGoals
+                .filter((sg) => jaccardSimilarity(text, sg.description) >= matchThreshold)
+                .map((sg) => sg.id),
+        };
+    });
 }
 /** v2.11: Match two criterion references for deduplication.
  *  If either is a criterion ID (cr-XXXXXXXX), uses exact ID comparison.
@@ -197,9 +338,6 @@ function criteriaMatch(a, b) {
     // Neither is an ID — Jaccard fallback
     return jaccardSimilarity(a, b) >= getPolicy().evolution.criteria_dedup_threshold;
 }
-function isCriterionId(ref) {
-    return /^cr-[a-f0-9]{8}$/.test(ref);
-}
 /** Detect newly met criteria by comparing the current entry's
  *  success_criteria_met against the previous entry's.
  *  v2.11: ID-first matching (cr-XXXXXXXX) with Jaccard similarity
@@ -227,15 +365,29 @@ function entryActiveConstraints(entry) {
 }
 /** Read retracted_constraints from an entry. */
 function entryRetractedConstraints(entry) {
-    return entryProjection(entry)?.constraintEvents?.retired ?? [];
+    const direct = entry.retracted_constraints;
+    if (Array.isArray(direct))
+        return direct.filter((v) => typeof v === "string");
+    const lin = lineage(entry);
+    const nested = lin.retracted_constraints;
+    if (Array.isArray(nested))
+        return nested.filter((v) => typeof v === "string");
+    return [];
 }
+/** Read progress_estimate from an entry's execution_evidence. */
 function entryProgressEstimate(entry) {
-    return entryProjection(entry)?.evidence?.progressRatio ?? 0;
+    const ev = entryExecutionEvidence(entry);
+    if (!ev)
+        return 0;
+    const pe = ev.progress_estimate;
+    return typeof pe === "number" ? pe : 0;
 }
 /** Build a single MilestoneSummary from a range of completed round entries. */
 function buildMilestoneFromEntries(phaseEntries, startRound, endRound, label, kind) {
     const last = phaseEntries.at(-1);
-    const outcomeRaw = last ? entryProjection(last)?.summary ?? "" : "";
+    const outcomeRaw = last
+        ? (typeof last.output_summary === "string" ? last.output_summary : "")
+        : "";
     const outcomeMax = getPolicy().checkpoint.outcome_max_chars;
     const outcome = outcomeRaw.length > outcomeMax
         ? outcomeRaw.slice(0, outcomeMax) + "…"
@@ -254,7 +406,56 @@ function buildMilestoneFromEntries(phaseEntries, startRound, endRound, label, ki
         generated_at_round: endRound,
     });
 }
-export function buildRollingSummary(loopId, currentRound, context, sinceRound = 0) {
+/** v3.0.1: Evenly sample `budget` entries from `mid`, preferring
+ *  agent_declared milestones (human/agent-labeled anchors) first and filling
+ *  the remainder at even time positions. The caller guarantees
+ *  `mid.length > budget`. */
+function sampleMiddleMilestones(mid, budget) {
+    if (budget <= 0)
+        return [];
+    if (mid.length <= budget)
+        return mid;
+    const chosen = [];
+    const used = new Set();
+    for (const m of mid) {
+        if (m.kind === "agent_declared") {
+            chosen.push(m);
+            used.add(m);
+            if (chosen.length >= budget)
+                return chosen;
+        }
+    }
+    const rest = mid.filter((m) => !used.has(m));
+    const need = budget - chosen.length;
+    for (let i = 0; i < need; i++) {
+        const idx = Math.floor(((i + 0.5) * rest.length) / need);
+        chosen.push(rest[idx]);
+    }
+    return chosen;
+}
+/** v3.0.1: L1 milestone sampling — when milestones exceed max_milestones,
+ *  keep the oldest `milestone_head_count` (history anchors), the newest
+ *  `milestone_tail_count` (current progress), and an even sample of the
+ *  middle. L2 (full rehydration) is never sampled: the recovery view keeps
+ *  every milestone as the loop's memory skeleton. */
+function sampleMilestones(milestones, policy, level) {
+    if (level === "l2")
+        return milestones;
+    if (milestones.length <= policy.max_milestones)
+        return milestones;
+    const head = Math.max(0, policy.milestone_head_count);
+    const tail = Math.max(0, policy.milestone_tail_count);
+    const midBudget = Math.max(0, policy.max_milestones - head - tail);
+    if (midBudget === 0)
+        return milestones.slice(0, head).concat(milestones.slice(milestones.length - tail));
+    const mid = milestones.slice(head, milestones.length - tail);
+    return [
+        ...milestones.slice(0, head),
+        ...sampleMiddleMilestones(mid, midBudget),
+        ...milestones.slice(milestones.length - tail),
+    ];
+}
+export function buildRollingSummary(loopId, currentRound, context, sinceRound = 0, level) {
     const policy = getPolicy().summary;
     const allEntries = loopEntries(loopId, context);
     // ── Phase 1: Recent Window (preserves existing behavior) ──
@@ -270,48 +471,35 @@ export function buildRollingSummary(loopId, currentRound, context, sinceRound =
         const data = lineage(entry);
         const round = entryRound(entry);
         const success = entry.success ?? data.success;
-        const summary = entryProjection(entry)?.summary ?? "";
+        const summary = typeof entry.output_summary === "string"
+            ? entry.output_summary
+            : typeof data.output_summary === "string" ? data.output_summary : "";
+        // v2.12: Declared outcome wins the label; the default wording stays
+        // "accepted" for zero regression on existing loop output.
