kibi-core 0.23.0 → 0.26.1

package/src/rule_registry.pl

@@ -69,6 +69,8 @@ known_rule('policy-ownership').
 known_rule('policy-markers').
 known_rule('kb-consistency').
 known_rule('kb-consistency-unresolved').
+known_rule('evidence-floor').
+known_rule('proof-contract-claims').
 
 rule_enforcement_class('must-priority-coverage', canonical).
 rule_enforcement_class('symbol-coverage', canonical).
@@ -125,6 +127,8 @@ rule_enforcement_class('policy-ownership', canonical).
 rule_enforcement_class('policy-markers', canonical).
 rule_enforcement_class('kb-consistency', canonical).
 rule_enforcement_class('kb-consistency-unresolved', advisory).
+rule_enforcement_class('evidence-floor', canonical).
+rule_enforcement_class('proof-contract-claims', canonical).
 
 rule_implementation('must-priority-coverage', prolog).
 rule_implementation('symbol-coverage', prolog).
@@ -181,6 +185,8 @@ rule_implementation('policy-ownership', typescript).
 rule_implementation('policy-markers', typescript).
 rule_implementation('kb-consistency', prolog).
 rule_implementation('kb-consistency-unresolved', prolog).
+rule_implementation('evidence-floor', typescript).
+rule_implementation('proof-contract-claims', typescript).
 
 rule_predicate('must-priority-coverage', check_must_priority_coverage).
 rule_predicate('symbol-coverage', check_symbol_coverage).
@@ -311,3 +317,5 @@ rule_description('policy-ownership', 'When a plugin activated for kibi.check-pol
 rule_description('policy-markers', 'When a plugin activated for kibi.check-policy.v1 declares marker rules, every file implementing a requirement grounded in the rule\'s pattern predicate (with its declared sibling files) must contain each marker the KB declares for that pattern').
 rule_description('kb-consistency', 'The facts current requirements name must hold together, jointly and not only pairwise: every property context needs a value that satisfies all its facts, every atom and decision key one truth value, and stored rules a stratification. Each finding is a contradiction certificate (an irreducible core, two disagreeing facts or a negation cycle) re-verified by the independent checker, or a certificate that checker rejects').
 rule_description('kb-consistency-unresolved', 'Advisory: a property context, atom or decision key whose facts the consistency checker cannot compare (mixed value types or units, an unsupported operator or polarity, or a contradiction whose validity windows never overlap); it never counts as consistent').
+rule_description('evidence-floor', 'Every current requirement\'s computed evidence level (proved, tested, asserted, unverified) must reach its floor: required_evidence when set, otherwise tested for a firm requirement and no floor for any other. Receipts that are only older than the code count as pending re-proof and pass, unless kibi check runs with --fresh-evidence, which also needs a clean proof snapshot').
+rule_description('proof-contract-claims', 'From schema 12, every certificate-kind proof contract (exhaustive, typecheck, arithmetic, smt, rule, state_machine, regex) must name the claims it proves in proves, and each named claim must be a modeled claim of a current requirement the test reaches through its scenarios, grounded by a fact that proof kind can express or attest').

package/src/semantic_quality.pl

@@ -506,7 +506,7 @@ identity_live_fact(FactId) :-
 property_value_signature(Props, Signature) :-
     findall(
         Field-Value,
-        (   member(Field, [value_type, value_string, value_int, value_number, value_bool, unit]),
+        (   member(Field, [value_type, value_string, value_int, value_number, value_bool, value_set, unit]),
             memberchk(Field=Raw, Props),
             signature_value(Raw, Value),
             Value \== ''