loki-mode 4.2.0
This diff represents the content of publicly available package versions that have been released to one of the supported registries. The information contained in this diff is provided for informational purposes only and reflects changes between package versions as they appear in their respective public registries.
- package/LICENSE +21 -0
- package/README.md +691 -0
- package/SKILL.md +191 -0
- package/VERSION +1 -0
- package/autonomy/.loki/dashboard/index.html +2634 -0
- package/autonomy/CONSTITUTION.md +508 -0
- package/autonomy/README.md +201 -0
- package/autonomy/config.example.yaml +152 -0
- package/autonomy/loki +526 -0
- package/autonomy/run.sh +3636 -0
- package/bin/loki-mode.js +26 -0
- package/bin/postinstall.js +60 -0
- package/docs/ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS.md +234 -0
- package/docs/COMPARISON.md +325 -0
- package/docs/COMPETITIVE-ANALYSIS.md +333 -0
- package/docs/INSTALLATION.md +547 -0
- package/docs/auto-claude-comparison.md +276 -0
- package/docs/cursor-comparison.md +225 -0
- package/docs/dashboard-guide.md +355 -0
- package/docs/screenshots/README.md +149 -0
- package/docs/screenshots/dashboard-agents.png +0 -0
- package/docs/screenshots/dashboard-tasks.png +0 -0
- package/docs/thick2thin.md +173 -0
- package/package.json +48 -0
- package/references/advanced-patterns.md +453 -0
- package/references/agent-types.md +243 -0
- package/references/agents.md +1043 -0
- package/references/business-ops.md +550 -0
- package/references/competitive-analysis.md +216 -0
- package/references/confidence-routing.md +371 -0
- package/references/core-workflow.md +275 -0
- package/references/cursor-learnings.md +207 -0
- package/references/deployment.md +604 -0
- package/references/lab-research-patterns.md +534 -0
- package/references/mcp-integration.md +186 -0
- package/references/memory-system.md +467 -0
- package/references/openai-patterns.md +647 -0
- package/references/production-patterns.md +568 -0
- package/references/prompt-repetition.md +192 -0
- package/references/quality-control.md +437 -0
- package/references/sdlc-phases.md +410 -0
- package/references/task-queue.md +361 -0
- package/references/tool-orchestration.md +691 -0
- package/skills/00-index.md +120 -0
- package/skills/agents.md +249 -0
- package/skills/artifacts.md +174 -0
- package/skills/github-integration.md +218 -0
- package/skills/model-selection.md +125 -0
- package/skills/parallel-workflows.md +526 -0
- package/skills/patterns-advanced.md +188 -0
- package/skills/production.md +292 -0
- package/skills/quality-gates.md +180 -0
- package/skills/testing.md +149 -0
- package/skills/troubleshooting.md +109 -0
|
@@ -0,0 +1,120 @@
|
|
|
1
|
+
# Skill Modules Index
|
|
2
|
+
|
|
3
|
+
**Load 1-3 modules based on your current task. Do not load all modules.**
|
|
4
|
+
|
|
5
|
+
> **Full documentation:** For comprehensive details, see `references/` directory:
