kyro-ai 3.2.1 → 3.2.3
This diff represents the content of publicly available package versions that have been released to one of the supported registries. The information contained in this diff is provided for informational purposes only and reflects changes between package versions as they appear in their respective public registries.
- package/.claude-plugin/plugin.json +4 -2
- package/README.md +8 -11
- package/WORKFLOW.yaml +1 -1
- package/agents/orchestrator.md +3 -3
- package/commands/forge.md +22 -44
- package/commands/status.md +21 -79
- package/commands/wrap-up.md +18 -74
- package/dist/cli/adapters/codex.js +1 -1
- package/dist/cli/adapters/codex.js.map +1 -1
- package/dist/cli/adapters/command-skills.js +1 -1
- package/dist/cli/adapters/command-skills.js.map +1 -1
- package/dist/cli/app.js +1 -1
- package/dist/cli/app.js.map +1 -1
- package/dist/cli/commands/doctor.d.ts +2 -1
- package/dist/cli/commands/doctor.d.ts.map +1 -1
- package/dist/cli/commands/doctor.js +8 -4
- package/dist/cli/commands/doctor.js.map +1 -1
- package/dist/cli/commands/token-audit.d.ts +3 -0
- package/dist/cli/commands/token-audit.d.ts.map +1 -0
- package/dist/cli/commands/token-audit.js +263 -0
- package/dist/cli/commands/token-audit.js.map +1 -0
- package/dist/cli/commands/tui.js +3 -3
- package/dist/cli/commands/tui.js.map +1 -1
- package/dist/cli/help.d.ts.map +1 -1
- package/dist/cli/help.js +3 -0
- package/dist/cli/help.js.map +1 -1
- package/dist/cli/options.d.ts.map +1 -1
- package/dist/cli/options.js +5 -0
- package/dist/cli/options.js.map +1 -1
- package/dist/cli/types.d.ts +1 -0
- package/dist/cli/types.d.ts.map +1 -1
- package/docs/HOW-TO-USE-CODEX.md +28 -60
- package/docs/HOW-TO-USE-OPENCODE.md +26 -72
- package/docs/agent-adapters.md +40 -118
- package/docs/architecture.md +7 -2
- package/docs/cli.md +25 -2
- package/docs/commands-reference.md +22 -32
- package/docs/getting-started.md +65 -115
- package/package.json +1 -1
- package/skills/sprint-forge/SKILL.md +11 -10
- package/skills/sprint-forge/assets/README.md +38 -17
- package/skills/sprint-forge/assets/fixtures/subcommands-and-reports.sizingDecision.json +17 -0
- package/skills/sprint-forge/assets/helpers/analysis/audit.md +18 -0
- package/skills/sprint-forge/assets/helpers/analysis/bugfix.md +19 -0
- package/skills/sprint-forge/assets/helpers/analysis/feature.md +28 -0
- package/skills/sprint-forge/assets/helpers/analysis/new-project.md +18 -0
- package/skills/sprint-forge/assets/helpers/analysis/refactor.md +18 -0
- package/skills/sprint-forge/assets/helpers/analysis/tech-debt.md +18 -0
- package/skills/sprint-forge/assets/helpers/metrics.md +4 -4
- package/skills/sprint-forge/assets/helpers/reentry-generator.md +4 -4
- package/skills/sprint-forge/assets/modes/INIT.md +45 -177
- package/skills/sprint-forge/assets/modes/SPRINT.md +20 -246
- package/skills/sprint-forge/assets/modes/STATUS.md +46 -128
- package/skills/sprint-forge/assets/modes/close-sprint.md +29 -0
- package/skills/sprint-forge/assets/modes/execute-task.md +26 -0
- package/skills/sprint-forge/assets/modes/plan-sprint.md +29 -0
- package/skills/sprint-forge/assets/modes/recover.md +23 -0
- package/skills/sprint-forge/assets/modes/review-task.md +25 -0
- package/skills/sprint-forge/assets/templates/DEBT.summary.json +12 -0
- package/skills/sprint-forge/assets/templates/PROJECT-README.md +16 -60
- package/skills/sprint-forge/assets/templates/REENTRY-PROMPTS.md +18 -87
- package/skills/sprint-forge/assets/templates/ROADMAP.md +16 -65
- package/skills/sprint-forge/assets/templates/ROADMAP.summary.json +24 -0
- package/skills/sprint-forge/assets/templates/SPRINT.summary.json +16 -0
- package/skills/sprint-forge/assets/templates/index.json +24 -0
- package/skills/sprint-forge/assets/templates/state.json +11 -0
- package/skills/sprint-forge/assets/helpers/analysis-guide.md +0 -207
|
@@ -27,45 +27,16 @@ related:
|
|
|
27
27
|
> Created: {date}
|
|
28
28
|
> Codebase: `{codebase_path}`
|
|
29
29
|
|
|
30
|
-
|
|
31
|
-
|
|
32
|
-
## What Is This
|
|
33
|
-
|
|
34
|
-
This directory contains the working artifacts for {description_of_work}. It is managed by the `kyro-ai` skill and follows an adaptive sprint workflow.
