holycodex 0.16.9-dev.106.1 → 0.16.9-dev.108.1
This diff represents the content of publicly available package versions that have been released to one of the supported registries. The information contained in this diff is provided for informational purposes only and reflects changes between package versions as they appear in their respective public registries.
- package/README.md +4 -4
- package/dist/agent.js +55 -64
- package/dist/assets/plugin/plugin.json +1 -1
- package/dist/assets/plugin/skills/babysit-ci/SKILL.md +9 -2
- package/dist/assets/plugin/skills/babysit-ci/agents/openai.yaml +1 -1
- package/dist/assets/plugin/skills/codebase-onboarding/agents/openai.yaml +1 -1
- package/dist/assets/plugin/skills/commit/agents/openai.yaml +1 -1
- package/dist/assets/plugin/skills/compress/agents/openai.yaml +1 -1
- package/dist/assets/plugin/skills/context7-cli/agents/openai.yaml +1 -1
- package/dist/assets/plugin/skills/continue-work/agents/openai.yaml +1 -1
- package/dist/assets/plugin/skills/debugging/agents/openai.yaml +1 -1
- package/dist/assets/plugin/skills/dev-server/SKILL.md +13 -0
- package/dist/assets/plugin/skills/dev-server/agents/openai.yaml +6 -0
- package/dist/assets/plugin/skills/grill-me/SKILL.md +9 -9
- package/dist/assets/plugin/skills/grill-me/agents/openai.yaml +2 -2
- package/dist/assets/plugin/skills/handoff/agents/openai.yaml +1 -1
- package/dist/assets/plugin/skills/refactor/agents/openai.yaml +1 -1
- package/dist/assets/plugin/skills/rules/agents/openai.yaml +1 -1
- package/dist/assets/plugin/skills/stop-slop/SKILL.md +3 -1
- package/dist/assets/plugin/skills/stop-slop/agents/openai.yaml +1 -1
- package/dist/assets/plugin/skills/stop-slop/references/examples.md +9 -63
- package/dist/assets/plugin/skills/stop-slop/references/phrases.md +4 -3
- package/dist/assets/plugin/skills/stop-slop/references/structures.md +10 -131
- package/dist/assets/plugin/skills/visual-loop/SKILL.md +17 -0
- package/dist/assets/plugin/skills/visual-loop/agents/openai.yaml +6 -0
- package/dist/assets/plugin/skills/web-visualize/SKILL.md +3 -4
- package/dist/assets/plugin/skills/web-visualize/agents/openai.yaml +1 -1
- package/dist/assets/plugin/skills/writing-instructions/SKILL.md +30 -62
- package/dist/assets/plugin/skills/writing-instructions/agents/openai.yaml +1 -1
- package/dist/index.js +53 -53
- package/package.json +2 -2
- package/dist/assets/plugin/skills/code-review/SKILL.md +0 -8
- package/dist/assets/plugin/skills/code-review/agents/openai.yaml +0 -6
- package/dist/assets/plugin/skills/operations/SKILL.md +0 -10
- package/dist/assets/plugin/skills/operations/agents/openai.yaml +0 -6
- package/dist/assets/plugin/skills/plan/SKILL.md +0 -10
- package/dist/assets/plugin/skills/plan/agents/openai.yaml +0 -6
- package/dist/assets/plugin/skills/plan-review/SKILL.md +0 -7
- package/dist/assets/plugin/skills/plan-review/agents/openai.yaml +0 -6
- package/dist/assets/plugin/skills/programming/SKILL.md +0 -7
- package/dist/assets/plugin/skills/programming/agents/openai.yaml +0 -6
|
@@ -5,6 +5,11 @@ description: Use when CI or release gates need follow-through; monitor their ter
|
|
|
5
5
|
|
|
6
6
|
# Babysit CI
|
|
7
7
|
|
|
8
|
+
Root owns orchestration and mutations; Worker.operations observes the assigned
|
|
9
|
+
gates. Dispatch independent checks and review observation concurrently.
|
|
10
|
+
Use only the gates in the user's requested scope. When asked to monitor CI
|
|
11
|
+
only or ignore review bots, omit review observation and review findings.
|
|
12
|
+
|
|
8
13
|
Discover the repository's development and release topology for pushes and pull
|
|
9
14
|
requests: refs, required checks, reviews, publication mechanism, and gate
|
|
10
15
|
dependencies. Do not assume a provider, branch name, or separate pipeline.