|
|
6
|
+
> - `references/agents.md` - Complete 37 agent type specifications
|
|
7
|
+
> - `references/openai-patterns.md` - OpenAI Agents SDK patterns
|
|
8
|
+
> - `references/lab-research-patterns.md` - DeepMind + Anthropic research
|
|
9
|
+
> - `references/production-patterns.md` - HN 2025 production insights
|
|
10
|
+
> - `references/memory-system.md` - Episodic/semantic/procedural memory
|
|
11
|
+
> - `references/tool-orchestration.md` - NVIDIA ToolOrchestra efficiency metrics
|
|
12
|
+
> - `references/quality-control.md` - Code review and guardrails
|
|
13
|
+
|
|
14
|
+
## Module Selection Rules
|
|
15
|
+
|
|
16
|
+
| If your task involves... | Load these modules |
|
|
17
|
+
|--------------------------|-------------------|
|
|
18
|
+
| Writing code, implementing features | `model-selection.md` |
|
|
19
|
+
| Running tests, E2E, Playwright | `testing.md` |
|
|
20
|
+
| Code review, quality checks | `quality-gates.md` |
|
|
21
|
+
| Deployment, CI/CD, infrastructure | `production.md` |
|
|
22
|
+
| Debugging, errors, failures | `troubleshooting.md` |
|
|
23
|
+
| Spawning subagents, Task tool | `model-selection.md`, `agents.md` |
|
|
24
|
+
| Architecture, design decisions | `patterns-advanced.md` |
|
|
25
|
+
| Generating artifacts, reports | `artifacts.md` |
|
|
26
|
+
| Parallel features, git worktrees | `parallel-workflows.md` |
|
|
27
|
+
| Scale patterns (50+ agents) | `parallel-workflows.md` + `references/cursor-learnings.md` |
|
|
28
|
+
| GitHub issues, PRs, syncing | `github-integration.md` |
|
|
29
|
+
|
|
30
|
+
## Module Descriptions
|
|
31
|
+
|
|
32
|
+
### model-selection.md
|
|
33
|
+
**When:** Spawning subagents, choosing models, parallelization
|
|
34
|
+
- Task tool parameters and examples
|
|
35
|
+
- Opus/Sonnet/Haiku usage patterns
|
|
36
|
+
- Extended thinking mode prefixes
|
|
37
|
+
- Prompt repetition for Haiku
|
|
38
|
+
- Background agents and resumption
|
|
39
|
+
|
|
40
|
+
### quality-gates.md
|
|
41
|
+
**When:** Code review, pre-commit checks, quality assurance
|
|
42
|
+
- 7-gate quality system
|
|
43
|
+
- Blind review + anti-sycophancy
|
|
44
|
+
- Velocity-quality feedback loop (arXiv research)
|
|
45
|
+
- Mandatory quality checks per task
|
|
46
|
+
- Guardrails (input/output validation)
|
|
47
|
+
|
|
48
|
+
### patterns-advanced.md
|
|
49
|
+
**When:** Architecture decisions, complex problem-solving
|
|
50
|
+
- OptiMind problem classification + expert hints
|
|
51
|
+
- Ensemble solution generation
|
|
52
|
+
- Formal state machines (k8s-valkey-operator)
|
|
53
|
+
- Constitutional AI self-critique
|
|
54
|
+
- Debate-based verification (DeepMind)
|
|
55
|
+
|
|
56
|
+
### testing.md
|
|
57
|
+
**When:** Writing tests, E2E automation, verification
|
|
58
|
+
- Playwright MCP for browser testing
|
|
59
|
+
- Property-based testing (Kiro pattern)
|
|
60
|
+
- Unit/integration/E2E strategies
|
|
61
|
+
