humanpages 1.2.4 → 1.3.0
This diff represents the content of publicly available package versions that have been released to one of the supported registries. The information contained in this diff is provided for informational purposes only and reflects changes between package versions as they appear in their respective public registries.
- package/README.md +33 -12
- package/dist/tools.js +193 -60
- package/package.json +4 -3
- package/playbooks/community-management.md +210 -0
- package/playbooks/competitor-monitoring.md +193 -0
- package/playbooks/directory-submissions.md +331 -0
- package/playbooks/localization.md +199 -0
- package/playbooks/qa-testing.md +187 -0
|
@@ -0,0 +1,210 @@
|
|
|
1
|
+
# Community Management Playbook
|
|
2
|
+
|
|
3
|
+
Hire a human to manage your online community on a daily basis. Community management requires empathy, judgment, cultural awareness, and the ability to de-escalate conflict — tasks that remain firmly human.
|
|
4
|
+
|
|
5
|
+
---
|
|
6
|
+
|
|
7
|
+
## When to Use
|
|
8
|
+
|
|
9
|
+
- Your product has an active community (Discord, Slack, forum, Telegram, subreddit) that needs daily attention
|
|
10
|
+
- User questions are going unanswered for more than 24 hours
|
|
11
|
+
- You're seeing spam, toxicity, or off-topic content that needs moderation
|
|
12
|
+
- You want to build community engagement proactively (not just reactive support)
|
|
13
|
+
- You're launching a community and need someone to seed conversations and welcome new members
|
|
14
|
+
|
|
15
|
+
## Why a Human Is Needed
|
|
16
|
+
|
|
17
|
+
Community management is fundamentally a relationship-building activity. Members need to feel heard by a real person. Moderation decisions require judgment calls about tone, intent, and context that automated systems get wrong. A human community manager can read the room, de-escalate tensions before they become crises, identify power users to elevate, and create the kind of authentic engagement that builds loyalty. Bots managing communities feel like bots — and community members leave.
|
|
18
|
+
|
|
19
|
+
## Search Criteria
|
|
20
|
+
|
|
21
|
+
**Primary search:**
|
|
22
|
+
```json
|
|
23
|
+
{
|
|
24
|
+
"skill": "community management",
|
|
25
|
+
"available_now": true,
|
|
26
|
+
"limit": 10
|
|
27
|
+
}
|
|
28
|
+
```
|
|
29
|
+
|
|
30
|
+
**Fallback search:**
|
|
31
|
+
```json
|
|
32
|
+
{
|
|
33
|
+
"skill": "moderation",
|
|
34
|
+
"available_now": true,
|
|
35
|
+
"limit": 10
|
|
36
|
+
}
|
|
37
|
+
```
|
|
38
|
+
|
|
39
|
+
**Second fallback:**
|
|
40
|
+
```json
|
|
41
|
+
{
|
|
42
|
+
"skill": "customer support",
|
|
43
|
+
"available_now": true,
|
|
44
|
+
"limit": 10
|
|
45
|
+
}
|
|
46
|
+
```
|
|
47
|
+
|
|
48
|
+
## Candidate Evaluation
|
|
49
|
+
|
|
50
|
+
Priority criteria when reviewing `get_human_profile` results:
|
|
51
|
+
|
|
52
|
+
1. **Community management experience** — prior experience moderating Discord, Slack, forums, or social media communities
|
|
53
|
+
2. **Communication style** — warm, professional, and empathetic; check their bio for tone
|
|
54
|
+
3. **Timezone coverage** — should be active during your community's peak hours
|
|
55
|
+
4. **Platform familiarity** — experience with the specific platform you use (Discord roles, Slack workflows, Reddit moderation tools, etc.)
|
|
56
|
+
5. **Language skills** — must be fluent in your community's primary language; multilingual is a bonus for international communities
|
|
57
|
+
6. **Availability commitment** — community management requires daily presence, not occasional check-ins
|
|
58
|
+
|
|
59
|
+
## Job Offer Template
|
|
60
|
+
|
|
61
|
+
**Title:** Daily community management for [COMMUNITY_NAME] on [PLATFORM]
|
|
62
|
+
|
|
63
|
+
**Description:**
|
|
64
|
+
```
|
|
65
|
+
Manage the [COMMUNITY_NAME] community on [PLATFORM] ([INVITE_LINK]).
