footprintjs 0.10.2 → 0.10.3

package/README.md

@@ -10,581 +10,158 @@
   <a href="https://www.npmjs.com/package/footprintjs"><img src="https://img.shields.io/npm/v/footprintjs.svg?style=flat" alt="npm version"></a>
   <a href="https://github.com/footprintjs/footPrint/blob/main/LICENSE"><img src="https://img.shields.io/badge/license-MIT-blue.svg" alt="MIT License"></a>
   <a href="https://www.npmjs.com/package/footprintjs"><img src="https://img.shields.io/npm/dm/footprintjs.svg" alt="Downloads"></a>
-  <a href="https://footprintjs.github.io/footprint-playground/"><img src="https://img.shields.io/badge/Try_it-Interactive_Playground-6366f1?style=flat&logo=" alt="Interactive Playground"></a>
+  <a href="https://footprintjs.github.io/footprint-demo/"><img src="https://img.shields.io/badge/Live_Demo-View_App-10b981?style=flat&logo=" alt="Live Demo"></a>
+  <a href="https://footprintjs.github.io/footprint-playground/"><img src="https://img.shields.io/badge/Playground-Try_it-6366f1?style=flat&logo=" alt="Interactive Playground"></a>
 </p>
 
 <br>
 
-**MVC is a pattern for structuring backends. FootPrint is a different pattern &mdash; the flowchart pattern &mdash; where your business logic is organized as a graph of functions with transactional state.** The code becomes self-explainable: AI can read the structure, trace every decision, and explain what happened without reconstructing from logs.
+<p align="center">
+  <img src="assets/hero.gif" alt="FootPrint demo — loan application with animated flowchart, memory inspector, and causal trace" width="800">
+</p>
 
-> FootPrint is **not** a workflow engine, pipeline builder, or orchestrator. It's a code pattern &mdash; like how React changed how we build UIs, FootPrint changes how we structure backend logic to be AI-native.
+**MVC is a pattern for backends. FootPrint is a different pattern** &mdash; the flowchart pattern &mdash; where your business logic is a graph of functions with transactional state. The code becomes self-explainable: AI reads the structure, traces every decision, and explains what happened &mdash; no hallucination.
 
 ```bash
 npm install footprintjs
 ```
 
-## Quick Start
-
-```typescript
-import { flowChart, FlowChartExecutor } from 'footprintjs';
-
-const chart = flowChart('Greet', (scope) => {
-    scope.setValue('name', 'Alice');
-  })
-  .addFunction('Personalize', (scope) => {
-    const name = scope.getValue('name');
-    scope.setValue('message', `Hello, ${name}!`);
-  })
-  .setEnableNarrative()
-  .build();
-
-const executor = new FlowChartExecutor(chart);
-const result = await executor.run();
-
-console.log(executor.getNarrative());
-// Stage 1: The process began with Greet.
-//   Step 1: Write name = "Alice"
-// Stage 2: Next, it moved on to Personalize.
-//   Step 1: Read name = "Alice"
-//   Step 2: Write message = "Hello, Alice!"
-```
-
-> **[Try it in the browser](https://footprintjs.github.io/footprint-playground/)** &mdash; no install needed
->
-> **[Browse 25+ examples](https://github.com/footprintjs/footPrint-samples)** &mdash; features, flowchart patterns, flow recorder strategies, and a full loan underwriting demo
-
 ---
 
-## Why a new pattern?
-
-**MVC** separates concerns into Model, View, Controller. It works, but the code is opaque to AI &mdash; an LLM can't trace why a request produced a specific result without parsing scattered logs.
+## The Problem
 
-**The flowchart pattern** structures the same logic as a graph of named functions with managed state. This gives you two things MVC can't:
-
-1. **Self-describing code** &mdash; The structure auto-generates tool descriptions for LLM agents. No hand-written descriptions that drift from reality.
-2. **Self-explaining execution** &mdash; Every run produces a causal trace showing what happened and why. An LLM reads the trace and explains decisions accurately &mdash; no hallucination.
+Your LLM needs to explain why your code made a decision. Without structure, it reconstructs reasoning from scattered logs &mdash; expensive, slow, and hallucinates.
 
