get-shit-done-cc 1.9.3 → 1.9.6

This diff represents the content of publicly available package versions that have been released to one of the supported registries. The information contained in this diff is provided for informational purposes only and reflects changes between package versions as they appear in their respective public registries.
@@ -174,33 +174,3 @@ It's a DIGEST, not an archive. If accumulated context grows too large:
174
174
  The goal is "read once, know where we are" — if it's too long, that fails.
175
175
 
176
176
  </size_constraint>
177
-
178
- <guidelines>
179
-
180
- **When created:**
181
- - During project initialization (after ROADMAP.md)
182
- - Reference PROJECT.md (extract core value and current focus)
183
- - Initialize empty sections
184
-
185
- **When read:**
186
- - Every workflow starts by reading STATE.md
187
- - Then read PROJECT.md for full context
188
- - Provides instant context restoration
189
-
190
- **When updated:**
191
- - After each plan execution (update position, note decisions, update issues/blockers)
192
- - After phase transitions (update progress bar, clear resolved blockers, refresh project reference)
193
-
194
- **Size management:**
195
- - Keep under 100 lines total
196
- - Recent decisions only in STATE.md (full log in PROJECT.md)
197
- - Keep only active blockers
198
-
199
- **Sections:**
200
- - Project Reference: Pointer to PROJECT.md with core value
201
- - Current Position: Where we are now (phase, plan, status)
202
- - Performance Metrics: Velocity tracking
203
- - Accumulated Context: Recent decisions, pending todos, blockers
204
- - Session Continuity: Resume information
205
-
206
- </guidelines>
@@ -233,37 +233,14 @@ The one-liner should tell someone what actually shipped.
233
233
  </example>
234
234
 
235
235
  <guidelines>
236
- **When to create:**
237
- - After completing each phase plan
238
- - Required output from execute-plan workflow
239
- - Documents what actually happened vs what was planned
240
-
241
- **Frontmatter completion:**
242
- - MANDATORY: Complete all frontmatter fields during summary creation
243
- - See <frontmatter_guidance> for field purposes
244
- - Frontmatter enables automatic context assembly for future planning
245
-
246
- **One-liner requirements:**
247
- - Must be substantive (describe what shipped, not "phase complete")
248
- - Should tell someone what was accomplished
249
- - Examples: "JWT auth with refresh rotation using jose library" not "Authentication implemented"
250
-
251
- **Performance tracking:**
252
- - Include duration, start/end timestamps
253
- - Used for velocity metrics in STATE.md
254
-
255
- **Deviations section:**
256
- - Documents unplanned work handled via deviation rules
257
- - Separate from "Issues Encountered" (which is planned work problems)
258
- - Auto-fixed issues: What was wrong, how fixed, verification
236
+ **Frontmatter:** MANDATORY - complete all fields. Enables automatic context assembly for future planning.
237
+
238
+ **One-liner:** Must be substantive. "JWT auth with refresh rotation using jose library" not "Authentication implemented".
259
239
 
260
240
  **Decisions section:**
261
- - Key decisions made during execution
262
- - Include rationale (why this choice)
241
+ - Key decisions made during execution with rationale
263
242
  - Extracted to STATE.md accumulated context
264
243
  - Use "None - followed plan as specified" if no deviations
265
244
 
266
- **After creation:**
267
- - STATE.md updated with position, decisions, issues
268
- - Next plan can reference decisions made
245
+ **After creation:** STATE.md updated with position, decisions, issues.
269
246
  </guidelines>
@@ -304,20 +304,8 @@ curl -X POST http://localhost:3000/api/test-email \
304
304
 
305
305
  ## Guidelines
306
306
 
307
- **Include in USER-SETUP.md:**
308
- - Environment variable names and where to find values
309
- - Account creation URLs (if new service)
310
- - Dashboard configuration steps
311
- - Verification commands to confirm setup works
312
- - Local development alternatives (e.g., `stripe listen`)
313
-
314
- **Do NOT include:**
315
- - Actual secret values (never)
316
- - Steps Claude can automate (package installs, code changes, file creation)
317
- - Generic instructions ("set up your environment")
307
+ **Never include:** Actual secret values. Steps Claude can automate (package installs, code changes).
318
308
 
