gsd-pi 2.82.0-dev.725028083 → 2.82.0-dev.98ea09b1e

package/src/resources/extensions/gsd/tests/park-db-sync.test.ts

@@ -7,7 +7,7 @@
  */
 import { test } from "node:test";
 import assert from "node:assert/strict";
-import { mkdtempSync, mkdirSync, writeFileSync, rmSync } from "node:fs";
+import { existsSync, mkdtempSync, mkdirSync, writeFileSync, rmSync } from "node:fs";
 import { join } from "node:path";
 import { tmpdir } from "node:os";
 
@@ -48,6 +48,60 @@ test("parkMilestone updates DB status to 'parked' (#2694)", () => {
   }
 });
 
+test("parkMilestone ignores blocked SUMMARY.md when DB milestone is active (#5828)", () => {
+  const base = createBase();
+  try {
+    openDatabase(":memory:");
+    insertMilestone({ id: "M001", title: "Test", status: "active" });
+    writeFileSync(
+      join(base, ".gsd", "milestones", "M001", "M001-SUMMARY.md"),
+      [
+        "---",
+        "status: closeout_blocked",
+        "---",
+        "",
+        "# M001 Summary",
+        "",
+        "Completion was not persisted.",
+      ].join("\n"),
+      "utf-8",
+    );
+
+    const parked = parkMilestone(base, "M001", "test");
+
+    assert.ok(parked, "active DB row should allow parking despite a blocked SUMMARY.md");
+    assert.ok(
+      existsSync(join(base, ".gsd", "milestones", "M001", "M001-PARKED.md")),
+      "PARKED.md should be written",
+    );
+    assert.equal(getMilestone("M001")!.status, "parked", "DB status should be parked");
+  } finally {
+    closeDatabase();
+    rmSync(base, { recursive: true, force: true });
+  }
+});
+
+test("parkMilestone refuses DB-complete milestones (#5828)", () => {
+  const base = createBase();
+  try {
+    openDatabase(":memory:");
+    insertMilestone({ id: "M001", title: "Test", status: "complete" });
+
+    const parked = parkMilestone(base, "M001", "test");
+
+    assert.equal(parked, false, "complete DB row should not be parkable");
+    assert.equal(
+      existsSync(join(base, ".gsd", "milestones", "M001", "M001-PARKED.md")),
+      false,
+      "PARKED.md should not be written",
+    );
+    assert.equal(getMilestone("M001")!.status, "complete", "DB status should remain complete");
+  } finally {
+    closeDatabase();
+    rmSync(base, { recursive: true, force: true });
+  }
+});
+
 test("unparkMilestone updates DB status to 'active' (#2694)", () => {
   const base = createBase();
   try {

package/src/resources/extensions/gsd/tests/plan-milestone.test.ts

@@ -116,6 +116,32 @@ test('handlePlanMilestone rejects invalid payloads', async () => {
   }
 });
 
+test('handlePlanMilestone rejects delimiter characters in milestone and slice titles', async () => {
+  const base = makeTmpBase();
+  const dbPath = join(base, '.gsd', 'gsd.db');
+  openDatabase(dbPath);
+
+  try {
+    const milestoneResult = await handlePlanMilestone({ ...validParams(), title: 'Client/Server split' }, base);
+    assert.ok('error' in milestoneResult);
+    assert.match(milestoneResult.error, /validation failed: title is invalid: .*forward slash/);
+    assert.equal(getMilestone('M001'), null, 'invalid milestone title must not persist');
+
+    const sliceResult = await handlePlanMilestone({
+      ...validParams(),
+      slices: [
+        validParams().slices[0],
+        { ...validParams().slices[1], title: 'Client/Server migration' },
+      ],
+    }, base);
+    assert.ok('error' in sliceResult);
+    assert.match(sliceResult.error, /validation failed: slices\[1\]\.title is invalid: .*forward slash/);
+    assert.equal(getMilestoneSlices('M001').length, 0, 'invalid slice title must not persist partial roadmap state');
+  } finally {
+    cleanup(base);
+  }
+});
+
 test('handlePlanMilestone surfaces render failures and does not clear parse-visible state on failure', async () => {
   const base = makeTmpBase();
   const dbPath = join(base, '.gsd', 'gsd.db');

