gsdd-cli 0.2.0 → 0.16.1
This diff represents the content of publicly available package versions that have been released to one of the supported registries. The information contained in this diff is provided for informational purposes only and reflects changes between package versions as they appear in their respective public registries.
- package/README.md +67 -34
- package/agents/DISTILLATION.md +15 -13
- package/agents/planner.md +2 -0
- package/bin/adapters/agents.mjs +1 -0
- package/bin/adapters/claude.mjs +12 -3
- package/bin/adapters/codex.mjs +4 -0
- package/bin/adapters/opencode.mjs +13 -4
- package/bin/gsdd.mjs +64 -39
- package/bin/lib/cli-utils.mjs +1 -1
- package/bin/lib/file-ops.mjs +161 -0
- package/bin/lib/health-truth.mjs +188 -0
- package/bin/lib/health.mjs +65 -12
- package/bin/lib/init-flow.mjs +267 -0
- package/bin/lib/init-prompts.mjs +247 -0
- package/bin/lib/init-runtime.mjs +226 -0
- package/bin/lib/init.mjs +19 -378
- package/bin/lib/models.mjs +19 -4
- package/bin/lib/phase.mjs +100 -14
- package/bin/lib/plan-constants.mjs +30 -0
- package/bin/lib/provenance.mjs +146 -0
- package/bin/lib/templates.mjs +17 -0
- package/distilled/DESIGN.md +625 -41
- package/distilled/EVIDENCE-INDEX.md +297 -0
- package/distilled/README.md +49 -21
- package/distilled/SKILL.md +89 -85
- package/distilled/templates/agents.block.md +13 -82
- package/distilled/templates/agents.md +0 -7
- package/distilled/templates/delegates/plan-checker.md +11 -4
- package/distilled/workflows/audit-milestone.md +7 -5
- package/distilled/workflows/complete-milestone.md +297 -0
- package/distilled/workflows/execute.md +188 -19
- package/distilled/workflows/map-codebase.md +14 -7
- package/distilled/workflows/new-milestone.md +249 -0
- package/distilled/workflows/new-project.md +28 -24
- package/distilled/workflows/pause.md +42 -6
- package/distilled/workflows/plan-milestone-gaps.md +183 -0
- package/distilled/workflows/plan.md +78 -13
- package/distilled/workflows/progress.md +42 -19
- package/distilled/workflows/quick.md +171 -8
- package/distilled/workflows/resume.md +121 -11
- package/distilled/workflows/verify-work.md +260 -0
- package/distilled/workflows/verify.md +124 -33
- package/package.json +9 -7
|
@@ -0,0 +1,297 @@
|
|
|
1
|
+
# GSDD Evidence Index
|
|
2
|
+
|
|
3
|
+
> One-line-per-source mapping of every design decision to its primary evidence.
|
|
4
|
+
> Extracted from inline **Evidence** sections in `distilled/DESIGN.md`.
|
|
5
|
+
> Updated when a decision is added or revised.
|
|
6
|
+
> Guarded by G31 in `tests/gsdd.guards.test.cjs`.
|
|
7
|
+
|
|
8
|
+
---
|
|
9
|
+
|
|
10
|
+
## D1 — 4-File Codebase Standard
|
|
11
|
+
- `agents/_archive/gsd-codebase-mapper.md` lines 72-79 (GSD 7-file model)
|
|
12
|
+
- `agents/mapper.md` (GSDD 4-file standard)
|
|
13
|
+
- `.planning/SPEC.md` "Lean Context Decision" section
|
|
14
|
+
- Liu et al. "Lost in the Middle: How Language Models Use Long Contexts" (NeurIPS 2023) — position-dependent recall supports minimal stable context footprint
|
|
15
|
+
- Levy et al. "Same Task, More Tokens: Impact of Input Length on the Reasoning Performance of LLMs" (EMNLP 2024) — longer inputs degrade reasoning performance
|
|
16
|
+
- Aider tree-sitter dynamic repo maps (aider.chat) — on-demand structural mapping as an alternative to static context files
|
|
17
|
+
|
|
18
|
+
## D2 — Agent Consolidation: 11 to 10
|
|
19
|
+
- `agents/_archive/` (11 original GSD files, git history via `git mv`)
|
|
20
|
+
- `agents/` + `agents/README.md` (10 canonicals, lifecycle table)
|
|
21
|
+
- `agents/README.md` lifecycle table (canonical-to-GSD source mapping)
|
|
22
|
+
- CrewAI role-based team patterns, Microsoft AutoGen hierarchical agents, LangGraph multi-agent subgraphs (validate role specialization; specific count of 10 is engineering judgment)
|
|
23
|
+
|
|
24
|
+
## D3 — Two-Layer Architecture: Roles and Delegates
|
|
25
|
+
- `agents/README.md` (Two-Layer Architecture and Runtime Distribution sections)
|
|
26
|
+
- `bin/gsdd.mjs` lines 84-102 (role copy step with existsSync guard)
|
|
27
|
+
- `tests/gsdd.init.test.cjs` (role file existence and delegate-role reference validation)
|
|
28
|
+
- All 10 delegate files in `distilled/templates/delegates/`
|
|
29
|
+
- Jensen & Meckling "Theory of the Firm" (Journal of Financial Economics 1976) — principal-agent delegation contracts
|
|
30
|
+
- Gamma et al. GoF Strategy Pattern ("Design Patterns" 1994) — separating algorithm definition from usage context
|
|
31
|
+
- LangGraph multi-agent subgraphs + Microsoft AutoGen hierarchical agents (production validation of two-layer separation)
|
|
32
|
+
|
|
33
|
+
## D4 — Zero-Hop Security Propagation
|
|
34
|
+
- `agents/mapper.md` lines 66-90 (Forbidden Files section + Hard stop)
|
|
35
|
+
- `agents/_archive/gsd-codebase-mapper.md` lines 66-97 (original narrower rules)
|
|
36
|
+
- PR 2 intermediate state (one-hop via SKILL.md cross-reference)
|
|
37
|
+
- PR 4 final state (zero-hop, role contains all rules)
|
|
38
|
+
- OWASP Top 10 for LLM Applications v2.0 (2025) — LLM01 (Prompt Injection) + LLM07 (System Prompt Leakage) support embedding security rules at the role-contract level
|
|
39
|
+
