gaunt-sloth-assistant 0.3.0 → 0.3.1

package/gth-ASK-2025-05-16T14-43-31.md

@@ -1,51 +0,0 @@
-This `package.json` file is reasonably well-structured. I have a few observations:
-
-*   ✅ **`name`, `version`, `license`, `author`, `type`, `main`, `repository`**: These fields are correctly defined. Using `"type": "module"` is a modern choice.
-*   ✅ **`engines`**: Clearly specifies Node.js `>=22.0.0` and npm `>=10.9.0`. These are very recent versions, which is a deliberate choice that limits broader compatibility but ensures usage of newer features.
-*   ✅ **`scripts`**:
-    *   `build`, `lint`, `format`: Standard and appropriate.
-    *   `test`: `"npm run build && vitest run"` is good practice, ensuring tests run against the compiled output.
-    *   `prepare`: `"npm run build"` is also standard, ensuring the package is built after installation and before publishing.
-*   ✅ **`dependencies`** and **`devDependencies`**: The listed packages are appropriate for the described functionality (Langchain, CLI tools) and development (TypeScript, ESLint, Prettier, Vitest). Versions are up-to-date.
-*   ✅ **`imports`**: The subpath import `"#src/*.js": "./dist/*.js"` is a modern way to define internal package aliases.
-    *   ⚠️ For a smoother development experience with TypeScript, ensure your `tsconfig.json` has a corresponding `paths` alias, for example:
-        ```json
-        {
-          "compilerOptions": {
-            "baseUrl": ".", // Or "./src"
-            "paths": {
-              "#src/*": ["src/*"] // Or just "*" if baseUrl is "./src"
-            }
-          }
-        }
-        ```
-        This allows TypeScript to resolve `#src/...` imports to your source files during development and type-checking.
-
-Now, for more critical points:
-
-*   ❌ **`bin` configuration**:
-    ```json
-    "bin": {
-      "gsloth": "index.js",
-      "gth": "index.js"
-    }
-    ```
-    Your `main` field is `"dist/index.js"`, indicating that your compiled, runnable JavaScript code resides in the `dist` directory. However, your `bin` entries point to `index.js` in the project root.
-    If `index.js` in the root is your TypeScript source file (or does not exist), this will not work when the package is installed globally or used via `npx`. The `bin` entries should point to the executable JavaScript files generated by your build process.
-    Typically, this would be something like:
-    ```json
-    "bin": {
-      "gsloth": "dist/index.js", // Or a specific CLI entry point like "dist/cli.js"
-      "gth": "dist/index.js"    // Same here
-    }
-    ```
-    The target file (e.g., `dist/index.js` or `dist/cli.js`) must be executable and should start with a shebang line (e.g., `#!/usr/bin/env node`). If your main TypeScript entry point (e.g., `src/index.ts` or `src/cli.ts`) includes this shebang, `tsc` usually preserves it in the output JavaScript file.
-
-*   ⚠️ **`description`**: The `description` field is empty.
-    ```json
-    "description": "",
-    ```
-    Providing a concise description is highly recommended. It improves the package's discoverability on npm and helps users understand its purpose quickly.
-
-In summary:
-The most critical issue is the `bin` configuration, which likely needs to be updated to point to files within your `dist` directory. The empty `description` is a minor omission. The `imports` setup is good, but ensure your TypeScript configuration complements it for development.

package/gth-ASK-2025-05-16T16-05-52.md

@@ -1,62 +0,0 @@
-Okay, I've reviewed your `package.json` file. Here's my assessment:
-
-## `package.json` Review
-
-Overall, this `package.json` is well-structured and sets up a modern Node.js TypeScript project with appropriate tooling for LangChain/LangGraph development. However, there are a few points to address.
-
-### ✅ Positive Aspects
-
-*   **Modern Node.js Setup**:
-    *   `"type": "module"`: Correctly enables ES module syntax.
-    *   `"engines"`: Specifying Node.js (`>=22.0.0`) and npm (`>=10.9.0`) versions is good practice for ensuring environment compatibility.
-*   **Build and Development Scripts**:
-    *   `"build": "tsc"`: Standard TypeScript compilation.
-    *   `"test": "npm run build && vitest run"`: Ensures code is built before tests run. `vitest` is a good choice for a modern testing framework.
-    *   `"lint": "eslint . --ext .js,.ts"`: Proper linting setup.
-    *   `"format": "prettier --write 'src/**/*.{js,ts}'"`: Standard code formatting.
-    *   `"prepare": "npm run build"`: Excellent practice to ensure the project is built after installation, making it ready for use, especially if it's a library or a CLI tool.
