kodelyth-ecc 2.18.0 → 2.19.0

package/.cursor/skills/tdd-workflow/SKILL.md

@@ -0,0 +1,463 @@
+---
+name: tdd-workflow
+description: Use this skill when writing new features, fixing bugs, or refactoring code. Enforces test-driven development with 80%+ coverage including unit, integration, and E2E tests.
+origin: ECC
+---
+
+# Test-Driven Development Workflow
+
+This skill ensures all code development follows TDD principles with comprehensive test coverage.
+
+## When to Activate
+
+- Writing new features or functionality
+- Fixing bugs or issues
+- Refactoring existing code
+- Adding API endpoints
+- Creating new components
+
+## Core Principles
+
+### 1. Tests BEFORE Code
+ALWAYS write tests first, then implement code to make tests pass.
+
+### 2. Coverage Requirements
+- Minimum 80% coverage (unit + integration + E2E)
+- All edge cases covered
+- Error scenarios tested
+- Boundary conditions verified
+
+### 3. Test Types
+
+#### Unit Tests
+- Individual functions and utilities
+- Component logic
+- Pure functions
+- Helpers and utilities
+
+#### Integration Tests
+- API endpoints
+- Database operations
+- Service interactions
+- External API calls
+
+#### E2E Tests (Playwright)
+- Critical user flows
+- Complete workflows
+- Browser automation
+- UI interactions
+
+### 4. Git Checkpoints
+- If the repository is under Git, create a checkpoint commit after each TDD stage
+- Do not squash or rewrite these checkpoint commits until the workflow is complete
+- Each checkpoint commit message must describe the stage and the exact evidence captured
+- Count only commits created on the current active branch for the current task
+- Do not treat commits from other branches, earlier unrelated work, or distant branch history as valid checkpoint evidence
+- Before treating a checkpoint as satisfied, verify that the commit is reachable from the current `HEAD` on the active branch and belongs to the current task sequence
+- The preferred compact workflow is:
+  - one commit for failing test added and RED validated
+  - one commit for minimal fix applied and GREEN validated
+  - one optional commit for refactor complete
+- Separate evidence-only commits are not required if the test commit clearly corresponds to RED and the fix commit clearly corresponds to GREEN
+
+## TDD Workflow Steps
+
+### Step 1: Write User Journeys
+```
+As a [role], I want to [action], so that [benefit]
+
+Example:
+As a user, I want to search for markets semantically,
+so that I can find relevant markets even without exact keywords.
+```
+
+### Step 2: Generate Test Cases
+For each user journey, create comprehensive test cases:
+
+```typescript
+describe('Semantic Search', () => {
+  it('returns relevant markets for query', async () => {
+    // Test implementation
+  })
+
+  it('handles empty query gracefully', async () => {
+    // Test edge case
+  })
+
+  it('falls back to substring search when Redis unavailable', async () => {
+    // Test fallback behavior
+  })
+
+  it('sorts results by similarity score', async () => {
+    // Test sorting logic
+  })
+})
+```
+
+### Step 3: Run Tests (They Should Fail)
+```bash
+npm test
+# Tests should fail - we haven't implemented yet
+```
+
+This step is mandatory and is the RED gate for all production changes.
+
+Before modifying business logic or other production code, you must verify a valid RED state via one of these paths:
+- Runtime RED:
+  - The relevant test target compiles successfully
+  - The new or changed test is actually executed
+  - The result is RED
+- Compile-time RED:
+  - The new test newly instantiates, references, or exercises the buggy code path
+  - The compile failure is itself the intended RED signal
+- In either case, the failure is caused by the intended business-logic bug, undefined behavior, or missing implementation
+- The failure is not caused only by unrelated syntax errors, broken test setup, missing dependencies, or unrelated regressions
+
+A test that was only written but not compiled and executed does not count as RED.
+
+Do not edit production code until this RED state is confirmed.
+
+If the repository is under Git, create a checkpoint commit immediately after this stage is validated.
