gm-cc 2.0.674 → 2.0.676
This diff represents the content of publicly available package versions that have been released to one of the supported registries. The information contained in this diff is provided for informational purposes only and reflects changes between package versions as they appear in their respective public registries.
|
@@ -4,7 +4,7 @@
|
|
|
4
4
|
"name": "AnEntrypoint"
|
|
5
5
|
},
|
|
6
6
|
"description": "State machine agent with hooks, skills, and automated git enforcement",
|
|
7
|
-
"version": "2.0.
|
|
7
|
+
"version": "2.0.676",
|
|
8
8
|
"metadata": {
|
|
9
9
|
"description": "State machine agent with hooks, skills, and automated git enforcement"
|
|
10
10
|
},
|
package/package.json
CHANGED
package/plugin.json
CHANGED
package/skills/gm-emit/SKILL.md
CHANGED
|
@@ -22,6 +22,7 @@ For every claim landing in a file:
|
|
|
22
22
|
2. **Repair legality** — local patch dressed as structural repair? Downgrade scope or snake to PLAN.
|
|
23
23
|
3. **Lawful downgrade** — can a weaker, true statement replace it? PREFER the downgrade.
|
|
24
24
|
4. **Alternative-route suppression** — live competing route being silenced? Preserve it.
|
|
25
|
+
5. **Strongest objection** — if a reviewer pushed back on this change, what would the sharpest argument be? Articulate it. Cannot articulate = have not understood the alternatives = regress to `gm-execute`.
|
|
25
26
|
|
|
26
27
|
Fail any → regress to `gm-execute` to witness what was missing, or `planning` if gap is structural.
|
|
27
28
|
|
|
@@ -56,6 +57,7 @@ console.log(await fn(realInput));
|
|
|
56
57
|
- Post-emit matches pre-emit exactly
|
|
57
58
|
- Hot reloadable; errors throw with context (no fallbacks, `|| default`, `catch { return null }`)
|
|
58
59
|
- No mocks/fakes/stubs/scattered test files (delete on discovery)
|
|
60
|
+
- Behavior change in this emit = a corresponding assertion in test.js (a change no test would catch is a change you cannot prove)
|
|
59
61
|
- Files ≤200 lines
|
|
60
62
|
- No duplicate concern (run exec:codesearch for primary concern after writing; any overlap → `planning`)
|
|
61
63
|
- No comments; no hardcoded values; no adjectives in identifiers; no unnecessary files
|
|
@@ -32,9 +32,11 @@ Unresolved after 2 passes = regress to `planning`. Never narrate past an unresol
|
|
|
32
32
|
Route candidates from PLAN = `weak_prior` only. Plausibility = right to TEST, not BELIEVE.
|
|
33
33
|
weak_prior → witnessed probe → witnessed → feed to EMIT. "The plan says" / "obviously X" = prior, not fact.
|
|
34
34
|
|
|
35
|
-
|
|
35
|
+
Claims in response prose stand or fall by their last witness. A claim with no witness in this session is a hypothesis, not a finding — say so when you state it, and say what would settle it. The next reader (you, next turn) needs to know which lines were earned and which were carried forward.
|
|
36
36
|
|
|
37
|
-
|
|
37
|
+
## VERIFICATION BUDGET
|
|
38
|
+
|
|
39
|
+
Spend on `.prd` items in descending order of consequence-if-wrong × distance-from-witnessed. Items whose failure would collapse the headline finding must reach witnessed status before EMIT; items with sub-argument-level consequence need at minimum a stated fallback path.
|
|
38
40
|
|
|
39
41
|
## CODE EXECUTION
|
|
40
42
|
|