jsgui3-server 0.0.121 → 0.0.122

package/examples/controls/9) window, date picker/client.js

@@ -1,303 +1,303 @@
-const jsgui = require('jsgui3-client');
-const {controls, Control, mixins} = jsgui;
-const {dragable} = mixins;
-
-
-const {Checkbox, Date_Picker} = controls;
-
-const Active_HTML_Document = require('../../../controls/Active_HTML_Document');
-
-// Will make Date_Picker use progressive enhancement.
-//   On activation would create a new element? Create a new sibling?
-//     May want code that checks for .el being changed.
-
-
-// Would be worth improving Date_Picker so it has both its view model and data model.
-//  kind of view state and data state.
-
-// Then could have 2 shared model mirrored date pickers.
-
-// still could use just .value and respond to changes in that.
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-// Maybe any control which has one or more values will benefit from having these 2 or more model levels added to them.
-
-
-// Would be nice to have it more automatic.
-//   Would be worth putting on a lower level to make really easy to integrate into controls.
-
-// data.model.schema may help a lot as well.
-// data.model.data ???
-
-// so a data model (or other model) contains its own data property.
-
-// data.model.data even
-// data.schema?
-// data.model.schema would then be more unambiguously available.
-
-// For the moment, don't want to make all the options of dynamically changing them, can add them as we go.
-
-// Lower level work, outside of jsgui3 itself? could help formalise the data models and schemas.
-
-// Maybe jsgui should have a Data_Model_View_Model pattern or object?
-// Multi_Model or Multi_Model_Pattern.
-
-// For the moment, let's get one or two things done cleanly and more explicitly.
-
-// Perhaps it would work best as a Mixin for now.
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-// May be worth formalising it further
-
-
-
-
-// It's .value would refer to its .data.model.value
-
-
-
-// Nice to have the date picker (be able to) use .data.model and .view.model.
-
-
-
-
-class Demo_UI extends Active_HTML_Document {
-    constructor(spec = {}) {
-        spec.__type_name = spec.__type_name || 'demo_ui';
-        super(spec);
-        const {context} = this;
-
-        // Make sure it requires the correct CSS.
-        //  Though making that 'effortless' on the server may help more.
-
-
-        // Maybe can't do this here???
-
-        // Does not have .body (yet) on the client.
-        //   simple way to get the client to attach the body of the Active_HTML_Document?
-        //     maybe with jsgui-data-controls?
-        //   Though automatically having the .body property available on the client without sending extra HTTP
-        //     plumbing will help.
-
-        // .body will not be available before activation.
-
-
-        // .body should not be a normal function....?
-        //   a getter function would be better.
-
-
-        if (typeof this.body.add_class === 'function') {
-            this.body.add_class('demo-ui');
-        }
-
-        //console.log('this.body', this.body);
-        //console.log('this.body.add_class', this.body.add_class);
-
-
-        const compose = () => {
-            // put 20 of them in place.
-
-            // Then how to arrange them...?
-
-
-
-
-            const window = new controls.Window({
-                context: context,
-                title: 'jsgui3-html Checkbox Control',
-                pos: [10, 10]
-            });
-
-            // Have Tab_Page items inside???
-
-            // Setting a 'selectable' property at the composition stage could be very helpful in some cases,
-            //   May want composition-level mixins?
-            //   Maybe those mixins would also have code that runs on activation.
-            //     'compositional mixins' ???
-
-            // Need mixins to be very flexible to avoid the probles React had with them.
-            //   Choose what functionality the mixin provides in some cases.
-            //     Need to keep tight control over the coupling of mixins.
-            //   Each mixin may need to be somewhat complex to avoid hiccups - and to consistently act in the set modes.
-            //     If a mixin is to do something different to before that functionality should be called differently.
-
-            // mixin.enabled_feature_sets = [feature_set_1_name, feature_set_2_name] ....
-
-
-
-            // Will work on more options & perfection for month_view.