+Recommended commit message format:
+- `test: add reproducer for <feature or bug>`
+- This commit may also serve as the RED validation checkpoint if the reproducer was compiled and executed and failed for the intended reason
+- Verify that this checkpoint commit is on the current active branch before continuing
+
+### Step 4: Implement Code
+Write minimal code to make tests pass:
+
+```typescript
+// Implementation guided by tests
+export async function searchMarkets(query: string) {
+  // Implementation here
+}
+```
+
+If the repository is under Git, stage the minimal fix now but defer the checkpoint commit until GREEN is validated in Step 5.
+
+### Step 5: Run Tests Again
+```bash
+npm test
+# Tests should now pass
+```
+
+Rerun the same relevant test target after the fix and confirm the previously failing test is now GREEN.
+
+Only after a valid GREEN result may you proceed to refactor.
+
+If the repository is under Git, create a checkpoint commit immediately after GREEN is validated.
+Recommended commit message format:
+- `fix: <feature or bug>`
+- The fix commit may also serve as the GREEN validation checkpoint if the same relevant test target was rerun and passed
+- Verify that this checkpoint commit is on the current active branch before continuing
+
+### Step 6: Refactor
+Improve code quality while keeping tests green:
+- Remove duplication
+- Improve naming
+- Optimize performance
+- Enhance readability
+
+If the repository is under Git, create a checkpoint commit immediately after refactoring is complete and tests remain green.
+Recommended commit message format:
+- `refactor: clean up after <feature or bug> implementation`
+- Verify that this checkpoint commit is on the current active branch before considering the TDD cycle complete
+
+### Step 7: Verify Coverage
+```bash
+npm run test:coverage
+# Verify 80%+ coverage achieved
+```
+
+## Testing Patterns
+
+### Unit Test Pattern (Jest/Vitest)
+```typescript
+import { render, screen, fireEvent } from '@testing-library/react'
+import { Button } from './Button'
+
+describe('Button Component', () => {
+  it('renders with correct text', () => {
+    render(<Button>Click me</Button>)
+    expect(screen.getByText('Click me')).toBeInTheDocument()
+  })
+
+  it('calls onClick when clicked', () => {
+    const handleClick = jest.fn()
+    render(<Button onClick={handleClick}>Click</Button>)
+
+    fireEvent.click(screen.getByRole('button'))
+
+    expect(handleClick).toHaveBeenCalledTimes(1)
+  })
+
+  it('is disabled when disabled prop is true', () => {
+    render(<Button disabled>Click</Button>)
+    expect(screen.getByRole('button')).toBeDisabled()
+  })
+})
+```
+
+### API Integration Test Pattern
+```typescript
+import { NextRequest } from 'next/server'
+import { GET } from './route'
+
+describe('GET /api/markets', () => {
+  it('returns markets successfully', async () => {
+    const request = new NextRequest('http://localhost/api/markets')
+    const response = await GET(request)
+    const data = await response.json()
+
+    expect(response.status).toBe(200)
+    expect(data.success).toBe(true)
+    expect(Array.isArray(data.data)).toBe(true)
+  })
+
+  it('validates query parameters', async () => {
+    const request = new NextRequest('http://localhost/api/markets?limit=invalid')
+    const response = await GET(request)
+
+    expect(response.status).toBe(400)
+  })
+
+  it('handles database errors gracefully', async () => {
+    // Mock database failure
+    const request = new NextRequest('http://localhost/api/markets')
+    // Test error handling
+  })
+})
+```
+
+### E2E Test Pattern (Playwright)
+```typescript
+import { test, expect } from '@playwright/test'
+
+test('user can search and filter markets', async ({ page }) => {
+  // Navigate to markets page
+  await page.goto('/')
+  await page.click('a[href="/markets"]')
+
+  // Verify page loaded
+  await expect(page.locator('h1')).toContainText('Markets')
+
+  // Search for markets
+  await page.fill('input[placeholder="Search markets"]', 'election')
+
+  // Wait for debounce and results
+  await page.waitForTimeout(600)
+
+  // Verify search results displayed
+  const results = page.locator('[data-testid="market-card"]')
+  await expect(results).toHaveCount(5, { timeout: 5000 })
+
+  // Verify results contain search term
+  const firstResult = results.first()
+  await expect(firstResult).toContainText('election', { ignoreCase: true })
+
+  // Filter by status
+  await page.click('button:has-text("Active")')
+
+  // Verify filtered results
+  await expect(results).toHaveCount(3)
+})
+
+test('user can create a new market', async ({ page }) => {
