loopctl-mcp-server 2.25.0 → 2.27.0

package/index.js

@@ -1027,9 +1027,9 @@ async function knowledgeBulkDelete({
 
 async function knowledgeDrafts({ limit, offset, project_id }) {
   const params = new URLSearchParams();
-  // Pass `limit` through verbatim (like knowledge_list/index/search) so the
-  // server honors it up to its max page size and returns 400 above it — rather
-  // than silently clamping client-side, which would truncate draft enumeration.
+  // Pass `limit` through verbatim (like knowledge_list/index/search) so the server
+  // honors it up to its max page size, clamping above it server-side rather than
+  // silently clamping client-side (which would truncate draft enumeration).
   if (limit != null) params.set("limit", String(limit));
   if (offset != null) params.set("offset", String(offset));
   if (project_id) params.set("project_id", project_id);
@@ -1038,6 +1038,41 @@ async function knowledgeDrafts({ limit, offset, project_id }) {
   return toContent(result);
 }
 
+async function knowledgeConflicts({ limit, offset }) {
+  const params = new URLSearchParams();
+  if (limit != null) params.set("limit", String(limit));
+  if (offset != null) params.set("offset", String(offset));
+  const qs = params.toString();
+  const path = qs
+    ? `/api/v1/knowledge/conflicts?${qs}`
+    : "/api/v1/knowledge/conflicts";
+  const result = await apiCall("GET", path, null, process.env.LOOPCTL_AGENT_KEY);
+  return toContent(result);
+}
+
+async function knowledgeResolveConflict({
+  source_article_id,
+  target_article_id,
+  disposition,
+  authoritative_article_id,
+  classification,
+  evidence,
+  confidence,
+}) {
+  const payload = { source_article_id, target_article_id, disposition };
+  if (authoritative_article_id) payload.authoritative_article_id = authoritative_article_id;
+  if (classification) payload.classification = classification;
+  if (evidence) payload.evidence = evidence;
+  if (confidence) payload.confidence = confidence;
+  const result = await apiCall(
+    "POST",
+    "/api/v1/knowledge/conflicts/resolve",
+    payload,
+    process.env.LOOPCTL_AGENT_KEY,
+  );
+  return toContent(result);
+}
+
 async function knowledgeLint({ project_id, stale_days, min_coverage, max_per_category }) {
   const params = new URLSearchParams();
   if (stale_days != null) params.set("stale_days", String(stale_days));
@@ -2852,8 +2887,8 @@ const TOOLS = [
     description:
       "List draft (unpublished) knowledge articles. Requires orchestrator role. " +
       "Returns paginated drafts with total_count in meta. Paginate via offset/limit " +
-      "(limit honored up to 1000; a limit above the max is rejected with 400, not " +
-      "silently clamped).",
+      "(limit honored up to 1000; a limit above the max is clamped to the maximum, " +
+      "never rejected, so pagination stays complete).",
     inputSchema: {
       type: "object",
       properties: {
@@ -2861,7 +2896,7 @@ const TOOLS = [
           type: "integer",
           description:
             "Max drafts per page (default 20, max 1000). A limit above the max is " +
-            "rejected with 400 — not silently clamped — so offset pagination stays complete.",
+            "clamped to the maximum — never rejected — so offset pagination stays complete.",
           default: 20,
           minimum: 1,
           maximum: 1000,
@@ -2880,6 +2915,102 @@ const TOOLS = [
       required: [],
     },
   },
+  {
+    name: "knowledge_conflicts",
+    description:
+      "List potential-conflict article pairs — published articles flagged 'too similar " +
+      "to comfortably coexist' by the auto-linker / nightly lint sweep, highest-overlap " +
+      "first. The KB only FLAGS the pair (via a mechanical similarity threshold); it does " +
+      "NOT decide whether it's a redundancy to merge or a real contradiction — that's your " +
+      "call, with the live context. Each entry has the two articles (id/title/status/" +
+      "category) and their similarity. Read both, then merge (supersede one, knowledge_create " +
+      "the merged article, or PATCH) or, if they genuinely disagree, reconcile. Paginated " +
+      "with total_count in meta. Agent role.",
+    inputSchema: {
+      type: "object",
+      properties: {
+        limit: {
+          type: "integer",
+          description:
