gsd-opencode 1.10.2 → 1.20.0

package/get-shit-done/workflows/execute-plan.md

@@ -11,1255 +11,283 @@ read config.json for planning behavior settings.
 
 <process>
 
-<step name="resolve_model_profile" priority="first">
-read model profile for agent spawning:
+<step name="init_context" priority="first">
+Load execution context (paths only to minimize orchestrator context):
 
 ```bash
-MODEL_PROFILE=$(cat .planning/config.json 2>/dev/null | grep -o '"model_profile"[[:space:]]*:[[:space:]]*"[^"]*"' | grep -o '"[^"]*"$' | tr -d '"' || echo "balanced")
+INIT=$(node ~/.config/opencode/get-shit-done/bin/gsd-tools.cjs init execute-phase "${PHASE}")
 ```
 
-Default to "balanced" if not set.
+Extract from init JSON: `executor_model`, `commit_docs`, `phase_dir`, `phase_number`, `plans`, `summaries`, `incomplete_plans`, `state_path`, `config_path`.
 
-**Model lookup table:**
-
-| Agent | quality | balanced | budget |
-|-------|---------|----------|--------|
-| gsd-executor | opus | sonnet | sonnet |
-
-Store resolved model for use in Task calls below.
-</step>
-
-<step name="load_project_state">
-Before any operation, read project state:
-
-```bash
-cat .planning/STATE.md 2>/dev/null
-```
-
-**If file exists:** Parse and internalize:
-
-- Current position (phase, plan, status)
-- Accumulated decisions (constraints on this execution)
-- Blockers/concerns (things to watch for)
-- Brief alignment status
-
-**If file missing but .planning/ exists:**
-
-```
-STATE.md missing but planning artifacts exist.
-Options:
-1. Reconstruct from existing artifacts
-2. Continue without project state (may lose accumulated context)
-```
-
-**If .planning/ doesn't exist:** Error - project not initialized.
-
-This ensures every execution has full project context.
-
-**Load planning config:**
-
-```bash
-# Check if planning docs should be committed (default: true)
-COMMIT_PLANNING_DOCS=$(cat .planning/config.json 2>/dev/null | grep -o '"commit_docs"[[:space:]]*:[[:space:]]*[^,}]*' | grep -o 'true\|false' || echo "true")
-# Auto-detect gitignored (overrides config)
-git check-ignore -q .planning 2>/dev/null && COMMIT_PLANNING_DOCS=false
-```
-
-Store `COMMIT_PLANNING_DOCS` for use in git operations.
+If `.planning/` missing: error.
 </step>
 
 <step name="identify_plan">
-Find the next plan to execute:
-- Check roadmap for "In progress" phase
-- Find plans in that phase directory
-- Identify first plan without corresponding SUMMARY
-
 ```bash
-cat .planning/ROADMAP.md
-# Look for phase with "In progress" status
-# Then find plans in that phase
+# Use plans/summaries from INIT JSON, or list files
 ls .planning/phases/XX-name/*-PLAN.md 2>/dev/null | sort
 ls .planning/phases/XX-name/*-SUMMARY.md 2>/dev/null | sort
 ```
 
-**Logic:**
-
-- If `01-01-PLAN.md` exists but `01-01-SUMMARY.md` doesn't → execute 01-01
-- If `01-01-SUMMARY.md` exists but `01-02-SUMMARY.md` doesn't → execute 01-02
-- Pattern: Find first PLAN file without matching SUMMARY file
-
-**Decimal phase handling:**
-
-Phase directories can be integer or decimal format:
-
-- Integer: `.planning/phases/01-foundation/01-01-PLAN.md`
-- Decimal: `.planning/phases/01.1-hotfix/01.1-01-PLAN.md`
-
-Parse phase number from path (handles both formats):
+Find first PLAN without matching SUMMARY. Decimal phases supported (`01.1-hotfix/`):
 
 ```bash
-# Extract phase number (handles XX or XX.Y format)
 PHASE=$(echo "$PLAN_PATH" | grep -oE '[0-9]+(\.[0-9]+)?-[0-9]+')
+# config settings can be fetched via gsd-tools config-get if needed
 ```
 
-SUMMARY naming follows same pattern:
-
-- Integer: `01-01-SUMMARY.md`
-- Decimal: `01.1-01-SUMMARY.md`
-
-Confirm with user if ambiguous.
-
-<config-check>
-```bash
-cat .planning/config.json 2>/dev/null
-```
-</config-check>
-
 <if mode="yolo">
-```
-⚡ Auto-approved: Execute {phase}-{plan}-PLAN.md
-[Plan X of Y for Phase Z]
-
-Starting execution...
-```
-
-Proceed directly to parse_segments step.
+Auto-approve: `⚡ Execute {phase}-{plan}-PLAN.md [Plan X of Y for Phase Z]` → parse_segments.
 </if>
 
 <if mode="interactive" OR="custom with gates.execute_next_plan true">
-Present:
-
-```
-Found plan to execute: {phase}-{plan}-PLAN.md
-[Plan X of Y for Phase Z]
-
-Proceed with execution?
-```
-
-Wait for confirmation before proceeding.
+Present plan identification, wait for confirmation.
 </if>
 </step>
 
 <step name="record_start_time">
-Record execution start time for performance tracking:
-
 ```bash
 PLAN_START_TIME=$(date -u +"%Y-%m-%dT%H:%M:%SZ")
 PLAN_START_EPOCH=$(date +%s)
 ```
-
-Store in shell variables for duration calculation at completion.
 </step>
 
 <step name="parse_segments">
-**Intelligent segmentation: Parse plan into execution segments.**
-
-Plans are divided into segments by checkpoints. Each segment is routed to optimal execution context (subagent or main).
-
-**1. Check for checkpoints:**
-
 ```bash
-# Find all checkpoints and their types
 grep -n "type=\"checkpoint" .planning/phases/XX-name/{phase}-{plan}-PLAN.md
 ```
 
-**2. Analyze execution strategy:**
-
-**If NO checkpoints found:**
-
-- **Fully autonomous plan** - spawn single subagent for entire plan
-- Subagent gets fresh 200k context, executes all tasks, creates SUMMARY, commits
-- Main context: Just orchestration (~5% usage)
-
-**If checkpoints found, parse into segments:**
-
-Segment = tasks between checkpoints (or start→first checkpoint, or last checkpoint→end)
-
-**For each segment, determine routing:**
-
-```
-Segment routing rules:
-
-IF segment has no prior checkpoint:
-  → SUBAGENT (first segment, nothing to depend on)
-
-IF segment follows checkpoint:human-verify:
-  → SUBAGENT (verification is just confirmation, doesn't affect next work)
-
-IF segment follows checkpoint:decision OR checkpoint:human-action:
-  → MAIN CONTEXT (next tasks need the decision/result)
-```
-
-**3. Execution pattern:**
-
-**Pattern A: Fully autonomous (no checkpoints)**
-
-```
-Spawn subagent → execute all tasks → SUMMARY → commit → report back
-```
-
-**Pattern B: Segmented with verify-only checkpoints**
+**Routing by checkpoint type:**
 
-```
-Segment 1 (tasks 1-3): Spawn subagent → execute → report back
-Checkpoint 4 (human-verify): Main context → you verify → continue
-Segment 2 (tasks 5-6): Spawn NEW subagent → execute → report back
-Checkpoint 7 (human-verify): Main context → you verify → continue
-Aggregate results → SUMMARY → commit
-```
-
-**Pattern C: Decision-dependent (must stay in main)**
-
-```
-Checkpoint 1 (decision): Main context → you decide → continue in main
-Tasks 2-5: Main context (need decision from checkpoint 1)
-No segmentation benefit - execute entirely in main
-```
-
-**4. Why this works:**
-
-**Segmentation benefits:**
-
-- Fresh context for each autonomous segment (0% start every time)
-- Main context only for checkpoints (~10-20% total)
-- Can handle 10+ task plans if properly segmented
-- Quality impossible to degrade in autonomous segments
-
-**When segmentation provides no benefit:**
-
-- Checkpoint is decision/human-action and following tasks depend on outcome
-- Better to execute sequentially in main than break flow
-
-**5. Implementation:**
-
-**For fully autonomous plans:**
-
-```
-1. Run init_agent_tracking step first (see step below)
-
-2. Use Task tool with subagent_type="gsd-executor" and model="{executor_model}":
-
-   Prompt: "Execute plan at .planning/phases/{phase}-{plan}-PLAN.md
-
-   This is an autonomous plan (no checkpoints). Execute all tasks, create SUMMARY.md in phase directory, commit with message following plan's commit guidance.
-
-   Follow all deviation rules and authentication gate protocols from the plan.
-
-   When complete, report: plan name, tasks completed, SUMMARY path, commit hash."
-
-3. After Task tool returns with agent_id:
-
-   a. write agent_id to current-agent-id.txt:
-      echo "[agent_id]" > .planning/current-agent-id.txt
-
-   b. Append spawn entry to agent-history.json:
-      {
-        "agent_id": "[agent_id from Task response]",
-        "task_description": "Execute full plan {phase}-{plan} (autonomous)",
-        "phase": "{phase}",
-        "plan": "{plan}",
-        "segment": null,
-        "timestamp": "[ISO timestamp]",
-        "status": "spawned",
-        "completion_timestamp": null
-      }
-
-4. Wait for subagent to complete
-
-5. After subagent completes successfully:
-
-   a. Update agent-history.json entry:
-      - Find entry with matching agent_id
-      - Set status: "completed"
-      - Set completion_timestamp: "[ISO timestamp]"
-
-   b. Clear current-agent-id.txt:
-      rm .planning/current-agent-id.txt
-
-6. Report completion to user
-```
-
-**For segmented plans (has verify-only checkpoints):**
-
-```
-Execute segment-by-segment:
+| Checkpoints | Pattern | Execution |
+|-------------|---------|-----------|
+| None | A (autonomous) | Single subagent: full plan + SUMMARY + commit |
+| Verify-only | B (segmented) | Segments between checkpoints. After none/human-verify → SUBAGENT. After decision/human-action → MAIN |
+| Decision | C (main) | Execute entirely in main context |
 
-For each autonomous segment:
-  Spawn subagent with prompt: "Execute tasks [X-Y] from plan at .planning/phases/{phase}-{plan}-PLAN.md. read the plan for full context and deviation rules. Do NOT create SUMMARY or commit - just execute these tasks and report results."
+**Pattern A:** init_agent_tracking → spawn task(subagent_type="gsd-executor", model=executor_model) with prompt: execute plan at [path], autonomous, all tasks + SUMMARY + commit, follow deviation/auth rules, report: plan name, tasks, SUMMARY path, commit hash → track agent_id → wait → update tracking → report.
 
