godpowers 1.6.8 → 1.6.9
This diff represents the content of publicly available package versions that have been released to one of the supported registries. The information contained in this diff is provided for informational purposes only and reflects changes between package versions as they appear in their respective public registries.
- package/CHANGELOG.md +38 -0
- package/README.md +4 -4
- package/RELEASE.md +34 -32
- package/SKILL.md +25 -0
- package/package.json +1 -1
- package/skills/god-agent-audit.md +7 -0
- package/skills/god-archaeology.md +7 -0
- package/skills/god-audit.md +10 -0
- package/skills/god-context-scan.md +13 -0
- package/skills/god-design-impact.md +8 -0
- package/skills/god-discuss.md +7 -0
- package/skills/god-doctor.md +17 -0
- package/skills/god-explore.md +8 -0
- package/skills/god-hygiene.md +7 -0
- package/skills/god-lifecycle.md +25 -0
- package/skills/god-list-assumptions.md +13 -0
- package/skills/god-locate.md +16 -0
- package/skills/god-map-codebase.md +8 -0
- package/skills/god-next.md +18 -0
- package/skills/god-preflight.md +14 -0
- package/skills/god-reconcile.md +6 -1
- package/skills/god-reconstruct.md +8 -0
- package/skills/god-refactor.md +23 -0
- package/skills/god-roadmap-check.md +10 -0
- package/skills/god-spike.md +7 -0
- package/skills/god-standards.md +7 -0
- package/skills/god-status.md +17 -0
- package/skills/god-tech-debt.md +8 -0
- package/skills/god.md +16 -0
package/CHANGELOG.md
CHANGED
|
@@ -5,6 +5,44 @@ All notable changes to Godpowers will be documented in this file.
|
|
|
5
5
|
The format is based on [Keep a Changelog](https://keepachangelog.com/en/1.1.0/),
|
|
6
6
|
and this project adheres to [Semantic Versioning](https://semver.org/spec/v2.0.0.html).
|
|
7
7
|
|
|
8
|
+
## [1.6.9] - 2026-05-16
|
|
9
|
+
|
|
10
|
+
Proposal closeout patch. Makes Godpowers end exploratory, diagnostic, audit,
|
|
11
|
+
status, lifecycle, and decision-support answers with concrete choices instead
|
|
12
|
+
of leaving the user to infer the next action.
|
|
13
|
+
|
|
14
|
+
### Added
|
|
15
|
+
- Added a core Proposal Closeout rule requiring a `Proposition:` block when
|
|
16
|
+
Godpowers gives a recommendation, proposal, exploratory plan, diagnostic
|
|
17
|
+
report, status report, audit report, lifecycle report, reconciliation report,
|
|
18
|
+
or decision-support response without directly launching work.
|
|
19
|
+
- Added proposition closeouts to `/god`, `/god-next`, `/god-status`,
|
|
20
|
+
`/god-lifecycle`, `/god-locate`, `/god-context-scan`, `/god-preflight`,
|
|
21
|
+
`/god-doctor`, `/god-audit`, `/god-hygiene`, `/god-standards`, and
|
|
22
|
+
`/god-agent-audit`.
|
|
23
|
+
- Added proposition closeouts to proposal-heavy planning and analysis commands:
|
|
24
|
+
`/god-discuss`, `/god-explore`, `/god-list-assumptions`, `/god-refactor`,
|
|
25
|
+
`/god-spike`, `/god-tech-debt`, `/god-archaeology`, `/god-map-codebase`,
|
|
26
|
+
`/god-reconstruct`, `/god-design-impact`, `/god-reconcile`, and
|
|
27
|
+
`/god-roadmap-check`.
|
|
28
|
+
|
|
29
|
+
### Changed
|
|
30
|
+
- Proposal-style outputs now mirror the clearer GSD pattern: implement a small
|
|
31
|
+
slice, implement the full route, discuss more, inspect status, or run
|
|
32
|
+
`/god-mode` only when that is safe.
|
|
33
|
+
- `/god-next` and `/god-status` now explicitly distinguish partial progress,
|
|
34
|
+
full autonomous continuation, discussion, and inspection choices.
|
|
35
|
+
- Diagnostic commands now avoid recommending broad automation when blockers or
|
|
36
|
+
disk-state inconsistencies make that unsafe.
|
|
37
|
+
|
|
38
|
+
### Guardrails
|
|
39
|
+
- Pure completion commands can still use their normal `Suggested next` line
|
|
40
|
+
after a verified artifact is produced.
|
|
41
|
+
- `/god-mode` is not offered as a blanket answer when a blocker, failing gate,
|
|
42
|
+
manual repair, or unresolved ambiguity should be addressed first.
|
|
43
|
+
- The patch changes guidance only. It does not add slash commands, specialist
|
|
44
|
+
agents, workflows, recipes, schemas, or public artifact formats.
