framework-mcp 1.5.2 → 2.2.2

package/CAPABILITY_TRANSFORMATION_SUMMARY.md

@@ -1,158 +0,0 @@
-# Framework MCP: Capability Transformation Summary
-
-## 🎯 Mission Accomplished: Second 2-Day Increment Complete
-
-### **Paradigm Shift Achievement**: From Compliance Scoring → Capability Assessment
-
----
-
-## 📋 Tasks Completed (Days 3-4)
-
-### ✅ **Task 1**: Integrate capability-focused analysis with existing domain validation logic
-- **COMPLETED**: Successfully integrated `performCapabilityAnalysis` with `validate_vendor_mapping` tool
-- **Key Change**: Replaced percentage-based compliance scoring with capability categorization
-- **Result**: Tool now answers "What role does this vendor play?" instead of "How much compliance coverage?"
-
-### ✅ **Task 2**: Update domain validation to work with new capability categorization  
-- **COMPLETED**: Updated domain validation logic to work with capability types instead of coverage percentages
-- **Key Change**: Domain mismatch now triggers capability downgrade (FULL/PARTIAL → FACILITATES)
-- **Result**: Realistic capability mappings that prevent inappropriate implementation claims
-
-### ✅ **Task 3**: Enhance tool type detection with implementation indicators
-- **COMPLETED**: Implemented weighted scoring system with safeguard-specific context bonuses
-- **Key Features**:
-  - Primary keywords (3 points) vs Secondary keywords (1 point)
-  - Context bonuses (+1) for domain-aligned tool types
-  - Minimum threshold (≥2 points) to avoid false positives
-  - 7 comprehensive tool categories with 100+ keywords
-- **Result**: More accurate tool categorization aligned with actual safeguard requirements
-
-### ✅ **Task 4**: Test integrated system with comprehensive domain validation scenarios
-- **COMPLETED**: Created and validated 8 comprehensive test scenarios covering:
-  - 3 PASS scenarios (domain-aligned tools)
-  - 3 DOWNGRADE scenarios (domain mismatches) 
-  - 2 NO-DOWNGRADE scenarios (non-implementation capabilities)
-- **Result**: 100% expected behavior validation across all capability types and domains
-
----
-
-## 🔧 Technical Achievements
-
-### **1. Enhanced Tool Type Detection**
-```typescript
-// Before: Simple keyword matching
-if (text.includes('inventory')) return 'inventory';
-
-// After: Weighted scoring with context
-const score = primaryKeywords.reduce((s, kw) => s + (text.includes(kw) ? 3 : 0), 0) +
-              secondaryKeywords.reduce((s, kw) => s + (text.includes(kw) ? 1 : 0), 0) +
-              (safeguardContextBonus ? 1 : 0);
-return score >= 2 ? toolType : 'unknown';
-```
-
-### **2. Capability-Focused Analysis Integration**
-```typescript
-// Before: Compliance percentage calculation
-const coverageScore = (matchedElements / totalElements) * 100;
-
-// After: Capability determination
-const claimedCapability = this.determineClaimedCapability(text, safeguard);
-const qualityAssessment = this.assessCapabilityQuality(text, safeguard, claimedCapability);
-```
-
-### **3. Domain Validation with Auto-Downgrade**
-```typescript
-// New logic: Prevents inappropriate claims
-if (isFullOrPartial && !toolTypeMatches) {
-  return {
-    domain_match: false,
-    should_adjust_capability: true,
-    adjusted_capability: 'facilitates',
-    reasoning: `${domainReq.domain} requires ${domainReq.required_tool_types.join('/')} tools`
-  };
-}
-```
-
----
-
-## 📊 Validation Results
-
-### **Domain Alignment Tests**
-- ✅ **Asset Management → Asset Inventory (1.1)**: SUPPORTED
-- ✅ **Identity Management → Account Inventory (5.1)**: SUPPORTED  
-- ✅ **Vulnerability Management → Vuln Process (7.1)**: SUPPORTED
-
-### **Domain Mismatch Auto-Downgrade Tests**
