froid-plane-test-architecture-enterprise 1.23.4

package/src/agents/froid-tea/resources/knowledge/probability-impact.md

@@ -0,0 +1,593 @@
+# Probability and Impact Scale
+
+## Principle
+
+Risk scoring uses a **probability × impact** matrix (1-9 scale) to prioritize testing efforts. Higher scores (6-9) demand immediate action; lower scores (1-3) require documentation only. This systematic approach ensures testing resources focus on the highest-value risks.
+
+## Rationale
+
+**The Problem**: Without quantifiable risk assessment, teams over-test low-value scenarios while missing critical risks. Gut feeling leads to inconsistent prioritization and missed edge cases.
+
+**The Solution**: Standardize risk evaluation with a 3×3 matrix (probability: 1-3, impact: 1-3). Multiply to derive risk score (1-9). Automate classification (DOCUMENT, MONITOR, MITIGATE, BLOCK) based on thresholds. This approach surfaces hidden risks early and justifies testing decisions to stakeholders.
+
+**Why This Matters**:
+
+- Consistent risk language across product, engineering, and QA
+- Objective prioritization of test scenarios (not politics)
+- Automatic gate decisions (score=9 → FAIL until resolved)
+- Audit trail for compliance and retrospectives
+
+## Pattern Examples
+
+### Example 1: Probability-Impact Matrix Implementation (Automated Classification)
+
+**Context**: Implement a reusable risk scoring system with automatic threshold classification
+
+**Implementation**:
+
+```typescript
+// src/testing/risk-matrix.ts
+
+/**
+ * Probability levels:
+ * 1 = Unlikely (standard implementation, low uncertainty)
+ * 2 = Possible (edge cases or partial unknowns)
+ * 3 = Likely (known issues, new integrations, high ambiguity)
+ */
+export type Probability = 1 | 2 | 3;
+
+/**
+ * Impact levels:
+ * 1 = Minor (cosmetic issues or easy workarounds)
+ * 2 = Degraded (partial feature loss or manual workaround)
+ * 3 = Critical (blockers, data/security/regulatory exposure)
+ */
+export type Impact = 1 | 2 | 3;
+
+/**
+ * Risk score (probability × impact): 1-9
+ */
+export type RiskScore = 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9;
+
+/**
+ * Action categories based on risk score thresholds
+ */
+export type RiskAction = 'DOCUMENT' | 'MONITOR' | 'MITIGATE' | 'BLOCK';
+
+export type RiskAssessment = {
+  probability: Probability;
+  impact: Impact;
+  score: RiskScore;
+  action: RiskAction;
+  reasoning: string;
+};
+
+/**
+ * Calculate risk score: probability × impact
+ */
+export function calculateRiskScore(probability: Probability, impact: Impact): RiskScore {
+  return (probability * impact) as RiskScore;
+}
+
+/**
+ * Classify risk action based on score thresholds:
+ * - 1-3: DOCUMENT (awareness only)
+ * - 4-5: MONITOR (watch closely, plan mitigations)
+ * - 6-8: MITIGATE (CONCERNS at gate until mitigated)
+ * - 9: BLOCK (automatic FAIL until resolved or waived)
+ */
+export function classifyRiskAction(score: RiskScore): RiskAction {
+  if (score >= 9) return 'BLOCK';
+  if (score >= 6) return 'MITIGATE';
+  if (score >= 4) return 'MONITOR';
+  return 'DOCUMENT';
+}
+
+/**
+ * Full risk assessment with automatic classification
+ */
+export function assessRisk(params: { probability: Probability; impact: Impact; reasoning: string }): RiskAssessment {
+  const { probability, impact, reasoning } = params;
+
+  const score = calculateRiskScore(probability, impact);
+  const action = classifyRiskAction(score);
+
+  return { probability, impact, score, action, reasoning };
+}
+
+/**
+ * Generate risk matrix visualization (3x3 grid)
+ * Returns markdown table with color-coded scores
+ */
+export function generateRiskMatrix(): string {
+  const matrix: string[][] = [];
+  const header = ['Impact \\ Probability', 'Unlikely (1)', 'Possible (2)', 'Likely (3)'];
+  matrix.push(header);
+
+  const impactLabels = ['Critical (3)', 'Degraded (2)', 'Minor (1)'];
+  for (let impact = 3; impact >= 1; impact--) {
+    const row = [impactLabels[3 - impact]];