|
|
45
|
+
|
|
8
46
|
## [1.6.8] - 2026-05-16
|
|
9
47
|
|
|
10
48
|
Staging deferral patch. Keeps Godpowers moving through local and CI-verifiable
|
package/README.md
CHANGED
|
@@ -2,7 +2,7 @@
|
|
|
2
2
|
|
|
3
3
|
[](https://github.com/aihxp/godpowers/actions/workflows/ci.yml)
|
|
4
4
|
[](LICENSE)
|
|
5
|
-
[](CHANGELOG.md)
|
|
6
6
|
[](https://www.npmjs.com/package/godpowers)
|
|
7
7
|
|
|
8
8
|
**Ship fast. Ship right. Ship everything. Ship accountably.**
|
|
@@ -12,9 +12,9 @@ idea to hardened production. It runs as **slash commands inside your AI coding
|
|
|
12
12
|
tool** (Claude Code, Codex, Cursor, etc.) that orchestrate **specialist agents**
|
|
13
13
|
in fresh contexts to do the work.
|
|
14
14
|
|
|
15
|
-
Version 1.6.
|
|
16
|
-
|
|
17
|
-
|
|
15
|
+
Version 1.6.9 keeps the stable Godpowers surface while making proposal and
|
|
16
|
+
status outputs easier to act on: exploratory, diagnostic, audit, lifecycle, and
|
|
17
|
+
decision-support commands now end with explicit proposition choices.
|
|
18
18
|
|
|
19
19
|
It fuses four disciplines into one unified workflow:
|
|
20
20
|
|
package/RELEASE.md
CHANGED
|
@@ -1,11 +1,11 @@
|
|
|
1
|
-
# Godpowers 1.6.
|
|
1
|
+
# Godpowers 1.6.9 Release
|
|
2
2
|
|
|
3
3
|
Date: 2026-05-16
|
|
4
4
|
|
|
5
|
-
Godpowers 1.6.
|
|
6
|
-
|
|
7
|
-
|
|
8
|
-
|
|
5
|
+
Godpowers 1.6.9 makes proposal and report outputs easier to act on. The goal of
|
|
6
|
+
this patch is to keep Godpowers from ending a recommendation, audit, lifecycle
|
|
7
|
+
report, status report, or exploratory answer without offering concrete next
|
|
8
|
+
moves.
|
|
9
9
|
|
|
10
10
|
## What is stable
|
|
11
11
|
|
|
@@ -24,34 +24,36 @@ when the user requests staging or reaches final sign-off.
|
|
|
24
24
|
- Extension pack compatibility range for the 1.x line
|
|
25
25
|
- Domain precision through `.godpowers/domain/GLOSSARY.md` and DG-01 through
|
|
26
26
|
DG-05 checks
|
|
27
|
+
- GSD-style proposition closeouts for exploratory, diagnostic, audit,
|
|
28
|
+
lifecycle, status, reconciliation, and decision-support outputs
|
|
27
29
|
|
|
28
30
|
## What is new
|
|
29
31
|
|
|
30
|
-
-
|
|
31
|
-
|
|
32
|
-
|
|
33
|
-
|
|
34
|
-
-
|
|
35
|
-
|
|
36
|
-
|
|
37
|
-
|
|
38
|
-
|
|
39
|
-
|
|
40
|
-
-
|
|
41
|
-
|
|
42
|
-
|
|
43
|
-
|
|
44
|
-
|
|
45
|
-
|
|
46
|
-
|
|
47
|
-
|
|
48
|
-
|
|
49
|
-
|
|
50
|
-
|
|
51
|
-
|
|
52
|
-
|
|
53
|
-
|
|
54
|
-
|
|
32
|
+
- The core Godpowers skill now requires a `Proposition:` block after
|
|
33
|
+
recommendations, proposals, exploratory plans, diagnostics, status reports,
|
|
34
|
+
audits, lifecycle reports, reconciliations, and decision-support answers
|
|
35
|
+
when no command was launched.
|
|
36
|
+
- `/god`, `/god-next`, `/god-status`, `/god-lifecycle`, `/god-locate`,
|
|
37
|
+
`/god-context-scan`, `/god-preflight`, `/god-doctor`, `/god-audit`,
|
|
38
|
+
`/god-hygiene`, `/god-standards`, and `/god-agent-audit` now close with
|
|
39
|
+
concrete next choices.
|
|
40
|
+
- Planning and analysis commands such as `/god-discuss`, `/god-explore`,
|
|
41
|
+
`/god-list-assumptions`, `/god-refactor`, `/god-spike`, `/god-tech-debt`,
|
|
42
|
+
`/god-archaeology`, `/god-map-codebase`, `/god-reconstruct`,
|
|
43
|
+
`/god-design-impact`, `/god-reconcile`, and `/god-roadmap-check` now make
|
|
44
|
+
their next move explicit.
|
|
45
|
+
- Proposition blocks separate partial implementation, full implementation,
|
|
46
|
+
discussion, status inspection, and `/god-mode` continuation when safe.