-
-            /*
-
-            new Checkbox({
-                context,
-                label: {
-                    text: 'A checkbox'
-                }
-            })
-
-            */
-            
-            // Sensible properties like this will help.
-            
-            // A progressively enhancing control could help a lot.
-            //   Something that when it's in the doc will even replace its own element.
-            //   Lower level code to enable really simple to express progressive enhancement could help, maybe would not be needed.
-
-
-
-
-
-            const date_picker = new Date_Picker({
-                context,
-                //label: {
-                //    text: 'A checkbox'
-                //}
-            })
-
-            window.inner.add(date_picker);
-
-            this.body.add(window);
-
-
-
-            
-
-
-        }
-        if (!spec.el) {
-            compose();
-        }
-    }
-    activate() {
-        if (!this.__active) {
-            super.activate();
-            const {context} = this;
-
-            //console.log('activate Demo_UI');
-            // listen for the context events regarding frames, changes, resizing.
-
-            context.on('window-resize', e_resize => {
-                
-                // Could see about having some window contents bound through CSS to the size of the window.
-                //   Though having a framework of adjusting CSS from the JS on-the-fly could work too.
-
-                // May be done with the 'bind' mixin, or will make more specific mixins to do things like bind
-                //   a control to the space within another control, space within a specific part of that control.
-
-                // Or bind to parent size. That should be possible with CSS though.
-                //   May make some controls make more use of CSS by default
-                //   Or having an absolutely positioned box model used extensively could avoid some ambiguity, though
-                //     making use of and supporting generally respected CSS features will help too.
-
-                //console.log('window-resize', e_resize);
-
-                // Make all internal controls go absolute in terms of position
-                //   Remove them from their containers too?
-                //   Ie their containing divs?
-
-                // Would be nice to do this really simple with a fn call or very simple piece of code.
-                // Like get absolute position, set position to be absolute, move to that position.
-                // Maybe something within jsgui3-client helps with this, this is more about what needs to be done on the client.
-                //   Though recognising perf implications, it's (more) OK to include client-side functionality in jsgui3-html.
-
-
-
-
-
-
-            });
-
-        }
-    }
-}
-
-// Include this in bundling.
-//  Want CSS bundling so that styles are read out from the JS document and compiled to a stylesheet.
-
-//controls.Demo_UI = Demo_UI;
-
-// A css file may be an easier way to get started...?
-//  Want to support but not require css in js.
-
-// But need to set up the serving of the CSS both on the server, and on the client.
-//  Ofc setting it up on the server first is important - then can that stage set it up in the doc sent to the client?
-
-// Including the CSS from the JS like before.
-//  Needs to extract the CSS and serve it as a separate CSS file.
-//  Should also have end-to-end regression tests so this does not break again in the future.
-//   The code was kind of clunky and got refactored away.
-//   
-
-// Would need to parse the JS files to extract the CSS.
-//  Maybe could do it an easier way??? Now that it's easy, want a faster way.
-
-
-Demo_UI.css = `
-
-* {
-    margin: 0;
-    padding: 0;
-}
-
-body {
-    overflow-x: hidden;
-    overflow-y: hidden;
-    background-color: #E0E0E0;
-}
-
-.demo-ui {
-    
-    /* 
-
-    display: flex;
-    flex-wrap: wrap;
-    
-    flex-direction: column; 
-    justify-content: center;
-    align-items: center;
-    text-align: center;
-    min-height: 100vh;
-    */
-    
-}
-`;
-
-// But may want to remove them from that flex upon picking up / dropping them.
-//  Maybe best upon drop.
-
-// Maybe want other examples that use absolute positioning to position the items at the start?
-// 
-
-
-
-//controls.Square_Box = Square_Box;
-// could export jsgui with the updated controls....
-//  so that they are in the correct Page Context.?
-
-
-controls.Demo_UI = Demo_UI;
-
-module.exports = jsgui;
-
-/*
-module.exports = {
-    Square_Box: Square_Box,
-    Demo_UI: Demo_UI
-}
-*/
-
-// Then if window...?
