gsd-pi 2.73.1 → 2.74.0-dev.6e23363

package/src/resources/extensions/gsd/tests/commands-session-report.test.ts

@@ -0,0 +1,82 @@
+import test from "node:test";
+import assert from "node:assert/strict";
+
+// Test the formatting logic used by session-report.
+// The actual handler requires runtime context (metrics module), so we
+// test the core formatting and aggregation patterns.
+
+test("session-report: format cost correctly", () => {
+  // Simple cost formatting test
+  const formatCost = (cost: number): string => {
+    if (cost < 0.01) return "<$0.01";
+    return `$${cost.toFixed(2)}`;
+  };
+
+  assert.equal(formatCost(0), "<$0.01");
+  assert.equal(formatCost(0.005), "<$0.01");
+  assert.equal(formatCost(1.5), "$1.50");
+  assert.equal(formatCost(10.999), "$11.00");
+});
+
+test("session-report: format token count", () => {
+  const formatTokenCount = (count: number): string => {
+    if (count >= 1_000_000) return `${(count / 1_000_000).toFixed(1)}M`;
+    if (count >= 1_000) return `${(count / 1_000).toFixed(1)}K`;
+    return String(count);
+  };
+
+  assert.equal(formatTokenCount(500), "500");
+  assert.equal(formatTokenCount(1500), "1.5K");
+  assert.equal(formatTokenCount(1_200_000), "1.2M");
+});
+
+test("session-report: aggregate by model", () => {
+  interface UnitMetric {
+    model: string;
+    cost: number;
+  }
+
+  const units: UnitMetric[] = [
+    { model: "opus", cost: 1.0 },
+    { model: "opus", cost: 0.8 },
+    { model: "sonnet", cost: 0.3 },
+    { model: "sonnet", cost: 0.5 },
+    { model: "sonnet", cost: 0.2 },
+  ];
+
+  const byModel = new Map<string, { count: number; cost: number }>();
+  for (const u of units) {
+    const existing = byModel.get(u.model) ?? { count: 0, cost: 0 };
+    existing.count++;
+    existing.cost += u.cost;
+    byModel.set(u.model, existing);
+  }
+
+  const opus = byModel.get("opus")!;
+  assert.equal(opus.count, 2);
+  assert.ok(Math.abs(opus.cost - 1.8) < 0.01);
+
+  const sonnet = byModel.get("sonnet")!;
+  assert.equal(sonnet.count, 3);
+  assert.ok(Math.abs(sonnet.cost - 1.0) < 0.01);
+});
+
+test("session-report: --json flag detection", () => {
+  const args1 = "--json";
+  const args2 = "--save --json";
+  const args3 = "something else";
+
+  assert.ok(args1.includes("--json"));
+  assert.ok(args2.includes("--json"));
+  assert.ok(!args3.includes("--json"));
+});
+
+test("session-report: --save flag detection", () => {
+  const args1 = "--save";
+  const args2 = "--save --json";
+  const args3 = "";
+
+  assert.ok(args1.includes("--save"));
+  assert.ok(args2.includes("--save"));
+  assert.ok(!args3.includes("--save"));
+});