-  Wait for subagent completion
+**Pattern B:** Execute segment-by-segment. Autonomous segments: spawn subagent for assigned tasks only (no SUMMARY/commit). Checkpoints: main context. After all segments: aggregate, create SUMMARY, commit. See segment_execution.
 
-For each checkpoint:
-  Execute in main context
-  Wait for user interaction
-  Continue to next segment
+**Pattern C:** Execute in main using standard flow (step name="execute").
 
-After all segments complete:
-  Aggregate all results
-  Create SUMMARY.md
-  Commit with all changes
-```
-
-**For decision-dependent plans:**
-
-```
-Execute in main context (standard flow below)
-No subagent routing
-Quality maintained through small scope (2-3 tasks per plan)
-```
-
-See step name="segment_execution" for detailed segment execution loop.
+Fresh context per subagent preserves peak quality. Main context stays lean.
 </step>
 
 <step name="init_agent_tracking">
-**Initialize agent tracking for subagent resume capability.**
-
-Before spawning any subagents, set up tracking infrastructure:
-
-**1. Create/verify tracking files:**
-
 ```bash
-# Create agent history file if doesn't exist
 if [ ! -f .planning/agent-history.json ]; then
   echo '{"version":"1.0","max_entries":50,"entries":[]}' > .planning/agent-history.json
 fi
-
-# Clear any stale current-agent-id (from interrupted sessions)
-# Will be populated when subagent spawns
 rm -f .planning/current-agent-id.txt
-```
-
-**2. Check for interrupted agents (resume detection):**
-
-```bash
-# Check if current-agent-id.txt exists from previous interrupted session
 if [ -f .planning/current-agent-id.txt ]; then
   INTERRUPTED_ID=$(cat .planning/current-agent-id.txt)
   echo "Found interrupted agent: $INTERRUPTED_ID"
 fi
 ```
 
-**If interrupted agent found:**
-- The agent ID file exists from a previous session that didn't complete
-- This agent can potentially be resumed using Task tool's `resume` parameter
-- Present to user: "Previous session was interrupted. Resume agent [ID] or start fresh?"
-- If resume: Use Task tool with `resume` parameter set to the interrupted ID
-- If fresh: Clear the file and proceed normally
+If interrupted: ask user to resume (task `resume` parameter) or start fresh.
 
-**3. Prune old entries (housekeeping):**
+**Tracking protocol:** On spawn: write agent_id to `current-agent-id.txt`, append to agent-history.json: `{"agent_id":"[id]","task_description":"[desc]","phase":"[phase]","plan":"[plan]","segment":[num|null],"timestamp":"[ISO]","status":"spawned","completion_timestamp":null}`. On completion: status → "completed", set completion_timestamp, delete current-agent-id.txt. Prune: if entries > max_entries, remove oldest "completed" (never "spawned").
 
-If agent-history.json has more than `max_entries`:
-- Remove oldest entries with status "completed"
-- Never remove entries with status "spawned" (may need resume)
-- Keep file under size limit for fast reads
-
-**When to run this step:**
-- Pattern A (fully autonomous): Before spawning the single subagent
-- Pattern B (segmented): Before the segment execution loop
-- Pattern C (main context): Skip - no subagents spawned
+Run for Pattern A/B before spawning. Pattern C: skip.
 </step>
 
 <step name="segment_execution">
-**Detailed segment execution loop for segmented plans.**
-
-**This step applies ONLY to segmented plans (Pattern B: has checkpoints, but they're verify-only).**
-
-For Pattern A (fully autonomous) and Pattern C (decision-dependent), skip this step.
-
-**Execution flow:**
-
-````
-1. Parse plan to identify segments:
-   - read plan file
-   - Find checkpoint locations: grep -n "type=\"checkpoint" PLAN.md
-   - Identify checkpoint types: grep "type=\"checkpoint" PLAN.md | grep -o 'checkpoint:[^"]*'
-   - Build segment map:
-     * Segment 1: Start → first checkpoint (tasks 1-X)
-     * Checkpoint 1: Type and location
-     * Segment 2: After checkpoint 1 → next checkpoint (tasks X+1 to Y)
-     * Checkpoint 2: Type and location
-     * ... continue for all segments
-
-2. For each segment in order:
+Pattern B only (verify-only checkpoints). Skip for A/C.
 
-   A. Determine routing (apply rules from parse_segments):
-      - No prior checkpoint? → Subagent
-      - Prior checkpoint was human-verify? → Subagent
-      - Prior checkpoint was decision/human-action? → Main context
+1. Parse segment map: checkpoint locations and types
+2. Per segment:
+   - Subagent route: spawn gsd-executor for assigned tasks only. Prompt: task range, plan path, read full plan for context, execute assigned tasks, track deviations, NO SUMMARY/commit. Track via agent protocol.
+   - Main route: execute tasks using standard flow (step name="execute")
+3. After ALL segments: aggregate files/deviations/decisions → create SUMMARY.md → commit → self-check:
+   - Verify key-files.created exist on disk with `[ -f ]`
+   - Check `git log --oneline --all --grep="{phase}-{plan}"` returns ≥1 commit
+   - Append `## Self-Check: PASSED` or `## Self-Check: FAILED` to SUMMARY
 
-   B. If routing = Subagent:
-      ```
-      Spawn Task tool with subagent_type="gsd-executor" and model="{executor_model}":
+   **Known OpenCode bug (classifyHandoffIfNeeded):** If any segment agent reports "failed" with `classifyHandoffIfNeeded is not defined`, this is a OpenCode runtime bug — not a real failure. Run spot-checks; if they pass, treat as successful.
 
-      Prompt: "Execute tasks [task numbers/names] from plan at [plan path].
 
-      **Context:**
-      - read the full plan for objective, context files, and deviation rules
-      - You are executing a SEGMENT of this plan (not the full plan)
-      - Other segments will be executed separately
 
-      **Your responsibilities:**
-      - Execute only the tasks assigned to you
-      - Follow all deviation rules and authentication gate protocols
-      - Track deviations for later Summary
-      - DO NOT create SUMMARY.md (will be created after all segments complete)
-      - DO NOT commit (will be done after all segments complete)
 
-      **Report back:**
-      - Tasks completed
-      - Files created/modified
-      - Deviations encountered
-      - Any issues or blockers"
-
-      **After Task tool returns with agent_id:**
-
-      1. write agent_id to current-agent-id.txt:
-         echo "[agent_id]" > .planning/current-agent-id.txt
-
-      2. Append spawn entry to agent-history.json:
-         {
-           "agent_id": "[agent_id from Task response]",
-           "task_description": "Execute tasks [X-Y] from plan {phase}-{plan}",
-           "phase": "{phase}",
-           "plan": "{plan}",
-           "segment": [segment_number],
-           "timestamp": "[ISO timestamp]",
-           "status": "spawned",
-           "completion_timestamp": null
-         }
-
-      Wait for subagent to complete
-      Capture results (files changed, deviations, etc.)
-
-      **After subagent completes successfully:**
-
-      1. Update agent-history.json entry:
-         - Find entry with matching agent_id
-         - Set status: "completed"
-         - Set completion_timestamp: "[ISO timestamp]"
-
-      2. Clear current-agent-id.txt:
-         rm .planning/current-agent-id.txt
-
-      ```
-
-   C. If routing = Main context:
-      Execute tasks in main using standard execution flow (step name="execute")
-      Track results locally
-
-   D. After segment completes (whether subagent or main):
-      Continue to next checkpoint/segment
-
-3. After ALL segments complete:
-
-   A. Aggregate results from all segments:
-      - Collect files created/modified from all segments
-      - Collect deviations from all segments
-      - Collect decisions from all checkpoints
-      - Merge into complete picture
-
-   B. Create SUMMARY.md:
-      - Use aggregated results
-      - Document all work from all segments
-      - Include deviations from all segments
-      - Note which segments were subagented
-
-   C. Commit:
-      - Stage all files from all segments
-      - Stage SUMMARY.md
-      - Commit with message following plan guidance
-      - Include note about segmented execution if relevant
-
-   D. Report completion
-
-**Example execution trace:**
-
-````
-
-Plan: 01-02-PLAN.md (8 tasks, 2 verify checkpoints)
-
-Parsing segments...
-
-- Segment 1: Tasks 1-3 (autonomous)
-- Checkpoint 4: human-verify
-- Segment 2: Tasks 5-6 (autonomous)
-- Checkpoint 7: human-verify
-- Segment 3: Task 8 (autonomous)
-
-Routing analysis:
-
-- Segment 1: No prior checkpoint → SUBAGENT ✓
-- Checkpoint 4: Verify only → MAIN (required)
-- Segment 2: After verify → SUBAGENT ✓
-- Checkpoint 7: Verify only → MAIN (required)
-- Segment 3: After verify → SUBAGENT ✓
-
-Execution:
-[1] Spawning subagent for tasks 1-3...
-→ Subagent completes: 3 files modified, 0 deviations
-[2] Executing checkpoint 4 (human-verify)...
-╔═══════════════════════════════════════════════════════╗
-║  CHECKPOINT: Verification Required                    ║
-╚═══════════════════════════════════════════════════════╝
-
-Progress: 3/8 tasks complete
-Task: Verify database schema
-
-Built: User and Session tables with relations
-
-How to verify:
-  1. Check src/db/schema.ts for correct types
-
-────────────────────────────────────────────────────────
-→ YOUR ACTION: Type "approved" or describe issues
-────────────────────────────────────────────────────────
-User: "approved"
-[3] Spawning subagent for tasks 5-6...
-→ Subagent completes: 2 files modified, 1 deviation (added error handling)
-[4] Executing checkpoint 7 (human-verify)...
-User: "approved"
-[5] Spawning subagent for task 8...
-→ Subagent completes: 1 file modified, 0 deviations
-
-Aggregating results...
-
-- Total files: 6 modified
-- Total deviations: 1
-- Segmented execution: 3 subagents, 2 checkpoints
-
-Creating SUMMARY.md...
-Committing...
-✓ Complete
-
-````
-
-**Benefits of this pattern:**
-- Main context usage: ~20% (just orchestration + checkpoints)
-- Subagent 1: Fresh 0-30% (tasks 1-3)
-- Subagent 2: Fresh 0-30% (tasks 5-6)
-- Subagent 3: Fresh 0-20% (task 8)
-- All autonomous work: Peak quality
-- Can handle large plans with many tasks if properly segmented
-
-**When NOT to use segmentation:**
-- Plan has decision/human-action checkpoints that affect following tasks
-- Following tasks depend on checkpoint outcome
-- Better to execute in main sequentially in those cases
 </step>
 
