helloagents 1.0.0 → 2.2.7

This diff represents the content of publicly available package versions that have been released to one of the supported registries. The information contained in this diff is provided for informational purposes only and reflects changes between package versions as they appear in their respective public registries.
Files changed (38) hide show
  1. package/LICENSE.md +51 -0
  2. package/README.md +440 -840
  3. package/bin/cli.mjs +106 -0
  4. package/package.json +23 -38
  5. package/Claude/Skills/CN/CLAUDE.md +0 -998
  6. package/Claude/Skills/CN/skills/helloagents/analyze/SKILL.md +0 -187
  7. package/Claude/Skills/CN/skills/helloagents/design/SKILL.md +0 -261
  8. package/Claude/Skills/CN/skills/helloagents/develop/SKILL.md +0 -352
  9. package/Claude/Skills/CN/skills/helloagents/kb/SKILL.md +0 -249
  10. package/Claude/Skills/CN/skills/helloagents/templates/SKILL.md +0 -451
  11. package/Claude/Skills/EN/CLAUDE.md +0 -998
  12. package/Claude/Skills/EN/skills/helloagents/analyze/SKILL.md +0 -187
  13. package/Claude/Skills/EN/skills/helloagents/design/SKILL.md +0 -261
  14. package/Claude/Skills/EN/skills/helloagents/develop/SKILL.md +0 -352
  15. package/Claude/Skills/EN/skills/helloagents/kb/SKILL.md +0 -249
  16. package/Claude/Skills/EN/skills/helloagents/templates/SKILL.md +0 -451
  17. package/Codex/Skills/CN/AGENTS.md +0 -998
  18. package/Codex/Skills/CN/skills/helloagents/analyze/SKILL.md +0 -187
  19. package/Codex/Skills/CN/skills/helloagents/design/SKILL.md +0 -261
  20. package/Codex/Skills/CN/skills/helloagents/develop/SKILL.md +0 -352
  21. package/Codex/Skills/CN/skills/helloagents/kb/SKILL.md +0 -249
  22. package/Codex/Skills/CN/skills/helloagents/templates/SKILL.md +0 -451
  23. package/Codex/Skills/EN/AGENTS.md +0 -998
  24. package/Codex/Skills/EN/skills/helloagents/analyze/SKILL.md +0 -187
  25. package/Codex/Skills/EN/skills/helloagents/design/SKILL.md +0 -261
  26. package/Codex/Skills/EN/skills/helloagents/develop/SKILL.md +0 -352
  27. package/Codex/Skills/EN/skills/helloagents/kb/SKILL.md +0 -249
  28. package/Codex/Skills/EN/skills/helloagents/templates/SKILL.md +0 -451
  29. package/bin/cli.js +0 -85
  30. package/lib/args.js +0 -106
  31. package/lib/backup.js +0 -81
  32. package/lib/conflict.js +0 -118
  33. package/lib/copy.js +0 -125
  34. package/lib/defaults.js +0 -47
  35. package/lib/index.js +0 -297
  36. package/lib/output.js +0 -220
  37. package/lib/prompts.js +0 -173
  38. package/lib/utils.js +0 -225
@@ -1,352 +0,0 @@
1
- ---
2
- name: develop
3
- description: Development implementation phase detailed rules; read when entering development implementation; includes execution flow, code specifications, consistency audit, solution package migration
4
- ---
5
-
6
- # Development Implementation - Detailed Rules
7
-
8
- **Goal:** Execute code changes per task list in solution package, synchronize knowledge base updates, migrate to history/
9
-
10
- **Prerequisites:** Solution package exists in `plan/` directory awaiting execution
11
-
12
- **Backup Protection:** Recommend creating Git backup branch or manually backing up code directory before execution
13
-
14
- ---
15
-
16
- ## Mandatory Pre-entry Check
17
-
18
- <p3_entry_gate>
19
- **Description:** Even if routing determines entering development implementation, this check still verifies legitimacy (double insurance)
20
-
21
- **Sole Legal Conditions for Development Implementation (meet any):**
22
-
23
- ```yaml
24
- Condition A - Confirmation after solution design complete:
25
- Verification method: Previous AI output in conversation history was solution design complete AND current user input is explicit confirmation
26
-
27
- Condition B - Full authorization command:
28
- Verification method: MODE_FULL_AUTH status=true
29
-
30
- Condition C - Execution command:
31
- Verification method: MODE_EXECUTION status=true
32
- ```
33
-
34
- **Verification Failure Handling:**
35
- ```
36
- IF doesn't meet any condition:
37
- Output: "❌ Routing Error: Entering development implementation requires meeting prerequisites. Current conditions not met, re-routed."