 | | MVC / Traditional | Flowchart Pattern (FootPrint) |
 |---|---|---|
-| **Code structure** | Controllers with implicit flow | Explicit graph of named functions |
 | **LLM explains a decision** | Reconstruct from scattered logs | Read the causal trace directly |
 | **Tool descriptions for agents** | Write and maintain by hand | Auto-generated from the graph |
 | **State management** | Global/manual, race-prone | Transactional scope with atomic commits |
 | **Debugging** | `console.log` + guesswork | Time-travel replay to any stage |
 
-### Example: Loan rejection
+---
+
+## How It Works
 
-A loan application pipeline rejects Bob. The user asks: **"Why was I rejected?"**
+A loan pipeline rejects Bob. The user asks: **"Why was I rejected?"**
 
-Without FootPrint, the LLM must reconstruct the reasoning from disconnected logs &mdash; expensive, slow, and unreliable. With FootPrint, the runtime produces this trace automatically from what the code actually did:
+The runtime auto-generates this trace from what the code actually did:
 
 ```
 Stage 1: The process began with ReceiveApplication.
-  Step 1: Write app = {applicantName, annualIncome, monthlyDebts, creditScore, …}
+  Step 1: Write app = {applicantName, annualIncome, monthlyDebts, creditScore, ...}
 Stage 2: Next, it moved on to PullCreditReport.
-  Step 1: Read app = {applicantName, annualIncome, monthlyDebts, creditScore, …}
+  Step 1: Read app = {applicantName, annualIncome, monthlyDebts, creditScore, ...}
   Step 2: Write creditTier = "fair"
-  Step 3: Write creditFlags = (1 item)
 Stage 3: Next, it moved on to CalculateDTI.
-  Step 1: Read app = {applicantName, annualIncome, monthlyDebts, creditScore, …}
+  Step 1: Read app = {applicantName, annualIncome, monthlyDebts, creditScore, ...}
   Step 2: Write dtiRatio = 0.6
-  Step 3: Write dtiPercent = 60
-  Step 4: Write dtiStatus = "excessive"
-  Step 5: Write dtiFlags = (1 item)
-Stage 4: Next, it moved on to VerifyEmployment.
-  Step 1: Read app = {applicantName, annualIncome, monthlyDebts, creditScore, …}
-  Step 2: Write employmentVerified = true
-  Step 3: Write employmentFlags = (1 item)
-Stage 5: Next, it moved on to AssessRisk.
+  Step 3: Write dtiStatus = "excessive"
+Stage 4: Next, it moved on to AssessRisk.
   Step 1: Read creditTier = "fair"
   Step 2: Read dtiStatus = "excessive"
-  Step 3: Read employmentVerified = true
-  Step 4: Write riskTier = "high"
-  Step 5: Write riskFactors = (1 item)
+  Step 3: Write riskTier = "high"
 [Condition]: A decision was made, and the path taken was RejectApplication.
 ```
 
-The LLM backtracks through the trace: `riskTier="high"` &larr; `dtiStatus="excessive"` &larr; `dtiPercent=60` &larr; `app.monthlyDebts=2100`. Every variable links to its cause. Cheaper model, fewer tokens, no hallucination:
+The LLM backtracks: `riskTier="high"` &larr; `dtiStatus="excessive"` &larr; `dtiRatio=0.6` &larr; `app.monthlyDebts=2100`. Every variable links to its cause:
 
-> **LLM:** "Your application was rejected because your credit score of 580 falls in the 'fair' tier, your debt-to-income ratio of 60% exceeds the 43% maximum, and your self-employment tenure of 1 year is below the 2-year minimum. These factors combined placed you in the 'high' risk tier."
+> **LLM:** "Your application was rejected because your debt-to-income ratio of 60% exceeds the 43% maximum, your credit score of 580 falls in the 'fair' tier, and your self-employment tenure of 1 year is below the 2-year minimum."
 
 That answer came from the trace &mdash; not from the LLM's imagination.
 