 <step name="load_prompt">
-read the plan prompt:
 ```bash
 cat .planning/phases/XX-name/{phase}-{plan}-PLAN.md
-````
-
-This IS the execution instructions. Follow it exactly.
-
-**If plan references CONTEXT.md:**
-The CONTEXT.md file provides the user's vision for this phase — how they imagine it working, what's essential, and what's out of scope. Honor this context throughout execution.
+```
+This IS the execution instructions. Follow exactly. If plan references CONTEXT.md: honor user's vision throughout.
 </step>
 
 <step name="previous_phase_check">
-Before executing, check if previous phase had issues:
-
 ```bash
-# Find previous phase summary
-ls .planning/phases/*/SUMMARY.md 2>/dev/null | sort -r | head -2 | tail -1
+node ~/.config/opencode/get-shit-done/bin/gsd-tools.cjs phases list --type summaries --raw
+# Extract the second-to-last summary from the JSON result
 ```
-
-If previous phase SUMMARY.md has "Issues Encountered" != "None" or "Next Phase Readiness" mentions blockers:
-
-Use question:
-
-- header: "Previous Issues"
-- question: "Previous phase had unresolved items: [summary]. How to proceed?"
-- options:
-  - "Proceed anyway" - Issues won't block this phase
-  - "Address first" - Let's resolve before continuing
-  - "Review previous" - Show me the full summary
-    </step>
+If previous SUMMARY has unresolved "Issues Encountered" or "Next Phase Readiness" blockers: question(header="Previous Issues", options: "Proceed anyway" | "Address first" | "Review previous").
+</step>
 
 <step name="execute">
-Execute each task in the prompt. **Deviations are normal** - handle them automatically using embedded rules below.
-
-1. read the @context files listed in the prompt
-
-2. For each task:
-
-   **If `type="auto"`:**
-
-   **Before executing:** Check if task has `tdd="true"` attribute:
-   - If yes: Follow TDD execution flow (see `<tdd_execution>`) - RED → GREEN → REFACTOR cycle with atomic commits per stage
-   - If no: Standard implementation
-
-   - Work toward task completion
-   - **If CLI/API returns authentication error:** Handle as authentication gate (see below)
-   - **When you discover additional work not in plan:** Apply deviation rules (see below) automatically
-   - Continue implementing, applying rules as needed
-   - Run the verification
-   - Confirm done criteria met
-   - **Commit the task** (see `<task_commit>` below)
-   - Track task completion and commit hash for Summary documentation
-   - Continue to next task
-
-   **If `type="checkpoint:*"`:**
-
-   - STOP immediately (do not continue to next task)
-   - Execute checkpoint_protocol (see below)
-   - Wait for user response
-   - Verify if possible (check files, env vars, etc.)
-   - Only after user confirmation: continue to next task
-
-3. Run overall verification checks from `<verification>` section
-4. Confirm all success criteria from `<success_criteria>` section met
-5. Document all deviations in Summary (automatic - see deviation_documentation below)
-   </step>
+Deviations are normal — handle via rules below.
+
+1. read @context files from prompt
+2. Per task:
+   - `type="auto"`: if `tdd="true"` → TDD execution. Implement with deviation rules + auth gates. Verify done criteria. Commit (see task_commit). Track hash for Summary.
+   - `type="checkpoint:*"`: STOP → checkpoint_protocol → wait for user → continue only after confirmation.
+3. Run `<verification>` checks
+4. Confirm `<success_criteria>` met
+5. Document deviations in Summary
+</step>
 
 <authentication_gates>
 
-## Handling Authentication Errors During Execution
-
-**When you encounter authentication errors during `type="auto"` task execution:**
-
-This is NOT a failure. Authentication gates are expected and normal. Handle them dynamically:
-
-**Authentication error indicators:**
-
-- CLI returns: "Error: Not authenticated", "Not logged in", "Unauthorized", "401", "403"
-- API returns: "Authentication required", "Invalid API key", "Missing credentials"
-- Command fails with: "Please run {tool} login" or "Set {ENV_VAR} environment variable"
-
-**Authentication gate protocol:**
-
-1. **Recognize it's an auth gate** - Not a bug, just needs credentials
-2. **STOP current task execution** - Don't retry repeatedly
-3. **Create dynamic checkpoint:human-action** - Present it to user immediately
-4. **Provide exact authentication steps** - CLI commands, where to get keys
-5. **Wait for user to authenticate** - Let them complete auth flow
-6. **Verify authentication works** - Test that credentials are valid
-7. **Retry the original task** - Resume automation where you left off
-8. **Continue normally** - Don't treat this as an error in Summary
-
-**Example: Vercel deployment hits auth error**
-
-```
-Task 3: Deploy to Vercel
-Running: vercel --yes
-
-Error: Not authenticated. Please run 'vercel login'
-
-[Create checkpoint dynamically]
-
-╔═══════════════════════════════════════════════════════╗
-║  CHECKPOINT: Action Required                          ║
-╚═══════════════════════════════════════════════════════╝
-
-Progress: 2/8 tasks complete
-Task: Authenticate Vercel CLI
-
-Attempted: vercel --yes
-Error: Not authenticated
-
-What you need to do:
-  1. Run: vercel login
-  2. Complete browser authentication
-
-I'll verify: vercel whoami returns your account
-
-────────────────────────────────────────────────────────
-→ YOUR ACTION: Type "done" when authenticated
-────────────────────────────────────────────────────────
-
-[Wait for user response]
-
-[User types "done"]
-
-Verifying authentication...
-Running: vercel whoami
-✓ Authenticated as: user@example.com
-
-Retrying deployment...
-Running: vercel --yes
-✓ Deployed to: https://myapp-abc123.vercel.app
-
-Task 3 complete. Continuing to task 4...
-```
-
-**In Summary documentation:**
-
-Document authentication gates as normal flow, not deviations:
-
-```markdown
 ## Authentication Gates
 
-During execution, I encountered authentication requirements:
-
-1. Task 3: Vercel CLI required authentication
-   - Paused for `vercel login`
-   - Resumed after authentication
-   - Deployed successfully
-
-These are normal gates, not errors.
-```
-
-**Key principles:**
-
-- Authentication gates are NOT failures or bugs
-- They're expected interaction points during first-time setup
-- Handle them gracefully and continue automation after unblocked
-- Don't mark tasks as "failed" or "incomplete" due to auth gates
-- Document them as normal flow, separate from deviations
-  </authentication_gates>
-
-<deviation_rules>
-
-## Automatic Deviation Handling
-
-**While executing tasks, you WILL discover work not in the plan.** This is normal.
-
-Apply these rules automatically. Track all deviations for Summary documentation.
-
----
-
-**RULE 1: Auto-fix bugs**
-
-**Trigger:** Code doesn't work as intended (broken behavior, incorrect output, errors)
-
-**Action:** Fix immediately, track for Summary
-
-**Examples:**
-
-- Wrong SQL query returning incorrect data
-- Logic errors (inverted condition, off-by-one, infinite loop)
-- Type errors, null pointer exceptions, undefined references
-- Broken validation (accepts invalid input, rejects valid input)
-- Security vulnerabilities (SQL injection, XSS, CSRF, insecure auth)
-- Race conditions, deadlocks
-- Memory leaks, resource leaks
-
-**Process:**
-
-1. Fix the bug inline
-2. Add/update tests to prevent regression
-3. Verify fix works
-4. Continue task
-5. Track in deviations list: `[Rule 1 - Bug] [description]`
-
-**No user permission needed.** Bugs must be fixed for correct operation.
-
----
-
-**RULE 2: Auto-add missing critical functionality**
-
-**Trigger:** Code is missing essential features for correctness, security, or basic operation
-
-**Action:** Add immediately, track for Summary
-
-**Examples:**
-
-- Missing error handling (no try/catch, unhandled promise rejections)
-- No input validation (accepts malicious data, type coercion issues)
-- Missing null/undefined checks (crashes on edge cases)
-- No authentication on protected routes
-- Missing authorization checks (users can access others' data)
-- No CSRF protection, missing CORS configuration
-- No rate limiting on public APIs
-- Missing required database indexes (causes timeouts)
-- No logging for errors (can't debug production)
-
-**Process:**
+Auth errors during execution are NOT failures — they're expected interaction points.
 
-1. Add the missing functionality inline
-2. Add tests for the new functionality
-3. Verify it works
-4. Continue task
-5. Track in deviations list: `[Rule 2 - Missing Critical] [description]`
+**Indicators:** "Not authenticated", "Unauthorized", 401/403, "Please run {tool} login", "Set {ENV_VAR}"
 
-**Critical = required for correct/secure/performant operation**
-**No user permission needed.** These are not "features" - they're requirements for basic correctness.
+**Protocol:**
+1. Recognize auth gate (not a bug)
+2. STOP task execution
+3. Create dynamic checkpoint:human-action with exact auth steps
+4. Wait for user to authenticate
+5. Verify credentials work
+6. Retry original task
+7. Continue normally
 
----
+**Example:** `vercel --yes` → "Not authenticated" → checkpoint asking user to `vercel login` → verify with `vercel whoami` → retry deploy → continue
 
-**RULE 3: Auto-fix blocking issues**
+**In Summary:** Document as normal flow under "## Authentication Gates", not as deviations.
 
-**Trigger:** Something prevents you from completing current task
+</authentication_gates>
 
-**Action:** Fix immediately to unblock, track for Summary
-
-**Examples:**
-
-- Missing dependency (package not installed, import fails)
-- Wrong types blocking compilation
-- Broken import paths (file moved, wrong relative path)
-- Missing environment variable (app won't start)
-- Database connection config error
-- Build configuration error (webpack, tsconfig, etc.)
-- Missing file referenced in code
-- Circular dependency blocking module resolution
-
-**Process:**
-
-1. Fix the blocking issue
-2. Verify task can now proceed
-3. Continue task
-4. Track in deviations list: `[Rule 3 - Blocking] [description]`
-
-**No user permission needed.** Can't complete task without fixing blocker.
-
----
-
-**RULE 4: Ask about architectural changes**
-
-**Trigger:** Fix/addition requires significant structural modification
-
-**Action:** STOP, present to user, wait for decision
-
-**Examples:**
+<deviation_rules>
 
-- Adding new database table (not just column)
-- Major schema changes (changing primary key, splitting tables)
-- Introducing new service layer or architectural pattern
-- Switching libraries/frameworks (React → Vue, REST → GraphQL)
-- Changing authentication approach (sessions → JWT)
-- Adding new infrastructure (message queue, cache layer, CDN)
-- Changing API contracts (breaking changes to endpoints)
-- Adding new deployment environment
+## Deviation Rules
 
-**Process:**
+You WILL discover unplanned work. Apply automatically, track all for Summary.
 
-1. STOP current task
-2. Present clearly:
+| Rule | Trigger | Action | Permission |
+|------|---------|--------|------------|
+| **1: Bug** | Broken behavior, errors, wrong queries, type errors, security vulns, race conditions, leaks | Fix → test → verify → track `[Rule 1 - Bug]` | Auto |
+| **2: Missing Critical** | Missing essentials: error handling, validation, auth, CSRF/CORS, rate limiting, indexes, logging | Add → test → verify → track `[Rule 2 - Missing Critical]` | Auto |
+| **3: Blocking** | Prevents completion: missing deps, wrong types, broken imports, missing env/config/files, circular deps | Fix blocker → verify proceeds → track `[Rule 3 - Blocking]` | Auto |
+| **4: Architectural** | Structural change: new DB table, schema change, new service, switching libs, breaking API, new infra | STOP → present decision (below) → track `[Rule 4 - Architectural]` | Ask user |
 
+**Rule 4 format:**
 ```
 ⚠️ Architectural Decision Needed
 