-*   **Dependencies**:
-    *   The LangChain/LangGraph dependencies (`@langchain/anthropic`, `@langchain/core`, `@langchain/google-vertexai`, `@langchain/groq`, `@langchain/langgraph`) are correctly listed. Using `^` for versioning allows for non-breaking updates.
-    *   Utility dependencies like `chalk`, `commander`, and `uuid` are appropriate for a CLI/assistant type of project.
-*   **Dev Dependencies**:
-    *   A comprehensive set of development tools is included: TypeScript, ESLint (with TypeScript and Prettier plugins), Prettier, and type definitions (`@types/node`, `@types/uuid`).
-*   **Subpath Imports**:
-    *   `"imports": { "#src/*.js": "./dist/*.js" }`: This is a good use of Node.js subpath imports, allowing for cleaner import statements within your compiled code (e.g., `import ... from '#src/module.js'`).
-
-### ⚠️ Areas for Improvement / Potential Issues
-
-*   **Missing Description**:
-    *   The `"description"` field is empty. It's good practice to provide a brief description of your package. This is helpful for `npm search` and general understanding.
-    *   **Recommendation**: Add a concise description.
-*   **`globals` Dependency**:
-    *   The `globals` package is listed in `devDependencies`. While it can be used to define global variables for ESLint, modern ESLint configurations (especially with `@eslint/js` and `@typescript-eslint/parser`) often handle this directly within the ESLint configuration file (e.g., `env` or `globals` sections in `.eslintrc.js`).
-    *   **Recommendation**: Verify if this dependency is actively used and necessary. If your ESLint configuration handles globals sufficiently, this might be redundant.
-
-### ❌ Critical Issues
-
-*   **Incorrect `bin` Path(s)**:
-    *   The `"bin"` field defines CLI commands:
-        ```json
-        "bin": {
-          "gsloth": "index.js",
-          "gth": "index.js"
-        }
-        ```
-    *   However, your `"main"` field is `"dist/index.js"`, and your build script (`tsc`) compiles TypeScript from `src` to `dist`. This strongly suggests that the executable entry point for your CLI should be within the `dist` directory (likely `dist/index.js` or a specific CLI entry file in `dist`).
-    *   Pointing `bin` to `index.js` in the project root will either:
-        1.  Fail if `index.js` doesn't exist or isn't executable.
-        2.  Run the wrong (uncompiled or placeholder) code if an `index.js` exists in the root but isn't the intended compiled entry point.
-    *   **Recommendation**: Change the `bin` paths to point to the compiled JavaScript entry file. For example:
-        ```json
-        "bin": {
-          "gsloth": "dist/index.js",
-          "gth": "dist/index.js"
-        }
-        ```
-        Or, if you have a dedicated CLI entry point, adjust accordingly (e.g., `dist/cli.js`). Ensure the target file has a shebang (e.g., `#!/usr/bin/env node`) if it's meant to be directly executable.
-
-### Summary
-
-The `package.json` is largely well-configured for a TypeScript-based LangChain/LangGraph project. The most critical issue to address is the `bin` path configuration to ensure your CLI commands work correctly after installation. The other points are minor improvements.
-
-Please provide the actual code files (TypeScript/JavaScript) when you're ready for a review of the LangChain/LangGraph logic itself.

package/gth-DIFF-review-2025-05-16T16-07-53.md

@@ -1,56 +0,0 @@
-Greetings. I have reviewed the submitted diff. The changes introduce significant architectural improvements, enhance configuration flexibility, and refine the user experience.
-
-Here is my assessment:
-
-**Architectural and Flow Improvements:**
-*   ✅ The introduction of `src/llmUtils.ts` is a commendable refactoring. Centralizing the LangChain/LangGraph LLM invocation logic into a reusable `invoke` function simplifies the `questionAnsweringModule` and `reviewModule` considerably. This promotes the DRY principle and makes the core LLM interaction logic easier to manage and test.
-*   ✅ The use of `StateGraph`, `MessagesAnnotation`, and `MemorySaver` from `@langchain/langgraph` within `llmUtils.ts` is appropriate for managing the LLM interaction state.
-*   ✅ The separation of prompt concerns into distinct files (`.gsloth.backstory.md`, `.gsloth.guidelines.md`, `.gsloth.review.md`) and corresponding loader functions (`readBackstory`, `readGuidelines`, `readReviewInstructions`) in `src/prompt.ts` provides better organization and clarity for prompt engineering.