|
|
66
|
+
|
|
67
|
+
Daily responsibilities:
|
|
68
|
+
1. **Welcome new members** — greet new joins within [N] hours, point
|
|
69
|
+
them to introductions channel and key resources
|
|
70
|
+
2. **Answer questions** — respond to user questions or route them to
|
|
71
|
+
the right person/channel. Aim for < [N]-hour first response time
|
|
72
|
+
3. **Moderate content** — remove spam, enforce community guidelines,
|
|
73
|
+
warn or mute rule violators
|
|
74
|
+
4. **Engage proactively** — start [N] conversations/week, share
|
|
75
|
+
relevant content, highlight interesting user contributions
|
|
76
|
+
5. **Escalate issues** — flag technical bugs, feature requests, and
|
|
77
|
+
serious incidents to me immediately via [ESCALATION_CHANNEL]
|
|
78
|
+
6. **Weekly summary** — deliver a structured report every [DAY]
|
|
79
|
+
|
|
80
|
+
Community guidelines: [LINK_TO_GUIDELINES]
|
|
81
|
+
Key resources to share with members: [LINK_TO_FAQ_OR_DOCS]
|
|
82
|
+
Escalation contact: [YOUR_CONTACT]
|
|
83
|
+
|
|
84
|
+
Active hours required: [TIMEZONE] [START_TIME]-[END_TIME], [DAYS]
|
|
85
|
+
|
|
86
|
+
Weekly summary format:
|
|
87
|
+
- New members this week: [count]
|
|
88
|
+
- Messages/posts this week: [count]
|
|
89
|
+
- Questions answered: [count]
|
|
90
|
+
- Issues escalated: [list]
|
|
91
|
+
- Top discussions/threads: [list with links]
|
|
92
|
+
- Spam/moderation actions: [count and summary]
|
|
93
|
+
- Community sentiment: [positive/neutral/negative + explanation]
|
|
94
|
+
- Suggestions for improvement: [2-3 ideas]
|
|
95
|
+
```
|
|
96
|
+
|
|
97
|
+
**Suggested price:** $50-100 per week, depending on community size and activity level. Small community (< 100 active members): $50/week. Medium (100-500 active): $75/week. Large (500+ active): $100/week.
|
|
98
|
+
|
|
99
|
+
## Expected Deliverables
|
|
100
|
+
|
|
101
|
+
1. Daily presence in the community during agreed hours (verifiable via message timestamps)
|
|
102
|
+
2. Responses to user questions within the agreed SLA (e.g., 4-hour first response)
|
|
103
|
+
3. Moderation actions logged (spam removed, warnings issued, bans with reason)
|
|
104
|
+
4. Weekly summary report covering all metrics listed in the job description
|
|
105
|
+
5. Escalation of critical issues in real-time via the agreed channel
|
|
106
|
+
6. Proactive engagement: conversation starters, content shares, member highlights
|
|
107
|
+
|
|
108
|
+
## Verification Criteria
|
|
109
|
+
|
|
110
|
+
Before calling `mark_job_paid` (weekly):
|
|
111
|
+
|
|
112
|
+
1. **Presence check** — review message timestamps to confirm daily activity during agreed hours
|
|
113
|
+
2. **Response time** — spot-check 3-5 user questions and measure time-to-first-response against SLA
|
|
114
|
+
3. **Moderation quality** — review moderation log; actions should be justified and proportionate
|
|
115
|
+
4. **Weekly summary delivered** — report should be on time, complete, and contain actionable insights
|
|
116
|
+
5. **No unanswered questions** — scan channels for questions that went unaddressed for more than the SLA period
|
|
117
|
+
6. **Community health** — subjective check: does the community feel more active and welcoming than before?
|
|
118
|
+
|
|
119
|
+
## Communication Template
|
|
120
|
+
|
|
121
|
+
**First message after job offer is accepted:**
|
|
122
|
+
|
|
123
|
+
```
|
|
124
|
+
Hi [NAME], welcome aboard!