package/src/resources/extensions/gsd/tests/plan-slice-prompt.test.ts

@@ -65,7 +65,9 @@ test("plan-slice prompt: DB-backed tool names survive template substitution", ()
   const result = loadPrompt("plan-slice", { ...BASE_VARS, commitInstruction: "Do not commit." });
   assert.ok(result.includes("gsd_plan_slice"), "gsd_plan_slice should appear in rendered prompt");
   assert.ok(result.includes("gsd_plan_task"), "gsd_plan_task should appear in rendered prompt");
+  assert.ok(result.includes("gsd_decision_save"), "structural decisions should use DB-backed decision tool");
   assert.ok(result.includes("canonical write path"), "canonical write path language should survive substitution");
+  assert.doesNotMatch(result, /append them to `.gsd\/DECISIONS\.md`/);
 });
 
 test("plan-slice prompt: compact planning gates survive template substitution", () => {

package/src/resources/extensions/gsd/tests/plan-slice.test.ts

@@ -6,7 +6,7 @@ import { mkdtempSync, mkdirSync, rmSync, readFileSync, existsSync, writeFileSync
 import { join } from 'node:path';
 import { tmpdir } from 'node:os';
 
-import { openDatabase, closeDatabase, insertMilestone, insertSlice, getSlice, getSliceTasks, getTask } from '../gsd-db.ts';
+import { openDatabase, closeDatabase, insertMilestone, insertSlice, getSlice, getSliceTasks, getTask, getGateResults, updateTaskStatus } from '../gsd-db.ts';
 import { handlePlanSlice } from '../tools/plan-slice.ts';
 import { parsePlan } from '../parsers-legacy.ts';
 import { parseTaskPlanFile } from '../files.ts';
@@ -15,6 +15,10 @@ import { deriveState, invalidateStateCache } from '../state.ts';
 function makeTmpBase(): string {
   const base = mkdtempSync(join(tmpdir(), 'gsd-plan-slice-'));
   mkdirSync(join(base, '.gsd', 'milestones', 'M001', 'slices', 'S02', 'tasks'), { recursive: true });
+  mkdirSync(join(base, 'src', 'resources', 'extensions', 'gsd', 'tools'), { recursive: true });
+  writeFileSync(join(base, 'src', 'resources', 'extensions', 'gsd', 'tools', 'plan-milestone.ts'), '// fixture\n', 'utf-8');
+  writeFileSync(join(base, 'src', 'resources', 'extensions', 'gsd', 'tools', 'plan-task.ts'), '// fixture\n', 'utf-8');
+  writeFileSync(join(base, 'stale-input.py'), '# fixture\n', 'utf-8');
   return base;
 }
 
@@ -125,6 +129,31 @@ test('handlePlanSlice advances DB-derived state out of planning immediately', as
   }
 });
 
+test('handlePlanSlice clears sketch flag so DB-derived state leaves refining', async () => {
+  const base = makeTmpBase();
+  openDatabase(join(base, '.gsd', 'gsd.db'));
+
+  try {
+    insertMilestone({ id: 'M001', title: 'Milestone', status: 'active' });
+    insertSlice({ id: 'S02', milestoneId: 'M001', title: 'Planning slice', status: 'pending', demo: 'Rendered plans exist.', isSketch: true });
+
+    invalidateStateCache();
+    const before = await deriveState(base);
+    assert.equal(before.phase, 'refining');
+
+    const result = await handlePlanSlice(validParams(), base);
+    assert.ok(!('error' in result), `unexpected error: ${'error' in result ? result.error : ''}`);
+    assert.equal(getSlice('M001', 'S02')?.is_sketch, 0, 'planned slice must no longer be treated as a sketch');
+
+    invalidateStateCache();
+    const after = await deriveState(base);
+    assert.notEqual(after.phase, 'refining');
+    assert.equal(after.progress?.tasks?.total, 2);
+  } finally {
+    cleanup(base);
+  }
+});
+
 test('handlePlanSlice leaves omitted enrichment fields empty instead of rendering placeholders', async () => {
   const base = makeTmpBase();
   openDatabase(join(base, '.gsd', 'gsd.db'));
@@ -172,6 +201,28 @@ test('handlePlanSlice rejects invalid payloads', async () => {
   }
 });
 
