lazycodex-ai 5.1.35 → 5.1.40

package/packages/shared-skills/skills/frontend/scripts/perfection/fixtures/accent-stripes/positive/border-top-card.css

@@ -0,0 +1,5 @@
+.feature-card {
+  padding: 24px;
+  border-radius: 12px;
+  border-top: 4px solid #6366f1;
+}

package/packages/shared-skills/skills/frontend/scripts/perfection/fixtures/accent-stripes/positive/cva-variant.ts

@@ -0,0 +1 @@
+export const card = cva("rounded-xl bg-white p-6 border-l-4 border-rose-500")

package/packages/shared-skills/skills/frontend/scripts/perfection/fixtures/accent-stripes/positive/gradient-edges.css

@@ -0,0 +1,26 @@
+.hard-stop {
+  border-radius: 12px;
+  background: linear-gradient(to right, #6366f1 4px, #fff 4px);
+}
+
+.image-border {
+  border-radius: 12px;
+  border-left: 4px solid;
+  border-image: linear-gradient(#6366f1, #a855f7) 1;
+}
+
+.glow { position: relative; border-radius: 12px; }
+.glow::before {
+  content: "";
+  position: absolute;
+  top: 0;
+  bottom: 0;
+  left: 0;
+  width: 3px;
+  background: linear-gradient(to bottom, #6366f1, #a855f7);
+}
+
+.end-band {
+  border-radius: 12px;
+  background-image: linear-gradient(to right, #fff calc(100% - 4px), #f43f5e calc(100% - 4px));
+}

package/packages/shared-skills/skills/frontend/scripts/perfection/fixtures/accent-stripes/positive/inline-styles.tsx

@@ -0,0 +1,6 @@
+export const Tip = () => (
+  <>
+    <div style={{ borderRadius: 12, borderLeft: "4px solid #ef4444" }}>Careful</div>
+    <div className="rounded-lg" style={{ borderTop: '3px solid var(--brand)' }}>New</div>
+  </>
+)

package/packages/shared-skills/skills/frontend/scripts/perfection/fixtures/accent-stripes/positive/inset-shadow.css

@@ -0,0 +1,4 @@
+.note {
+  border-radius: 8px;
+  box-shadow: inset 4px 0 0 0 oklch(0.65 0.2 250), 0 1px 2px rgb(0 0 0 / 0.06);
+}

package/packages/shared-skills/skills/frontend/scripts/perfection/fixtures/accent-stripes/positive/non-visible-focus-and-nested.tsx

@@ -0,0 +1,6 @@
+const css = css`
+  .card:focus-within { border-radius: 12px; border-left: 3px solid #6366f1; }
+  td .promo-card { border-radius: 8px; border-left: 4px solid #f43f5e; }
+`
+
+export const Focused = () => <div className="rounded-xl focus:border-l-4 focus:border-indigo-500">Card</div>

package/packages/shared-skills/skills/frontend/scripts/perfection/fixtures/accent-stripes/positive/pseudo-bar.css

@@ -0,0 +1,13 @@
+.stat {
+  position: relative;
+  border-radius: 12px;
+  overflow: hidden;
+}
+
+.stat::before {
+  content: "";
+  position: absolute;
+  inset: 0 auto 0 0;
+  width: 4px;
+  background: #10b981;
+}

package/packages/shared-skills/skills/frontend/scripts/perfection/fixtures/accent-stripes/positive/split-rule-and-token.scss

@@ -0,0 +1,14 @@
+.callout {
+  border-radius: 0.75rem;
+  border-left: 3px solid var(--color-accent);
+}
+
+.tile {
+  border-radius: 16px;
+  background: var(--surface);
+  &.is-featured {
+    border-left-width: 4px;
+    border-left-style: solid;
+    border-left-color: hsl(262 83% 58%);
+  }
+}

package/packages/shared-skills/skills/frontend/scripts/perfection/fixtures/accent-stripes/positive/styled-components.tsx