|
|
35
|
-
|
|
36
|
-
---
|
|
37
|
-
|
|
38
|
-
## For AI Agents — Mandatory Reading Order
|
|
39
|
-
|
|
40
|
-
If you are an AI agent resuming work on this project, read these files in order:
|
|
41
|
-
|
|
42
|
-
1. **This README** — You are here. Understand the project structure.
|
|
43
|
-
2. **ROADMAP.md** — The adaptive roadmap with all planned sprints and execution rules.
|
|
44
|
-
3. **Last completed sprint** — The most recent sprint file in `phases/`. Read its retro, recommendations, and debt table.
|
|
45
|
-
4. **RE-ENTRY-PROMPTS.md** — Pre-written prompts for common actions. Copy the appropriate one.
|
|
46
|
-
|
|
47
|
-
---
|
|
48
|
-
|
|
49
|
-
## Directory Structure
|
|
30
|
+
This directory stores Kyro artifacts for `{scope}`. Use structured summaries first; open Markdown only when a router needs durable evidence.
|
|
50
31
|
|
|
51
|
-
|
|
52
|
-
{output_kyro_dir}/
|
|
53
|
-
├── README.md ← This file
|
|
54
|
-
├── ROADMAP.md ← Adaptive roadmap (living document)
|
|
55
|
-
├── RE-ENTRY-PROMPTS.md ← Context recovery prompts
|
|
56
|
-
├── findings/ ← Analysis findings (one file per area)
|
|
57
|
-
│ ├── 01-{slug}.md
|
|
58
|
-
│ ├── 02-{slug}.md
|
|
59
|
-
│ └── ...
|
|
60
|
-
└── phases/ ← Sprint documents (generated one at a time)
|
|
61
|
-
├── SPRINT-1-{slug}.md
|
|
62
|
-
├── SPRINT-2-{slug}.md
|
|
63
|
-
└── ...
|
|
64
|
-
```
|
|
32
|
+
## Quick Resume
|
|
65
33
|
|
|
66
|
-
|
|
34
|
+
1. Read `state.json`.
|
|
35
|
+
2. Read `index.json`.
|
|
36
|
+
3. Read `ROADMAP.summary.json`.
|
|
37
|
+
4. Run `kyro-forge`, `kyro-status`, or `kyro-wrap-up`.
|
|
67
38
|
|
|
68
|
-
##
|
|
39
|
+
## Paths
|
|
69
40
|
|
|
70
41
|
| Resource | Path |
|
|
71
42
|
|----------|------|
|
|
@@ -74,34 +45,19 @@ If you are an AI agent resuming work on this project, read these files in order:
|
|
|
74
45
|
| Findings | `{output_kyro_dir}/findings/` |
|
|
75
46
|
| Sprints | `{output_kyro_dir}/phases/` |
|
|
76
47
|
| Roadmap | `{output_kyro_dir}/ROADMAP.md` |
|
|
77
|
-
| Re-entry
|
|
78
|
-
|
|
79
|
-
---
|
|
48
|
+
| Re-entry | `{output_kyro_dir}/RE-ENTRY-PROMPTS.md` |
|
|
80
49
|
|
|
81
|
-
##
|
|
82
|
-
|
|
83
|
-
1. Sprints are generated **one at a time** — never pre-generated
|
|
84
|
-
2. Each sprint feeds from the previous sprint's retro and recommendations
|
|
85
|
-
3. The accumulated debt table passes from sprint to sprint, never losing items
|
|
86
|
-
4. The roadmap adapts based on what execution reveals
|
|
87
|
-
5. Re-entry prompts are updated after each sprint for context persistence
|
|
88
|
-
|
|
89
|
-
---
|
|
90
|
-
|
|
91
|
-
## Current State — Baseline
|
|
92
|
-
|
|
93
|
-
<!-- Filled during INIT with baseline metrics -->
|
|
50
|
+
## Current State
|
|
94
51
|
|
|
95
52
|
| Metric | Value |
|
|
96
53
|
|--------|-------|
|
|
97
|
-
|
|
|
98
|
-
|
|
99
|
-
|
|
54
|
+
| Work type | {work_type} |
|
|
55
|
+
| Planned sprints | {planned_sprint_count} |
|
|
56
|
+
| Active sprint | {active_sprint} |
|
|
57
|
+
| Next action | {next_action} |
|
|
100
58
|
|
|
101
59
|
## Sprint Map
|
|
102
60
|
|
|
103
|
-
|
|
104
|
-
|
|
105
|
-
|
|
|
106
|
-
|--------|--------|-------|-----------------|
|
|
107
|
-
| 1 | {status} | {focus} | {deliverables} |
|
|
61
|
+
| Sprint | Status | Focus | Proof |
|
|
62
|
+
|--------|--------|-------|-------|
|
|
63
|
+
| 1 | {status} | {focus} | {sprint_proof} |
|
|
@@ -27,106 +27,37 @@ related:
|
|
|
27
27
|
> Last updated: {date}
|
|
28
28
|
> Current sprint: {current_sprint_number}
|
|
29
29
|
|
|
30
|
-
|
|
30
|
+
Use these prompts to resume through summary-first routing. Open long Markdown only when a router asks for it.