+        const declared = entry.outcome;
+        const outcomeLabel = declared === "success" || declared === "partial" ||
+            declared === "failed" || declared === "blocked"
+            ? declared
+            : success === false ? "failed" : "accepted";
         if (summary)
-            outcomes.push(`[R${round}] ${success === false ? "failed" : "accepted"}: ${summary}`);
-        const violations = entryProjection(entry)?.violations ?? [];
+            outcomes.push(`[R${round}] ${outcomeLabel}: ${summary}`);
+        const violations = Array.isArray(entry.constraint_violations)
+            ? entry.constraint_violations
+            : Array.isArray(data.constraint_violations) ? data.constraint_violations : [];
         issues.push(...violations.filter((item) => typeof item === "string"));
     }
-    const issueCounts = new Map();
-    for (const issue of issues) {
-        const key = issue.trim().replace(/\s+/g, " ").toLowerCase();
-        if (!key)
-            continue;
-        const previous = issueCounts.get(key);
-        issueCounts.set(key, { text: previous?.text ?? issue.trim(), count: (previous?.count ?? 0) + 1 });
-    }
     // ── Phase 2: Milestone Accumulation ──
     // Scan all completed entries in round order. For each entry, check three
     // trigger signals in priority order: agent_declared > criteria_milestone > auto.
     const completedEntries = allEntries.filter((entry) => entryRound(entry) >= 1 && entryRound(entry) < currentRound);
-    const failedGroups = [];
-    for (const entry of completedEntries) {
-        const data = lineage(entry);
-        if ((entry.success ?? data.success) !== false)
-            continue;
-        const text = (entryProjection(entry)?.summary ?? "").trim();
-        if (!text)
-            continue;
-        const group = failedGroups.find((candidate) => jaccardSimilarity(candidate.text, text) >= getPolicy().evolution.failed_pattern_match_threshold);
-        if (group)
-            group.count++;
-        else
-            failedGroups.push({ text, count: 1 });
-    }
     const milestones = [];
     let lastMilestoneRound = 0;
     for (let i = 0; i < completedEntries.length; i++) {
         const entry = completedEntries[i];
         const rnd = entryRound(entry);
         const lin = lineage(entry);
-        const report = parseRoundReport(entry.round_report);
         // Signal 1: Agent-declared checkpoint
-        const isAgentCheckpoint = Boolean(report?.phaseBoundaryProposal) ||
-            lin.compression_checkpoint === true;
+        const isAgentCheckpoint = lin.compression_checkpoint === true;
         // Signal 2: New criteria met (compare with previous vault entry)
         const prev = i > 0 ? completedEntries[i - 1] : null;
         const newCriteria = detectNewCriteria(entry, prev);
@@ -325,10 +513,9 @@ export function buildRollingSummary(loopId, currentRound, context, sinceRound =
                 ? "agent_declared"
                 : "criteria_milestone";
             const label = isAgentCheckpoint
-                ? (report?.phaseBoundaryProposal?.label?.trim() ||
-                    (typeof lin.checkpoint_label === "string" && lin.checkpoint_label.trim()
-                        ? lin.checkpoint_label.trim()
-                        : `Round ${rnd}`))
+                ? (typeof lin.checkpoint_label === "string" && lin.checkpoint_label.trim()
+                    ? lin.checkpoint_label.trim()
+                    : `Round ${rnd}`)
                 : `Completed: ${newCriteria.join(", ")}`;
             milestones.push(buildMilestoneFromEntries(phaseEntries, startRound, rnd, label, kind));
             lastMilestoneRound = rnd;
@@ -349,7 +536,10 @@ export function buildRollingSummary(loopId, currentRound, context, sinceRound =
             milestones.push(buildMilestoneFromEntries(phaseEntries, startRound, endRound, `Rounds ${startRound}–${endRound}`, "auto"));
         }
     }
-    const cappedMilestones = milestones.slice(-policy.max_milestones);
+    // v3.0.1: L1 keeps head anchors + newest tail + an even middle sample;
+    // L2 (full rehydration) keeps every milestone — the recovery view is the
+    // loop's memory skeleton and must not be truncated.
+    const cappedMilestones = sampleMilestones(milestones, policy, level);
     // ── Phase 3: Loop Synthesis (formulaic) ──
     let loopSynthesis = "";
     if (policy.enable_loop_synthesis && currentRound > 1) {
@@ -371,20 +561,237 @@ export function buildRollingSummary(loopId, currentRound, context, sinceRound =
         return null;
     return makeRollingSummary({
         key_outcomes: unique(outcomes),
-        recurring_issues: [...issueCounts.values()]
-            .filter((issue) => issue.count >= 2)
-            .map((issue) => `${issue.text} (${issue.count} rounds)`),
+        recurring_issues: unique(issues),
         rounds_sampled: windowEntries.length,
         generated_at_round: currentRound,
-        failed_patterns: failedGroups
-            .filter((failure) => failure.count >= 2)
-            .map((failure) => `${failure.text} (${failure.count} attempts)`),
+        failed_patterns: [],
         milestones: cappedMilestones,
         loop_synthesis: loopSynthesis || undefined,
     });
 }
-// Sub-goal lifecycle is implemented in compiler-subgoals.ts; this facade keeps
-// the compiler's public entry point and projection flow unchanged.
+// ═══════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════
+// Sub-Goal Structured Tracking (v2.2)
+// ═══════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════
+/** Derive a stable sub-goal ID from its description hash.