319
309
  **Naming:** `{phase}-USER-SETUP.md` matches the phase number pattern.
320
-
321
310
  **Status tracking:** User marks checkboxes and updates status line when complete.
322
-
323
311
  **Searchability:** `grep -r "USER-SETUP" .planning/` finds all phases with user requirements.
@@ -29,12 +29,7 @@ When a milestone completes, this workflow:
29
29
  5. Performs full PROJECT.md evolution review
30
30
  6. Offers to create next milestone inline
31
31
 
32
- **Context Efficiency:**
33
-
34
- - Completed milestones: One line each (~50 tokens)
35
- - Full details: In archive files (loaded only when needed)
36
- - Result: ROADMAP.md stays constant size forever
37
- - Result: REQUIREMENTS.md is always milestone-scoped (not cumulative)
32
+ **Context Efficiency:** Archives keep ROADMAP.md constant-size and REQUIREMENTS.md milestone-scoped.
38
33
 
39
34
  **Archive Format:**
40
35
 
@@ -201,21 +201,8 @@ Do NOT offer manual next steps - verify-work handles the rest.
201
201
  </process>
202
202
 
203
203
  <context_efficiency>
204
- **Orchestrator context:** ~15%
205
- - Parse UAT.md gaps
206
- - Fill template strings
207
- - Spawn parallel Task calls
208
- - Collect results
209
- - Update UAT.md
210
-
211
- **Each debug agent:** Fresh 200k context
212
- - Loads full debug workflow
213
- - Loads debugging references
214
- - Investigates with full capacity
215
- - Returns root cause
216
-
217
- **No symptom gathering.** Agents start with symptoms pre-filled from UAT.
218
- **No fix application.** Agents only diagnose - plan-phase --gaps handles fixes.
204
+ Agents start with symptoms pre-filled from UAT (no symptom gathering).
205
+ Agents only diagnose—plan-phase --gaps handles fixes (no fix application).
219
206
  </context_efficiency>
220
207
 
221
208
  <failure_handling>
@@ -550,24 +550,9 @@ All {N} phases executed.
550
550
  </process>
551
551
 
552
552
  <context_efficiency>
553
- **Why this works:**
554
-
555
- Orchestrator context usage: ~10-15%
556
- - Read plan frontmatter (small)
557
- - Analyze dependencies (logic, no heavy reads)
558
- - Fill template strings
559
- - Spawn Task calls
560
- - Collect results
561
-
562
- Each subagent: Fresh 200k context
563
- - Loads full execute-plan workflow
564
- - Loads templates, references
565
- - Executes plan with full capacity
566
- - Creates SUMMARY, commits
567
-
568
- **No polling.** Task tool blocks until completion. No TaskOutput loops.
569
-
570
- **No context bleed.** Orchestrator never reads workflow internals. Just paths and results.
553
+ Orchestrator: ~10-15% context (frontmatter, spawning, results).
554
+ Subagents: Fresh 200k each (full workflow + execution).
555
+ No polling (Task blocks). No context bleed.
571
556
  </context_efficiency>
572
557
 
573
558
  <failure_handling>
@@ -216,19 +216,7 @@ Tasks 2-5: Main context (need decision from checkpoint 1)
216
216
  No segmentation benefit - execute entirely in main
217
217
  ```
218
218
 
219
- **4. Why this works:**
220
-
221
- **Segmentation benefits:**
222
-
223
- - Fresh context for each autonomous segment (0% start every time)
224
- - Main context only for checkpoints (~10-20% total)
225
- - Can handle 10+ task plans if properly segmented
226
- - Quality impossible to degrade in autonomous segments
227
-
228
- **When segmentation provides no benefit:**
229
-
230
- - Checkpoint is decision/human-action and following tasks depend on outcome
231
- - Better to execute sequentially in main than break flow
219
+ **4. Why segment:** Fresh context per subagent preserves peak quality. Main context stays lean (~15% usage).
232
220
 
233
221
  **5. Implementation:**
234
222
 
@@ -533,18 +521,7 @@ Committing...
533
521
 
534
522
  ````
535
523
 
