kiro-agents 1.0.0
This diff represents the content of publicly available package versions that have been released to one of the supported registries. The information contained in this diff is provided for informational purposes only and reflects changes between package versions as they appear in their respective public registries.
- package/README.md +223 -0
- package/bin/cli.ts +74 -0
- package/dist/agent-system/interactions/chit-chat.md +212 -0
- package/dist/agent-system/interactions/interaction-styles.md +162 -0
- package/dist/agent-system/kiro-spec-mode.md +268 -0
- package/dist/agent-system/kiro-vibe-mode.md +298 -0
- package/dist/agent-system/strict-mode.md +96 -0
- package/dist/agent-system/tools/client-tools.md +21 -0
- package/dist/agent-system.md +512 -0
- package/dist/modes-system.md +368 -0
- package/package.json +30 -0
package/README.md
ADDED
|
@@ -0,0 +1,223 @@
|
|
|
1
|
+
# kiro-agents
|
|
2
|
+
|
|
3
|
+
Advanced AI agent system for Kiro IDE that enhances your development workflow with minimal cognitive overhead.
|
|
4
|
+
|
|
5
|
+
## What is kiro-agents?
|
|
6
|
+
|
|
7
|
+
kiro-agents is a steering document system that extends Kiro IDE with:
|
|
8
|
+
|
|
9
|
+
- **Agent System** - Create and manage specialized AI agents with `/agent` and `/agents` commands
|
|
10
|
+
- **Mode System** - Switch between interaction styles with `/mode` command (vibe/spec modes)
|
|
11
|
+
- **Strict Mode** - Precision mode for experimental development with `/strict` command
|
|
12
|
+
- **Interactive Workflows** - Choice-based interactions that minimize cognitive load
|
|
13
|
+
- **Progressive Enhancement** - Start minimal, add agents as needed
|
|
14
|
+
|
|
15
|
+
## Installation
|
|
16
|
+
|
|
17
|
+
```bash
|
|
18
|
+
npx kiro-agents
|
|
19
|
+
# or
|
|
20
|
+
bunx kiro-agents
|
|
21
|
+
```
|
|
22
|
+
|
|
23
|
+
This installs steering documents to `~/.kiro/steering/` that enhance Kiro's AI capabilities.
|
|
24
|
+
|
|
25
|
+
## Core Features
|
|
26
|
+
|
|
27
|
+
### Agent System
|
|
28
|
+
|
|
29
|
+
Create specialized AI agents for different tasks. Each agent has:
|
|
30
|
+
|
|
31
|
+
- Defined capabilities and responsibilities
|
|
32
|
+
- Custom interaction protocols
|
|
33
|
+
- Specific workflows and tools
|
|
34
|
+
- Integration with other agents
|
|
35
|
+
|
|
36
|
+
**Commands:**
|
|
37
|
+
- `/agents` - Interactive agent management (create, activate, manage agents)
|
|
38
|
+
- `/agent {name}` - Activate specific agent directly
|
|
39
|
+
|
|
40
|
+
**Example workflow:**
|
|
41
|
+
```
|
|
42
|
+
User: /agents
|
|
43
|
+
AI: [Shows available agents with numbered choices]
|
|
44
|
+
User: 2 (Create new agent)
|
|
45
|
+
AI: [Guides through agent creation wizard]
|
|
46
|
+
```
|
|
47
|
+
|
|
48
|
+
Agents are stored in `.kiro/agents/` and can be:
|
|
49
|
+
- Created interactively through wizard
|
|
50
|
+
- Modified and updated
|
|
51
|
+
- Activated on-demand
|
|
52
|
+
- Coordinated with other agents
|
|
53
|
+
|
|
54
|
+
### Mode System
|
|
55
|
+
|
|
56
|
+
Switch between interaction styles based on your needs:
|
|
57
|
+
|
|
58
|
+
**Vibe Mode** - Flexible, conversational development
|
|
59
|
+
- Quick iterations and prototyping
|
|
60
|
+
- Direct code changes
|
|
61
|
+
- Exploratory development
|
|
62
|
+
- Minimal ceremony
|
|
63
|
+
|
|
64
|
+
**Spec Mode** - Structured feature development
|
|
65
|
+
- Formal requirements (EARS/INCOSE compliant)
|
|
66
|
+
- Design with correctness properties
|
|
67
|
+
- Task-based implementation
|
|
68
|
+
- Property-based testing focus
|
|
69
|
+
|
|
70
|
+
**Commands:**
|
|
71
|
+
- `/modes` - Interactive mode management
|
|
72
|
+
- `/mode vibe` - Switch to flexible development
|
|
73
|
+
- `/mode spec` - Switch to structured planning
|
|
74
|
+
|
|
75
|
+
### Strict Mode
|
|
76
|
+
|
|
77
|
+
Precision mode for experimental or critical development:
|
|
78
|
+
|
|
79
|
+
- Blocks execution on ambiguous input
|
|
80
|
+
- Requires explicit clarification
|
|
81
|
+
- Prevents assumption propagation
|
|
82
|
+
- Ideal for architectural decisions
|
|
83
|
+
|
|
84
|
+
**Commands:**
|
|
85
|
+
- `/strict on` - Activate precision mode
|
|
86
|
+
- `/strict off` - Return to normal mode
|
|
87
|
+
|
|
88
|
+
### Interactive Workflows
|
|
89
|
+
|
|
90
|
+
All interactions use choice-based patterns:
|
|
91
|
+
|
|
92
|
+
- Numbered options (typically 4-6, up to 16 when needed)
|
|
93
|
+
- Visual progress indicators (diff blocks)
|
|
94
|
+
- Single focus per interaction
|
|
95
|
+
- Minimal cognitive load
|
|
96
|
+
|
|
97
|
+
This design reduces decision fatigue and maintains context during long conversations.