+ *  Exported as the single source of truth (verification-gate imports it). */
+export function deriveSubGoalId(description) {
+    return "sg-" + deriveItemId(description);
+}
+/** v2.11: Derive a stable constraint ID from its text hash (c-XXXXXXXX).
+ *  Same hash strategy as SubGoal — deterministic across rounds. */
+export function deriveConstraintId(text) {
+    return "c-" + deriveItemId(text);
+}
+/** v2.11: Derive a stable criterion ID from its text hash (cr-XXXXXXXX).
+ *  Same hash strategy as SubGoal — deterministic across rounds. */
+export function deriveCriterionId(text) {
+    return "cr-" + deriveItemId(text);
+}
+/** v2.11: Check whether a user-provided reference looks like a constraint ID.
+ *  Matches the pattern c-XXXXXXXX where X is a hex digit. */
+export function isConstraintId(ref) {
+    return /^c-[a-f0-9]{8}$/.test(ref);
+}
+/** v2.11: Check whether a user-provided reference looks like a criterion ID.
+ *  Matches the pattern cr-XXXXXXXX where X is a hex digit. */
+export function isCriterionId(ref) {
+    return /^cr-[a-f0-9]{8}$/.test(ref);
+}
+/** Read emerged_subtasks from a vault entry (handles direct + lineage nesting). */
+function entryEmergedSubtasks(entry) {
+    const direct = entry.emerged_subtasks;
+    if (Array.isArray(direct))
+        return direct.filter((v) => typeof v === "string");
+    const lin = lineage(entry);
+    const nested = lin.emerged_subtasks;
+    if (Array.isArray(nested))
+        return nested.filter((v) => typeof v === "string");
+    return [];
+}
+/** Read completed_subtasks from an entry. */
+function entryCompletedSubtasks(entry) {
+    const direct = entry.completed_subtasks;
+    if (Array.isArray(direct))
+        return direct.filter((v) => typeof v === "string");
+    return [];
+}
+/** Read blocked_subtasks from an entry. */
+function entryBlockedSubtasks(entry) {
+    const direct = entry.blocked_subtasks;
+    if (Array.isArray(direct))
+        return direct.filter((v) => typeof v === "string");
+    return [];
+}
+/** Read canceled_subtasks from an entry. */
+function entryCanceledSubtasks(entry) {
+    const direct = entry.canceled_subtasks;
+    if (Array.isArray(direct))
+        return direct.filter((v) => typeof v === "string");
+    return [];
+}
+/**
+ * Match a user-provided sub-task reference against existing SubGoals.
+ *
+ * Tries exact SubGoal ID match first (e.g. "sg-a3f2b1c0"), then falls
+ * back to Jaccard token similarity on descriptions. Returns the index
+ * of the best-matching SubGoal, or -1 when no match reaches threshold.
+ */
+function matchSubGoal(target, subGoals, threshold) {
+    const trimmed = target.trim();
+    // Phase 1: Exact ID match
+    for (let i = 0; i < subGoals.length; i++) {
+        if (subGoals[i].id === trimmed)
+            return i;
+    }
+    // Phase 2: Jaccard fallback on description text
+    let bestIdx = -1;
+    let bestScore = 0;
+    for (let i = 0; i < subGoals.length; i++) {
+        const score = jaccardSimilarity(trimmed, subGoals[i].description);
+        if (score > bestScore) {
+            bestScore = score;
+            bestIdx = i;
+        }
+    }
+    return bestScore >= threshold ? bestIdx : -1;
+}
+/**
+ * Manage the full sub-goal lifecycle across rounds.
+ *
+ * Accumulates sub-goals from all prior vault entries, processes the current
+ * round's declarations, derives status changes, and returns the complete
+ * structured SubGoal list.
+ *
+ * Status derivation priority (compiler-driven):
+ *   1. Agent declared done/canceled/blocked → explicit status change
+ *   2. next_action match → auto in_progress
+ *   3. success_criteria_met match → auto done
+ */
+function manageSubGoals(loopId, currentRound, lastRoundResult, vaultContext) {
+    const policy = getPolicy().evolution;
+    const allEntries = loopEntries(loopId, vaultContext);
+    const completedEntries = allEntries.filter((e) => entryRound(e) >= 1 && entryRound(e) < currentRound);
+    const subGoals = [];
+    // Phase 1 — Accumulate historical sub-goals from vault entries
+    for (const entry of completedEntries) {
+        const rnd = entryRound(entry);
+        const emerged = entryEmergedSubtasks(entry);
+        for (const desc of emerged) {
+            const id = deriveSubGoalId(desc);
+            // Dedup: skip if an existing sub-goal is too similar
+            if (matchSubGoal(desc, subGoals, policy.subgoal_dedup_threshold) >= 0)
+                continue;
+            subGoals.push(makeSubGoal({
+                id,
+                description: desc.trim(),
+                status: "pending",
+                declared_at_round: rnd,
+                status_changed_at_round: rnd,
+                priority: subGoals.length,
+            }));
+        }
+    }
+    // Phase 2 — Process current round's sub-task declarations
+    if (lastRoundResult) {
+        const rnd = lastRoundResult.round || (currentRound - 1);
+        // New sub-goals from this round
+        const emerged = lastRoundResult.emerged_subtasks ?? [];
+        for (const desc of emerged) {
+            if (matchSubGoal(desc, subGoals, policy.subgoal_dedup_threshold) >= 0)
+                continue;
+            subGoals.push(makeSubGoal({
+                id: deriveSubGoalId(desc),
+                description: desc.trim(),
+                status: "pending",
+                declared_at_round: rnd,
+                status_changed_at_round: rnd,
+                priority: subGoals.length,
+            }));
+        }
+        // Completed sub-goals
+        const completed = lastRoundResult.completed_subtasks ?? [];
+        for (const desc of completed) {
+            const idx = matchSubGoal(desc, subGoals, policy.subgoal_match_threshold);
+            if (idx >= 0 && subGoals[idx].status !== "done" && subGoals[idx].status !== "canceled") {
+                subGoals[idx].status = "done";
+                subGoals[idx].status_changed_at_round = rnd;
+                subGoals[idx].completed_at_round = rnd;
+            }
+        }
+        // Blocked sub-goals
+        const blocked = lastRoundResult.blocked_subtasks ?? [];
+        for (const desc of blocked) {