|
|
47
|
+
|
|
48
|
+
## What 1.6.9 means
|
|
49
|
+
|
|
50
|
+
Godpowers 1.6.9 does not expand the public command surface. It changes how
|
|
51
|
+
Godpowers exits proposal-like work: the user should see useful routes forward
|
|
52
|
+
instead of only a recommendation.
|
|
53
|
+
|
|
54
|
+
Pure completion commands can still end with a normal `Suggested next` line when
|
|
55
|
+
an artifact was actually produced. Proposal, diagnostic, audit, lifecycle,
|
|
56
|
+
status, and decision-support commands must offer a proposition block.
|
|
55
57
|
|
|
56
58
|
Safe sync and unresolved Critical harden findings remain release-truth gates.
|
|
57
59
|
Per-repo Quarterback ownership remains intact for Mode D suite work.
|
|
@@ -61,8 +63,8 @@ Per-repo Quarterback ownership remains intact for Mode D suite work.
|
|
|
61
63
|
During the 1.x stability window, do not add broad new command families, change
|
|
62
64
|
schema formats, or rename public artifacts without evidence from real use.
|
|
63
65
|
|
|
64
|
-
The `v1.6.
|
|
65
|
-
`godpowers@1.6.
|
|
66
|
+
The `v1.6.9` git tag points to the release commit that matches the npm
|
|
67
|
+
`godpowers@1.6.9` package. Public publishes should prefer the tag-triggered
|
|
66
68
|
GitHub workflow so npm provenance, git history, and release notes stay aligned.
|
|
67
69
|
|
|
68
70
|
Allowed changes:
|
package/SKILL.md
CHANGED
|
@@ -67,6 +67,31 @@ answer a question, inspect first. When a term is resolved, record it in
|
|
|
67
67
|
`.godpowers/domain/GLOSSARY.md` with canonical spelling, avoided aliases,
|
|
68
68
|
relationships, and any unresolved ambiguity.
|
|
69
69
|
|
|
70
|
+
### 9. Proposal Closeout
|
|
71
|
+
When you answer with a recommendation, proposal, or exploratory plan and do not
|
|
72
|
+
make file edits, run commands, or hand off to another command, end with a
|
|
73
|
+
proposition block. The block must give the user concrete next moves instead of
|
|
74
|
+
leaving them at a dead stop.
|
|
75
|
+
|
|
76
|
+
This also applies to diagnostic, status, audit, lifecycle, reconciliation, and
|
|
77
|
+
decision-support reports when they end with suggestions, options, or a
|
|
78
|
+
recommended sequence.
|
|
79
|
+
|
|
80
|
+
Use this shape:
|
|
81
|
+
|
|
82
|
+
```
|
|
83
|
+
Proposition:
|
|
84
|
+
1. Implement partial: <smallest safe slice and command>
|
|
85
|
+
2. Implement complete: <larger command or arc>
|
|
86
|
+
3. Discuss more: <focused question or /god-discuss topic>
|
|
87
|
+
4. Run God Mode: /god-mode <optional flags or scope>
|
|
88
|
+
Recommended: <one option and why>
|
|
89
|
+
```
|
|
90
|
+
|
|
91
|
+
Only include options that actually fit the situation. If `/god-mode` is too
|
|
92
|
+
broad or unsafe for the request, say so and offer `/god-feature`,
|
|
93
|
+
`/god-refactor`, `/god-spike`, or `/god-discuss` instead.
|
|
94
|
+
|
|
70
95
|
---
|
|
71
96
|
|
|
72
97
|
## Operating Modes
|
package/package.json
CHANGED
|
@@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
|
|
|
1
1
|
{
|
|
2
2
|
"name": "godpowers",
|
|
3
|
-
"version": "1.6.
|
|
3
|
+
"version": "1.6.9",
|
|
4
4
|
"description": "AI-powered development system: 106 slash commands and 39 specialist agents that take a project from raw idea to hardened production. Runs inside Claude Code, Codex, Cursor, Windsurf, Gemini, and 10+ other AI coding tools.",
|
|
5
5
|
"bin": {
|
|
6
6
|
"godpowers": "./bin/install.js"
|
|
@@ -62,6 +62,13 @@ Warnings:
|
|
|
62
62
|
|
|
63
63
|
Infos: 90 missing-recommended-section suggestions across agents
|
|
64
64
|
(run with --json for full list)
|
|
65
|
+
|
|
66
|
+
Proposition:
|
|
67
|
+
1. Implement partial: fix the highest-priority error or warning
|
|
68
|
+
2. Implement complete: /god-agent-audit --fix for info-level placeholder sections only
|
|
69
|
+
3. Discuss more: /god-discuss agent contract findings
|
|
70
|
+
4. Inspect details: /god-agent-audit --json
|
|
71
|
+
Recommended: [one option and why]
|
|
65
72
|
```
|
|
66
73
|
|
|
67
74
|
## Backward-compatibility promise
|
|
@@ -45,4 +45,11 @@ Suggested next:
|
|
|
45
45
|
/god-reconstruct - reverse-engineer planning artifacts from this code
|
|
46
46
|
/god-tech-debt - assess and prioritize debt revealed
|
|
47
47
|
/god-feature - now safe to add new work with archaeology in hand
|
|
48
|
+
|
|
49
|
+
Proposition:
|
|
50
|
+
1. Implement partial: /god-tech-debt for only the highest-risk areas
|
|
51
|
+
2. Implement complete: /god-reconstruct then /god-audit for full brownfield alignment
|
|
52
|
+
3. Discuss more: /god-discuss the open tribal-knowledge questions
|
|
53
|
+
4. Run God Mode: /god-mode only after reconstruction or audit makes the state clear
|
|
54
|
+
Recommended: /god-reconstruct when planning artifacts are missing or stale.