- Visual design input workflow
|
|
62
|
+
|
|
63
|
+
### production.md
|
|
64
|
+
**When:** Deployment, CI/CD, production concerns
|
|
65
|
+
- HN 2025 production patterns
|
|
66
|
+
- Narrow scope, confidence-based routing
|
|
67
|
+
- Git worktree isolation (Cursor pattern)
|
|
68
|
+
- Atomic checkpoint/rollback
|
|
69
|
+
- CI/CD automation (Zencoder patterns)
|
|
70
|
+
- Context engineering and proactive compaction
|
|
71
|
+
|
|
72
|
+
### troubleshooting.md
|
|
73
|
+
**When:** Errors, failures, debugging
|
|
74
|
+
- Common issues and solutions
|
|
75
|
+
- Red flags (never do these)
|
|
76
|
+
- Multi-tiered fallback system
|
|
77
|
+
- Rate limit handling
|
|
78
|
+
- Circuit breakers
|
|
79
|
+
|
|
80
|
+
### agents.md
|
|
81
|
+
**When:** Understanding agent types, structured prompting
|
|
82
|
+
- 37 agent type overview
|
|
83
|
+
- Structured prompting format (GOAL/CONSTRAINTS/CONTEXT/OUTPUT)
|
|
84
|
+
- Agent handoffs and callbacks
|
|
85
|
+
- Routing mode optimization
|
|
86
|
+
|
|
87
|
+
### artifacts.md
|
|
88
|
+
**When:** Generating reports, documentation, screenshots
|
|
89
|
+
- Artifact generation (Antigravity pattern)
|
|
90
|
+
- Code transformation (Amazon Q pattern)
|
|
91
|
+
- Phase completion reports
|
|
92
|
+
- Screenshot gallery generation
|
|
93
|
+
|
|
94
|
+
### parallel-workflows.md
|
|
95
|
+
**When:** Running multiple features in parallel, worktree orchestration
|
|
96
|
+
- Git worktree-based isolation
|
|
97
|
+
- Parallel Claude sessions (feature, testing, docs streams)
|
|
98
|
+
- Inter-stream communication via signals
|
|
99
|
+
- Auto-merge completed features
|
|
100
|
+
- Orchestrator state management
|
|
101
|
+
|
|
102
|
+
### github-integration.md (v4.1.0)
|
|
103
|
+
**When:** Working with GitHub issues, creating PRs, syncing status
|
|
104
|
+
- Import open issues as pending tasks
|
|
105
|
+
- Create PRs on feature completion
|
|
106
|
+
- Sync task status back to GitHub issues
|
|
107
|
+
- Filter by labels, milestone, assignee
|
|
108
|
+
- Requires `gh` CLI authenticated
|
|
109
|
+
|
|
110
|
+
## How to Load
|
|
111
|
+
|
|
112
|
+
```python
|
|
113
|
+
# Example: Before implementing a feature with tests
|
|
114
|
+
# 1. Read this index
|
|
115
|
+
# 2. Decide: need model-selection.md + testing.md
|
|
116
|
+
# 3. Read those files
|
|
117
|
+
# 4. Execute with loaded context
|
|
118
|
+
```
|
|
119
|
+
|
|
120
|
+
**Remember:** Loading fewer modules = more context for actual work.
|
package/skills/agents.md
ADDED
|
@@ -0,0 +1,249 @@
|
|
|
1
|
+
# Agent Dispatch & Structured Prompting
|
|
2
|
+
|
|
3
|
+
> **Full agent type definitions:** See `references/agents.md` for complete 37 agent role specifications across 7 swarms (Engineering, Operations, Business, Data, Product, Growth, Review).
|
|
4
|
+
|
|
5
|
+
---
|
|
6
|
+
|
|
7
|
+
## How Agents Actually Work
|
|
8
|
+
|
|
9
|
+
**Claude Code's Task tool has these subagent_types:**
|