536
- **Benefits of this pattern:**
537
- - Main context usage: ~20% (just orchestration + checkpoints)
538
- - Subagent 1: Fresh 0-30% (tasks 1-3)
539
- - Subagent 2: Fresh 0-30% (tasks 5-6)
540
- - Subagent 3: Fresh 0-20% (task 8)
541
- - All autonomous work: Peak quality
542
- - Can handle large plans with many tasks if properly segmented
543
-
544
- **When NOT to use segmentation:**
545
- - Plan has decision/human-action checkpoints that affect following tasks
546
- - Following tasks depend on checkpoint outcome
547
- - Better to execute in main sequentially in those cases
524
+ **Benefit:** Each subagent starts fresh (~20-30% context), enabling larger plans without quality degradation.
548
525
  </step>
549
526
 
550
527
  <step name="load_prompt">
@@ -1068,13 +1045,6 @@ Store in array or list for SUMMARY generation:
1068
1045
  TASK_COMMITS+=("Task ${TASK_NUM}: ${TASK_COMMIT}")
1069
1046
  ```
1070
1047
 
1071
- **Atomic commit benefits:**
1072
- - Each task independently revertable
1073
- - Git bisect finds exact failing task
1074
- - Git blame traces line to specific task context
1075
- - Clear history for Claude in future sessions
1076
- - Better observability for AI-automated workflow
1077
-
1078
1048
  </task_commit>
1079
1049
 
1080
1050
  <step name="checkpoint_protocol">
@@ -132,7 +132,7 @@ Wait for user response.
132
132
  Acknowledge the corrections:
133
133
 
134
134
  ```
135
- Got it. Key corrections:
135
+ Key corrections:
136
136
  - [correction 1]
137
137
  - [correction 2]
138
138
 
@@ -142,7 +142,7 @@ This changes my understanding significantly. [Summarize new understanding]
142
142
  **If user confirms assumptions:**
143
143
 
144
144
  ```
145
- Great, assumptions validated.
145
+ Assumptions validated.
146
146
  ```
147
147
 
148
148
  Continue to offer_next.
@@ -7,10 +7,7 @@ Use this workflow when:
7
7
  </trigger>
8
8
 
9
9
  <purpose>
10
- Instantly restore full project context and present clear status.
11
- Enables seamless session continuity for fully autonomous workflows.
12
-
13
- "Where were we?" should have an immediate, complete answer.
10
+ Instantly restore full project context so "Where were we?" has an immediate, complete answer.
14
11
  </purpose>
15
12
 
16
13
  <required_reading>
@@ -290,17 +287,12 @@ This handles cases where:
290
287
  </reconstruction>
291
288
 
292
289
  <quick_resume>
293
- For users who want minimal friction:
294
-
295
- If user says just "continue" or "go":
296
-
290
+ If user says "continue" or "go":
297
291
  - Load state silently
298
292
  - Determine primary action
299
293
  - Execute immediately without presenting options
300
294
 
301
295
  "Continuing from [state]... [action]"
302
-
303
- This enables fully autonomous "just keep going" workflow.
304
296
  </quick_resume>
305
297
 
306
298
  <success_criteria>
@@ -514,15 +514,7 @@ Exit skill and invoke SlashCommand("/gsd:complete-milestone {version}")
514
514
  </process>
515
515
 
516
516
  <implicit_tracking>
517
-
518
- Progress tracking is IMPLICIT:
519
-
520
- - "Plan phase 2" → Phase 1 must be done (or ask)
521
- - "Plan phase 3" → Phases 1-2 must be done (or ask)
522
- - Transition workflow makes it explicit in ROADMAP.md
523
-
524
- No separate "update progress" step. Forward motion IS progress.
525
-
517
+ Progress tracking is IMPLICIT: planning phase N implies phases 1-(N-1) complete. No separate progress step—forward motion IS progress.
526
518
  </implicit_tracking>
527
519
 
528
520
  <partial_completion>
package/package.json CHANGED
@@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
1
1
  {
2
2
  "name": "get-shit-done-cc",
3
- "version": "1.9.3",
3
+ "version": "1.9.6",
4
4
  "description": "A meta-prompting, context engineering and spec-driven development system for Claude Code by TÂCHES.",
5
5
  "bin": {
6
6
  "get-shit-done-cc": "bin/install.js"