|
|
125
|
+
|
|
126
|
+
Here's everything you need to get started:
|
|
127
|
+
|
|
128
|
+
Community access:
|
|
129
|
+
- Platform: [PLATFORM]
|
|
130
|
+
- Invite link: [INVITE_LINK]
|
|
131
|
+
- Your role/permissions: [ROLE] (I'll assign this once you join)
|
|
132
|
+
|
|
133
|
+
Key channels:
|
|
134
|
+
- #general — main discussion
|
|
135
|
+
- #help — user questions (priority channel)
|
|
136
|
+
- #introductions — new member welcomes
|
|
137
|
+
- #announcements — official announcements (only I post here)
|
|
138
|
+
|
|
139
|
+
Community guidelines: [LINK]
|
|
140
|
+
FAQ / documentation: [LINK]
|
|
141
|
+
|
|
142
|
+
Your schedule:
|
|
143
|
+
- Active hours: [TIMEZONE] [HOURS], [DAYS]
|
|
144
|
+
- Weekly summary due: [DAY] by [TIME]
|
|
145
|
+
- Escalation: DM me on [PLATFORM] or message me here for anything
|
|
146
|
+
urgent (bugs, angry users, security issues)
|
|
147
|
+
|
|
148
|
+
For the first week, focus on:
|
|
149
|
+
1. Learning the community culture — read recent conversations
|
|
150
|
+
2. Introducing yourself (I'll announce you as a community manager)
|
|
151
|
+
3. Responding to any unanswered questions in #help
|
|
152
|
+
4. Identifying the top 5 most active members (good candidates for
|
|
153
|
+
community champions later)
|
|
154
|
+
|
|
155
|
+
Don't hesitate to ask me if anything is unclear. I'd rather you ask
|
|
156
|
+
than guess, especially for moderation decisions in the first week.
|
|
157
|
+
```
|
|
158
|
+
|
|
159
|
+
## Estimated Timeline
|
|
160
|
+
|
|
161
|
+
- **Onboarding:** 1-2 days to learn the community, culture, and tools
|
|
162
|
+
- **Daily time commitment:** 2-4 hours per day, depending on community activity
|
|
163
|
+
- **Weekly summary:** 30-60 minutes to compile
|
|
164
|
+
- **First week:** Expect reduced efficiency as the manager learns the community
|
|
165
|
+
|
|
166
|
+
## Recurring Schedule
|
|
167
|
+
|
|
168
|
+
**Cadence:** Daily (with weekly summary and payment)
|
|
169
|
+
|
|
170
|
+
**Weekly workflow:**
|
|
171
|
+
1. Monday: Review previous week's summary, set focus areas for the new week
|
|
172
|
+
2. Daily: Community manager is active during agreed hours, handles all responsibilities
|
|
173
|
+
3. Friday/Saturday: Community manager compiles weekly summary
|
|
174
|
+
4. Weekly review: Verify deliverables, provide feedback, pay for the week
|
|
175
|
+
5. Create next week's job (or use a standing arrangement if the platform supports it)
|
|
176
|
+
|
|
177
|
+
**Monthly review:**
|
|
178
|
+
- Assess community health metrics trend (growing? stagnating? declining?)