|
10
|
+
- `general-purpose` - Most work (implementation, review, testing)
|
|
11
|
+
- `Explore` - Codebase exploration and search
|
|
12
|
+
- `Plan` - Architecture and planning
|
|
13
|
+
- `Bash` - Command execution
|
|
14
|
+
- `platform-orchestrator` - Deployment and service management
|
|
15
|
+
|
|
16
|
+
**The 37 agent types are ROLES defined through prompts.** Create specialized behavior:
|
|
17
|
+
|
|
18
|
+
```python
|
|
19
|
+
# Security reviewer = general-purpose + security-focused prompt
|
|
20
|
+
Task(
|
|
21
|
+
subagent_type="general-purpose",
|
|
22
|
+
model="opus",
|
|
23
|
+
description="Security review: auth module",
|
|
24
|
+
prompt="""You are a security reviewer. Focus on:
|
|
25
|
+
- Authentication vulnerabilities
|
|
26
|
+
- Input validation gaps
|
|
27
|
+
- OWASP Top 10 issues
|
|
28
|
+
Review: src/auth/*.ts"""
|
|
29
|
+
)
|
|
30
|
+
|
|
31
|
+
# Frontend agent = general-purpose + frontend-focused prompt
|
|
32
|
+
Task(
|
|
33
|
+
subagent_type="general-purpose",
|
|
34
|
+
model="opus",
|
|
35
|
+
description="Implement login form",
|
|
36
|
+
prompt="""You are a frontend developer. Implement:
|
|
37
|
+
- React login form component
|
|
38
|
+
- Form validation
|
|
39
|
+
- Error state handling"""
|
|
40
|
+
)
|
|
41
|
+
```
|
|
42
|
+
|
|
43
|
+
---
|
|
44
|
+
|
|
45
|
+
## Structured Prompting Template
|
|
46
|
+
|
|
47
|
+
**Every Task dispatch MUST include these sections:**
|
|
48
|
+
|
|
49
|
+
```
|
|
50
|
+
## GOAL
|
|
51
|
+
[What success looks like - measurable outcome]
|
|
52
|
+
|
|
53
|
+
## CONSTRAINTS
|
|
54
|
+
[Hard limits - what you cannot do]
|
|
55
|
+
|
|
56
|
+
## CONTEXT
|
|
57
|
+
[Files to read, previous attempts, related decisions]
|
|
58
|
+
|
|
59
|
+
## OUTPUT
|
|
60
|
+
[Exact deliverables expected]
|
|
61
|
+
```
|
|
62
|
+
|
|
63
|
+
**Example:**
|
|
64
|
+
```python
|
|
65
|
+
Task(
|
|
66
|
+
subagent_type="general-purpose",
|
|
67
|
+
model="opus",
|
|
68
|
+
description="Implement user registration API",
|
|
69
|
+
prompt="""
|
|
70
|
+
## GOAL
|
|
71
|
+
Create POST /api/users endpoint that registers new users.
|
|
72
|
+
Success: Endpoint works, tests pass, matches OpenAPI spec.
|
|
73
|
+
|
|
74
|
+
## CONSTRAINTS
|
|
75
|
+
- Use bcrypt for password hashing (already in dependencies)
|
|
76
|
+
- No new dependencies without approval
|
|
77
|
+
- Response time < 200ms
|
|
78
|
+
|
|
79
|
+
## CONTEXT
|
|
80
|
+
- Existing auth pattern: src/auth/login.ts
|
|
81
|
+
- OpenAPI spec: .loki/specs/openapi.yaml
|
|
82
|
+
- User model: src/models/user.ts
|
|
83
|
+
|
|
84
|
+
## OUTPUT
|
|
85
|
+
- [ ] Endpoint implementation in src/routes/users.ts
|
|
86
|
+
- [ ] Unit tests in tests/users.test.ts
|
|
87
|
+
- [ ] Integration test in tests/integration/users.test.ts
|
|
88
|
+
"""
|
|
89
|
+
)
|
|
90
|
+
```
|
|
91
|
+
|
|
92
|
+
---
|
|
93
|
+
|
|
94
|
+
## Parallel Review Pattern
|