|
|
48
55
|
```
|
package/skills/god-audit.md
CHANGED
|
@@ -52,6 +52,16 @@ After god-auditor returns:
|
|
|
52
52
|
1. Verify AUDIT-REPORT.md exists on disk
|
|
53
53
|
2. Display the summary table to the user
|
|
54
54
|
3. If any artifact scored below 80%: suggest re-running the failing tier
|
|
55
|
+
4. End with a proposition block:
|
|
56
|
+
|
|
57
|
+
```
|
|
58
|
+
Proposition:
|
|
59
|
+
1. Implement partial: [rerun the single lowest-scoring tier or fix the top finding]
|
|
60
|
+
2. Implement complete: [rerun all failing tiers in priority order]
|
|
61
|
+
3. Discuss more: /god-discuss audit remediation plan
|
|
62
|
+
4. Run God Mode: /god-mode only when the audit has no blocking findings
|
|
63
|
+
Recommended: [one option and why]
|
|
64
|
+
```
|
|
55
65
|
|
|
56
66
|
## Output Format
|
|
57
67
|
|
|
@@ -89,6 +89,19 @@ Suggested next:
|
|
|
89
89
|
2. Accept the 2 new todos: /god-check-todos
|
|
90
90
|
```
|
|
91
91
|
|
|
92
|
+
## Proposition Closeout
|
|
93
|
+
|
|
94
|
+
End every context scan report with a proposition block:
|
|
95
|
+
|
|
96
|
+
```
|
|
97
|
+
Proposition:
|
|
98
|
+
1. Implement partial: [first suggested action, usually /god-locate or /god-repair]
|
|
99
|
+
2. Implement complete: resolve all error and warn drifts, then rerun /god-context-scan
|
|
100
|
+
3. Discuss more: /god-discuss context drift
|
|
101
|
+
4. Inspect status: /god-status after re-orientation
|
|
102
|
+
Recommended: [one option and why]
|
|
103
|
+
```
|
|
104
|
+
|
|
92
105
|
## What this does NOT do
|
|
93
106
|
|
|
94
107
|
- Does not modify state. Read-only.
|
|
@@ -65,6 +65,14 @@ Transitive (depth 2):
|
|
|
65
65
|
|
|
66
66
|
Recommendation: Run /god-design with this change to apply.
|
|
67
67
|
god-design-reviewer will gate via two-stage review.
|
|
68
|
+
|
|
69
|
+
Proposition:
|
|
70
|
+
1. Implement partial: /god-design for only the lowest-risk token or component change
|
|
71
|
+
2. Implement complete: /god-design with the full proposed change
|
|
72
|
+
3. Discuss more: /god-discuss the design tradeoff before changing files
|
|
73
|
+
4. Run God Mode: /god-mode only if this design change is part of a wider arc
|
|
74
|
+
Recommended: apply the smallest design change first when severity is warning
|
|
75
|
+
or higher.
|
|
68
76
|
```
|
|
69
77
|
|
|
70
78
|
## When this skill helps
|
package/skills/god-discuss.md
CHANGED
|
@@ -67,4 +67,11 @@ Key findings:
|
|
|
67
67
|
- [term or ambiguity resolved]
|
|
68
68
|
|
|
69
69
|
Suggested next: [the planning command this discussion was for]
|
|
70
|
+
|
|
71
|
+
Proposition:
|
|
72
|
+
1. Implement partial: [smallest safe slice or planning command]
|
|
73
|
+
2. Implement complete: [full command that consumes this brief]
|
|
74
|
+
3. Discuss more: /god-discuss [specific unresolved question]
|
|
75
|
+
4. Run God Mode: /god-mode [scope] if the user wants autonomous execution
|
|
76
|
+
Recommended: [one option and why]
|
|
70
77
|
```
|
package/skills/god-doctor.md
CHANGED
|
@@ -65,6 +65,23 @@ Suggested next steps:
|
|
|
65
65
|
2. /god-restore (review trash)
|
|
66
66
|
```
|
|
67
67
|
|
|
68
|
+
## Proposition Closeout
|
|
69
|
+
|
|
70
|
+
End every human-readable doctor report with a proposition block:
|
|
71
|
+
|
|
72
|
+
```
|
|
73
|
+
Proposition:
|
|
74
|
+
1. Implement partial: [safest single fix or diagnostic follow-up]
|
|
75
|
+
2. Implement complete: /god-doctor --fix when all proposed fixes are safe categories
|
|
76
|
+
3. Discuss more: /god-discuss [highest-risk warning or unclear repair]
|
|
77
|
+
4. Inspect status: /god-status after repair
|
|
78
|
+
Recommended: [one option and why it is safe]
|
|
79
|
+
```
|
|
80
|
+
|
|
81
|
+
If the report contains errors that need manual repair, do not recommend
|
|
82
|
+
`/god-doctor --fix` as complete. Recommend the highest-priority manual repair
|
|
83
|
+
or `/god-repair` instead.