|
|
98
|
+
|
|
99
|
+
## How It Works
|
|
100
|
+
|
|
101
|
+
kiro-agents installs markdown files to `~/.kiro/steering/` that Kiro loads as steering documents. These documents:
|
|
102
|
+
|
|
103
|
+
1. Define new slash commands (`/agent`, `/mode`, `/strict`, etc.)
|
|
104
|
+
2. Provide protocols for AI behavior
|
|
105
|
+
3. Enable agent and mode systems
|
|
106
|
+
4. Optimize interactions for reduced cognitive load
|
|
107
|
+
|
|
108
|
+
The system adds minimal overhead to initial context while enabling progressive enhancement through agent creation.
|
|
109
|
+
|
|
110
|
+
## File Structure After Installation
|
|
111
|
+
|
|
112
|
+
```
|
|
113
|
+
~/.kiro/steering/
|
|
114
|
+
├── agent-system.md # Core agent system
|
|
115
|
+
├── modes-system.md # Mode switching system
|
|
116
|
+
└── agent-system/
|
|
117
|
+
├── strict-mode.md # Precision mode
|
|
118
|
+
├── kiro-spec-mode.md # Spec mode protocols
|
|
119
|
+
├── kiro-vibe-mode.md # Vibe mode protocols
|
|
120
|
+
├── interactions/
|
|
121
|
+
│ ├── chit-chat.md # Interactive workflows
|
|
122
|
+
│ └── interaction-styles.md
|
|
123
|
+
└── tools/
|
|
124
|
+
└── client-tools.md
|
|
125
|
+
```
|
|
126
|
+
|
|
127
|
+
Files are set to read-only after installation to prevent accidental modifications.
|
|
128
|
+
|
|
129
|
+
## Usage Examples
|
|
130
|
+
|
|
131
|
+
### Creating a Custom Agent
|
|
132
|
+
|
|
133
|
+
```
|
|
134
|
+
User: /agents
|
|
135
|
+
AI: [Shows agent management options]
|
|
136
|
+
User: 2 (Create new agent)
|
|
137
|
+
AI: What type of agent? [Shows options]
|
|
138
|
+
User: 1 (Code-focused agent)
|
|
139
|
+
AI: [Collects name, capabilities, workflows]
|
|
140
|
+
AI: Agent created! Activate now? [Yes/No]
|
|
141
|
+
```
|
|
142
|
+
|
|
143
|
+
### Switching Modes
|
|
144
|
+
|
|
145
|
+
```
|
|
146
|
+
User: /mode spec
|
|
147
|
+
AI: [Loads spec mode protocols]
|
|
148
|
+
AI: What feature do you want to work on?
|
|
149
|
+
User: User authentication system
|
|
150
|
+
AI: [Guides through requirements → design → tasks]
|
|
151
|
+
```
|
|
152
|
+
|
|
153
|
+
### Using Strict Mode
|
|
154
|
+
|
|
155
|
+
```
|
|
156
|
+
User: /strict on
|
|
157
|
+
AI: Strict mode activated
|
|
158
|
+
User: Add caching to the API
|
|
159
|
+
AI: [Asks clarifying questions about cache strategy, TTL, invalidation, etc.]
