gossipcat 0.3.0 → 0.4.1
This diff represents the content of publicly available package versions that have been released to one of the supported registries. The information contained in this diff is provided for informational purposes only and reflects changes between package versions as they appear in their respective public registries.
- package/README.md +1 -1
- package/dist-dashboard/assets/{index-BsDB836W.js → index-QHhaJq-5.js} +17 -17
- package/dist-dashboard/index.html +1 -1
- package/dist-mcp/default-skills/api-design.md +1 -4
- package/dist-mcp/default-skills/code-review.md +1 -12
- package/dist-mcp/default-skills/debugging.md +1 -14
- package/dist-mcp/default-skills/documentation.md +1 -4
- package/dist-mcp/default-skills/implementation.md +1 -4
- package/dist-mcp/default-skills/research.md +1 -17
- package/dist-mcp/default-skills/security-audit.md +1 -14
- package/dist-mcp/default-skills/system-design.md +1 -14
- package/dist-mcp/default-skills/testing.md +1 -4
- package/dist-mcp/default-skills/typescript.md +1 -4
- package/dist-mcp/mcp-server.js +2140 -1023
- package/package.json +1 -1
|
@@ -22,7 +22,7 @@
|
|
|
22
22
|
<link rel="icon" type="image/png" href="/dashboard/favicon.png" />
|
|
23
23
|
<link rel="preconnect" href="https://fonts.googleapis.com" />
|
|
24
24
|
<link href="https://fonts.googleapis.com/css2?family=Inter:wght@400;500;600;700&family=JetBrains+Mono:wght@400;500;600;700&display=swap" rel="stylesheet" />
|
|
25
|
-
<script type="module" crossorigin src="/dashboard/assets/index-
|
|
25
|
+
<script type="module" crossorigin src="/dashboard/assets/index-QHhaJq-5.js"></script>
|
|
26
26
|
<link rel="stylesheet" crossorigin href="/dashboard/assets/index-Bf6FBM2K.css">
|
|
27
27
|
</head>
|
|
28
28
|
<body>
|
|
@@ -19,10 +19,7 @@
|
|
|
19
19
|
7. **Validation** — reject invalid input at the boundary with a 422 and field-level error details
|
|
20
20
|
|
|
21
21
|
## Output Format
|
|
22
|
-
|
|
23
|
-
- List each endpoint: `METHOD /path — purpose`
|
|
24
|
-
- Flag any inconsistencies with REST conventions
|
|
25
|
-
- Note any missing error cases
|
|
22
|
+
Use the FINDING TAG SCHEMA from the system prompt. Do NOT invent skill-specific output formats; they break parsing and cross-review.
|
|
26
23
|
|
|
27
24
|
## Don't
|
|
28
25
|
- Don't return 200 for errors — ever
|
|
@@ -19,18 +19,7 @@
|
|
|
19
19
|
7. Summarize findings at the top before inline comments
|
|
20
20
|
|
|
21
21
|
## Output Format
|
|
22
|
-
|
|
23
|
-
## Summary
|
|
24
|
-
[1-2 sentence overview of the change and overall assessment]
|
|
25
|
-
|
|
26
|
-
## Findings
|
|
27
|
-
- [critical] <file>:<line> — <issue and fix>
|
|
28
|
-
- [warning] <file>:<line> — <issue and suggestion>
|
|
29
|
-
- [style] <file>:<line> — <optional improvement>
|
|
30
|
-
|
|
31
|
-
## Positives
|
|
32
|
-
- [what was done well]
|
|
33
|
-
```
|
|
22
|
+
Use the FINDING TAG SCHEMA from the system prompt. Do NOT invent skill-specific output formats; they break parsing and cross-review.
|
|
34
23
|
|
|
35
24
|
## Don't
|
|
36
25
|
- Don't nitpick style issues that a linter should catch
|
|
@@ -19,20 +19,7 @@
|
|
|
19
19
|
7. **Verify** — run the reproduction again; confirm no regression in related tests
|
|
20
20
|
|
|
21
21
|
## Output Format
|
|
22
|
-
|
|
23
|
-
```
|
|
24
|
-
## Root Cause
|
|
25
|
-
[One sentence: what was wrong and why]
|
|
26
|
-
|
|
27
|
-
## How It Was Found
|
|
28
|
-
[The reproduction steps and the hypothesis that proved correct]
|
|
29
|
-
|
|
30
|
-
## Fix Applied
|
|
31
|
-
[File and change summary]
|
|
32
|
-
|
|
33
|
-
## Regression Test Added
|
|
34
|
-
[Yes/No and location]
|
|
35
|
-
```
|
|
22
|
+
Use the FINDING TAG SCHEMA from the system prompt. Do NOT invent skill-specific output formats; they break parsing and cross-review.
|
|
36
23
|
|
|
37
24
|
## Don't
|
|
38
25
|
- Don't make multiple changes at once — you won't know which one fixed it
|
|
@@ -18,10 +18,7 @@
|
|
|
18
18
|
6. **Diagrams** — prefer text-based (Mermaid) over image files so they stay in version control
|
|
19
19
|
|
|
20
20
|
## Output Format
|
|
21
|
-
|
|
22
|
-
- List what is documented, what is missing, and what is stale
|
|
23
|
-
- Flag public APIs with no docs as **[missing]**
|
|
24
|
-
- Flag docs that contradict the code as **[stale]**
|
|
21
|
+
Use the FINDING TAG SCHEMA from the system prompt. Do NOT invent skill-specific output formats; they break parsing and cross-review.