|
|
84
|
+
|
|
68
85
|
## Subcommands
|
|
69
86
|
|
|
70
87
|
### `/god-doctor`
|
package/skills/god-explore.md
CHANGED
|
@@ -47,4 +47,12 @@ Idea explored. Suggested framing:
|
|
|
47
47
|
|
|
48
48
|
Suggested next: /god-init (commit to this framing) or /god-explore again
|
|
49
49
|
(if you want to try another angle)
|
|
50
|
+
|
|
51
|
+
Proposition:
|
|
52
|
+
1. Implement partial: /god-init with this framing and stop after PRD
|
|
53
|
+
2. Implement complete: /god-mode with this framing for the full arc
|
|
54
|
+
3. Discuss more: /god-explore again with the weakest assumption
|
|
55
|
+
4. Run God Mode: /god-mode if the user is ready to build now
|
|
56
|
+
Recommended: /god-init when the framing feels stable enough to turn into
|
|
57
|
+
requirements.
|
|
50
58
|
```
|
package/skills/god-hygiene.md
CHANGED
|
@@ -93,6 +93,13 @@ Suggested next actions (in priority order):
|
|
|
93
93
|
3. [next]
|
|
94
94
|
|
|
95
95
|
Schedule next hygiene check in [N days] (default: 30).
|
|
96
|
+
|
|
97
|
+
Proposition:
|
|
98
|
+
1. Implement partial: [highest-priority action]
|
|
99
|
+
2. Implement complete: [all P0/P1 hygiene actions in order]
|
|
100
|
+
3. Discuss more: /god-discuss hygiene remediation
|
|
101
|
+
4. Inspect status: /god-status after fixes
|
|
102
|
+
Recommended: [one option and why]
|
|
96
103
|
```
|
|
97
104
|
|
|
98
105
|
## Have-Nots
|
package/skills/god-lifecycle.md
CHANGED
|
@@ -111,6 +111,31 @@ Suggested next: /god-spike with narrower question
|
|
|
111
111
|
Or: archive the spike if no longer relevant
|
|
112
112
|
```
|
|
113
113
|
|
|
114
|
+
## Proposition Closeout
|
|
115
|
+
|
|
116
|
+
Every lifecycle report must end with a proposition block. Use the detected
|
|
117
|
+
phase to fill in concrete commands:
|
|
118
|
+
|
|
119
|
+
```
|
|
120
|
+
Proposition:
|
|
121
|
+
1. Implement partial: [smallest safe next command from the lifecycle report]
|
|
122
|
+
2. Implement complete: /god-mode [resume or scope] when the phase is safe for an autonomous arc
|
|
123
|
+
3. Discuss more: /god-discuss [unclear phase, blocker, or choice]
|
|
124
|
+
4. Inspect status: /god-status or /god-next
|
|
125
|
+
Recommended: [one option and why it matches the detected phase]
|
|
126
|
+
```
|
|
127
|
+
|
|
128
|
+
For hard blockers, such as post-incident pending, replace the broad options
|
|
129
|
+
with the required next command plus inspect and discuss alternatives:
|
|
130
|
+
|
|
131
|
+
```
|
|
132
|
+
Proposition:
|
|
133
|
+
1. Resolve required next: /god-postmortem
|
|
134
|
+
2. Inspect first: /god-status
|
|
135
|
+
3. Discuss blocker: /god-discuss incident follow-up
|
|
136
|
+
Recommended: /god-postmortem because the incident learning loop is still open.
|
|
137
|
+
```
|
|
138
|
+
|
|
114
139
|
## Have-Nots
|
|
115
140
|
|
|
116
141
|
Lifecycle check FAILS if:
|
|
@@ -48,6 +48,19 @@ Assumptions Claude is operating under:
|
|
|
48
48
|
Any of these wrong? Flag them now before they cement into decisions.