 ---
 
-## The code that produced it
-
-This is regular backend code &mdash; just structured as a flowchart instead of a controller. No one wrote those trace sentences. The functions just read and write scope; the pattern produces the narrative automatically:
+## Quick Start
 
 ```typescript
-import {
-  flowChart, FlowChartExecutor, ScopeFacade, toScopeFactory,
-} from 'footprintjs';
-
-// ── Stage functions: just read and write scope ─────────────────────────
-
-const receiveApplication = (scope: ScopeFacade) => {
-  scope.setValue('app', {
-    applicantName: 'Bob',
-    annualIncome: 42_000,
-    monthlyDebts: 2_100,
-    creditScore: 580,
-    employmentType: 'self-employed',
-    employmentYears: 1,
-  });
-};
-
-const pullCreditReport = (scope: ScopeFacade) => {
-  const { creditScore } = scope.getValue('app') as any;
-  const tier = creditScore >= 740 ? 'excellent'
-    : creditScore >= 670 ? 'good'
-    : creditScore >= 580 ? 'fair' : 'poor';
-
-  scope.setValue('creditTier', tier);
-  scope.setValue('creditFlags', tier === 'fair' ? ['below-average credit'] : []);
-};
-
-const calculateDTI = (scope: ScopeFacade) => {
-  const { annualIncome, monthlyDebts } = scope.getValue('app') as any;
-  const ratio = Math.round((monthlyDebts / (annualIncome / 12)) * 100) / 100;
-
-  scope.setValue('dtiRatio', ratio);
-  scope.setValue('dtiFlags', ratio > 0.43 ? [`DTI at ${Math.round(ratio * 100)}% exceeds 43%`] : []);
-};
-
-const verifyEmployment = (scope: ScopeFacade) => {
-  const { employmentType, employmentYears } = scope.getValue('app') as any;
-  const verified = employmentType !== 'self-employed' || employmentYears >= 2;
-
-  scope.setValue('employmentVerified', verified);
-  scope.setValue('employmentFlags', !verified
-    ? [`${employmentType}, ${employmentYears}yr < 2yr minimum`] : []);
-};
-
-const assessRisk = (scope: ScopeFacade) => {
-  const tier = scope.getValue('creditTier') as string;
-  const ratio = scope.getValue('dtiRatio') as number;
-  const verified = scope.getValue('employmentVerified') as boolean;
-
-  scope.setValue('riskTier', (!verified || ratio > 0.43 || tier === 'poor') ? 'high' : 'low');
-};
-
-// Deciders return a branch ID — the only stage that needs a return value
-const loanDecider = (scope: ScopeFacade): string => {
-  const tier = scope.getValue('riskTier') as string;
-  if (tier === 'low') return 'approved';
-  if (tier === 'high') return 'rejected';
-  return 'manual-review';
-};
-
-// ── Build → Run → Narrative (D3-style chaining) ──────────────────────
-
-const chart = flowChart('ReceiveApplication', receiveApplication)
-  .setEnableNarrative()
-  .addFunction('PullCreditReport', pullCreditReport)
-  .addFunction('CalculateDTI', calculateDTI)
-  .addFunction('VerifyEmployment', verifyEmployment)
-  .addFunction('AssessRisk', assessRisk)
-  .addDeciderFunction('LoanDecision', loanDecider as any)
-    .addFunctionBranch('approved', 'Approve', () => {})
-    .addFunctionBranch('rejected', 'Reject', () => {})
-    .addFunctionBranch('manual-review', 'ManualReview', () => {})
-    .setDefault('manual-review')
+import { flowChart, FlowChartExecutor, ScopeFacade } from 'footprintjs';
+
+const chart = flowChart('FetchUser', (scope: ScopeFacade) => {
+    scope.setValue('user', { name: 'Alice', tier: 'premium' });
+  }, 'fetch-user')
+  .addFunction('ApplyDiscount', (scope: ScopeFacade) => {
+    const user = scope.getValue('user') as any;
+    const discount = user.tier === 'premium' ? 0.2 : 0.05;
+    scope.setValue('discount', discount);
+  }, 'apply-discount')
+  .addDeciderFunction('Route', (scope: ScopeFacade): string => {
+    return (scope.getValue('discount') as number) > 0.1 ? 'vip' : 'standard';
+  }, 'route')