+            const idx = matchSubGoal(desc, subGoals, policy.subgoal_match_threshold);
+            if (idx >= 0 && subGoals[idx].status !== "done" && subGoals[idx].status !== "canceled") {
+                subGoals[idx].status = "blocked";
+                subGoals[idx].status_changed_at_round = rnd;
+            }
+        }
+        // Canceled sub-goals
+        const canceled = lastRoundResult.canceled_subtasks ?? [];
+        for (const desc of canceled) {
+            const idx = matchSubGoal(desc, subGoals, policy.subgoal_match_threshold);
+            if (idx >= 0 && subGoals[idx].status !== "done" && subGoals[idx].status !== "canceled") {
+                subGoals[idx].status = "canceled";
+                subGoals[idx].status_changed_at_round = rnd;
+            }
+        }
+        // Phase 3 — Auto-derive: next_action match → in_progress
+        const nextAction = lastRoundResult.next_action?.trim();
+        if (nextAction) {
+            for (const sg of subGoals) {
+                if (sg.status === "pending") {
+                    if (jaccardSimilarity(nextAction, sg.description) >= policy.subgoal_auto_in_progress_threshold) {
+                        sg.status = "in_progress";
+                        sg.status_changed_at_round = rnd;
+                        break; // Only one sub-goal can be in_progress at a time
+                    }
+                }
+            }
+        }
+        // Phase 4 — Auto-complete: new criteria match → done
+        const newCriteria = lastRoundResult.execution_evidence?.success_criteria_met ?? [];
+        if (newCriteria.length > 0) {
+            for (const sg of subGoals) {
+                if (sg.status === "pending" || sg.status === "in_progress") {
+                    for (const crit of newCriteria) {
+                        if (jaccardSimilarity(crit, sg.description) >= policy.subgoal_auto_complete_threshold) {
+                            sg.status = "done";
+                            sg.status_changed_at_round = rnd;
+                            sg.completed_at_round = rnd;
+                            break;
+                        }
+                    }
+                }
+            }
+        }
+    }
+    // Sort for display: in_progress first, then pending by age desc, then blocked, then done, then canceled
+    subGoals.sort((a, b) => {
+        const rank = (s) => {
+            switch (s.status) {
+                case "in_progress": return 0;
+                case "pending": return 1;
+                case "blocked": return 2;
+                case "done": return 3;
+                case "canceled": return 4;
+            }
+        };
+        const ra = rank(a), rb = rank(b);
+        if (ra !== rb)
+            return ra - rb;
+        // Within same status: pending by oldest first, done by most recent first
+        // (v2.14: the previous expression simplified to b.declared - a.declared,
+        // which sorted NEWEST first despite the comment)
+        if (a.status === "pending")
+            return a.declared_at_round - b.declared_at_round;
+        if (a.status === "done")
+            return (b.completed_at_round ?? 0) - (a.completed_at_round ?? 0);
+        return a.declared_at_round - b.declared_at_round;
+    });
+    return subGoals;
+}
+// ═══════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════
 // Time-Aware Constraint Management (v2.3)
 // ═══════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════
 /** Determine the source of a constraint by matching against known sources. */
@@ -409,7 +816,9 @@ function findDiscoveredRound(text, vaultEntries) {
         const rnd = entryRound(entry);
         if (rnd < 1)
             continue;
-        const discovered = entryProjection(entry)?.discoveries?.newConstraints ?? [];
+        const discovered = Array.isArray(entry.discovered_constraints)
+            ? entry.discovered_constraints.filter((v) => typeof v === "string")
+            : [];
         for (const d of discovered) {
             // Phase 1: exact ID match (v2.11)
             if (d === targetId || deriveConstraintId(d) === targetId) {
@@ -431,23 +840,27 @@ function findDiscoveredRound(text, vaultEntries) {
  *  v2.11: ID-first matching. Checks exact constraint ID match (c-XXXXXXXX)
  *  against the derived ID of each vault entry's constraint_violations, then
  *  falls back to Jaccard similarity on text. Returns 0 if never violated. */
-function findLastViolatedRound(text, vaultEntries) {
+/** True when a reported violation text matches a constraint text — same
+ *  ID-first + Jaccard fallback matching as findLastViolatedRound. */
+function matchesConstraintText(text, violation) {
     const targetId = deriveConstraintId(text);
+    if (violation === targetId || deriveConstraintId(violation) === targetId) {
+        return true;
+    }
+    return jaccardSimilarity(text, violation) >=
+        getPolicy().evolution.constraint_match_threshold;
+}
+function findLastViolatedRound(text, vaultEntries) {
     let latest = 0;
     for (const entry of vaultEntries) {
         const rnd = entryRound(entry);
         if (rnd < 1)
             continue;
-        const violations = entryProjection(entry)?.violations ?? [];
+        const violations = Array.isArray(entry.constraint_violations)
+            ? entry.constraint_violations.filter((v) => typeof v === "string")
+            : [];
         for (const v of violations) {
-            // Phase 1: exact ID match (v2.11)
-            if (v === targetId || deriveConstraintId(v) === targetId) {
-                if (rnd > latest)
-                    latest = rnd;
-                break;
-            }
-            // Phase 2: Jaccard fallback (backward compatibility)
-            if (jaccardSimilarity(text, v) >= getPolicy().evolution.constraint_match_threshold) {
+            if (matchesConstraintText(text, v)) {
                 if (rnd > latest)
                     latest = rnd;
                 break;
@@ -464,20 +877,29 @@ function findLastViolatedRound(text, vaultEntries) {
  * constraints never auto-decay. Inactive constraints are auto-reactivated
  * if violated again in the current round.