|
|
31
31
|
|
|
32
|
-
|
|
33
|
-
|
|
34
|
-
## Output Directory
|
|
35
|
-
|
|
36
|
-
```
|
|
37
|
-
{output_kyro_dir}
|
|
38
|
-
```
|
|
39
|
-
|
|
40
|
-
This is where all kyro-ai documents for this project live. All file paths below are relative to this directory.
|
|
41
|
-
|
|
42
|
-
---
|
|
43
|
-
|
|
44
|
-
## Quick Reference
|
|
45
|
-
|
|
46
|
-
| Sprint | File | Status |
|
|
47
|
-
|--------|------|--------|
|
|
48
|
-
| 1 | `phases/SPRINT-1-{slug}.md` | {status} |
|
|
49
|
-
|
|
50
|
-
---
|
|
51
|
-
|
|
52
|
-
## Dynamic Paths
|
|
32
|
+
## Fast Context
|
|
53
33
|
|
|
54
34
|
| Resource | Path |
|
|
55
35
|
|----------|------|
|
|
56
|
-
|
|
|
57
|
-
|
|
|
58
|
-
| Roadmap | `{output_kyro_dir}/ROADMAP.
|
|
59
|
-
|
|
|
60
|
-
|
|
61
|
-
---
|
|
36
|
+
| State | `{output_kyro_dir}/state.json` |
|
|
37
|
+
| Index | `{output_kyro_dir}/index.json` |
|
|
38
|
+
| Roadmap Summary | `{output_kyro_dir}/ROADMAP.summary.json` |
|
|
39
|
+
| Sprints | `{output_kyro_dir}/phases/` |
|
|
62
40
|
|
|
63
|
-
##
|
|
64
|
-
|
|
65
|
-
Use this prompt when INIT has been completed and you need to generate Sprint 1.
|
|
41
|
+
## Resume Planning
|
|
66
42
|
|
|
43
|
+
```text
|
|
44
|
+
Continue Kyro scope `{scope}`. Read `{output_kyro_dir}/state.json`, `{output_kyro_dir}/index.json`, and `{output_kyro_dir}/ROADMAP.summary.json` first. Then use kyro-forge to plan the next sprint. Open ROADMAP.md or finding Markdown only if the router requests missing details.
|
|
67
45
|
```
|
|
68
|
-
I'm working on the {scope} project. The analysis and roadmap have been created.
|
|
69
46
|
|
|
70
|
-
|
|
71
|
-
1. {output_kyro_dir}/README.md
|
|
72
|
-
2. {output_kyro_dir}/ROADMAP.md
|
|
73
|
-
3. The finding files in {output_kyro_dir}/findings/
|
|
47
|
+
## Resume Execution
|
|
74
48
|
|
|
75
|
-
|
|
76
|
-
and the
|
|
49
|
+
```text
|
|
50
|
+
Continue active Kyro sprint for `{scope}`. Read state.json and index.json first, then the active SPRINT summary JSON if present. Use kyro-forge to route to execution, review, close, or recover. Open sprint Markdown only when required for the active task.
|
|
77
51
|
```
|
|
78
52
|
|
|
79
|
-
|
|
80
|
-
|
|
81
|
-
## Scenario 2 — Next Sprint (Sprint N)
|
|
82
|
-
|
|
83
|
-
Use this prompt when Sprint N-1 is complete and you need to generate Sprint N.
|
|
84
|
-
|
|
85
|
-
```
|
|
86
|
-
I'm continuing work on the {scope} project. Sprint {N-1} has been completed.
|
|
87
|
-
|
|
88
|
-
Read these files in order:
|
|
89
|
-
1. {output_kyro_dir}/README.md
|
|
90
|
-
2. {output_kyro_dir}/ROADMAP.md
|
|
91
|
-
3. {output_kyro_dir}/phases/{last_sprint_file} (pay attention to Retro, Recommendations, and Debt table)
|
|
92
|
-
4. The finding file(s) for Sprint {N}: {output_kyro_dir}/findings/{next_finding_file}
|
|
93
|
-
|
|
94
|
-
Then use /kyro:forge to generate Sprint {N}. Ensure all recommendations from Sprint {N-1}
|
|
95
|
-
are addressed in the Disposition table.
|
|
96
|
-
```
|
|
97
|
-
|
|
98
|
-
---
|
|
99
|
-
|
|
100
|
-
## Scenario 3 — Execute Current Sprint
|
|
101
|
-
|
|
102
|
-
Use this prompt when a sprint has been generated but not yet executed.