-*   ✅ Handling of standard input (`stdin`) has been cleanly moved to `src/systemUtils.ts` and cached, which is a more logical placement.
-
-**Configuration Enhancements:**
-*   ✅ The `SlothConfig` interface and default configurations in `src/config.ts` have been updated to include `projectGuidelines` and `projectReviewInstructions`. This allows for more tailored prompting.
-*   ✅ The type hint for the LLM instance in `SlothConfig` has been refined from `LanguageModelLike` to the more specific `BaseChatModel`.
-*   ✅ Documentation (`README.md`, `docs/CONFIGURATION.md`) and initialization logic (`initCommand`) have been updated to reflect the new configuration file names (e.g., `.gsloth.guidelines.md`).
-
-**Code Quality and Testing:**
-*   ✅ Test suites (`*.spec.ts`) have been diligently updated to reflect the refactoring. Mocks are handled more cleanly (e.g., top-level `vi.mock`), and tests cover the new `llmUtils.ts` and changes in existing modules.
-*   ✅ The new output file prefix `gth-` (e.g., `gth-ASK`, `gth-DIFF-review`) is consistently applied across the codebase and tests, and is now included in `.gitignore`.
-*   ✅ TypeScript types are used effectively, and improvements have been made (e.g., `BaseChatModel`).
-*   ✅ The new global `--verbose` option in `src/index.ts` for enabling detailed LLM prompt logging is a useful debugging feature.
-
-**User Experience:**
-*   ✅ The `ProgressIndicator` in `src/utils.ts` has been significantly improved. It now provides continuous feedback for long-running operations by default and includes a `stop()` method for clean termination. It also supports a manual indication mode.
-
-**Specific Feedback & Suggestions:**
-
-*   ⚠️ **Security Suggestion (Important):** In `src/commands/reviewCommand.ts`, there's a `TODO` comment regarding `prId` sanitization:
-    ```typescript
-    // src/commands/reviewCommand.ts
-    // ...
-    // TODO sanitize prId
-    await review(`gth-PR-${prId}-review`, systemMessage.join('\n'), content.join('\n'));
-    ```
-    If `prId` can be influenced by user input (e.g., from a command-line argument that might not be strictly numeric or could contain path characters), it's crucial to sanitize it before using it in a filename. This prevents potential path traversal or other file system vulnerabilities. Please ensure `prId` is appropriately validated or sanitized.
-
-*   ✅ **Refactoring of `reviewInner` and `askQuestionInner`:** The logic previously in these internal functions has been effectively moved to the generic `llmUtils.invoke` function. This is a good simplification.
-
-*   ✅ **File Reading Utilities:** The new `readFileFromCurrentOrInstallDir` utility in `src/utils.ts` is a good addition for robustly loading configuration/prompt files.
-
-*   ⚠️ **Nitpick (Minor):** In `src/modules/questionAnsweringModule.ts`, the comment:
-    ```typescript
-    // TODO highlight LLM output with something like Prism.JS (maybe system emoj are enough ????????????)
-    ```
-    The series of question marks makes it appear less formal than typical `TODO` comments. This is a minor point of style.
-
-**Overall:**
-
-The submitted changes are of high quality and represent a significant improvement in the codebase's structure, maintainability, and user experience. The refactoring to centralize LLM interaction is particularly noteworthy.
-
----
-
-**Recommendation:**
-
-✅ **I recommend approving this PR.**
-
-The changes are largely excellent. The primary point to consider before merging is the `prId` sanitization mentioned above to ensure robustness against potentially malformed inputs. The other points are minor.

package/gth-DIFF-review-2025-05-16T16-18-55.md

@@ -1,292 +0,0 @@
-Okay, let's examine this diff.
-
-## Code Review
-
-### `.gitignore`
-*   `+ /gth-*`
-    *   ✅ **Suggestion:** Adding `gth-*` to `.gitignore` is a good practice if these are generated files (e.g., output from the tool, which seems to be the case with the prefix change from `sloth-*` to `gth-*`). This prevents accidental commits of transient data.
-
-### `.gsloth.guidelines.md` & `.gsloth.review.md`
-*   The changes in `.gsloth.guidelines.md` remove instructions for *me* (the reviewer bot) from the guidelines file.
-*   The new file `.gsloth.review.md` now contains these instructions.
-    *   ✅ **Observation:** This is a sensible refactoring to separate the project's code review guidelines from the instructions for the AI reviewer.
-
-### `README.md` & `docs/CONFIGURATION.md`
-*   `s/.gsloth.preamble.review.md/.gsloth.guidelines.md/g`
-    *   ✅ **Documentation:** The documentation has been updated to reflect the renaming of the primary user-provided guidelines file from `.gsloth.preamble.review.md` to `.gsloth.guidelines.md`. This is consistent with other changes.