package/src/resources/extensions/gsd/tests/commands-ship.test.ts

@@ -0,0 +1,71 @@
+import test from "node:test";
+import assert from "node:assert/strict";
+
+// Test the PR content generation logic used by /gsd ship.
+// Full integration requires gh CLI + git, so we test the text generation.
+
+test("ship: generates TL;DR format", () => {
+  // Simulate generatePRContent output structure
+  const milestoneId = "M001";
+  const milestoneTitle = "User authentication system";
+
+  const title = `feat: ${milestoneTitle}`;
+  assert.equal(title, "feat: User authentication system");
+  assert.ok(title.length < 80); // PR title should be short
+});
+
+test("ship: --dry-run flag detection", () => {
+  const args1 = "--dry-run";
+  const args2 = "--draft --dry-run";
+  const args3 = "--draft";
+
+  assert.ok(args1.includes("--dry-run"));
+  assert.ok(args2.includes("--dry-run"));
+  assert.ok(!args3.includes("--dry-run"));
+});
+
+test("ship: --base flag parsing", () => {
+  const args = "--base develop --draft";
+  const baseMatch = args.match(/--base\s+(\S+)/);
+  assert.ok(baseMatch);
+  assert.equal(baseMatch[1], "develop");
+});
+
+test("ship: --base flag absent defaults", () => {
+  const args = "--draft";
+  const baseMatch = args.match(/--base\s+(\S+)/);
+  assert.equal(baseMatch, null);
+});
+
+test("ship: --force flag detection", () => {
+  const args1 = "--force";
+  const args2 = "";
+
+  assert.ok(args1.includes("--force"));
+  assert.ok(!args2.includes("--force"));
+});
+
+test("ship: change type checklist format", () => {
+  const checklist = [
+    "- [x] `feat` — New feature or capability",
+    "- [ ] `fix` — Bug fix",
+    "- [ ] `refactor` — Code restructuring",
+    "- [ ] `test` — Adding or updating tests",
+    "- [ ] `docs` — Documentation only",
+    "- [ ] `chore` — Build, CI, or tooling changes",
+  ];
+
+  // Verify format matches CONTRIBUTING.md expectations
+  for (const line of checklist) {
+    assert.match(line, /^- \[[ x]\] `\w+` — .+$/);
+  }
+});
+
+test("ship: PR body contains required sections", () => {
+  const requiredSections = ["## TL;DR", "## Change type"];
+  const body = "## TL;DR\n\n**What:** Ship M001\n\n## Change type\n\n- [x] `feat`";
+
+  for (const section of requiredSections) {
+    assert.ok(body.includes(section), `Missing section: ${section}`);
+  }
+});

package/src/resources/extensions/gsd/tests/commands-workflow-custom.test.ts

@@ -217,6 +217,20 @@ describe("workflow command handler", () => {
     );
   });
 
+  it("preserves quoted workflow run overrides (#4130)", async () => {
+    const { parseWorkflowRunArgs } = await import("../commands/handlers/workflow.ts");
+    assert.deepStrictEqual(
+      parseWorkflowRunArgs('demo-workflow target="multi word target" region=\'us east\''),
+      {
+        defName: "demo-workflow",
+        overrides: {
+          target: "multi word target",
+          region: "us east",
+        },
+      },
+    );
+  });
+
   it("'/gsd workflow run nonexistent' shows error for missing definition", async () => {
     const { handled, notifications } = await callHandler("workflow run nonexistent-def-12345");
     assert.ok(handled, "should be handled");

package/src/resources/extensions/gsd/tests/complete-milestone-false-merge.test.ts