+test('handlePlanSlice explains string task IO fields must be arrays', async () => {
+  const base = makeTmpBase();
+  openDatabase(join(base, '.gsd', 'gsd.db'));
+
+  try {
+    seedParentSlice();
+    const result = await handlePlanSlice({
+      ...validParams(),
+      tasks: [
+        {
+          ...validParams().tasks[0],
+          inputs: 'src/index.ts' as unknown as string[],
+        },
+      ],
+    }, base);
+    assert.ok('error' in result);
+    assert.match(result.error, /validation failed: tasks\[0\]\.inputs must be an array of strings, not string/);
+  } finally {
+    cleanup(base);
+  }
+});
+
 test('handlePlanSlice rejects absolute task IO paths outside the active worktree', async () => {
   const base = makeTmpBase();
   openDatabase(join(base, '.gsd', 'gsd.db'));
@@ -198,6 +249,63 @@ test('handlePlanSlice rejects absolute task IO paths outside the active worktree
   }
 });
 
+test('handlePlanSlice rejects missing task input paths before persisting tasks', async () => {
+  const base = makeTmpBase();
+  openDatabase(join(base, '.gsd', 'gsd.db'));
+
+  try {
+    seedParentSlice();
+    const result = await handlePlanSlice({
+      ...validParams(),
+      tasks: [
+        {
+          ...validParams().tasks[0],
+          inputs: ['fixtures/missing-source.json'],
+        },
+      ],
+    }, base);
+
+    assert.ok('error' in result);
+    assert.match(result.error, /pre-execution validation failed:/);
+    assert.match(result.error, /fixtures\/missing-source\.json/);
+    assert.equal(getSliceTasks('M001', 'S02').length, 0, 'invalid planning IO must not persist tasks');
+  } finally {
+    cleanup(base);
+  }
+});
+
+test('handlePlanSlice rejects task input paths created by later tasks before persisting tasks', async () => {
+  const base = makeTmpBase();
+  openDatabase(join(base, '.gsd', 'gsd.db'));
+
+  try {
+    seedParentSlice();
+    const params = validParams();
+    const result = await handlePlanSlice({
+      ...params,
+      tasks: [
+        {
+          ...params.tasks[0],
+          inputs: ['generated/report.json'],
+          expectedOutput: ['generated/summary.json'],
+        },
+        {
+          ...params.tasks[1],
+          inputs: [],
+          expectedOutput: ['generated/report.json'],
+        },
+      ],
+    }, base);
+
+    assert.ok('error' in result);
+    assert.match(result.error, /pre-execution validation failed:/);
+    assert.match(result.error, /sequence violation/);
+    assert.equal(getSliceTasks('M001', 'S02').length, 0, 'invalid task ordering must not persist tasks');
+  } finally {
+    cleanup(base);
+  }
+});
+
 test('handlePlanSlice accepts absolute task IO paths inside the active worktree', async () => {
   const base = makeTmpBase();
   openDatabase(join(base, '.gsd', 'gsd.db'));
@@ -304,3 +412,119 @@ test('handlePlanSlice reruns idempotently and refreshes parse-visible state', as
     cleanup(base);
   }
 });
+
+test('handlePlanSlice removes omitted pending tasks when replanning a smaller task set', async () => {
+  const base = makeTmpBase();
+  openDatabase(join(base, '.gsd', 'gsd.db'));
+
+  try {
+    seedParentSlice();
+    const fourTaskPlan = {
+      ...validParams(),
+      tasks: [
+        ...validParams().tasks,
+        { ...validParams().tasks[0], taskId: 'T03', title: 'Third task' },
+        { ...validParams().tasks[0], taskId: 'T04', title: 'Stale task', inputs: ['stale-input.py'] },
+      ],
+    };
+
+    const first = await handlePlanSlice(fourTaskPlan, base);
+    assert.ok(!('error' in first), `unexpected error: ${'error' in first ? first.error : ''}`);
+    const staleTaskPlanPath = join(base, '.gsd', 'milestones', 'M001', 'slices', 'S02', 'tasks', 'T04-PLAN.md');
+    assert.ok(existsSync(staleTaskPlanPath), 'initial plan should render T04');
+
+    const second = await handlePlanSlice({
+      ...validParams(),
+      tasks: fourTaskPlan.tasks.filter((task) => task.taskId !== 'T04'),
+    }, base);