+    for (let probability = 1; probability <= 3; probability++) {
+      const score = calculateRiskScore(probability as Probability, impact as Impact);
+      const action = classifyRiskAction(score);
+      const emoji = action === 'BLOCK' ? '🔴' : action === 'MITIGATE' ? '🟠' : action === 'MONITOR' ? '🟡' : '🟢';
+      row.push(`${emoji} ${score}`);
+    }
+    matrix.push(row);
+  }
+
+  return matrix.map((row) => `| ${row.join(' | ')} |`).join('\n');
+}
+```
+
+**Key Points**:
+
+- Type-safe probability/impact (1-3 enforced at compile time)
+- Automatic action classification (DOCUMENT, MONITOR, MITIGATE, BLOCK)
+- Visual matrix generation for documentation
+- Risk score formula: `probability * impact` (max = 9)
+- Threshold-based decision rules (6-8 = MITIGATE, 9 = BLOCK)
+
+---
+
+### Example 2: Risk Assessment Workflow (Test Planning Integration)
+
+**Context**: Apply risk matrix during test design to prioritize scenarios
+
+**Implementation**:
+
+```typescript
+// tests/e2e/test-planning/risk-assessment.ts
+import { assessRisk, generateRiskMatrix, type RiskAssessment } from '../../../src/testing/risk-matrix';
+
+export type TestScenario = {
+  id: string;
+  title: string;
+  feature: string;
+  risk: RiskAssessment;
+  testLevel: 'E2E' | 'API' | 'Unit';
+  priority: 'P0' | 'P1' | 'P2' | 'P3';
+  owner: string;
+};
+
+/**
+ * Priority is a separate judgment, not a function of risk score.
+ *
+ * Risk score classifies the remediation ACTION required (DOCUMENT/MONITOR/MITIGATE/BLOCK, see
+ * classifyRiskAction above). Priority (P0-P3) is assigned using the business-impact decision
+ * tree in test-priorities-matrix.md, which the risk score informs but does not determine. Two
+ * scenarios with the same score can carry different priorities depending on revenue impact,
+ * user reach, and workaround availability.
+ */
+
+/**
+ * Example: Payment flow risk assessment
+ * Priority below follows the test-priorities-matrix.md decision tree, informed by (not derived
+ * from) the risk score.
+ */
+export const paymentScenarios: TestScenario[] = [
+  {
+    id: 'PAY-001',
+    title: 'Valid credit card payment completes successfully',
+    feature: 'Checkout',
+    risk: assessRisk({
+      probability: 2, // Possible (standard Stripe integration)
+      impact: 3, // Critical (revenue loss if broken)
+      reasoning: 'Core revenue flow, but Stripe is well-tested',
+    }),
+    priority: 'P0', // Revenue-critical core journey
+    testLevel: 'E2E',
+    owner: 'qa-team',
+  },
+  {
+    id: 'PAY-002',
+    title: 'Expired credit card shows user-friendly error',
+    feature: 'Checkout',
+    risk: assessRisk({
+      probability: 3, // Likely (edge case handling often buggy)
+      impact: 2, // Degraded (users see error, but can retry)
+      reasoning: 'Error handling logic is custom and complex',
+    }),
+    priority: 'P1', // Core user journey, frequent error path
+    testLevel: 'E2E',
+    owner: 'qa-team',
+  },
+  {
+    id: 'PAY-003',
+    title: 'Payment confirmation email formatting is correct',
+    feature: 'Email',
+    risk: assessRisk({
+      probability: 2, // Possible (template changes occasionally break)
+      impact: 1, // Minor (cosmetic issue, email still sent)
+      reasoning: 'Non-blocking, users get email regardless',
+    }),
+    priority: 'P2', // Customer-facing presentation, with email still delivered
+    testLevel: 'Unit',
+    owner: 'dev-team',
+  },
+  {
+    id: 'PAY-004',
+    title: 'Payment fails gracefully when Stripe is down',
+    feature: 'Checkout',
+    risk: assessRisk({
+      probability: 1, // Unlikely (Stripe has 99.99% uptime)
+      impact: 3, // Critical (complete checkout failure)
+      reasoning: 'Rare but catastrophic, requires retry mechanism',
+    }),
+    priority: 'P0', // Revenue-critical checkout failure with no workaround
+    testLevel: 'API',
+    owner: 'qa-team',
+  },
+];
+
+/**
+ * Generate risk assessment report with priority distribution
+ */
+export function generateRiskReport(scenarios: TestScenario[]): string {
