gsd-code-first 1.0.0

package/get-shit-done/workflows/insert-phase.md

@@ -0,0 +1,130 @@
+<purpose>
+Insert a decimal phase for urgent work discovered mid-milestone between existing integer phases. Uses decimal numbering (72.1, 72.2, etc.) to preserve the logical sequence of planned phases while accommodating urgent insertions without renumbering the entire roadmap.
+</purpose>
+
+<required_reading>
+Read all files referenced by the invoking prompt's execution_context before starting.
+</required_reading>
+
+<process>
+
+<step name="parse_arguments">
+Parse the command arguments:
+- First argument: integer phase number to insert after
+- Remaining arguments: phase description
+
+Example: `/gsd:insert-phase 72 Fix critical auth bug`
+-> after = 72
+-> description = "Fix critical auth bug"
+
+If arguments missing:
+
+```
+ERROR: Both phase number and description required
+Usage: /gsd:insert-phase <after> <description>
+Example: /gsd:insert-phase 72 Fix critical auth bug
+```
+
+Exit.
+
+Validate first argument is an integer.
+</step>
+
+<step name="init_context">
+Load phase operation context:
+
+```bash
+INIT=$(node "$HOME/.claude/get-shit-done/bin/gsd-tools.cjs" init phase-op "${after_phase}")
+if [[ "$INIT" == @file:* ]]; then INIT=$(cat "${INIT#@file:}"); fi
+```
+
+Check `roadmap_exists` from init JSON. If false:
+```
+ERROR: No roadmap found (.planning/ROADMAP.md)
+```
+Exit.
+</step>
+
+<step name="insert_phase">
+**Delegate the phase insertion to gsd-tools:**
+
+```bash
+RESULT=$(node "$HOME/.claude/get-shit-done/bin/gsd-tools.cjs" phase insert "${after_phase}" "${description}")
+```
+
+The CLI handles:
+- Verifying target phase exists in ROADMAP.md
+- Calculating next decimal phase number (checking existing decimals on disk)
+- Generating slug from description
+- Creating the phase directory (`.planning/phases/{N.M}-{slug}/`)
+- Inserting the phase entry into ROADMAP.md after the target phase with (INSERTED) marker
+
+Extract from result: `phase_number`, `after_phase`, `name`, `slug`, `directory`.
+</step>
+
+<step name="update_project_state">
+Update STATE.md to reflect the inserted phase:
+
+1. Read `.planning/STATE.md`
+2. Under "## Accumulated Context" → "### Roadmap Evolution" add entry:
+   ```
+   - Phase {decimal_phase} inserted after Phase {after_phase}: {description} (URGENT)
+   ```
+
+If "Roadmap Evolution" section doesn't exist, create it.
+</step>
+
+<step name="completion">
+Present completion summary:
+
+```
+Phase {decimal_phase} inserted after Phase {after_phase}:
+- Description: {description}
+- Directory: .planning/phases/{decimal-phase}-{slug}/
+- Status: Not planned yet
+- Marker: (INSERTED) - indicates urgent work
+
+Roadmap updated: .planning/ROADMAP.md
+Project state updated: .planning/STATE.md
+
+---
+
+## Next Up
+
+**Phase {decimal_phase}: {description}** -- urgent insertion
+
+`/gsd:plan-phase {decimal_phase}`
+
+<sub>`/clear` first -> fresh context window</sub>
+
+---
+
+**Also available:**
+- Review insertion impact: Check if Phase {next_integer} dependencies still make sense
+- Review roadmap
+
+---
+```
+</step>
+
+</process>
+
+<anti_patterns>
+
+- Don't use this for planned work at end of milestone (use /gsd:add-phase)
+- Don't insert before Phase 1 (decimal 0.1 makes no sense)
+- Don't renumber existing phases
+- Don't modify the target phase content
+- Don't create plans yet (that's /gsd:plan-phase)
+- Don't commit changes (user decides when to commit)
+</anti_patterns>
+
+<success_criteria>
+Phase insertion is complete when:
+
+- [ ] `gsd-tools phase insert` executed successfully
+- [ ] Phase directory created
+- [ ] Roadmap updated with new phase entry (includes "(INSERTED)" marker)
+- [ ] STATE.md updated with roadmap evolution note
+- [ ] User informed of next steps and dependency implications
+</success_criteria>