|
95
|
+
|
|
96
|
+
**Code review uses 3 parallel reviewers with different focus areas:**
|
|
97
|
+
|
|
98
|
+
```python
|
|
99
|
+
# Launch all 3 in ONE message (parallel execution)
|
|
100
|
+
Task(
|
|
101
|
+
subagent_type="general-purpose",
|
|
102
|
+
model="opus",
|
|
103
|
+
description="Review: correctness",
|
|
104
|
+
prompt="Review for bugs, logic errors, edge cases. Files: {files}"
|
|
105
|
+
)
|
|
106
|
+
Task(
|
|
107
|
+
subagent_type="general-purpose",
|
|
108
|
+
model="opus",
|
|
109
|
+
description="Review: security",
|
|
110
|
+
prompt="Review for vulnerabilities, injection, auth issues. Files: {files}"
|
|
111
|
+
)
|
|
112
|
+
Task(
|
|
113
|
+
subagent_type="general-purpose",
|
|
114
|
+
model="opus",
|
|
115
|
+
description="Review: performance",
|
|
116
|
+
prompt="Review for N+1 queries, memory leaks, slow operations. Files: {files}"
|
|
117
|
+
)
|
|
118
|
+
```
|
|
119
|
+
|
|
120
|
+
**Rules:**
|
|
121
|
+
- ALWAYS use opus for reviews
|
|
122
|
+
- ALWAYS launch all 3 in single message
|
|
123
|
+
- WAIT for all 3 before aggregating
|
|
124
|
+
- IF unanimous approval: run Devil's Advocate reviewer
|
|
125
|
+
|
|
126
|
+
---
|
|
127
|
+
|
|
128
|
+
## Confidence-Based Routing
|
|
129
|
+
|
|
130
|
+
| Confidence | Dispatch Strategy |
|
|
131
|
+
|------------|-------------------|
|
|
132
|
+
| >= 0.95 | Direct haiku execution, no review |
|
|
133
|
+
| 0.70-0.95 | Direct execution + async review |
|
|
134
|
+
| 0.40-0.70 | Supervisor orchestration, mandatory review |
|
|
135
|
+
| < 0.40 | Flag for human decision |
|
|
136
|
+
|
|
137
|
+
**Confidence factors:**
|
|
138
|
+
- Requirement clarity (30%)
|
|
139
|
+
- Similar past successes (20%)
|
|
140
|
+
- Technical complexity match (25%)
|
|
141
|
+
- Resource availability (15%)
|
|
142
|
+
- Time pressure (10%)
|
|
143
|
+
|
|
144
|
+
---
|
|
145
|
+
|
|
146
|
+
## Agent Handoffs
|
|
147
|
+
|
|
148
|
+
When one agent completes and hands off to another:
|
|
149
|
+
|
|
150
|
+
```python
|
|
151
|
+
# Agent A completes, hands off to Agent B
|
|
152
|
+
handoff_data = {
|
|
153
|
+
"completed_work": "Implemented user registration endpoint",
|
|
154
|
+
"files_modified": ["src/routes/users.ts", "tests/users.test.ts"],
|
|
155
|
+
"decisions_made": ["Used bcrypt, not argon2", "Email validation via regex"],
|
|
156
|
+
"open_questions": ["Rate limiting not implemented yet"],
|
|
157
|
+
"mistakes_learned": ["First attempt had SQL injection - fixed"]
|
|
158
|
+
}
|
|
159
|
+
|
|
160
|
+
Task(
|
|
161
|
+
subagent_type="general-purpose",
|
|
162
|
+
model="sonnet",
|
|
163
|
+
description="Integration testing for user registration",
|
|
164
|
+
prompt=f"Previous agent completed: {handoff_data}. Now write integration tests..."
|
|
165
|
+
)
|
|
166
|
+
```
|
|
167
|
+
|
|
168
|
+
---
|
|
169
|
+
|
|
170
|
+
## Project AGENTS.md
|
|
171
|
+
|
|
172
|
+