|
|
@@ -13,13 +18,15 @@ For a push, bind every observation to the exact pushed ref and SHA. For a pull
|
|
|
13
18
|
request, bind it to the current head SHA, target branch, pull-request identity,
|
|
14
19
|
and review commit when the provider exposes one. Inspect required checks and
|
|
15
20
|
relevant bot reviews, inline threads, issue comments, and commit comments. A
|
|
16
|
-
new push
|
|
17
|
-
|
|
21
|
+
new push requires CI and review evidence for the new head; reuse unchanged
|
|
22
|
+
topology and local proof that remains applicable.
|
|
18
23
|
|
|
19
24
|
Use bounded observer waits. Distinguish a bot that is absent or not configured
|
|
20
25
|
from a known bot with no terminal signal, and both from a clean terminal
|
|
21
26
|
disposition. Absence or no signal is an evidence gap. Green checks do not
|
|
22
27
|
resolve outstanding review findings or threads.
|
|
28
|
+
Include target-branch or pull-request mergeability evidence when exposed;
|
|
29
|
+
green checks alone do not prove mergeability.
|
|
23
30
|
|
|
24
31
|
After a development action, observe its exact ref and SHA to terminal state.
|
|
25
32
|
Repair failed checks and actionable review findings, then repeat validation and
|
|
@@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
|
|
|
1
1
|
interface:
|
|
2
2
|
display_name: "Babysit CI"
|
|
3
3
|
short_description: "Follow repository CI and release gates to completion."
|
|
4
|
-
default_prompt: "Use babysit-ci for this
|
|
4
|
+
default_prompt: "Use $babysit-ci for this task."
|
|
5
5
|
policy:
|
|
6
6
|
allow_implicit_invocation: true
|
|
@@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
|
|
|
1
1
|
interface:
|
|
2
2
|
display_name: "Codebase onboarding"
|
|
3
3
|
short_description: "Explain a repository from a bounded read-only map."
|
|
4
|
-
default_prompt: "
|
|
4
|
+
default_prompt: "Use $codebase-onboarding for this task."
|
|
5
5
|
policy:
|
|
6
6
|
allow_implicit_invocation: true
|
|
@@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
|
|
|
1
1
|
interface:
|
|
2
2
|
display_name: "Commit"
|
|
3
3
|
short_description: "Create coherent local commits with exact scope proof."
|
|
4
|
-
default_prompt: "
|
|
4
|
+
default_prompt: "Use $commit for this task."
|
|
5
5
|
policy:
|
|
6
6
|
allow_implicit_invocation: false
|
|
@@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
|
|
|
1
1
|
interface:
|
|
2
2
|
display_name: "Compress"
|
|
3
3
|
short_description: "Shorten assigned text without changing its contract or voice."
|
|
4
|
-
default_prompt: "
|
|
4
|
+
default_prompt: "Use $compress for this task."
|
|
5
5
|
policy:
|
|
6
6
|
allow_implicit_invocation: true
|
|
@@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
|
|
|
1
1
|
interface:
|
|
2
2
|
display_name: "Context7 CLI"
|
|
3
3
|
short_description: "Find assigned current library and API documentation first."
|
|
4
|
-
default_prompt: "
|
|
4
|
+
default_prompt: "Use $context7-cli for this task."
|
|
5
5
|
policy:
|
|
6
6
|
allow_implicit_invocation: false
|
|
@@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
|
|
|
1
1
|
interface:
|
|
2
2
|
display_name: "Continue work"
|
|
3
3
|
short_description: "Resume the current HolyCodex work from durable state."
|
|
4
|
-
default_prompt: "
|
|
4
|
+
default_prompt: "Use $continue-work for this task."
|
|
5
5
|
policy:
|
|
6
6
|
allow_implicit_invocation: true
|
|
@@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
|
|
|
1
1
|
interface:
|
|
2
2
|
display_name: "Debugging"
|
|
3
3
|
short_description: "Diagnose an observable defect through reproduction or strong evidence."
|
|
4
|
-
default_prompt: "
|
|
4
|
+
default_prompt: "Use $debugging for this task."
|
|
5
5
|
policy:
|
|
6
6
|
allow_implicit_invocation: false
|
|
@@ -0,0 +1,13 @@
|
|
|
1
|
+
---
|
|
2
|
+
name: dev-server
|
|
3
|
+
description: Use when a shared background development server is needed; let Root start, reuse, and manage one server for the session.
|
|
4
|
+
---
|
|
5
|
+
|
|
6
|
+
Root only. Reuse a healthy server for the current project; otherwise start the
|
|
7
|
+
repository's development command in the background using the active runtime's
|
|
8
|
+
process controls. Confirm readiness, return its URL, and share the URL with
|
|
9
|
+
specialists so they reuse it. Root retains the process handle. Keep it alive
|
|
10
|
+
across Assignments; restart only when configuration or server state requires
|
|
11
|
+
it. Stop only the process owned by this session when
|
|
12
|
+
no longer needed. Specialists request server changes through their terminal
|
|
13
|
+
report rather than starting competing servers.