38
- Execute: Re-determine current user message per routing priority
39
- Terminate: Development implementation flow
40
- ```
41
- </p3_entry_gate>
42
-
43
- ---
44
-
45
- ## Execution Steps
46
-
47
- **Important:** All file operations follow G5 silent execution specification
48
-
49
- ### Step 1: Determine Solution Package to Execute
50
-
51
- ```yaml
52
- Full authorization command (MODE_FULL_AUTH=true):
53
- - Read CREATED_PACKAGE variable (solution package path set during solution design phase)
54
- - Check if solution package exists and is complete
55
- - Exists and complete → Use this solution package, set CURRENT_PACKAGE = CREATED_PACKAGE
56
- - Doesn't exist or incomplete → Output error format per G6.2 and stop
57
- - Ignore other legacy solution packages in plan/
58
-
59
- Interactive confirmation mode/Execution command (MODE_EXECUTION=true):
60
- - Scan all solution packages under plan/ directory
61
- - No solution package exists → Output error format per G6.2 and stop
62
- - Solution package incomplete → Output error format per G6.2 and stop
63
- - Single complete solution package → Set CURRENT_PACKAGE, continue execution
64
- - Multiple solution packages → List inventory, wait for user selection
65
- - User enters valid number (1-N) → Set CURRENT_PACKAGE, continue execution
66
- - User enters cancel/refuse → Output cancellation format per G6.2, flow terminates
67
- - Invalid input → Ask again
68
-
69
- Exception output examples:
70
- Solution package doesn't exist:
71
- ```
72
- ❌【HelloAGENTS】- Execution Error
73
-
74
- Error: No executable solution package found
75
- - Cause: plan/ directory is empty or doesn't exist
76
-
77
- ────
78
- 🔄 Next Steps: Please create solution using ~plan command first, or enter solution design phase
79
- ```
80
-
81
- Solution package incomplete:
82
- ```
83
- ❌【HelloAGENTS】- Execution Error
84
-
85
- Error: Solution package incomplete
86
- - Solution package: [solution package name]
87
- - Missing files: [why.md/how.md/task.md]
88
-
89
- ────
90
- 🔄 Next Steps: Please supplement missing files or recreate solution package
91
- ```
92
- ```
93
-
94
- ### Step 2: Check Knowledge Base Status and Handle
95
-
96
- Execution method:
97
- - Determine per G10 quick decision tree
98
- - If need to create/rebuild knowledge base → Read `kb` Skill to execute complete flow
99
-
100
- ### Step 3: Read Knowledge Base and Acquire Project Context
101
-
102
- Execution method:
103
- - Execute per G10 quick flow (check knowledge base first → scan codebase if insufficient)
104
- - If need detailed rules → Read `kb` Skill
105
-
106
- ### Step 4: Read Current Solution Package
107
-
108
- Read `plan/YYYYMMDDHHMM_<feature>/task.md` and `why.md`
109
-
110
- ### Step 5: Execute Code Changes Per Task List
111
-
112
- ```yaml
113
- Execution rules:
114
- - Strictly execute item by item per task.md
115
-
116
- Task success handling:
117
- - After each task executes successfully, immediately update status from [ ] to [√]
118
-
119
- Task skip handling (status update to [-]):
120
- - Prerequisite tasks this task depends on failed
121
- - Task conditions not met
122
- - Task already covered by other task implementations
123
-
124
- Task failure handling (status update to [X]):
125
- - Record error information (for adding notes before migration)
126
- - Continue executing subsequent tasks
127
- - After all tasks complete, if failures exist:
128
- - Interactive confirmation mode/Execution command: List failure inventory, ask user decision
129
- - User chooses continue → Continue subsequent steps
130
- - User chooses terminate → Output "Terminated development implementation", flow terminates
131
- - Full authorization command: List failed tasks in summary, clear MODE_FULL_AUTH status
132
-
133
- Code editing techniques:
134
- - Large file handling (≥2000 lines): Grep locate → Read(offset,limit) → Edit precise modification
135
- - Each Edit only modifies single function/class
136
- ```
137
-
138
- ### Step 6: Code Security Check
139
-
140
- Check content:
141
- - Unsafe patterns (eval, exec, SQL concatenation, etc.)