|
|
103
|
-
|
|
104
|
-
```
|
|
105
|
-
I'm working on the {scope} project. Sprint {N} has been generated and needs execution.
|
|
106
|
-
|
|
107
|
-
Read these files in order:
|
|
108
|
-
1. {output_kyro_dir}/README.md
|
|
109
|
-
2. {output_kyro_dir}/ROADMAP.md
|
|
110
|
-
3. {output_kyro_dir}/phases/{current_sprint_file}
|
|
111
|
-
|
|
112
|
-
Then use /kyro:forge to execute Sprint {N}. Work through each phase and task,
|
|
113
|
-
marking progress as you go. Add emergent phases if new work is discovered.
|
|
114
|
-
```
|
|
115
|
-
|
|
116
|
-
---
|
|
117
|
-
|
|
118
|
-
## Scenario 4 — Check Project Status
|
|
119
|
-
|
|
120
|
-
Use this prompt to get a progress report.
|
|
53
|
+
## Status
|
|
121
54
|
|
|
55
|
+
```text
|
|
56
|
+
Report Kyro status for `{scope}`. Read state.json, index.json, ROADMAP.summary.json, SPRINT summaries, and DEBT.summary.json first. Use kyro-status brief unless full evidence is requested.
|
|
122
57
|
```
|
|
123
|
-
I need a status report on the {scope} project.
|
|
124
58
|
|
|
125
|
-
|
|
126
|
-
1. {output_kyro_dir}/README.md
|
|
127
|
-
2. {output_kyro_dir}/ROADMAP.md
|
|
128
|
-
3. All sprint files in {output_kyro_dir}/phases/
|
|
59
|
+
## Closeout
|
|
129
60
|
|
|
130
|
-
|
|
131
|
-
|
|
61
|
+
```text
|
|
62
|
+
Close the Kyro session for `{scope}`. Read state.json and index.json first, then use kyro-wrap-up. Update summaries and re-entry prompts after any Markdown changes.
|
|
132
63
|
```
|
|
@@ -26,8 +26,6 @@ related:
|
|
|
26
26
|
|
|
27
27
|
> Generated by `kyro-ai` on {date}
|
|
28
28
|
|
|
29
|
-
---
|
|
30
|
-
|
|
31
29
|
## Project Paths
|
|
32
30
|
|
|
33
31
|
| Path | Value |
|
|
@@ -37,80 +35,32 @@ related:
|
|
|
37
35
|
| Findings | `{output_kyro_dir}/findings/` |
|
|
38
36
|
| Sprints | `{output_kyro_dir}/phases/` |
|
|
39
37
|
|
|
40
|
-
|
|
41
|
-
|
|
42
|
-
## Execution Rules
|
|
43
|
-
|
|
44
|
-
These rules govern the entire sprint lifecycle. They are non-negotiable.
|
|
45
|
-
|
|
46
|
-
1. **Sprint-by-Sprint** — Sprints are generated ONE AT A TIME. Never pre-generate all sprints. Each sprint is informed by the results of the previous one.
|
|
47
|
-
2. **Retro Feeds Forward** — The retrospective and recommendations of Sprint N-1 are formal inputs for Sprint N. They cannot be ignored.
|
|
48
|
-
3. **Recommendations are Dispositioned** — Every recommendation from the previous sprint must either become a task or have its deferral justified in the Disposition table.
|
|
49
|
-
4. **Debt is Inherited** — The Accumulated Technical Debt table passes from sprint to sprint in full. Items are never deleted, only resolved.
|
|
50
|
-
5. **Phases are Suggested** — The roadmap defines suggested phases per sprint. During execution, emergent phases MUST be added when new work is discovered.
|
|
51
|
-
6. **Emergent Findings Generate Phases** — If execution reveals issues not covered by the plan, new phases are added to the current sprint.
|
|
52
|
-
7. **Re-entry Prompts are Updated** — After INIT and after each executed sprint, re-entry prompts are refreshed to reflect current state.
|
|
53
|
-
8. **Roadmap Adapts** — If execution reveals that planned sprints need modification, this roadmap is updated. The plan serves execution, not the reverse.
|
|
54
|
-
9. **Definition of Done** — Each sprint has explicit completion criteria. A sprint is not done until all DoD items are checked.