  */
-function manageConstraintLifecycle(active, objective, constraintsFromPlan, vaultContext, currentRound) {
+function manageConstraintLifecycle(active, objective, constraintsFromPlan, vaultContext, currentRound, lastRoundViolations = []) {
     const policy = getPolicy().evolution;
     const allEntries = loopEntries(objective.loop_id || "", vaultContext);
     const completedEntries = allEntries.filter((e) => entryRound(e) >= 1 && entryRound(e) < currentRound);
     const metadata = [];
     for (const text of active) {
         const source = constraintSource(text, objective, constraintsFromPlan);
+        // v3.2.1: a violation reported in THIS round (last_round_result) counts
+        // as a violation at currentRound — the previous rounds' scan cannot see
+        // it (this round is not committed yet). This makes the L1 collapse
+        // render "(violated this round)" (diffConstraints compares
+        // last_violated_at_round === round) and re-activates decayed
+        // discovered constraints.
+        const violatedThisRound = lastRoundViolations.some((v) => matchesConstraintText(text, v));
         // Structural constraints never decay
         if (source === "hard" || source === "plan" || source === "criteria") {
             metadata.push(makeConstraintMeta({
                 id: deriveConstraintId(text),
                 text,
                 discovered_at_round: objective.created_at_round || 1,
-                last_violated_at_round: findLastViolatedRound(text, completedEntries),
+                last_violated_at_round: violatedThisRound
+                    ? currentRound
+                    : findLastViolatedRound(text, completedEntries),
                 source,
                 status: "active",
             }));
@@ -485,7 +907,9 @@ function manageConstraintLifecycle(active, objective, constraintsFromPlan, vault
         }
         // Discovered constraints: check for inactivity
         const discoveredAt = findDiscoveredRound(text, completedEntries);
-        const lastViolated = findLastViolatedRound(text, completedEntries);
+        const lastViolated = violatedThisRound
+            ? currentRound
+            : findLastViolatedRound(text, completedEntries);
         const roundsSinceRelevant = lastViolated > 0
             ? currentRound - lastViolated
             : currentRound - (discoveredAt || currentRound);
@@ -513,21 +937,25 @@ export function alignTask(proposedTask, request, context) {
     const objective = request.loop_objective ?? latestObjective(request.loop_id, context);
     if (!objective)
         return makeTaskAlignment();
+    // v2.14: threshold is policy-driven (evolution.progress_mismatch_threshold)
+    const threshold = getPolicy().evolution.progress_mismatch_threshold;
     const score = jaccardSimilarity(proposedTask, [objective.objective, ...objective.success_criteria, ...objective.hard_constraints].join(" "));
     return makeTaskAlignment({
-        is_aligned: score >= 0.3,
+        is_aligned: score >= threshold,
         alignment_score: Number(score.toFixed(2)),
-        warning: score < 0.3 ? "Current task may be drifting from the loop objective." : "",
-        escalation: score < 0.3 ? "warn" : "none",
+        warning: score < threshold ? "Current task may be drifting from the loop objective." : "",
+        escalation: score < threshold ? "warn" : "none",
     });
 }
 export function checkLoopHealth(loopId, request, context) {
     const previous = getPreviousRound(loopId, request.round - 1, context);
     const alignment = alignTask(request.task, request, context);
-    const violations = request.last_round_view?.violations?.length ?? 0;
+    const violations = request.last_round_result?.constraint_violations.length ?? 0;
     const integrity = Math.max(0, 1 - violations * 0.2);
     const continuity = previous ? jaccardSimilarity(previous.task, request.task) : 1;
-    const drift = alignment.alignment_score < 0.3 || continuity < 0.2;
+    // v2.14: thresholds are policy-driven
+    const drift = alignment.alignment_score < getPolicy().evolution.progress_mismatch_threshold ||
+        continuity < getPolicy().evolution.task_continuity_threshold;
     return makeLoopHealth({
         goal_alignment: alignment.alignment_score,
         constraint_integrity: integrity,
@@ -539,115 +967,91 @@ export function checkLoopHealth(loopId, request, context) {
 }
 function levelDecision(request, context) {
     const previous = getPreviousRound(request.loop_id, request.round - 1, context);
-    const last = request.last_round_view;
+    const last = request.last_round_result;
     const hasNewInformation = Boolean(request.new_since_last_round.trim() ||
-        last?.discoveries?.newConstraints?.length ||
-        last?.objectiveRefinement?.trim() ||
-        last?.discoveries?.emergedWork?.length ||
-        last?.constraintEvents?.retired?.length ||
-        last?.criterionRevisions?.length ||
-        last?.discoveries?.wrongAssumptions?.length ||
-        last?.evidence?.verifiedClaims.length);
+        last?.discovered_constraints?.length ||
+        last?.objective_refinement?.trim() ||
+        last?.emerged_subtasks?.length ||
+        last?.retracted_constraints?.length ||
+        last?.revised_success_criteria?.length ||
+        last?.wrong_assumptions?.length);