142
- - Hardcoded sensitive information
143
- - EHRB risk avoidance
144
-
145
- ### Step 7: Quality Check and Testing
146
-
147
- ```yaml
148
- Test execution: Run test tasks defined in task.md, or project's existing test suite
149
-
150
- Test failure handling rules (strictly enforce):
151
- ⛔ Blocking tests (core functionality):
152
- - Failure MUST immediately stop execution
153
- - Output critical error format
154
- - Wait for user explicit decision (fix/skip/terminate)
155
- - Prohibit auto-skip
156
-
157
- ⚠️ Warning tests (important functionality):
158
- - Mark in summary when failed
159
- - Continue executing subsequent steps
160
-
161
- ℹ️ Informational tests (secondary functionality):
162
- - Record in summary when failed
163
- - Continue executing subsequent steps
164
- ```
165
-
166
- **⛔Blocking Test Failure Output Format:**
167
- ```
168
- ❌【HelloAGENTS】- Blocking Test Failure
169
-
170
- ⛔ Core functionality test failed, must handle before continuing:
171
- - Failed test: [test name]
172
- - Error message: [error summary]
173
-
174
- [1] Fix and retry - Attempt to fix issue then retest
175
- [2] Skip and continue - At your own risk, ignore this error and continue execution
176
- [3] Terminate execution - Stop development implementation
177
-
178
- ────
179
- 🔄 Next Steps: Please enter number to choose
180
- ```
181
-
182
- ### Step 8: Synchronize Update Knowledge Base
183
-
184
- **Important:** MUST complete solution package content reading before step 12 migrates solution package
185
-
186
- Execution method: Read `kb` Skill to execute complete knowledge base synchronization rules
187
-
188
- ### Step 9: Update CHANGELOG.md
189
-
190
- Determine version number per G7 version management rules
191
-
192
- ### Step 10: Consistency Audit
193
-
194
- <consistency_audit>
195
- **Audit Timing:** Execute immediately after P3 phase completes knowledge base operations
196
-
197
- **Audit Content:**
198
- 1. **Completeness**: Documentation covers all modules, essential files and charts complete
199
- 2. **Consistency**: APIs/data models consistent with code, no omissions, duplicates, dead links
200
-
201
- **Reality Priority (conflict resolution mechanism):**
202
- ```
203
- 1. Code is sole source of execution reality (Ground Truth)
204
- → Runtime behavior, API signatures, data structures based on code
205
-
206
- 2. Default correction direction: Correct knowledge base to conform to code
207
- → When inconsistency discovered, MUST update documentation to reflect code's objective facts
208
-
209
- 3. Exceptions (correct code):
210
- - Knowledge base is recent P2/P3 solution package (just designed solution)
211
- - Code has obvious errors (Bug)
212
- - Error information points to code issue
213
-
214
- 4. When in doubt: Bidirectional verification, prioritize trusting most recent code changes
215
- ```
216
- </consistency_audit>
217
-
218
- ### Step 11: Code Quality Check (Optional)
219
-
220
- ```yaml
221
- Execution content: Analyze code files, identify quality issues
222
-
223
- If issues found:
224
- Interactive confirmation mode:
225
- - Output optimization suggestion inquiry format
226
- - User confirms → Execute optimization, update documentation, retest
227
- - User refuses → Skip optimization, continue subsequent steps
228
- Full authorization command/Execution command:
229
- - List suggestions in summary (don't execute)
230
-
231
- Commit association: Execute per project specifications if commit needed
232
- ```
233
-
234
- **Code Quality Optimization Suggestion Inquiry Format:**
235
- ```
236
- ❓【HelloAGENTS】- Code Quality
237
-
238
- Found following optimizable items:
239
- 1. [Optimization suggestion 1] - [Impact scope/files]
240
- 2. [Optimization suggestion 2] - [Impact scope/files]
241
-
242
- [1] Execute optimization - Apply above optimization suggestions
243
- [2] Skip - Keep current state, continue subsequent steps
244
-
245
- ────
246
- 🔄 Next Steps: Please enter number to choose
247
- ```
248
-
249
- ### Step 12: Migrate Executed Solution Package to history/
250
-
251
- <plan_migration>
252
-
253
- ⚠️ **CRITICAL - Mandatory Enforcement Rules:**
254
-
255
- **Cannot skip:** This step is atomic operation at end of this phase
256
-
257
- **Execution Rules:**
258
-
259
- 1. Update task.md task status and notes:
260
- - All tasks update to actual execution results ([√]/[X]/[-]/[?])