|
|
55
|
-
|
|
56
|
-
---
|
|
57
|
-
|
|
58
|
-
## Task States
|
|
59
|
-
|
|
60
|
-
| Symbol | State | Meaning |
|
|
61
|
-
|--------|-------|---------|
|
|
62
|
-
| `[ ]` | Pending | Not started |
|
|
63
|
-
| `[~]` | In Progress | Currently being worked on |
|
|
64
|
-
| `[x]` | Done | Completed and verified |
|
|
65
|
-
| `[!]` | Blocked | Cannot proceed — blocker documented |
|
|
66
|
-
| `[-]` | Skipped | Intentionally skipped with justification |
|
|
67
|
-
| `[>]` | Carry-over | Not completed — carried over to next sprint |
|
|
68
|
-
|
|
69
|
-
---
|
|
38
|
+
## Sprint Sizing Decision
|
|
70
39
|
|
|
71
|
-
|
|
72
|
-
|
|
73
|
-
|
|
40
|
+
```json
|
|
41
|
+
{sizing_decision_json}
|
|
42
|
+
```
|
|
74
43
|
|
|
75
|
-
|
|
76
|
-
|-------|-------------|
|
|
77
|
-
| Sprint # | Sequential number |
|
|
78
|
-
| Finding Source | Which finding file(s) this sprint addresses |
|
|
79
|
-
| Version Target | Target version after this sprint (if applicable) |
|
|
80
|
-
| Type | audit / refactor / feature / bugfix / debt |
|
|
81
|
-
| Focus | One-line description of the sprint's primary goal |
|
|
82
|
-
| Suggested Phases | Initial phases suggested by this roadmap (may expand during execution) |
|
|
83
|
-
| Dependencies | Which sprints must complete before this one |
|
|
44
|
+
Acceptance:
|
|
84
45
|
|
|
85
|
-
|
|
46
|
+
- `recommendedSprintCount` equals the sprint rows below.
|
|
47
|
+
- Each sprint has exactly one `sprintProofs` entry.
|
|
48
|
+
- Multi-sprint plans include at least one `splitTriggers` entry.
|
|
49
|
+
- `whyNotFewer` and `whyNotMore` are non-empty.
|
|
86
50
|
|
|
87
51
|
## Dependency Map
|
|
88
52
|
|
|
89
|
-
|
|
90
|
-
<!-- Example:
|
|
91
|
-
Sprint 1 → Sprint 2 → Sprint 3
|
|
92
|
-
↘ Sprint 4 → Sprint 5
|
|
93
|
-
-->
|
|
94
|
-
|
|
95
|
-
```
|
|
53
|
+
```text
|
|
96
54
|
{dependency_diagram}
|
|
97
55
|
```
|
|
98
56
|
|
|
99
|
-
---
|
|
100
|
-
|
|
101
57
|
## Sprint Summary
|
|
102
58
|
|
|
103
|
-
|
|
104
|
-
|
|
105
|
-
|
|
|
106
|
-
|--------|--------------|---------|------|-------|-------------|--------|
|
|
107
|
-
| 1 | `{finding_file}` | {version} | {type} | {focus} | — | pending |
|
|
108
|
-
|
|
109
|
-
---
|
|
110
|
-
|
|
111
|
-
## Detailed Sprint Definitions
|
|
59
|
+
| Sprint | Finding Source | Version | Type | Focus | Dependencies | Proof | Status |
|
|
60
|
+
|--------|----------------|---------|------|-------|--------------|-------|--------|
|
|
61
|
+
| 1 | `{finding_file}` | {version} | {type} | {focus} | — | {sprint_proof} | pending |
|
|
112
62
|
|
|
113
|
-
|
|
63
|
+
## Sprint Definitions
|
|
114
64
|
|
|
115
65
|
### Sprint 1 — {title}
|
|
116
66
|
|
|
@@ -119,8 +69,9 @@ Sprint 1 → Sprint 2 → Sprint 3
|
|
|
119
69
|
- **Type**: {type}
|
|
120
70
|
- **Focus**: {focus}
|
|
121
71
|
- **Dependencies**: None
|
|
72
|
+
- **Proof**: {sprint_proof}
|
|
122
73
|
- **Suggested Phases**:
|
|
123
74
|
1. {phase_1_name} — {phase_1_description}
|
|
124
75
|
2. {phase_2_name} — {phase_2_description}
|
|
125
76
|
|
|
126
|
-
<!-- Add
|
|
77
|
+
<!-- Add only justified sprints. Optimize for justified boundaries, not fewer sprints. -->
|
|
@@ -0,0 +1,24 @@
|
|
|
1
|
+
{
|
|
2
|
+
"schemaVersion": 1,
|
|
3
|
+
"scope": "{scope}",
|
|
4
|
+
"status": "planned",