@@ -0,0 +1,14 @@
+import styled, { createGlobalStyle } from "styled-components"
+
+export const Banner = styled.div`
+  padding: ${({ theme }) => theme.space[4]}px;
+  border-radius: 12px;
+  border-left: 4px solid #2563eb;
+`
+
+export const Global = createGlobalStyle`
+  .promo-card {
+    border-radius: 8px;
+    border-top: 3px solid var(--color-brand);
+  }
+`

package/packages/shared-skills/skills/frontend/scripts/perfection/fixtures/accent-stripes/positive/tailwind-cards.tsx

@@ -0,0 +1,8 @@
+export function Cards({ featured }: { featured: boolean }) {
+  return (
+    <section>
+      <div className="rounded-xl border-l-4 border-indigo-500 bg-white p-6">Fast</div>
+      <article className={cn("rounded-2xl p-4", featured && "border-t-4 border-t-primary")}>Plans</article>
+    </section>
+  )
+}

package/packages/shared-skills/skills/frontend/scripts/perfection/fixtures/accent-stripes/positive/tailwind-inset-and-style.vue

@@ -0,0 +1,11 @@
+<template>
+  <div class="rounded-md p-4 shadow-[inset_3px_0_0_0_#f59e0b]">Heads up</div>
+  <div class="quote">Quote</div>
+</template>
+
+<style scoped>
+.quote {
+  border-radius: 10px;
+  border-left: 5px solid rebeccapurple;
+}
+</style>

package/packages/shared-skills/skills/frontend/scripts/perfection/fixtures/accent-stripes/positive/tailwind-pseudo.html

@@ -0,0 +1,3 @@
+<div class="relative overflow-hidden rounded-lg p-6 before:absolute before:inset-y-0 before:left-0 before:w-1 before:bg-emerald-500">
+  Uptime 99.99%
+</div>

package/packages/shared-skills/skills/git-master/SKILL.md

@@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
 ---
 name: git-master
-description: "Handles git work: atomic commits, rebase, squash, blame, bisect, reflog, and history questions. Use whenever a task needs a commit or a git-history investigation; skip for ordinary code edits."
+description: "MUST USE for ANY git operations: atomic commits, rebase/squash/fixup, and history search (blame, bisect, log -S, reflog). Load it before running git yourself, or pass load_skills=['git-master'] to the task that commits. Triggers: 'commit', 'rebase', 'squash', 'who wrote', 'when was X added', 'find the commit that'."
 ---
 
 # Git Master

package/packages/shared-skills/skills/ulw-plan/SKILL.md

@@ -34,7 +34,7 @@ Example opening (adapt the wording, keep every commitment):
 
 ## INTENT ROUTING - pick ONE intent reference
 
-**Review modifiers are a gate trigger, not a style cue.** If the user says "high accuracy", "ultra high accuracy", "고정밀", "deep review", or equivalent - in ANY turn, even appended to a follow-up question and even after the plan already exists - set `review_required: true` in the draft: the dual high-accuracy review (native `momus` + the independent Oracle review) is now REQUIRED before handoff, and if the plan already exists you run it this same turn. The review runs under the bounded convergence contract in `full-workflow.md`: a 5-round cap (unlimited only on explicit user request), evidence-backed blocker eligibility, and approval-with-notes counting as approval. Answering the current question more carefully does NOT satisfy it. This does NOT choose CLEAR/UNCLEAR and does NOT suppress interview.
+**Review modifiers are a gate trigger, not a style cue.** If the user says "high accuracy", "ultra high accuracy", "고정밀", "deep review", or equivalent - in ANY turn, even appended to a follow-up question and even after the plan already exists - set `review_required: true` in the draft: the dual high-accuracy review (native `momus` + the independent Oracle review) is now REQUIRED before handoff, and if the plan already exists you run it this same turn. The review runs under the bounded convergence contract in `full-workflow.md`: convergence-bounded rounds (another round only while the previous one raised a new blocker-eligible finding or closed a ledger blocker; a round with neither that still does not approve stops the review), evidence-backed blocker eligibility, and approval-with-notes counting as approval. Answering the current question more carefully does NOT satisfy it. This does NOT choose CLEAR/UNCLEAR and does NOT suppress interview.
 