- Greshake et al. "Not What You've Signed Up For" (IEEE S&P 2023) — indirect prompt injection validates defense-in-depth at the agent-contract layer
|
|
40
|
+
- Saltzer & Schroeder "Protection of Information in Computer Systems" (1975) — complete mediation principle
|
|
41
|
+
|
|
42
|
+
## D5 — Conditional Synthesizer
|
|
43
|
+
- `get-shit-done/workflows/new-project.md` lines 708-729 (GSD always-spawn synthesizer)
|
|
44
|
+
- `distilled/templates/delegates/researcher-synthesizer.md`
|
|
45
|
+
- `agents/synthesizer.md` (cross-reference algorithm)
|
|
46
|
+
- `.planning/config.json` `researchDepth` field contract
|
|
47
|
+
- LangGraph conditional edges — adaptive agent invocation based on workflow state
|
|
48
|
+
- Asai et al. "Self-RAG: Learning to Retrieve, Generate, and Critique through Self-Reflection" (ICLR 2024) — conditional retrieval/synthesis based on need
|
|
49
|
+
- Anthropic "Building effective agents" (Dec 2024) — routing workflows match task complexity to agent selection
|
|
50
|
+
|
|
51
|
+
## D6 — Mapper Staleness: Standalone Workflow
|
|
52
|
+
- `get-shit-done/workflows/map-codebase.md` lines 35-62 (GSD staleness check with 3 options)
|
|
53
|
+
- `get-shit-done/workflows/new-project.md` lines 61-80 (brownfield offer delegates to map-codebase)
|
|
54
|
+
- `distilled/workflows/map-codebase.md` (standalone, re-runnable)
|
|
55
|
+
- `distilled/workflows/new-project.md` (auto-invoke for brownfield via skill reference)
|
|
56
|
+
- Aider (aider.chat) — dynamic tree-sitter-based repo maps generated on-demand (validates freshness-over-cache approach)
|
|
57
|
+
- Cursor — continuous background indexing (cached approach; shows both are production-valid tradeoffs)
|
|
58
|
+
|
|
59
|
+
## D7 — Milestone Hierarchy and Phase Continuation
|
|
60
|
+
- `get-shit-done/workflows/new-milestone.md` lines 101-173 (milestone-aware researchers)
|
|
61
|
+
- `get-shit-done/workflows/new-milestone.md` line 269 (phase numbering continuation)
|
|
62
|
+
- `distilled/README.md` lifecycle diagram
|
|
63
|
+
- `.planning/SPEC.md` "Long-Term Lifecycle" section
|
|
64
|
+
- Erol, Hendler & Nau / Nau et al. Hierarchical Task Networks (JAIR 2003) — foundational milestone→phase→task decomposition in AI planning
|
|
65
|
+
- PMI PMBOK Work Breakdown Structure (WBS) standard — industry-standard phase/task hierarchy
|
|
66
|
+
- Khot et al. "Decomposed Prompting" (ICLR 2023) — task decomposition improves LLM performance on multi-step work
|
|
67
|
+
|
|
68
|
+
## D8 — Advisory Git Protocol
|
|
69
|
+
- `agents/_archive/gsd-executor.md` (mandatory commit in algorithm, TDD flow)
|
|
70
|
+
- `agents/executor.md` lines 57-64 (Git Guidance — repo-native, advisory)
|
|
71
|
+
- Industry consensus: Aider, GitHub Copilot, Cursor, Codex CLI, OpenCode — all treat git as advisory/user-configured; no major AI coding tool enforces a specific commit or branch convention
|
|
72
|
+
|
|
73
|
+
## D9 — Adapter Generation Over Conversion
|
|
74
|
+
- `get-shit-done/install.js` (GSD converter with per-runtime conversion logic)
|
|
75
|
+
- `get-shit-done/workflows/new-project.md` (851 lines, 10+ AskUserQuestion calls, 7 Task() calls)
|
|
76
|
+
- `bin/gsdd.mjs` (thin CLI entrypoint and adapter dispatcher)
|
|
77
|
+
- `bin/adapters/` (vendor-specific adapter generation)
|
|
78
|
+
- `distilled/templates/delegates/plan-checker.md` (single payload source for native checker generation)
|
|
79
|
+
- `.planning/SPEC.md` "Agent Integration Strategy" section
|
|
80
|
+
- AGENTS.md Linux Foundation standard: agents.md
|
|
81
|
+
|
|
82
|
+
## D10 — Context Isolation: Summaries Up, Documents to Disk
|
|
83
|
+
- `get-shit-done/workflows/new-project.md` lines 544-706 (4 researchers write to files, return summaries)
|
|
84
|
+
- All 9 delegate files (return format instructions)
|
|
85
|
+
- `agents/synthesizer.md` (reads full research files from disk)
|
|
86
|
+
- Anthropic Agent Teams (Feb 2026): "Shared State, Not Shared Context"
|
|
87
|
+
- AI21 Modular Intelligence (Feb 2026): orchestrator-based designs prevent context drift
|
|
88
|
+
|
|
89
|
+
## D11 — Quick-Work Lane
|
|
90
|
+
- `get-shit-done/workflows/quick.md` (454 lines, two modes, STATE.md tracking)
|
|
91
|
+
- `distilled/workflows/quick.md` (~120 lines, single mode, LOG.md tracking)
|
|
92
|
+
- Crystal Clear (Cockburn 2004) — ceremony scales with team size and criticality; lightweight methods prescribed for small/low-criticality work
|
|
93
|
+
- Kanban class-of-service (Anderson 2010) — routing tasks by size/urgency to appropriate workflow lanes
|
|
94
|
+
- Anthropic "Building effective agents" (Dec 2024) — match workflow complexity to task complexity
|
|
95
|
+
|
|
96
|
+
## D12 — Session Persistence Without State File
|
|
97
|
+
- `get-shit-done/workflows/pause-work.md` (123 lines, phase-scoped checkpoint)
|
|
98
|
+
- `get-shit-done/workflows/resume-project.md` (307 lines, STATE.md-dependent)
|
|
99
|
+
- `get-shit-done/workflows/progress.md` (382 lines, gsd-tools.cjs-dependent)
|
|
100
|
+
- `distilled/workflows/pause.md`, `distilled/workflows/resume.md`, `distilled/workflows/progress.md`
|
|
101
|
+
- `.internal-research/gsd-distilled-audit-13th-march-2026.md` — Highest-ROI recommendation #3
|
|
102
|
+
|
|
103
|
+
## D13 — Mechanical Invariant Enforcement
|
|
104
|
+