261
- - Add notes below non-[√] status tasks (format: `> Note: [reason]`)
262
- - If multiple failed/skipped tasks, can add execution summary section at end
263
-
264
- 2. Migrate to history directory:
265
- - Move solution package directory from plan/ to under history/YYYY-MM/
266
- - YYYY-MM extracted from solution package directory name (e.g., 202511201200_xxx → 2025-11)
267
- - Complete path after migration: history/YYYY-MM/YYYYMMDDHHMM_<feature>/
268
- - Migration operation automatically deletes source directory under plan/
269
- - Name conflict handling: Force overwrite old solution package in history/
270
-
271
- 3. Update history index: `history/index.md`
272
-
273
- **Warning:** This operation will invalidate source file paths under plan/, ensure step 8 has completed content reading
274
- **Cannot skip:** This step is atomic operation at end of this phase
275
- </plan_migration>
276
-
277
- ---
278
-
279
- ## Code Specification Requirements
280
-
281
- <code_standards>
282
- **Applicable Scope:** All code changes in P3 phase
283
-
284
- **Specification Requirements:**
285
- - **File top comments:** Before import statements, project's existing comment style, 1-3 sentences explaining module purpose
286
- - **All code comments:** MUST be generated in {OUTPUT_LANGUAGE}
287
- - **Code style:** Follow project's existing naming conventions and format specifications
288
- </code_standards>
289
-
290
- ---
291
-
292
- ## Development Implementation Output Format
293
-
294
- ⚠️ **CRITICAL - Mandatory Requirements:**
295
- - ALWAYS use G6.1 unified output format
296
- - NEVER use free text to replace standard format
297
- - MUST verify format completeness before output
298
-
299
- ### When Waiting for User to Select Solution Package (step 1 multiple solution packages)
300
-
301
- ```
302
- ❓【HelloAGENTS】- Development Implementation
303
-
304
- Detected multiple solution packages, please select execution target:
305
-
306
- [1] YYYYMMDDHHMM_<feature1> - [Overview description]
307
- [2] YYYYMMDDHHMM_<feature2> - [Overview description]
308
- [3] YYYYMMDDHHMM_<feature3> - [Overview description]
309
-
310
- ────
311
- 🔄 Next Steps: Please enter solution package number (1/2/3)
312
- ```
313
-
314
- ### When Phase Complete
315
-
316
- Strictly call G6.1 unified output format, fill following data:
317
-
318
- 1. **Phase Name:** `Development Implementation`
319
- 2. **Phase Specific Content (≤5 key points):**
320
- - 📚 Knowledge base status
321
- - ✅ Execution result: Task count and status statistics
322
- - 🔍 Quality verification: Consistency audit, test results
323
- - 💡 Code quality optimization suggestions (if any)
324
- - 📦 Migration info: Migrated to `history/YYYY-MM/YYYYMMDDHHMM_<feature>/`
325
- 3. **File Change List:**
326
- ```
327
- 📁 Changes:
328
- - {code files}
329
- - {knowledge base files}
330
- - helloagents/CHANGELOG.md
331
- - helloagents/history/index.md
332
- ...