 Current task: [task name]
-Discovery: [what you found that prompted this]
-Proposed change: [architectural modification]
+Discovery: [what prompted this]
+Proposed change: [modification]
 Why needed: [rationale]
-Impact: [what this affects - APIs, deployment, dependencies, etc.]
-Alternatives: [other approaches, or "none apparent"]
+Impact: [what this affects]
+Alternatives: [other approaches]
 
 Proceed with proposed change? (yes / different approach / defer)
 ```
 
-3. WAIT for user response
-4. If approved: implement, track as `[Rule 4 - Architectural] [description]`
-5. If different approach: discuss and implement
-6. If deferred: note in Summary and continue without change
-
-**User decision required.** These changes affect system design.
-
----
-
-**RULE PRIORITY (when multiple could apply):**
-
-1. **If Rule 4 applies** → STOP and ask (architectural decision)
-2. **If Rules 1-3 apply** → Fix automatically, track for Summary
-3. **If genuinely unsure which rule** → Apply Rule 4 (ask user)
-
-**Edge case guidance:**
-
-- "This validation is missing" → Rule 2 (critical for security)
-- "This crashes on null" → Rule 1 (bug)
-- "Need to add table" → Rule 4 (architectural)
-- "Need to add column" → Rule 1 or 2 (depends: fixing bug or adding critical field)
-
-**When in doubt:** Ask yourself "Does this affect correctness, security, or ability to complete task?"
-
-- YES → Rules 1-3 (fix automatically)
-- MAYBE → Rule 4 (ask user)
+**Priority:** Rule 4 (STOP) > Rules 1-3 (auto) > unsure → Rule 4
+**Edge cases:** missing validation → R2 | null crash → R1 | new table → R4 | new column → R1/2
+**Heuristic:** Affects correctness/security/completion? → R1-3. Maybe? → R4.
 
 </deviation_rules>
 
 <deviation_documentation>
 
-## Documenting Deviations in Summary
-
-After all tasks complete, Summary MUST include deviations section.
-
-**If no deviations:**
-
-```markdown
-## Deviations from Plan
-
-None - plan executed exactly as written.
-```
-
-**If deviations occurred:**
-
-```markdown
-## Deviations from Plan
-
-### Auto-fixed Issues
-
-**1. [Rule 1 - Bug] Fixed case-sensitive email uniqueness constraint**
+## Documenting Deviations
 
-- **Found during:** Task 4 (Follow/unfollow API implementation)
-- **Issue:** User.email unique constraint was case-sensitive - Test@example.com and test@example.com were both allowed, causing duplicate accounts
-- **Fix:** Changed to `CREATE UNIQUE INDEX users_email_unique ON users (LOWER(email))`
-- **Files modified:** src/models/User.ts, migrations/003_fix_email_unique.sql
-- **Verification:** Unique constraint test passes - duplicate emails properly rejected
-- **Commit:** abc123f
+Summary MUST include deviations section. None? → `## Deviations from Plan\n\nNone - plan executed exactly as written.`
 
-**2. [Rule 2 - Missing Critical] Added JWT expiry validation to auth middleware**
-
-- **Found during:** Task 3 (Protected route implementation)
-- **Issue:** Auth middleware wasn't checking token expiry - expired tokens were being accepted
-- **Fix:** Added exp claim validation in middleware, reject with 401 if expired
-- **Files modified:** src/middleware/auth.ts, src/middleware/auth.test.ts
-- **Verification:** Expired token test passes - properly rejects with 401
-- **Commit:** def456g
-
----
-
-**Total deviations:** 4 auto-fixed (1 bug, 1 missing critical, 1 blocking, 1 architectural with approval)
-**Impact on plan:** All auto-fixes necessary for correctness/security/performance. No scope creep.
-```
+Per deviation: **[Rule N - Category] Title** — Found during: task X | Issue | Fix | Files modified | Verification | Commit hash
 
-**This provides complete transparency:**
-
-- Every deviation documented
-- Why it was needed
-- What rule applied
-- What was done
-- User can see exactly what happened beyond the plan
+End with: **Total deviations:** N auto-fixed (breakdown). **Impact:** assessment.
 
 </deviation_documentation>
 
 <tdd_plan_execution>
-## TDD Plan Execution
-
-When executing a plan with `type: tdd` in frontmatter, follow the RED-GREEN-REFACTOR cycle for the single feature defined in the plan.
-
-**1. Check test infrastructure (if first TDD plan):**
-If no test framework configured:
-- Detect project type from package.json/requirements.txt/etc.
-- Install minimal test framework (Jest, pytest, Go testing, etc.)
-- Create test config file
-- Verify: run empty test suite
-- This is part of the RED phase, not a separate task
-
-**2. RED - write failing test:**
-- read `<behavior>` element for test specification
-- Create test file if doesn't exist (follow project conventions)
-- write test(s) that describe expected behavior
-- Run tests - MUST fail (if passes, test is wrong or feature exists)
-- Commit: `test({phase}-{plan}): add failing test for [feature]`
-
-**3. GREEN - Implement to pass:**
-- read `<implementation>` element for guidance
-- write minimal code to make test pass
-- Run tests - MUST pass
-- Commit: `feat({phase}-{plan}): implement [feature]`
-
-**4. REFACTOR (if needed):**
-- Clean up code if obvious improvements
-- Run tests - MUST still pass
-- Commit only if changes made: `refactor({phase}-{plan}): clean up [feature]`
-
-**Commit pattern for TDD plans:**
-Each TDD plan produces 2-3 atomic commits:
-1. `test({phase}-{plan}): add failing test for X`
-2. `feat({phase}-{plan}): implement X`
-3. `refactor({phase}-{plan}): clean up X` (optional)
-
-**Error handling:**
-- If test doesn't fail in RED phase: Test is wrong or feature already exists. Investigate before proceeding.
-- If test doesn't pass in GREEN phase: Debug implementation, keep iterating until green.
-- If tests fail in REFACTOR phase: Undo refactor, commit was premature.
-
-**Verification:**
-After TDD plan completion, ensure:
-- All tests pass
-- Test coverage for the new behavior exists
-- No unrelated tests broken
-
-**Why TDD uses dedicated plans:** TDD requires 2-3 execution cycles (RED → GREEN → REFACTOR), each with file reads, test runs, and potential debugging. This consumes 40-50% of context for a single feature. Dedicated plans ensure full quality throughout the cycle.
-
-**Comparison:**
-- Standard plans: Multiple tasks, 1 commit per task, 2-4 commits total
-- TDD plans: Single feature, 2-3 commits for RED/GREEN/REFACTOR cycle
-
-See `~/.config/opencode/get-shit-done/references/tdd.md` for TDD plan structure.
-</tdd_plan_execution>
+## TDD Execution
 
-<task_commit>
-## Task Commit Protocol
+For `type: tdd` plans — RED-GREEN-REFACTOR:
 
-After each task completes (verification passed, done criteria met), commit immediately:
+1. **Infrastructure** (first TDD plan only): detect project, install framework, config, verify empty suite
+2. **RED:** read `<behavior>` → failing test(s) → run (MUST fail) → commit: `test({phase}-{plan}): add failing test for [feature]`
+3. **GREEN:** read `<implementation>` → minimal code → run (MUST pass) → commit: `feat({phase}-{plan}): implement [feature]`
+4. **REFACTOR:** Clean up → tests MUST pass → commit: `refactor({phase}-{plan}): clean up [feature]`
 
-**1. Identify modified files:**
+Errors: RED doesn't fail → investigate test/existing feature. GREEN doesn't pass → debug, iterate. REFACTOR breaks → undo.
 
-Track files changed during this specific task (not the entire plan):
+See `~/.config/opencode/get-shit-done/references/tdd.md` for structure.
+</tdd_plan_execution>
 
-```bash
-git status --short
-```
+<task_commit>
+## task Commit Protocol
 
-**2. Stage only task-related files:**
+After each task (verification passed, done criteria met), commit immediately.
 
-Stage each file individually (NEVER use `git add .` or `git add -A`):
+**1. Check:** `git status --short`
 
+**2. Stage individually** (NEVER `git add .` or `git add -A`):
 ```bash
-# Example - adjust to actual files modified by this task
 git add src/api/auth.ts
 git add src/types/user.ts
 ```
 
-**3. Determine commit type:**
-
-| Type | When to Use | Example |
-|------|-------------|---------|
-| `feat` | New feature, endpoint, component, functionality | feat(08-02): create user registration endpoint |
-| `fix` | Bug fix, error correction | fix(08-02): correct email validation regex |
-| `test` | Test-only changes (TDD RED phase) | test(08-02): add failing test for password hashing |
-| `refactor` | Code cleanup, no behavior change (TDD REFACTOR phase) | refactor(08-02): extract validation to helper |
