kibi-cli 2.3.0 → 2.5.0

package/src/schemas/entity.schema.json

@@ -478,6 +478,51 @@
     "text_ref": {
       "type": "string"
     },
+    "origin": {
+      "type": "object",
+      "required": [
+        "kind"
+      ],
+      "properties": {
+        "kind": {
+          "type": "string",
+          "enum": [
+            "human",
+            "agent",
+            "migration",
+            "import"
+          ],
+          "description": "Who authored the entity: human, agent, migration (backfilled by kibi migrate) or import."
+        },
+        "ref": {
+          "type": "string",
+          "minLength": 1,
+          "pattern": "\\S",
+          "description": "Source reference for the authored content: URL, document path, ticket, commit or conversation id."
+        },
+        "approved_by": {
+          "type": "string",
+          "minLength": 1,
+          "pattern": "\\S",
+          "description": "The person who reviewed and approved this entity's content. Distinct from the requirement-level approved_by of an exception."
+        },
+        "recorded_at": {
+          "type": "string",
+          "pattern": "^\\d{4}-\\d{2}-\\d{2}(?:[T ]\\d{2}:\\d{2}(?::\\d{2}(?:\\.\\d+)?)?(?:Z|[+-]\\d{2}:?\\d{2})?)?$",
+          "description": "ISO-8601 time the provenance was recorded."
+        }
+      },
+      "additionalProperties": false
+    },
+    "expects": {
+      "type": "string",
+      "enum": [
+        "success",
+        "rejection",
+        "error"
+      ],
+      "description": "Scenario-only. The scenario's intended outcome. A scenario that expects success and assumes (via `assumes` facts) a value a current requirement forbids fails the scenario-feasibility check."
+    },
     "proof_exempt": {
       "type": "boolean",
       "description": "Requirement-only. Marks a current requirement as intentionally outside E2E-proof scope; requires proof_exempt_reason."
@@ -487,6 +532,33 @@
       "minLength": 1,
       "description": "Requirement-only. Required when proof_exempt is true; surfaces as the applicability reason in coverage rows."
     },
+    "approved_by": {
+      "type": "string",
+      "minLength": 1,
+      "pattern": "\\S",
+      "description": "Requirement-only. The human who approved this exception requirement. An exception (a requirement that exempts another and is specified_by a scenario) makes that success scenario feasible only when approved_by is set."
+    },
+    "approval_ref": {
+      "type": "string",
+      "minLength": 1,
+      "description": "Requirement-only. Optional reference to the approval decision record (ticket, ADR or review link) for an exception requirement."
+    },
+    "rationale": {
+      "type": "string",
+      "minLength": 1,
+      "pattern": "\\S",
+      "description": "Requirement-only. Why the requirement exists, in one or two sentences from whoever stated the intent. Explanation only: it is not part of the checked meaning."
+    },
+    "exempts_claims": {
+      "type": "array",
+      "minItems": 1,
+      "uniqueItems": true,
+      "items": {
+        "type": "string",
+        "pattern": "^CLAIM-[A-F0-9]{16}$"
+      },
+      "description": "Requirement-only. Narrows an exception requirement to individual clauses: the claim keys (from logic_claims) of the requirement it exempts whose constraints it waives. Without it the exception waives the whole exempted requirement."
+    },
     "semantic_text": {
       "type": "string",
       "description": "Requirement-only authored prose whose exact UTF-8 bytes anchor the semantic inventory without replacing text_ref evidence."
@@ -1155,6 +1227,15 @@
         "type": "string"
       }
     },
+    "key_arguments": {
+      "type": "array",
+      "minItems": 1,
+      "uniqueItems": true,
+      "items": {
+        "type": "string",
+        "minLength": 1
+      }
+    },
     "aliases": {
       "type": "array",
       "items": {
@@ -1380,6 +1461,11 @@
                 "argument_descriptions"
               ]
             },
+            {
+              "required": [
+                "key_arguments"
+              ]
+            },
             {
               "required": [
                 "aliases"
@@ -1546,11 +1632,47 @@
               "required": [
                 "proof_exempt_reason"
               ]
+            },
+            {
+              "required": [
+                "approved_by"
+              ]
+            },
+            {
+              "required": [
+                "approval_ref"
+              ]
+            },
+            {
+              "required": [
+                "rationale"
+              ]
+            },
+            {
+              "required": [
+                "exempts_claims"
+              ]
             }
           ]
         }
       }
     },
+    {
+      "if": {
+        "properties": {
+          "type": {
+            "const": "scenario"
+          }
+        }
+      },
+      "else": {
+        "not": {
+          "required": [
+            "expects"
+          ]
+        }
+      }
+    },
     {
       "if": {
         "anyOf": [

package/src/schemas/relationship.schema.json

@@ -23,6 +23,8 @@
         "consumes",
         "supersedes",
         "restates",
+        "assumes",
+        "exempts",
         "relates_to"
       ]
     },