|
|
160
|
+
```
|
|
161
|
+
|
|
162
|
+
### Agent Coordination
|
|
163
|
+
|
|
164
|
+
```
|
|
165
|
+
User: /mode spec
|
|
166
|
+
[Work on feature planning]
|
|
167
|
+
User: /agent kiro-master
|
|
168
|
+
[Use kiro-master capabilities while in spec mode]
|
|
169
|
+
```
|
|
170
|
+
|
|
171
|
+
## Key Benefits
|
|
172
|
+
|
|
173
|
+
**Minimal Initial Overhead**
|
|
174
|
+
- Core system adds small context footprint
|
|
175
|
+
- Agents created progressively as needed
|
|
176
|
+
- Only load what you use
|
|
177
|
+
|
|
178
|
+
**Reduced Cognitive Load**
|
|
179
|
+
- Choice-based interactions
|
|
180
|
+
- Visual progress tracking
|
|
181
|
+
- Single focus per message
|
|
182
|
+
- Clear context maintenance
|
|
183
|
+
|
|
184
|
+
**Flexible Workflows**
|
|
185
|
+
- Switch between modes as needs change
|
|
186
|
+
- Combine modes with agents
|
|
187
|
+
- Adapt to your working style
|
|
188
|
+
|
|
189
|
+
**Extensible System**
|
|
190
|
+
- Create custom agents for your needs
|
|
191
|
+
- Define specialized workflows
|
|
192
|
+
- Integrate with existing Kiro features
|
|
193
|
+
|
|
194
|
+
## Advanced Features
|
|
195
|
+
|
|
196
|
+
### Agent Coordination
|
|
197
|
+
|
|
198
|
+
Multiple agents can work together:
|
|
199
|
+
- Handoff procedures between agents
|
|
200
|
+
- Context sharing across agents
|
|
201
|
+
- Conflict resolution protocols
|
|
202
|
+
- Collaborative workflows
|
|
203
|
+
|
|
204
|
+
### Mode + Agent Combinations
|
|
205
|
+
|
|
206
|
+
Modes and agents work together:
|
|
207
|
+
- Agents inherit mode protocols
|
|
208
|
+
- Mode workflows use agent capabilities
|
|
209
|
+
- Context preserved across switches
|
|
210
|
+
|
|
211
|
+
## Contributing
|
|
212
|
+
|
|
213
|
+
This is an experimental system that relies on AI understanding and following instructions. Feedback and improvements welcome!
|
|
214
|
+
|
|
215
|
+
## License
|
|
216
|
+
|
|
217
|
+
MIT
|
|
218
|
+
|
|
219
|
+
## Links
|
|
220
|
+
|
|
221
|
+
- [GitHub Repository](https://github.com/theadd/kiro-agents)
|
|
222
|
+
- [npm Package](https://www.npmjs.com/package/kiro-agents)
|
|
223
|
+
- [Kiro IDE](https://kiro.dev)
|
package/bin/cli.ts
ADDED
|
@@ -0,0 +1,74 @@
|
|
|
1
|
+
#!/usr/bin/env bun
|
|
2
|
+
import { join } from "path";
|
|
3
|
+
import { homedir } from "os";
|
|
4
|
+
import { existsSync, chmodSync, constants } from "fs";
|
|
5
|
+
|
|
6
|
+
const INSTALL_DIR = join(homedir(), ".kiro", "steering");
|
|
7
|
+
|
|
8
|
+
// Files to install (relative to dist/ in package)
|
|
9
|
+
const FILES_TO_INSTALL = [
|
|
10
|
+
"agent-system.md",
|
|
11
|
+
"modes-system.md",
|
|
12
|
+
"agent-system/strict-mode.md",
|
|
13
|
+
"agent-system/kiro-spec-mode.md",
|
|
14
|
+
"agent-system/kiro-vibe-mode.md",
|
|
15
|
+
"agent-system/interactions/chit-chat.md",
|
|
16
|
+
"agent-system/interactions/interaction-styles.md",
|
|
17
|
+
"agent-system/tools/client-tools.md",
|
|
18
|
+
] as const;
|
|
19
|
+
|
|
20
|
+
async function setWritable(filePath: string): Promise<void> {
|
|
21
|
+
try {
|
|
22
|
+
chmodSync(filePath, constants.S_IRUSR | constants.S_IWUSR | constants.S_IRGRP | constants.S_IROTH);
|
|
23
|
+
} catch (error) {
|
|
24
|
+
// Ignore errors if file doesn't exist
|
|
25
|
+
}
|
|
26
|
+
}
|
|
27
|
+
|
|
28
|
+
async function setReadOnly(filePath: string): Promise<void> {
|
|
29
|
+
try {
|
|
30
|
+
chmodSync(filePath, constants.S_IRUSR | constants.S_IRGRP | constants.S_IROTH);