+    assert.ok(!('error' in second), `unexpected error: ${'error' in second ? second.error : ''}`);
+
+    assert.deepEqual(getSliceTasks('M001', 'S02').map((task) => task.id), ['T01', 'T02', 'T03']);
+    assert.equal(getGateResults('M001', 'S02', 'task').some((gate) => gate.task_id === 'T04'), false);
+    assert.equal(existsSync(staleTaskPlanPath), false, 'omitted task plan artifact should be removed');
+  } finally {
+    cleanup(base);
+  }
+});
+
+test('handlePlanSlice rejects omitted completed tasks without changing slice or task state', async () => {
+  const base = makeTmpBase();
+  openDatabase(join(base, '.gsd', 'gsd.db'));
+
+  try {
+    seedParentSlice();
+    const fourTaskPlan = {
+      ...validParams(),
+      tasks: [
+        ...validParams().tasks,
+        { ...validParams().tasks[0], taskId: 'T03', title: 'Third task' },
+        { ...validParams().tasks[0], taskId: 'T04', title: 'Stale task', inputs: ['stale-input.py'] },
+      ],
+    };
+
+    const first = await handlePlanSlice(fourTaskPlan, base);
+    assert.ok(!('error' in first), `unexpected error: ${'error' in first ? first.error : ''}`);
+    const staleTaskPlanPath = join(base, '.gsd', 'milestones', 'M001', 'slices', 'S02', 'tasks', 'T04-PLAN.md');
+    assert.ok(existsSync(staleTaskPlanPath), 'initial plan should render T04');
+
+    updateTaskStatus('M001', 'S02', 'T04', 'complete', '2026-05-12T00:00:00.000Z');
+    const tasksBefore = getSliceTasks('M001', 'S02');
+    const gatesBefore = getGateResults('M001', 'S02', 'task');
+
+    const second = await handlePlanSlice({
+      ...validParams(),
+      goal: 'Rejected replan should not persist.',
+      tasks: fourTaskPlan.tasks.filter((task) => task.taskId !== 'T04'),
+    }, base);
+    assert.deepEqual(second, { error: 'cannot remove completed task T04' });
+
+    assert.equal(getSlice('M001', 'S02')?.goal, 'Persist slice planning through the DB.');
+    assert.deepEqual(getSliceTasks('M001', 'S02'), tasksBefore);
+    assert.deepEqual(getGateResults('M001', 'S02', 'task'), gatesBefore);
+    assert.ok(existsSync(staleTaskPlanPath), 'completed task plan artifact should remain after rejected replan');
+  } finally {
+    cleanup(base);
+  }
+});
+
+test('regression: validateTasks surfaces clean per-field errors for non-array IO inputs', async () => {
+  // Regression for the bug fixed in PR #5872: an earlier refactor on main
+  // (0b0e1a901) re-added validateStringArray() calls inside validateTasks
+  // without re-adding its import. The catch around validateParams swallowed
+  // the ReferenceError into a generic "validation failed: validateStringArray
+  // is not defined" message, so silent runtime breakage was possible.
+  //
+  // Exercise every validateStringArray call site (files, inputs, expectedOutput)
+  // so a future missing-import would surface as a per-field assertion failure
+  // here, not a deep ReferenceError that's easy to mis-diagnose.
+  const base = makeTmpBase();
+  openDatabase(join(base, '.gsd', 'gsd.db'));
+
+  try {
+    seedParentSlice();
+
+    for (const field of ['files', 'inputs', 'expectedOutput'] as const) {
+      const result = await handlePlanSlice({
+        ...validParams(),
+        tasks: [{
+          ...validParams().tasks[0],
+          [field]: 'not-an-array' as unknown as string[],
+        }],
+      }, base);
+      assert.ok('error' in result, `${field}: expected validation error, got success`);
+      assert.match(
+        result.error,
+        new RegExp(`tasks\\[0\\]\\.${field} must be an array`),
+        `${field}: expected per-field validation message, got: ${result.error}`,
+      );
+      assert.doesNotMatch(
+        result.error,
+        /is not defined/,
+        `${field}: validation surfaced ReferenceError — likely a missing import in plan-slice.ts`,
+      );
+      assert.equal(getSliceTasks('M001', 'S02').length, 0, `${field}: invalid input must not persist`);
+    }
+  } finally {
+    cleanup(base);
+  }
+});