@@ -0,0 +1,142 @@
+/**
+ * complete-milestone-false-merge.test.ts — Regression test for #4175.
+ *
+ * Before the fix, a failed complete-milestone unit could leave a stub
+ * SUMMARY blocker placeholder on disk. stopAuto's SUMMARY-presence check
+ * then treated the milestone as complete and merged the worktree branch
+ * into main — emitting a misleading metadata-only merge warning for a
+ * milestone that was never legitimately finished.
+ *
+ * The fix has three cooperating parts:
+ *   1. stopAuto uses DB status (authoritative) instead of SUMMARY presence
+ *      when the project DB is available.
+ *   2. postUnitPreVerification pauses auto-mode for complete-milestone
+ *      after retries are exhausted instead of writing a blocker placeholder.
+ *   3. recoverTimedOutUnit pauses for complete-milestone instead of
+ *      writing a blocker placeholder.
+ *
+ * This test guards all three via source inspection so a future refactor
+ * cannot silently reintroduce the false-merge path.
+ */
+
+import test from "node:test";
+import assert from "node:assert/strict";
+import { readFileSync } from "node:fs";
+import { join } from "node:path";
+
+const gsdDir = join(import.meta.dirname, "..");
+const autoSrc = readFileSync(join(gsdDir, "auto.ts"), "utf-8");
+const postUnitSrc = readFileSync(join(gsdDir, "auto-post-unit.ts"), "utf-8");
+const timeoutSrc = readFileSync(join(gsdDir, "auto-timeout-recovery.ts"), "utf-8");
+
+test("#4175: stopAuto uses DB status as the authoritative milestone-complete signal", () => {
+  const step4Idx = autoSrc.indexOf("Step 4: Auto-worktree exit");
+  assert.ok(step4Idx !== -1, "Step 4 comment exists in stopAuto");
+  const step5Idx = autoSrc.indexOf("Step 5:", step4Idx);
+  const step4Block = autoSrc.slice(step4Idx, step5Idx);
+
+  assert.ok(
+    step4Block.includes("isDbAvailable()"),
+    "Step 4 should branch on isDbAvailable() so DB is consulted when present",
+  );
+  assert.ok(
+    step4Block.includes("getMilestone(s.currentMilestoneId)"),
+    "Step 4 should read authoritative milestone status via getMilestone()",
+  );
+  assert.ok(
+    /status\s*===\s*"complete"/.test(step4Block),
+    'Step 4 should compare the DB row status to "complete"',
+  );
+});
+
+test("#4175: stopAuto imports getMilestone from gsd-db", () => {
+  assert.ok(
+    /import\s*\{[^}]*\bgetMilestone\b[^}]*\}\s*from\s*"\.\/gsd-db\.js"/.test(autoSrc),
+    "auto.ts should import getMilestone from ./gsd-db.js",
+  );
+});
+
+test("#4175: stopAuto still falls back to SUMMARY presence when DB is unavailable", () => {
+  const step4Idx = autoSrc.indexOf("Step 4: Auto-worktree exit");
+  const step5Idx = autoSrc.indexOf("Step 5:", step4Idx);
+  const step4Block = autoSrc.slice(step4Idx, step5Idx);
+
+  assert.ok(
+    step4Block.includes("resolveMilestoneFile"),
+    "Step 4 should keep SUMMARY-file resolution for DB-unavailable projects",
+  );
+  assert.ok(
+    step4Block.includes("preserveBranch"),
+    "Step 4 should still preserve branch for incomplete milestones (fallback path)",
+  );
+});
+
+test("#4175: postUnitPreVerification pauses complete-milestone after retries exhausted", () => {
+  // The pause branch must live inside the retries-exhausted block, above the
+  // writeBlockerPlaceholder call — otherwise the stub SUMMARY is still written.
+  const retriesExhaustedIdx = postUnitSrc.indexOf(
+    "if (attempt > MAX_VERIFICATION_RETRIES)",
+  );
+  assert.ok(
+    retriesExhaustedIdx !== -1,
+    "retries-exhausted guard exists in postUnitPreVerification",
+  );
+
+  const blockerCallIdx = postUnitSrc.indexOf("writeBlockerPlaceholder", retriesExhaustedIdx);
+  assert.ok(
+    blockerCallIdx !== -1,
+    "blocker placeholder call still exists for non-milestone units",
+  );
+
+  const exhaustedBlock = postUnitSrc.slice(retriesExhaustedIdx, blockerCallIdx);
+
+  assert.ok(
+    /s\.currentUnit\.type\s*===\s*"complete-milestone"/.test(exhaustedBlock),
+    "retries-exhausted block should specifically handle complete-milestone",
+  );
+  assert.ok(
+    /pauseAuto\s*\(\s*ctx\s*,\s*pi\s*\)/.test(exhaustedBlock),
+    "complete-milestone path should call pauseAuto instead of falling through",
+  );
+  // The pause branch must return so execution never reaches writeBlockerPlaceholder.
+  assert.ok(
+    /return\s+"dispatched"\s*;/.test(exhaustedBlock),
+    "complete-milestone pause branch should return before the placeholder call",
+  );
+});
+
+test("#4175: recoverTimedOutUnit pauses complete-milestone instead of writing a blocker placeholder", () => {
+  // The complete-milestone pause branch must sit immediately above the
+  // "retries exhausted" writeBlockerPlaceholder call so a failed
+  // complete-milestone never produces a stub SUMMARY. Anchor on the
+  // comment that precedes that specific placeholder call rather than the
+  // function's earlier writeBlockerPlaceholder use sites or its import.
+  // Use lastIndexOf so we find the final retries-exhausted block in
+  // recoverTimedOutUnit, not an earlier helper with the same comment.
+  const exhaustedAnchor = "Retries exhausted — write a blocker placeholder";
+  const exhaustedIdx = timeoutSrc.lastIndexOf(exhaustedAnchor);
+  assert.ok(
+    exhaustedIdx !== -1,
+    "retries-exhausted blocker-placeholder path still exists for non-milestone units",
+  );
+
+  const guardIdx = timeoutSrc.lastIndexOf(
+    'unitType === "complete-milestone"',
+    exhaustedIdx,
+  );
+  assert.ok(
+    guardIdx !== -1,
+    "complete-milestone guard should appear above the retries-exhausted placeholder call",
+  );
+
+  const guardBlock = timeoutSrc.slice(guardIdx, exhaustedIdx);
+  assert.ok(
+    /return\s+"paused"\s*;/.test(guardBlock),
+    "complete-milestone guard should return 'paused' before the placeholder call",
+  );
+  // The guard itself must not call writeBlockerPlaceholder.
+  assert.ok(
+    !guardBlock.includes("writeBlockerPlaceholder"),
+    "complete-milestone guard must not write a blocker placeholder",
+  );
+});