-| `perf` | Performance improvement | perf(08-02): add database index for user lookups |
-| `docs` | Documentation changes | docs(08-02): add API endpoint documentation |
-| `style` | Formatting, linting fixes | style(08-02): format auth module |
-| `chore` | Config, tooling, dependencies | chore(08-02): add bcrypt dependency |
+**3. Commit type:**
 
-**4. Craft commit message:**
+| Type | When | Example |
+|------|------|---------|
+| `feat` | New functionality | feat(08-02): create user registration endpoint |
+| `fix` | Bug fix | fix(08-02): correct email validation regex |
+| `test` | Test-only (TDD RED) | test(08-02): add failing test for password hashing |
+| `refactor` | No behavior change (TDD REFACTOR) | refactor(08-02): extract validation to helper |
+| `perf` | Performance | perf(08-02): add database index |
+| `docs` | Documentation | docs(08-02): add API docs |
+| `style` | Formatting | style(08-02): format auth module |
+| `chore` | Config/deps | chore(08-02): add bcrypt dependency |
 
-Format: `{type}({phase}-{plan}): {task-name-or-description}`
-
-```bash
-git commit -m "{type}({phase}-{plan}): {concise task description}
-
-- {key change 1}
-- {key change 2}
-- {key change 3}
-"
-```
-
-**Examples:**
-
-```bash
-# Standard plan task
-git commit -m "feat(08-02): create user registration endpoint
-
-- POST /auth/register validates email and password
-- Checks for duplicate users
-- Returns JWT token on success
-"
-
-# Another standard task
-git commit -m "fix(08-02): correct email validation regex
-
-- Fixed regex to accept plus-addressing
-- Added tests for edge cases
-"
-```
-
-**Note:** TDD plans have their own commit pattern (test/feat/refactor for RED/GREEN/REFACTOR phases). See `<tdd_plan_execution>` section above.
-
-**5. Record commit hash:**
-
-After committing, capture hash for SUMMARY.md:
+**4. Format:** `{type}({phase}-{plan}): {description}` with bullet points for key changes.
 
+**5. Record hash:**
 ```bash
 TASK_COMMIT=$(git rev-parse --short HEAD)
-echo "Task ${TASK_NUM} committed: ${TASK_COMMIT}"
+TASK_COMMITS+=("task ${TASK_NUM}: ${TASK_COMMIT}")
 ```
 
-Store in array or list for SUMMARY generation:
-```bash
-TASK_COMMITS+=("Task ${TASK_NUM}: ${TASK_COMMIT}")
-```
-
-**Atomic commit benefits:**
-- Each task independently revertable
-- Git bisect finds exact failing task
-- Git blame traces line to specific task context
-- Clear history for OpenCode in future sessions
-- Better observability for AI-automated workflow
-
 </task_commit>
 
 <step name="checkpoint_protocol">
-When encountering `type="checkpoint:*"`:
-
-**Critical: OpenCode automates everything with CLI/API before checkpoints.** Checkpoints are for verification and decisions, not manual work.
-
-**Display checkpoint clearly:**
-
-```
-╔═══════════════════════════════════════════════════════╗
-║  CHECKPOINT: [Type]                                   ║
-╚═══════════════════════════════════════════════════════╝
-
-Progress: {X}/{Y} tasks complete
-Task: [task name]
+On `type="checkpoint:*"`: automate everything possible first. Checkpoints are for verification/decisions only.
 
-[Display task-specific content based on type]
+Display: `CHECKPOINT: [Type]` box → Progress {X}/{Y} → task name → type-specific content → `YOUR ACTION: [signal]`
 
-────────────────────────────────────────────────────────
-→ YOUR ACTION: [Resume signal instruction]
-────────────────────────────────────────────────────────
-```
-
-**For checkpoint:human-verify (90% of checkpoints):**
-
-```
-Built: [what was automated - deployed, built, configured]
-
-How to verify:
-  1. [Step 1 - exact command/URL]
-  2. [Step 2 - what to check]
-  3. [Step 3 - expected behavior]
-
-────────────────────────────────────────────────────────
-→ YOUR ACTION: Type "approved" or describe issues
-────────────────────────────────────────────────────────
-```
-
-**For checkpoint:decision (9% of checkpoints):**
-
-```
-Decision needed: [decision]
-
-Context: [why this matters]
-
-Options:
-1. [option-id]: [name]
-   Pros: [pros]
-   Cons: [cons]
-
-2. [option-id]: [name]
-   Pros: [pros]
-   Cons: [cons]
-
-[Resume signal - e.g., "Select: option-id"]
-```
-
-**For checkpoint:human-action (1% - rare, only for truly unavoidable manual steps):**
+| Type | Content | Resume signal |
+|------|---------|---------------|
+| human-verify (90%) | What was built + verification steps (commands/URLs) | "approved" or describe issues |
+| decision (9%) | Decision needed + context + options with pros/cons | "Select: option-id" |
+| human-action (1%) | What was automated + ONE manual step + verification plan | "done" |
 
-```
-I automated: [what OpenCode already did via CLI/API]
-
-Need your help with: [the ONE thing with no CLI/API - email link, 2FA code]
-
-Instructions:
-[Single unavoidable step]
-
-I'll verify after: [verification]
-
-[Resume signal - e.g., "Type 'done' when complete"]
-```
-
-**After displaying:** WAIT for user response. Do NOT hallucinate completion. Do NOT continue to next task.
-
-**After user responds:**
+After response: verify if specified. Pass → continue. Fail → inform, wait. WAIT for user — do NOT hallucinate completion.
 
-- Run verification if specified (file exists, env var set, tests pass, etc.)
-- If verification passes or N/A: continue to next task
-- If verification fails: inform user, wait for resolution
-
-See ~/.config/opencode/get-shit-done/references/checkpoints.md for complete checkpoint guidance.
+See ~/.config/opencode/get-shit-done/references/checkpoints.md for details.
 </step>
 
 <step name="checkpoint_return_for_orchestrator">
-**When spawned by an orchestrator (execute-phase or execute-plan command):**
-
-If you were spawned via Task tool and hit a checkpoint, you cannot directly interact with the user. Instead, RETURN to the orchestrator with structured checkpoint state so it can present to the user and spawn a fresh continuation agent.
-
-**Return format for checkpoints:**
-
-**Required in your return:**
-
-1. **Completed Tasks table** - Tasks done so far with commit hashes and files created
-2. **Current Task** - Which task you're on and what's blocking it
-3. **Checkpoint Details** - User-facing content (verification steps, decision options, or action instructions)
-4. **Awaiting** - What you need from the user
-
-**Example return:**
-
-```
-## CHECKPOINT REACHED
+When spawned via task and hitting checkpoint: return structured state (cannot interact with user directly).
 
-**Type:** human-action
-**Plan:** 01-01
-**Progress:** 1/3 tasks complete
+**Required return:** 1) Completed Tasks table (hashes + files) 2) Current task (what's blocking) 3) Checkpoint Details (user-facing content) 4) Awaiting (what's needed from user)
 
-### Completed Tasks
-
-| Task | Name | Commit | Files |
-|------|------|--------|-------|
-| 1 | Initialize Next.js 15 project | d6fe73f | package.json, tsconfig.json, app/ |
-
-### Current Task
-
-**Task 2:** Initialize Convex backend
-**Status:** blocked
-**Blocked by:** Convex CLI authentication required
-
-### Checkpoint Details
-
-**Automation attempted:**
-Ran `npx convex dev` to initialize Convex backend
-
-**Error encountered:**
-"Error: Not authenticated. Run `npx convex login` first."
-
-**What you need to do:**
-1. Run: `npx convex login`
-2. Complete browser authentication
-3. Run: `npx convex dev`
-4. Create project when prompted
-
-**I'll verify after:**
-`cat .env.local | grep CONVEX` returns the Convex URL
-
-### Awaiting
-
-Type "done" when Convex is authenticated and project created.
-```
-
-**After you return:**
-
-The orchestrator will:
-1. Parse your structured return
-2. Present checkpoint details to the user
-3. Collect user's response
-4. Spawn a FRESH continuation agent with your completed tasks state
-
-You will NOT be resumed. A new agent continues from where you stopped, using your Completed Tasks table to know what's done.
-
-**How to know if you were spawned:**
-
-If you're reading this workflow because an orchestrator spawned you (vs running directly), the orchestrator's prompt will include checkpoint return instructions. Follow those instructions when you hit a checkpoint.
-
-**If running in main context (not spawned):**
-
-Use the standard checkpoint_protocol - display checkpoint and wait for direct user response.
+Orchestrator parses → presents to user → spawns fresh continuation with your completed tasks state. You will NOT be resumed. In main context: use checkpoint_protocol above.