|
|
@@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
|
|
|
1
1
|
---
|
|
2
2
|
name: grill-me
|
|
3
|
-
description: Use when
|
|
3
|
+
description: Use when Root needs an outcome-changing user decision; ask focused questions while independent work continues.
|
|
4
4
|
---
|
|
5
5
|
|
|
6
6
|
# Grill me
|
|
@@ -10,12 +10,12 @@ behavior, UX, compatibility, dependencies, cost, security, external effects,
|
|
|
10
10
|
or another meaningful user-visible result. Infer obvious safe defaults and
|
|
11
11
|
continue without questioning routine omissions.
|
|
12
12
|
|
|
13
|
-
|
|
14
|
-
|
|
15
|
-
|
|
16
|
-
|
|
17
|
-
|
|
13
|
+
Root only. Ask the smallest set of questions needed for the blocked decision,
|
|
14
|
+
in waves and in the user's language, using existing evidence and authorization.
|
|
15
|
+
Never ask what is already known. If no material questions remain, orchestrate
|
|
16
|
+
immediately. Continue independent authorized
|
|
17
|
+
work while awaiting the answer. Do not delay a necessary question for a
|
|
18
|
+
discovery ritual or ask about hypothetical later phases.
|
|
18
19
|
|
|
19
|
-
|
|
20
|
-
|
|
21
|
-
unblocked; use `needs_root_input` when the choice remains unresolved.
|
|
20
|
+
Record the decision in current Intent evidence. Use `needs_root_input` only
|
|
21
|
+
when the missing answer prevents further progress.
|
|
@@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
|
|
|
1
1
|
interface:
|
|
2
2
|
display_name: "Grill me"
|
|
3
3
|
short_description: "Ask only material, dependency-ordered clarification questions."
|
|
4
|
-
default_prompt: "
|
|
4
|
+
default_prompt: "Use $grill-me for this task."
|
|
5
5
|
policy:
|
|
6
|
-
allow_implicit_invocation:
|
|
6
|
+
allow_implicit_invocation: false
|
|
@@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
|
|
|
1
1
|
interface:
|
|
2
2
|
display_name: "Handoff"
|
|
3
3
|
short_description: "Export a redacted projection of current Intent state."
|
|
4
|
-
default_prompt: "
|
|
4
|
+
default_prompt: "Use $handoff for this task."
|
|
5
5
|
policy:
|
|
6
6
|
allow_implicit_invocation: false
|
|
@@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
|
|
|
1
1
|
interface:
|
|
2
2
|
display_name: "Refactor"
|
|
3
3
|
short_description: "Restructure one decided seam while preserving its contract."
|
|
4
|
-
default_prompt: "
|
|
4
|
+
default_prompt: "Use $refactor for this task."
|
|
5
5
|
policy:
|
|
6
6
|
allow_implicit_invocation: true
|
|
@@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
|
|
|
1
1
|
interface:
|
|
2
2
|
display_name: "Rules"
|
|
3
3
|
short_description: "Trace one repository rule discovery or application failure."
|
|
4
|
-
default_prompt: "
|
|
4
|
+
default_prompt: "Use $rules for this task."
|
|
5
5
|
policy:
|
|
6
6
|
allow_implicit_invocation: false
|
|
@@ -4,6 +4,8 @@ description: Use when assigned prose has predictable AI writing patterns; remove
|
|
|
4
4
|
---
|
|
5
5
|
|
|
6
6
|
Edit only the assigned prose. Remove filler, formulaic structure, vague claims,
|
|
7
|
-
passive voice, and repeated rhythm while preserving meaning and voice.
|
|
7
|
+
unnecessary passive voice, and repeated rhythm while preserving meaning and voice.
|
|
8
|
+
Treat reference examples as candidates, not bans on ordinary grammar. Preserve
|
|
9
|
+
qualifiers, uncertainty, factual distinctions, and technical precision. Use the
|
|
8
10
|
linked [phrase](references/phrases.md), [structure](references/structures.md),
|
|
9
11
|
and [example](references/examples.md) references when needed.
|
|
@@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
|
|
|
1
1
|
interface:
|
|
2
2
|
display_name: "Stop Slop"
|
|
3
3
|
short_description: "Edit assigned prose to remove predictable AI patterns."
|
|
4
|
-
default_prompt: "
|
|
4
|
+
default_prompt: "Use $stop-slop for this task."