-
-// Need to add the Square_Box control to the context or original map of controls...
-
+const jsgui = require('jsgui3-client');
+const {controls, Control, mixins} = jsgui;
+const {dragable} = mixins;
+
+
+const {Checkbox, Date_Picker} = controls;
+
+const Active_HTML_Document = require('../../../controls/Active_HTML_Document');
+
+// Will make Date_Picker use progressive enhancement.
+//   On activation would create a new element? Create a new sibling?
+//     May want code that checks for .el being changed.
+
+
+// Would be worth improving Date_Picker so it has both its view model and data model.
+//  kind of view state and data state.
+
+// Then could have 2 shared model mirrored date pickers.
+
+// still could use just .value and respond to changes in that.
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+// Maybe any control which has one or more values will benefit from having these 2 or more model levels added to them.
+
+
+// Would be nice to have it more automatic.
+//   Would be worth putting on a lower level to make really easy to integrate into controls.
+
+// data.model.schema may help a lot as well.
+// data.model.data ???
+
+// so a data model (or other model) contains its own data property.
+
+// data.model.data even
+// data.schema?
+// data.model.schema would then be more unambiguously available.
+
+// For the moment, don't want to make all the options of dynamically changing them, can add them as we go.
+
+// Lower level work, outside of jsgui3 itself? could help formalise the data models and schemas.
+
+// Maybe jsgui should have a Data_Model_View_Model pattern or object?
+// Multi_Model or Multi_Model_Pattern.
+
+// For the moment, let's get one or two things done cleanly and more explicitly.
+
+// Perhaps it would work best as a Mixin for now.
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+// May be worth formalising it further
+
+
+
+
+// It's .value would refer to its .data.model.value
+
+
+
+// Nice to have the date picker (be able to) use .data.model and .view.model.
+
+
+
+
+class Demo_UI extends Active_HTML_Document {
+    constructor(spec = {}) {
+        spec.__type_name = spec.__type_name || 'demo_ui';
+        super(spec);
+        const {context} = this;
+
+        // Make sure it requires the correct CSS.
+        //  Though making that 'effortless' on the server may help more.
+
+
+        // Maybe can't do this here???
+
+        // Does not have .body (yet) on the client.
+        //   simple way to get the client to attach the body of the Active_HTML_Document?
+        //     maybe with jsgui-data-controls?
+        //   Though automatically having the .body property available on the client without sending extra HTTP
+        //     plumbing will help.
+
+        // .body will not be available before activation.
+
+
+        // .body should not be a normal function....?
+        //   a getter function would be better.
+
+
+        if (typeof this.body.add_class === 'function') {
+            this.body.add_class('demo-ui');
+        }
+
+        //console.log('this.body', this.body);
+        //console.log('this.body.add_class', this.body.add_class);
+
+
+        const compose = () => {
+            // put 20 of them in place.
+
+            // Then how to arrange them...?
+
+
+
+
+            const window = new controls.Window({
+                context: context,
+                title: 'jsgui3-html Checkbox Control',
+                pos: [10, 10]
+            });
+
+            // Have Tab_Page items inside???
+
+            // Setting a 'selectable' property at the composition stage could be very helpful in some cases,
+            //   May want composition-level mixins?
+            //   Maybe those mixins would also have code that runs on activation.
+            //     'compositional mixins' ???
+
+            // Need mixins to be very flexible to avoid the probles React had with them.
+            //   Choose what functionality the mixin provides in some cases.
+            //     Need to keep tight control over the coupling of mixins.
+            //   Each mixin may need to be somewhat complex to avoid hiccups - and to consistently act in the set modes.
+            //     If a mixin is to do something different to before that functionality should be called differently.
+
+            // mixin.enabled_feature_sets = [feature_set_1_name, feature_set_2_name] ....
+
+
+
+            // Will work on more options & perfection for month_view.
+
+            /*
+
+            new Checkbox({
+                context,
+                label: {
+                    text: 'A checkbox'
+                }
+            })
+
+            */
+            
+            // Sensible properties like this will help.