+  // Login first
+  await page.goto('/creator-dashboard')
+
+  // Fill market creation form
+  await page.fill('input[name="name"]', 'Test Market')
+  await page.fill('textarea[name="description"]', 'Test description')
+  await page.fill('input[name="endDate"]', '2025-12-31')
+
+  // Submit form
+  await page.click('button[type="submit"]')
+
+  // Verify success message
+  await expect(page.locator('text=Market created successfully')).toBeVisible()
+
+  // Verify redirect to market page
+  await expect(page).toHaveURL(/\/markets\/test-market/)
+})
+```
+
+## Test File Organization
+
+```
+src/
+├── components/
+│   ├── Button/
+│   │   ├── Button.tsx
+│   │   ├── Button.test.tsx          # Unit tests
+│   │   └── Button.stories.tsx       # Storybook
+│   └── MarketCard/
+│       ├── MarketCard.tsx
+│       └── MarketCard.test.tsx
+├── app/
+│   └── api/
+│       └── markets/
+│           ├── route.ts
+│           └── route.test.ts         # Integration tests
+└── e2e/
+    ├── markets.spec.ts               # E2E tests
+    ├── trading.spec.ts
+    └── auth.spec.ts
+```
+
+## Mocking External Services
+
+### Supabase Mock
+```typescript
+jest.mock('@/lib/supabase', () => ({
+  supabase: {
+    from: jest.fn(() => ({
+      select: jest.fn(() => ({
+        eq: jest.fn(() => Promise.resolve({
+          data: [{ id: 1, name: 'Test Market' }],
+          error: null
+        }))
+      }))
+    }))
+  }
+}))
+```
+
+### Redis Mock
+```typescript
+jest.mock('@/lib/redis', () => ({
+  searchMarketsByVector: jest.fn(() => Promise.resolve([
+    { slug: 'test-market', similarity_score: 0.95 }
+  ])),
+  checkRedisHealth: jest.fn(() => Promise.resolve({ connected: true }))
+}))
+```
+
+### OpenAI Mock
+```typescript
+jest.mock('@/lib/openai', () => ({
+  generateEmbedding: jest.fn(() => Promise.resolve(
+    new Array(1536).fill(0.1) // Mock 1536-dim embedding
+  ))
+}))
+```
+
+## Test Coverage Verification
+
+### Run Coverage Report
+```bash
+npm run test:coverage
+```
+
+### Coverage Thresholds
+```json
+{
+  "jest": {
+    "coverageThresholds": {
+      "global": {
+        "branches": 80,
+        "functions": 80,
+        "lines": 80,
+        "statements": 80
+      }
+    }
+  }
+}
+```
+
+## Common Testing Mistakes to Avoid
+
+### FAIL: WRONG: Testing Implementation Details
+```typescript
+// Don't test internal state
+expect(component.state.count).toBe(5)
+```
+
+### PASS: CORRECT: Test User-Visible Behavior
+```typescript
+// Test what users see
+expect(screen.getByText('Count: 5')).toBeInTheDocument()
+```
+
+### FAIL: WRONG: Brittle Selectors
+```typescript
+// Breaks easily
+await page.click('.css-class-xyz')
+```
+
+### PASS: CORRECT: Semantic Selectors
+```typescript
+// Resilient to changes
+await page.click('button:has-text("Submit")')
+await page.click('[data-testid="submit-button"]')
+```
+
+### FAIL: WRONG: No Test Isolation
+```typescript
+// Tests depend on each other
+test('creates user', () => { /* ... */ })
+test('updates same user', () => { /* depends on previous test */ })
+```
+
+### PASS: CORRECT: Independent Tests
+```typescript
+// Each test sets up its own data
+test('creates user', () => {
+  const user = createTestUser()
+  // Test logic
+})
+
+test('updates user', () => {
+  const user = createTestUser()
+  // Update logic
+})
+```
+
+## Continuous Testing
+
+### Watch Mode During Development
+```bash
+npm test -- --watch
+# Tests run automatically on file changes
+```
+
+### Pre-Commit Hook
+```bash
+# Runs before every commit
+npm test && npm run lint
+```
+
+### CI/CD Integration
+```yaml
+# GitHub Actions
+- name: Run Tests
+  run: npm test -- --coverage
+- name: Upload Coverage
+  uses: codecov/codecov-action@v3
+```
+
+## Best Practices
+
+1. **Write Tests First** - Always TDD
+2. **One Assert Per Test** - Focus on single behavior
+3. **Descriptive Test Names** - Explain what's tested
+4. **Arrange-Act-Assert** - Clear test structure
+5. **Mock External Dependencies** - Isolate unit tests
+6. **Test Edge Cases** - Null, undefined, empty, large
+7. **Test Error Paths** - Not just happy paths
+8. **Keep Tests Fast** - Unit tests < 50ms each
+9. **Clean Up After Tests** - No side effects
+10. **Review Coverage Reports** - Identify gaps
+
+## Success Metrics
+
+- 80%+ code coverage achieved
+- All tests passing (green)
+- No skipped or disabled tests
+- Fast test execution (< 30s for unit tests)
+- E2E tests cover critical user flows
+- Tests catch bugs before production
+
+---
+
+**Remember**: Tests are not optional. They are the safety net that enables confident refactoring, rapid development, and production reliability.