 </step>
 
 <step name="verification_failure_gate">
-If any task verification fails:
-
-STOP. Do not continue to next task.
-
-Present inline:
-"Verification failed for Task [X]: [task name]
-
-Expected: [verification criteria]
-Actual: [what happened]
-
-How to proceed?
-
-1. Retry - Try the task again
-2. Skip - Mark as incomplete, continue
-3. Stop - Pause execution, investigate"
-
-Wait for user decision.
-
-If user chose "Skip", note it in SUMMARY.md under "Issues Encountered".
+If verification fails: STOP. Present: "Verification failed for task [X]: [name]. Expected: [criteria]. Actual: [result]." Options: Retry | Skip (mark incomplete) | Stop (investigate). If skipped → SUMMARY "Issues Encountered".
 </step>
 
 <step name="record_completion_time">
-Record execution end time and calculate duration:
-
 ```bash
 PLAN_END_TIME=$(date -u +"%Y-%m-%dT%H:%M:%SZ")
 PLAN_END_EPOCH=$(date +%s)
@@ -1275,588 +303,131 @@ else
   DURATION="${DURATION_MIN} min"
 fi
 ```
-
-Pass timing data to SUMMARY.md creation.
 </step>
 
 <step name="generate_user_setup">
-**Generate USER-SETUP.md if plan has user_setup in frontmatter.**
-
-Check PLAN.md frontmatter for `user_setup` field:
-
 ```bash
 grep -A 50 "^user_setup:" .planning/phases/XX-name/{phase}-{plan}-PLAN.md | head -50
 ```
 
-**If user_setup exists and is not empty:**
-
-Create `.planning/phases/XX-name/{phase}-USER-SETUP.md` using template from `~/.config/opencode/get-shit-done/templates/user-setup.md`.
-
-**Content generation:**
-
-1. Parse each service in `user_setup` array
-2. For each service, generate sections:
-   - Environment Variables table (from `env_vars`)
-   - Account Setup checklist (from `account_setup`, if present)
-   - Dashboard Configuration steps (from `dashboard_config`, if present)
-   - Local Development notes (from `local_dev`, if present)
-3. Add verification section with commands to confirm setup works
-4. Set status to "Incomplete"
-
-**Example output:**
-
-```markdown
-# Phase 10: User Setup Required
-
-**Generated:** 2025-01-14
-**Phase:** 10-monetization
-**Status:** Incomplete
-
-## Environment Variables
-
-| Status | Variable | Source | Add to |
-|--------|----------|--------|--------|
-| [ ] | `STRIPE_SECRET_KEY` | Stripe Dashboard → Developers → API keys → Secret key | `.env.local` |
-| [ ] | `STRIPE_WEBHOOK_SECRET` | Stripe Dashboard → Developers → Webhooks → Signing secret | `.env.local` |
-
-## Dashboard Configuration
-
-- [ ] **Create webhook endpoint**
-  - Location: Stripe Dashboard → Developers → Webhooks → Add endpoint
-  - Details: URL: https://[your-domain]/api/webhooks/stripe, Events: checkout.session.completed
-
-## Local Development
-
-For local testing:
-\`\`\`bash
-stripe listen --forward-to localhost:3000/api/webhooks/stripe
-\`\`\`
-
-## Verification
-
-[Verification commands based on service]
-
----
-**Once all items complete:** Mark status as "Complete"
-```
-
-**If user_setup is empty or missing:**
-
-Skip this step - no USER-SETUP.md needed.
-
-**Track for offer_next:**
-
-Set `USER_SETUP_CREATED=true` if file was generated, for use in completion messaging.
+If user_setup exists: create `{phase}-USER-SETUP.md` using template `~/.config/opencode/get-shit-done/templates/user-setup.md`. Per service: env vars table, account setup checklist, dashboard config, local dev notes, verification commands. Status "Incomplete". Set `USER_SETUP_CREATED=true`. If empty/missing: skip.
 </step>
 
 <step name="create_summary">
-Create `{phase}-{plan}-SUMMARY.md` as specified in the prompt's `<output>` section.
-Use ~/.config/opencode/get-shit-done/templates/summary.md for structure.
-
-**File location:** `.planning/phases/XX-name/{phase}-{plan}-SUMMARY.md`
-
-**Frontmatter population:**
-
-Before writing summary content, populate frontmatter fields from execution context:
-
-1. **Basic identification:**
-   - phase: From PLAN.md frontmatter
-   - plan: From PLAN.md frontmatter
-   - subsystem: Categorize based on phase focus (auth, payments, ui, api, database, infra, testing, etc.)
-   - tags: Extract tech keywords (libraries, frameworks, tools used)
-
-2. **Dependency graph:**
-   - requires: List prior phases this built upon (check PLAN.md context section for referenced prior summaries)
-   - provides: Extract from accomplishments - what was delivered
-   - affects: Infer from phase description/goal what future phases might need this
-
-3. **Tech tracking:**
-   - tech-stack.added: New libraries from package.json changes or requirements
-   - tech-stack.patterns: Architectural patterns established (from decisions/accomplishments)
+Create `{phase}-{plan}-SUMMARY.md` at `.planning/phases/XX-name/`. Use `~/.config/opencode/get-shit-done/templates/summary.md`.
 
-4. **File tracking:**
-   - key-files.created: From "Files Created/Modified" section
-   - key-files.modified: From "Files Created/Modified" section
+**Frontmatter:** phase, plan, subsystem, tags | requires/provides/affects | tech-stack.added/patterns | key-files.created/modified | key-decisions | requirements-completed (**MUST** copy `requirements` array from PLAN.md frontmatter verbatim) | duration ($DURATION), completed ($PLAN_END_TIME date).
 
-5. **Decisions:**
-   - key-decisions: Extract from "Decisions Made" section
+Title: `# Phase [X] Plan [Y]: [Name] Summary`
 
-6. **Metrics:**
-   - duration: From $DURATION variable
-   - completed: From $PLAN_END_TIME (date only, format YYYY-MM-DD)
+One-liner SUBSTANTIVE: "JWT auth with refresh rotation using jose library" not "Authentication implemented"
 
-Note: If subsystem/affects are unclear, use best judgment based on phase name and accomplishments. Can be refined later.
+Include: duration, start/end times, task count, file count.
 
-**Title format:** `# Phase [X] Plan [Y]: [Name] Summary`
-
-The one-liner must be SUBSTANTIVE:
-
-- Good: "JWT auth with refresh rotation using jose library"
-- Bad: "Authentication implemented"
-
-**Include performance data:**
-
-- Duration: `$DURATION`
-- Started: `$PLAN_START_TIME`
-- Completed: `$PLAN_END_TIME`
-- Tasks completed: (count from execution)
-- Files modified: (count from execution)
-
-**Next Step section:**
-
-- If more plans exist in this phase: "Ready for {phase}-{next-plan}-PLAN.md"
-- If this is the last plan: "Phase complete, ready for transition"
-  </step>
+Next: more plans → "Ready for {next-plan}" | last → "Phase complete, ready for transition".
+</step>
 
 <step name="update_current_position">
-Update Current Position section in STATE.md to reflect plan completion.
-
-**Format:**
+Update STATE.md using gsd-tools:
 
-```markdown
-Phase: [current] of [total] ([phase name])
-Plan: [just completed] of [total in phase]
-Status: [In progress / Phase complete]
-Last activity: [today] - Completed {phase}-{plan}-PLAN.md
-
-Progress: [progress bar]
-```
-
-**Calculate progress bar:**
-
-- Count total plans across all phases (from ROADMAP.md or ROADMAP.md)
-- Count completed plans (count SUMMARY.md files that exist)
-- Progress = (completed / total) × 100%
-- Render: ░ for incomplete, █ for complete
-
-**Example - completing 02-01-PLAN.md (plan 5 of 10 total):**
-
-Before:
-
-```markdown
-## Current Position
-
-Phase: 2 of 4 (Authentication)
-Plan: Not started
-Status: Ready to execute
-Last activity: 2025-01-18 - Phase 1 complete
-
-Progress: ██████░░░░ 40%
-```
-
-After:
-
-```markdown
-## Current Position
+```bash
+# Advance plan counter (handles last-plan edge case)
+node ~/.config/opencode/get-shit-done/bin/gsd-tools.cjs state advance-plan
 
-Phase: 2 of 4 (Authentication)
-Plan: 1 of 2 in current phase
-Status: In progress
-Last activity: 2025-01-19 - Completed 02-01-PLAN.md
+# Recalculate progress bar from disk state
+node ~/.config/opencode/get-shit-done/bin/gsd-tools.cjs state update-progress
 
-Progress: ███████░░░ 50%
+# Record execution metrics
+node ~/.config/opencode/get-shit-done/bin/gsd-tools.cjs state record-metric \
+  --phase "${PHASE}" --plan "${PLAN}" --duration "${DURATION}" \
+  --tasks "${TASK_COUNT}" --files "${FILE_COUNT}"
 ```
-
-**Step complete when:**
-
-- [ ] Phase number shows current phase (X of total)
-- [ ] Plan number shows plans complete in current phase (N of total-in-phase)
-- [ ] Status reflects current state (In progress / Phase complete)
-- [ ] Last activity shows today's date and the plan just completed
-- [ ] Progress bar calculated correctly from total completed plans
-      </step>
+</step>
 