package/src/resources/extensions/gsd/tests/plan-task.test.ts

@@ -79,6 +79,23 @@ test('handlePlanTask rejects invalid payloads', async () => {
   }
 });
 
+test('handlePlanTask explains string IO fields must be arrays', async () => {
+  const base = makeTmpBase();
+  openDatabase(join(base, '.gsd', 'gsd.db'));
+
+  try {
+    seedParent();
+    const result = await handlePlanTask({
+      ...validParams(),
+      expectedOutput: 'src/output.ts' as unknown as string[],
+    }, base);
+    assert.ok('error' in result);
+    assert.match(result.error, /validation failed: expectedOutput must be an array of strings, not string/);
+  } finally {
+    cleanup(base);
+  }
+});
+
 test('handlePlanTask rejects absolute task IO paths outside the active worktree', async () => {
   const base = makeTmpBase();
   openDatabase(join(base, '.gsd', 'gsd.db'));

package/src/resources/extensions/gsd/tests/post-exec-retry-bypass.test.ts

@@ -1,3 +1,5 @@
+// Project/App: GSD-2
+// File Purpose: Tests for post-execution retry bypass and verification gate failure handling.
 /**
  * post-exec-retry-bypass.test.ts — Tests for post-execution blocking failure retry bypass.
  *
@@ -9,7 +11,7 @@
 import { describe, test, mock, beforeEach, afterEach } from "node:test";
 import assert from "node:assert/strict";
 import { tmpdir } from "node:os";
-import { mkdirSync, writeFileSync, rmSync, existsSync } from "node:fs";
+import { mkdirSync, readFileSync, writeFileSync, rmSync } from "node:fs";
 import { join } from "node:path";
 
 import { runPostUnitVerification, type VerificationContext } from "../auto-verification.ts";
@@ -71,6 +73,7 @@ function setupTestEnvironment(): void {
   mkdirSync(milestonesDir, { recursive: true });
 
   process.chdir(tempDir);
+  invalidateAllCaches();
   _clearGsdRootCache();
 
   dbPath = join(gsdDir, "gsd.db");
@@ -140,6 +143,34 @@ function createBasicTask(): void {
   });
 }
 
+function createTaskWithoutVerify(): void {
+  insertMilestone({ id: "M001" });
+  insertSlice({
+    id: "S01",
+    milestoneId: "M001",
+    title: "Test Slice",
+    risk: "low",
+  });
+
+  insertTask({
+    id: "T01",
+    sliceId: "S01",
+    milestoneId: "M001",
+    title: "Task without host verification",
+    status: "pending",
+    planning: {
+      description: "Task intentionally missing runnable verification",
+      estimate: "1h",
+      files: [],
+      verify: "",
+      inputs: [],
+      expectedOutput: [],
+      observabilityImpact: "",
+    },
+    sequence: 0,
+  });
+}
+
 function createPostExecFailureTask(): void {
   insertMilestone({ id: "M001" });
   insertSlice({
@@ -327,6 +358,53 @@ describe("Post-execution blocking failure retry bypass", () => {
     assert.equal(row?.outcome, "fail");
     assert.equal(row?.failure_class, "artifact");
   });
+
+  test("execute-task with no host-owned verification pauses fail-closed", async () => {
+    createTaskWithoutVerify();
+
+    const ctx = makeMockCtx();
+    const pi = makeMockPi();
+    const pauseAutoMock = mock.fn(async () => {});
+    const s = makeMockSession(tempDir, { type: "execute-task", id: "M001/S01/T01" });
+
+    const result = await runPostUnitVerification({ s, ctx, pi }, pauseAutoMock);
+
+    assert.equal(result, "pause");
+    assert.equal(pauseAutoMock.mock.callCount(), 1);
+    assert.equal(s.pendingVerificationRetry, null);
+
+    const evidencePath = join(tempDir, ".gsd", "milestones", "M001", "slices", "S01", "tasks", "T01-VERIFY.json");
+    const evidence = JSON.parse(readFileSync(evidencePath, "utf-8"));
+    assert.equal(evidence.passed, false);
+    assert.equal(evidence.discoverySource, "none");
+    assert.ok(!("retryAttempt" in evidence), "no-host-checks evidence must not include retryAttempt");
+    assert.ok(!("maxRetries" in evidence), "no-host-checks evidence must not include maxRetries");
+  });
+
+  test("auto-discovered package.json verification failure retries instead of continuing", async () => {
+    createTaskWithoutVerify();
+    writeFileSync(
+      join(tempDir, "package.json"),
+      JSON.stringify({ scripts: { test: "exit 1" } }),
+      "utf-8",
+    );
+    writePreferences({
+      verification_auto_fix: true,
+      verification_max_retries: 2,
+    });
+
+    const ctx = makeMockCtx();
+    const pi = makeMockPi();
+    const pauseAutoMock = mock.fn(async () => {});
+    const s = makeMockSession(tempDir, { type: "execute-task", id: "M001/S01/T01" });
+
+    const result = await runPostUnitVerification({ s, ctx, pi }, pauseAutoMock);
+
+    assert.equal(result, "retry");
+    assert.equal(pauseAutoMock.mock.callCount(), 0);
+    assert.equal(s.pendingVerificationRetry?.unitId, "M001/S01/T01");
+    assert.match(s.pendingVerificationRetry?.failureContext ?? "", /npm run test/);
+  });
 });
 
 describe("Post-execution retry behavior", () => {

package/src/resources/extensions/gsd/tests/post-execution-checks.test.ts

@@ -127,6 +127,61 @@ import { b } from './b';
     assert.equal(imports.length, 2);
   });
 