+  const priorityCounts = scenarios.reduce(
+    (acc, s) => {
+      acc[s.priority] = (acc[s.priority] || 0) + 1;
+      return acc;
+    },
+    {} as Record<string, number>,
+  );
+
+  const actionCounts = scenarios.reduce(
+    (acc, s) => {
+      acc[s.risk.action] = (acc[s.risk.action] || 0) + 1;
+      return acc;
+    },
+    {} as Record<string, number>,
+  );
+
+  return `
+# Risk Assessment Report
+
+## Risk Matrix
+${generateRiskMatrix()}
+
+## Priority Distribution
+- **P0 (Critical)**: ${priorityCounts.P0 || 0} scenarios
+- **P1 (High)**: ${priorityCounts.P1 || 0} scenarios
+- **P2 (Medium)**: ${priorityCounts.P2 || 0} scenarios
+- **P3 (Low)**: ${priorityCounts.P3 || 0} scenarios
+
+## Action Required
+- **BLOCK**: ${actionCounts.BLOCK || 0} scenarios (auto-fail gate)
+- **MITIGATE**: ${actionCounts.MITIGATE || 0} scenarios (concerns at gate)
+- **MONITOR**: ${actionCounts.MONITOR || 0} scenarios (watch closely)
+- **DOCUMENT**: ${actionCounts.DOCUMENT || 0} scenarios (awareness only)
+
+## Scenarios by Risk Score (Highest First)
+${scenarios
+  .sort((a, b) => b.risk.score - a.risk.score)
+  .map((s) => `- **[${s.priority}]** ${s.id}: ${s.title} (Score: ${s.risk.score} - ${s.risk.action})`)
+  .join('\n')}
+`.trim();
+}
+```
+
+**Key Points**:
+
+- Risk score → remediation action mapping (DOCUMENT/MONITOR/MITIGATE/BLOCK, automated); priority
+  is assigned separately via the test-priorities-matrix.md decision tree
+- Report generation with priority/action distribution
+- Scenarios sorted by risk score (highest first)
+- Visual matrix included in reports
+- Reusable across projects (extract to shared library)
+
+---
+
+### Example 3: Dynamic Risk Re-Assessment (Continuous Evaluation)
+
+**Context**: Recalculate risk scores as project evolves (requirements change, mitigations implemented)
+
+**Implementation**:
+
+```typescript
+// src/testing/risk-tracking.ts
+import { type RiskAssessment, assessRisk, type Probability, type Impact } from './risk-matrix';
+
+export type RiskHistory = {
+  timestamp: Date;
+  assessment: RiskAssessment;
+  changedBy: string;
+  reason: string;
+};
+
+export type TrackedRisk = {
+  id: string;
+  title: string;
+  feature: string;
+  currentRisk: RiskAssessment;
+  history: RiskHistory[];
+  mitigations: string[];
+  status: 'OPEN' | 'MITIGATED' | 'WAIVED' | 'RESOLVED';
+};
+
+export class RiskTracker {
+  private risks: Map<string, TrackedRisk> = new Map();
+
+  /**
+   * Add new risk to tracker
+   */
+  addRisk(params: {
+    id: string;
+    title: string;
+    feature: string;
+    probability: Probability;
+    impact: Impact;
+    reasoning: string;
+    changedBy: string;
+  }): TrackedRisk {
+    const { id, title, feature, probability, impact, reasoning, changedBy } = params;
+
+    const assessment = assessRisk({ probability, impact, reasoning });
+
+    const risk: TrackedRisk = {
+      id,
+      title,
+      feature,
+      currentRisk: assessment,
+      history: [
+        {
+          timestamp: new Date(),
+          assessment,
+          changedBy,
+          reason: 'Initial assessment',
+        },
+      ],
+      mitigations: [],
+      status: 'OPEN',
+    };
+
+    this.risks.set(id, risk);
+    return risk;
+  }
+
+  /**
+   * Reassess risk (probability or impact changed)
+   */
+  reassessRisk(params: {
+    id: string;
+    probability?: Probability;
+    impact?: Impact;
+    reasoning: string;
+    changedBy: string;
+  }): TrackedRisk | null {
+    const { id, probability, impact, reasoning, changedBy } = params;
+    const risk = this.risks.get(id);
+    if (!risk) return null;
+
+    // Use existing values if not provided
+    const newProbability = probability ?? risk.currentRisk.probability;
+    const newImpact = impact ?? risk.currentRisk.impact;
+
+    const newAssessment = assessRisk({
+      probability: newProbability,
+      impact: newImpact,
+      reasoning,
+    });
+
+    risk.currentRisk = newAssessment;
+    risk.history.push({