|
|
5
|
+
"summary": "{roadmap_summary}",
|
|
6
|
+
"plannedSprintCount": 0,
|
|
7
|
+
"completedSprintCount": 0,
|
|
8
|
+
"adaptationCount": 0,
|
|
9
|
+
"sizingDecision": {
|
|
10
|
+
"recommendedSprintCount": 0,
|
|
11
|
+
"riskLevel": "low",
|
|
12
|
+
"rationale": "{sizing_rationale}",
|
|
13
|
+
"splitTriggers": [],
|
|
14
|
+
"whyNotFewer": "{why_not_fewer}",
|
|
15
|
+
"whyNotMore": "{why_not_more}",
|
|
16
|
+
"sprintProofs": []
|
|
17
|
+
},
|
|
18
|
+
"nextRecommendedAction": "plan_sprint",
|
|
19
|
+
"openDecisions": [],
|
|
20
|
+
"relevantArtifactPaths": [
|
|
21
|
+
".agents/kyro/scopes/{scope}/ROADMAP.md"
|
|
22
|
+
],
|
|
23
|
+
"lastUpdated": "{date}"
|
|
24
|
+
}
|
|
@@ -0,0 +1,16 @@
|
|
|
1
|
+
{
|
|
2
|
+
"schemaVersion": 1,
|
|
3
|
+
"scope": "{scope}",
|
|
4
|
+
"sprint": "SPRINT-{N}",
|
|
5
|
+
"status": "planned",
|
|
6
|
+
"completedTasks": 0,
|
|
7
|
+
"blockedTasks": 0,
|
|
8
|
+
"carryOverTasks": 0,
|
|
9
|
+
"nextRecommendedAction": "execute_task",
|
|
10
|
+
"nextTask": "{task_id}",
|
|
11
|
+
"openDecisions": [],
|
|
12
|
+
"filesTouched": [],
|
|
13
|
+
"debtDeltas": [],
|
|
14
|
+
"sourceMarkdown": ".agents/kyro/scopes/{scope}/phases/SPRINT-{N}-{slug}.md",
|
|
15
|
+
"lastUpdated": "{date}"
|
|
16
|
+
}
|
|
@@ -0,0 +1,24 @@
|
|
|
1
|
+
{
|
|
2
|
+
"schemaVersion": 1,
|
|
3
|
+
"scope": "{scope}",
|
|
4
|
+
"roadmapSummary": "{roadmap_summary}",
|
|
5
|
+
"activeSprintSummary": null,
|
|
6
|
+
"openDebtCount": 0,
|
|
7
|
+
"nextTask": null,
|
|
8
|
+
"sizingDecision": {
|
|
9
|
+
"recommendedSprintCount": 0,
|
|
10
|
+
"riskLevel": "low",
|
|
11
|
+
"rationale": "{sizing_rationale}",
|
|
12
|
+
"splitTriggers": [],
|
|
13
|
+
"whyNotFewer": "{why_not_fewer}",
|
|
14
|
+
"whyNotMore": "{why_not_more}",
|
|
15
|
+
"sprintProofs": []
|
|
16
|
+
},
|
|
17
|
+
"relevantArtifactPaths": {
|
|
18
|
+
"roadmap": ".agents/kyro/scopes/{scope}/ROADMAP.md",
|
|
19
|
+
"roadmapSummary": ".agents/kyro/scopes/{scope}/ROADMAP.summary.json",
|
|
20
|
+
"sprints": ".agents/kyro/scopes/{scope}/phases",
|
|
21
|
+
"reentry": ".agents/kyro/scopes/{scope}/RE-ENTRY-PROMPTS.md"
|
|
22
|
+
},
|
|
23
|
+
"lastUpdated": "{date}"
|
|
24
|
+
}
|
|
@@ -0,0 +1,11 @@
|
|
|
1
|
+
{
|
|
2
|
+
"schemaVersion": 1,
|
|
3
|
+
"scope": "{scope}",
|
|
4
|
+
"status": "planning",
|
|
5
|
+
"activeSprint": null,
|
|
6
|
+
"currentPhase": "init",
|
|
7
|
+
"nextAction": "plan_sprint",
|
|
8
|
+
"roadmapPath": ".agents/kyro/scopes/{scope}/ROADMAP.md",
|
|
9
|
+
"sprintsPath": ".agents/kyro/scopes/{scope}/phases",
|
|
10
|
+
"lastUpdated": "{date}"
|
|
11
|
+
}
|
|
@@ -1,207 +0,0 @@
|
|
|
1
|
-
# Analysis Guide
|
|
2
|
-
|
|
3
|
-
This helper guides the agent through deep analysis for different types of work. The analysis phase is the foundation of the entire sprint workflow — thoroughness here determines the quality of everything that follows.
|
|
4
|
-
|
|
5
|
-
---
|
|
6
|
-
|
|
7
|
-
## Core Principle
|
|
8
|
-
|
|
9
|
-
> **The analysis dictates the structure, not the reverse.**
|
|
10
|
-
>
|
|
11
|
-
> Do NOT start with a fixed list of categories. Explore the project first, then let the findings define the categories. If the project has 3 problem areas, there are 3 finding files. If it has 15, there are 15.