     const lastFullRound = loopEntries(request.loop_id, context)
         .filter((entry) => lineage(entry).recompile_level === "l2")
         .map(entryRound)
         .filter((round) => round < request.round)
         .at(-1) ?? 1;
-    const entries = loopEntries(request.loop_id, context)
-        .filter((entry) => entryRound(entry) < request.round);
-    const lastMeaningfulRound = [...entries].reverse().find((entry) => {
-        const data = lineage(entry);
-        const evidence = entryProjection(entry)?.evidence;
-        return Boolean(entryCriteriaMet(entry).length ||
-            evidence?.observedFiles.length ||
-            entryProjection(entry)?.discoveries?.newConstraints.length ||
-            entryProjection(entry)?.discoveries?.emergedWork.length);
-    });
-    const meaningfulSections = 2 + [
-        request.task.trim(),
-        ...(last?.violations ?? []),
-        ...(last?.evidence?.criteriaRemaining ?? []),
-        ...(last?.evidence?.criteriaMet ?? []),
-        ...(last?.discoveries?.newConstraints ?? []),
-        ...(last?.discoveries?.emergedWork ?? []),
-        ...(last?.evidence?.observedFiles ?? []),
-    ].filter(Boolean).length;
-    const promptPolicy = getPolicy().prompt;
+    // v2.14: a backtrack committed for this round means the loop is
+    // re-walking restored state — the recovery boundary forces L2
+    // rehydration (the decidePromptLevel recovery_boundary branch existed
+    // but no caller ever set it).
+    const recoveryBoundary = loopEntries(request.loop_id, context)
+        .some((entry) => lineage(entry).committed_action === "backtrack" &&
+        entryRound(entry) === request.round);
     return decidePromptLevel({
         round: request.round,
         attempt: request.attempt,
         forceLevel: request.force_level,
         hasPlanSource: Boolean(request.plan_source),
-        checkpointBoundary: Boolean(last?.phaseBoundaryProposal),
-        goalChanged: Boolean(last?.objectiveRefinement?.trim()) ||
-            (previous !== null && previous.goal_id !== deriveGoalId(request.loop_id, request.task, request.goal_id)),
-        constraintChanged: Boolean(last?.discoveries?.newConstraints?.length || last?.constraintEvents?.retired?.length),
+        recoveryBoundary,
+        checkpointBoundary: last?.compression_checkpoint === true,
+        goalChanged: previous !== null && previous.goal_id !== deriveGoalId(request.loop_id, request.task, request.goal_id),
         previousStateMissing: request.round > 1 && previous === null,
-        previousFailedWithoutNewInformation: last?.outcome === "failed" && !hasNewInformation,
+        previousFailedWithoutNewInformation: last?.success === false && !hasNewInformation,
         verificationContradicted: (request.verification_flags ?? [])
             .some((flag) => flag.severity === "error"),
         consecutiveRejections: request.consecutive_rejections,
         fullRefreshInterval: getPolicy().prompt.full_refresh_interval,
         lastFullRound,
-        l1Streak: Math.max(0, request.round - lastFullRound - 1),
-        maxL1Streak: promptPolicy.adaptive_refresh ? promptPolicy.max_l1_streak : undefined,
-        meaningfulSections: request.round <= 2
-            ? Math.max(meaningfulSections, promptPolicy.min_meaningful_sections)
-            : meaningfulSections,
-        minMeaningfulSections: promptPolicy.adaptive_refresh
-            ? promptPolicy.min_meaningful_sections
-            : undefined,
-        staleProgressRounds: request.round - (lastMeaningfulRound ? entryRound(lastMeaningfulRound) : 1),
-        staleRoundThreshold: promptPolicy.adaptive_refresh
-            ? promptPolicy.stale_round_threshold
-            : undefined,
     });
 }
 export function decideLevel(request, context) {
     return levelDecision(request, context).level;
 }
-export function buildRoundReportBlock(round, prevDriftFlags) {
+export function buildSelfEvalBlock(round, prevDriftFlags, 
+/** v2.12: L0 is the minimal retry template — the v2.12 declarative fields
+ *  (outcome/blocker/retroactiveClaims) are L1/L2 additions so the retry
+ *  prompt stays within its tight budget. */
+level) {
     const hasIntentDrift = prevDriftFlags?.some(f => f.check === "intent_drift") ?? false;
     const hasSubGoalDrift = prevDriftFlags?.some(f => f.check === "subgoal_drift") ?? false;
     const needsClarification = hasIntentDrift || hasSubGoalDrift;
-    const report = {
-        format: "loopforge.round-report",
-        outcome: "partial",
-        continuation: "continue",
-        summary: `<verified result of round ${round}>`,
-        violations: [],
-        evidence: {
-            files: [],
-            checks: [{ name: "<configured provider or command name>", status: "not_run" }],
-            claims: [{
-                    id: "claim-<12 hex chars>",
-                    targetId: "<cr-XXXXXXXX or criterion text>",
-                    evidenceRefs: ["provider:<name>"],
-                }],
-            noChangeReason: "",
+    const declareOutcome = level !== "l0";
+    const evalObj = {
+        success: false,
+        output_summary: `<verified result of round ${round}>`,
+        constraint_violations: ["<c-XXXXXXXX or text>"],
+        should_continue: true,
+        discovered_constraints: ["<new constraint>"],
+        emerged_subtasks: [],
+        execution_evidence: {