+      timestamp: new Date(),
+      assessment: newAssessment,
+      changedBy,
+      reason: reasoning,
+    });
+
+    this.risks.set(id, risk);
+    return risk;
+  }
+
+  /**
+   * Mark risk as mitigated (probability reduced)
+   */
+  mitigateRisk(params: { id: string; newProbability: Probability; mitigation: string; changedBy: string }): TrackedRisk | null {
+    const { id, newProbability, mitigation, changedBy } = params;
+    const risk = this.reassessRisk({
+      id,
+      probability: newProbability,
+      reasoning: `Mitigation implemented: ${mitigation}`,
+      changedBy,
+    });
+
+    if (risk) {
+      risk.mitigations.push(mitigation);
+      if (risk.currentRisk.action === 'DOCUMENT' || risk.currentRisk.action === 'MONITOR') {
+        risk.status = 'MITIGATED';
+      }
+    }
+
+    return risk;
+  }
+
+  /**
+   * Get risks requiring action (MITIGATE or BLOCK)
+   */
+  getRisksRequiringAction(): TrackedRisk[] {
+    return Array.from(this.risks.values()).filter(
+      (r) => r.status === 'OPEN' && (r.currentRisk.action === 'MITIGATE' || r.currentRisk.action === 'BLOCK'),
+    );
+  }
+
+  /**
+   * Generate risk trend report (show changes over time)
+   */
+  generateTrendReport(riskId: string): string | null {
+    const risk = this.risks.get(riskId);
+    if (!risk) return null;
+
+    return `
+# Risk Trend Report: ${risk.id}
+
+**Title**: ${risk.title}
+**Feature**: ${risk.feature}
+**Status**: ${risk.status}
+
+## Current Assessment
+- **Probability**: ${risk.currentRisk.probability}
+- **Impact**: ${risk.currentRisk.impact}
+- **Score**: ${risk.currentRisk.score}
+- **Action**: ${risk.currentRisk.action}
+- **Reasoning**: ${risk.currentRisk.reasoning}
+
+## Mitigations Applied
+${risk.mitigations.length > 0 ? risk.mitigations.map((m) => `- ${m}`).join('\n') : '- None'}
+
+## History (${risk.history.length} changes)
+${risk.history
+  .reverse()
+  .map((h) => `- **${h.timestamp.toISOString()}** by ${h.changedBy}: Score ${h.assessment.score} (${h.assessment.action}) - ${h.reason}`)
+  .join('\n')}
+`.trim();
+  }
+}
+```
+
+**Key Points**:
+
+- Historical tracking (audit trail for risk changes)
+- Mitigation impact tracking (probability reduction)
+- Status lifecycle (OPEN → MITIGATED → RESOLVED)
+- Trend reports (show risk evolution over time)
+- Re-assessment triggers (requirements change, new info)
+
+---
+
+### Example 4: Risk Matrix in Gate Decision (Integration with Trace Workflow)
+
+**Context**: Use probability-impact scores to drive gate decisions (PASS/CONCERNS/FAIL/WAIVED)
+
+**Implementation**:
+
+```typescript
+// src/testing/gate-decision.ts
+import { type RiskScore, classifyRiskAction, type RiskAction } from './risk-matrix';
+import { type TrackedRisk } from './risk-tracking';
+
+export type GateDecision = 'PASS' | 'CONCERNS' | 'FAIL' | 'WAIVED';
+
+export type GateResult = {
+  decision: GateDecision;
+  blockers: TrackedRisk[]; // Score=9, action=BLOCK
+  concerns: TrackedRisk[]; // Score 6-8, action=MITIGATE
+  monitored: TrackedRisk[]; // Score 4-5, action=MONITOR
+  documented: TrackedRisk[]; // Score 1-3, action=DOCUMENT
+  summary: string;
+};
+
+/**
+ * Evaluate gate based on risk assessments
+ */
+export function evaluateGateFromRisks(risks: TrackedRisk[]): GateResult {
+  const blockers = risks.filter((r) => r.currentRisk.action === 'BLOCK' && r.status === 'OPEN');
+  const concerns = risks.filter((r) => r.currentRisk.action === 'MITIGATE' && r.status === 'OPEN');
+  const monitored = risks.filter((r) => r.currentRisk.action === 'MONITOR');
+  const documented = risks.filter((r) => r.currentRisk.action === 'DOCUMENT');
+
+  let decision: GateDecision;
+
+  if (blockers.length > 0) {
+    decision = 'FAIL';
+  } else if (concerns.length > 0) {
+    decision = 'CONCERNS';
+  } else {
+    decision = 'PASS';
+  }
+
+  const summary = generateGateSummary({ decision, blockers, concerns, monitored, documented });
+
+  return { decision, blockers, concerns, monitored, documented, summary };
+}
+
+/**