|
|
5
5
|
policy:
|
|
6
6
|
allow_implicit_invocation: true
|
|
@@ -1,69 +1,15 @@
|
|
|
1
|
-
#
|
|
1
|
+
# Examples
|
|
2
2
|
|
|
3
|
-
|
|
3
|
+
Before: "It turns out that most teams struggle with alignment. The uncomfortable
|
|
4
|
+
truth is that nobody wants to admit they're confused. And that's okay."
|
|
4
5
|
|
|
5
|
-
|
|
6
|
+
After: "Most teams struggle with alignment. People may hesitate to admit confusion."
|
|
6
7
|
|
|
7
|
-
|
|
8
|
+
Remove the framing while retaining the qualification and uncertainty.
|
|
8
9
|
|
|
9
|
-
|
|
10
|
+
Before: "In today's fast-paced landscape, we need to lean into discomfort and
|
|
11
|
+
navigate uncertainty with clarity. This matters because your competition isn't waiting."
|
|
10
12
|
|
|
11
|
-
|
|
13
|
+
After: "We need to handle uncertainty clearly and keep pace with competitors."
|
|
12
14
|
|
|
13
|
-
|
|
14
|
-
|
|
15
|
-
---
|
|
16
|
-
|
|
17
|
-
## Example 2: Filler + Unnecessary Reassurance
|
|
18
|
-
|
|
19
|
-
**Before:**
|
|
20
|
-
|
|
21
|
-
> "It turns out that most teams struggle with alignment. The uncomfortable truth is that nobody wants to admit they're confused. And that's okay."
|
|
22
|
-
|
|
23
|
-
**After:**
|
|
24
|
-
|
|
25
|
-
> "Teams struggle with alignment. Nobody admits confusion."
|
|
26
|
-
|
|
27
|
-
**Changes:** Cut hedging ("most"), removed throat-clearing phrases, deleted permission-granting ending.
|
|
28
|
-
|
|
29
|
-
---
|
|
30
|
-
|
|
31
|
-
## Example 3: Business Jargon Stack
|
|
32
|
-
|
|
33
|
-
**Before:**
|
|
34
|
-
|
|
35
|
-
> "In today's fast-paced landscape, we need to lean into discomfort and navigate uncertainty with clarity. This matters because your competition isn't waiting."
|
|
36
|
-
|
|
37
|
-
**After:**
|
|
38
|
-
|
|
39
|
-
> "Move faster. Your competition is."
|
|
40
|
-
|
|
41
|
-
**Changes:** Eliminated jargon entirely. Core message in six words.
|
|
42
|
-
|
|
43
|
-
---
|
|
44
|
-
|
|
45
|
-
## Example 4: Dramatic Fragmentation
|
|
46
|
-
|
|
47
|
-
**Before:**
|
|
48
|
-
|
|
49
|
-
> "Speed. Quality. Cost. You can only pick two. That's it. That's the tradeoff."
|
|
50
|
-
|
|
51
|
-
**After:**
|
|
52
|
-
|
|
53
|
-
> "Speed, quality, cost—pick two."
|
|
54
|
-
|
|
55
|
-
**Changes:** Single sentence. No performative emphasis.
|
|
56
|
-
|
|
57
|
-
---
|
|
58
|
-
|
|
59
|
-
## Example 5: Rhetorical Setup
|
|
60
|
-
|
|
61
|
-
**Before:**
|
|
62
|
-
|
|
63
|
-
> "What if I told you that the best teams don't optimize for productivity? Here's what I mean: they optimize for learning. Think about it."
|
|
64
|
-
|
|
65
|
-
**After:**
|
|
66
|
-
|
|
67
|
-
> "The best teams optimize for learning, not productivity."
|
|
68
|
-
|
|
69
|
-
**Changes:** Direct claim. No rhetorical scaffolding.
|
|
15
|
+
Replace jargon without dropping the original requirement or inventing a new claim.
|
|
@@ -20,11 +20,11 @@ Remove these announcement phrases. State the content directly.
|
|
|
20
20
|
- "Here's what I find interesting"
|
|
21
21
|
- "Here's the problem though"
|
|
22
22
|
|
|
23
|
-
|
|
23
|
+
Cut an opener when it adds no information.
|
|
24
24
|
|
|
25
25
|
## Emphasis Crutches
|
|
26
26
|
|
|
27
|
-
|
|
27
|
+
Delete these when they add no meaning.
|
|
28
28
|
|
|
29
29
|
- "Full stop." / "Period."
|
|
30
30
|
- "Let that sink in."
|
|
@@ -52,7 +52,8 @@ Replace with plain language.