**IF target project has AGENTS.md, read it first.** (OpenAI/AAIF standard)
|
|
173
|
+
|
|
174
|
+
Priority order for context:
|
|
175
|
+
1. `AGENTS.md` in current directory
|
|
176
|
+
2. `CLAUDE.md` project instructions
|
|
177
|
+
3. `.loki/CONTINUITY.md` session state
|
|
178
|
+
|
|
179
|
+
---
|
|
180
|
+
|
|
181
|
+
## A2A-Inspired Communication (Google Protocol)
|
|
182
|
+
|
|
183
|
+
**Agent Cards for capability discovery:**
|
|
184
|
+
|
|
185
|
+
```json
|
|
186
|
+
{
|
|
187
|
+
"agent_id": "eng-backend-001",
|
|
188
|
+
"capabilities": ["api-endpoint", "auth", "database"],
|
|
189
|
+
"status": "available",
|
|
190
|
+
"current_task": null,
|
|
191
|
+
"inbox": ".loki/messages/inbox/eng-backend-001/",
|
|
192
|
+
"outbox": ".loki/messages/outbox/eng-backend-001/"
|
|
193
|
+
}
|
|
194
|
+
```
|
|
195
|
+
|
|
196
|
+
**Handoff message format:**
|
|
197
|
+
|
|
198
|
+
```json
|
|
199
|
+
{
|
|
200
|
+
"from": "eng-backend-001",
|
|
201
|
+
"to": "eng-qa-001",
|
|
202
|
+
"task_id": "task-123",
|
|
203
|
+
"type": "handoff",
|
|
204
|
+
"payload": {
|
|
205
|
+
"completed_work": "POST /api/users implemented",
|
|
206
|
+
"files_modified": ["src/routes/users.ts"],
|
|
207
|
+
"decisions": ["bcrypt for passwords"],
|
|
208
|
+
"artifacts": [".loki/artifacts/users-api-spec.json"]
|
|
209
|
+
}
|
|
210
|
+
}
|
|
211
|
+
```
|
|
212
|
+
|
|
213
|
+
**Location:** `.loki/messages/` directory structure
|
|
214
|
+
|
|
215
|
+
---
|
|
216
|
+
|
|
217
|
+
## Agentic Patterns Reference (awesome-agentic-patterns)
|
|
218
|
+
|
|
219
|
+
**Patterns used in Loki Mode:**
|
|
220
|
+
|
|
221
|
+
| Pattern | Implementation |
|
|
222
|
+
|---------|---------------|
|
|
223
|
+
| Sub-Agent Spawning | Task tool with focused prompts |
|
|
224
|
+
| Plan-Then-Execute | Architect -> Engineer workflow |
|
|
225
|
+
| Dual LLM | Opus for planning, Haiku for execution |
|
|
226
|
+
| CI Feedback Loop | Test results injected into retry prompts |
|
|
227
|
+
| Self-Critique | Constitutional AI revision cycle |
|
|
228
|
+
| Semantic Context Filtering | Only relevant files in context |
|
|
229
|
+
| Episodic Memory | `.loki/memory/episodic/` traces |
|
|
230
|
+
|
|
231
|
+
**Key insight (moridinamael.github.io):** Simple orchestration beats complex frameworks. "Ralph Wiggum Mode" - basic continuation prompts work better than elaborate coordination systems.
|
|
232
|
+
|
|
233
|
+
---
|
|
234
|
+
|
|
235
|
+
## The 37 Agent Roles
|
|
236
|
+
|
|
237
|
+
See `references/agents.md` for complete specifications. Summary:
|
|
238
|
+
|
|
239
|
+
| Swarm | Agent Types | Count |
|
|
240
|
+
|-------|-------------|-------|
|
|
241
|
+
| Engineering | frontend, backend, database, mobile, api, qa, perf, infra | 8 |
|
|
242
|
+
| Operations | devops, sre, security, monitor, incident, release, cost, compliance | 8 |
|
|
243
|
+
| Business | marketing, sales, finance, legal, support, hr, investor, partnerships | 8 |