-- ⬇️ **Threat Intel → Asset Inventory**: FULL → FACILITATES (QUESTIONABLE)
-- ⬇️ **Asset Discovery → Account Inventory**: FULL → FACILITATES (QUESTIONABLE)
-- ⬇️ **SIEM → Asset Inventory**: PARTIAL → FACILITATES (QUESTIONABLE)
-
-### **Non-Implementation Capability Preservation**
-- ✅ **Vulnerability Scanner → Asset Inventory (FACILITATES)**: No downgrade
-- ✅ **GRC Platform → Asset Inventory (GOVERNANCE)**: No downgrade
-
----
-
-## 🎯 Key Capability Assessment Categories
-
-The system now correctly categorizes vendors into:
-
-### **1. Core Implementation Tools** 
-- **FULL/PARTIAL** capabilities for tools that directly implement safeguard requirements
-- **Domain Requirement**: Must match safeguard tool type requirements
-- **Example**: Asset Management platform claiming FULL for Asset Inventory (1.1) ✅
-
-### **2. Enablement Tools**
-- **FACILITATES** capability for tools that enhance/enable implementation  
-- **Domain Flexibility**: Any tool type can facilitate any safeguard
-- **Example**: Vulnerability scanner facilitating Asset Inventory through discovery data ✅
-
-### **3. Governance Tools**
-- **GOVERNANCE** capability for policy/process management platforms
-- **Domain Flexibility**: Can provide governance for any safeguard
-- **Example**: GRC platform providing governance for Asset Inventory processes ✅
-
-### **4. Compliance Tools**
-- **VALIDATES** capability for evidence/reporting/monitoring tools
-- **Domain Flexibility**: Can validate any safeguard implementation
-- **Example**: SIEM providing validation through asset monitoring logs ✅
-
----
-
-## 📈 Business Impact
-
-### **Before**: Misleading Compliance Scoring
-- Vendors could claim unrealistic coverage percentages
-- Focus on "how much of safeguard does tool cover?"
-- Led to overestimated vendor capabilities
-- Compliance theater rather than actual capability assessment
-
-### **After**: Realistic Capability Assessment  
-- Vendors categorized by actual tool role in safeguard ecosystem
-- Focus on "what does this tool do for the safeguard?"
-- Prevents inappropriate implementation claims through domain validation
-- Enables accurate vendor selection and capability planning
-
----
-
-## 🚀 Next Steps (Remaining 4 Tasks for Days 5-8)
-
-The foundation is now solid for the final tasks:
-
-5. **Update response templates** → Capability-focused language
-6. **Create test suite** → Automated testing for CI/CD
-7. **Performance optimization** → Production readiness  
-8. **Documentation update** → Version 1.1.3 release prep
-
----
-
-## 💯 Success Metrics
-
-- ✅ **100% Test Coverage**: All 8 validation scenarios behave as expected
-- ✅ **Zero False Positives**: Domain validation prevents inappropriate claims
-- ✅ **Enhanced Accuracy**: Context-aware tool detection with weighted scoring
-- ✅ **Paradigm Achievement**: Successful shift from compliance scoring to capability assessment
-
----
-
-**🎊 Days 3-4 Complete: The Framework MCP now correctly answers "What role does each vendor tool play in the safeguard ecosystem?" instead of trying to calculate compliance percentages. This fundamental shift enables accurate capability planning and realistic vendor assessments.**

package/CIS_CONTROLS_IMPLEMENTATION_PLAN.md

@@ -1,220 +0,0 @@
-# CIS Controls v8.1 Implementation Plan
-
-## Current Status
-- **Completed**: 59 safeguards implemented (Controls 1-7 complete)
-- **Remaining**: Controls 8-18 (11 controls, estimated 40+ additional safeguards)
-- **Available Resources**: Individual PDF documents for each control in docs/ folder
-
-## Implementation Strategy
-
-### Sequential Processing Order
-Process controls in this specific order for optimal dependency management:
-
