llm-relay 0.56.0 → 0.58.0

package/dist/candidates.d.ts

@@ -129,8 +129,8 @@ export interface Candidate {
     /**
      * What this deployment (or its provider, or its group) has STATED about itself — the learned
      * facts from `target-facts.ts`, each with the scope it applies at. The measurement kinds
-     * (`context-limit`, `rate-limit-rpm|rpd|tpm|tpd`) also carry `value`: the ceiling itself, as
-     * stated. Display-only — nothing here reorders or gates a candidate.
+     * (`context-limit`, `max-output`, `rate-limit-rpm|rpd|tpm|tpd`) also carry `value`: the ceiling
+     * itself, as stated. Display-only — nothing here reorders or gates a candidate.
      */
     facts: Array<{
         kind: string;

package/dist/cli.js

@@ -2230,6 +2230,7 @@ const FACT_MEANING = {
     "credential-invalid": "the provider says this key is bad — every deployment behind it demoted",
     "rate-limited": "throughput throttled by the provider — demoted, never evicted",
     "context-limit": "a ceiling this deployment stated about itself — a measurement, never a demotion",
+    "max-output": "a ceiling this deployment stated about itself — a measurement, never a demotion",
     "rate-limit-rpm": "a ceiling this deployment stated about itself — a measurement, never a demotion",
     "rate-limit-rpd": "a ceiling this deployment stated about itself — a measurement, never a demotion",
     "rate-limit-tpm": "a ceiling this deployment stated about itself — a measurement, never a demotion",
@@ -2431,10 +2432,11 @@ export function runEligibility(sub, arg) {
             if (sc.kind === "group") {
                 process.stdout.write(`      covers: ${sc.members.join(", ")}\n`);
             }
-            // ⚠ The full proposal travels — reset AND costClasses. This call once omitted `costClasses`,
-            // so the status listing printed an accept command WIDER than the proposal it echoed: the
-            // silent-widening hazard `eligibilityAcceptCommand`'s own comment warns about, surviving in
-            // the one call site the v0.55.2 fix did not reach.
+            // ⚠ The full proposal travels — reset AND costClasses. This call omitted `costClasses` from
+            // the day the flag was introduced (`7412435`, v0.52.0), so the status listing printed an
+            // accept command WIDER than the proposal it echoed — the silent-widening hazard
+            // `eligibilityAcceptCommand`'s own comment warns about. (v0.55.2 fixed the separate
+            // store-persistence half in `acceptInterpretation`; it never touched this file.)
             process.stdout.write(`      accept with: ${eligibilityAcceptCommand(i + 1, p.signature, p.proposed.class, sc, p.proposed.reset, p.proposed.costClasses)}\n`);
         }
     });