- `tests/gsdd.invariants.test.cjs` lines 1015+ (6 suites, ~106 assertions)
|
|
105
|
+
- OpenAI Harness Engineering blog (Feb 2026): "error messages as enforcement mechanism"
|
|
106
|
+
- External audit (2026-03-13): recommendation #4 "Mechanize the framework's invariants"
|
|
107
|
+
- PRs #20-23: orphan `</output>` tags survived 4 manual review cycles before G4 caught them
|
|
108
|
+
|
|
109
|
+
## D14 — Headless Mode
|
|
110
|
+
- `get-shit-done/workflows/new-project.md` lines 9-40 (GSD headless predecessor)
|
|
111
|
+
- Claude Code: `-p` flag for headless execution (docs.anthropic.com)
|
|
112
|
+
- Codex CLI: `--quiet` and `--auto-edit` flags (developers.openai.com/codex/cli/reference)
|
|
113
|
+
- Cline CLI 2.0: explicit headless CI/CD mode (devops.com, 2025)
|
|
114
|
+
|
|
115
|
+
## D15 — Model Profile Propagation
|
|
116
|
+
- `get-shit-done/references/model-profiles.md` + `model-profile-resolution.md` (GSD reference)
|
|
117
|
+
- OpenSpec: portable spec core is tool-agnostic (openspec.dev)
|
|
118
|
+
- Claude Code: `model:` field with aliases (docs.anthropic.com/en/docs/claude-code/sub-agents)
|
|
119
|
+
- OpenCode: `model:` in agent frontmatter (opencode.ai/docs/agents)
|
|
120
|
+
- Agent Skills standard: no `model:` field in spec (agentskills.io/specification)
|
|
121
|
+
|
|
122
|
+
## D16 — Template Versioning via Generation Manifest
|
|
123
|
+
- `get-shit-done/install.js` lines 1227-1327 (SHA-256 manifest + backup directory)
|
|
124
|
+
- OpenSpec: managed blocks with bounded upsert (openspec.dev)
|
|
125
|
+
- Angular/Turborepo/Next.js: ordered migrations with dry-run preview
|
|
126
|
+
- Langfuse: generation/prompt versioning with hash-based change detection (langfuse.com/docs/prompts)
|
|
127
|
+
|
|
128
|
+
## D17 — CLI Composition Root Boundary
|
|
129
|
+
- `get-shit-done/install.js` (GSD monolithic install/conversion surface)
|
|
130
|
+
- `bin/gsdd.mjs`, `bin/lib/init.mjs`, `bin/lib/templates.mjs`, `bin/lib/models.mjs`
|
|
131
|
+
- `tests/gsdd.init.test.cjs`, `tests/gsdd.models.test.cjs`, `tests/gsdd.manifest.test.cjs`
|
|
132
|
+
- Seemann "Dependency Injection in .NET" (Manning 2011) — named "Composition Root" pattern
|
|
133
|
+
- Martin "Clean Architecture" (2017) — main component as the outermost wiring layer
|
|
134
|
+
- Standard pattern in oclif, Commander.js, yargs, Cobra CLIs
|
|
135
|
+
|
|
136
|
+
## D18 — Codex CLI Native Adapter
|
|
137
|
+
- OpenAI Codex CLI docs: developers.openai.com/codex/subagents
|
|
138
|
+
- Codex CLI v0.115.0 release notes: github.com/openai/codex/releases/tag/rust-v0.115.0
|
|
139
|
+
- Agent Skills standard: developers.openai.com/codex/skills
|
|
140
|
+
- `bin/adapters/codex.mjs` (implementation)
|
|
141
|
+
- Live validation fixtures (2026-03-17): 3 Codex test runs confirming happy path, revision, max-3 escalation
|
|
142
|
+
|
|
143
|
+
## D19 — Scenario-Based Eval Coverage
|
|
144
|
+
- OpenAI: "Testing Agent Skills Systematically with Evals" (developers.openai.com/blog/eval-skills)
|
|
145
|
+
- Anthropic: "Demystifying Evals for AI Agents" (anthropic.com/engineering/demystifying-evals-for-ai-agents)
|
|
146
|
+
- Block: "Testing Pyramid for AI Agents" (engineering.block.xyz/blog/testing-pyramid-for-ai-agents)
|
|
147
|
+
- `tests/gsdd.scenarios.test.cjs` (S1–S5, ~37 assertions)
|
|
148
|
+
|
|
149
|
+
## D20 — Workspace Health Diagnostics
|
|
150
|
+
- `get-shit-done/workflows/health.md` (157 lines, GSD predecessor)
|
|
151
|
+
- OpenAI Harness Engineering (Feb 2026): error messages as enforcement mechanism
|
|
152
|
+
- External audit (2026-03-13): recommendation #3 "Add just enough: status/resume/progress/health"
|
|
153
|
+
- `bin/lib/health.mjs`, `tests/gsdd.health.test.cjs`, `tests/gsdd.guards.test.cjs` (G14)
|
|
154
|
+
|
|
155
|
+
## D21 — OWASP Authorization Matrix
|
|
156
|
+
- OWASP Authorization Testing Automation Cheat Sheet: pivot-format matrix standard
|
|
157
|
+
- OWASP Top 10 for Agentic Applications 2026: A1 Agent Overreach, A4 Insufficient Authorization
|
|
158
|
+
- External audits (2026-03-13, 2026-03-17): independently flagged auth verification gap
|
|
159
|
+
- `distilled/templates/auth-matrix.md`, `agents/integration-checker.md` (Step 4a)
|
|
160
|
+
|
|
161
|
+
## D22 — Delegate Layer Architecture
|
|
162
|
+
- Anthropic multi-agent guidance: orchestration patterns with isolated sub-agents
|
|
163
|
+
- OpenAI Harness Engineering (2026): delegate pattern for reusable sub-agent behavior
|
|
164
|
+
- OpenDev "Terminal Agents" (arXiv 2603.05344): multi-agent coordination with explicit role contracts
|
|
165
|
+
- `distilled/templates/delegates/` (11 delegate files)
|
|
166
|
+
- `distilled/workflows/*.md` (`<delegate>` blocks)
|
|
167
|
+
|
|
168
|
+
## D23 — Mapper Output Quantification
|
|
169
|
+
- `ideas.md` (internal, Feb 2026): direct per-tool comparison — "84% declining > uses constructor injection"
|
|
170
|
+
- ArXiv 2602.20478 (Codified Context): structured quantifiable facts enable JIT context loading
|
|
171
|
+
- GetDX measurement framework (2026): adoption % as primary signal for convention strength
|
|
172
|
+
- Anthropic 2026 Agentic Coding Trends: context quality as primary competitive advantage
|
|
173
|
+
- `distilled/templates/codebase/conventions.md`, `distilled/templates/delegates/mapper-quality.md`