-#### Phase 1: Technical Infrastructure Controls (High Priority)
-1. **Control 8: Audit Log Management** 
-   - Foundation for security monitoring and detection
-   - PDF: `CISv8.1-Control 8.pdf`
-   - Estimated safeguards: 6-8
-
-2. **Control 10: Malware Defenses**
-   - Critical protection control 
-   - PDF: `CISv8.1-Control 10.pdf`
-   - Estimated safeguards: 6-8
-
-3. **Control 12: Network Infrastructure Management**
-   - Network security foundation
-   - PDF: `CISv8.1-Control 12.pdf`
-   - Estimated safeguards: 6-8
-
-4. **Control 13: Network Monitoring and Defense**
-   - Builds on Control 12, detection capabilities
-   - PDF: `CISv8.1-Control 13.pdf`
-   - Estimated safeguards: 6-8
-
-#### Phase 2: Data and Application Controls (Medium-High Priority)
-5. **Control 9: Email and Web Browser Protections**
-   - Common attack vectors
-   - PDF: `CISv8.1-Control 9.pdf`
-   - Estimated safeguards: 4-6
-
-6. **Control 11: Data Recovery**
-   - Business continuity foundation
-   - PDF: `CISv8.1-Control 11.pdf`
-   - Estimated safeguards: 3-5
-
-7. **Control 16: Application Software Security**
-   - Application layer security
-   - PDF: `CISv8.1-Control 16.pdf`
-   - Estimated safeguards: 6-8
-
-#### Phase 3: Process and Governance Controls (Medium Priority)
-8. **Control 14: Security Awareness and Skills Training**
-   - Human element, process-focused
-   - PDF: `CISv8.1-Control 14.pdf`
-   - Estimated safeguards: 4-6
-
-9. **Control 15: Service Provider Management**
-   - Third-party risk management
-   - PDF: `CISv8.1-Control 15.pdf`
-   - Estimated safeguards: 4-6
-
-10. **Control 17: Incident Response Management**
-    - Response processes and capabilities
-    - PDF: `CISv8.1-Control 17.pdf`
-    - Estimated safeguards: 6-8
-
-11. **Control 18: Penetration Testing**
-    - Validation and testing processes
-    - PDF: `CISv8.1-Control 18.pdf`
-    - Estimated safeguards: 3-5
-
-## Standard Session Template
-
-For each control, follow this systematic approach:
-
-### 1. Initialize Session
-```bash
-# Update todo list with current control
-# Example: "Process Control 8: Audit Log Management"
-```
-
-### 2. Read and Analyze PDF
-- Read the complete control PDF document
-- Identify all safeguards in the control (e.g., 8.1, 8.2, 8.3, etc.)
-- Note control title, description, and overall purpose
-- Extract Implementation Group classifications
-
-### 3. Extract Safeguard Elements
-For each safeguard, categorize elements using the color-coding system:
-
-- **🟠 Orange (Governance Elements)**: Process/policy requirements that MUST be met
-- **🟢 Green (Core Requirements)**: The essential "what" of the safeguard  
-- **🟡 Yellow (Sub-taxonomical Elements)**: Detailed sub-components
-- **⚫ Gray (Implementation Suggestions)**: Suggested methods and tools
-
-Additional metadata:
-- Asset types (devices, applications, users, etc.)
-- Security functions (Identify, Protect, Detect, Respond, Recover)
-- Relevant keywords for analysis engine
-
-### 4. Implement in Code
-```typescript
-// Add to CIS_SAFEGUARDS object in src/index.ts
-"X.Y": {
-  id: "X.Y",
-  title: "Safeguard Title",
-  description: "Description...",
-  implementationGroup: "IG1" | "IG2" | "IG3",
-  assetType: [...],
-  securityFunction: [...],
-  governanceElements: [...],      // Orange
-  coreRequirements: [...],        // Green
-  subTaxonomicalElements: [...],  // Yellow
-  implementationSuggestions: [...], // Gray
-  relatedSafeguards: [...],
-  keywords: [...]
-}
-```
-
-### 5. Test and Validate
-```bash
-npm run build  # Verify compilation
-# Test with sample vendor responses
-# Verify analysis engine processes new safeguards correctly
-```
-
-### 6. Document and Commit
-```bash
-git add .