|
|
49
49
|
```
|
|
50
50
|
|
|
51
|
+
## Proposition Closeout
|
|
52
|
+
|
|
53
|
+
After listing assumptions, end with a proposition block:
|
|
54
|
+
|
|
55
|
+
```
|
|
56
|
+
Proposition:
|
|
57
|
+
1. Implement partial: correct or confirm the low-confidence assumptions only
|
|
58
|
+
2. Implement complete: confirm assumptions and continue to [queued command]
|
|
59
|
+
3. Discuss more: /god-discuss assumptions before planning
|
|
60
|
+
4. Inspect status: /god-status to re-ground before deciding
|
|
61
|
+
Recommended: [one option and why]
|
|
62
|
+
```
|
|
63
|
+
|
|
51
64
|
## Have-Nots
|
|
52
65
|
|
|
53
66
|
- Assumptions are too vague to verify ("we're building a good product")
|
package/skills/god-locate.md
CHANGED
|
@@ -73,6 +73,22 @@ Drift check:
|
|
|
73
73
|
- If gap > 1 hour, run /god-context-scan
|
|
74
74
|
```
|
|
75
75
|
|
|
76
|
+
## Proposition Closeout
|
|
77
|
+
|
|
78
|
+
The orientation summary must end with a compact proposition block:
|
|
79
|
+
|
|
80
|
+
```
|
|
81
|
+
Proposition:
|
|
82
|
+
1. Implement partial: [next suggested command]
|
|
83
|
+
2. Implement complete: /god-mode to continue the arc when no drift is flagged
|
|
84
|
+
3. Discuss more: /god-discuss [unclear state or stale checkpoint]
|
|
85
|
+
4. Inspect status: /god-status for the full report
|
|
86
|
+
Recommended: [one option and why]
|
|
87
|
+
```
|
|
88
|
+
|
|
89
|
+
If drift is flagged, recommend `/god-context-scan` or `/god-repair` before
|
|
90
|
+
continuing work.
|
|
91
|
+
|
|
76
92
|
## Process
|
|
77
93
|
|
|
78
94
|
1. If `.godpowers/` does not exist: report "no Godpowers project here"
|
|
@@ -42,4 +42,12 @@ Codebase mapped.
|
|
|
42
42
|
+ .godpowers/codebase/concerns.md
|
|
43
43
|
|
|
44
44
|
Suggested next: /god-init Mode B (gap-fill) or /god-feature
|
|
45
|
+
|
|
46
|
+
Proposition:
|
|
47
|
+
1. Implement partial: /god-intel or /god-tech-debt on the riskiest mapped area
|
|
48
|
+
2. Implement complete: /god-init Mode B to gap-fill project artifacts
|
|
49
|
+
3. Discuss more: /god-discuss the unclear architecture or quality findings
|
|
50
|
+
4. Run God Mode: /god-mode after Mode B context exists
|
|
51
|
+
Recommended: /god-init Mode B when the codebase is real but Godpowers artifacts
|
|
52
|
+
are missing.
|
|
45
53
|
```
|
package/skills/god-next.md
CHANGED
|
@@ -312,3 +312,21 @@ Previous tier had standards failures. Address before proceeding:
|
|
|
312
312
|
- [failure 2]
|
|
313
313
|
Suggested: /god-redo [tier] OR /god-skip [tier] --reason="..."
|
|
314
314
|
```
|
|
315
|
+
|
|
316
|
+
## Proposition Closeout
|
|
317
|
+
|
|
318
|
+
Every `/god-next` response must end with a proposition block unless it already
|
|
319
|
+
launched the selected command:
|
|
320
|
+
|
|
321
|
+
```
|
|
322
|
+
Proposition:
|
|
323
|
+
1. Implement partial: [single suggested command]
|
|
324
|
+
2. Implement complete: [recipe sequence or /god-mode when safe]
|
|
325
|
+
3. Discuss more: /god-discuss [routing ambiguity or missing prerequisite]
|
|
326
|
+
4. Inspect status: /god-status or /god-locate
|
|
327
|
+
Recommended: [one option and why]
|
|
328
|
+
```
|
|
329
|
+
|
|
330
|
+
For missing prerequisites, the partial option is the auto-completable
|
|
331
|
+
prerequisite. For standards failures, the partial option is `/god-redo` with
|
|
332
|
+
feedback and the complete option is blocked until the gate passes.
|
package/skills/god-preflight.md
CHANGED
|
@@ -137,6 +137,20 @@ Use the report to choose the next pass:
|
|
|
137
137
|
| Tests are absent before refactor | `/god-add-tests` |
|
|
138
138
|
| Refactor path is obvious and bounded | `/god-refactor` |
|
|
139
139
|
|
|
140
|
+
## Proposition Closeout
|
|
141
|
+
|
|
142
|
+
End the user-facing response with a proposition block based on the recommended
|
|
143
|
+
sequence:
|
|
144
|
+
|
|
145
|
+
```
|
|
146
|
+
Proposition:
|
|
147
|
+
1. Implement partial: [first recommended command or task]
|
|
148
|
+
2. Implement complete: [full recommended sequence]
|
|
149
|
+
3. Discuss more: /god-discuss [highest uncertainty or blocker]
|
|
150
|
+
4. Run God Mode: /god-mode only when the preflight says the repo is arc-ready or the remaining gaps are acceptable
|
|
151
|
+
Recommended: [first command and why it should happen before the rest]
|
|
152
|
+
```
|
|
153
|
+
|
|
140
154
|
## Guardrails
|
|
141
155
|
|
|
142
156
|
- Build nothing.
