juno-network 0.3.0 → 0.5.0

package/types/codegen/google/protobuf/duration.d.ts

@@ -0,0 +1,161 @@
+import * as _m0 from "protobufjs/minimal";
+import { Long, DeepPartial } from "@osmonauts/helpers";
+/**
+ * A Duration represents a signed, fixed-length span of time represented
+ * as a count of seconds and fractions of seconds at nanosecond
+ * resolution. It is independent of any calendar and concepts like "day"
+ * or "month". It is related to Timestamp in that the difference between
+ * two Timestamp values is a Duration and it can be added or subtracted
+ * from a Timestamp. Range is approximately +-10,000 years.
+ *
+ * # Examples
+ *
+ * Example 1: Compute Duration from two Timestamps in pseudo code.
+ *
+ * Timestamp start = ...;
+ * Timestamp end = ...;
+ * Duration duration = ...;
+ *
+ * duration.seconds = end.seconds - start.seconds;
+ * duration.nanos = end.nanos - start.nanos;
+ *
+ * if (duration.seconds < 0 && duration.nanos > 0) {
+ * duration.seconds += 1;
+ * duration.nanos -= 1000000000;
+ * } else if (durations.seconds > 0 && duration.nanos < 0) {
+ * duration.seconds -= 1;
+ * duration.nanos += 1000000000;
+ * }
+ *
+ * Example 2: Compute Timestamp from Timestamp + Duration in pseudo code.
+ *
+ * Timestamp start = ...;
+ * Duration duration = ...;
+ * Timestamp end = ...;
+ *
+ * end.seconds = start.seconds + duration.seconds;
+ * end.nanos = start.nanos + duration.nanos;
+ *
+ * if (end.nanos < 0) {
+ * end.seconds -= 1;
+ * end.nanos += 1000000000;
+ * } else if (end.nanos >= 1000000000) {
+ * end.seconds += 1;
+ * end.nanos -= 1000000000;
+ * }
+ *
+ * Example 3: Compute Duration from datetime.timedelta in Python.
+ *
+ * td = datetime.timedelta(days=3, minutes=10)
+ * duration = Duration()
+ * duration.FromTimedelta(td)
+ *
+ * # JSON Mapping
+ *
+ * In JSON format, the Duration type is encoded as a string rather than an
+ * object, where the string ends in the suffix "s" (indicating seconds) and
+ * is preceded by the number of seconds, with nanoseconds expressed as
+ * fractional seconds. For example, 3 seconds with 0 nanoseconds should be
+ * encoded in JSON format as "3s", while 3 seconds and 1 nanosecond should
+ * be expressed in JSON format as "3.000000001s", and 3 seconds and 1
+ * microsecond should be expressed in JSON format as "3.000001s".
+ */
+export interface Duration {
+    /**
+     * Signed seconds of the span of time. Must be from -315,576,000,000
+     * to +315,576,000,000 inclusive. Note: these bounds are computed from:
+     * 60 sec/min * 60 min/hr * 24 hr/day * 365.25 days/year * 10000 years
+     */
+    seconds: Long;
+    /**
+     * Signed fractions of a second at nanosecond resolution of the span
+     * of time. Durations less than one second are represented with a 0
+     * `seconds` field and a positive or negative `nanos` field. For durations
+     * of one second or more, a non-zero value for the `nanos` field must be
+     * of the same sign as the `seconds` field. Must be from -999,999,999
+     * to +999,999,999 inclusive.
+     */
+    nanos: number;
+}
+/**
+ * A Duration represents a signed, fixed-length span of time represented
+ * as a count of seconds and fractions of seconds at nanosecond
+ * resolution. It is independent of any calendar and concepts like "day"
+ * or "month". It is related to Timestamp in that the difference between
+ * two Timestamp values is a Duration and it can be added or subtracted
+ * from a Timestamp. Range is approximately +-10,000 years.
+ *
+ * # Examples
+ *
+ * Example 1: Compute Duration from two Timestamps in pseudo code.