|
|
31
|
+
} catch (error) {
|
|
32
|
+
console.warn(`⚠️ Could not set read-only: ${filePath}`);
|
|
33
|
+
}
|
|
34
|
+
}
|
|
35
|
+
|
|
36
|
+
async function installFile(relativePath: string): Promise<void> {
|
|
37
|
+
const destPath = join(INSTALL_DIR, relativePath);
|
|
38
|
+
|
|
39
|
+
// Restore write permissions if file exists
|
|
40
|
+
if (existsSync(destPath)) {
|
|
41
|
+
await setWritable(destPath);
|
|
42
|
+
}
|
|
43
|
+
|
|
44
|
+
// Get source file from package dist/
|
|
45
|
+
const srcPath = join(import.meta.dir, "..", "dist", relativePath);
|
|
46
|
+
const srcFile = Bun.file(srcPath);
|
|
47
|
+
|
|
48
|
+
// Write file
|
|
49
|
+
await Bun.write(destPath, srcFile, { createPath: true });
|
|
50
|
+
|
|
51
|
+
// Set read-only
|
|
52
|
+
await setReadOnly(destPath);
|
|
53
|
+
|
|
54
|
+
console.log(`✅ Installed: ${relativePath}`);
|
|
55
|
+
}
|
|
56
|
+
|
|
57
|
+
async function install(): Promise<void> {
|
|
58
|
+
console.log("📦 Installing kiro-agents to ~/.kiro/steering/\n");
|
|
59
|
+
|
|
60
|
+
// Install all files
|
|
61
|
+
for (const file of FILES_TO_INSTALL) {
|
|
62
|
+
await installFile(file);
|
|
63
|
+
}
|
|
64
|
+
|
|
65
|
+
console.log("\n✨ Installation completed successfully!");
|
|
66
|
+
console.log(`\n📁 Files installed to: ${INSTALL_DIR}`);
|
|
67
|
+
console.log("\n💡 Files are set to read-only. To modify them, change permissions first.");
|
|
68
|
+
}
|
|
69
|
+
|
|
70
|
+
// Main execution
|
|
71
|
+
install().catch((error) => {
|
|
72
|
+
console.error("❌ Installation failed:", error);
|
|
73
|
+
process.exit(1);
|
|
74
|
+
});
|
|
@@ -0,0 +1,212 @@
|
|
|
1
|
+
---
|
|
2
|
+
inclusion: manual
|
|
3
|
+
---
|
|
4
|
+
|
|
5
|
+
# Interactive Chat Mode for ADHD-C Users
|
|
6
|
+
|
|
7
|
+
## Purpose
|
|
8
|
+
This steering document enables **chit-chat** conversational mode for neurodivergent users with **ADHD-C** who experience difficulty maintaining context during extended conversations.
|
|
9
|
+
|
|
10
|
+
## Core Principles
|
|
11
|
+
|
|
12
|
+
### Single-Point Focus
|
|
13
|
+
- Address **one topic per message** to minimize cognitive load
|
|
14
|
+
- Break complex tasks into discrete, manageable steps
|
|
15
|
+
- Only combine topics when separation would reduce comprehension
|
|
16
|
+
|
|
17
|
+
### Context Recovery System
|
|
18
|
+
Every AI response **MUST** start with a **diff code block** showing task progress:
|
|
19
|
+
|
|
20
|
+
```diff
|
|
21
|
+
[💤 task_on_hold] ← (+num_additional_tasks_on_hold) ← [💤 last_task_on_hold]
|
|
22
|
+
- ✅ completed_step_from_last_turn → *brief_comment_if_needed*
|
|
23
|
+
👉 step_being_handled_this_turn
|
|
24
|
+
⏳ next_step_in_sequence → *brief_comment_if_needed*
|
|
25
|
+
⏳ second_next_step_in_sequence
|
|
26
|
+
+ 🆕 new_step_shown_first_time_this_turn ← (+num_remaining_steps_not_shown)
|
|
27
|
+
```
|
|
28
|
+
|
|
29
|
+
**Critical Rules**:
|
|
30
|
+
- **Same step text** - Each step MUST maintain exactly the same topic text across all diff blocks
|
|
31
|
+
- **Linear progression** - Steps follow logical sequence, not diff replacement format
|
|
32
|
+
- **Consistent positioning** - Steps maintain their relative order in the sequence
|
|
33
|
+
- **On-hold tasks** - Show suspended tasks at top when switching contexts
|
|
34
|
+
- **New steps** - Only add new steps when they genuinely appear for first time
|
|
35
|
+
|
|
36
|
+
### Response Structure Requirements
|