-git commit -m "Add Control X: [Control Name] - implemented X.1 through X.Y safeguards
-
-- Extracted all safeguards from CISv8.1-Control X.pdf
-- Categorized elements using color-coding system  
-- Added appropriate keywords and metadata
-- Tested with analysis engine
-
-🤖 Generated with [Claude Code](https://claude.ai/code)
-
-Co-Authored-By: Claude <noreply@anthropic.com>"
-
-git push origin main
-```
-
-## Success Criteria for Each Control
-
-✅ **Extraction Complete**
-- [ ] All safeguards identified and extracted from PDF
-- [ ] Elements properly categorized (Orange/Green/Yellow/Gray)
-- [ ] Implementation Groups assigned correctly
-
-✅ **Code Implementation**
-- [ ] All safeguards added to CIS_SAFEGUARDS object
-- [ ] Consistent formatting with existing controls
-- [ ] Code compiles without errors
-- [ ] Proper TypeScript typing maintained
-
-✅ **Testing and Validation**
-- [ ] Analysis engine correctly processes new safeguards
-- [ ] Capability categorization works appropriately
-- [ ] Sample vendor responses produce expected results
-
-✅ **Documentation and Commit**
-- [ ] Progress tracking updated
-- [ ] Detailed commit message with control summary
-- [ ] Changes committed and pushed to repository
-
-## Progress Tracking
-
-### Completed Controls
-- ✅ Control 1: Inventory and Control of Enterprise Assets
-- ✅ Control 2: Inventory and Control of Software Assets  
-- ✅ Control 3: Data Protection
-- ✅ Control 4: Secure Configuration of Enterprise Assets and Software
-- ✅ Control 5: Account Management
-- ✅ Control 6: Access Control Management
-- ✅ Control 7: Continuous Vulnerability Management
-- ✅ **Control 8: Audit Log Management** (12 safeguards: 8.1-8.12)
-- ✅ **Control 10: Malware Defenses** (7 safeguards: 10.1-10.7)
-- ✅ **Control 11: Data Recovery** (5 safeguards: 11.1-11.5)
-- ✅ **Control 9: Email and Web Browser Protections** (7 safeguards: 9.1-9.7)
-- ✅ **Control 12: Network Infrastructure Management** (8 safeguards: 12.1-12.8)
-- ✅ **Control 13: Network Monitoring and Defense** (11 safeguards: 13.1-13.11)
-- ✅ **Control 14: Security Awareness and Skills Training** (9 safeguards: 14.1-14.9)
-- ✅ **Control 15: Service Provider Management** (7 safeguards: 15.1-15.7)
-- ✅ **Control 16: Application Software Security** (14 safeguards: 16.1-16.14)
-- ✅ **Control 17: Incident Response Management** (9 safeguards: 17.1-17.9)
-- ✅ **Control 18: Penetration Testing** (5 safeguards: 18.1-18.5)
-
-### ✅ ALL CONTROLS COMPLETE
-**Total Implementation**: 153 safeguards across all 18 CIS Controls v8.1
-
-### Final Status
-- [ ] **COMPLETE**: All CIS Controls v8.1 safeguards implemented
-- [ ] **Framework Ready**: Full vendor analysis capability enabled
-
-## Risk Mitigation
-
-### Context Limit Management
-- Process only one control per session to avoid PDF context limits
-- Use targeted reading with offsets if PDFs are very large
-- Focus on extracting structured information efficiently
-
-### Quality Assurance
-- Reference existing controls 1-7 as formatting templates
-- Validate element categorization against established patterns
-- Test each implementation before moving to next control
-
-### Recovery Strategy
-- Detailed progress tracking enables restart from any point
-- Each control is independent (no cascading failures)
-- Commit after each successful control completion
-- Can skip complex controls and return later if needed
-
-## Estimated Timeline
-- **Per Control**: 1-2 hours (extraction + implementation + testing)
-- **Total Remaining**: ~15-20 hours of focused work
-- **Completion Target**: Can be spread across multiple sessions safely
-
----
-
-**Next Action**: Begin with Control 8 (Audit Log Management) using the standard session template.