package/src/resources/extensions/gsd/tests/complete-slice.test.ts

@@ -125,9 +125,9 @@ console.log('\n=== complete-slice: schema v6 migration ===');
 
   const adapter = _getAdapter()!;
 
-  // Verify schema version is current (v14 after indexes + slice_dependencies)
+  // Verify schema version is current (v15 with UOK projection tables)
   const versionRow = adapter.prepare('SELECT MAX(version) as v FROM schema_version').get();
-  assertEq(versionRow?.['v'], 14, 'schema version should be 14');
+  assertEq(versionRow?.['v'], 15, 'schema version should be 15');
 
   // Verify slices table has full_summary_md and full_uat_md columns
   const cols = adapter.prepare("PRAGMA table_info(slices)").all();

package/src/resources/extensions/gsd/tests/complete-task.test.ts

@@ -109,9 +109,9 @@ console.log('\n=== complete-task: schema v5 migration ===');
 
   const adapter = _getAdapter()!;
 
-  // Verify schema version is current (v14 after indexes + slice_dependencies)
+  // Verify schema version is current (v15 with UOK projection tables)
   const versionRow = adapter.prepare('SELECT MAX(version) as v FROM schema_version').get();
-  assertEq(versionRow?.['v'], 14, 'schema version should be 14');
+  assertEq(versionRow?.['v'], 15, 'schema version should be 15');
 
   // Verify all 4 new tables exist
   const tables = adapter.prepare(

package/src/resources/extensions/gsd/tests/completed-at-reconcile.test.ts

@@ -0,0 +1,42 @@
+/**
+ * Regression test for #4129: tasks.completed_at stays NULL when status is
+ * reconciled to 'complete' via the file-existence path in state.ts.
+ *
+ * Root cause: reconcileSliceTasks called
+ *   updateTaskStatus(milestoneId, sliceId, t.id, "complete")
+ * without a completedAt timestamp, so the column stays NULL.
+ *
+ * Fix: pass new Date().toISOString() as the 5th argument.
+ */
+
+import { describe, test } from "node:test";
+import assert from "node:assert/strict";
+import { readFileSync } from "node:fs";
+import { join, dirname } from "node:path";
+import { fileURLToPath } from "node:url";
+
+const __dirname = dirname(fileURLToPath(import.meta.url));
+const stateSource = readFileSync(join(__dirname, "..", "state.ts"), "utf-8");
+
+describe("completed-at reconcile (#4129)", () => {
+  test("reconcileSliceTasks passes a completedAt timestamp when setting status to complete", () => {
+    // Before the fix, state.ts had:
+    //   updateTaskStatus(milestoneId, sliceId, t.id, "complete")
+    // which leaves completed_at NULL in the DB.
+    // After the fix, a timestamp must be passed as the 5th argument.
+    assert.doesNotMatch(
+      stateSource,
+      /updateTaskStatus\(\s*milestoneId\s*,\s*sliceId\s*,\s*t\.id\s*,\s*["']complete["']\s*\)/,
+      "updateTaskStatus must not be called without a completedAt timestamp when reconciling tasks to 'complete' (#4129)",
+    );
+  });
+
+  test("reconcileSliceTasks passes new Date().toISOString() as the completedAt argument", () => {
+    // Positive assertion: the fixed call must include a timestamp.
+    assert.match(
+      stateSource,
+      /updateTaskStatus\(\s*milestoneId\s*,\s*sliceId\s*,\s*t\.id\s*,\s*["']complete["']\s*,\s*new Date\(\)\.toISOString\(\)\s*\)/,
+      "reconcileSliceTasks must pass new Date().toISOString() as completedAt when setting task status to 'complete' (#4129)",
+    );
+  });
+});