-
-### `spec/askCommand.spec.ts`
-*   **Mocking Strategy:**
-    *   The mocking strategy has been changed from using `vi.hoisted()` and a `ctx` object to defining mocks at the top level and using `vi.mock()`.
-        *   ✅ **Suggestion:** This is generally a cleaner and more standard way to handle mocks in Vitest. It improves readability.
-*   **Preamble/Guideline Handling:**
-    *   `ctx.prompt.readInternalPreamble.mockReturnValue('INTERNAL PREAMBLE');` changed to:
-        ```typescript
-        prompt.readBackstory.mockReturnValue('INTERNAL PREAMBLE');
-        prompt.readGuidelines.mockReturnValue('PROJECT GUIDELINES');
-        ```
-    *   The `askQuestion` mock is now expected to be called with a combined preamble: `'INTERNAL PREAMBLE\nPROJECT GUIDELINES'`.
-        *   ✅ **Correctness:** This aligns with the changes in `src/commands/askCommand.ts` where both backstory and project guidelines are now read and combined.
-*   **Output File Prefix:**
-    *   `expect(ctx.questionAnsweringModule.askQuestion).toHaveBeenCalledWith('sloth-ASK', ...)` changed to `expect(askQuestion).toHaveBeenCalledWith('gth-ASK', ...)`.
-        *   ✅ **Correctness:** Reflects the change in the default output file prefix.
-*   **General Test Logic:**
-    *   The tests correctly adapt to the new way preambles are constructed and the new output prefix.
-    *   ✅ **Test Coverage:** The tests cover cases with a message only, with a single file, and with multiple files.
-
-### `spec/config.spec.ts`
-*   **New Default Config Values:**
-    *   Tests now expect `projectGuidelines: '.gsloth.guidelines.md'` and `projectReviewInstructions: '.gsloth.review.md'` in the default configuration.
-        *   ✅ **Correctness:** This is consistent with the introduction of these new configuration options and their default file names.
-*   **Type Safety:**
-    *   The tests for various LLM configurations (`vertexai`, `anthropic`, `groq`) correctly include these new default string properties.
-        *   ✅ **Consistency:** Ensures that all configuration paths are tested with the new defaults.
-
-### `spec/initCommand.spec.ts`
-*   `USER_PROJECT_REVIEW_PREAMBLE: '.gsloth.preamble.review.md'` changed to `USER_PROJECT_REVIEW_PREAMBLE: '.gsloth.guidelines.md'`.
-    *   ✅ **Correctness:** The test mock for `config.js` now uses the updated constant name for the project guidelines file, aligning with the changes in `src/config.ts`.
-
-### `spec/llmUtils.spec.ts`
-*   This is a new test file for the new `src/llmUtils.ts`.
-*   **`invoke` Function Test:**
-    *   It tests the `invoke` function with a `FakeListChatModel`.
-    *   It correctly mocks the `SlothContext` (though it's simplified for this test, which is acceptable for a unit test of `invoke`).
-    *   The test verifies that the `invoke` function returns the content of the first LLM message.
-        *   ⚠️ **Suggestion:** The test for `invoke` is quite basic. It checks if *a* message is returned. It might be beneficial to also assert:
-            *   That the `llm.invoke` method was called with the correct `SystemMessage` and `HumanMessage` constructed from the input `systemMessage` and `prompt`.
-            *   That the `options` (like `configurable: { thread_id: ... }`) are passed through to the LangGraph app invocation.
-            *   If `llm.verbose` is set when `llmGlobalSettings.verbose` is true (though this might be better as a separate test for `setVerbose`'s effect).
-    *   The removal of `SlothContext` type import is fine as the test constructs a minimal context.
-    *   ✅ **Unit Test:** A good starting point for testing the core LLM invocation logic.
-
-### `spec/questionAnsweringModule.spec.ts`
-*   **Refactoring:**
-    *   The test for `askQuestionInner` has been removed, which is correct as this function was inlined/refactored into `llmUtils.invoke`.
-*   **`ProgressIndicator` Mocking:**
-    *   `utilsMock.ProgressIndicator.prototype.stop = vi.fn();`
-    *   `utilsMock.ProgressIndicator.prototype.indicate = vi.fn();`
-        *   ✅ **Correctness:** Mocks the new `stop()` method and the existing `indicate()` method of the `ProgressIndicator`.