|
|
174
|
+
|
|
175
|
+
## D24 — Consumer Governance Completeness
|
|
176
|
+
- Anthropic "Effective harnesses for long-running agents" (2026): incomplete maps cause agent failure
|
|
177
|
+
- Agent Skills specification (agentskills.io): progressive disclosure requires complete top-level map
|
|
178
|
+
- HumanLayer "Skill Issue" (2026): AGENTS.md should be a complete capability map
|
|
179
|
+
- External audits (2026-03-13, 2026-03-17): documentation accuracy as top adoption blocker
|
|
180
|
+
- `distilled/templates/agents.block.md`, `tests/gsdd.guards.test.cjs` (G18)
|
|
181
|
+
|
|
182
|
+
## D25 — Consumer First-Run Experience
|
|
183
|
+
- Anthropic harness engineering (2025-2026): "honest constraints over vague prompting"
|
|
184
|
+
- OpenAI Codex skills documentation: clear per-platform invocation patterns
|
|
185
|
+
- Both GSDD external audits (2026-03-13, 2026-03-17): "architecture solid, presentation lags"
|
|
186
|
+
- `README.md`, `distilled/templates/agents.block.md`, `bin/lib/init.mjs`, `tests/gsdd.guards.test.cjs` (G19)
|
|
187
|
+
|
|
188
|
+
## D26 — Session Continuity Contract Hardening
|
|
189
|
+
- Anthropic "Effective harnesses for long-running agents" (2026): artifact-based session handoff
|
|
190
|
+
- GitHub "How to build reliable AI workflows with agentic primitives" (2026): session splitting
|
|
191
|
+
- OpenAI harness engineering (2026): incremental progress tracking is the key multi-session mechanism
|
|
192
|
+
- OpenDev terminal agents (arXiv 2603.05344): runtime state must be derivable from artifacts
|
|
193
|
+
- `distilled/workflows/pause.md`, `distilled/workflows/resume.md`, `distilled/workflows/progress.md`
|
|
194
|
+
- `tests/gsdd.guards.test.cjs` (G20)
|
|
195
|
+
|
|
196
|
+
## D27 — Consumer-Ready Surface Completion
|
|
197
|
+
- External audit (2026-03-13): "architecture solid, presentation lags implementation"
|
|
198
|
+
- External audit (2026-03-17): "consumer surface identified as #1 bottleneck"
|
|
199
|
+
- External audit (2026-03-18): "docs should close the consumer journey"
|
|
200
|
+
- `README.md` (6 new subsections), `tests/gsdd.guards.test.cjs` (G21)
|
|
201
|
+
|
|
202
|
+
## D28 — Workflow Completion Routing
|
|
203
|
+
- Consumer audit (2026-03-21): "agent never proactively suggested the next GSDD command"
|
|
204
|
+
- `get-shit-done/workflows/progress.md` (GSD "Next Up" block pattern)
|
|
205
|
+
- Anthropic "Building effective agents" (2025): explicit handoff points with clear next actions
|
|
206
|
+
- `distilled/workflows/*.md` (9 `<completion>` sections), `tests/gsdd.guards.test.cjs` (G22)
|
|
207
|
+
|
|
208
|
+
## D29 — Approach Exploration
|
|
209
|
+
- Anthropic "Building effective agents" (2025): sub-agents return condensed summaries
|
|
210
|
+
- LangChain "Context Engineering for Agents" (2025): Write/Select/Compress/Isolate patterns
|
|
211
|
+
- `get-shit-done/workflows/discuss-phase.md` (gray area identification, GSD source)
|
|
212
|
+
- `get-shit-done/workflows/list-phase-assumptions.md` (5-dimension assumption surfacing)
|
|
213
|
+
- `get-shit-done/workflows/discovery-phase.md` (3-level research workflow)
|
|
214
|
+
- `agents/approach-explorer.md`, `distilled/templates/delegates/approach-explorer.md`
|
|
215
|
+
|
|
216
|
+
## D30 — Hardening Propagation
|
|
217
|
+
- D28 consumer audit (2026-03-21): persistence failures at every workflow boundary
|
|
218
|
+
- Huang et al. "LLMs Cannot Self-Correct Reasoning Yet" (ICLR 2024): LLMs need external feedback
|
|
219
|
+
- Kamoi et al. "When Can LLMs Actually Correct Their Own Mistakes?" (TACL 2024): self-correction requires reliable external feedback
|
|
220
|
+
- Anthropic long-context research (2024): instructions at decision points followed more reliably
|
|
221
|
+
- `distilled/workflows/quick.md`, `distilled/workflows/map-codebase.md`, `tests/gsdd.guards.test.cjs` (G24)
|
|
222
|
+
|
|
223
|
+
## D31 — Outcome Dimension for Plan-Checker
|
|
224
|
+
- Yu et al. "Outcome-Refining Process Supervision for Code Generation" (ICML 2025): +26.9% correctness with hybrid process+outcome supervision
|
|
225
|
+
- Rajan "Multi-Agent Code Verification via Information Theory" (2025): diminishing returns plateau at 4-7 dimensions
|
|
226
|
+
- Lightman et al. "Let's Verify Step by Step" (ICLR 2024): process supervision significantly outperforms outcome-only
|
|
227
|
+
- `distilled/templates/delegates/plan-checker.md` (`goal_achievement` dimension)
|
|
228
|
+
|
|
229
|
+
## D32 — Quick Workflow Alignment Hardening
|
|
230
|
+
- Risk-adaptive autonomy pattern (AWS, Azure, Anthropic 2025-2026): confirmation gates scale with consequence
|
|
231
|
+
- Anthropic agent autonomy research (2026): human-on-the-loop > human-in-the-loop
|
|
232
|
+
- Madaan et al. "Self-Refine" (NeurIPS 2023): 1 revision cycle captures most improvement
|
|
233
|
+
- `distilled/workflows/quick.md` (Steps 3.5-3.7), `tests/gsdd.guards.test.cjs` (G24)
|
|
234
|
+
|
|
235
|
+
## D33 — Quick Approach Clarification
|
|
236
|
+
- Anthropic "Measuring AI agent autonomy in practice" (2025): Claude asks 2x+ on complex tasks
|
|
237
|
+
- Knight First Amendment Institute "Levels of Autonomy for AI Agents" (2025): 5-level autonomy spectrum
|
|
238
|
+