|
|
12
|
-
|
|
13
|
-
---
|
|
14
|
-
|
|
15
|
-
## Step 1 — Detect Work Type
|
|
16
|
-
|
|
17
|
-
Before analyzing, identify what kind of work this is:
|
|
18
|
-
|
|
19
|
-
| Work Type | Signals | Focus |
|
|
20
|
-
|-----------|---------|-------|
|
|
21
|
-
| **Audit / Refactor** | "analyze", "audit", "refactor", "review" | Comprehensive codebase exploration |
|
|
22
|
-
| **New Feature** | "add", "implement", "create feature" | Current state + gap analysis |
|
|
23
|
-
| **Bugfix** | "fix", "broken", "error", "regression" | Root cause analysis |
|
|
24
|
-
| **New Project** | "start from scratch", "new project", "build" | Scope definition + planning |
|
|
25
|
-
| **Tech Debt** | "clean up", "deprecated", "missing tests" | Debt inventory + prioritization |
|
|
26
|
-
|
|
27
|
-
---
|
|
28
|
-
|
|
29
|
-
## Step 2 — Analysis by Work Type
|
|
30
|
-
|
|
31
|
-
### Audit / Refactor
|
|
32
|
-
|
|
33
|
-
This is the most comprehensive analysis type. Explore the **entire** codebase systematically.
|
|
34
|
-
|
|
35
|
-
**Exploration Strategy**:
|
|
36
|
-
1. Start with the project root: directory structure, configuration files, entry points
|
|
37
|
-
2. Read key architectural files: main entry, routing, state management, data layer
|
|
38
|
-
3. Explore each major directory/module
|
|
39
|
-
4. Check test coverage and quality
|
|
40
|
-
5. Review dependencies and their versions
|
|
41
|
-
6. Look for patterns and anti-patterns
|
|
42
|
-
|
|
43
|
-
**What to look for** (examples — the actual areas emerge from the project):
|
|
44
|
-
- Architecture: layer separation, dependency direction, coupling
|
|
45
|
-
- API surface: public interfaces, consistency, documentation
|
|
46
|
-
- Component quality: reuse, composition, prop drilling, state management
|
|
47
|
-
- Type safety: any usage, missing types, type assertions
|
|
48
|
-
- Error handling: consistency, coverage, user-facing messages
|
|
49
|
-
- Testing: coverage, quality, missing tests, test patterns
|
|
50
|
-
- Documentation: inline docs, README, API docs
|
|
51
|
-
- Dependencies: outdated, unused, security vulnerabilities
|
|
52
|
-
- Performance: obvious bottlenecks, unnecessary re-renders, heavy computations
|
|
53
|
-
- Accessibility: semantic HTML, ARIA, keyboard navigation
|
|
54
|
-
|
|
55
|
-
**DO NOT** use this list as a checklist. Let the project tell you what matters.
|
|
56
|
-
|
|
57
|
-
### New Feature
|
|
58
|
-
|
|
59
|
-
Focus on understanding what exists and what needs to change.
|
|
60
|
-
|
|
61
|
-
**Exploration Strategy**:
|
|
62
|
-
1. Understand the current architecture relevant to the feature
|
|
63
|
-
2. Identify where the feature will integrate
|
|
64
|
-
3. Map existing patterns the feature should follow
|
|
65
|
-
4. Identify gaps between current state and requirements
|
|
66
|
-
|
|
67
|
-
**What to document**:
|
|
68
|
-
- Current state of related functionality
|
|
69
|
-
- Integration points (APIs, components, data flows)
|
|
70
|
-
- Patterns to follow (existing conventions)
|
|
71
|
-
- Requirements and acceptance criteria
|
|
72
|
-
- Technical risks and unknowns
|
|
73
|
-
|
|
74
|
-
### Bugfix
|
|
75
|
-
|
|
76
|
-
Focus on reproducing, understanding, and scoping the fix.
|
|
77
|
-
|
|
78
|
-
**Exploration Strategy**:
|
|
79
|
-
1. Reproduce the bug (or understand the reproduction steps)
|
|
80
|
-
2. Trace the code path involved
|
|
81
|
-
3. Identify the root cause
|
|
82
|
-
4. Assess blast radius (what else could be affected)
|
|
83
|
-
|
|
84
|
-
**What to document**:
|
|
85
|
-
- Bug description and reproduction steps
|
|
86
|
-
- Root cause analysis
|
|
87
|
-
- Affected code paths and files
|
|
88
|
-
- Related code that may have the same pattern (similar bugs)
|
|
89
|
-
- Proposed fix approach
|
|
90
|
-
- Testing strategy
|
|
91
|
-
|
|
92
|
-
### New Project
|
|
93
|
-
|
|
94
|
-
Focus on defining what will be built and how.
|
|
95
|
-
|
|
96
|
-
**Exploration Strategy**:
|
|
97
|
-
1. Understand the requirements / product idea
|
|
98
|
-
2. Research comparable projects or solutions
|
|
99
|
-
3. Define the technical stack
|
|
100
|
-
4. Plan the project structure
|
|
101
|
-
|
|
102
|
-
**What to document**:
|
|
103
|
-
- Project scope and boundaries
|
|
104
|
-
- Technical stack decisions (with justification)
|
|
105
|
-
- Proposed architecture
|
|
106
|
-
- Key design decisions
|
|
107
|
-
- Risks and unknowns
|
|
108
|
-
- Initial structure / scaffolding plan
|
|
109
|
-
|
|
110
|
-
### Tech Debt
|
|
111
|
-
|
|
112
|
-
Focus on inventorying and prioritizing existing debt.