-*   **Output File Prefix:**
-    *   `utilsMock.toFileSafeString.mockReturnValue('sloth-ASK');` changed to `utilsMock.toFileSafeString.mockReturnValue('gth-ASK');`.
-    *   `pathMock.resolve` mock adapted accordingly.
-        *   ✅ **Correctness:** Aligns with the prefix change.
-*   **`invoke` Call:**
-    *   The tests now implicitly test the `invoke` function via `askQuestion`.
-*   **Error Handling:**
-    *   The test for file write errors remains and is still relevant.
-    *   ✅ **Test Coverage:** Ensures that `displayError` is called and `ProgressIndicator.stop()` is called in error scenarios.
-
-### `spec/reviewCommand.spec.ts`
-*   **Preamble/Guideline Handling:**
-    *   Mocks for `prompt.readInternalPreamble` and `prompt.readPreamble` are replaced with mocks for `prompt.readBackstory`, `prompt.readGuidelines`, and `prompt.readReviewInstructions`.
-    *   The expected combined preamble string reflects this change: `'INTERNAL BACKSTORY\nPROJECT GUIDELINES\nREVIEW INSTRUCTIONS'`.
-        *   ✅ **Correctness:** Aligns with changes in `src/commands/reviewCommand.ts`.
-*   **Output File Prefix:**
-    *   `sloth-DIFF-review` to `gth-DIFF-review`.
-    *   `sloth-PR-123-review` to `gth-PR-123-review`.
-        *   ✅ **Correctness:** Reflects the prefix change.
-*   **`stdin` Handling:**
-    *   The tests involving `stdin` (e.g., "Should call review with stdin content") have been updated. The way `slothContext` is mocked for these tests has changed slightly (e.g., removing `stdin: ''` from the direct mock of `slothContext` as it's now handled by `systemUtils.getStringFromStdin`).
-        *   ⚠️ **Attention:** The tests for `stdin` now rely on the global `slothContext` from `#src/config.js`. While this works, it makes the tests less isolated. It might be cleaner to mock `getStringFromStdin` from `#src/systemUtils.js` directly within these specific tests if the goal is to unit test the command's logic independent of the `systemUtils` implementation. However, given the current structure, this is functional.
-*   **`SlothContext` Mocking:**
-    *   The way `SlothContext` is constructed for tests involving specific providers (like Jira) has been updated. It now casts a partial `SlothConfig` to `SlothConfig`. This is a common pattern in testing.
-        *   ✅ **Test Setup:** The setup for different content/requirements providers seems correct and adapted to the changes.
-
-### `spec/reviewModule.spec.ts`
-*   **Refactoring:**
-    *   The test for `reviewInner` is removed, consistent with its refactoring.
-*   **New Mocks:**
-    *   Extensive mocking for `fs`, `path`, `systemUtils`, `consoleUtils`, `utils`, and the new `llmUtils`.
-        *   ✅ **Thoroughness:** Good setup for testing the `review` function in isolation.
-*   **`llmUtils.invoke` Mocking:**
-    *   `llmUtilsMock.invoke.mockResolvedValue('LLM Review Response');`
-    *   The test verifies that `llmUtils.invoke` is called with the correct parameters.
-        *   ✅ **Correctness:** This is the primary integration point with the new LLM utility.
-*   **File Operations:**
-    *   Verifies `fs.writeFileSync` is called with the correct path and content.
-    *   Tests error handling for `writeFileSync`.
-        *   ✅ **Robustness:** Covers success and failure paths for file writing.
-*   **`ProgressIndicator`:**
-    *   Verifies `ProgressIndicator.prototype.stop` is called.
-        *   ✅ **Correctness:** Ensures progress indication is properly managed.
-*   **Output File Prefix:**
-    *   `utilsMock.toFileSafeString.mockReturnValue('gth-REVIEW');`
-        *   ✅ **Correctness:** Aligns with prefix change.
-
-### `src/commands/askCommand.ts`
-*   **Preamble/Guideline Reading:**
-    *   `readInternalPreamble()` changed to `readBackstory()` and `readGuidelines(slothContext.config.projectGuidelines)`.
-    *   The preamble is now a combination of these two.
-        *   ✅ **Logic Change:** Correctly implements the new way of constructing the system message for the LLM.
-*   **Output File Prefix:**
-    *   `sloth-ASK` changed to `gth-ASK`.
-    *   `// TODO make the prefix configurable`
-        *   ✅ **Enhancement Noted:** Good that this is marked as a TODO.
-*   **`slothContext` Usage:**
-    *   Uses `slothContext.config.projectGuidelines` to fetch the guidelines file path.