- Anthropic "Framework for safe and trustworthy agents" (2025): recommendation-first framing
|
|
239
|
+
- Martin Fowler "Humans and Agents in SE Loops" (2025): HOTL > HITL
|
|
240
|
+
- `distilled/workflows/quick.md` (Step 2.5), `tests/gsdd.guards.test.cjs` (G24)
|
|
241
|
+
|
|
242
|
+
## D34 — Context Engineering Applied to Quick Workflow
|
|
243
|
+
- Anthropic Claude Prompting Best Practices: XML tags for semantic structure and attention
|
|
244
|
+
- Selective Prompt Anchoring (arXiv 2408.09121, 2024): up to 12.9% Pass@1 improvement from strategic anchoring
|
|
245
|
+
- `agentskit-architect SKILL.md` (prompty): identical hybrid XML-outer/markdown-inner structure
|
|
246
|
+
- `distilled/DESIGN.md` (DISTILLATION.md authority language resolution)
|
|
247
|
+
- `distilled/workflows/quick.md` (`<anti_patterns>` section, STOP normalization)
|
|
248
|
+
|
|
249
|
+
## D35 — Skills-Native Runtimes vs Governance Adapters
|
|
250
|
+
- Live consumer testing (2026-03-20): Cursor and Copilot auto-discover `.agents/skills/`
|
|
251
|
+
- User-performed live validation (2026-03-25): Gemini confirms same behavior
|
|
252
|
+
- `bin/lib/init.mjs` (adapter registry and root-governance generator)
|
|
253
|
+
- `README.md`, `distilled/templates/agents.block.md`, `tests/gsdd.guards.test.cjs`
|
|
254
|
+
|
|
255
|
+
## D36 — Interactive Init Wizard
|
|
256
|
+
- `bin/lib/init.mjs` existing adapter-selection seam
|
|
257
|
+
- Local research on adjacent `prompty` repo: portable skills as primary install surface
|
|
258
|
+
- Repo lesson LL-INSTALL-DX-BEFORE-ALIAS-CLEANUP (lessons-learned.md)
|
|
259
|
+
- `bin/lib/init.mjs`, `bin/gsdd.mjs`, `tests/gsdd.init.test.cjs`
|
|
260
|
+
- npm init, Vite `create-vite`, Next.js `create-next-app`, Angular CLI `ng new`, Astro `create astro` — all use TTY-interactive wizard with headless flags (industry standard for project scaffolding)
|
|
261
|
+
|
|
262
|
+
## D37 — Mutability-Driven Workflow Classification
|
|
263
|
+
- `distilled/workflows/verify.md`, `new-project.md`, `audit-milestone.md`, `pause.md`, `resume.md` (all require artifact writes)
|
|
264
|
+
- `distilled/workflows/progress.md` (only read-only workflow)
|
|
265
|
+
- Consumer audit: verification reports lost when persistence skipped
|
|
266
|
+
- `bin/gsdd.mjs`, `bin/lib/rendering.mjs`, `tests/gsdd.guards.test.cjs` (G27)
|
|
267
|
+
- Meyer's Command-Query Separation (CQS, "Object-Oriented Software Construction" 1988) — classify operations by mutation behavior, not semantic category
|
|
268
|
+
- Greg Young's CQRS (2010) — CQS applied at the architectural level
|
|
269
|
+
- Unix rwx model + AWS IAM / Kubernetes RBAC — classify by mutation semantics as industry norm
|
|
270
|
+
|
|
271
|
+
## D38 — Retroactive Artifact Enforcement
|
|
272
|
+
- `.internal-research/gaps.md` I27 entry (two occurrences, root-cause analysis, close conditions)
|
|
273
|
+
- `distilled/workflows/execute.md` (D28 SUMMARY.md persistence gate)
|
|
274
|
+
- `distilled/workflows/verify.md` (D28 VERIFICATION.md persistence gate + D28/G30 ROADMAP closure)
|
|
275
|
+
- `distilled/workflows/audit-milestone.md` (retroactive artifact completeness check)
|
|
276
|
+
- `.internal-research/strategy.md` (kernel simplicity vs policy depth trade-off)
|
|
277
|
+
- `tests/gsdd.guards.test.cjs` (G30 guard for ROADMAP closure on pass)
|
|
278
|
+
- NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 (2020) — detective vs preventive controls as equally valid risk-management strategies
|
|
279
|
+
- ISO 27001 risk treatment — choice of detective vs preventive depends on cost/complexity tradeoff
|
|
280
|
+
- Reason's Swiss Cheese model (1990) — layered defense where retroactive audit catches what preventive layers miss
|
|
281
|
+
|
|
282
|
+
## D39 — Brownfield Entry Wiring
|
|
283
|
+
- User brownfield audit finding (2026-03-20): map-codebase was useful but not presented as the start of a lightweight feature-work lane
|
|
284
|
+
- Existing quick-workflow hardening decisions D32-D34: quick already had alignment and scope controls, so the open gap was routing/context, not quick quality
|
|
285
|
+
- `distilled/workflows/quick.md` (Step 2 codebase-context read, planner delegate context)
|
|
286
|
+
- `distilled/workflows/map-codebase.md` (completion offers `/gsdd-quick` as the brownfield lane)
|
|
287
|
+
- `tests/gsdd.guards.test.cjs`, `tests/gsdd.scenarios.test.cjs`
|
|
288
|
+
|
|
289
|
+
---
|
|
290
|
+
|
|
291
|
+
## Maintenance
|
|
292
|
+
|
|
293
|
+
Update this file when:
|
|
294
|
+
- A new design decision is added to `distilled/DESIGN.md` (add entry here before or alongside the DESIGN.md commit)
|
|
295
|
+
- An existing decision's evidence changes (update the relevant entry)
|
|
296
|
+
|
|
297
|
+
Guard: G31 in `tests/gsdd.guards.test.cjs` asserts every decision in DESIGN.md ToC has an entry here with at least one source.
|
package/distilled/README.md
CHANGED
|
@@ -1,16 +1,22 @@
|
|
|
1
|
-
#
|
|
1
|
+
# Northline
|
|
2
2
|
|
|
3
|
-
|
|
3
|
+
A repo-native workflow kernel for long-horizon AI software delivery.
|
|
4
4
|
|
|
5
|
-
|
|
5
|
+
Northline gives long-horizon AI-assisted software work a durable repo spine for planning, execution, verification, and handoff. The package and CLI remain `gsdd-cli` / `gsdd`.