+            "Max pairs per page (default 50, max 1000). A limit above the max is clamped " +
+            "to the maximum — never rejected — so offset pagination stays complete.",
+          default: 50,
+          minimum: 1,
+          maximum: 1000,
+        },
+        offset: {
+          type: "integer",
+          description: "Pagination offset. Default 0.",
+          default: 0,
+          minimum: 0,
+        },
+      },
+      required: [],
+    },
+  },
+  {
+    name: "knowledge_resolve_conflict",
+    description:
+      "Record YOUR verdict on a potential-conflict pair (from knowledge_conflicts or an " +
+      "article's potential_conflicts). You have the live context the KB lacks — it never " +
+      "re-judges, it acts on what you record. Dispositions: 'dismiss' (a false positive — " +
+      "the two don't actually conflict; drops out of the queue immediately); 'supersede' " +
+      "(one article wins — pass authoritative_article_id, the winner; the nightly executor " +
+      "creates a supersedes link and retires the loser, but ONLY at confidence:\"high\" — " +
+      "reversible and audited); 'merge' (recorded for the later merge step). Non-destructive " +
+      "at agent role — you record intent; the privileged nightly job executes it. " +
+      "Last-write-wins per pair, so re-recording with fresher ground truth overrides. " +
+      "Resolve only conflicts material to your current task; adjudicate against the actual " +
+      "system, and if you can't tell which is right, leave it (or record low confidence) " +
+      "rather than guessing.",
+    inputSchema: {
+      type: "object",
+      properties: {
+        source_article_id: {
+          type: "string",
+          description: "One article of the conflict pair (UUID). Order does not matter.",
+        },
+        target_article_id: {
+          type: "string",
+          description: "The other article of the conflict pair (UUID).",
+        },
+        disposition: {
+          type: "string",
+          enum: ["dismiss", "supersede", "merge"],
+          description:
+            "dismiss = false positive; supersede = one wins (set authoritative_article_id); " +
+            "merge = combine (recorded for the later merge step).",
+        },
+        authoritative_article_id: {
+          type: "string",
+          description:
+            "For supersede/merge: the WINNING article (must be one of the pair). The other " +
+            "is the loser to retire/merge into the winner.",
+        },
+        classification: {
+          type: "string",
+          enum: ["redundant", "complementary", "contradictory"],
+          description:
+            "Your judgment of the relationship: redundant (same claim), complementary (same " +
+            "topic, different facets — usually a dismiss), or contradictory (can't both be true).",
+        },
+        evidence: {
+          type: "string",
+          description:
+            "Why you're sure — ideally a ground-truth reference (commit, file:line, URL, or the " +
+            "observed behavior). Recorded for audit and for a human reviewing low-confidence calls.",
+        },
+        confidence: {
+          type: "string",
+          enum: ["high", "medium", "low"],
+          description:
+            "high, medium, or low. supersede auto-executes only at 'high'; lower confidence is " +
+            "recorded but left for review. Default medium.",
+        },
+      },
+      required: ["source_article_id", "target_article_id", "disposition"],
+    },
+  },
   {
     name: "knowledge_lint",
     description:
@@ -3500,6 +3631,12 @@ server.setRequestHandler(CallToolRequestSchema, async (request) => {
     case "knowledge_drafts":
       return await knowledgeDrafts(args);
 
+    case "knowledge_conflicts":
+      return await knowledgeConflicts(args);
+
+    case "knowledge_resolve_conflict":
+      return await knowledgeResolveConflict(args);
+
     case "knowledge_lint":
       return await knowledgeLint(args);
 

package/package.json

@@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
 {
   "name": "loopctl-mcp-server",
-  "version": "2.25.0",
+  "version": "2.27.0",
   "description": "MCP server for loopctl — structural trust for AI development loops",
   "type": "module",
   "main": "index.js",