-        *   ✅ **Configuration:** Correctly uses the configured path.
-
-### `src/commands/reviewCommand.ts`
-*   **Preamble/Guideline Reading:**
-    *   Similar to `askCommand`, it now uses `readBackstory()`, `readGuidelines(slothContext.config.projectGuidelines)`, and `readReviewInstructions(slothContext.config.projectReviewInstructions)`.
-        *   ✅ **Logic Change:** Correctly implements the new system message construction.
-*   **`stdin` Handling:**
-    *   `if (context.stdin)` changed to `let stringFromStdin = getStringFromStdin(); if (stringFromStdin)`.
-        *   ✅ **Refactoring:** Uses the new centralized way to get stdin content via `getStringFromStdin` from `systemUtils.ts`. This is a good separation of concerns.
-*   **Output File Prefix:**
-    *   `sloth-DIFF-review` to `gth-DIFF-review`.
-    *   `sloth-PR-${prId}-review` to `gth-PR-${prId}-review`.
-    *   `// TODO make the prefix configurable`
-    *   `// TODO consider including requirements id`
-    *   `// TODO sanitize prId`
-        *   ✅ **Enhancements Noted:** Important TODOs, especially sanitizing `prId` for file system safety.
-*   **`SlothContext` Usage:**
-    *   The command no longer takes `context: SlothContext` as a direct argument to the main action but uses the global `slothContext` for config values. The `program.command().action()` still receives `context` from Commander, but it's not the `SlothContext` we define. This is a subtle but important change. The `reviewCommand` function signature itself still takes `context: SlothContext` but it's the global one.
-        *   ⚠️ **Clarity/Potential Confusion:** The `context` parameter in `reviewCommand(program: Command, context: SlothContext)` refers to the global `slothContext`. Inside the `.action(async (contentId: string | undefined, options: ReviewCommandOptions) => { ... })`, if `context` were used, it would be Commander's context. The code correctly uses the global `slothContext` from import. This is fine, but worth noting the distinction.
-
-### `src/config.ts`
-*   **New Config Properties:**
-    *   `projectGuidelines: string;`
-    *   `projectReviewInstructions: string;`
-        *   ✅ **Feature:** Adds new configurable paths for different types of prompt files.
-*   **Type Change for `llm`:**
-    *   `LanguageModelLike` to `BaseChatModel`.
-        *   ✅ **Type Safety:** `BaseChatModel` is more specific and appropriate for chat-based interactions, which LangChain.js is heavily geared towards. This is a good refinement.
-*   **Removal of `stdin` from `SlothContext`:**
-    *   `stdin: string;` removed.
-        *   ✅ **Refactoring:** `stdin` is now handled by `systemUtils.ts`, which is a better place for system-level input.
-*   **New Constants and Default Values:**
-    *   `PROJECT_GUIDELINES = '.gsloth.guidelines.md';`
-    *   `PROJECT_REVIEW_INSTRUCTIONS = '.gsloth.review.md';`
-    *   `USER_PROJECT_REVIEW_PREAMBLE` constant renamed/replaced by `PROJECT_GUIDELINES`.
-    *   `DEFAULT_CONFIG` updated with these new properties.
-        *   ✅ **Consistency:** All changes align with the new file naming and configuration structure.
-*   **`writeProjectReviewPreamble` function:**
-    *   Now writes to `PROJECT_GUIDELINES` (formerly `USER_PROJECT_REVIEW_PREAMBLE`).
-    *   The default content and warning messages are updated to reflect the new file name.
-        *   ✅ **Correctness:** Updates initialization logic.
-*   **`reset` function:**
-    *   `slothContext.stdin = '';` removed.
-        *   ✅ **Correctness:** Consistent with `stdin` removal from context.
-
-### `src/configs/anthropic.ts` & `src/configs/vertexai.ts`
-*   **Type Change:**
-    *   Return type of `processJsonConfig` changed from `Promise<LanguageModelLike>` to `Promise<BaseChatModel>`.
-        *   ✅ **Type Safety:** Consistent with the type change in `SlothConfig`.
-
-### `src/index.ts`
-*   **New Global Option `--verbose`:**
-    *   `program.option('--verbose', 'Print entire prompt sent to LLM.');`
-    *   `program.parseOptions(argv);`
-    *   `if (program.getOptionValue('verbose')) { setVerbose(true); }`
-        *   ✅ **Feature:** Adds a useful debugging feature. Parsing options before command binding is correct for global options.
-*   **`readStdin` Import:**
-    *   Imported from `systemUtils.js` instead of `utils.js`.