+    .addFunctionBranch('vip', 'VIPCheckout', (scope: ScopeFacade) => {
+      scope.setValue('lane', 'VIP express');
+    })
+    .addFunctionBranch('standard', 'StandardCheckout', (scope: ScopeFacade) => {
+      scope.setValue('lane', 'Standard');
+    })
+    .setDefault('standard')
     .end()
+  .setEnableNarrative()
   .build();
 
-const executor = new FlowChartExecutor(chart, toScopeFactory(ScopeFacade));
+const executor = new FlowChartExecutor(chart);
 await executor.run();
 
-const narrative = executor.getNarrative();  // ← the trace above
-```
-
-The functions are ordinary TypeScript &mdash; no decorators, no special annotations. The flowchart pattern captures stage transitions, decisions, reads, and writes automatically. That's the difference from MVC: in MVC, this trace doesn't exist. In the flowchart pattern, it's a byproduct of the structure.
-
----
-
-## What makes it self-explainable
-
-The flowchart pattern produces two AI-readable outputs automatically &mdash; no extra code needed:
-
-### Build-time: tool description for LLM agents
-
-When you call `.build()`, the structure auto-generates `chart.description` &mdash; a complete description of what the code does:
-
-```
-FlowChart: ReceiveApplication
-Steps:
-1. ReceiveApplication
-2. PullCreditReport
-3. CalculateDTI
-4. VerifyEmployment
-5. AssessRisk
-6. LoanDecision — Decides between: approved, rejected, manual-review
-```
-
-Register this as a **tool description**. When an LLM agent has multiple tools to choose from, it can read each tool's description and pick the right one &mdash; without you writing tool descriptions by hand:
-
-```typescript
-// Each flowchart's auto-generated description becomes the tool description
-const tools = [
-  {
-    name: 'process-loan',
-    description: loanChart.description,
-    //  FlowChart: ReceiveApplication
-    //  Steps:
-    //  1. ReceiveApplication
-    //  2. PullCreditReport  ...
-    //  6. LoanDecision — Decides between: approved, rejected, manual-review
-    handler: (input) => runWithChart(loanChart, input),
-  },
-  {
-    name: 'check-fraud',
-    description: fraudChart.description,
-    //  FlowChart: AnalyzeTransaction
-    //  Steps:
-    //  1. AnalyzeTransaction
-    //  2. CheckVelocity
-    //  3. CheckGeolocation
-    //  4. FraudDecision — Decides between: allow, block, review
-    handler: (input) => runWithChart(fraudChart, input),
-  },
-];
-
-// The LLM sees exactly what each tool does — enough to pick the right one.
-// No manual description writing. The structure IS the description.
-```
-
-### Runtime: causal trace for LLM explanation
-
-After `.run()`, the trace shows what the code *actually did* &mdash; every value read, every value written, every decision made. Ship it alongside the result so any LLM can explain what happened and why.
-
-**Build-time tells the LLM what the code does. Runtime tells the LLM what the code did.** That's what makes it self-explainable &mdash; the pattern produces both automatically.
-
----
-
-## How the pattern works
-
-The flowchart pattern has three parts &mdash; the same way MVC has Model, View, Controller:
-
-1. **Builder** &mdash; Define your business logic as a graph of named functions. Like how a controller defines routes, but the structure is an explicit flowchart.
-2. **Scope** &mdash; Transactional state shared across stages. Writes are buffered and committed atomically. This replaces scattered state management.
-3. **Engine** &mdash; Executes the graph and auto-generates the causal trace. You write functions; the pattern produces the explanation.
-
-```
-┌─────────────────────┐      ┌─────────────────────┐      ┌─────────────────────┐
