framework-mcp 1.4.0 → 1.5.1

package/src/interfaces/http/http-server.ts

@@ -168,7 +168,7 @@ export class FrameworkHttpServer {
 
   public start(): void {
     this.app.listen(this.port, '0.0.0.0', () => {
-      console.log(`🚀 Framework MCP HTTP Server v1.4.0 running on port ${this.port}`);
+      console.log(`🚀 Framework MCP HTTP Server v1.5.1 running on port ${this.port}`);
       console.log(`📊 Health check: http://localhost:${this.port}/health`);
       console.log(`📖 API docs: http://localhost:${this.port}/api`);
       console.log(`🔧 Environment: ${process.env.NODE_ENV || 'development'}`);

package/src/shared/types.ts

@@ -14,6 +14,13 @@ export interface SafeguardElement {
   implementationSuggestions: string[]; // Gray - Suggestions for implementation
   relatedSafeguards: string[];
   keywords: string[];
+  systemPrompt?: {
+    role: string;           // e.g., "asset_inventory_expert", "access_control_specialist"
+    context: string;        // Brief context about the safeguard for AI understanding
+    objective: string;      // What the AI should accomplish
+    guidelines: string[];   // Specific evaluation criteria and methods
+    outputFormat: string;   // Expected response structure for n8n processing
+  };
 }
 
 export interface VendorAnalysis {

package/swagger.json

@@ -2,8 +2,8 @@
   "openapi": "3.0.3",
   "info": {
     "title": "Framework MCP API - Pure Data Provider",
-    "description": "Microsoft Copilot-compatible API providing authoritative CIS Controls Framework v8.1 data (153 safeguards). Pure Data Provider architecture empowers LLMs with structured safeguards data for sophisticated, context-aware vendor capability analysis.",
-    "version": "1.4.0",
+    "description": "Microsoft Copilot-compatible API providing authoritative CIS Controls Framework v8.1 data (153 safeguards). Pure Data Provider architecture empowers LLMs with structured safeguards data and AI-driven systemPrompts for sophisticated, context-aware vendor capability analysis and n8n workflow automation.",
+    "version": "1.5.1",
     "contact": {
       "name": "Framework MCP Support",
       "url": "https://github.com/therealcybermattlee/FrameworkMCP"
@@ -67,7 +67,7 @@
     "/api/safeguards/{safeguardId}": {
       "get": {
         "summary": "Get Safeguard Details",
-        "description": "Get detailed information about a specific CIS safeguard including governance elements, core requirements, and implementation suggestions",
+        "description": "Get detailed information about a specific CIS safeguard including governance elements, core requirements, implementation suggestions, and AI-driven systemPrompt for n8n workflow integration",
         "operationId": "getSafeguardDetails",
         "tags": ["Safeguards"],
         "parameters": [
@@ -255,6 +255,41 @@
               "type": "string"
             },
             "description": "Implementation methods and suggestions (Gray elements)"
+          },
+          "systemPrompt": {
+            "type": "object",
+            "description": "AI-driven system prompt for n8n workflow automation and vendor analysis",
+            "properties": {
+              "role": {
+                "type": "string",
+                "description": "Expert role for the specific control type",
+                "example": "asset_inventory_expert"
+              },
+              "context": {
+                "type": "string",
+                "description": "Brief context about the safeguard for AI understanding",
+                "example": "You are evaluating enterprise asset inventory solutions against CIS Control 1.1 requirements"
+              },
+              "objective": {
+                "type": "string", 
+                "description": "What the AI should accomplish",
+                "example": "Determine if vendor solution provides complete asset inventory capabilities"
+              },
+              "guidelines": {
+                "type": "array",
+                "items": {
+                  "type": "string"
+                },
+                "description": "Specific evaluation criteria and methods",
+                "example": ["Verify coverage of all asset types", "Confirm data collection accuracy"]
+              },
+              "outputFormat": {
+                "type": "string",
+                "description": "Expected response structure for n8n processing",
+                "example": "Provide structured assessment with capability level (FULL/PARTIAL/FACILITATES/GOVERNANCE/VALIDATES), confidence score, and evidence summary"
+              }
+            },
+            "required": ["role", "context", "objective", "guidelines", "outputFormat"]
           }
         }
       },
@@ -279,7 +314,7 @@
           },
           "version": {
             "type": "string",
-            "example": "1.4.0"
+            "example": "1.5.1"
           },
           "timestamp": {
             "type": "string",
@@ -324,7 +359,7 @@
           },
           "version": {
             "type": "string",
-            "example": "1.4.0"
+            "example": "1.5.1"
           },
           "description": {
             "type": "string",