 <step name="extract_decisions_and_issues">
-Extract decisions, issues, and concerns from SUMMARY.md into STATE.md accumulated context.
+From SUMMARY: Extract decisions and add to STATE.md:
 
-**Decisions Made:**
-
-- read SUMMARY.md "## Decisions Made" section
-- If content exists (not "None"):
-  - Add each decision to STATE.md Decisions table
-  - Format: `| [phase number] | [decision summary] | [rationale] |`
-
-**Blockers/Concerns:**
+```bash
+# Add each decision from SUMMARY key-decisions
+node ~/.config/opencode/get-shit-done/bin/gsd-tools.cjs state add-decision \
+  --phase "${PHASE}" --summary "${DECISION_TEXT}" --rationale "${RATIONALE}"
 
-- read SUMMARY.md "## Next Phase Readiness" section
-- If contains blockers or concerns:
-  - Add to STATE.md "Blockers/Concerns Carried Forward"
-    </step>
+# Add blockers if any found
+node ~/.config/opencode/get-shit-done/bin/gsd-tools.cjs state add-blocker "Blocker description"
+```
+</step>
 
 <step name="update_session_continuity">
-Update Session Continuity section in STATE.md to enable resumption in future sessions.
-
-**Format:**
+Update session info using gsd-tools:
 
-```markdown
-Last session: [current date and time]
-Stopped at: Completed {phase}-{plan}-PLAN.md
-Resume file: [path to .continue-here if exists, else "None"]
+```bash
+node ~/.config/opencode/get-shit-done/bin/gsd-tools.cjs state record-session \
+  --stopped-at "Completed ${PHASE}-${PLAN}-PLAN.md" \
+  --resume-file "None"
 ```
 
-**Size constraint note:** Keep STATE.md under 150 lines total.
+Keep STATE.md under 150 lines.
 </step>
 
 <step name="issues_review_gate">
-Before proceeding, check SUMMARY.md content.
-
-If "Issues Encountered" is NOT "None":
-
-<if mode="yolo">
-```
-⚡ Auto-approved: Issues acknowledgment
-⚠️ Note: Issues were encountered during execution:
-- [Issue 1]
-- [Issue 2]
-(Logged - continuing in yolo mode)
-```
-
-Continue without waiting.
-</if>
-
-<if mode="interactive" OR="custom with gates.issues_review true">
-Present issues and wait for acknowledgment before proceeding.
-</if>
+If SUMMARY "Issues Encountered" ≠ "None": yolo → log and continue. Interactive → present issues, wait for acknowledgment.
 </step>
 
 <step name="update_roadmap">
-Update the roadmap file:
-
 ```bash
-ROADMAP_FILE=".planning/ROADMAP.md"
+node ~/.config/opencode/get-shit-done/bin/gsd-tools.cjs roadmap update-plan-progress "${PHASE}"
 ```
-
-**If more plans remain in this phase:**
-
-- Update plan count: "2/3 plans complete"
-- Keep phase status as "In progress"
-
-**If this was the last plan in the phase:**
-
-- Mark phase complete: status → "Complete"
-- Add completion date
+Counts PLAN vs SUMMARY files on disk. Updates progress table row with correct count and status (`In Progress` or `Complete` with date).
 </step>
 
-<step name="git_commit_metadata">
-Commit execution metadata (SUMMARY + STATE + ROADMAP):
-
-**Note:** All task code has already been committed during execution (one commit per task).
-PLAN.md was already committed during plan-phase. This final commit captures execution results only.
-
-**Check planning config:**
-
-If `COMMIT_PLANNING_DOCS=false` (set in load_project_state):
-- Skip all git operations for .planning/ files
-- Planning docs exist locally but are gitignored
-- Log: "Skipping planning docs commit (commit_docs: false)"
-- Proceed to next step
-
-If `COMMIT_PLANNING_DOCS=true` (default):
-- Continue with git operations below
-
-**1. Stage execution artifacts:**
-
-```bash
-git add .planning/phases/XX-name/{phase}-{plan}-SUMMARY.md
-git add .planning/STATE.md
-```
-
-**2. Stage roadmap:**
+<step name="update_requirements">
+Mark completed requirements from the PLAN.md frontmatter `requirements:` field:
 
 ```bash
-git add .planning/ROADMAP.md
+node ~/.config/opencode/get-shit-done/bin/gsd-tools.cjs requirements mark-complete ${REQ_IDS}
 ```
 
-**3. Verify staging:**
-
-```bash
-git status
-# Should show only execution artifacts (SUMMARY, STATE, ROADMAP), no code files
-```
-
-**4. Commit metadata:**
-
-```bash
-git commit -m "$(cat <<'EOF'
-docs({phase}-{plan}): complete [plan-name] plan
-
-Tasks completed: [N]/[N]
-- [Task 1 name]
-- [Task 2 name]
-- [Task 3 name]
-
-SUMMARY: .planning/phases/XX-name/{phase}-{plan}-SUMMARY.md
-EOF
-)"
-```
+Extract requirement IDs from the plan's frontmatter (e.g., `requirements: [AUTH-01, AUTH-02]`). If no requirements field, skip.
+</step>
 
-**Example:**
+<step name="git_commit_metadata">
+task code already committed per-task. Commit plan metadata:
 
 ```bash
-git commit -m "$(cat <<'EOF'
-docs(08-02): complete user registration plan
-
-Tasks completed: 3/3
-- User registration endpoint
-- Password hashing with bcrypt
-- Email confirmation flow
-
-SUMMARY: .planning/phases/08-user-auth/08-02-registration-SUMMARY.md
-EOF
-)"
-```
-
-**Git log after plan execution:**
-
+node ~/.config/opencode/get-shit-done/bin/gsd-tools.cjs commit "docs({phase}-{plan}): complete [plan-name] plan" --files .planning/phases/XX-name/{phase}-{plan}-SUMMARY.md .planning/STATE.md .planning/ROADMAP.md .planning/REQUIREMENTS.md
 ```
-abc123f docs(08-02): complete user registration plan
-def456g feat(08-02): add email confirmation flow
-hij789k feat(08-02): implement password hashing with bcrypt
-lmn012o feat(08-02): create user registration endpoint
-```
-
-Each task has its own commit, followed by one metadata commit documenting plan completion.
-
-See `git-integration.md` (loaded via required_reading) for commit message conventions.
 </step>
 
 <step name="update_codebase_map">
-**If .planning/codebase/ exists:**
-
-Check what changed across all task commits in this plan:
+If .planning/codebase/ doesn't exist: skip.
 