|
|
6
6
|
|
|
7
7
|
## What This Is
|
|
8
8
|
|
|
9
|
-
|
|
9
|
+
Northline is a small set of workflow sources plus a CLI (`gsdd`) that:
|
|
10
10
|
- scaffolds a project planning workspace (`.planning/`)
|
|
11
11
|
- generates portable workflow entrypoints as skills (`.agents/skills/gsdd-*/SKILL.md`)
|
|
12
12
|
- optionally generates tool-specific adapters for runtimes that need extra native surfaces (root `AGENTS.md`, Claude skills + plan-command alias + native agents, OpenCode commands + native agents)
|
|
13
13
|
|
|
14
|
+
It gives serious AI-assisted software work one durable repo workflow spine for planning, execution, verification, and handoff without pretending to be a hosted orchestration layer.
|
|
15
|
+
|
|
16
|
+
Launch proof posture:
|
|
17
|
+
- Directly validated in repo truth: Claude Code, Codex CLI, OpenCode
|
|
18
|
+
- Qualified support only: Cursor, Copilot, Gemini CLI via the shared `.agents/skills/` surface plus optional governance
|
|
19
|
+
|
|
14
20
|
## Quick Start
|
|
15
21
|
|
|
16
22
|
Run in your project root:
|
|
@@ -18,38 +24,46 @@ Run in your project root:
|
|
|
18
24
|
npx gsdd-cli init
|
|
19
25
|
```
|
|
20
26
|
|
|
27
|
+
In a TTY, `gsdd init` now opens a guided install wizard: choose runtimes first, then decide separately whether repo-wide `AGENTS.md` governance is worth installing.
|
|
28
|
+
|
|
21
29
|
Optional adapters:
|
|
22
30
|
```bash
|
|
23
31
|
npx gsdd-cli init --tools claude
|
|
24
32
|
npx gsdd-cli init --tools opencode
|
|
25
33
|
npx gsdd-cli init --tools codex
|
|
26
34
|
npx gsdd-cli init --tools agents
|
|
35
|
+
npx gsdd-cli init --tools cursor
|
|
27
36
|
npx gsdd-cli init --tools all
|
|
28
37
|
```
|
|
29
38
|
|
|
30
39
|
Notes:
|
|
31
40
|
- `gsdd init` always generates open-standard skills at `.agents/skills/gsdd-*`. This is also the primary Codex CLI surface.
|
|
41
|
+
- `--tools ...` remains the manual/headless path; legacy runtime aliases such as `cursor`, `copilot`, and `gemini` are still supported for backward compatibility.
|
|
32
42
|
- `--tools claude` also generates native agents at `.claude/agents/gsdd-*.md` and a compatibility plan command alias at `.claude/commands/gsdd-plan.md`.
|
|
33
43
|
- `--tools opencode` also generates native agents at `.opencode/agents/gsdd-*.md`.
|
|
34
44
|
- `--tools codex` generates `.codex/agents/gsdd-plan-checker.toml`; the portable `.agents/skills/gsdd-plan/` surface remains the Codex entry path.
|
|
35
|
-
- Root `AGENTS.md` is only written when explicitly requested (`--tools agents
|
|
45
|
+
- Root `AGENTS.md` is only written when explicitly requested (`--tools agents`, `--tools all`, legacy runtime aliases, or the wizard governance opt-in).
|
|
36
46
|
|
|
37
47
|
## The Workflow
|
|
38
48
|
|
|
39
49
|
```
|
|
40
|
-
gsdd init
|
|
41
|
-
/gsdd
|
|
42
|
-
/gsdd
|
|
43
|
-
/gsdd
|
|
44
|
-
/gsdd
|
|
50
|
+
gsdd init -> bootstrap (create .planning/, copy templates, generate skills/adapters)
|
|
51
|
+
/gsdd-new-project -> .planning/SPEC.md + .planning/ROADMAP.md (questioning + codebase audit + research)
|
|
52
|
+
/gsdd-plan N -> phases/N/PLAN.md (task breakdown + research)
|
|
53
|
+
/gsdd-execute N -> code changes (plan execution with quality gates)
|
|
54
|
+
/gsdd-verify N -> VERIFICATION.md (goal-backward validation)
|
|
45
55
|
... repeat plan/execute/verify per phase ...
|
|
46
|
-
/gsdd
|
|
47
|
-
/gsdd
|
|
48
|
-
/gsdd
|
|
49
|
-
/gsdd
|
|
56
|
+
/gsdd-audit-milestone -> MILESTONE-AUDIT.md (cross-phase integration + requirements coverage)
|
|
57
|
+
/gsdd-complete-milestone -> milestones/vX.Y-* (archive, evolve spec, collapse roadmap)
|
|
58
|
+
/gsdd-new-milestone -> updated SPEC.md + ROADMAP.md (next milestone goals + phases)
|
|
59
|
+
/gsdd-plan-milestone-gaps -> gap closure phases in ROADMAP.md (from audit results)
|
|
60
|
+
/gsdd-quick -> .planning/quick/NNN/ (sub-hour task outside phases)
|
|
61
|
+
/gsdd-pause -> .planning/.continue-here.md (session checkpoint)
|
|
62
|
+
/gsdd-resume -> restore context, route to next action
|
|
63
|
+
/gsdd-progress -> show status, route to next action
|
|
50
64
|
```
|
|
51
65
|
|
|
52
|
-
## Current Status (updated 2026-
|
|
66
|
+
## Current Status (updated 2026-04-10)
|
|
53
67
|
|
|
54
68
|
| Workflow | Status | Notes |
|
|
55
69
|
|----------|--------|-------|
|
|
@@ -58,11 +72,15 @@ gsdd init -> bootstrap (create .planning/, copy templates, generate sk
|
|
|
58
72
|
| `execute.md` | [OK] Source-audited | Mandatory read enforcement, auth-gate routing, deviation-rule examples, and substantive summary quality gate |
|
|
59
73
|
| `verify.md` | [OK] Source-audited | 5 gap closures against hardened verifier role contract: grouped-gap guidance, orphan detection, frontmatter enforcement, verification basis emphasis, requirements coverage chain |
|
|
60
74
|
| `audit-milestone.md` | [OK] Defined, source-audited | Aggregates phase verification, cross-phase integration audit, auth protection checks, requirement reconciliation, and orphan detection into `MILESTONE-AUDIT.md` |
|
|
75
|
+
| `complete-milestone.md` | [OK] Defined | Archives milestone, evolves SPEC.md, collapses ROADMAP.md — no gsd-tools.cjs dependency |
|
|
76
|
+
| `new-milestone.md` | [OK] Defined | Brownfield milestone continuation: goals, SPEC.md requirements, ROADMAP.md phases |
|
|
77
|
+
| `plan-milestone-gaps.md` | [OK] Defined (unvalidated) | Gap closure phases from MILESTONE-AUDIT.md results |
|
|
61
78
|
| `quick.md` | [OK] | Quick-work lane for sub-hour tasks outside the phase cycle (D11) |
|
|
62
79
|
| `pause.md` | [OK] Source-audited | Session checkpoint writer with conversational handoff (D12) |
|
|
63
80
|
| `resume.md` | [OK] Source-audited | Session context restorer with priority-ordered routing (D12) |
|
|
64
81
|
| `progress.md` | [OK] Source-audited | Read-only status reporter with 6 named route branches, recent work, between-milestones detection (D12) |
|
|
65
82
|
| `map-codebase.md` | [OK] Defined, source-audited | Standalone codebase mapping/refresh |
|
|
83
|
+
| `verify-work.md` | [OK] Defined | Conversational UAT validation with structured gap tracking |
|
|
66
84
|
|
|
67
85
|
Architecture notes:
|
|
68
86
|
- `bin/gsdd.mjs` remains the thin generator entrypoint, while vendor-specific rendering lives in adapter modules.