|
37
|
+
|
|
38
|
+
**Mandatory Format**:
|
|
39
|
+
1. **Diff block** - Task status overview
|
|
40
|
+
2. **Single topic** - Current focus area
|
|
41
|
+
3. **Multiple choice** - Numbered response options
|
|
42
|
+
|
|
43
|
+
### User Response Optimization
|
|
44
|
+
|
|
45
|
+
**Choice-Based Interaction**:
|
|
46
|
+
- Provide **numbered lists** for user responses
|
|
47
|
+
- Eliminate need for custom text input when possible
|
|
48
|
+
- **4-6 options as guideline** (use fewer if they cover all relevant cases)
|
|
49
|
+
- **Up to 16 options maximum** when scope requires comprehensive coverage
|
|
50
|
+
- Maximum **180 characters** per option
|
|
51
|
+
|
|
52
|
+
**Partial Response Strategy**:
|
|
53
|
+
- If options exceed limits, provide **partial responses**
|
|
54
|
+
- User selects partial option → AI continues that specific thread
|
|
55
|
+
- Maintain choice constraints in follow-up messages
|
|
56
|
+
|
|
57
|
+
## Implementation Guidelines
|
|
58
|
+
|
|
59
|
+
### Message Flow
|
|
60
|
+
1. **Status check** - Show progress via diff block
|
|
61
|
+
2. **Focus delivery** - Address current topic only
|
|
62
|
+
3. **Choice provision** - Offer structured response options
|
|
63
|
+
4. **Context preservation** - Maintain thread continuity
|
|
64
|
+
|
|
65
|
+
### Cognitive Load Management
|
|
66
|
+
- **Visual formatting** - Use bold, emphasis, code blocks
|
|
67
|
+
- **Clear structure** - Logical information hierarchy
|
|
68
|
+
- **Explicit outcomes** - State what was accomplished
|
|
69
|
+
- **Minimal text blocks** - Break up dense information
|
|
70
|
+
|
|
71
|
+
### Context Reference Rules
|
|
72
|
+
- **Inline context** - When referencing previous points, include brief clarification in *italics*
|
|
73
|
+
- **Code identifiers** - Format as markdown links: [`identifier`](relative-path:line)
|
|
74
|
+
- **Avoid orphaned references** - Don't reference content requiring scroll-back to understand
|
|
75
|
+
|
|
76
|
+
### Multi-Part Explanations (CRITICAL)
|
|
77
|
+
|
|
78
|
+
When explaining complex topics, **NEVER dump everything at once**. Use **progressive disclosure**:
|
|
79
|
+
|
|
80
|
+
## MANDATORY STOP System (Simplified)
|
|
81
|
+
|
|
82
|
+
**Core Principle**: Prevent cognitive overload while respecting natural content boundaries.
|
|
83
|
+
|
|
84
|
+
### Content Monitoring Rules
|
|
85
|
+
|
|
86
|
+
**When to start counting**:
|
|
87
|
+
1. After diff block is written
|
|
88
|
+
2. After 3+ lines of alphanumeric content (indicates user response started)
|
|
89
|
+
3. Tool usage resets counter to 0 (work-in-progress protection)
|
|
90
|
+
|
|
91
|
+
**What counts as content**:
|
|
92
|
+
- Regular text paragraphs: 1 line = 1 count
|
|
93
|
+
- Code blocks, bullets (- ✅): 3 lines = 1 count (lower cognitive load)
|
|
94
|
+
- Headers (##), symbols-only: 0 count
|
|
95
|
+
- Tool calls: Reset counter completely
|
|
96
|
+
|
|
97
|
+
**Threshold for stopping**:
|
|
98
|
+
- Dense explanation/analysis: ~20 lines of content
|
|
99
|
+
- Complex multi-concept content: ~15 lines of content
|
|
100
|
+
- Abstract theory without examples: ~12 lines of content
|
|
101
|
+
|
|
102
|
+
### Natural Break Detection (CRITICAL)
|
|
103
|
+
|
|
104
|
+
**When threshold reached**:
|
|
105
|
+
1. Enter "stopping mode" - look for natural break point
|
|
106
|
+
2. Continue until finding: paragraph end, list end, section break, code block end
|
|
107
