get-shit-specd 0.2.0 → 0.3.0
This diff represents the content of publicly available package versions that have been released to one of the supported registries. The information contained in this diff is provided for informational purposes only and reflects changes between package versions as they appear in their respective public registries.
- package/README.md +6 -0
- package/claude/get-shit-specd/VERSION +1 -1
- package/claude/get-shit-specd/templates/handoff-to-gsd.md +1 -0
- package/claude/get-shit-specd/templates/scope.md +22 -6
- package/claude/get-shit-specd/workflows/create-spec.md +6 -0
- package/claude/get-shit-specd/workflows/handoff.md +17 -1
- package/package.json +1 -1
package/README.md
CHANGED
|
@@ -140,6 +140,12 @@ bunx get-shit-specd update
|
|
|
140
140
|
|
|
141
141
|
This updates GSS files while preserving your `spec-config.json`.
|
|
142
142
|
|
|
143
|
+
## Acknowledgments
|
|
144
|
+
|
|
145
|
+
GSS was heavily influenced by [get-shit-done (GSD)](https://github.com/glittercowboy/get-shit-done), an execution-focused workflow for Claude Code. Where GSD excels at **building** (phases, plans, atomic commits), GSS focuses on what comes **before** — ensuring you spec the right thing before you build it.
|
|
146
|
+
|
|
147
|
+
They're designed to work together: GSS specs feed into GSD phases.
|
|
148
|
+
|
|
143
149
|
## License
|
|
144
150
|
|
|
145
151
|
MIT
|
|
@@ -1 +1 @@
|
|
|
1
|
-
0.
|
|
1
|
+
0.3.0
|
|
@@ -10,6 +10,7 @@ Translate a Ready spec into engineering-facing requirements. Engineering owns im
|
|
|
10
10
|
|
|
11
11
|
## Outputs
|
|
12
12
|
- Requirement IDs mapped to acceptance scenarios
|
|
13
|
+
- **Traceability matrix** (REQ → Acceptance → Spec section)
|
|
13
14
|
- Risk notes and open questions
|
|
14
15
|
- Success criteria summary
|
|
15
16
|
|
|
@@ -1,24 +1,40 @@
|
|
|
1
1
|
# Scope
|
|
2
2
|
|
|
3
|
-
## In
|
|
4
|
-
|
|
5
|
-
|
|
3
|
+
## In Scope (v1 Outcomes)
|
|
4
|
+
|
|
5
|
+
Requirements use stable IDs: `REQ-{SPEC_ID}-{PRIORITY}-{SEQ}`
|
|
6
|
+
|
|
7
|
+
### P0 — Must Have
|
|
8
|
+
|
|
9
|
+
- **REQ-{{SPEC_ID}}-P0-01:** {{P0_ITEM_1}}
|
|
10
|
+
- **REQ-{{SPEC_ID}}-P0-02:** {{P0_ITEM_2}}
|
|
11
|
+
|
|
12
|
+
### P1 — Should Have
|
|
13
|
+
|
|
14
|
+
- **REQ-{{SPEC_ID}}-P1-01:** {{P1_ITEM_1}}
|
|
15
|
+
|
|
16
|
+
### P2 — Nice to Have
|
|
17
|
+
|
|
18
|
+
- **REQ-{{SPEC_ID}}-P2-01:** {{P2_ITEM_1}}
|
|
19
|
+
|
|
20
|
+
## Out of Scope
|
|
6
21
|
|
|
7
|
-
## Out of scope
|
|
8
22
|
- {{OUT_SCOPE_1}}
|
|
9
23
|
- {{OUT_SCOPE_2}}
|
|
10
24
|
|
|
11
25
|
## Dependencies
|
|
26
|
+
|
|
12
27
|
- {{DEP_1}}
|
|
13
28
|
|
|
14
|
-
## Rollout
|
|
29
|
+
## Rollout Considerations
|
|
15
30
|
|
|
16
31
|
What matters for rollout (engineering determines approach):
|
|
17
32
|
- Gradual exposure needed: {{GRADUAL_YN}}
|
|
18
33
|
- Backout requirement: {{BACKOUT_NEED}}
|
|
19
34
|
- Data migration scope: {{MIGRATION_SCOPE}}
|
|
20
35
|
|
|
21
|
-
## Non-
|
|
36
|
+
## Non-Functional Requirements
|
|
37
|
+
|
|
22
38
|
- Performance: {{PERF}}
|
|
23
39
|
- Accessibility: {{A11Y}}
|
|
24
40
|
- Security/privacy: {{SECURITY}}
|
|
@@ -69,6 +69,12 @@ Main flow writes:
|
|
|
69
69
|
- 00-BRIEF.md (problem, JTBD, goal, constraints, risks)
|
|
70
70
|
- 01-SCOPE.md (in/out with priorities, dependencies, NFRs)
|
|
71
71
|
|
|
72
|
+
**Requirement ID Convention:**
|
|
73
|
+
Generate stable IDs at spec time using format: `REQ-{SPEC_ID}-{PRIORITY}-{SEQ}`
|
|
74
|
+
- Example: REQ-001-P0-01, REQ-001-P1-02
|
|
75
|
+
- IDs remain stable across spec revisions
|
|
76
|
+
- Enables traceability from spec → handoff → implementation
|
|
77
|
+
|
|
72
78
|
These require intake context, so main flow handles them.
|
|
73
79
|
</step>
|
|
74
80
|
|
|
@@ -14,10 +14,26 @@ Read:
|
|
|
14
14
|
</step>
|
|
15
15
|
|
|
16
16
|
<step name="map_requirements">
|
|
17
|
-
|
|
17
|
+
Use requirement IDs from SCOPE (REQ-{SPEC_ID}-{PRIORITY}-{SEQ}).
|
|
18
|
+
Map each requirement to its acceptance scenarios from 04-ACCEPTANCE.md.
|
|
18
19
|
Requirements describe OUTCOMES, not tasks.
|
|
19
20
|
</step>
|
|
20
21
|
|
|
22
|
+
<step name="generate_traceability_matrix">
|
|
23
|
+
Create a traceability matrix linking:
|
|
24
|
+
- Requirement ID → Acceptance scenario numbers → Spec source file:section
|
|
25
|
+
|
|
26
|
+
Example format:
|
|
27
|
+
| REQ ID | Acceptance Scenarios | Source |
|
|
28
|
+
|--------|---------------------|--------|
|
|
29
|
+
| REQ-001-P0-01 | 1.1.1, 1.1.2, 1.1.3 | 01-SCOPE.md#email-signup |
|
|
30
|
+
|
|
31
|
+
This enables:
|
|
32
|
+
- Coverage verification (every REQ has acceptance criteria)
|
|
33
|
+
- Change impact analysis (which acceptance scenarios if REQ changes)
|
|
34
|
+
- Engineering trace-back to product intent
|
|
35
|
+
</step>
|
|
36
|
+
|
|
21
37
|
<step name="summarize_context">
|
|
22
38
|
Extract from BRIEF:
|
|
23
39
|
- Problem statement (why this matters)
|