-│   FlowChartBuilder  │─────>│      FlowChart      │─────>│  FlowChartExecutor  │
-│   (Build-time DSL)  │      │   (Compiled Tree)   │      │   (Runtime Engine)  │
-└─────────────────────┘      └─────────────────────┘      └─────────────────────┘
-        │                            │                            │
-        │ .start()                   │ .build()                   │ .run()
-        │ .addFunction()             │ .description               │ .getNarrative()
-        │ .addDeciderFunction()      │ .stageDescriptions         │ .getSnapshot()
-        │ .addSubFlowChart()         │                            │
-        └────────────────────────────┴────────────────────────────┘
-```
-
----
-
-## Documentation
-
-| Guide | What it covers |
-|-------|---------------|
-| **[Patterns](docs/guides/patterns.md)** | All 7 flowchart patterns with diagrams |
-| **[Scope](docs/guides/scope.md)** | Typed, raw, and Zod scope; recorders; protection |
-| **[Execution Control](docs/guides/execution.md)** | breakFn, cancellation, timeout, fail-fast, loops |
-| **[Error Handling](docs/guides/error-handling.md)** | Commit-on-error, debug recorder, post-mortem |
-| **[Flow Recorders](docs/guides/flow-recorders.md)** | Pluggable observers for control flow narrative — 7 built-in strategies |
-| **[Contracts](docs/guides/contracts.md)** | defineContract, OpenAPI 3.1, Zod vs JSON Schema |
-| **[Internals](docs/internals/)** | Architecture deep-dives for each library |
-
----
-
-## Patterns
-
-Seven composition patterns &mdash; linear, parallel, conditional, multi-select, subflow, streaming, and loops:
-
-```typescript
-// Linear: A → B → C
-flowChart('A', fnA).addFunction('B', fnB).addFunction('C', fnC).build();
-
-// Parallel fork
-flowChart('Fetch', fetchFn)
-  .addListOfFunction([
-    { id: 'html', name: 'ParseHTML', fn: parseHTML },
-    { id: 'css',  name: 'ParseCSS',  fn: parseCSS },
-  ])
-  .addFunction('Merge', mergeFn)
-  .build();
-
-// Conditional branching (decider)
-flowChart('Classify', classifyFn)
-  .addDeciderFunction('Route', routeFn)
-    .addFunctionBranch('digital', 'DigitalDelivery', digitalFn)
-    .addFunctionBranch('physical', 'ShipPackage', shipFn)
-    .setDefault('physical')
-    .end()
-  .build();
-
-// Subflow composition
-flowChart('Router', routerFn)
-  .addSubFlowChart('faq', faqFlow, 'FAQ Handler')
-  .addSubFlowChart('rag', ragFlow, 'RAG Handler')
-  .build();
-
-// Loops
-flowChart('Init', initFn)
-  .addFunction('Retry', retryFn, 'retry')
-  .addDeciderFunction('Check', checkFn)
-    .addFunctionBranch('again', 'Process', processFn)
-    .addFunctionBranch('done', 'Finish', finishFn)
-    .end()
-  .loopTo('retry')
-  .build();
-```
-
-**[Full patterns guide &rarr;](docs/guides/patterns.md)** &mdash; all seven patterns with diagrams and composition examples
-
----
-
-## Scope
-
-Each stage receives a **scope** &mdash; a transactional interface to shared state:
-
-```typescript
-// Typed scope (recommended)
-class LoanScope extends ScopeFacade {
-  get creditScore(): number { return this.getValue('creditScore') as number; }
-}
-
-// Validated scope (Zod)
-const scopeFactory = defineScopeFromZod(z.object({
-  creditScore: z.number(),
-  riskTier: z.string().optional(),
-}));
-
-// Raw scope
-scope.setValue('total', 79.98);
-scope.updateValue('config', { retries: 3 });
+console.log(executor.getNarrative());
+// Stage 1: The process began with FetchUser.
+//   Step 1: Write user = {name: "Alice", tier: "premium"}
+// Stage 2: Next, it moved on to ApplyDiscount.
+//   Step 1: Read user = {name: "Alice", tier: "premium"}
+//   Step 2: Write discount = 0.2
+// Stage 3: A decision was made, and the path taken was VIPCheckout.
+//   Step 1: Write lane = "VIP express"
 ```
 