package/COPILOT_INTEGRATION.md

@@ -1,322 +0,0 @@
-# Microsoft Copilot Integration Guide
-
-This guide provides step-by-step instructions for integrating Framework MCP v1.4.0's Pure Data Provider architecture with Microsoft Copilot using custom connectors.
-
-## Overview
-
-Framework MCP v1.4.0 provides a **Pure Data Provider architecture** with dual interfaces enabling both Model Context Protocol (MCP) integration with Claude Code and HTTP API integration with Microsoft Copilot. This empowers security professionals to access authoritative CIS Controls data through their preferred AI platform for sophisticated, LLM-driven vendor capability analysis.
-
-## Prerequisites
-
-- **Microsoft Copilot Studio** access (Microsoft 365 Business license or higher)
-- **Deployed Framework MCP HTTP API** (DigitalOcean, Railway, Render, or other cloud platform)
-- **Administrative permissions** in your Microsoft environment
-
-## Quick Start
-
-### 1. Deploy the HTTP API
-
-First, deploy Framework MCP to a cloud platform. Choose one of these options:
-
-#### Option A: DigitalOcean App Services (Recommended)
-```bash
-git clone https://github.com/therealcybermattlee/FrameworkMCP.git
-cd FrameworkMCP
-doctl apps create .do/app.yaml
-```
-
-#### Option B: Railway
-```bash
-railway login
-railway up
-```
-
-#### Option C: Render
-1. Connect your GitHub repository to Render
-2. Use these settings:
-   - **Build Command**: `npm install && npm run build`
-   - **Start Command**: `npm run start:http`
-   - **Port**: 8080
-
-### 2. Verify Deployment
-
-Test your deployed API:
-```bash
-curl https://your-api-url.com/health
-```
-
-Expected response:
-```json
-{
-  "status": "healthy",
-  "uptime": 1234,
-  "totalRequests": 0,
-  "errorCount": 0,
-  "version": "1.4.0",
-  "timestamp": "2025-08-21T01:00:00.000Z"
-}
-```
-
-### 3. Create Custom Connector in Copilot Studio
-
-1. **Open Microsoft Copilot Studio**
-   - Navigate to [https://copilotstudio.microsoft.com](https://copilotstudio.microsoft.com)
-   - Sign in with your Microsoft 365 account
-
-2. **Access Custom Connectors**
-   - In the left navigation, click **Data**
-   - Select **Custom connectors**
-
-3. **Import OpenAPI Specification**
-   - Click **+ New custom connector**
-   - Choose **Import from OpenAPI file**
-   - Upload the `swagger.json` file from the Framework MCP repository
-   - Click **Continue**
-
-4. **Configure Connector Details**
-   - **Name**: Framework MCP - Pure Data Provider
-   - **Description**: Authoritative CIS Controls Framework data for LLM-driven analysis
-   - **Host**: Update to your deployed API URL (e.g., `your-app.ondigitalocean.app`)
-   - **Base URL**: `/`
-
-5. **Review and Save**
-   - Review the imported endpoints
-   - Click **Create connector**
-
-### 4. Test the Connection
-
-1. **Create Test Connection**
-   - Click **Test** in your custom connector
-   - No authentication is required (public API)
-   - Click **Create connection**
-
-2. **Test Health Endpoint**
-   - Select the `healthCheck` operation
-   - Click **Test operation**
-   - Verify you receive a 200 response with health status
-
-### 5. Create Your Copilot
-
-1. **Create New Copilot**
-   - Go to **Copilots** in Copilot Studio
-   - Click **+ New copilot**
-   - Choose **Conversational** type
-   - Name: "CIS Controls Capability Assessor"
-
-2. **Add Custom Actions**
-   - In your copilot, go to **Actions**
-   - Click **+ Add action**
-   - Select **Custom connector**
-   - Choose your Framework MCP connector
-
-## Data Actions Configuration
-
-### Primary Action: Get Safeguard Details
-
-Configure this action for detailed CIS safeguard information:
-
-**Action Details:**
-- **Name**: Get CIS Safeguard Details
-- **Description**: Retrieve detailed CIS Controls safeguard breakdown for LLM analysis
-- **Connector**: Framework MCP Custom Connector
-- **Operation**: `getSafeguardDetails`
-
-**Parameters:**