|
|
244
|
+
| Data | ml, eng, analytics | 3 |
|
|
245
|
+
| Product | pm, design, techwriter | 3 |
|
|
246
|
+
| Growth | hacker, community, success, lifecycle | 4 |
|
|
247
|
+
| Review | code, business, security | 3 |
|
|
248
|
+
|
|
249
|
+
**Spawn only what you need.** Simple project: 5-10 agents. Complex startup: 100+.
|
|
@@ -0,0 +1,174 @@
|
|
|
1
|
+
# Artifact Generation & Code Transformation
|
|
2
|
+
|
|
3
|
+
## Artifact Generation (Antigravity Pattern)
|
|
4
|
+
|
|
5
|
+
**Auto-generate verifiable deliverables for audit trail without human intervention.**
|
|
6
|
+
|
|
7
|
+
```yaml
|
|
8
|
+
artifact_generation:
|
|
9
|
+
purpose: "Prove autonomous work without line-by-line code review"
|
|
10
|
+
location: ".loki/artifacts/{date}/{phase}/"
|
|
11
|
+
|
|
12
|
+
triggers:
|
|
13
|
+
on_phase_complete:
|
|
14
|
+
- verification_report: "Summary of tests passed, coverage, static analysis"
|
|
15
|
+
- architecture_diff: "Mermaid diagram showing changes from previous state"
|
|
16
|
+
- decision_log: "Key decisions made with rationale (from CONTINUITY.md)"
|
|
17
|
+
|
|
18
|
+
on_feature_complete:
|
|
19
|
+
- screenshot: "Key UI states captured via Playwright"
|
|
20
|
+
- api_diff: "OpenAPI spec changes highlighted"
|
|
21
|
+
- test_summary: "Unit, integration, E2E results"
|
|
22
|
+
|
|
23
|
+
on_deployment:
|
|
24
|
+
- release_notes: "Auto-generated from commit history"
|
|
25
|
+
- rollback_plan: "Steps to revert if issues detected"
|
|
26
|
+
- monitoring_baseline: "Expected metrics post-deploy"
|
|
27
|
+
```
|
|
28
|
+
|
|
29
|
+
---
|
|
30
|
+
|
|
31
|
+
## Artifact Types
|
|
32
|
+
|
|
33
|
+
### Verification Report
|
|
34
|
+
```yaml
|
|
35
|
+
format: "markdown"
|
|
36
|
+
contents:
|
|
37
|
+
- Phase name and duration
|
|
38
|
+
- Tasks completed (from queue)
|
|
39
|
+
- Quality gate results (7 gates)
|
|
40
|
+
- Coverage metrics
|
|
41
|
+
- Known issues / TODOs
|
|
42
|
+
```
|
|
43
|
+
|
|
44
|
+
### Architecture Diff
|
|
45
|
+
```yaml
|
|
46
|
+
format: "mermaid diagram"
|
|
47
|
+
contents:
|
|
48
|
+
- Components added/modified/removed
|
|
49
|
+
- Dependency changes
|
|
50
|
+
- Data flow changes
|
|
51
|
+
```
|
|
52
|
+
|
|
53
|
+
### Screenshot Gallery
|
|
54
|
+
```yaml
|
|
55
|
+
format: "png + markdown index"
|
|
56
|
+
capture:
|
|
57
|
+
- Critical user flows
|
|
58
|
+
- Error states
|
|
59
|
+
- Before/after comparisons
|
|
60
|
+
```
|
|
61
|
+
|
|
62
|
+
**Why artifacts matter for autonomous operation:**
|
|
63
|
+
- Creates audit trail without human during execution
|
|
64
|
+
- Enables async human review if needed later
|
|
65
|
+
- Proves work quality through outcomes, not code inspection
|
|
66
|
+
- Aligns with "outcome verification" over "line-by-line auditing"
|
|
67
|
+
|
|
68
|
+
---
|
|
69
|
+
|
|
70
|
+
## Code Transformation Agent (Amazon Q Pattern)
|
|
71
|
+
|
|
72
|
+
**Dedicated workflows for legacy modernization - narrow scope, deterministic verification.**
|
|
73
|
+
|
|
74
|
+
```yaml
|
|
75
|
+
transformation_agent:
|
|
76
|
+
purpose: "Autonomous code migration without human intervention"
|
|
77
|
+
trigger: "/transform or PRD mentions migration/upgrade/modernization"
|
|
78
|
+
|
|
79
|
+
workflows:
|
|
80
|
+
language_upgrade:
|
|
81
|
+
steps:
|
|
82
|
+
1. Analyze current version and dependencies
|
|
83
|
+
2. Identify deprecated APIs and breaking changes
|
|
84
|