-        *   ✅ **Refactoring:** Correctly reflects the move of this utility.
-
-### `src/llmUtils.ts`
-*   This is a new, crucial file.
-*   **`invoke` function:**
-    *   Uses LangGraph (`StateGraph`, `MessagesAnnotation`, `MemorySaver`, `START`, `END`) to structure the LLM call.
-        *   ✅ **Architecture:** Using LangGraph provides a structured way to manage conversations, even if it's a single turn for now. It allows for easier extension to multi-turn conversations or more complex flows later.
-    *   Constructs `SystemMessage` and `HumanMessage`.
-    *   Handles LLM invocation and extracts the content from the last `AIMessageChunk`.
-    *   `llm.verbose = true;` if `llmGlobalSettings.verbose` is set.
-        *   ✅ **Debugging:** Integrates the verbose option.
-    *   ⚠️ **Error Handling:** The `invoke` function itself doesn't have explicit try-catch blocks for the `app.invoke` call. Errors from the LLM or graph execution would propagate up. This might be acceptable if handled by the callers (`askQuestion`, `review`), which they seem to do for file writing but not explicitly for the LLM call itself (though the `ProgressIndicator` might implicitly handle some visual feedback). Consider if more specific error handling or logging is needed directly within `invoke`.
-    *   ⚠️ **MemorySaver:** `const memory = new MemorySaver();` is created for each `invoke` call. If the `thread_id` in `options` is intended to persist memory across calls *within the same command execution but different logical invocations* (which is not the current pattern but could be a future one), this `MemorySaver` instance would be new each time. For the current single-call-per-command structure, this is fine. If true multi-turn state persistence across separate CLI executions is desired, `MemorySaver` would need to be configured with a persistent checkpointer.
-*   **`setVerbose` function:**
-    *   Sets a global flag for verbose LLM logging.
-        *   ✅ **Utility:** Simple and effective.
-
-### `src/modules/questionAnsweringModule.ts`
-*   **Refactoring:**
-    *   `askQuestionInner` removed.
-    *   Now calls `invoke` from `llmUtils.ts`.
-        *   ✅ **Abstraction:** Good use of the new utility function.
-*   **`ProgressIndicator` Usage:**
-    *   `progressIndicator.stop();` is called after `invoke` completes.
-        *   ✅ **Correctness:** Ensures the indicator is stopped.
-*   **Error Handling:**
-    *   The existing `try-catch` for `writeFileSync` remains. Errors from `invoke` would propagate and potentially lead to an unhandled rejection if not caught by a higher-level mechanism (e.g., Node.js default behavior).
-        *   ⚠️ **Robustness:** While file write errors are handled, consider if errors from the `invoke` call itself (e.g., API errors from the LLM) should be caught and presented more gracefully to the user, perhaps with a specific message before falling into the file write error or generic exit.
-
-### `src/modules/reviewModule.ts`
-*   **Refactoring:**
-    *   `reviewInner` removed.
-    *   Now calls `invoke` from `llmUtils.ts`.
-        *   ✅ **Abstraction:** Good use of the new utility function.
-*   **`ProgressIndicator` Usage:**
-    *   `progressIndicator.stop();` is called after `invoke` completes.
-        *   ✅ **Correctness:** Ensures the indicator is stopped.
-*   **Error Handling:**
-    *   Similar to `questionAnsweringModule`, file write errors are handled. Errors from `invoke` might not be specifically caught here.
-        *   ⚠️ **Robustness:** Same consideration as for `questionAnsweringModule` regarding errors from `invoke`.
-
-### `src/prompt.ts`
-*   **Function Renaming and Logic Changes:**
-    *   `readInternalPreamble` -> `readBackstory`. Now uses `readFileFromCurrentOrInstallDir`.
-    *   `readPreamble` -> `readGuidelines`. Now uses `readFileFromCurrentDir` and has more specific error messaging.
-    *   New `readReviewInstructions` function, uses `readConfigPromptFile` (which is `readFileFromCurrentOrInstallDir`).
-        *   ✅ **Clarity & Flexibility:** The new function names are more descriptive. The use of `readFileFromCurrentOrInstallDir` for `readBackstory` and `readReviewInstructions` allows users to override these if needed, while `readGuidelines` enforces it from the current project directory. This seems like a reasonable design.
-*   **Error Handling:**
-    *   The error messages are more specific and guide the user towards `gsloth init`.
-        *   ✅ **User Experience:** Improved error guidance.
-
-### `src/systemUtils.ts`
-*   **New `getStringFromStdin()`:**
-    *   Returns the cached `innerState.stringFromStdin`.