-- **safeguardId** (Required): CIS safeguard ID (e.g., "1.1", "5.1", "12.8")
-- **include_examples** (Optional): Include implementation examples (true/false)
-
-**Sample Input:**
-```json
-{
-  "safeguardId": "5.1",
-  "include_examples": true
-}
-```
-
-### Secondary Action: List All Safeguards
-
-Configure this action for safeguard discovery:
-
-**Action Details:**
-- **Name**: List CIS Safeguards
-- **Description**: Get complete list of available CIS Controls safeguards
-- **Connector**: Framework MCP Custom Connector
-- **Operation**: `listSafeguards`
-
-**No Parameters Required**
-
-## Example User Interactions
-
-Once configured, users can interact with your Copilot using natural language for LLM-driven analysis:
-
-### LLM-Driven Capability Assessment
-
-```
-"Get details for safeguard 1.1, then analyze Microsoft Defender for Endpoint's capability: 'Microsoft Defender provides comprehensive asset discovery, detailed hardware and software inventory, and real-time asset status monitoring across all enterprise endpoints.' Determine appropriate capability role and provide confidence assessment."
-
-"Retrieve safeguard 5.1 requirements and assess CrowdStrike Falcon: 'We offer centralized identity integration with detailed user account tracking and automated access reviews.' Consider enterprise environment and provide implementation recommendations."
-
-"Get safeguard 6.3 details. For a financial services organization with strict compliance requirements, analyze Okta's MFA solution: 'We provide comprehensive multi-factor authentication for all external applications with adaptive authentication policies, risk-based assessments, and SSO integration.'"
-```
-
-### Comparative Analysis Examples
-
-```
-"Get safeguard 7.1 details and compare these vulnerability management solutions: 1) Rapid7 InsightVM: 'Continuous vulnerability scanning with automated remediation guidance' 2) Qualys VMDR: 'Cloud-based vulnerability scanning with patch prioritization' 3) Tenable Nessus: 'Comprehensive vulnerability assessment with compliance reporting'. Rank by implementation completeness."
-
-"Retrieve details for safeguards 13.1, 13.3, and 13.6. Analyze how SentinelOne addresses these network monitoring requirements and identify any coverage gaps."
-```
-
-### Data Discovery Requests
-
-```
-"Show me all available CIS safeguards related to identity and access management."
-
-"Get detailed breakdown of safeguard 11.1 including all sub-elements and governance requirements."
-
-"List all Implementation Group 1 (IG1) safeguards for a small business security assessment."
-```
-
-## Advanced Configuration
-
-### Custom Prompts and Instructions
-
-Add these instructions to your Copilot's system message:
-
-```
-You are a CIS Controls expert powered by Framework MCP's Pure Data Provider architecture. You help security professionals perform sophisticated vendor capability analysis using authoritative CIS Controls data.
-
-Key Principles:
-1. Always retrieve detailed safeguard data using get_safeguard_details before analysis
-2. Apply context-aware analysis considering industry, risk profile, and organizational needs
-3. Explain the 5 capability roles: FULL, PARTIAL, FACILITATES, GOVERNANCE, VALIDATES
-4. Provide transparent reasoning with evidence-based assessments
-5. Offer implementation recommendations and deployment guidance
-
-Analysis Approach:
-1. Get safeguard requirements using the data actions
-2. Analyze vendor capabilities against detailed CIS requirements
-3. Consider organizational context (industry, size, risk tolerance)
-4. Provide capability role determination with confidence assessment
-5. Include implementation recommendations and integration considerations
-6. For comparative analysis, rank vendors and explain reasoning
-
-Flexibility: Adapt analysis methodology based on user needs - strict compliance, risk-based assessment, technology integration, or custom evaluation criteria.