333
- ```
334
- 4. **Next Step Suggestions:** "Please confirm if implementation results meet expectations?"
335
- 5. **Legacy Solution Reminder:** Scan plan/ directory per G11, display if legacy solution packages exist
336
-
337
- ---
338
-
339
- ## Phase Transition Rules
340
-
341
- ```yaml
342
- After completing all actions:
343
- Interactive confirmation mode: Output summary → Development implementation ends
344
- Full authorization command: Output overall summary → Flow ends
345
- Execution command: Output overall summary → Flow ends
346
- Variable cleanup: CURRENT_PACKAGE will automatically clean during legacy solution scan (per G11 rules)
347
-
348
- Exceptional situations (test failures/user raises issues):
349
- Interactive confirmation mode: Mark in output, wait for user decision
350
- Full authorization command/Execution command: Mark test failure in summary, flow ends normally
351
- Subsequent user messages handled per routing priority
352
- ```
@@ -1,249 +0,0 @@
1
- ---
2
- name: kb
3
- description: Complete knowledge base management rules; read when ~init command or knowledge base missing; includes creation, synchronization, audit, context acquisition rules
4
- ---
5
-
6
- # Knowledge Base Management - Complete Rules
7
-
8
- ## Knowledge Base Architecture
9
-
10
- **File Structure:**
11
- ```plaintext
12
- helloagents/ # HelloAGENTS workspace (SSOT)
13
- ├── CHANGELOG.md # Version history (Keep a Changelog)
14
- ├── project.md # Technical conventions
15
- ├── wiki/ # Core documentation
16
- │ ├── overview.md # Project overview
17
- │ ├── arch.md # Architecture design
18
- │ ├── api.md # API manual
19
- │ ├── data.md # Data models
20
- │ └── modules/<module>.md
21
- ├── plan/ # Change workspace
22
- │ └── YYYYMMDDHHMM_<feature>/
23
- │ ├── why.md # Change proposal
24
- │ ├── how.md # Technical design
25
- │ └── task.md # Task list
26
- └── history/ # Completed changes archive
27
- ├── index.md
28
- └── YYYY-MM/YYYYMMDDHHMM_<feature>/
29
- ```
30
-
31
- **Path Conventions:**
32
- - In this ruleset, `plan/`, `wiki/`, `history/` all refer to complete paths under `helloagents/`
33
- - All knowledge base files MUST be created under the `helloagents/` directory
34
-
35
- ---
36
-
37
- ## Core Terminology Details
38
-
39
- - **SSOT** (Single Source of Truth): Single source of truth (knowledge level), refers to knowledge base
40
- - *Note:* When SSOT conflicts with code, SSOT is considered "outdated" and needs updating based on code (execution facts)
41
- - **Knowledge Base**: Complete project documentation collection (`CHANGELOG.md`, `project.md`, `wiki/*`)
42
- - **EHRB** (Extreme High-Risk Behavior): Extreme high-risk behavior
43
- - **ADR** (Architecture Decision Record): Architecture decision record
44
- - **MRE** (Minimal Reproducible Example): Minimal reproducible example
45
- - **Solution Package**: Complete solution unit
46
- - **Directory structure**: `YYYYMMDDHHMM_<feature>/`
47
- - **Required files**: `why.md` + `how.md` + `task.md`
48
- - **Completeness check**: Required files exist, non-empty, task.md has at least 1 task item
49
-
50
- ---
51
-
52
- ## Quality Check Dimensions
53
-
54
- 1. **Completeness**: Whether required files and sections exist
55
- 2. **Format**: Whether Mermaid charts/Markdown format is correct
56
- 3. **Consistency**: Whether API signatures/data models consistent with code
57
- 4. **Security**: Whether contains sensitive information (keys/PII)
58
-
59
- **Issue Grading:**
60
- - **Minor** (can continue): Missing non-critical files, non-standard format, outdated descriptions
61