|
|
@@ -70,6 +88,7 @@ Architecture notes:
|
|
|
70
88
|
- Portable lifecycle contracts now align to the roadmap template status grammar: `[ ]`, `[-]`, `[x]`.
|
|
71
89
|
- Phase verification and milestone integration audit are treated as separate concerns.
|
|
72
90
|
- Canonical role contracts use bounded sections, typed output examples, and checklist-driven completion where those structures materially improve downstream reliability.
|
|
91
|
+
- Public launch wording is conservative by design: direct proof is claimed only for runtimes with recorded lifecycle evidence in `.planning/research/09-RESEARCH.md`.
|
|
73
92
|
|
|
74
93
|
## Init Workflow Agent Count (by config)
|
|
75
94
|
|
|
@@ -96,10 +115,14 @@ Note: `parallelization: false` keeps the same mapper/researcher set but runs the
|
|
|
96
115
|
research/ # optional research outputs
|
|
97
116
|
.agents/skills/
|
|
98
117
|
gsdd-new-project/SKILL.md
|
|
118
|
+
gsdd-new-milestone/SKILL.md
|
|
99
119
|
gsdd-plan/SKILL.md
|
|
120
|
+
gsdd-plan-milestone-gaps/SKILL.md
|
|
100
121
|
gsdd-execute/SKILL.md
|
|
101
122
|
gsdd-verify/SKILL.md
|
|
123
|
+
gsdd-verify-work/SKILL.md
|
|
102
124
|
gsdd-audit-milestone/SKILL.md
|
|
125
|
+
gsdd-complete-milestone/SKILL.md
|
|
103
126
|
gsdd-quick/SKILL.md
|
|
104
127
|
gsdd-pause/SKILL.md
|
|
105
128
|
gsdd-resume/SKILL.md
|
|
@@ -126,19 +149,24 @@ Note: `parallelization: false` keeps the same mapper/researcher set but runs the
|
|
|
126
149
|
|
|
127
150
|
```
|
|
128
151
|
distilled/
|
|
129
|
-
DESIGN.md # design decisions and rationale (
|
|
152
|
+
DESIGN.md # design decisions and rationale (39 decisions, evidence-backed)
|
|
153
|
+
EVIDENCE-INDEX.md # source-to-decision index for durable research-backed claims
|
|
130
154
|
SKILL.md # primary entry point (plain markdown)
|
|
131
155
|
workflows/
|
|
132
|
-
|
|
156
|
+
audit-milestone.md
|
|
157
|
+
complete-milestone.md
|
|
158
|
+
execute.md
|
|
133
159
|
map-codebase.md
|
|
160
|
+
new-project.md
|
|
161
|
+
new-milestone.md
|
|
162
|
+
pause.md
|
|
134
163
|
plan.md
|
|
164
|
+
plan-milestone-gaps.md
|
|
135
165
|
progress.md
|
|
136
|
-
execute.md
|
|
137
|
-
verify.md
|
|
138
|
-
audit-milestone.md
|
|
139
166
|
quick.md
|
|
140
|
-
pause.md
|
|
141
167
|
resume.md
|
|
168
|
+
verify-work.md
|
|
169
|
+
verify.md
|
|
142
170
|
templates/
|
|
143
171
|
spec.md
|
|
144
172
|
roadmap.md
|
package/distilled/SKILL.md
CHANGED
|
@@ -1,85 +1,89 @@
|
|
|
1
|
-
---
|
|
2
|
-
name: GSDD (Spec-Driven Development)
|
|
3
|
-
description: Disciplined, lightweight workflow for AI-assisted development. Spec first, then build, then verify.
|
|
4
|
-
---
|
|
5
|
-
|
|
6
|
-
<role>
|
|
7
|
-
You are an AI agent following the GSDD workflow. You are a disciplined engineer, not a code generator.
|
|
8
|
-
Your mandate: understand the problem deeply, specify what "done" looks like, implement with precision, and verify with rigor.