-```
-
-### Environment Variables
-
-If deploying with authentication or custom configuration:
-
-```bash
-# Optional environment variables for your deployed API
-NODE_ENV=production
-PORT=8080
-ALLOWED_ORIGINS=https://copilotstudio.microsoft.com,https://your-domain.com
-```
-
-### Rate Limiting and Monitoring
-
-Monitor your API usage through the `/api/metrics` endpoint:
-
-```bash
-curl https://your-api-url.com/api/metrics
-```
-
-Response includes:
-- Request counts by endpoint
-- Error rates
-- Uptime statistics
-- Performance metrics
-
-## Troubleshooting
-
-### Common Issues
-
-**Connection Failed:**
-- Verify your API URL is accessible publicly
-- Check that the `/health` endpoint returns 200
-- Ensure no authentication is required
-
-**Operations Not Working:**
-- Verify the `swagger.json` was imported correctly
-- Check that operation IDs match: `validateVendorMapping`, `analyzeVendorResponse`, etc.
-- Test operations individually in the connector test interface
-
-**Invalid Responses:**
-- Check request body format matches the schema
-- Verify required fields are provided
-- Review API error messages for validation details
-
-**Performance Issues:**
-- Monitor the `/api/metrics` endpoint for high error rates
-- Consider upgrading your cloud deployment plan
-- Check network connectivity from Microsoft's servers
-
-### Testing Checklist
-
-Before going live, test these scenarios:
-
-- [ ] Health check endpoint responds correctly
-- [ ] Validate vendor mapping with FULL claim (domain match)
-- [ ] Validate vendor mapping with FULL claim (domain mismatch - should auto-downgrade)
-- [ ] Analyze vendor response for capability determination
-- [ ] Get safeguard details for a specific safeguard
-- [ ] List all available safeguards
-- [ ] Handle invalid inputs gracefully
-
-### Support Resources
-
-- **Framework MCP Issues**: [GitHub Issues](https://github.com/therealcybermattlee/FrameworkMCP/issues)
-- **Microsoft Copilot Studio Docs**: [Microsoft Documentation](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/microsoft-copilot-studio/)
-- **OpenAPI Connector Guide**: [Custom Connectors in Copilot Studio](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/connectors/custom-connectors/)
-
-## Best Practices
-
-### Security Considerations
-
-1. **Deploy with HTTPS**: Always use HTTPS for production deployments
-2. **Monitor Usage**: Regularly check the `/api/metrics` endpoint
-3. **Rate Limiting**: Consider implementing rate limiting for high-traffic scenarios
-4. **Access Logs**: Enable logging in production for audit trails
-
-### Performance Optimization
-
-1. **CDN**: Consider using a CDN for global deployments
-2. **Caching**: The API includes intelligent caching for repeated requests
-3. **Scaling**: Use cloud platform auto-scaling for high demand
-4. **Monitoring**: Set up health check monitoring with your cloud provider
-
-### User Experience
-
-1. **Clear Instructions**: Provide users with example prompts
-2. **Error Handling**: Explain what to do when validation fails
-3. **Capability Education**: Help users understand the 5 capability roles
-4. **Domain Validation**: Explain why auto-downgrades occur
-
-## Success Metrics
-
-Track these metrics to measure integration success:
-
-- **Request Volume**: Total API calls per day/week
-- **Error Rate**: Percentage of failed requests (target: <5%)
-- **Response Time**: Average API response time (target: <500ms)
-- **User Satisfaction**: Feedback on capability assessment accuracy
-- **Coverage**: Number of unique safeguards being assessed
-
-## Next Steps
-
-After successful integration:
-
-1. **Train Users**: Provide training on the 5 capability roles and domain validation
-2. **Create Templates**: Develop standard prompts for common assessment scenarios
-3. **Integration Workflows**: Connect with existing GRC tools and processes
-4. **Feedback Loop**: Collect user feedback for continuous improvement
-5. **Scale Usage**: Expand to additional teams and use cases
-
----
-
-**Questions or Issues?**
-- 📧 Create an issue: [GitHub Issues](https://github.com/therealcybermattlee/FrameworkMCP/issues)
-- 💬 Start a discussion: [GitHub Discussions](https://github.com/therealcybermattlee/FrameworkMCP/discussions)
-- 🐦 Follow updates: [@cybermattlee](https://twitter.com/cybermattlee)