|
package/skills/god-reconcile.md
CHANGED
|
@@ -74,7 +74,12 @@ Recommended sequence:
|
|
|
74
74
|
Main work: [/god-feature scoped to Milestone 2]
|
|
75
75
|
Post-work: [/god-sync]
|
|
76
76
|
|
|
77
|
-
|
|
77
|
+
Proposition:
|
|
78
|
+
1. Implement partial: [run only the first preflight command]
|
|
79
|
+
2. Implement complete: [run the full recommended sequence]
|
|
80
|
+
3. Discuss more: /god-discuss [ambiguous overlap or artifact conflict]
|
|
81
|
+
4. Cancel: leave artifacts unchanged
|
|
82
|
+
Recommended: [one option and why]
|
|
78
83
|
```
|
|
79
84
|
|
|
80
85
|
## Difference from /god-roadmap-check
|
|
@@ -58,6 +58,14 @@ Suggested next:
|
|
|
58
58
|
/god-audit - score the reconstructed artifacts
|
|
59
59
|
/god-feature - now you can add features with reconciliation
|
|
60
60
|
/god-tech-debt - assess what needs paying down
|
|
61
|
+
|
|
62
|
+
Proposition:
|
|
63
|
+
1. Implement partial: /god-audit the reconstructed artifacts first
|
|
64
|
+
2. Implement complete: /god-audit then /god-feature with reconciliation
|
|
65
|
+
3. Discuss more: /god-discuss stakeholder review questions
|
|
66
|
+
4. Run God Mode: /god-mode after stakeholder review or audit accepts the reconstruction
|
|
67
|
+
Recommended: /god-audit before new feature work because reconstruction is
|
|
68
|
+
evidence-derived, not stakeholder-approved.
|
|
61
69
|
```
|
|
62
70
|
|
|
63
71
|
## Caveats
|
package/skills/god-refactor.md
CHANGED
|
@@ -88,6 +88,29 @@ Behavior: unchanged
|
|
|
88
88
|
Suggested next: /god-status or continue with /god-feature
|
|
89
89
|
```
|
|
90
90
|
|
|
91
|
+
## Proposal Mode
|
|
92
|
+
|
|
93
|
+
When the user asks for a proposal, recommendation, or performance-improvement
|
|
94
|
+
approach and no files are edited, do not stop after the advice. End with a
|
|
95
|
+
proposition block that turns the recommendation into user-selectable next
|
|
96
|
+
moves.
|
|
97
|
+
|
|
98
|
+
Use this shape:
|
|
99
|
+
|
|
100
|
+
```
|
|
101
|
+
Proposition:
|
|
102
|
+
1. Implement partial: /god-spike <measurement or smallest safe slice>
|
|
103
|
+
2. Implement complete: /god-refactor <full scoped refactor>
|
|
104
|
+
3. Discuss more: /god-discuss <unresolved scope question>
|
|
105
|
+
4. Run God Mode: /god-mode <scope> if the user wants the full autonomous arc
|
|
106
|
+
Recommended: <one option and why>
|
|
107
|
+
```
|
|
108
|
+
|
|
109
|
+
For performance refactors, prefer partial implementation when measurement is
|
|
110
|
+
missing. Example:
|
|
111
|
+
`Implement partial: /god-spike startup timeline to measure load phases before
|
|
112
|
+
refactoring.`
|
|
113
|
+
|
|
91
114
|
## Have-Nots
|
|
92
115
|
|
|
93
116
|
Refactor FAILS if:
|
|
@@ -57,6 +57,16 @@ After god-roadmap-reconciler returns:
|
|
|
57
57
|
1. Verify the verdict has a status from the canonical 6
|
|
58
58
|
2. Verify recommendation has a concrete action
|
|
59
59
|
3. Display to user; await decision before proceeding
|
|
60
|
+
4. End with a proposition block:
|
|
61
|
+
|
|
62
|
+
```
|
|
63
|
+
Proposition:
|
|
64
|
+
1. Implement partial: [smallest command from the recommendation]
|
|
65
|
+
2. Implement complete: [roadmap update plus feature work when needed]
|
|
66
|
+
3. Discuss more: /god-discuss roadmap overlap
|
|
67
|
+
4. Defer: /god-add-backlog [intent]
|
|
68
|
+
Recommended: [one option and why]
|
|
69
|
+
```
|
|
60
70
|
|
|
61
71
|
## When called manually
|
|
62
72
|
|
package/skills/god-spike.md
CHANGED
|
@@ -84,6 +84,13 @@ Suggested next:
|
|
|
84
84
|
- If rejecting: archive .godpowers/spikes/<question-slug>/
|
|
85
85
|
- If unclear: /god-spike with narrower question
|
|
86
86
|
|
|
87
|
+
Proposition:
|
|
88
|
+
1. Implement partial: /god-feature for the smallest proven slice
|
|
89
|
+
2. Implement complete: /god-feature with the full recommendation
|
|
90
|
+
3. Discuss more: /god-discuss the remaining uncertainty
|
|
91
|
+
4. Run God Mode: /god-mode only if this spike unblocks the full arc
|
|
92
|
+
Recommended: proceed only when SPIKE.md has a clear DECISION and evidence.
