intelligent-system-design-language 0.3.13 → 0.3.14

package/out/_isdlStyles.scss

@@ -345,9 +345,10 @@
 
   .v-row {
     column-gap: 1rem;
-    height: 100%;
+    height: auto;
 
     > .v-col {
+      height: auto;
       padding-left: 0;
       padding-right: 0;
     }
@@ -671,7 +672,7 @@
   }
 
   .isdl-tracker {
-    height: 100%;
+    height: auto;
 
     .tracker-content {
       width: 100%;

package/out/cli/components/_isdlStyles.scss

@@ -345,9 +345,10 @@
 
   .v-row {
     column-gap: 1rem;
-    height: 100%;
+    height: auto;
 
     > .v-col {
+      height: auto;
       padding-left: 0;
       padding-right: 0;
     }
@@ -671,7 +672,7 @@
   }
 
   .isdl-tracker {
-    height: 100%;
+    height: auto;
 
     .tracker-content {
       width: 100%;

package/out/extension/main.cjs

@@ -65641,7 +65641,11 @@ function registerValidationChecks(services) {
     NumberExp: validator.validateNumberExp,
     ResourceExp: validator.validateResourceExp,
     AttributeExp: validator.validateAttributeExp,
-    DamageTrackExp: validator.validateWipField
+    DamageTrackExp: validator.validateWipField,
+    ParentAccess: validator.validateParentAccess,
+    ParentAssignment: validator.validateParentAccess,
+    TargetAccess: validator.validateTargetAccess,
+    TargetAssignment: validator.validateTargetAccess
   };
   registry.register(checks, validator);
 }
@@ -65882,6 +65886,51 @@ var IntelligentSystemDesignLanguageValidator = class {
       this.validateNumericExpression(modParam.method.body, accept);
     }
   }
+  /**
+   * `parent.X` only resolves inside an `if (parent is SomeActor)` check, because an
+   * Item can be owned by any Actor type. Without the guard the property reference
+   * fails to resolve, producing a cryptic "Could not resolve reference to Property"
+   * error. Detect the missing guard and surface a clear, actionable message instead.
+   */
+  validateParentAccess(node, accept) {
+    var _a, _b;
+    const guard = ast_utils_exports.getContainerOfType(node, (n) => isIfStatement(n) && isParentTypeCheckExpression(n.expression));
+    if (guard)
+      return;
+    const propName = (_b = (_a = node.property) == null ? void 0 : _a.$refText) != null ? _b : "<property>";
+    accept(
+      "error",
+      `'parent' access must be wrapped in an 'if (parent is SomeActor)' check. An Item can be owned by any Actor type, so ISDL needs to know which Actor's fields you mean before it can resolve 'parent.${propName}'.
+
+Example:
+    if (parent is Hero) {
+        parent.${propName} -= 1
+    }`,
+      { node, property: "property" }
+    );
+  }
+  /**
+   * `target.X` only resolves inside an `if (target is SomeActor)` check, for the same
+   * reason as `parent` — the targeted token can be any Actor type. Surface a clear
+   * message when the guard is missing.
+   */
+  validateTargetAccess(node, accept) {
+    var _a, _b;
+    const guard = ast_utils_exports.getContainerOfType(node, (n) => isIfStatement(n) && isTargetTypeCheckExpression(n.expression));
+    if (guard)
+      return;
+    const propName = (_b = (_a = node.property) == null ? void 0 : _a.$refText) != null ? _b : "<property>";
+    accept(
+      "error",
+      `'target' access must be wrapped in an 'if (target is SomeActor)' check. The targeted token can be any Actor type, so ISDL needs to know which Actor's fields you mean before it can resolve 'target.${propName}'.
+
+Example:
+    if (target is Monster) {
+        target.${propName} -= 1
+    }`,
+      { node, property: "property" }
+    );
+  }
   validateNumericExpression(body, accept) {
     for (const expr of body) {
       if (isReturnExpression(expr) && expr.value) {