jsfe 1.10.7 → 1.10.8

package/dist/helpers/answer.d.ts.map

@@ -1 +1 @@
-{"version":3,"file":"answer.d.ts","sourceRoot":"","sources":["../../src/helpers/answer.js"],"names":[],"mappings":"AA4MA;;;GAGG;AACH,wEAkBC;AAED,+HAA+H;AAC/H,oDAIC;AAcD,2GAA2G;AAC3G,uDAGC;AAOD;;;;;GAKG;AACH,+DAUC;AAKD;;;;GAIG;AACH,oDAEC;AAiBD;;;;;;GAMG;AACH,mDAAmF;AAEnF,kGAAkG;AAClG;;;EAmCC;AAUD;;;;;;;;;GASG;AACH,6EA4GC;;;;;;;;AA/aD,qCAKiD"}
+{"version":3,"file":"answer.d.ts","sourceRoot":"","sources":["../../src/helpers/answer.js"],"names":[],"mappings":"AA6MA;;;GAGG;AACH,wEAkBC;AAED,+HAA+H;AAC/H,oDAIC;AAcD,2GAA2G;AAC3G,uDAGC;AAOD;;;;;GAKG;AACH,+DAUC;AAKD;;;;GAIG;AACH,oDAEC;AAiBD;;;;;;GAMG;AACH,mDAAmF;AAEnF,kGAAkG;AAClG;;;EAmCC;AAUD;;;;;;;;;GASG;AACH,6EA4GC;;;;;;;;AA/aD,qCAKwE"}

package/dist/helpers/answer.js

@@ -39,14 +39,15 @@ export const ANSWER_WORDS = {
 // The ONLY words that confirm a choice that charges or cancels (`exact`), besides the choice's own words and keys; courtesy
 // around them is allowed (owner decision 2026-10-15: "clear charge confirmation exclusively"). Left out on purpose:
 // acknowledgements ("ok", "está bien", "fine", "sounds good", "perfecto": "I heard you", not "charge me"), "bueno" (the
-// Mexican phone "hello?"), courtesy alone ("please", "por favor"), words that are questions once ASR drops the "?"
-// ("right", "seguro", "exactly", "así es"), and agreeing to continue ("continue", "continuar").
+// Mexican phone "hello?"), words that are questions once ASR drops the "?" ("right", "seguro", "exactly", "así es"), and
+// agreeing to continue ("continue", "continuar"). "please" / "por favor" alone confirm (owner rule 2026-10-26: prod
+// 21:47, "por favor" to "presione 1 o diga SÍ" at a payment offer was not taken and the payment was lost).
 export const CONFIRM_WORDS = ['yes', 'yeah', 'yep', 'yup', 'sure', 'of course', 'absolutely', 'definitely', 'confirm', 'i confirm',
     'confirmed', 'approve', 'i approve', 'approved', 'agree', 'i agree', 'agreed', 'proceed', 'go ahead', 'go ahead please', 'do it',
     'correct', "that's correct", 'that is correct', "that's right", 'that is right', 'yes i do',
     'si', 'sí', 'claro', 'claro que sí', 'claro que si', 'por supuesto', 'confirmo', 'confirmado', 'apruebo', 'aprobado', 'adelante',
     'dale', 'hazlo', 'procede', 'proceda', 'proceder', 'procedo', 'sí proceda', 'si proceda', 'correcto', 'de acuerdo',
-    'estoy de acuerdo', 'sí quiero', 'si quiero'];
+    'estoy de acuerdo', 'sí quiero', 'si quiero', 'please', 'por favor'];
 // Acknowledgements: never a confirmation of an `exact` choice on their own, but said beside one ("Sí, está bien", "Yes,
 // okay") they change nothing, like courtesy. Beside an exact choice's own words, a CONFIRM word is the same ("Yes, the
 // full balance").

package/dist/runtime-identity.js

@@ -1 +1 @@
-export const JSFE_RUNTIME_FINGERPRINT = "sha256:7d7eed4421d54620c8003db7ad362a4ecfb2689e8fcaf050e43fd93912f6e914";
+export const JSFE_RUNTIME_FINGERPRINT = "sha256:2ee0e74e5da06d62d22520608be1621f099396640d5a2bc08b2f8855af499f8e";

package/docs/development-release.md

@@ -1,3 +1,9 @@
+## 1.10.8: "por favor" confirms
+
+"please" / "por favor" alone are a firm YES (`CONFIRM_WORDS`; owner rule 2026-10-26: prod 21:47, "por favor" to "presione 1 o
+diga SÍ" at a payment offer was not taken and the payment was lost). "No, por favor", "espere por favor" and "un enlace
+por favor" are still not a YES.
+
 ## 1.10.7: a firm question's key in minimal context
 
 At a firm question (a yes choice that charges or cancels), its key confirms only alone or beside please/thanks or a CONFIRM

package/package.json

@@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
 {
   "name": "jsfe",
-  "version": "1.10.7",
+  "version": "1.10.8",
   "description": "TypeScript workflow engine for conversational/automation apps: multi-flow orchestration, interrupt/resume, stack-based control, robust errors, and flexible tool/REST integration.",
   "license": "MIT",
   "author": "Ron Pinkas",