|
+
3. **NEVER stop mid-sentence, mid-list, or mid-code block**
|
|
108
|
+
4. If no natural break within +5 lines, force stop with clear continuation note
|
|
109
|
+
|
|
110
|
+
**Work-in-Progress Protection**:
|
|
111
|
+
- Tool sequences with brief context: Counter stays at 0
|
|
112
|
+
- Implementation work: Protected from stopping
|
|
113
|
+
- Sequential corrections: Maintain momentum
|
|
114
|
+
|
|
115
|
+
### Auto-Apply Rules
|
|
116
|
+
|
|
117
|
+
**For any user language**:
|
|
118
|
+
- Navigation options in user's communication language
|
|
119
|
+
- Technical terms remain in English
|
|
120
|
+
- Adapt examples to user's language context
|
|
121
|
+
|
|
122
|
+
**For analysis requests**:
|
|
123
|
+
- Start with "Part 1A: [first aspect]"
|
|
124
|
+
- One problem/concept per part
|
|
125
|
+
- Progressive disclosure mandatory
|
|
126
|
+
|
|
127
|
+
**For tutorials/explanations**:
|
|
128
|
+
- Break into logical parts (1A, 1B, 1C)
|
|
129
|
+
- Include concrete examples
|
|
130
|
+
- Maintain engagement with interaction points
|
|
131
|
+
|
|
132
|
+
## Conflict Resolution
|
|
133
|
+
|
|
134
|
+
**ADHD-C Priority Override** (highest priority):
|
|
135
|
+
- User cognitive load > System efficiency
|
|
136
|
+
- Fragmented responses > Complete dumps
|
|
137
|
+
- Context maintenance > Response brevity
|
|
138
|
+
|
|
139
|
+
**Instruction Hierarchy**:
|
|
140
|
+
1. **ADHD-C Support** → Overrides ALL other instructions
|
|
141
|
+
2. **Chit-Chat Rules** → Overrides system efficiency goals
|
|
142
|
+
3. **Core AI Protocols** → Overrides response style preferences
|
|
143
|
+
4. **System Identity** → Adapts to support user needs
|
|
144
|
+
|
|
145
|
+
**Pattern for Long Explanations**:
|
|
146
|
+
1. **Break into logical parts** (Part 1A, 1B, 1C, etc.)
|
|
147
|
+
2. **Explain ONE concept at a time** - Focus on cognitive load, not line count
|
|
148
|
+
3. **Always include navigation options** (in user's language):
|
|
149
|
+
- "Continue explanation" → Next part
|
|
150
|
+
- "Skip to summary" → Jump to summary and next steps
|
|
151
|
+
- "Ask about this part" → Clarify current section
|
|
152
|
+
- "Go implement" → Skip explanation, start coding
|
|
153
|
+
|
|
154
|
+
**Example Multi-Part Structure**:
|
|
155
|
+
```markdown
|
|
156
|
+
## Part 1A: Core Concept
|
|
157
|
+
|
|
158
|
+
[Concise explanation of first concept - focus on clarity, not line limits]
|
|
159
|
+
|
|
160
|
+
**What do you want to do?**
|
|
161
|
+
1. **Continue explanation** - Part 1B: Next concept
|
|
162
|
+
2. **Skip to summary** - Recap and next steps
|
|
163
|
+
3. **Ask about this part** - Clarify current concept
|
|
164
|
+
4. **Go implement directly** - Start coding now
|
|
165
|
+
```
|
|
166
|
+
|
|
167
|
+
**System Principles** (validated through use):
|
|
168
|
+
- **Content-based monitoring**: Track real cognitive load, not arbitrary line counts
|
|
169
|
+
- **Natural break respect**: Never interrupt mid-sentence, mid-list, or mid-code
|
|
170
|
+
- **Work protection**: Tool sequences don't trigger stopping
|
|
171
|
+
- **Language adaptation**: Navigation and interaction in user's communication language
|
|
172
|
+
- **ADHD-C priority**: User needs override system efficiency goals
|
|
173
|
+
|
|
174
|
+
**After Final Part**:
|
|
175
|
+
- **ALWAYS provide recap** of where we were before explanation
|
|
176
|
+
- **ALWAYS list concrete next steps** to continue work