- - **Severe** (needs handling): Core files missing, seriously out of sync (>30%), contains sensitive information
62
-
63
- ---
64
-
65
- ## Project Context Acquisition Strategy
66
-
67
- <context_acquisition_rules>
68
- **Step 1: Check knowledge base first (if exists)**
69
- - Core files: `project.md`, `wiki/overview.md`, `wiki/arch.md`
70
- - Select as needed: `wiki/modules/<module>.md`, `wiki/api.md`, `wiki/data.md`
71
-
72
- **Step 2: Knowledge base doesn't exist/insufficient info → Comprehensive codebase scan**
73
- - Use Glob to get file structure
74
- - Use Grep to search key information
75
- - Acquire: Architecture, tech stack, module structure, technical constraints
76
- </context_acquisition_rules>
77
-
78
- ---
79
-
80
- ## Knowledge Base Synchronization Rules
81
-
82
- <kb_sync_rules>
83
- **Trigger Timing:** After code changes, MUST immediately synchronize knowledge base updates
84
-
85
- **Step 1 - Module Specification Update:**
86
- - Read current solution package `plan/YYYYMMDDHHMM_<feature>/why.md` **Core Scenarios** section (read before migration)
87
- - Extract requirements and scenarios (requirements need to mark owning module)
88
- - Update `wiki/modules/<module>.md` **Specifications** section
89
- - Does not exist → Append
90
- - Already exists → Update
91
-
92
- **Step 2 - Update by Change Type:**
93
- - API changes → Update `wiki/api.md`
94
- - Data model changes → Update `wiki/data.md`
95
- - Architecture changes/new modules → Update `wiki/arch.md`
96
- - Module index changes → Update `wiki/overview.md`
97
- - Technical convention changes → Update `project.md`
98
-
99
- **Step 3 - ADR Maintenance (if includes architecture decisions):**
100
- - Extract ADR information (read from `plan/YYYYMMDDHHMM_<feature>/how.md` **Architecture Decision ADR** section before migration)
101
- - Append to **Major Architecture Decisions** table in `wiki/arch.md`
102
- - Link to `history/YYYY-MM/YYYYMMDDHHMM_<feature>/how.md#adr-xxx`
103
- - **Note:** The history/ link written at this time is a pre-calculated path
104
-
105
- **Step 4 - Cleanup:**
106
- - Delete outdated information, deprecated APIs, removed modules
107
-
108
- **Step 5 - Defect Retrospective (fix scenario specific):**
109
- - Add "Known Issues" or "Notes" in module documentation
110
- - Record root cause, fix solution, prevention measures
111
- </kb_sync_rules>
112
-
113
- ---
114
-
115
- ## Knowledge Base Missing Handling
116
-
117
- <kb_missing_handler>
118
- **STEP 1: Check if core files exist**
119
- - `CHANGELOG.md`, `project.md`, `wiki/*.md`
120
-
121
- **STEP 2: Knowledge base does not exist**
122
- Handle by phase:
123
- ```yaml
124
- Requirements Analysis Phase:
125
- - Only flag issue, don't create knowledge base
126
- - Prompt in summary "Knowledge base missing, recommend executing ~init command first"
127
-
128
- Solution Design/Development Implementation Phase:
129
- - Comprehensively scan codebase and create complete knowledge base:
130
- - Root directory: CHANGELOG.md, project.md
131
- - wiki/: overview.md, arch.md, api.md, data.md
132
- - wiki/modules/: <module>.md (each module)
133
- - Large projects (determined per G4) batch process (≤20 modules per batch)
134
- ```
135
-
136
- **STEP 3: Knowledge base exists**
137
- ```yaml
138
- Execute quality pre-check:
139
- Severe issues → Comprehensively scan and rebuild (Solution Design/Development Implementation phase)
140
- Minor issues → Continue flow
141
- ```
142
- </kb_missing_handler>
143
-
144
- ---
145
-
146
- ## Legacy Solution Handling
147
-
148
- ### User Selection Migration Flow
149
-
150
- <legacy_plan_migration>
151