+ *
+ * Timestamp start = ...;
+ * Timestamp end = ...;
+ * Duration duration = ...;
+ *
+ * duration.seconds = end.seconds - start.seconds;
+ * duration.nanos = end.nanos - start.nanos;
+ *
+ * if (duration.seconds < 0 && duration.nanos > 0) {
+ * duration.seconds += 1;
+ * duration.nanos -= 1000000000;
+ * } else if (durations.seconds > 0 && duration.nanos < 0) {
+ * duration.seconds -= 1;
+ * duration.nanos += 1000000000;
+ * }
+ *
+ * Example 2: Compute Timestamp from Timestamp + Duration in pseudo code.
+ *
+ * Timestamp start = ...;
+ * Duration duration = ...;
+ * Timestamp end = ...;
+ *
+ * end.seconds = start.seconds + duration.seconds;
+ * end.nanos = start.nanos + duration.nanos;
+ *
+ * if (end.nanos < 0) {
+ * end.seconds -= 1;
+ * end.nanos += 1000000000;
+ * } else if (end.nanos >= 1000000000) {
+ * end.seconds += 1;
+ * end.nanos -= 1000000000;
+ * }
+ *
+ * Example 3: Compute Duration from datetime.timedelta in Python.
+ *
+ * td = datetime.timedelta(days=3, minutes=10)
+ * duration = Duration()
+ * duration.FromTimedelta(td)
+ *
+ * # JSON Mapping
+ *
+ * In JSON format, the Duration type is encoded as a string rather than an
+ * object, where the string ends in the suffix "s" (indicating seconds) and
+ * is preceded by the number of seconds, with nanoseconds expressed as
+ * fractional seconds. For example, 3 seconds with 0 nanoseconds should be
+ * encoded in JSON format as "3s", while 3 seconds and 1 nanosecond should
+ * be expressed in JSON format as "3.000000001s", and 3 seconds and 1
+ * microsecond should be expressed in JSON format as "3.000001s".
+ */
+export interface DurationSDKType {
+    /**
+     * Signed seconds of the span of time. Must be from -315,576,000,000
+     * to +315,576,000,000 inclusive. Note: these bounds are computed from:
+     * 60 sec/min * 60 min/hr * 24 hr/day * 365.25 days/year * 10000 years
+     */
+    seconds: Long;
+    /**
+     * Signed fractions of a second at nanosecond resolution of the span
+     * of time. Durations less than one second are represented with a 0
+     * `seconds` field and a positive or negative `nanos` field. For durations
+     * of one second or more, a non-zero value for the `nanos` field must be
+     * of the same sign as the `seconds` field. Must be from -999,999,999
+     * to +999,999,999 inclusive.
+     */
+    nanos: number;
+}
+export declare const Duration: {
+    encode(message: Duration, writer?: _m0.Writer): _m0.Writer;
+    decode(input: _m0.Reader | Uint8Array, length?: number): Duration;
+    fromPartial(object: DeepPartial<Duration>): Duration;
+};

package/types/codegen/google/protobuf/empty.d.ts

@@ -0,0 +1,33 @@
+import * as _m0 from "protobufjs/minimal";
+import { DeepPartial } from "@osmonauts/helpers";
+/**
+ * A generic empty message that you can re-use to avoid defining duplicated
+ * empty messages in your APIs. A typical example is to use it as the request
+ * or the response type of an API method. For instance:
+ *
+ * service Foo {
+ * rpc Bar(google.protobuf.Empty) returns (google.protobuf.Empty);
+ * }
+ *
+ * The JSON representation for `Empty` is empty JSON object `{}`.
+ */
+export interface Empty {
+}
+/**
+ * A generic empty message that you can re-use to avoid defining duplicated
+ * empty messages in your APIs. A typical example is to use it as the request
+ * or the response type of an API method. For instance:
+ *
+ * service Foo {
+ * rpc Bar(google.protobuf.Empty) returns (google.protobuf.Empty);
+ * }
+ *
+ * The JSON representation for `Empty` is empty JSON object `{}`.