package/src/resources/extensions/gsd/tests/derive-state-crossval.test.ts

@@ -351,8 +351,9 @@ skills_used: []
       const dbState = await deriveStateFromDb(base);
 
       assertStatesEqual(dbState, fileState, 'E-blocked');
-      assert.deepStrictEqual(dbState.phase, 'blocked', 'E-blocked: phase is blocked');
-      assert.ok(dbState.blockers.length > 0, 'E-blocked: has blockers');
+      // With partial-dep fallback, circular deps no longer block — fallback picks first eligible slice
+      assert.deepStrictEqual(dbState.phase, 'planning', 'E-blocked: phase is planning (fallback picks a slice)');
+      assert.ok(dbState.activeSlice !== null, 'E-blocked: activeSlice is set via fallback');
 
       closeDatabase();
     } finally {

package/src/resources/extensions/gsd/tests/derive-state-db.test.ts

@@ -616,9 +616,10 @@ describe('derive-state-db', async () => {
       invalidateStateCache();
       const dbState = await deriveStateFromDb(base);
 
-      assert.deepStrictEqual(dbState.phase, 'blocked', 'blocked-db: phase is blocked');
+      // With partial-dep fallback, circular deps no longer block — fallback picks first eligible slice
+      assert.deepStrictEqual(dbState.phase, 'planning', 'blocked-db: phase is planning (fallback picks a slice)');
       assert.deepStrictEqual(dbState.phase, fileState.phase, 'blocked-db: phase matches filesystem');
-      assert.ok(dbState.blockers.length > 0, 'blocked-db: has blockers');
+      assert.ok(dbState.activeSlice !== null, 'blocked-db: activeSlice is set via fallback');
 
       closeDatabase();
     } finally {

package/src/resources/extensions/gsd/tests/derive-state-helpers.test.ts

@@ -307,27 +307,87 @@ describe('derive-state-helpers', () => {
     }
   });
 
-  // ─── buildCompletenessSet: SUMMARY-on-disk marks complete ───────────
-  test('buildCompletenessSet: milestone with SUMMARY on disk treated as complete', async () => {
+  // ─── buildCompletenessSet: DB status is authoritative ──────────────
+  test('buildCompletenessSet: DB status=complete marks milestone complete', async () => {
     const base = createFixtureBase();
     try {
-      // M001 has summary on disk but DB status is still 'active'
       writeFile(base, 'milestones/M001/M001-ROADMAP.md', ROADMAP_CONTENT);
       writeFile(base, 'milestones/M001/M001-SUMMARY.md', '# M001 Summary\n\nDone.');
-      // M002 is the real active milestone
       writeFile(base, 'milestones/M002/M002-CONTEXT.md', '# M002\n\nActive.');
 
       openDatabase(':memory:');
-      insertMilestone({ id: 'M001', title: 'First', status: 'active' });
+      insertMilestone({ id: 'M001', title: 'First', status: 'complete' });
       insertMilestone({ id: 'M002', title: 'Second', status: 'active' });
 
       invalidateStateCache();
       const state = await deriveStateFromDb(base);
 