-Pluggable recorders observe every operation: `DebugRecorder`, `MetricRecorder`, `NarrativeRecorder`, or bring your own.
-
-**[Full scope guide &rarr;](docs/guides/scope.md)** &mdash; typed/raw/Zod scope, recorders, protection, provider system
+> **[Try it in the browser](https://footprintjs.github.io/footprint-playground/)** &mdash; no install needed
+>
+> **[Browse 25+ examples](https://github.com/footprintjs/footPrint-samples)** &mdash; patterns, recorders, and a full loan underwriting demo
 
 ---
 
-## Key Features
+## Features
 
 | Feature | Description |
 |---------|-------------|
 | **Causal Traces** | Every read/write captured &mdash; LLMs backtrack through variables to find causes |
 | **Auto Narrative** | Build-time descriptions for tool selection, runtime traces for explanation |
-| **Not a DAG** | Supports loops, re-entry, and partial/resumed execution |
-| **Parallel Fan-Out/In** | Fork pattern with automatic result aggregation (optional fail-fast) |
-| **Cancellation** | AbortSignal and timeout support for long-running LLM calls |
-| **Early Termination** | `breakFn()` stops the pipeline after the current stage |
-| **Patch-Based State** | Atomic commits, safe merges, no race conditions |
-| **Composable Subflows** | Mount entire flowcharts as nodes in larger workflows |
-| **Streaming** | Built-in streaming stages for LLM token emission |
-| **PII Redaction** | Per-key `setValue(key, value, true)` or declarative `RedactionPolicy` with exact keys, regex patterns, and field-level scrubbing (dot-notation for nested paths) &mdash; plus `getRedactionReport()` audit trail ([guide](docs/guides/scope.md#redaction-pii-protection)) |
-| **Pluggable Recorders** | DebugRecorder, MetricRecorder, NarrativeRecorder &mdash; or bring your own |
-| **Flow Recorders** | 7 narrative strategies for loop summarization &mdash; Windowed, Silent, Adaptive, Progressive, Milestone, RLE, Separate &mdash; or build custom ([examples](https://github.com/footprintjs/footPrint-samples/tree/main/examples/flow-recorders)) |
-
----
-
-## Execution Control & Error Handling
-
-Three levels of control: `breakFn()` (graceful stop), `throw` (hard abort), `AbortSignal` (external cancellation):
-
-```typescript
-// Graceful stop — complete this stage, skip remaining
-const validate = async (scope: ScopeFacade, breakFn: () => void) => {
-  if (scope.getValue('amount') > 50_000) { breakFn(); }
-};
-
-// Timeout / external cancellation
-await executor.run({ timeoutMs: 30_000 });
-await executor.run({ signal: controller.signal });
-```
-
-When a stage throws, the engine commits the trace *before* re-throwing &mdash; so `getSnapshot()` captures everything up to the failure point, including partial writes and error metadata.
-
-**[Execution control guide &rarr;](docs/guides/execution.md)** &mdash; breakFn, cancellation, timeout, fail-fast forks, loops
-
-**[Error handling guide &rarr;](docs/guides/error-handling.md)** &mdash; commit-on-error, debug recorder, error narrative, post-mortem
-
----
-
-## API Reference
-
-### Builder
-
-| Method | Description |
-|--------|-------------|
-| `start(name, fn?)` | Define root stage |
-| `addFunction(name, fn?)` | Add linear next stage |
-| `addListOfFunction(specs, opts?)` | Add parallel children (fork). Options: `{ failFast? }` |
-| `addDeciderFunction(name, fn)` | Single-choice branching (returns one branch ID) |
-| `addSelectorFunction(name, fn)` | Multi-choice branching (returns multiple branch IDs) |
-| `addSubFlowChart(id, flow)` | Mount subflow as parallel child |
-| `addSubFlowChartNext(id, flow)` | Mount subflow as linear next |
-| `addStreamingFunction(name, streamId?, fn?)` | Add streaming stage |
-| `addTraversalExtractor(fn)` | Register per-stage data extractor |
-| `setEnableNarrative()` | Enable runtime narrative generation |
-| `loopTo(stageId)` | Loop back to earlier stage |
-| `build()` | Compile to FlowChart |
-| `execute(scopeFactory?)` | Build + run (convenience) |
-| `toSpec()` | Export pure JSON (no functions) |
-| `toMermaid()` | Generate Mermaid diagram |
-
-### Executor
-
-| Method | Description |
-|--------|-------------|