+
3. Generate migration plan with risk assessment
|
|
85
|
+
4. Apply transformations incrementally
|
|
86
|
+
5. Run compatibility tests after each change
|
|
87
|
+
6. Validate performance benchmarks
|
|
88
|
+
examples:
|
|
89
|
+
- "Java 8 to Java 21"
|
|
90
|
+
- "Python 2 to Python 3"
|
|
91
|
+
- "Node 16 to Node 22"
|
|
92
|
+
|
|
93
|
+
database_migration:
|
|
94
|
+
steps:
|
|
95
|
+
1. Schema diff analysis (source vs target)
|
|
96
|
+
2. SQL dialect conversion rules
|
|
97
|
+
3. Data type mapping
|
|
98
|
+
4. Generate migration scripts
|
|
99
|
+
5. Run verification queries
|
|
100
|
+
6. Validate data integrity
|
|
101
|
+
examples:
|
|
102
|
+
- "Oracle to PostgreSQL"
|
|
103
|
+
- "MySQL to PostgreSQL"
|
|
104
|
+
- "MongoDB to PostgreSQL"
|
|
105
|
+
|
|
106
|
+
framework_modernization:
|
|
107
|
+
steps:
|
|
108
|
+
1. Dependency audit and compatibility matrix
|
|
109
|
+
2. Breaking change detection
|
|
110
|
+
3. Code pattern updates (deprecated -> modern)
|
|
111
|
+
4. Test suite adaptation
|
|
112
|
+
5. Performance regression testing
|
|
113
|
+
examples:
|
|
114
|
+
- "Angular to React"
|
|
115
|
+
- ".NET Framework to .NET Core"
|
|
116
|
+
- "Express to Fastify"
|
|
117
|
+
|
|
118
|
+
success_criteria:
|
|
119
|
+
- All existing tests pass
|
|
120
|
+
- No regression in performance (< 5% degradation)
|
|
121
|
+
- Static analysis clean
|
|
122
|
+
- API compatibility maintained (or documented breaks)
|
|
123
|
+
```
|
|
124
|
+
|
|
125
|
+
**Why this fits autonomous operation:**
|
|
126
|
+
- Narrow scope with clear boundaries
|
|
127
|
+
- Deterministic success criteria (tests pass, benchmarks met)
|
|
128
|
+
- No subjective judgment required
|
|
129
|
+
- High value, repetitive tasks
|
|
130
|
+
|
|
131
|
+
---
|
|
132
|
+
|
|
133
|
+
## Code-Only Agent Pattern (rijnard.com)
|
|
134
|
+
|
|
135
|
+
**Enforce execution through code, creating verifiable "code witnesses".**
|
|
136
|
+
|
|
137
|
+
```yaml
|
|
138
|
+
code_only_principle:
|
|
139
|
+
benefit: "Produces executable, verifiable behavior traces"
|
|
140
|
+
|
|
141
|
+
patterns:
|
|
142
|
+
- Return small outputs (<1KB) inline
|
|
143
|
+
- Write large results to JSON files with path references
|
|
144
|
+
- Use dynamic languages (Python, TypeScript) for native runtime injection
|
|
145
|
+
|
|
146
|
+
enforcement:
|
|
147
|
+
- Tool PreHooks to catch banned operations
|
|
148
|
+
- Initial prompting toward code-generation patterns
|
|
149
|
+
```
|
|
150
|
+
|
|
151
|
+
**Key Insight:** LLM outputs should be executable code, not prose descriptions. This creates an auditable trace of what actually happened.
|
|
152
|
+
|
|
153
|
+
---
|
|
154
|
+
|
|
155
|
+
## Release Notes Generation
|
|
156
|
+
|
|
157
|
+
**Auto-generate from commit history:**
|
|
158
|
+
|
|
159
|
+
```bash
|
|
160
|
+
# Generate release notes from git commits
|
|
161
|
+
git log --oneline v2.0.0..HEAD | \
|
|
162
|
+
grep -E "^[a-f0-9]+ (feat|fix|perf|refactor):" | \
|
|
163
|
+
sed 's/^[a-f0-9]* /- /'
|
|
164
|
+
```
|
|
165
|
+
|
|
166
|
+
```yaml
|
|
167
|
+
release_notes_template:
|
|
168
|
+
sections:
|
|
169
|
+
- "## New Features" (feat: commits)
|
|
170
|
+
- "## Bug Fixes" (fix: commits)
|
|
171
|
+
- "## Performance" (perf: commits)
|
|
172
|
+
- "## Breaking Changes" (BREAKING: in commit body)
|
|
173
|
+
- "## Migration Guide" (if breaking changes)
|
|
174
|
+
```
|