|
|
|
52
52
|
|
|
53
53
|
## Adverbs
|
|
54
54
|
|
|
55
|
-
|
|
55
|
+
Remove empty intensifiers and redundant hedges. Keep adverbs and qualifiers
|
|
56
|
+
that convey degree, timing, uncertainty, or a technical distinction.
|
|
56
57
|
|
|
57
58
|
Specific offenders:
|
|
58
59
|
|
|
@@ -1,134 +1,13 @@
|
|
|
1
|
-
# Structures to
|
|
1
|
+
# Structures to reconsider
|
|
2
2
|
|
|
3
|
-
|
|
3
|
+
Remove formulaic framing when it obscures the content: repeated binary contrasts,
|
|
4
|
+
rhetorical questions immediately answered, manufactured drama, and strings of
|
|
5
|
+
punchy fragments. State the concrete claim and its evidence.
|
|
4
6
|
|
|
5
|
-
|
|
7
|
+
Name the actor when it matters. Use active voice when clearer; passive voice is
|
|
8
|
+
useful when the actor is unknown or the object is the focus. Metaphors and ordinary
|
|
9
|
+
sentence openings are acceptable when they serve the assigned voice.
|
|
6
10
|
|
|
7
|
-
|
|
8
|
-
|
|
9
|
-
|
|
10
|
-
| "[X] isn't the problem. [Y] is." | Formulaic reframe |
|
|
11
|
-
| "The answer isn't X. It's Y." | Predictable pivot |
|
|
12
|
-
| "It feels like X. It's actually Y." | Setup/reveal cliche |
|
|
13
|
-
| "The question isn't X. It's Y." | Rhetorical misdirection |
|
|
14
|
-
| "Not X. But Y." / "not X, it's Y" / "isn't X, it's Y" | Mechanical contrast |
|
|
15
|
-
| "It's not this. It's that." | Same formula, different words |
|
|
16
|
-
| "stops being X and starts being Y" | False transformation arc |
|
|
17
|
-
| "doesn't mean X, but actually Y" | Negation-then-assertion crutch |
|
|
18
|
-
| "is about X but not Y" | False distinction |
|
|
19
|
-
| "not just X but also Y" | Additive hedge |
|
|
20
|
-
|
|
21
|
-
**Instead:** State Y directly. "The problem is Y." "Y matters here." Drop the negation entirely.
|
|
22
|
-
|
|
23
|
-
## Negative Listing
|
|
24
|
-
|
|
25
|
-
Listing what something is _not_ before revealing what it _is_. A rhetorical striptease.
|
|
26
|
-
|
|
27
|
-
| Pattern | Problem |
|
|
28
|
-
| ------------------------------------- | --------------------------------- |
|
|
29
|
-
| "Not a X... Not a Y... A Z." | Dramatic buildup through negation |
|
|
30
|
-
| "It wasn't X. It wasn't Y. It was Z." | Same structure, past tense |
|
|
31
|
-
|
|
32
|
-
**Instead:** State Z. The reader doesn't need the runway.
|
|
33
|
-
|
|
34
|
-
## Dramatic Fragmentation
|
|
35
|
-
|
|
36
|
-
Sentence fragments for emphasis read as manufactured profundity.
|
|
37
|
-
|
|
38
|
-
| Pattern | Problem |
|
|
39
|
-
| ---------------------------------------- | ----------------------- |
|
|
40
|
-
| "[Noun]. That's it. That's the [thing]." | Performative simplicity |
|
|
41
|
-
| "X. And Y. And Z." | Staccato drama |
|
|
42
|
-
| "This unlocks something. [Word]." | Artificial revelation |
|
|
43
|
-
|
|
44
|
-
**Instead:** Complete sentences. Trust content over presentation.
|
|
45
|
-
|
|
46
|
-
## Rhetorical Setups
|
|
47
|
-
|
|
48
|
-
These announce insight rather than deliver it.
|
|
49
|
-
|
|
50
|
-
| Pattern | Problem |
|
|
51
|
-
| --------------------- | ---------------------- |
|
|
52
|
-
| "What if [reframe]?" | Socratic posturing |
|
|
53
|
-
| "Here's what I mean:" | Redundant preview |
|
|
54
|
-
| "Think about it:" | Condescending prompt |
|
|
55
|
-
| "And that's okay." | Unnecessary permission |
|
|
56
|
-
|
|
57
|
-
**Instead:** Make the point. Let readers draw conclusions.
|
|
58
|
-
|
|
59
|
-
## Formulaic Constructions
|
|
60
|
-
|
|
61
|
-
| Pattern | Problem |
|
|
62
|
-
| ------------------------- | --------------------------- |
|
|
63
|
-
| "By the time X, I was Y." | Narrative template |
|
|
64
|
-
| "X that isn't Y" | Indirect. Say "X is broken" |
|
|
65
|
-
|
|
66
|
-
## False Agency
|
|
67
|
-
|
|
68
|
-
Giving inanimate things human verbs. Complaints don't "become" fixes. Bets don't "live or die." Decisions don't "emerge." A person does something to make those things happen. AI loves this because it avoids naming the actor.