|
|
93
|
+
|
|
87
94
|
REMINDER: spike code is throwaway. Do NOT merge to main.
|
|
88
95
|
```
|
|
89
96
|
|
package/skills/god-standards.md
CHANGED
|
@@ -54,6 +54,13 @@ Verdict: PARTIAL (87%)
|
|
|
54
54
|
Suggested next:
|
|
55
55
|
/god-redo prd to address failures with feedback
|
|
56
56
|
/god-skip prd --reason "..." to accept-as-is
|
|
57
|
+
|
|
58
|
+
Proposition:
|
|
59
|
+
1. Implement partial: /god-redo [tier] with the listed failures
|
|
60
|
+
2. Implement complete: fix all failures, rerun /god-standards, then continue the gate
|
|
61
|
+
3. Discuss more: /god-discuss standards failure
|
|
62
|
+
4. Skip: /god-skip [tier] --reason "..." only with an explicit reason
|
|
63
|
+
Recommended: [one option and why]
|
|
57
64
|
```
|
|
58
65
|
|
|
59
66
|
## Auto-invocation
|
package/skills/god-status.md
CHANGED
|
@@ -92,6 +92,23 @@ Suite (Mode D) status:
|
|
|
92
92
|
Next: god roadmap
|
|
93
93
|
```
|
|
94
94
|
|
|
95
|
+
## Proposition Closeout
|
|
96
|
+
|
|
97
|
+
Every status report must end with a proposition block so the user can choose
|
|
98
|
+
how much momentum to give Godpowers:
|
|
99
|
+
|
|
100
|
+
```
|
|
101
|
+
Proposition:
|
|
102
|
+
1. Implement partial: [single next command from "What happens next"]
|
|
103
|
+
2. Implement complete: /god-mode to continue the current arc when no blockers are present
|
|
104
|
+
3. Discuss more: /god-discuss [unclear state, blocker, or inconsistency]
|
|
105
|
+
4. Inspect status: /god-locate or /god-next for a smaller routing view
|
|
106
|
+
Recommended: [one option and why it fits the disk-derived state]
|
|
107
|
+
```
|
|
108
|
+
|
|
109
|
+
If inconsistencies are present, make `/god-repair` the partial option and do
|
|
110
|
+
not recommend `/god-mode` until disk state is coherent.
|
|
111
|
+
|
|
95
112
|
## Mode D awareness
|
|
96
113
|
|
|
97
114
|
If `lib/multi-repo-detector.detect(projectRoot)` returns
|
package/skills/god-tech-debt.md
CHANGED
|
@@ -53,4 +53,12 @@ Suggested next:
|
|
|
53
53
|
- /god-update-deps if dependency debt is a P0/P1 driver
|
|
54
54
|
- /god-upgrade for major-version migrations
|
|
55
55
|
- Re-run /god-tech-debt quarterly
|
|
56
|
+
|
|
57
|
+
Proposition:
|
|
58
|
+
1. Implement partial: run the command for the top P0 item only
|
|
59
|
+
2. Implement complete: /god-feature or /god-refactor for the full P0 bundle
|
|
60
|
+
3. Discuss more: /god-discuss the highest-cost or highest-risk debt item
|
|
61
|
+
4. Run God Mode: /god-mode only if debt work should join the full arc
|
|
62
|
+
Recommended: start with the top P0 item, then re-run /god-tech-debt after it
|
|
63
|
+
lands.
|
|
56
64
|
```
|
package/skills/god.md
CHANGED
|
@@ -112,6 +112,22 @@ Recipes that fit your current state:
|
|
|
112
112
|
Run structural next? (yes / pick recipe / cancel)
|
|
113
113
|
```
|
|
114
114
|
|
|
115
|
+
If the answer is exploratory and proposes an approach instead of selecting or
|
|
116
|
+
running a command, close with:
|
|
117
|
+
|
|
118
|
+
```
|
|
119
|
+
Proposition:
|
|
120
|
+
1. Implement partial: <smallest safe command or slice>
|
|
121
|
+
2. Implement complete: <full command sequence>
|
|
122
|
+
3. Discuss more: /god-discuss <topic or unresolved question>
|
|
123
|
+
4. Run God Mode: /god-mode <scope> if the user wants the full autonomous arc
|
|
124
|
+
Recommended: <one option and why>
|
|
125
|
+
```
|
|
126
|
+
|
|
127
|
+
Do not include a God Mode option when the request is clearly a tiny fix,
|
|
128
|
+
single-file change, or narrow question. In that case, replace it with the
|
|
129
|
+
smallest matching command, such as `/god-fast`, `/god-spike`, or `/god-next`.
|
|
130
|
+
|
|
115
131
|
### Step 4: execute or hand off
|
|
116
132
|
|
|
117
133
|
If user confirms a recipe:
|