|
|
113
|
-
|
|
114
|
-
**Exploration Strategy**:
|
|
115
|
-
1. Scan the codebase for debt indicators
|
|
116
|
-
2. Categorize debt by type and location
|
|
117
|
-
3. Assess impact of each debt item
|
|
118
|
-
4. Prioritize by impact vs effort
|
|
119
|
-
|
|
120
|
-
**What to document**:
|
|
121
|
-
- Debt inventory (categorized)
|
|
122
|
-
- Impact assessment per item
|
|
123
|
-
- Dependency relationships (which debt blocks other work)
|
|
124
|
-
- Prioritized resolution order
|
|
125
|
-
- Quick wins vs long-term refactors
|
|
126
|
-
|
|
127
|
-
---
|
|
128
|
-
|
|
129
|
-
## Step 3 — Document Findings
|
|
130
|
-
|
|
131
|
-
Each finding becomes a separate file. This is important for:
|
|
132
|
-
- **Granularity**: Each area can be addressed independently
|
|
133
|
-
- **Sprint mapping**: Each finding maps to one or more sprints
|
|
134
|
-
- **Progress tracking**: As sprints complete, findings are resolved
|
|
135
|
-
|
|
136
|
-
### Finding File Format
|
|
137
|
-
|
|
138
|
-
**Filename**: `NN-descriptive-slug.md` (e.g., `01-architecture-layers.md`, `02-api-inconsistencies.md`)
|
|
139
|
-
|
|
140
|
-
**Content**:
|
|
141
|
-
|
|
142
|
-
```
|
|
143
|
-
---
|
|
144
|
-
title: "Finding: {Title}"
|
|
145
|
-
date: "{date}"
|
|
146
|
-
updated: "{date}"
|
|
147
|
-
scope: "{scope}"
|
|
148
|
-
type: "analysis"
|
|
149
|
-
status: "active"
|
|
150
|
-
version: "1.0"
|
|
151
|
-
severity: "{critical | high | medium | low}"
|
|
152
|
-
agents:
|
|
153
|
-
- "{agent_model}"
|
|
154
|
-
tags:
|
|
155
|
-
- "{scope}"
|
|
156
|
-
- "analysis"
|
|
157
|
-
- "finding"
|
|
158
|
-
changelog:
|
|
159
|
-
- version: "1.0"
|
|
160
|
-
date: "{date}"
|
|
161
|
-
changes: ["Finding documented"]
|
|
162
|
-
related:
|
|
163
|
-
- "[[ROADMAP]]"
|
|
164
|
-
---
|
|
165
|
-
|
|
166
|
-
# Finding: {Title}
|
|
167
|
-
|
|
168
|
-
## Summary
|
|
169
|
-
|
|
170
|
-
{2-3 sentence summary of the finding}
|
|
171
|
-
|
|
172
|
-
## Severity / Impact
|
|
173
|
-
|
|
174
|
-
{critical | high | medium | low} — {Why this level}
|
|
175
|
-
|
|
176
|
-
## Details
|
|
177
|
-
|
|
178
|
-
{Detailed description of the finding. Include specific examples from the code.}
|
|
179
|
-
|
|
180
|
-
## Affected Files
|
|
181
|
-
|
|
182
|
-
- `path/to/file1.dart`
|
|
183
|
-
- `path/to/file2.dart`
|
|
184
|
-
|
|
185
|
-
## Recommendations
|
|
186
|
-
|
|
187
|
-
1. {Specific, actionable recommendation}
|
|
188
|
-
2. {Another recommendation}
|
|
189
|
-
```
|
|
190
|
-
|
|
191
|
-
### Numbering
|
|
192
|
-
|
|
193
|
-
- Use sequential numbering: `01-`, `02-`, `03-`, ...
|
|
194
|
-
- The number determines the default sprint order (finding 01 → Sprint 1)
|
|
195
|
-
- This is a suggestion, not a rule — the roadmap may reorder based on dependencies
|
|
196
|
-
|
|
197
|
-
---
|
|
198
|
-
|
|
199
|
-
## Step 4 — Determine Sprint Count
|
|
200
|
-
|
|
201
|
-
The number of sprints emerges from the number of distinct finding areas:
|
|
202
|
-
|
|
203
|
-
- **Small project / bugfix**: 1-3 findings → 1-3 sprints
|
|
204
|
-
- **Medium refactor**: 5-8 findings → 5-8 sprints
|
|
205
|
-
- **Major audit**: 10-20 findings → 10-20 sprints
|
|
206
|
-
|
|
207
|
-
Some findings may be grouped into a single sprint if they are small and related. Some large findings may be split across multiple sprints. The roadmap makes these decisions.
|