+            files_changed: [],
+            test_results: { passed: 0, failed: 0, skipped: 0 },
+            success_criteria_met: ["<cr-XXXXXXXX or text>"],
+            success_criteria_remaining: ["<cr-XXXXXXXX or text>"],
+            progress_estimate: 0,
         },
-        discoveries: {
-            wrongAssumptions: [],
-            emergedWork: [],
-            facts: [],
-            newConstraints: [],
-        },
-        subGoalEvents: { completed: [], blocked: [], canceled: [] },
+        wrong_assumptions: [],
+        next_action: "<next concrete action, or empty when complete>",
+        completed_subtasks: ["<sg-XXXXXXXX or text>"],
+        blocked_subtasks: ["<sg-XXXXXXXX or text>"],
+        canceled_subtasks: ["<sg-XXXXXXXX or text>"],
     };
+    // v2.12: Declarative tri-state outcome (L1/L2 only — keeps L0 retry lean)
+    if (declareOutcome) {
+        evalObj.outcome = "<success|partial|failed|blocked>";
+        evalObj.blocker = "<required only when outcome=blocked>";
+        evalObj.retroactiveClaims = [];
+    }
     // v2.8: Inject drift clarification field when previous round had drift flags
     if (needsClarification) {
         const flagTypes = [
             hasIntentDrift ? "intent_drift" : "",
             hasSubGoalDrift ? "subgoal_drift" : "",
         ].filter(Boolean).join(" / ");
-        report.discoveries = {
-            ...report.discoveries,
-            facts: [`Explain the evidence-backed pivot from ${flagTypes}`],
-        };
-        report.driftClarification = {
-            explanation: "<explain why the current evidence requires this pivot>",
-            anchors: ["<criterion ID, constraint ID, or observed file path>"],
-        };
+        evalObj.drift_clarification =
+            `<explain why your Round ${round} actions diverged from your stated plan ` +
+                `(${flagTypes} detected in previous round). ` +
+                `Leave empty if no divergence occurred>`;
     }
     const lines = [
         "### LoopForge Evaluation (Required)",
@@ -656,13 +1060,14 @@ export function buildRoundReportBlock(round, prevDriftFlags) {
         "with your actual results and submit via `loopforge_next`.",
     ];
     if (needsClarification) {
-        lines.push("", "> ⚠️ **Drift Detected:** The verification gate detected that your previous", "> round's previously suggested action did not match your actual output.", "> Explain the evidence-backed pivot in `driftClarification` below and include a runtime-verifiable anchor.", "> An honest explanation helps the enforcement gate distinguish intentional", "> course corrections from unacknowledged drift.");
+        lines.push("", "> ⚠️ **Drift Detected:** The verification gate detected that your previous", "> round's declared intent (next_action) did not match your actual output.", "> Please explain the pivot in the `drift_clarification` field below.", "> An honest explanation helps the enforcement gate distinguish intentional", "> course corrections from unacknowledged drift.");
     }
-    lines.push("Submit this object in the `report` parameter:");
-    lines.push(JSON.stringify(report, null, 2));
+    lines.push("---loopforge-eval");
+    lines.push(JSON.stringify(evalObj, null, 2));
+    lines.push("---end-loopforge-eval");
     lines.push("");
     lines.push("IMPORTANT: Replace every <placeholder> with your actual data.");
-    lines.push("Set outcome=success only when every criterion has runtime-verifiable evidence; set continuation=stop only when no further round is requested.");
+    lines.push("Set success=true only when the full goal and ALL hard constraints are verified.");
     lines.push("Use IDs for exact matching: c-XXXXXXXX, cr-XXXXXXXX, sg-XXXXXXXX.");
     lines.push("For subtasks, use sub-goal IDs from the Sub-Goal Dashboard above.");
     return lines.join("\n");
@@ -674,10 +1079,14 @@ export function compileLoop(request, context) {
     const decision = levelDecision(request, context);
     const previous = getPreviousRound(request.loop_id, request.round - 1, context);
     const objective = evolveObjective(request, context);
-    const constraints = evolveConstraints(request, objective, previous);
-    const constraintLifecycle = manageConstraintLifecycle(constraints.active, objective, request.constraints_from_plan, context, request.round);
-    const rolling = buildRollingSummary(request.loop_id, request.round, context);
-    const subGoals = deriveSubGoals(request.loop_id, request.round, request.last_round_view, context, entryProjection);
+    const constraints = evolveConstraints(request, objective, previous, context);
+    const constraintLifecycle = manageConstraintLifecycle(constraints.active, objective, request.constraints_from_plan, context, request.round, request.last_round_result?.constraint_violations ?? []);
+    const rolling = buildRollingSummary(request.loop_id, request.round, context, 0, decision.level);
+    const subGoals = manageSubGoals(request.loop_id, request.round, request.last_round_result, context);
+    // v3.2: Goal → criteria → evidence vertical view (derived, zero persistence).
+    const criterionStatuses = deriveCriterionStatuses(request.loop_id, context, objective, request.round, subGoals, request.last_round_result);
+    // v3.2: Lessons learned — repeated violations / verification failures.
