kibi-runtime 2.13.2 → 2.13.3
This diff represents the content of publicly available package versions that have been released to one of the supported registries. The information contained in this diff is provided for informational purposes only and reflects changes between package versions as they appear in their respective public registries.
- package/dist/engine-daemon.js +59 -28
- package/dist/index.js +1249 -891
- package/dist/skills/kibi-usage/SKILL.md +12 -3
- package/dist/skills/kibi-usage/resources/proof.md +23 -0
- package/package.json +2 -2
|
@@ -2,7 +2,7 @@
|
|
|
2
2
|
id: kibi-usage
|
|
3
3
|
name: Kibi Usage
|
|
4
4
|
description: Use Kibi's source-first, exact-Git, migration-aware, proof-aware operations safely across MCP or the trusted local CLI, including partial completion repair.
|
|
5
|
-
version: 2.
|
|
5
|
+
version: 2.14.0
|
|
6
6
|
kibiCompatibility: ">=1.0.0"
|
|
7
7
|
tags:
|
|
8
8
|
- kibi
|
|
@@ -237,7 +237,11 @@ authored. Each one is the order the write path accepts.
|
|
|
237
237
|
fact, `requires_predicate` to `relationshipTarget` and `specified_by` to
|
|
238
238
|
its scenario: `specified_by` (req → scenario) is sent in the
|
|
239
239
|
requirement's write, never in the scenario's, so create the scenario
|
|
240
|
-
first
|
|
240
|
+
first, with `assumes` links (scenario → `property_value` fact, sent in
|
|
241
|
+
the scenario's own write) to the values its outcome relies on. Set
|
|
242
|
+
`expects` only on a scenario that has `assumes` links; `expects: success`
|
|
243
|
+
without them only yields `scenario-feasibility-unknown` ("assumes
|
|
244
|
+
nothing"). A
|
|
241
245
|
`modeled` entry and its grounding link must arrive in the same write
|
|
242
246
|
(`modeled semantic_inventory entries (n) must equal logical grounding
|
|
243
247
|
relationships (m)`); a clause not grounded yet stays `status: missing`
|
|
@@ -249,7 +253,12 @@ authored. Each one is the order the write path accepts.
|
|
|
249
253
|
claim_keys must match logical grounding target claim_keys exactly`.
|
|
250
254
|
Prefer supersession for a change of meaning: analyze the new prose,
|
|
251
255
|
write its facts, write the new requirement (`-v2`) with `supersedes` to
|
|
252
|
-
the old one, then set the old one to `status: closed`.
|
|
256
|
+
the old one, then set the old one to `status: closed`. Its scenario
|
|
257
|
+
follows the same rule as in recipe 1: create the new scenario (with
|
|
258
|
+
`assumes` to the `property_value` facts it relies on, and `expects` only
|
|
259
|
+
when it has them) before the `-v2` write that sends `specified_by`, then
|
|
260
|
+
re-point the old scenario (its `assumes` go in its own write) or close
|
|
261
|
+
it. For a wording fix
|
|
253
262
|
that keeps the meaning, re-ground in place: analyze the new prose,
|
|
254
263
|
`kb_upsert` each grounding fact with the new `claim_key`/`claim_text`
|
|
255
264
|
(same fact id), then `kb_upsert` the requirement with the new ledger,
|
|
@@ -97,6 +97,29 @@ Cosmetic edits (descriptions, labels) never stale proof. Execution-relevant
|
|
|
97
97
|
edits (command, artifact, targets, options, bindings, contract) change the
|
|
98
98
|
effective fingerprint and do.
|
|
99
99
|
|
|
100
|
+
## What counts toward proofProven
|
|
101
|
+
|
|
102
|
+
A requirement is proven only by its scenarios' tests, and a scenario test
|
|
103
|
+
counts only when it is an **end-to-end** test with a valid, fresh, passing
|
|
104
|
+
receipt for the current snapshot.
|
|
105
|
+
|
|
106
|
+
- The scope comes from the test entity's `verification_scope`
|
|
107
|
+
(`end_to_end`, `integration`, `unit`), never from the integration id or the
|
|
108
|
+
producer. Without `verification_scope`, a test tagged `e2e` (or whose
|
|
109
|
+
`source` path contains `e2e`) counts as end-to-end; anything else is
|
|
110
|
+
`unknown` scope.
|
|
111
|
+
- A `unit` or `integration` receipt is still recorded on the test entity, but
|
|
112
|
+
it does not move `proofProven` for a behavioural requirement: the
|
|
113
|
+
requirement keeps the `missing_passing_e2e` gap in `proofGaps`. The one
|
|
114
|
+
exception is a scenario whose specifying requirements are all grounded only
|
|
115
|
+
in component-scope UI predicates (`ui_pattern`, `same_pattern`,
|
|
116
|
+
`pattern_marker`); a unit or integration test that renders the component
|
|
117
|
+
may prove it.
|
|
118
|
+
- `coverage_depth` (`kb_coverage`, `kb_find_gaps`) follows the test's
|
|
119
|
+
authored `status` (`passing`) and scope, not its receipts: a passing
|
|
120
|
+
receipt does not change it, and a `passing` status without a fresh receipt
|
|
121
|
+
proves nothing.
|
|
122
|
+
|
|
100
123
|
## Attempt semantics (factual, never optimistic)
|
|
101
124
|
|
|
102
125
|
- `attempts: {status: "complete", entries: [...]}` — known history; the
|
package/package.json
CHANGED
|
@@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
|
|
|
1
1
|
{
|
|
2
2
|
"name": "kibi-runtime",
|
|
3
|
-
"version": "2.13.
|
|
3
|
+
"version": "2.13.3",
|
|
4
4
|
"description": "Narrow first-party runtime contracts and adapters for Kibi operations.",
|
|
5
5
|
"type": "module",
|
|
6
6
|
"main": "./dist/index.js",
|
|
@@ -18,7 +18,7 @@
|
|
|
18
18
|
},
|
|
19
19
|
"dependencies": {
|
|
20
20
|
"gray-matter": "^4.0.3",
|
|
21
|
-
"kibi-core": "^0.
|
|
21
|
+
"kibi-core": "^0.19.0",
|
|
22
22
|
"kibi-plugin-builtin": "^0.5.0",
|
|
23
23
|
"kibi-swipl": "^1.0.1"
|
|
24
24
|
},
|