|
|
9
|
-
</role>
|
|
10
|
-
|
|
11
|
-
<principles>
|
|
12
|
-
1. Spec first: do not write code without a written spec that defines "done".
|
|
13
|
-
2. Clean commits: group changes logically following repo conventions. Do not bundle unrelated changes.
|
|
14
|
-
3. Verify everything: verify observable success criteria, not vibes.
|
|
15
|
-
4. Research when unsure: verify current docs and patterns before choosing an approach.
|
|
16
|
-
5. Honest reporting: a clear failure report beats a false pass.
|
|
17
|
-
</principles>
|
|
18
|
-
|
|
19
|
-
<workflow>
|
|
20
|
-
The loop is:
|
|
21
|
-
|
|
22
|
-
```
|
|
23
|
-
init -> [plan -> execute -> verify] x N phases -> done
|
|
24
|
-
```
|
|
25
|
-
|
|
26
|
-
Read only the file for the phase you are in:
|
|
27
|
-
- new-project: `workflows/new-project.md`
|
|
28
|
-
- plan: `workflows/plan.md`
|
|
29
|
-
- execute: `workflows/execute.md`
|
|
30
|
-
- verify: `workflows/verify.md`
|
|
31
|
-
-
|
|
32
|
-
|
|
33
|
-
|
|
34
|
-
|
|
35
|
-
|
|
36
|
-
|
|
37
|
-
|
|
38
|
-
|
|
39
|
-
|
|
40
|
-
-
|
|
41
|
-
|
|
42
|
-
|
|
43
|
-
|
|
44
|
-
|
|
45
|
-
|
|
46
|
-
|
|
47
|
-
|
|
48
|
-
|
|
49
|
-
|
|
50
|
-
|
|
51
|
-
|
|
52
|
-
|
|
53
|
-
|
|
54
|
-
|
|
55
|
-
|
|
56
|
-
|
|
57
|
-
|
|
58
|
-
|
|
59
|
-
|
|
60
|
-
|
|
61
|
-
|
|
62
|
-
|
|
63
|
-
|
|
64
|
-
```
|
|
65
|
-
|
|
66
|
-
|
|
67
|
-
|
|
68
|
-
|
|
69
|
-
|
|
70
|
-
|
|
71
|
-
|
|
72
|
-
|
|
73
|
-
|
|
74
|
-
|
|
75
|
-
|
|
76
|
-
|
|
77
|
-
|
|
78
|
-
|
|
79
|
-
|
|
80
|
-
|
|
81
|
-
- `.planning/templates/
|
|
82
|
-
|
|
83
|
-
|
|
84
|
-
|
|
85
|
-
|
|
1
|
+
---
|
|
2
|
+
name: GSDD (Spec-Driven Development)
|
|
3
|
+
description: Disciplined, lightweight workflow for AI-assisted development. Spec first, then build, then verify.
|
|
4
|
+
---
|
|
5
|
+
|
|
6
|
+
<role>
|
|
7
|
+
You are an AI agent following the GSDD workflow. You are a disciplined engineer, not a code generator.
|
|
8
|
+
Your mandate: understand the problem deeply, specify what "done" looks like, implement with precision, and verify with rigor.
|
|
9
|
+
</role>
|
|
10
|
+
|
|
11
|
+
<principles>
|
|
12
|
+
1. Spec first: do not write code without a written spec that defines "done".
|
|
13
|
+
2. Clean commits: group changes logically following repo conventions. Do not bundle unrelated changes.
|
|
14
|
+
3. Verify everything: verify observable success criteria, not vibes.
|
|
15
|
+
4. Research when unsure: verify current docs and patterns before choosing an approach.
|
|
16
|
+
5. Honest reporting: a clear failure report beats a false pass.
|
|
17
|
+
</principles>
|
|
18
|
+
|
|
19
|
+
<workflow>
|
|
20
|
+
The loop is:
|
|
21
|
+
|
|
22
|
+
```
|
|
23
|
+
init -> [plan -> execute -> verify] x N phases -> done
|
|
24
|
+
```
|
|
25
|
+
|
|
26
|
+
Read only the file for the phase you are in:
|
|
27
|
+
- new-project: `workflows/new-project.md`
|
|
28
|
+
- plan: `workflows/plan.md`
|
|
29
|
+
- execute: `workflows/execute.md`
|
|
30
|
+
- verify: `workflows/verify.md`
|
|
31
|
+
- audit-milestone: `workflows/audit-milestone.md`
|
|
32
|
+
- complete-milestone: `workflows/complete-milestone.md`
|
|
33
|
+
- new-milestone: `workflows/new-milestone.md`
|
|
34
|
+
- plan-milestone-gaps: `workflows/plan-milestone-gaps.md`
|
|
35
|
+
- quick: `workflows/quick.md`
|
|
36
|
+
</workflow>
|
|
37
|
+
|
|
38
|
+
<governance>
|
|
39
|
+
Mandatory:
|
|
40
|
+
- Read before you write. If `.planning/` exists, read `.planning/SPEC.md`, `.planning/ROADMAP.md`, `.planning/config.json`.
|
|
41
|
+
- Stay in scope. Implement only what the current phase plan describes.
|
|
42
|
+
- Never hallucinate. Confirm paths and APIs from repo or docs before use.
|
|
43
|
+
- Research-first when unfamiliar. Log evidence, then plan.
|
|
44
|
+
- Exists -> Substantive -> Wired gate before claiming done.
|
|
45
|
+
</governance>
|
|
46
|
+
|
|
47
|
+
<project_structure>
|
|
48
|
+
GSDD uses `.planning/` as the durable workspace:
|
|
49
|
+
|
|
50
|
+
```
|
|
51
|
+
.planning/
|
|
52
|
+
SPEC.md
|
|
53
|
+
ROADMAP.md
|
|
54
|
+
config.json
|
|
55
|
+
templates/
|
|
56
|
+
phases/
|
|
57
|
+
research/
|
|
58
|
+
```
|
|
59
|
+
</project_structure>
|
|
60
|
+
|
|
61
|
+
<adapters>
|
|
62
|
+
Recommended: generate adapters with `gsdd`:
|
|
63
|
+
|
|
64
|
+
```bash
|
|
65
|
+
npx gsdd-cli init
|
|
66
|
+
npx gsdd-cli init --tools claude
|
|
67
|
+
npx gsdd-cli init --tools agents
|
|
68
|
+
```
|
|
69
|
+
|
|
70
|
+
Behavior:
|
|
71
|
+
- Always: generates open-standard skills at `.agents/skills/gsdd-*/SKILL.md` by embedding `distilled/workflows/*.md`. This is also the primary Codex CLI surface.
|
|
72
|
+
- Optional: generates tool adapters (root `AGENTS.md`, Claude `.claude/skills` + `.claude/commands` alias + `.claude/agents`, OpenCode `.opencode/commands` + `.opencode/agents`).
|
|
73
|
+
- Deprecated compatibility: `--tools codex` does not generate `.codex/AGENTS.md`; Codex CLI should use the default skills directly.
|
|
74
|
+
- Root `AGENTS.md` is only written when explicitly requested (so we do not pollute existing user governance).
|
|
75
|
+
</adapters>
|
|
76
|
+
|
|
77
|
+
<templates>
|
|
78
|
+
Use templates from `.planning/templates/` (copied from `distilled/templates/`) when producing planning artifacts.
|
|
79
|
+
|
|
80
|
+
Core:
|
|
81
|
+
- `.planning/templates/spec.md` -> `.planning/SPEC.md`
|
|
82
|
+
- `.planning/templates/roadmap.md` -> `.planning/ROADMAP.md`
|
|
83
|
+
|
|
84
|
+
Research:
|
|
85
|
+
- `.planning/templates/research/*.md` -> `.planning/research/*.md`
|
|
86
|
+
|
|
87
|
+
Brownfield codebase mapping:
|
|
88
|
+
- `.planning/templates/codebase/*.md` -> `.planning/codebase/*.md`
|
|
89
|
+
</templates>
|