-      // M001 should be complete (summary on disk), M002 should be active
       const m1 = state.registry.find(e => e.id === 'M001');
-      assert.equal(m1?.status, 'complete', 'summary-disk: M001 marked complete via disk SUMMARY');
-      assert.equal(state.activeMilestone?.id, 'M002', 'summary-disk: M002 is active');
+      assert.equal(m1?.status, 'complete', 'DB status=complete → registry entry complete');
+      assert.equal(state.activeMilestone?.id, 'M002', 'M002 is the active milestone');
+    } finally {
+      closeDatabase();
+      cleanup(base);
+    }
+  });
+
+  // ─── Regression #4179: orphan SUMMARY must NOT flip DB-active milestone ───
+  // A crashed complete-milestone turn (or stale/manual SUMMARY.md) can leave
+  // a milestone SUMMARY on disk while the DB row still reads 'active'. The
+  // read-side of state derivation must NOT treat the orphan SUMMARY as a
+  // completion signal, or the auto-loop advances and merges work that was
+  // never actually finished (same failure class as #4175, read-side twin).
+  test('buildCompletenessSet (#4179): orphan SUMMARY on disk does not mark DB-active milestone complete', async () => {
+    const base = createFixtureBase();
+    try {
+      writeFile(base, 'milestones/M001/M001-ROADMAP.md', ROADMAP_CONTENT);
+      writeFile(base, 'milestones/M001/M001-SUMMARY.md', '# M001 Orphan Summary\n\nLeft over from crashed turn.');
+
+      openDatabase(':memory:');
+      insertMilestone({ id: 'M001', title: 'First', status: 'active' });
+      // Slice still in-flight — auto should resume, not merge.
+      insertSlice({ id: 'S01', milestoneId: 'M001', title: 'First', status: 'active', risk: 'low', depends: [] });
+      insertSlice({ id: 'S02', milestoneId: 'M001', title: 'Second', status: 'pending', risk: 'low', depends: ['S01'] });
+      insertTask({ id: 'T01', sliceId: 'S01', milestoneId: 'M001', title: 'In-flight', status: 'pending' });
+
+      invalidateStateCache();
+      const state = await deriveStateFromDb(base);
+
+      const m1 = state.registry.find(e => e.id === 'M001');
+      assert.notEqual(m1?.status, 'complete', 'orphan SUMMARY must not mark milestone complete');
+      assert.equal(m1?.status, 'active', 'M001 remains active — DB is authoritative');
+      assert.equal(state.activeMilestone?.id, 'M001', 'M001 is still the active milestone');
+      assert.notEqual(state.phase, 'completing-milestone', 'must not short-circuit into completion');
+    } finally {
+      closeDatabase();
+      cleanup(base);
+    }
+  });
+
+  // Regression #4179 (companion): DB-active milestone with all slices done +
+  // validation terminal + orphan SUMMARY must still flow through completing-milestone
+  // (re-runs complete-milestone), not be reported as already-complete.
+  test('buildRegistryAndFindActive (#4179): orphan SUMMARY with validation-terminal falls through to completing-milestone', async () => {
+    const base = createFixtureBase();
+    try {
+      writeFile(base, 'milestones/M001/M001-ROADMAP.md', ROADMAP_CONTENT);
+      writeFile(base, 'milestones/M001/slices/S01/S01-PLAN.md', PLAN_CONTENT);
+      writeFile(base, 'milestones/M001/slices/S02/S02-PLAN.md', PLAN_CONTENT);
+      writeFile(base, 'milestones/M001/M001-VALIDATION.md', '---\nverdict: passed\n---\n# Validation\nAll good.');
+      writeFile(base, 'milestones/M001/M001-SUMMARY.md', '# M001 Orphan Summary\n\nLeft over.');
+
+      openDatabase(':memory:');
+      insertMilestone({ id: 'M001', title: 'First', status: 'active' });
+      insertSlice({ id: 'S01', milestoneId: 'M001', title: 'First', status: 'complete', risk: 'low', depends: [] });
+      insertSlice({ id: 'S02', milestoneId: 'M001', title: 'Second', status: 'complete', risk: 'low', depends: ['S01'] });
+
+      invalidateStateCache();
+      const state = await deriveStateFromDb(base);
+
+      const m1 = state.registry.find(e => e.id === 'M001');
+      assert.equal(m1?.status, 'active', 'M001 stays active despite orphan SUMMARY + validation-terminal');
+      assert.equal(state.activeMilestone?.id, 'M001', 'M001 is still the active milestone');
+      assert.equal(state.phase, 'completing-milestone', 'phase flows through completing-milestone (re-run)');
     } finally {
       closeDatabase();
       cleanup(base);

package/src/resources/extensions/gsd/tests/derive-state.test.ts

@@ -446,9 +446,9 @@ Continue from step 2.
 
       const state2 = await deriveState(base2);
 
-      assert.deepStrictEqual(state2.phase, 'blocked', 'blocked-B: phase is blocked');
-      assert.deepStrictEqual(state2.activeSlice, null, 'blocked-B: activeSlice is null');
-      assert.ok(state2.blockers.length > 0, 'blocked-B: blockers array is non-empty');
+      // With partial-dep fallback, S01 is picked despite unmet dep on S99
+      assert.deepStrictEqual(state2.phase, 'planning', 'blocked-B: phase is planning (fallback picks S01)');
+      assert.deepStrictEqual(state2.activeSlice?.id, 'S01', 'blocked-B: activeSlice is S01 via fallback');
     } finally {
       cleanup(base2);
     }