|
|
179
|
+
- Review moderation patterns — are the same issues recurring? Update guidelines if so
|
|
180
|
+
- Discuss with the community manager what's working and what needs adjustment
|
|
181
|
+
- Adjust compensation if the community has grown significantly
|
|
182
|
+
|
|
183
|
+
**Scaling:**
|
|
184
|
+
- At 500+ active members, consider a second community manager for timezone coverage
|
|
185
|
+
- At 1000+ members, consider specialized roles: moderator, content creator, support lead
|
|
186
|
+
- Community managers can help recruit and train additional moderators from the community
|
|
187
|
+
|
|
188
|
+
---
|
|
189
|
+
|
|
190
|
+
## Example Agent Workflow
|
|
191
|
+
|
|
192
|
+
```
|
|
193
|
+
1. search_humans({ skill: "community management", available_now: true, limit: 10 })
|
|
194
|
+
2. For each candidate: get_human_profile({ username: candidate.username })
|
|
195
|
+
3. Select best candidate based on evaluation criteria (especially timezone and platform experience)
|
|
196
|
+
4. create_job_offer({
|
|
197
|
+
human_username: selected.username,
|
|
198
|
+
title: "Daily community management for MyApp Discord — Week 1",
|
|
199
|
+
description: "...[filled template]...",
|
|
200
|
+
price: 75,
|
|
201
|
+
currency: "USD"
|
|
202
|
+
})
|
|
203
|
+
5. send_job_message({ job_id: job.id, message: "...[onboarding template]..." })
|
|
204
|
+
6. Grant community platform permissions to the new manager
|
|
205
|
+
7. Monitor: check community activity daily, get_job_status({ job_id: job.id }) at week end
|
|
206
|
+
8. Review weekly summary against verification criteria
|
|
207
|
+
9. mark_job_paid({ job_id: job.id })
|
|
208
|
+
10. leave_review({ job_id: job.id, rating: 5, comment: "..." })
|
|
209
|
+
11. Create next week's job offer (adjusting focus areas based on this week's summary)
|
|
210
|
+
```
|
|
@@ -0,0 +1,193 @@
|
|
|
1
|
+
# Competitor Monitoring Playbook
|
|
2
|
+
|
|
3
|
+
Hire a human to track competitor changes on a recurring basis. Humans can spot subtle shifts in positioning, pricing, features, and messaging that automated scrapers miss or misinterpret.
|
|
4
|
+
|
|
5
|
+
---
|
|
6
|
+
|
|
7
|
+
## When to Use
|
|
8
|
+
|
|
9
|
+
- You need ongoing intelligence on 2-5 key competitors
|
|
10
|
+
- A competitor has launched a new feature or changed pricing
|
|
11
|
+
- You're preparing a pitch, fundraise, or strategy document and need current competitive landscape data
|
|
12
|
+
- Your automated monitoring tools have gaps (e.g., competitors use dynamic rendering, gated content, or change URLs frequently)
|
|
13
|
+
|
|
14
|
+
## Why a Human Is Needed
|
|
15
|
+
|
|
16
|
+
Competitor websites use dynamic content, A/B tests, gated pricing pages, and interactive demos that scrapers handle poorly. A human can navigate a competitor's product as a real user would: sign up for trials, read changelogs, join communities, and interpret qualitative changes in positioning. They can distinguish meaningful changes from cosmetic updates and provide contextual analysis an automated diff cannot.
|
|
17
|
+
|
|
18
|
+
## Search Criteria
|
|
19
|
+
|
|
20
|
+
**Primary search:**
|
|
21
|
+
```json
|
|
22
|
+
{
|
|
23
|
+
"skill": "market research",
|
|
24
|
+
"available_now": true,
|
|
25
|
+
"limit": 10
|
|
26
|
+
}
|
|
27
|
+
```
|
|
28
|
+
|
|
29
|
+
**Fallback search:**
|
|
30
|
+
```json
|
|
31
|
+
{
|
|
32
|
+
"skill": "research",
|
|
33
|
+
"available_now": true,
|
|
34
|
+
"limit": 10
|
|
35
|
+
}
|
|
36
|
+
```
|
|
37
|
+
|
|
38
|
+
**Second fallback:**
|
|
39
|
+
```json
|
|
40
|
+
{
|
|
41
|
+
"skill": "data analysis",
|
|
42
|
+
"available_now": true,
|
|
43
|
+
"limit": 10
|
|
44
|
+
}
|
|
45
|
+
```
|
|
46
|
+
|
|
47
|
+
## Candidate Evaluation
|
|
48
|
+
|
|
49
|
+
Priority criteria when reviewing `get_human_profile` results:
|
|
50
|
+
|
|
51
|
+
1. **Research or analyst experience** — profiles mentioning market research, competitive analysis, or business intelligence