+ */
+export interface EmptySDKType {
+}
+export declare const Empty: {
+    encode(_: Empty, writer?: _m0.Writer): _m0.Writer;
+    decode(input: _m0.Reader | Uint8Array, length?: number): Empty;
+    fromPartial(_: DeepPartial<Empty>): Empty;
+};

package/types/codegen/google/protobuf/field_mask.d.ts

@@ -0,0 +1,417 @@
+import * as _m0 from "protobufjs/minimal";
+import { DeepPartial } from "@osmonauts/helpers";
+/**
+ * `FieldMask` represents a set of symbolic field paths, for example:
+ *
+ * paths: "f.a"
+ * paths: "f.b.d"
+ *
+ * Here `f` represents a field in some root message, `a` and `b`
+ * fields in the message found in `f`, and `d` a field found in the
+ * message in `f.b`.
+ *
+ * Field masks are used to specify a subset of fields that should be
+ * returned by a get operation or modified by an update operation.
+ * Field masks also have a custom JSON encoding (see below).
+ *
+ * # Field Masks in Projections
+ *
+ * When used in the context of a projection, a response message or
+ * sub-message is filtered by the API to only contain those fields as
+ * specified in the mask. For example, if the mask in the previous
+ * example is applied to a response message as follows:
+ *
+ * f {
+ * a : 22
+ * b {
+ * d : 1
+ * x : 2
+ * }
+ * y : 13
+ * }
+ * z: 8
+ *
+ * The result will not contain specific values for fields x,y and z
+ * (their value will be set to the default, and omitted in proto text
+ * output):
+ *
+ *
+ * f {
+ * a : 22
+ * b {
+ * d : 1
+ * }
+ * }
+ *
+ * A repeated field is not allowed except at the last position of a
+ * paths string.
+ *
+ * If a FieldMask object is not present in a get operation, the
+ * operation applies to all fields (as if a FieldMask of all fields
+ * had been specified).
+ *
+ * Note that a field mask does not necessarily apply to the
+ * top-level response message. In case of a REST get operation, the
+ * field mask applies directly to the response, but in case of a REST
+ * list operation, the mask instead applies to each individual message
+ * in the returned resource list. In case of a REST custom method,
+ * other definitions may be used. Where the mask applies will be
+ * clearly documented together with its declaration in the API.  In
+ * any case, the effect on the returned resource/resources is required
+ * behavior for APIs.
+ *
+ * # Field Masks in Update Operations
+ *
+ * A field mask in update operations specifies which fields of the
+ * targeted resource are going to be updated. The API is required
+ * to only change the values of the fields as specified in the mask
+ * and leave the others untouched. If a resource is passed in to
+ * describe the updated values, the API ignores the values of all
+ * fields not covered by the mask.
+ *
+ * If a repeated field is specified for an update operation, new values will
+ * be appended to the existing repeated field in the target resource. Note that
+ * a repeated field is only allowed in the last position of a `paths` string.
+ *
+ * If a sub-message is specified in the last position of the field mask for an
+ * update operation, then new value will be merged into the existing sub-message
+ * in the target resource.
+ *
+ * For example, given the target message:
+ *
+ * f {
+ * b {
+ * d: 1
+ * x: 2
+ * }
+ * c: [1]
+ * }
+ *
+ * And an update message:
+ *
+ * f {
+ * b {
+ * d: 10
+ * }
+ * c: [2]
+ * }
+ *
+ * then if the field mask is:
+ *
+ * paths: ["f.b", "f.c"]
+ *
+ * then the result will be:
+ *
+ * f {
+ * b {
+ * d: 10
+ * x: 2
+ * }
+ * c: [1, 2]
+ * }
+ *
+ * An implementation may provide options to override this default behavior for
+ * repeated and message fields.
+ *
+ * In order to reset a field's value to the default, the field must
+ * be in the mask and set to the default value in the provided resource.
+ * Hence, in order to reset all fields of a resource, provide a default
+ * instance of the resource and set all fields in the mask, or do
+ * not provide a mask as described below.
+ *
+ * If a field mask is not present on update, the operation applies to
+ * all fields (as if a field mask of all fields has been specified).
+ * Note that in the presence of schema evolution, this may mean that
+ * fields the client does not know and has therefore not filled into
+ * the request will be reset to their default. If this is unwanted
+ * behavior, a specific service may require a client to always specify
+ * a field mask, producing an error if not.
+ *
+ * As with get operations, the location of the resource which
+ * describes the updated values in the request message depends on the
+ * operation kind. In any case, the effect of the field mask is
+ * required to be honored by the API.