|
|
69
|
-
|
|
70
|
-
| Pattern | Problem |
|
|
71
|
-
| ------------------------------- | ----------------------------------------------------------------- |
|
|
72
|
-
| "a complaint becomes a fix" | The complaint did nothing. Someone fixed it. |
|
|
73
|
-
| "a bet lives or dies in days" | Bets don't have lifespans. Someone kills the project or ships it. |
|
|
74
|
-
| "the decision emerges" | Decisions don't emerge. Someone decides. |
|
|
75
|
-
| "the culture shifts" | Cultures don't shift on their own. People change behavior. |
|
|
76
|
-
| "the conversation moves toward" | Conversations don't move. Someone steers. |
|
|
77
|
-
| "the data tells us" | Data sits there. Someone reads it and draws a conclusion. |
|
|
78
|
-
| "the market rewards" | Markets don't reward. Buyers pay for things. |
|
|
79
|
-
|
|
80
|
-
**Instead:** Name the human. "The team fixed it that week" beats "the complaint becomes a fix." If no specific person fits, use "you" to put the reader in the seat.
|
|
81
|
-
|
|
82
|
-
## Narrator-from-a-Distance
|
|
83
|
-
|
|
84
|
-
Floating above the scene instead of putting the reader in it.
|
|
85
|
-
|
|
86
|
-
| Pattern | Problem |
|
|
87
|
-
| ------------------------- | ----------------------- |
|
|
88
|
-
| "Nobody designed this." | Disembodied observation |
|
|
89
|
-
| "This happens because..." | Lecturer voice |
|
|
90
|
-
| "This is why..." | Same |
|
|
91
|
-
| "People tend to..." | Armchair sociologist |
|
|
92
|
-
|
|
93
|
-
**Instead:** Put the reader in the room. "You don't sit down one day and decide to..." beats "Nobody designed this."
|
|
94
|
-
|
|
95
|
-
## Passive Voice
|
|
96
|
-
|
|
97
|
-
Every sentence needs a subject doing something. Passive voice hides the actor and drains energy.
|
|
98
|
-
|
|
99
|
-
| Pattern | Fix |
|
|
100
|
-
| -------------------------- | -------------------- |
|
|
101
|
-
| "X was created" | Name who created it |
|
|
102
|
-
| "It is believed that" | Name who believes it |
|
|
103
|
-
| "Mistakes were made" | Name who made them |
|
|
104
|
-
| "The decision was reached" | Name who decided |
|
|
105
|
-
|
|
106
|
-
**Instead:** Find the actor. Put them at the front of the sentence.
|
|
107
|
-
|
|
108
|
-
## Sentence Starters to Avoid
|
|
109
|
-
|
|
110
|
-
| Pattern | Fix |
|
|
111
|
-
| --------------------------------------------------------------- | ----------------------------------------------- |
|
|
112
|
-
| Sentences starting with What, When, Where, Which, Who, Why, How | Restructure. Lead with the subject or the verb. |
|
|
113
|
-
| Paragraphs starting with "So" | Start with content |
|
|
114
|
-
| Sentences starting with "Look," | Remove |
|
|
115
|
-
|
|
116
|
-
Wh- openers become a crutch. "What makes this hard is..." becomes "The constraint is..." or better, name the specific constraint.
|
|
117
|
-
|
|
118
|
-
## Rhythm Patterns
|
|
119
|
-
|
|
120
|
-
| Pattern | Fix |
|
|
121
|
-
| ------------------------------ | --------------------------------------------------- |
|
|
122
|
-
| Three-item lists | Use two items or one |
|
|
123
|
-
| Questions answered immediately | Let questions breathe or cut them |
|
|
124
|
-
| Every paragraph ends punchily | Vary endings |
|
|
125
|
-
| Em-dashes | Remove. Use commas or periods. No em dashes at all. |
|
|
126
|
-
| Staccato fragmentation | Don't stack short punchy sentences |
|
|
127
|
-
| "Not always. Not perfectly." | Hedging disguised as reassurance |
|
|
128
|
-
|
|
129
|
-
## Word Patterns
|
|
130
|
-
|
|
131
|
-
| Pattern | Problem |
|
|
132
|
-
| ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ---------------------------------------------------------- |
|
|
133
|
-
| Lazy extremes (every, always, never, everyone, everybody, nobody) | False authority. Use specifics instead of sweeping claims. |
|
|
134
|
-
| All adverbs (-ly words, "really," "just," "literally," "genuinely," "honestly," "simply," "actually") | Empty emphasis. See phrases.md for full list. |
|
|
11
|
+
Vary rhythm without arbitrary bans on punctuation, three-item lists, question
|
|
12
|
+
words, or adverbs. Preserve meaningful contrast, qualifications, uncertainty,
|
|
13
|
+
and technical precision. Judge the passage rather than matching forbidden forms.