+  test("ignores import-looking string literals in test fixtures", () => {
+    const source = `
+const rewritten = source.replace(
+  'import { normalizeZagrebBusinessDeadline } from "./cutoff";',
+  'const helper = true;'
+);
+
+import realThing from "./real-thing";
+`;
+    const imports = extractRelativeImports(source);
+    assert.deepEqual(imports, [
+      { importPath: "./real-thing", lineNum: 7 },
+    ]);
+  });
+
+  test("ignores import-looking lines inside template literals", () => {
+    const source = [
+      "const fixture = `",
+      "import missingThing from './missing-thing';",
+      "`;",
+      "",
+      "import realThing from './real-thing';",
+    ].join("\n");
+    const imports = extractRelativeImports(source);
+    assert.deepEqual(imports, [
+      { importPath: "./real-thing", lineNum: 5 },
+    ]);
+  });
+
+  test("ignores require() inside string literals", () => {
+    const source = [
+      'const fixture = "const x = require(\'./missing\');";',
+      "const otherFixture = 'const y = require(\"./also-missing\");';",
+      "const real = require('./real');",
+    ].join("\n");
+    const imports = extractRelativeImports(source);
+    assert.deepEqual(imports, [
+      { importPath: "./real", lineNum: 3 },
+    ]);
+  });
+
+  test("ignores require() inside template literals", () => {
+    const source = [
+      "const fixture = `",
+      "const x = require('./missing');",
+      "`;",
+      "",
+      "const real = require('./real');",
+    ].join("\n");
+    const imports = extractRelativeImports(source);
+    assert.deepEqual(imports, [
+      { importPath: "./real", lineNum: 5 },
+    ]);
+  });
+
   test("handles empty source", () => {
     const imports = extractRelativeImports("");
     assert.deepEqual(imports, []);
@@ -810,6 +865,37 @@ describe("runPostExecutionChecks", () => {
     }
   });
 
+  test("does not fail on import-looking strings in task key files", () => {
+    tempDir = join(tmpdir(), `post-exec-test-${Date.now()}`);
+    mkdirSync(tempDir, { recursive: true });
+    mkdirSync(join(tempDir, "tests"), { recursive: true });
+    writeFileSync(join(tempDir, "tests", "real-thing.ts"), "export default true;");
+    writeFileSync(
+      join(tempDir, "tests", "source-verifier.test.ts"),
+      `
+const rewritten = source.replace(
+  'import { normalizeZagrebBusinessDeadline } from "./cutoff";',
+  'const helper = true;'
+);
+
+import realThing from "./real-thing";
+assert.ok(realThing);
+`
+    );
+
+    try {
+      const task = createTask({
+        id: "T03",
+        key_files: ["tests/source-verifier.test.ts"],
+      });
+      const result = runPostExecutionChecks(task, [], tempDir);
+      assert.equal(result.status, "pass");
+      assert.deepEqual(result.checks, []);
+    } finally {
+      rmSync(tempDir, { recursive: true, force: true });
+    }
+  });
+
   test("returns fail status when blocking failure exists", () => {
     tempDir = join(tmpdir(), `post-exec-test-${Date.now()}`);
     mkdirSync(tempDir, { recursive: true });

package/src/resources/extensions/gsd/tests/post-unit-git-failure.test.ts

@@ -11,7 +11,7 @@ const source = readFileSync(
 
 test("postUnitPreVerification blocks on git action failure", () => {
   const failureBlock = extractSourceRegion(source, 'if (gitResult.status === "failed")');
-  assert.ok(failureBlock.includes('ctx.ui.notify(failureMsg, "error")'));
+  assert.ok(failureBlock.includes('ctx.ui.notify(failureMsg, opts?.softFailure ? "warning" : "error")'));
   assert.ok(failureBlock.includes("await pauseAuto(ctx, pi)"));
   assert.ok(failureBlock.includes('return "dispatched"'));
   assert.ok(!failureBlock.includes("git-action-failed-nonblocking"));