package/.cursor/skills/team-builder/SKILL.md

@@ -0,0 +1,168 @@
+---
+name: team-builder
+description: Interactive agent picker for composing and dispatching parallel teams
+origin: community
+---
+
+# Team Builder
+
+Interactive menu for browsing and composing agent teams on demand. Works with flat or domain-subdirectory agent collections.
+
+## When to Use
+
+- You have multiple agent personas (markdown files) and want to pick which ones to use for a task
+- You want to compose an ad-hoc team from different domains (e.g., Security + SEO + Architecture)
+- You want to browse what agents are available before deciding
+
+## Prerequisites
+
+Agent files must be markdown files containing a persona prompt (identity, rules, workflow, deliverables). The first `# Heading` is used as the agent name and the first paragraph as the description.
+
+Both flat and subdirectory layouts are supported:
+
+**Subdirectory layout** — domain is inferred from the folder name:
+
+```
+agents/
+├── engineering/
+│   ├── security-engineer.md
+│   └── software-architect.md
+├── marketing/
+│   └── seo-specialist.md
+└── sales/
+    └── discovery-coach.md
+```
+
+**Flat layout** — domain inferred from shared filename prefixes. A prefix counts as a domain when 2+ files share it. Files with unique prefixes go to "General". Note: the algorithm splits at the first `-`, so multi-word domains (e.g., `product-management`) should use the subdirectory layout instead:
+
+```
+agents/
+├── engineering-security-engineer.md
+├── engineering-software-architect.md
+├── marketing-seo-specialist.md
+├── marketing-content-strategist.md
+├── sales-discovery-coach.md
+└── sales-outbound-strategist.md
+```
+
+## Configuration
+
+Agents are discovered via two methods, merged and deduplicated by agent name:
+
+1. **`claude agents` command** (primary) — run `claude agents` to get all agents known to the CLI, including user agents, plugin agents (e.g. `kodelyth-ecc:architect`), and built-in agents. This automatically covers ECC marketplace installs without any path configuration.
+2. **File glob** (fallback, for reading agent content) — agent markdown files are read from:
+   - `./agents/**/*.md` + `./agents/*.md` — project-local agents
+   - `~/.claude/agents/**/*.md` + `~/.claude/agents/*.md` — global user agents
+
+Earlier sources take precedence when names collide: user agents > plugin agents > built-in agents. A custom path can be used instead if the user specifies one.
+
+## How It Works
+
+### Step 1: Discover Available Agents
+
+Run `claude agents` to get the full agent list. Parse each line:
+- **Plugin agents** are prefixed with `plugin-name:` (e.g., `kodelyth-ecc:security-reviewer`). Use the part after `:` as the agent name and the plugin name as the domain.
+- **User agents** have no prefix. Read the corresponding markdown file from `~/.claude/agents/` or `./agents/` to extract the name and description.
+- **Built-in agents** (e.g., `Explore`, `Plan`) are skipped unless the user explicitly asks to include them.