|
|
@@ -0,0 +1,17 @@
|
|
|
1
|
+
---
|
|
2
|
+
name: visual-loop
|
|
3
|
+
description: Use when visual changes need rendered judgment; let Root inspect the current result and assign concrete repairs.
|
|
4
|
+
---
|
|
5
|
+
|
|
6
|
+
Root only, for visual tasks. Orchestrate implementation, inspect its rendered
|
|
7
|
+
result, judge the visual output, dispatch targeted changes to specialists, and
|
|
8
|
+
repeat until the result is excellent and meets the user's requirements.
|
|
9
|
+
|
|
10
|
+
Follow the visual-inspection order generated for Root's selected capabilities.
|
|
11
|
+
Unselected capabilities are not fallbacks. Honor higher-priority active-surface
|
|
12
|
+
tool rules. Use the shared development server when needed. Inspect relevant viewports and
|
|
13
|
+
states against the user's requirements and repository design system. Report
|
|
14
|
+
the specific blocker if no available method supports the required judgment.
|
|
15
|
+
|
|
16
|
+
Reuse unaffected evidence. Do not run this loop for logic-only changes.
|
|
17
|
+
Specialists own implementation and delegated interaction checks.
|
|
@@ -5,10 +5,9 @@ description: Use when the user requests or approves an interactive visualization
|
|
|
5
5
|
|
|
6
6
|
Use ChatGPT Sites to create an interactive, user-facing visualization that
|
|
7
7
|
turns the supplied plan, analysis, design, structured information, or other
|
|
8
|
-
useful material into a clear, usable result.
|
|
9
|
-
|
|
10
|
-
|
|
11
|
-
approval before creating it.
|
|
8
|
+
useful material into a clear, usable result. A visualization request authorizes
|
|
9
|
+
its preparation. Root delegates implementation and judges the rendered result
|
|
10
|
+
with visual-loop; follow the active capability's publication boundary.
|
|
12
11
|
|
|
13
12
|
Return the visualization and enough context to verify that it answers the
|
|
14
13
|
request. If the requested result cannot be completed with an authorized,
|
|
@@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
|
|
|
1
1
|
interface:
|
|
2
2
|
display_name: "Web visualize"
|
|
3
3
|
short_description: "Turn useful information into an interactive user-facing visualization."
|
|
4
|
-
default_prompt: "
|
|
4
|
+
default_prompt: "Use $web-visualize for this task."
|
|
5
5
|
policy:
|
|
6
6
|
allow_implicit_invocation: true
|
|
@@ -5,65 +5,33 @@ description: Use when model-facing instructions need authorship or review; make
|
|
|
5
5
|
|
|
6
6
|
# Writing instructions
|
|
7
7
|
|
|
8
|
-
|
|
9
|
-
|
|
10
|
-
|
|
11
|
-
|
|
12
|
-
|
|
13
|
-
|
|
14
|
-
|
|
15
|
-
|
|
16
|
-
|
|
17
|
-
|
|
18
|
-
|
|
19
|
-
|
|
20
|
-
|
|
21
|
-
|
|
22
|
-
|
|
23
|
-
|
|
24
|
-
|
|
25
|
-
|
|
26
|
-
|
|
27
|
-
|
|
28
|
-
|
|
29
|
-
|
|
30
|
-
|
|
31
|
-
|
|
32
|
-
|
|
33
|
-
|
|
34
|
-
|
|
35
|
-
|
|
36
|
-
|
|
37
|
-
|
|
38
|
-
constraints, material decisions or blockers that escalate, and stopping
|
|
39
|
-
conditions. Keep required lifecycle and safety invariants explicit. Give the
|
|
40
|
-
receiver room to choose routine safe, reversible, in-scope steps. A contract must
|
|
41
|
-
carry authorized work through its requested terminal state, including required
|
|
42
|
-
repair and proof; a first pass or pending gate is not completion.