|
|
25
22
|
|
|
26
23
|
## Don't
|
|
27
24
|
- Don't document what the code already says clearly — no `// increment i by 1`
|
|
@@ -26,10 +26,7 @@
|
|
|
26
26
|
- [ ] Function names describe the action, not the mechanism
|
|
27
27
|
|
|
28
28
|
## Output Format
|
|
29
|
-
|
|
30
|
-
- List files created or modified
|
|
31
|
-
- Note any assumptions made about requirements
|
|
32
|
-
- Flag anything that should be followed up (tech debt, deferred edge cases)
|
|
29
|
+
Use the FINDING TAG SCHEMA from the system prompt. Do NOT invent skill-specific output formats; they break parsing and cross-review.
|
|
33
30
|
|
|
34
31
|
## Don't
|
|
35
32
|
- Don't copy-paste large blocks — extract a shared function
|
|
@@ -18,23 +18,7 @@
|
|
|
18
18
|
6. **Recommend next steps** — if further information would change the answer, say what and how to get it
|
|
19
19
|
|
|
20
20
|
## Output Format
|
|
21
|
-
|
|
22
|
-
## Bottom Line
|
|
23
|
-
[One paragraph: the answer to the question, stated directly]
|
|
24
|
-
|
|
25
|
-
## Evidence
|
|
26
|
-
- [source/type] <finding that supports the conclusion>
|
|
27
|
-
- [source/type] <finding that supports the conclusion>
|
|
28
|
-
|
|
29
|
-
## Conflicting Information
|
|
30
|
-
- [what contradicts the conclusion and why it was discounted]
|
|
31
|
-
|
|
32
|
-
## Gaps
|
|
33
|
-
- [what is unknown and what would resolve it]
|
|
34
|
-
|
|
35
|
-
## Sources
|
|
36
|
-
- [URL or citation]
|
|
37
|
-
```
|
|
21
|
+
Use the FINDING TAG SCHEMA from the system prompt. Do NOT invent skill-specific output formats; they break parsing and cross-review.
|
|
38
22
|
|
|
39
23
|
## Don't
|
|
40
24
|
- Don't present a conclusion without evidence
|
|
@@ -24,20 +24,7 @@
|
|
|
24
24
|
12. **Resource cleanup** — Are timers cleared on shutdown? Connections closed? Maps and caches pruned with TTL? What happens to in-flight tasks when a worker disconnects mid-execution?
|
|
25
25
|
|
|
26
26
|
## Output Format
|
|
27
|
-
|
|
28
|
-
## Security Findings
|
|
29
|
-
|
|
30
|
-
### [critical] <Title>
|
|
31
|
-
- Location: <file>:<line>
|
|
32
|
-
- Risk: <what an attacker can do>
|
|
33
|
-
- Fix: <concrete remediation>
|
|
34
|
-
|
|
35
|
-
### [high/medium/low] <Title>
|
|
36
|
-
...
|
|
37
|
-
|
|
38
|
-
## No Issues Found
|
|
39
|
-
[List areas that were checked and found clean]
|
|
40
|
-
```
|
|
27
|
+
Use the FINDING TAG SCHEMA from the system prompt. Do NOT invent skill-specific output formats; they break parsing and cross-review.
|
|
41
28
|
|
|
42
29
|
## Don't
|
|
43
30
|
- Don't report theoretical vulnerabilities with no realistic attack path
|
|
@@ -19,20 +19,7 @@
|
|
|
19
19
|
7. **Trade-offs** — document at least two alternatives and why the chosen approach wins
|
|
20
20
|
|
|
21
21
|
## Output Format
|
|
22
|
-
|
|
23
|
-
## Components
|
|
24
|
-
- <Name>: <responsibility> | interface: <key methods or API>
|
|
25
|
-
|
|
26
|
-
## Data Flow
|
|
27
|
-
[Numbered steps tracing one key request end-to-end]
|
|
28
|
-
|
|
29
|
-
## Failure Modes
|
|
30
|
-
- <Component> fails → <system behavior and recovery>
|
|
31
|
-
|
|
32
|
-
## Trade-offs
|
|
33
|
-
- Chose X over Y because: <reason>
|
|
34
|
-
- Deferred Z because: <reason>
|
|
35
|
-
```
|
|
22
|
+
Use the FINDING TAG SCHEMA from the system prompt. Do NOT invent skill-specific output formats; they break parsing and cross-review.
|
|
36
23
|
|
|
37
24
|
## Don't
|
|
38
25
|
- Don't add components without a clear, single responsibility
|
|
@@ -25,10 +25,7 @@
|
|
|
25
25
|
- Concurrent or repeated calls if the function has state
|
|
26
26
|
|
|
27
27
|
## Output Format
|
|
28
|
-
|
|
29
|
-
- List what scenarios are covered
|
|
30
|
-
- Flag any untested code paths
|
|
31
|
-
- Note if mocking strategy is over-reaching (testing mocks, not code)
|
|
28
|
+
Use the FINDING TAG SCHEMA from the system prompt. Do NOT invent skill-specific output formats; they break parsing and cross-review.
|
|
32
29
|
|
|
33
30
|
## Don't
|
|
34
31
|
- Don't test private methods directly — test through the public API
|
|
@@ -19,10 +19,7 @@
|
|
|
19
19
|
7. Use `satisfies` operator to validate shape without widening type
|
|
20
20
|
|
|
21
21
|
## Output Format
|
|
22
|
-
|
|
23
|
-
- Flag type issues with severity: **[critical]**, **[warning]**, **[style]**
|
|
24
|
-
- Show the corrected snippet inline
|
|
25
|
-
- Explain the type safety risk briefly (one line)
|
|
22
|
+
Use the FINDING TAG SCHEMA from the system prompt. Do NOT invent skill-specific output formats; they break parsing and cross-review.
|
|
26
23
|
|
|
27
24
|
## Don't
|
|
28
25
|
- Don't use `as` casts to silence errors — fix the types instead
|