|
|
177
|
+
- Keep recap brief (3-5 bullet points max)
|
|
178
|
+
|
|
179
|
+
**Anti-Pattern (NEVER DO THIS)**:
|
|
180
|
+
```markdown
|
|
181
|
+
❌ [Massive wall of text covering 3 or more different concepts]
|
|
182
|
+
❌ [No clear sections or breaks]
|
|
183
|
+
❌ [Options only at the very end]
|
|
184
|
+
❌ [No way to navigate through explanation]
|
|
185
|
+
❌ [Responses >80 lines without multi-part structure]
|
|
186
|
+
❌ [Different step text for same concept across diff blocks]
|
|
187
|
+
❌ [Non-linear step progression in diff blocks]
|
|
188
|
+
```
|
|
189
|
+
|
|
190
|
+
## Example Response Pattern
|
|
191
|
+
|
|
192
|
+
```diff
|
|
193
|
+
[💤 Previous task analysis]
|
|
194
|
+
- ✅ Component structure defined
|
|
195
|
+
👉 Implementation approach selection
|
|
196
|
+
⏳ Code generation
|
|
197
|
+
⏳ Testing strategy
|
|
198
|
+
⏳ Documentation updates
|
|
199
|
+
```
|
|
200
|
+
|
|
201
|
+
**Current Focus**: JSX component implementation approach
|
|
202
|
+
|
|
203
|
+
**Choose your preferred pattern**:
|
|
204
|
+
1. Functional component with hooks
|
|
205
|
+
2. Class-based component
|
|
206
|
+
3. Higher-order component wrapper
|
|
207
|
+
4. Custom hook abstraction
|
|
208
|
+
5. Compound component pattern *eliminates basic abstraction we discussed*
|
|
209
|
+
6. Need more details about patterns
|
|
210
|
+
|
|
211
|
+
## Activation
|
|
212
|
+
This mode is **automatically activated** when loaded in a conversation. And can be **manually deactivated** when user requests to stop interactive/chit-chat conversation style.
|
|
@@ -0,0 +1,162 @@
|
|
|
1
|
+
---
|
|
2
|
+
inclusion: manual
|
|
3
|
+
---
|
|
4
|
+
|
|
5
|
+
# Available Interaction Styles
|
|
6
|
+
|
|
7
|
+
## 1. Chit-Chat Mode (Interactive)
|
|
8
|
+
|
|
9
|
+
**Best for**: ADHD-C users, complex workflows, step-by-step guidance
|
|
10
|
+
|
|
11
|
+
**Characteristics**:
|
|
12
|
+
|
|
13
|
+
- Diff blocks showing progress at start of each response
|
|
14
|
+
- Numbered choice lists (4-6 options, up to 16 max)
|
|
15
|
+
- Single focus per message
|
|
16
|
+
- Visual formatting (bold, code blocks)
|
|
17
|
+
- Context recovery system
|
|
18
|
+
|
|
19
|
+
**Example agents**: kiro-manager
|
|
20
|
+
|
|
21
|
+
**When to use**:
|
|
22
|
+
|
|
23
|
+
- Multi-step workflows
|
|
24
|
+
- Decision-heavy processes
|
|
25
|
+
- User needs guidance through options
|
|
26
|
+
- Complex feature management
|
|
27
|
+
|
|
28
|
+
---
|
|
29
|
+
|
|
30
|
+
## 2. Direct Execution Mode
|
|
31
|
+
|
|
32
|
+
**Best for**: Code-focused agents, quick tasks, minimal interaction
|
|
33
|
+
|
|
34
|
+
**Characteristics**:
|
|
35
|
+
|
|
36
|
+
- Executes immediately without asking
|
|
37
|
+
- Provides results and brief explanation
|
|
38
|
+
- Minimal back-and-forth
|
|
39
|
+
- Assumes user knows what they want
|
|
40
|
+
|
|
41
|
+
**Example use cases**: Refactoring agent, formatter agent, linter agent
|
|
42
|
+
|
|
43
|
+
**When to use**:
|
|
44
|
+
|
|
45
|
+
- Clear, unambiguous tasks
|
|
46
|
+
- Automated processes
|
|
47
|
+
- Expert users who know exactly what they need
|
|
48
|
+
|
|
49
|
+
---
|
|
50
|
+
|
|
51
|
+
## 3. Consultative Mode
|
|
52
|
+
|
|
53
|
+
**Best for**: Architecture decisions, design reviews, analysis
|
|
54
|
+
|
|
55
|
+
**Characteristics**:
|
|
56
|
+
|
|
57
|
+
- Asks clarifying questions first
|
|
58
|
+
- Provides recommendations with rationale
|
|
59
|
+
- Explains tradeoffs