|
|
43
|
-
|
|
44
|
-
Remove older-model competence scaffolding, fixed recipes without a required
|
|
45
|
-
ordering constraint, broad reading rituals, stale environment facts, duplicate
|
|
46
|
-
policy, and unnecessary questionnaires. Preserve meaningful repository checks
|
|
47
|
-
and review gates through their canonical owners instead of reproducing them in
|
|
48
|
-
every skill. Use configuration for verbosity rather than generic style padding.
|
|
49
|
-
|
|
50
|
-
Use a skill for a distinct conditional workflow or tool capability. Keep its
|
|
51
|
-
description short and specific enough to distinguish the invocation from
|
|
52
|
-
nearby skills. Avoid broad triggers that compete for ordinary work; audit
|
|
53
|
-
implicit invocation against the other skills the receiver can load.
|
|
54
|
-
|
|
55
|
-
Keep the main body focused on the shared outcome, boundaries, and acceptance
|
|
56
|
-
criteria. Link branch-specific tool knowledge or uncommon procedures from the
|
|
57
|
-
condition that needs them, so only the selected branch loads that detail. Do
|
|
58
|
-
not split a short coherent rule merely to create more files.
|
|
59
|
-
|
|
60
|
-
Keep display and invocation metadata in agents/openai.yaml and behavior in its
|
|
61
|
-
single authoritative source. References should supply a missing decision or
|
|
62
|
-
mechanic, not copies of the body or global policy. Preserve provenance and
|
|
63
|
-
license attribution under the original upstream names when renaming a skill.
|
|
64
|
-
|
|
65
|
-
An instruction change is complete when the receiver can act within its authority,
|
|
66
|
-
recognize completion and escalation boundaries, and return sufficient evidence;
|
|
67
|
-
the effective context has no contradictory or duplicate rule for that meaning.
|
|
68
|
-
Validate changed behavior with meaningful proof and repository-required gates,
|
|
69
|
-
using the canonical testing policy rather than inventing extra test rituals.
|
|
8
|
+
Identify the receiver's effective context: instruction hierarchy, repository
|
|
9
|
+
rules, Root or Role.task policy, selected skills, tools, configuration, and
|
|
10
|
+
Assignment facts. Add only the missing constraints; resolve contradictions
|
|
11
|
+
against the governing authority. User instructions override skill guidelines.
|
|
12
|
+
|
|
13
|
+
Give each meaning one owner: Root/session policy for orchestration and judgment,
|
|
14
|
+
AGENTS.md for repository conventions, the specialist baseline for shared
|
|
15
|
+
boundaries, Role.task for task authority, and skills for conditional workflows
|
|
16
|
+
or tool knowledge. Generated projections derive from that owner. Metadata
|
|
17
|
+
selects the workflow; it does not duplicate its policy.
|
|
18
|
+
|
|
19
|
+
State the outcome, bounded authority, material constraints, completion evidence,
|
|
20
|
+
and escalation conditions. Preserve known facts needed to act; point to sources
|
|
21
|
+
for details the receiver can discover reliably. Routine safe in-scope choices
|
|
22
|
+
should proceed without questions. Carry authorized work through repair and proof.
|
|
23
|
+
|
|
24
|
+
Remove redundant policy, older-model scaffolding, broad reading rituals, rigid
|
|
25
|
+
recipes without a real dependency, hypothetical gates, and repeated testing.
|
|
26
|
+
Preserve lifecycle invariants and required checks. Use configuration for default
|
|
27
|
+
verbosity; use prompts for task-specific evidence and output requirements.
|
|
28
|
+
|
|
29
|
+
Keep skill descriptions short and situation-first. Audit triggers alongside
|
|
30
|
+
nearby skills; avoid skills that merely restate a task contract. Keep coherent
|
|
31
|
+
shared guidance together and link uncommon branch-specific mechanics only from
|
|
32
|
+
the condition that needs them. Metadata default prompts invoke the named skill
|
|
33
|
+
without embedding another instruction source. Preserve upstream attribution.
|
|
34
|
+
|
|
35
|
+
Validate the effective projection, not exact prose: the receiver can act within
|
|
36
|
+
its authority, recognize completion and blockers, and return sufficient evidence
|
|
37
|
+
without contradictory rules. Reuse the canonical testing policy.
|
|
@@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
|
|
|
1
1
|
interface:
|
|
2
2
|
display_name: "Writing instructions"
|
|
3
3
|
short_description: "Author and review model-facing instructions."
|
|
4
|
-
default_prompt: "Use writing-instructions for this
|
|
4
|
+
default_prompt: "Use $writing-instructions for this task."
|
|
5
5
|
policy:
|
|
6
6
|
allow_implicit_invocation: true
|