+
+For user agents loaded from markdown files:
+- **Subdirectory layout:** extract the domain from the parent folder name
+- **Flat layout:** collect all filename prefixes (text before the first `-`). A prefix qualifies as a domain only if it appears in 2 or more filenames (e.g., `engineering-security-engineer.md` and `engineering-software-architect.md` both start with `engineering` → Engineering domain). Files with unique prefixes (e.g., `code-reviewer.md`, `tdd-guide.md`) are grouped under "General"
+- Extract the agent name from the first `# Heading`. If no heading is found, derive the name from the filename (strip `.md`, replace hyphens with spaces, title-case)
+- Extract a one-line summary from the first paragraph after the heading
+
+If no agents are found after running `claude agents` and probing file locations, inform the user: "No agents found. Run `claude agents` to verify your setup." Then stop.
+
+### Step 2: Present Domain Menu
+
+```
+Available agent domains:
+1. Engineering — Software Architect, Security Engineer
+2. Marketing — SEO Specialist
+3. Sales — Discovery Coach, Outbound Strategist
+
+Pick domains or name specific agents (e.g., "1,3" or "security + seo"):
+```
+
+- Skip domains with zero agents (empty directories)
+- Show agent count per domain
+
+### Step 3: Handle Selection
+
+Accept flexible input:
+- Numbers: "1,3" selects all agents from Engineering and Sales
+- Names: "security + seo" fuzzy-matches against discovered agents
+- "all from engineering" selects every agent in that domain
+
+If more than 5 agents are selected, list them alphabetically and ask the user to narrow down: "You selected N agents (max 5). Pick which to keep, or say 'first 5' to use the first five alphabetically."
+
+Confirm selection:
+```
+Selected: Security Engineer + SEO Specialist
+What should they work on? (describe the task):
+```
+
+### Step 4: Spawn Agents in Parallel
+
+1. Read each selected agent's markdown file
+2. Prompt for the task description if not already provided
+3. Spawn all agents in parallel using the Agent tool:
+   - `subagent_type: "general-purpose"`
+   - `prompt: "{agent file content}\n\nTask: {task description}"`
+   - Each agent runs independently — no inter-agent communication needed
+4. If an agent fails (error, timeout, or empty output), note the failure inline (e.g., "Security Engineer: failed — [reason]") and continue with results from agents that succeeded
+
+### Step 5: Synthesize Results
+
+Collect all outputs and present a unified report:
+- Results grouped by agent
+- Synthesis section highlighting:
+  - Agreements across agents
+  - Conflicts or tensions between recommendations
+  - Recommended next steps
+
+If only 1 agent was selected, skip synthesis and present the output directly.
+
+## Rules
+
+- **Dynamic discovery only.** Never hardcode agent lists. New files in the directory auto-appear in the menu.
+- **Max 5 agents per team.** More than 5 produces diminishing returns and excessive token usage. Enforce at selection time.
+- **Parallel dispatch.** All agents run simultaneously — use the Agent tool's parallel invocation pattern.
+- **Parallel Agent calls, not TeamCreate.** This skill uses parallel Agent tool calls for independent work. TeamCreate (a Claude Code tool for multi-agent dialogue) is only needed when agents must debate or respond to each other.
+
+## Examples
+
+```
+User: team builder
+
+Claude:
+Available agent domains:
+1. Engineering (2) — Software Architect, Security Engineer
+2. Marketing (1) — SEO Specialist
+3. Sales (4) — Discovery Coach, Outbound Strategist, Proposal Strategist, Sales Engineer
+4. Support (1) — Executive Summary
+
+Pick domains or name specific agents:
+
+User: security + seo
+
+Claude:
+Selected: Security Engineer + SEO Specialist
+What should they work on?
+
+User: Review my Next.js e-commerce site before launch
+
+[Both agents spawn in parallel, each applying their specialty to the codebase]
+
+Claude:
+## Security Engineer Findings
+- [findings...]
+
+## SEO Specialist Findings
+- [findings...]
+
+## Synthesis
+Both agents agree on: [...]
+Tension: Security recommends CSP that blocks inline styles, SEO needs inline schema markup. Resolution: [...]
+Next steps: [...]
+```