 ```bash
-# Find first task commit (right after previous plan's docs commit)
 FIRST_TASK=$(git log --oneline --grep="feat({phase}-{plan}):" --grep="fix({phase}-{plan}):" --grep="test({phase}-{plan}):" --reverse | head -1 | cut -d' ' -f1)
-
-# Get all changes from first task through now
 git diff --name-only ${FIRST_TASK}^..HEAD 2>/dev/null
 ```
 
-**Update only if structural changes occurred:**
-
-| Change Detected | Update Action |
-|-----------------|---------------|
-| New directory in src/ | STRUCTURE.md: Add to directory layout |
-| package.json deps changed | STACK.md: Add/remove from dependencies list |
-| New file pattern (e.g., first .test.ts) | CONVENTIONS.md: Note new pattern |
-| New external API client | INTEGRATIONS.md: Add service entry with file path |
-| Config file added/changed | STACK.md: Update configuration section |
-| File renamed/moved | Update paths in relevant docs |
-
-**Skip update if only:**
-- Code changes within existing files
-- Bug fixes
-- Content changes (no structural impact)
-
-**Update format:**
-Make single targeted edits - add a bullet point, update a path, or remove a stale entry. Don't rewrite sections.
+Update only structural changes: new src/ dir → STRUCTURE.md | deps → STACK.md | file pattern → CONVENTIONS.md | API client → INTEGRATIONS.md | config → STACK.md | renamed → update paths. Skip code-only/bugfix/content changes.
 
 ```bash
-git add .planning/codebase/*.md
-git commit --amend --no-edit  # Include in metadata commit
+node ~/.config/opencode/get-shit-done/bin/gsd-tools.cjs commit "" --files .planning/codebase/*.md --amend
 ```
-
-**If .planning/codebase/ doesn't exist:**
-Skip this step.
 </step>
 
 <step name="offer_next">
-**MANDATORY: Verify remaining work before presenting next steps.**
-
-Do NOT skip this verification. Do NOT assume phase or milestone completion without checking.
-
-**Step 0: Check for USER-SETUP.md**
-
-If `USER_SETUP_CREATED=true` (from generate_user_setup step), always include this warning block at the TOP of completion output:
-
-```
-⚠️ USER SETUP REQUIRED
-
-This phase introduced external services requiring manual configuration:
-
-📋 .planning/phases/{phase-dir}/{phase}-USER-SETUP.md
-
-Quick view:
-- [ ] {ENV_VAR_1}
-- [ ] {ENV_VAR_2}
-- [ ] {Dashboard config task}
-
-Complete this setup for the integration to function.
-Run `cat .planning/phases/{phase-dir}/{phase}-USER-SETUP.md` for full details.
-
----
-```
-
-This warning appears BEFORE "Plan complete" messaging. User sees setup requirements prominently.
-
-**Step 1: Count plans and summaries in current phase**
-
-List files in the phase directory:
+If `USER_SETUP_CREATED=true`: display `⚠️ USER SETUP REQUIRED` with path + env/config tasks at TOP.
 
 ```bash
 ls -1 .planning/phases/[current-phase-dir]/*-PLAN.md 2>/dev/null | wc -l
 ls -1 .planning/phases/[current-phase-dir]/*-SUMMARY.md 2>/dev/null | wc -l
 ```
 
-State the counts: "This phase has [X] plans and [Y] summaries."
-
-**Step 2: Route based on plan completion**
-
-Compare the counts from Step 1:
-
-| Condition | Meaning | Action |
-|-----------|---------|--------|
-| summaries < plans | More plans remain | Go to **Route A** |
-| summaries = plans | Phase complete | Go to Step 3 |
-
----
-
-**Route A: More plans remain in this phase**
-
-Identify the next unexecuted plan:
-- Find the first PLAN.md file that has no matching SUMMARY.md
-- read its `<objective>` section
-
-<if mode="yolo">
-```
-Plan {phase}-{plan} complete.
-Summary: .planning/phases/{phase-dir}/{phase}-{plan}-SUMMARY.md
-
-{Y} of {X} plans complete for Phase {Z}.
-
-⚡ Auto-continuing: Execute next plan ({phase}-{next-plan})
-```
-
-Loop back to identify_plan step automatically.
-</if>
-
-<if mode="interactive" OR="custom with gates.execute_next_plan true">
-```
-Plan {phase}-{plan} complete.
-Summary: .planning/phases/{phase-dir}/{phase}-{plan}-SUMMARY.md
-
-{Y} of {X} plans complete for Phase {Z}.
-
----
-
-## ▶ Next Up
-
-**{phase}-{next-plan}: [Plan Name]** — [objective from next PLAN.md]
-
-`/gsd-execute-phase {phase}`
-
-*`/new` first → fresh context window*
-
----
-
-**Also available:**
-- `/gsd-verify-work {phase}-{plan}` — manual acceptance testing before continuing
-- Review what was built before continuing
-
----
-```
-
-Wait for user to clear and run next command.
-</if>
-
-**STOP here if Route A applies. Do not continue to Step 3.**
-
----
-
-**Step 3: Check milestone status (only when all plans in phase are complete)**
-
-read ROADMAP.md and extract:
-1. Current phase number (from the plan just completed)
-2. All phase numbers listed in the current milestone section
-
-To find phases in the current milestone, look for:
-- Phase headers: lines starting with `### Phase` or `#### Phase`
-- Phase list items: lines like `- [ ] **Phase X:` or `- [x] **Phase X:`
-
-Count total phases in the current milestone and identify the highest phase number.
-
-State: "Current phase is {X}. Milestone has {N} phases (highest: {Y})."
-
-**Step 4: Route based on milestone status**
-
-| Condition | Meaning | Action |
-|-----------|---------|--------|
-| current phase < highest phase | More phases remain | Go to **Route B** |
-| current phase = highest phase | Milestone complete | Go to **Route C** |
-
----
-
-**Route B: Phase complete, more phases remain in milestone**
-
-read ROADMAP.md to get the next phase's name and goal.
-
-```
-Plan {phase}-{plan} complete.
-Summary: .planning/phases/{phase-dir}/{phase}-{plan}-SUMMARY.md
-
-## ✓ Phase {Z}: {Phase Name} Complete
-
-All {Y} plans finished.
-
----
-
-## ▶ Next Up
-
-**Phase {Z+1}: {Next Phase Name}** — {Goal from ROADMAP.md}
-
-`/gsd-plan-phase {Z+1}`
-
-*`/new` first → fresh context window*
-
----
-
-**Also available:**
-- `/gsd-verify-work {Z}` — manual acceptance testing before continuing
-- `/gsd-discuss-phase {Z+1}` — gather context first
-- Review phase accomplishments before continuing
-
----
-```
-
----
-
-**Route C: Milestone complete (all phases done)**
-
-```
-🎉 MILESTONE COMPLETE!
-
-Plan {phase}-{plan} complete.
-Summary: .planning/phases/{phase-dir}/{phase}-{plan}-SUMMARY.md
-
-## ✓ Phase {Z}: {Phase Name} Complete
-
-All {Y} plans finished.
-
-╔═══════════════════════════════════════════════════════╗
-║  All {N} phases complete! Milestone is 100% done.     ║
-╚═══════════════════════════════════════════════════════╝
-
----
-
-## ▶ Next Up
-
-**Complete Milestone** — archive and prepare for next
-
-`/gsd-complete-milestone`
-
-*`/new` first → fresh context window*
-
----
-
-**Also available:**
-- `/gsd-verify-work` — manual acceptance testing before completing milestone
-- `/gsd-add-phase <description>` — add another phase before completing
-- Review accomplishments before archiving
-
----
-```
+| Condition | Route | Action |
+|-----------|-------|--------|
+| summaries < plans | **A: More plans** | Find next PLAN without SUMMARY. Yolo: auto-continue. Interactive: show next plan, suggest `/gsd-execute-phase {phase}` + `/gsd-verify-work`. STOP here. |
+| summaries = plans, current < highest phase | **B: Phase done** | Show completion, suggest `/gsd-plan-phase {Z+1}` + `/gsd-verify-work {Z}` + `/gsd-discuss-phase {Z+1}` |
+| summaries = plans, current = highest phase | **C: Milestone done** | Show banner, suggest `/gsd-complete-milestone` + `/gsd-verify-work` + `/gsd-add-phase` |
 
+All routes: `/new` first for fresh context.
 </step>
 
 </process>
@@ -1871,4 +442,4 @@ All {Y} plans finished.
 - ROADMAP.md updated
 - If codebase map exists: map updated with execution changes (or skipped if no significant changes)
 - If USER-SETUP.md created: prominently surfaced in completion output
-  </success_criteria>
+</success_criteria>