- **Applicable Scenario:** Batch processing flow after user responds "confirm migration"
152
-
153
- **Step 1 - User selects migration scope:**
154
-
155
- List all legacy solution packages, ask user to choose:
156
- ```
157
- Detected X legacy solution packages, please select migration method:
158
- - Enter "all" → Migrate all legacy solution packages
159
- - Enter solution package numbers (e.g., 1, 1,3, 1-3) → Migrate specified solution packages
160
- - Enter "cancel" → Keep all legacy solution packages
161
-
162
- Solution package list:
163
- [1] 202511201300_logout
164
- [2] 202511201400_profile
165
- [3] 202511201500_settings
166
- ```
167
-
168
- **User Response Handling:**
169
- - "all" → Migrate all
170
- - Single number (e.g., 1) → Migrate 1st
171
- - Multiple numbers (e.g., 1,3) → Migrate specified
172
- - Number range (e.g., 1-3) → Migrate 1st to 3rd
173
- - "cancel" → Keep all
174
- - Other input → Ask again
175
-
176
- **Step 2 - Migrate selected solution packages one by one:**
177
-
178
- ```yaml
179
- for each selected solution package:
180
- 1. Update task status: All task statuses update to [-]
181
- Add at top: > **Status:** Not executed (user cleanup)
182
-
183
- 2. Migrate to history directory:
184
- - Move from plan/ to history/YYYY-MM/
185
- - YYYY-MM extracted from solution package directory name
186
- - Name conflict: Force overwrite
187
-
188
- 3. Update history index: history/index.md (mark "not executed")
189
- ```
190
-
191
- **Step 3 - Output migration summary:**
192
- ```
193
- ✅ Migrated X solution packages to history/:
194
- - 202511201300_logout → history/2025-11/202511201300_logout/
195
- - 202511201500_settings → history/2025-11/202511201500_settings/
196
- 📦 Remaining Y solution packages kept in plan/:
197
- - 202511201400_profile
198
- ```
199
- </legacy_plan_migration>
200
-
201
- ### Legacy Solution Scan and Reminder Mechanism
202
-
203
- <legacy_plan_scan>
204
- **Trigger Timing:**
205
- - After solution package creation: Solution Design complete, Planning command complete, Lightweight iteration complete
206
- - After solution package migration: Development Implementation complete, Execution command complete, Full authorization command complete
207
-
208
- **Scan Logic:**
209
- 1. Scan all solution package directories under plan/ directory
210
- 2. Exclude solution package executed this time (read CURRENT_PACKAGE variable)
211
- 3. Clear CURRENT_PACKAGE variable
212
- 4. Remaining solution packages are legacy solutions
213
-
214
- **Output Position:** Auto-inject to end slot of G6.1 output format
215
-
216
- **Output Format:**
217
- ```
218
- 📦 plan/Legacy Solutions: Detected X legacy solution packages ([list]), do you need to migrate to history?
219
- ```
220
-
221
- List format: YYYYMMDDHHMM_<feature> (one per line, max 5, show "...and X more" if exceeds)
222
-
223
- **User Response:**
224
- - Confirm migration → Execute batch migration flow
225
- - Refuse/ignore → Keep in plan/ directory
226
- </legacy_plan_scan>
227
-
228
- ---
229
-
230
- ## ~init / ~wiki Command Completion Summary Format
231
-
232
- Strictly follow G6.1 unified output format:
233
-
234
- ```
235
- ✅【HelloAGENTS】- Knowledge Base Command Complete
236
-
237
- - 📚 Knowledge base status: [Created/Updated/Rebuilt]
238
- - 📊 Operation summary: Scanned X modules, created/updated Y documents
239
- - 🔍 Quality check: [Check results, if issues exist]
240
-
241
- ────
242
- 📁 Changes:
243
- - {knowledge base files}
244
- - helloagents/CHANGELOG.md
245
- - helloagents/project.md
246
- ...
247
-
248
- 🔄 Next Steps: Knowledge base operation complete, can proceed with other tasks
249
- ```