+ *
+ * ## Considerations for HTTP REST
+ *
+ * The HTTP kind of an update operation which uses a field mask must
+ * be set to PATCH instead of PUT in order to satisfy HTTP semantics
+ * (PUT must only be used for full updates).
+ *
+ * # JSON Encoding of Field Masks
+ *
+ * In JSON, a field mask is encoded as a single string where paths are
+ * separated by a comma. Fields name in each path are converted
+ * to/from lower-camel naming conventions.
+ *
+ * As an example, consider the following message declarations:
+ *
+ * message Profile {
+ * User user = 1;
+ * Photo photo = 2;
+ * }
+ * message User {
+ * string display_name = 1;
+ * string address = 2;
+ * }
+ *
+ * In proto a field mask for `Profile` may look as such:
+ *
+ * mask {
+ * paths: "user.display_name"
+ * paths: "photo"
+ * }
+ *
+ * In JSON, the same mask is represented as below:
+ *
+ * {
+ * mask: "user.displayName,photo"
+ * }
+ *
+ * # Field Masks and Oneof Fields
+ *
+ * Field masks treat fields in oneofs just as regular fields. Consider the
+ * following message:
+ *
+ * message SampleMessage {
+ * oneof test_oneof {
+ * string name = 4;
+ * SubMessage sub_message = 9;
+ * }
+ * }
+ *
+ * The field mask can be:
+ *
+ * mask {
+ * paths: "name"
+ * }
+ *
+ * Or:
+ *
+ * mask {
+ * paths: "sub_message"
+ * }
+ *
+ * Note that oneof type names ("test_oneof" in this case) cannot be used in
+ * paths.
+ *
+ * ## Field Mask Verification
+ *
+ * The implementation of any API method which has a FieldMask type field in the
+ * request should verify the included field paths, and return an
+ * `INVALID_ARGUMENT` error if any path is duplicated or unmappable.
+ */
+export interface FieldMask {
+    /** The set of field mask paths. */
+    paths: string[];
+}
+/**
+ * `FieldMask` represents a set of symbolic field paths, for example:
+ *
+ * paths: "f.a"
+ * paths: "f.b.d"
+ *
+ * Here `f` represents a field in some root message, `a` and `b`
+ * fields in the message found in `f`, and `d` a field found in the
+ * message in `f.b`.
+ *
+ * Field masks are used to specify a subset of fields that should be
+ * returned by a get operation or modified by an update operation.
+ * Field masks also have a custom JSON encoding (see below).
+ *
+ * # Field Masks in Projections
+ *
+ * When used in the context of a projection, a response message or
+ * sub-message is filtered by the API to only contain those fields as
+ * specified in the mask. For example, if the mask in the previous
+ * example is applied to a response message as follows:
+ *
+ * f {
+ * a : 22
+ * b {
+ * d : 1
+ * x : 2
+ * }
+ * y : 13
+ * }
+ * z: 8
+ *
+ * The result will not contain specific values for fields x,y and z
+ * (their value will be set to the default, and omitted in proto text
+ * output):
+ *
+ *
+ * f {
+ * a : 22
+ * b {
+ * d : 1
+ * }
+ * }
+ *
+ * A repeated field is not allowed except at the last position of a
+ * paths string.
+ *
+ * If a FieldMask object is not present in a get operation, the
+ * operation applies to all fields (as if a FieldMask of all fields
+ * had been specified).
+ *
+ * Note that a field mask does not necessarily apply to the
+ * top-level response message. In case of a REST get operation, the
+ * field mask applies directly to the response, but in case of a REST
+ * list operation, the mask instead applies to each individual message
+ * in the returned resource list. In case of a REST custom method,
+ * other definitions may be used. Where the mask applies will be
+ * clearly documented together with its declaration in the API.  In
+ * any case, the effect on the returned resource/resources is required
+ * behavior for APIs.
+ *
+ * # Field Masks in Update Operations
+ *
+ * A field mask in update operations specifies which fields of the
+ * targeted resource are going to be updated. The API is required
+ * to only change the values of the fields as specified in the mask
+ * and leave the others untouched. If a resource is passed in to
+ * describe the updated values, the API ignores the values of all
+ * fields not covered by the mask.