+ * Generate gate decision summary
+ */
+function generateGateSummary(result: Omit<GateResult, 'summary'>): string {
+  const { decision, blockers, concerns, monitored, documented } = result;
+
+  const lines: string[] = [`## Gate Decision: ${decision}`];
+
+  if (decision === 'FAIL') {
+    lines.push(`\n**Blockers** (${blockers.length}): Automatic FAIL until resolved or waived`);
+    blockers.forEach((r) => {
+      lines.push(`- **${r.id}**: ${r.title} (Score: ${r.currentRisk.score})`);
+      lines.push(`  - Probability: ${r.currentRisk.probability}, Impact: ${r.currentRisk.impact}`);
+      lines.push(`  - Reasoning: ${r.currentRisk.reasoning}`);
+    });
+  }
+
+  if (concerns.length > 0) {
+    lines.push(`\n**Concerns** (${concerns.length}): Address before release`);
+    concerns.forEach((r) => {
+      lines.push(`- **${r.id}**: ${r.title} (Score: ${r.currentRisk.score})`);
+      lines.push(`  - Mitigations: ${r.mitigations.join(', ') || 'None'}`);
+    });
+  }
+
+  if (monitored.length > 0) {
+    lines.push(`\n**Monitored** (${monitored.length}): Watch closely`);
+    monitored.forEach((r) => lines.push(`- **${r.id}**: ${r.title} (Score: ${r.currentRisk.score})`));
+  }
+
+  if (documented.length > 0) {
+    lines.push(`\n**Documented** (${documented.length}): Awareness only`);
+  }
+
+  lines.push(`\n---\n`);
+  lines.push(`**Next Steps**:`);
+  if (decision === 'FAIL') {
+    lines.push(`- Resolve blockers or request formal waiver`);
+  } else if (decision === 'CONCERNS') {
+    lines.push(`- Implement mitigations for high-risk scenarios (score 6-8)`);
+    lines.push(`- Re-run gate after mitigations`);
+  } else {
+    lines.push(`- Proceed with release`);
+  }
+
+  return lines.join('\n');
+}
+```
+
+**Key Points**:
+
+- Gate decision driven by risk scores (not gut feeling)
+- Automatic FAIL for score=9 (blockers)
+- CONCERNS for score 6-8 (requires mitigation)
+- PASS only when no blockers/concerns
+- Actionable summary with next steps
+- Integration with trace workflow (Phase 2)
+
+---
+
+## Probability-Impact Threshold Summary
+
+| Score | Action   | Gate Impact          | Typical Use Case                       |
+| ----- | -------- | -------------------- | -------------------------------------- |
+| 1-3   | DOCUMENT | None                 | Cosmetic issues, low-priority bugs     |
+| 4-5   | MONITOR  | None (watch closely) | Edge cases, partial unknowns           |
+| 6-8   | MITIGATE | CONCERNS at gate     | High-impact scenarios needing coverage |
+| 9     | BLOCK    | Automatic FAIL       | Critical blockers, must resolve        |
+
+## Risk Assessment Checklist
+
+Before deploying risk matrix:
+
+- [ ] **Probability scale defined**: 1 (unlikely), 2 (possible), 3 (likely) with clear examples
+- [ ] **Impact scale defined**: 1 (minor), 2 (degraded), 3 (critical) with concrete criteria
+- [ ] **Threshold rules documented**: Score → Action mapping (1-3 = DOCUMENT, 4-5 = MONITOR, 6-8 = MITIGATE, 9 = BLOCK)
+- [ ] **Gate integration**: Risk scores drive gate decisions (PASS/CONCERNS/FAIL/WAIVED)
+- [ ] **Re-assessment process**: Risks re-evaluated as project evolves (requirements change, mitigations applied)
+- [ ] **Audit trail**: Historical tracking for risk changes (who, when, why)
+- [ ] **Mitigation tracking**: Link mitigations to probability reduction (quantify impact)
+- [ ] **Reporting**: Risk matrix visualization, trend reports, gate summaries
+
+## Integration Points
+
+- **Used in workflows**: `*test-design` (initial risk assessment), `*trace` (gate decision Phase 2), `*nfr-assess` (security/performance risks)
+- **Related fragments**: `risk-governance.md` (risk scoring matrix, gate decision engine), `test-priorities-matrix.md` (P0-P3 mapping), `nfr-criteria.md` (impact assessment for NFRs)
+- **Tools**: TypeScript for type safety, markdown for reports, version control for audit trail
+
+_Source: Murat risk model summary, gate decision patterns from production systems, probability-impact matrix from risk governance practices_