+    const lessons = deriveLessons(request.loop_id, context, request.round);
     const alignment = alignTask(request.task, request, context);
     const health = checkLoopHealth(request.loop_id, { ...request, loop_objective: objective }, context);
     const warnings = unique([
@@ -697,35 +1106,13 @@ export function compileLoop(request, context) {
         .filter((e) => entryRound(e) >= 1 && entryRound(e) < request.round);
     const trend = [];
     for (const entry of completedEntries.slice(-10)) {
-        const viols = entryProjection(entry)?.violations ?? [];
+        const viols = Array.isArray(entry.constraint_violations)
+            ? entry.constraint_violations.filter((v) => typeof v === "string")
+            : [];
         // Simple proxy: no violations = perfect trust, each violation = -0.1
         const score = Math.max(0, 1.0 - viols.length * 0.1);
         trend.push(Number(score.toFixed(2)));
     }
-    const verified = verifiedClaims(request.loop_id, context);
-    const latestReport = [...loopEntries(request.loop_id, context)].reverse()
-        .map((entry) => parseRoundReport(entry.round_report))
-        .find((report) => report !== null);
-    const audit = auditEntries(request.loop_id, loopEntries(request.loop_id, context));
-    const regressionObligations = audit.regressionObligations.map((obligation) => ({
-        id: obligation.id,
-        description: `Re-run ${obligation.check}`,
-        sourceRound: obligation.sourceRound,
-        evidenceRefs: [`check:${obligation.check}`],
-        status: obligation.status,
-    }));
-    const latestBlocker = latestReport?.outcome === "blocked" && latestReport.blocker;
-    const blockerGate = latestBlocker
-        ? latestBlocker.action
-            ? deriveStructuredGate(latestBlocker.action)
-            : deriveGate(latestBlocker.reason, latestBlocker.references)
-        : null;
-    const activeBlockers = latestBlocker && blockerGate?.gate.kind === "user" &&
-        !audit.unresolvedUserGates.includes(blockerGate.id)
-        ? []
-        : latestBlocker
-            ? [latestBlocker.reason]
-            : [];
     const response = makeLoopCompileResponse({
         status: AgentStatus.OK,
         recompile_level: decision.level,
@@ -744,20 +1131,12 @@ export function compileLoop(request, context) {
         task_alignment: alignment,
         rolling_summary: rolling,
         sub_goals: subGoals,
+        criterion_statuses: criterionStatuses,
+        lessons,
         agent_trust_score: request.round > 1 ? Number(trustScore.toFixed(2)) : undefined,
         agent_trust_trend: request.round > 1 ? trend : [],
-        // Agent intent is advisory only. Runtime suggestions are derived from
-        // remaining criteria, active sub-goals and blockers; never copy intent
-        // into the canonical next-action projection.
-        projection: makeLoopCompileProjection({
-            suggestedNextAction: request.last_round_view?.evidence?.criteriaRemaining?.[0] ||
-                request.last_round_view?.discoveries?.emergedWork?.[0] || "",
-            verifiedFacts: verified.facts,
-            verifiedEvidenceRefs: verified.refs,
-            regressionObligations,
-            discoveredFacts: latestReport?.discoveries?.facts ?? [],
-            activeBlockers,
-        }),
+        suggested_next_task: request.last_round_result?.next_action?.trim() ||
+            request.last_round_result?.emerged_subtasks?.[0] || "",
         plan_source: request.plan_source,
         warnings,
     });
@@ -787,36 +1166,16 @@ export function compileLoop(request, context) {
             l2: adaptiveL2,
         },
         attempt: request.attempt,
-        roundReportBlock: buildRoundReportBlock(request.round, request.verification_flags),
+        selfEvaluationBlock: buildSelfEvalBlock(request.round, request.verification_flags, decision.level),
         fullStateMarkdown: l2Pointer ? undefined : markdown,
-        agentIntent: request.last_round_view?.agentIntent,
-        promptRequests: request.last_round_view?.contextRequest ?? undefined,
-    });
-    const priorEntries = loopEntries(request.loop_id, context)
-        .filter((entry) => entryRound(entry) < request.round);
-    const previousL2 = [...priorEntries].reverse()
-        .find((entry) => lineage(entry).recompile_level === "l2");
-    artifact.lastL2Round = artifact.level === "l2"
-        ? request.round
-        : previousL2 ? entryRound(previousL2) : 0;
-    const meaningfulEntry = [...priorEntries].reverse().find((entry) => {
-        const data = lineage(entry);
-        const evidence = entryProjection(entry)?.evidence;
-        return Boolean(entryCriteriaMet(entry).length ||
-            evidence?.observedFiles.length ||
-            entryProjection(entry)?.discoveries?.newConstraints.length ||
-            entryProjection(entry)?.discoveries?.emergedWork.length);
+        // v2.9: Model's information needs from the previous round's SelfEvaluation
+        promptRequests: request.last_round_result?.prompt_requests,
+        // v3.2: Previous L1 presentation as the collapse diff baseline.
+        presentedBaseline: readPresentedBaseline(request.loop_id, request.round, context),
     });
-    artifact.lastMeaningfulProgressRound = meaningfulEntry
-        ? entryRound(meaningfulEntry)
-        : request.round <= 1 ? 0 : 1;
-    artifact.stateAgeRounds = artifact.lastMeaningfulProgressRound > 0
-        ? Math.max(0, request.round - artifact.lastMeaningfulProgressRound)
-        : request.round - 1;
     response.prompt = artifact.renderedPrompt;
     response.prompt_artifact = artifact;
     response.state_file_content = policy.state_file.enabled ? markdown : undefined;
-    response.canonical_state = state;
     return response;
 }
 //# sourceMappingURL=loop-compiler.js.map