|
|
60
|
+
- Waits for user approval before acting
|
|
61
|
+
|
|
62
|
+
**Example use cases**: API designer, architecture reviewer, security auditor
|
|
63
|
+
|
|
64
|
+
**When to use**:
|
|
65
|
+
|
|
66
|
+
- High-impact decisions
|
|
67
|
+
- Multiple valid approaches exist
|
|
68
|
+
- User needs expert guidance
|
|
69
|
+
- Tradeoffs need discussion
|
|
70
|
+
|
|
71
|
+
---
|
|
72
|
+
|
|
73
|
+
## 4. Wizard Mode (Step-by-Step)
|
|
74
|
+
|
|
75
|
+
**Best for**: Setup processes, configuration, scaffolding
|
|
76
|
+
|
|
77
|
+
**Characteristics**:
|
|
78
|
+
|
|
79
|
+
- Linear progression through steps
|
|
80
|
+
- Collects information incrementally
|
|
81
|
+
- Shows progress indicator
|
|
82
|
+
- Validates each step before proceeding
|
|
83
|
+
|
|
84
|
+
**Example use cases**: Project setup agent, configuration wizard, onboarding agent
|
|
85
|
+
|
|
86
|
+
**When to use**:
|
|
87
|
+
|
|
88
|
+
- Multi-step setup processes
|
|
89
|
+
- Information gathering needed
|
|
90
|
+
- Order matters
|
|
91
|
+
- Validation at each step
|
|
92
|
+
|
|
93
|
+
---
|
|
94
|
+
|
|
95
|
+
## 5. Hybrid Mode
|
|
96
|
+
|
|
97
|
+
**Best for**: Flexible agents that adapt to context
|
|
98
|
+
|
|
99
|
+
**Characteristics**:
|
|
100
|
+
|
|
101
|
+
- Combines multiple styles
|
|
102
|
+
- Adapts based on task complexity
|
|
103
|
+
- Simple tasks → Direct execution
|
|
104
|
+
- Complex tasks → Chit-chat or consultative
|
|
105
|
+
|
|
106
|
+
**Example agents**: kiro-manager-hybrid
|
|
107
|
+
|
|
108
|
+
**When to use**:
|
|
109
|
+
|
|
110
|
+
- Agent handles diverse tasks
|
|
111
|
+
- Task complexity varies
|
|
112
|
+
- Want flexibility
|
|
113
|
+
|
|
114
|
+
---
|
|
115
|
+
|
|
116
|
+
## 6. Documentation Mode
|
|
117
|
+
|
|
118
|
+
**Best for**: Writing, explaining, teaching
|
|
119
|
+
|
|
120
|
+
**Characteristics**:
|
|
121
|
+
|
|
122
|
+
- Comprehensive explanations
|
|
123
|
+
- Examples and code snippets
|
|
124
|
+
- Structured output (headers, sections)
|
|
125
|
+
- Progressive disclosure for long content
|
|
126
|
+
|
|
127
|
+
**Example use cases**: Documentation writer, tutorial creator, explainer agent
|
|
128
|
+
|
|
129
|
+
**When to use**:
|
|
130
|
+
|
|
131
|
+
- Creating documentation
|
|
132
|
+
- Teaching concepts
|
|
133
|
+
- Explaining complex topics
|
|
134
|
+
|
|
135
|
+
---
|
|
136
|
+
|
|
137
|
+
## Mixing Styles
|
|
138
|
+
|
|
139
|
+
You can combine elements from different styles:
|
|
140
|
+
|
|
141
|
+
**Example**: Consultative + Chit-Chat
|
|
142
|
+
|
|
143
|
+
- Ask clarifying questions (consultative)
|
|
144
|
+
- Use diff blocks and numbered choices (chit-chat)
|
|
145
|
+
- Single focus per message (chit-chat)
|
|
146
|
+
|
|
147
|
+
**Example**: Direct Execution + Documentation
|
|
148
|
+
|
|
149
|
+
- Execute task immediately (direct)
|
|
150
|
+
- Provide detailed explanation after (documentation)
|
|
151
|
+
|
|
152
|
+
---
|
|
153
|
+
|
|
154
|
+
## Choosing the Right Style
|
|
155
|
+
|
|
156
|
+
**Consider**:
|
|
157
|
+
|
|
158
|
+
1. **Task complexity** - Simple → Direct, Complex → Chit-chat/Wizard
|
|
159
|
+
2. **User expertise** - Expert → Direct, Beginner → Wizard/Consultative
|
|
160
|
+
3. **Decision impact** - High → Consultative, Low → Direct
|
|
161
|
+
4. **Interaction frequency** - Many steps → Chit-chat, One-shot → Direct
|
|
162
|
+
5. **Cognitive load** - High → Chit-chat (ADHD-optimized), Low → Any
|