+            
+            // A progressively enhancing control could help a lot.
+            //   Something that when it's in the doc will even replace its own element.
+            //   Lower level code to enable really simple to express progressive enhancement could help, maybe would not be needed.
+
+
+
+
+
+            const date_picker = new Date_Picker({
+                context,
+                //label: {
+                //    text: 'A checkbox'
+                //}
+            })
+
+            window.inner.add(date_picker);
+
+            this.body.add(window);
+
+
+
+            
+
+
+        }
+        if (!spec.el) {
+            compose();
+        }
+    }
+    activate() {
+        if (!this.__active) {
+            super.activate();
+            const {context} = this;
+
+            //console.log('activate Demo_UI');
+            // listen for the context events regarding frames, changes, resizing.
+
+            context.on('window-resize', e_resize => {
+                
+                // Could see about having some window contents bound through CSS to the size of the window.
+                //   Though having a framework of adjusting CSS from the JS on-the-fly could work too.
+
+                // May be done with the 'bind' mixin, or will make more specific mixins to do things like bind
+                //   a control to the space within another control, space within a specific part of that control.
+
+                // Or bind to parent size. That should be possible with CSS though.
+                //   May make some controls make more use of CSS by default
+                //   Or having an absolutely positioned box model used extensively could avoid some ambiguity, though
+                //     making use of and supporting generally respected CSS features will help too.
+
+                //console.log('window-resize', e_resize);
+
+                // Make all internal controls go absolute in terms of position
+                //   Remove them from their containers too?
+                //   Ie their containing divs?
+
+                // Would be nice to do this really simple with a fn call or very simple piece of code.
+                // Like get absolute position, set position to be absolute, move to that position.
+                // Maybe something within jsgui3-client helps with this, this is more about what needs to be done on the client.
+                //   Though recognising perf implications, it's (more) OK to include client-side functionality in jsgui3-html.
+
+
+
+
+
+
+            });
+
+        }
+    }
+}
+
+// Include this in bundling.
+//  Want CSS bundling so that styles are read out from the JS document and compiled to a stylesheet.
+
+//controls.Demo_UI = Demo_UI;
+
+// A css file may be an easier way to get started...?
+//  Want to support but not require css in js.
+
+// But need to set up the serving of the CSS both on the server, and on the client.
+//  Ofc setting it up on the server first is important - then can that stage set it up in the doc sent to the client?
+
+// Including the CSS from the JS like before.
+//  Needs to extract the CSS and serve it as a separate CSS file.
+//  Should also have end-to-end regression tests so this does not break again in the future.
+//   The code was kind of clunky and got refactored away.
+//   
+
+// Would need to parse the JS files to extract the CSS.
+//  Maybe could do it an easier way??? Now that it's easy, want a faster way.
+
+
+Demo_UI.css = `
+
+* {
+    margin: 0;
+    padding: 0;
+}
+
+body {
+    overflow-x: hidden;
+    overflow-y: hidden;
+    background-color: #E0E0E0;
+}
+
+.demo-ui {
+    
+    /* 
+
+    display: flex;
+    flex-wrap: wrap;
+    
+    flex-direction: column; 
+    justify-content: center;
+    align-items: center;
+    text-align: center;
+    min-height: 100vh;
+    */
+    
+}
+`;
+
+// But may want to remove them from that flex upon picking up / dropping them.
+//  Maybe best upon drop.
+
+// Maybe want other examples that use absolute positioning to position the items at the start?
+// 
+
+
+
+//controls.Square_Box = Square_Box;
+// could export jsgui with the updated controls....
+//  so that they are in the correct Page Context.?
+
+
+controls.Demo_UI = Demo_UI;
+
+module.exports = jsgui;
+
+/*
+module.exports = {
+    Square_Box: Square_Box,
+    Demo_UI: Demo_UI
+}
+*/
+
+// Then if window...?
+
+// Need to add the Square_Box control to the context or original map of controls...
+