 After grounding, make ONE judgment, record `intent: clear|unclear` plus `review_required`, **ANNOUNCE both to the user in one line**, then load ONE intent reference (you ALSO read `references/full-workflow.md` for the shared mechanics - see below). The test keys on whether the desired **OUTCOME** is clear, NOT on request length. This verdict line and the opening announcement above are the two mandatory user-visible signals of a planning session - it tells the user whether they will be interviewed and whether high-accuracy review is already requested; never skip either.
 

package/packages/shared-skills/skills/ulw-plan/references/full-workflow.md

@@ -214,14 +214,15 @@ Every reviewer prompt must carry this intake contract with all angle-bracket val
 The first action must open the literal workspace root as a directory descriptor, then traverse `.omo`, `plans`, and the final target with descriptor-relative no-follow opens, `fstat` each ancestor as a directory and the final descriptor as a regular file, and hash all bytes read from that same final descriptor. If the platform cannot guarantee this chain, or any path/runtime/launch/receipt/digest check drifts, return `INCONCLUSIVE` before reviewing. Echo the literal workspace, runtime home, target, digest, round, and launch ID; the parent separately matches the completion envelope to the persisted session/process receipt. Never search or use another artifact.
 
 ### Bounded convergence (the review must terminate)
-Review rounds are capped at 5 (unlimited only on explicit user request), and an approval whose only remaining items are notes counts as approval. A finding may BLOCK only when it names at least one `blocker_eligibility` category below with its concrete evidence - an IS row no todo closes, no QA scenario proves, or the approach cannot reach for the named user is such a category; every other finding - speculative durability, replay/crash-recovery, schema, CLI-parsing, state-machine, or hardening concerns the accepted scope never required - is recorded as a non-blocking note and becomes implementation/test work, never plan expansion. After round 1 the blocker ledger FREEZES: later rounds verify accepted ledger blockers, regressions introduced by fixes, and new findings that pass eligibility - they never rediscover the plan from scratch. Fixes apply the smallest edit that resolves the cited blocker; neither reviews nor fixes grow the plan's scope. Every reviewer prompt carries this convergence contract alongside the intake contract. On cap exhaustion without approval: STOP, report outstanding blockers, ask the user - continue / accept / adjust.
+Review continues until unconditional approval, but a further round runs only while the previous round made progress: it raised at least one NEW blocker-eligible finding (one not already in the ledger and not a restatement of a closed blocker), or it confirmed at least one ledger blocker closed. A round that does neither and still does not approve ends the review: stop, report the outstanding blockers, and ask the user. This is the non-convergence guard, so there is no fixed round count; it terminates because the ledger is frozen after round 1, so every closure shrinks it. An approval whose only remaining items are notes counts as approval. A finding may BLOCK only when it names at least one `blocker_eligibility` category below with its concrete evidence - an IS row no todo closes, no QA scenario proves, or the approach cannot reach for the named user is such a category; every other finding - speculative durability, replay/crash-recovery, schema, CLI-parsing, state-machine, or hardening concerns the accepted scope never required - is recorded as a non-blocking note and becomes implementation/test work, never plan expansion. After round 1 the blocker ledger FREEZES: later rounds verify accepted ledger blockers, regressions introduced by fixes, and new findings that pass eligibility - they never rediscover the plan from scratch. Fixes apply the smallest edit that resolves the cited blocker; neither reviews nor fixes grow the plan's scope. Every reviewer prompt carries this convergence contract alongside the intake contract. On cap exhaustion without approval: STOP, report outstanding blockers, ask the user - continue / accept / adjust.
 
 <!-- ulw-plan-review-convergence-contract -->
 ```json
 {
-  "max_rounds": 5,
-  "max_rounds_override": "explicit_user_request_only",
-  "on_cap_reached": "stop_report_outstanding_blockers_ask_user",
+  "max_rounds": null,
+  "continue_while": "previous_round_raised_new_blocker_eligible_finding_or_closed_ledger_blocker",
+  "stop_on": "round_without_new_blocker_eligible_finding_or_ledger_blocker_closure",
+  "on_stop_without_approval": "stop_report_outstanding_blockers_ask_user",
   "blocker_eligibility": [
     "explicit_requirement_or_accepted_decision",
     "existing_failing_regression",