+ *
+ * If a repeated field is specified for an update operation, new values will
+ * be appended to the existing repeated field in the target resource. Note that
+ * a repeated field is only allowed in the last position of a `paths` string.
+ *
+ * If a sub-message is specified in the last position of the field mask for an
+ * update operation, then new value will be merged into the existing sub-message
+ * in the target resource.
+ *
+ * For example, given the target message:
+ *
+ * f {
+ * b {
+ * d: 1
+ * x: 2
+ * }
+ * c: [1]
+ * }
+ *
+ * And an update message:
+ *
+ * f {
+ * b {
+ * d: 10
+ * }
+ * c: [2]
+ * }
+ *
+ * then if the field mask is:
+ *
+ * paths: ["f.b", "f.c"]
+ *
+ * then the result will be:
+ *
+ * f {
+ * b {
+ * d: 10
+ * x: 2
+ * }
+ * c: [1, 2]
+ * }
+ *
+ * An implementation may provide options to override this default behavior for
+ * repeated and message fields.
+ *
+ * In order to reset a field's value to the default, the field must
+ * be in the mask and set to the default value in the provided resource.
+ * Hence, in order to reset all fields of a resource, provide a default
+ * instance of the resource and set all fields in the mask, or do
+ * not provide a mask as described below.
+ *
+ * If a field mask is not present on update, the operation applies to
+ * all fields (as if a field mask of all fields has been specified).
+ * Note that in the presence of schema evolution, this may mean that
+ * fields the client does not know and has therefore not filled into
+ * the request will be reset to their default. If this is unwanted
+ * behavior, a specific service may require a client to always specify
+ * a field mask, producing an error if not.
+ *
+ * As with get operations, the location of the resource which
+ * describes the updated values in the request message depends on the
+ * operation kind. In any case, the effect of the field mask is
+ * required to be honored by the API.
+ *
+ * ## Considerations for HTTP REST
+ *
+ * The HTTP kind of an update operation which uses a field mask must
+ * be set to PATCH instead of PUT in order to satisfy HTTP semantics
+ * (PUT must only be used for full updates).
+ *
+ * # JSON Encoding of Field Masks
+ *
+ * In JSON, a field mask is encoded as a single string where paths are
+ * separated by a comma. Fields name in each path are converted
+ * to/from lower-camel naming conventions.
+ *
+ * As an example, consider the following message declarations:
+ *
+ * message Profile {
+ * User user = 1;
+ * Photo photo = 2;
+ * }
+ * message User {
+ * string display_name = 1;
+ * string address = 2;
+ * }
+ *
+ * In proto a field mask for `Profile` may look as such:
+ *
+ * mask {
+ * paths: "user.display_name"
+ * paths: "photo"
+ * }
+ *
+ * In JSON, the same mask is represented as below:
+ *
+ * {
+ * mask: "user.displayName,photo"
+ * }
+ *
+ * # Field Masks and Oneof Fields
+ *
+ * Field masks treat fields in oneofs just as regular fields. Consider the
+ * following message:
+ *
+ * message SampleMessage {
+ * oneof test_oneof {
+ * string name = 4;
+ * SubMessage sub_message = 9;
+ * }
+ * }
+ *
+ * The field mask can be:
+ *
+ * mask {
+ * paths: "name"
+ * }
+ *
+ * Or:
+ *
+ * mask {
+ * paths: "sub_message"
+ * }
+ *
+ * Note that oneof type names ("test_oneof" in this case) cannot be used in
+ * paths.
+ *
+ * ## Field Mask Verification
+ *
+ * The implementation of any API method which has a FieldMask type field in the
+ * request should verify the included field paths, and return an
+ * `INVALID_ARGUMENT` error if any path is duplicated or unmappable.
+ */
+export interface FieldMaskSDKType {
+    /** The set of field mask paths. */
+    paths: string[];
+}
+export declare const FieldMask: {
+    encode(message: FieldMask, writer?: _m0.Writer): _m0.Writer;
+    decode(input: _m0.Reader | Uint8Array, length?: number): FieldMask;
+    fromPartial(object: DeepPartial<FieldMask>): FieldMask;
+};