-        *   ✅ **Utility:** Provides a clean way to access stdin content after it has been read.
-*   **`readStdin()` function:**
-    *   Moved from `utils.ts`.
-    *   Logic updated: `ProgressIndicator` is now instantiated with `manual = true` when reading stdin, and `indicate()` is called inside the `readable` event.
-    *   It now populates `innerState.stringFromStdin` instead of `slothContext.stdin`.
-        *   ✅ **Refactoring & Correctness:** This is a much cleaner way to handle stdin. The progress indication is more accurate. Storing it in `innerState` is good for encapsulation within this module.
-*   **`ProgressIndicator` in `readStdin`:**
-    *   `const progressIndicator = new ProgressIndicator('reading STDIN', true);`
-    *   `progressIndicator.indicate();`
-        *   ⚠️ **Nitpick/Minor:** The `ProgressIndicator` in `readStdin` is not explicitly `stop()`-ed. Since `readStdin` resolves its promise after `program.parseAsync()` which happens on `stdin.on('end')`, the "reading STDIN" message with dots might remain on the screen if other operations are quick. It might be cleaner to call `progressIndicator.stop()` right before `resolvePromise()` in the `end` event handler. However, subsequent output will likely overwrite it, so it's a minor visual point.
-
-### `src/utils.ts`
-*   **Removal of `readStdin`:**
-    *   Correctly removed as it's now in `systemUtils.ts`.
-*   **New `readFileFromCurrentOrInstallDir()`:**
-    *   Tries to read from the current directory first, then falls back to the install directory.
-    *   Includes logging about which path it's trying.
-        *   ✅ **Utility & Robustness:** Useful function for accessing configuration/template files that can be overridden by the user.
-*   **`ProgressIndicator` Class Changes:**
-    *   Constructor now takes an optional `manual` flag. If not manual, it starts an interval timer to print dots.
-    *   `indicate()` method now throws an error if called in non-manual mode.
-    *   New `stop()` method to clear the interval and print a newline.
-        *   ✅ **Enhancement:** This makes the `ProgressIndicator` more versatile. The automatic dot printing is convenient for long-running async tasks where manual indication is cumbersome. The `stop()` method is crucial for cleaning up and ensuring the prompt is clean.
-*   **`spawnCommand` `ProgressIndicator`:**
-    *   `const progressIndicator = new ProgressIndicator(progressMessage, true);`
-    *   The `indicate()` calls within `spawnCommand` are now correct for the manual mode.
-    *   `progressIndicator.stop()` is called in both `close` and `error` handlers.
-        *   ✅ **Correctness:** Proper usage of the updated `ProgressIndicator`.
-
-## Overall Assessment
-
-This is a substantial refactoring and feature addition. The changes are largely positive:
-
-*   **Improved Configuration:** More granular control over prompt files (`.gsloth.guidelines.md`, `.gsloth.review.md`).
-*   **Centralized LLM Logic:** The new `llmUtils.ts` with the `invoke` function using LangGraph is a significant architectural improvement. It centralizes LLM interaction and makes it easier to manage and extend.
-*   **Refined `stdin` Handling:** Moving `stdin` processing to `systemUtils.ts` and caching the result is cleaner.
-*   **Enhanced `ProgressIndicator`:** The utility is now more flexible.
-*   **Code Clarity:** Renaming of functions and constants (e.g., `readBackstory`, `PROJECT_GUIDELINES`) improves readability.
-*   **Type Safety:** Consistent use of `BaseChatModel` is good.
-*   **Test Updates:** Tests have been diligently updated to reflect the changes, and new tests for `llmUtils.ts` and `reviewModule.ts` have been added.
-
-**Minor areas for consideration/improvement:**
-*   More detailed unit tests for `llmUtils.invoke` to assert message construction.
-*   Explicit error handling for LLM API calls within `invoke` or its callers (`reviewModule`, `questionAnsweringModule`) for more user-friendly error messages.
-*   Nitpick about `ProgressIndicator.stop()` in `systemUtils.readStdin`.
-*   The TODOs noted in the code (configurable prefix, sanitizing `prId`) are important for future work.
-
-The developer has demonstrated a good understanding of the LangChain.js/LangGraph.js ecosystem and has applied it effectively. The code quality is high, and the changes are well-reasoned.
-
-## Recommendation
-
-✅ **Approve**
-
-This PR introduces significant improvements to the tool's architecture, configurability, and maintainability. The changes are well-implemented and tested. The minor points raised are suggestions for further refinement rather than blocking issues.