|
|
52
|
+
2. **Attention to detail** — ability to spot subtle differences week-over-week
|
|
53
|
+
3. **Writing quality** — reports must be clear, structured, and actionable
|
|
54
|
+
4. **Industry familiarity** — a candidate who understands your market will catch more meaningful changes
|
|
55
|
+
5. **Consistency** — for recurring tasks, prefer candidates who can commit weekly
|
|
56
|
+
|
|
57
|
+
## Job Offer Template
|
|
58
|
+
|
|
59
|
+
**Title:** Weekly competitor monitoring report — [YOUR_PRODUCT] vs [COMPETITOR_NAMES]
|
|
60
|
+
|
|
61
|
+
**Description:**
|
|
62
|
+
```
|
|
63
|
+
Track the following competitors and deliver a weekly diff report:
|
|
64
|
+
|
|
65
|
+
Competitors to monitor:
|
|
66
|
+
1. [COMPETITOR_1] — [URL_1]
|
|
67
|
+
2. [COMPETITOR_2] — [URL_2]
|
|
68
|
+
3. [COMPETITOR_3] — [URL_3]
|
|
69
|
+
|
|
70
|
+
For each competitor, check and report on:
|
|
71
|
+
|
|
72
|
+
**Pricing & Plans**
|
|
73
|
+
- Any changes to pricing, tiers, or feature packaging
|
|
74
|
+
- New promotions, discounts, or trial offers
|
|
75
|
+
- Changes to free tier limits
|
|
76
|
+
|
|
77
|
+
**Product & Features**
|
|
78
|
+
- New features announced or shipped
|
|
79
|
+
- Changes to existing features
|
|
80
|
+
- Changelog or release notes updates
|
|
81
|
+
- New integrations or partnerships
|
|
82
|
+
|
|
83
|
+
**Positioning & Messaging**
|
|
84
|
+
- Changes to homepage headline, tagline, or hero section
|
|
85
|
+
- New landing pages or campaign pages
|
|
86
|
+
- Changes to "about" or "why us" messaging
|
|
87
|
+
- New case studies or testimonials
|
|
88
|
+
|
|
89
|
+
**Content & Community**
|
|
90
|
+
- New blog posts, guides, or documentation
|
|
91
|
+
- Social media activity highlights (major announcements only)
|
|
92
|
+
- Community forum activity or sentiment shifts
|
|
93
|
+
- Job postings (indicate growth areas)
|
|
94
|
+
|
|
95
|
+
**Report format:**
|
|
96
|
+
For each competitor, structure as:
|
|
97
|
+
| Area | Last Week | This Week | Significance (high/med/low) |
|
|
98
|
+
|
|
99
|
+
End with a "Key Takeaways" section: 3-5 bullet points on what
|
|
100
|
+
matters most for [YOUR_PRODUCT] strategy.
|
|
101
|
+
```
|
|
102
|
+
|
|
103
|
+
**Suggested price:** $10-25 per weekly report, depending on the number of competitors and depth of analysis. 2-3 competitors at surface level: $10. 4-5 competitors with deep analysis: $20-25.
|
|
104
|
+
|
|
105
|
+
## Expected Deliverables
|
|
106
|
+
|
|
107
|
+
1. Structured diff report in markdown, organized by competitor and category
|
|
108
|
+
2. Screenshots of any significant visual or messaging changes
|
|
109
|
+
3. Links to new content, features, or announcements discovered
|
|
110
|
+
4. Significance ratings (high/medium/low) for each change
|
|
111
|
+
5. Key takeaways section with strategic implications for your product
|
|
112
|
+
6. Archived snapshots or URLs for reference (in case pages change again before you review)
|
|
113
|
+
|
|
114
|
+
## Verification Criteria
|
|
115
|
+
|
|
116
|
+
Before calling `mark_job_paid`:
|
|
117
|
+
|
|
118
|
+
1. **Coverage** — all listed competitors should be included in the report
|
|
119
|
+
2. **Accuracy** — spot-check 2-3 reported changes by visiting the competitor sites yourself
|
|
120
|
+
3. **Recency** — changes should be from the current week, not stale data from previous reports
|
|
121
|
+
4. **Actionability** — the key takeaways should contain specific, strategic insights, not generic observations like "they updated their website"
|
|
122
|
+
5. **Consistency** — if this is a recurring engagement, the format should match previous weeks for easy comparison
|
|
123
|
+
|
|
124
|
+
## Communication Template
|
|
125
|
+
|
|
126
|
+
**First message after job offer is accepted:**
|
|
127
|
+
|
|
128
|
+
```
|
|
129
|
+
Hi [NAME], thanks for taking this on!