package/get-shit-done/workflows/list-phase-assumptions.md

@@ -0,0 +1,178 @@
+<purpose>
+Surface Claude's assumptions about a phase before planning, enabling users to correct misconceptions early.
+
+Key difference from discuss-phase: This is ANALYSIS of what Claude thinks, not INTAKE of what user knows. No file output - purely conversational to prompt discussion.
+</purpose>
+
+<process>
+
+<step name="validate_phase" priority="first">
+Phase number: $ARGUMENTS (required)
+
+**If argument missing:**
+
+```
+Error: Phase number required.
+
+Usage: /gsd:list-phase-assumptions [phase-number]
+Example: /gsd:list-phase-assumptions 3
+```
+
+Exit workflow.
+
+**If argument provided:**
+Validate phase exists in roadmap:
+
+```bash
+cat .planning/ROADMAP.md | grep -i "Phase ${PHASE}"
+```
+
+**If phase not found:**
+
+```
+Error: Phase ${PHASE} not found in roadmap.
+
+Available phases:
+[list phases from roadmap]
+```
+
+Exit workflow.
+
+**If phase found:**
+Parse phase details from roadmap:
+
+- Phase number
+- Phase name
+- Phase description/goal
+- Any scope details mentioned
+
+Continue to analyze_phase.
+</step>
+
+<step name="analyze_phase">
+Based on roadmap description and project context, identify assumptions across five areas:
+
+**1. Technical Approach:**
+What libraries, frameworks, patterns, or tools would Claude use?
+- "I'd use X library because..."
+- "I'd follow Y pattern because..."
+- "I'd structure this as Z because..."
+
+**2. Implementation Order:**
+What would Claude build first, second, third?
+- "I'd start with X because it's foundational"
+- "Then Y because it depends on X"
+- "Finally Z because..."
+
+**3. Scope Boundaries:**
+What's included vs excluded in Claude's interpretation?
+- "This phase includes: A, B, C"
+- "This phase does NOT include: D, E, F"
+- "Boundary ambiguities: G could go either way"
+
+**4. Risk Areas:**
+Where does Claude expect complexity or challenges?
+- "The tricky part is X because..."
+- "Potential issues: Y, Z"
+- "I'd watch out for..."
+
+**5. Dependencies:**
+What does Claude assume exists or needs to be in place?
+- "This assumes X from previous phases"
+- "External dependencies: Y, Z"
+- "This will be consumed by..."
+
+Be honest about uncertainty. Mark assumptions with confidence levels:
+- "Fairly confident: ..." (clear from roadmap)
+- "Assuming: ..." (reasonable inference)
+- "Unclear: ..." (could go multiple ways)
+</step>
+
+<step name="present_assumptions">
+Present assumptions in a clear, scannable format:
+
+```
+## My Assumptions for Phase ${PHASE}: ${PHASE_NAME}
+
+### Technical Approach
+[List assumptions about how to implement]
+
+### Implementation Order
+[List assumptions about sequencing]
+
+### Scope Boundaries
+**In scope:** [what's included]
+**Out of scope:** [what's excluded]
+**Ambiguous:** [what could go either way]
+
+### Risk Areas
+[List anticipated challenges]
+
+### Dependencies
+**From prior phases:** [what's needed]
+**External:** [third-party needs]
+**Feeds into:** [what future phases need from this]
+
+---
+
+**What do you think?**
+
+Are these assumptions accurate? Let me know:
+- What I got right
+- What I got wrong
+- What I'm missing
+```
+
+Wait for user response.
+</step>
+
+<step name="gather_feedback">
+**If user provides corrections:**
+
+Acknowledge the corrections:
+
+```
+Key corrections:
+- [correction 1]
+- [correction 2]
+
+This changes my understanding significantly. [Summarize new understanding]
+```
+
+**If user confirms assumptions:**
+
+```
+Assumptions validated.
+```
+
+Continue to offer_next.
+</step>
+
+<step name="offer_next">
+Present next steps:
+
+```
+What's next?
+1. Discuss context (/gsd:discuss-phase ${PHASE}) - Let me ask you questions to build comprehensive context
+2. Plan this phase (/gsd:plan-phase ${PHASE}) - Create detailed execution plans
+3. Re-examine assumptions - I'll analyze again with your corrections
+4. Done for now
+```
+
+Wait for user selection.
+
+If "Discuss context": Note that CONTEXT.md will incorporate any corrections discussed here
+If "Plan this phase": Proceed knowing assumptions are understood
+If "Re-examine": Return to analyze_phase with updated understanding
+</step>
+
+</process>
+
+<success_criteria>
+- Phase number validated against roadmap
+- Assumptions surfaced across five areas: technical approach, implementation order, scope, risks, dependencies
+- Confidence levels marked where appropriate
+- "What do you think?" prompt presented
+- User feedback acknowledged
+- Clear next steps offered
+</success_criteria>

package/get-shit-done/workflows/list-workspaces.md

@@ -0,0 +1,56 @@
+<purpose>
+List all GSD workspaces found in ~/gsd-workspaces/ with their status.
+</purpose>
+
+<required_reading>
+Read all files referenced by the invoking prompt's execution_context before starting.
+</required_reading>
+
+<process>
+
+## 1. Setup
+
+```bash
+INIT=$(node "$HOME/.claude/get-shit-done/bin/gsd-tools.cjs" init list-workspaces)
+if [[ "$INIT" == @file:* ]]; then INIT=$(cat "${INIT#@file:}"); fi
+```
+
+Parse JSON for: `workspace_base`, `workspaces`, `workspace_count`.
+
+## 2. Display
+
+**If `workspace_count` is 0:**
+
+```
+No workspaces found in ~/gsd-workspaces/
+
+Create one with:
+  /gsd:new-workspace --name my-workspace --repos repo1,repo2
+```
+
+Done.
+
+**If workspaces exist:**
+
+Display a table:
+
+```
+GSD Workspaces (~/gsd-workspaces/)
+
+| Name | Repos | Strategy | GSD Project |
+|------|-------|----------|-------------|
+| feature-a | 3 | worktree | Yes |
+| feature-b | 2 | clone | No |
+
+Manage:
+  cd ~/gsd-workspaces/<name>     # Enter a workspace
+  /gsd:remove-workspace <name>   # Remove a workspace
+```
+
+For each workspace, show:
+- **Name** — directory name
+- **Repos** — count from init data
+- **Strategy** — from WORKSPACE.md
+- **GSD Project** — whether `.planning/PROJECT.md` exists (Yes/No)
+
+</process>