|
|
130
|
+
|
|
131
|
+
Here's what I need each week:
|
|
132
|
+
|
|
133
|
+
Monitor these [N] competitors and send me a structured report by
|
|
134
|
+
[DAY_OF_WEEK]. Focus on changes since the last report — I don't need
|
|
135
|
+
a full overview each time, just what's new or different.
|
|
136
|
+
|
|
137
|
+
Priority areas for me right now:
|
|
138
|
+
- [SPECIFIC_CONCERN_1, e.g., "pricing changes — we're about to adjust ours"]
|
|
139
|
+
- [SPECIFIC_CONCERN_2, e.g., "any new AI features they ship"]
|
|
140
|
+
|
|
141
|
+
For the first report, include a baseline snapshot of each competitor's
|
|
142
|
+
current state so we have something to diff against going forward.
|
|
143
|
+
|
|
144
|
+
If you spot something urgent (major pricing change, new product launch,
|
|
145
|
+
acquisition news), message me right away — don't wait for the weekly
|
|
146
|
+
report.
|
|
147
|
+
```
|
|
148
|
+
|
|
149
|
+
## Estimated Timeline
|
|
150
|
+
|
|
151
|
+
- **Per weekly report:** 2-4 hours of research
|
|
152
|
+
- **First report (baseline):** 4-6 hours (more thorough initial snapshot)
|
|
153
|
+
- **Delivery deadline:** Same day each week (e.g., every Monday by end of day)
|
|
154
|
+
|
|
155
|
+
## Recurring Schedule
|
|
156
|
+
|
|
157
|
+
**Cadence:** Weekly
|
|
158
|
+
|
|
159
|
+
**Weekly workflow:**
|
|
160
|
+
1. At the start of each week (or on a set day), check if the current monitoring job has been delivered
|
|
161
|
+
2. Review the report and verify against criteria
|
|
162
|
+
3. Pay and review if satisfactory
|
|
163
|
+
4. Create the next week's job offer, referencing any specific areas to watch based on previous findings
|
|
164
|
+
5. Adjust competitor list or focus areas as your strategy evolves
|
|
165
|
+
|
|
166
|
+
**Quarterly review:**
|
|
167
|
+
- Assess whether the competitor set is still correct
|
|
168
|
+
- Add new entrants, remove irrelevant competitors
|
|
169
|
+
- Adjust the reporting template based on what insights have been most valuable
|
|
170
|
+
- Consider increasing/decreasing scope and price accordingly
|
|
171
|
+
|
|
172
|
+
---
|
|
173
|
+
|
|
174
|
+
## Example Agent Workflow
|
|
175
|
+
|
|
176
|
+
```
|
|
177
|
+
1. search_humans({ skill: "market research", available_now: true, limit: 10 })
|
|
178
|
+
2. For each candidate: get_human_profile({ username: candidate.username })
|
|
179
|
+
3. Select best candidate based on evaluation criteria
|
|
180
|
+
4. create_job_offer({
|
|
181
|
+
human_username: selected.username,
|
|
182
|
+
title: "Weekly competitor monitoring — MyApp vs Competitor1, Competitor2",
|
|
183
|
+
description: "...[filled template]...",
|
|
184
|
+
price: 15,
|
|
185
|
+
currency: "USD"
|
|
186
|
+
})
|
|
187
|
+
5. send_job_message({ job_id: job.id, message: "...[communication template]..." })
|
|
188
|
+
6. Poll: get_job_status({ job_id: job.id }) weekly until status is "delivered"
|
|
189
|
+
7. Review report against verification criteria
|
|
190
|
+
8. mark_job_paid({ job_id: job.id })
|
|
191
|
+
9. leave_review({ job_id: job.id, rating: 5, comment: "..." })
|
|
192
|
+
10. Create next week's job offer with updated focus areas
|
|
193
|
+
```
|