-| `run(options?)` | Execute the flowchart. Options: `{ signal?, timeoutMs? }` |
-| `getNarrative()` | Combined narrative (flow + data) with ScopeFacade; flow-only otherwise |
-| `getFlowNarrative()` | Flow-only narrative sentences |
-| `attachFlowRecorder(recorder)` | Attach a FlowRecorder for pluggable narrative control |
-| `detachFlowRecorder(id)` | Detach a FlowRecorder by id |
-| `getNarrativeEntries()` | Structured `CombinedNarrativeEntry[]` for programmatic use |
-| `getSnapshot()` | Full execution tree + state |
-| `getExtractedResults()` | Extractor results map |
-| `getEnrichedResults()` | Enriched snapshots (scope state, debug info, output) |
-| `getSubflowResults()` | Nested subflow execution data |
-| `getRuntimeStructure()` | Serialized pipeline for visualization |
-
----
-
-## How FootPrint Compares
-
-FootPrint is a **code pattern**, not an orchestrator. It runs in your process, not as a separate service.
-
-| Aspect | MVC / async-await | FootPrint (flowchart pattern) | Temporal / Step Functions |
-|--------|-------------------|-------------------------------|--------------------------|
-| **What it is** | Code pattern | Code pattern | External orchestrator |
-| **Runs where** | In your process | In your process | Separate service |
-| **Control flow** | Implicit in code | Explicit graph of functions | External state machine |
-| **State** | Manual / global | Transactional scope | Durable storage |
-| **AI explains decisions** | Parse logs (hallucination-prone) | Read the causal trace (accurate) | Parse event history |
-| **Tool descriptions** | Write by hand | Auto-generated from structure | Write by hand |
-| **Debugging** | Stack traces | Time-travel replay | Event history |
-| **Complexity** | Low | Low-medium | High |
-
----
-
-## Performance
-
-Measured on Node v22, Apple Silicon. Run `npm run bench` to reproduce.
-
-| Benchmark | Time | Detail |
-|-----------|------|--------|
-| **Write 1K keys** | 811µs | ~1.2M ops/s |
-| **Write 10K keys** | 5.4ms | ~1.8M ops/s |
-| **Read 100K keys** | 8.7ms | ~11.5M ops/s |
-| **10 stages (linear)** | 106µs | 0.011ms/stage |
-| **200 stages (linear)** | 4.7ms | 0.023ms/stage |
-| **500 stages (linear)** | 20ms | 0.040ms/stage |
-| **100 concurrent pipelines** | 2.3ms | 3-stage each |
-| **1,000 concurrent pipelines** | 24ms | 3-stage each |
-| **structuredClone 1KB** | 2µs | per call |
-| **structuredClone 100KB** | 76µs | per call |
-| **structuredClone 1MB** | 2.5ms | per call |
-| **Time-travel 100 commits** | 75µs | 0.001ms/commit |
-| **Time-travel 500 commits** | 385µs | 0.001ms/commit |
-| **Commit with 100 writes** | 375µs | single stage |
-
-**Bottom line:** A 200-stage pipeline completes in under 5ms. The primary cost at scale is `structuredClone` — keep state objects under 100KB per stage for sub-millisecond commit overhead.
-
----
-
-## Contract & OpenAPI
-
-Define I/O schemas (Zod or raw JSON Schema) and auto-generate OpenAPI 3.1 specs:
-
-```typescript
-import { flowChart, defineContract } from 'footprintjs';
-import { z } from 'zod';
-
-const contract = defineContract(chart, {
-  inputSchema: z.object({ applicantName: z.string(), creditScore: z.number() }),
-  outputSchema: z.object({ decision: z.enum(['approved', 'rejected']) }),
-});
-
-const spec = contract.toOpenAPI({ version: '1.0.0', basePath: '/api' });
-```
-
-Zod is an **optional peer dependency** &mdash; zero bundle impact if not used.
-
-**[Full contracts guide &rarr;](docs/guides/contracts.md)** &mdash; defineContract, OpenAPI generation, Zod vs JSON Schema, builder-level schemas
-
----
-
-## Architecture
-
-FootPrint is the reference implementation of the flowchart pattern &mdash; six independent libraries, each usable standalone:
-
-```
-src/lib/
-├── memory/    Transactional state (SharedMemory, StageContext, EventLog, TransactionBuffer)
-├── builder/   Fluent flowchart DSL (FlowChartBuilder, DeciderList, SelectorFnList)
-├── scope/     Scope facades, recorders, protection, Zod integration
-├── engine/    DFS traversal, handlers, narrative generators
-├── runner/    Execution convenience (FlowChartExecutor, ExecutionRuntime)
-└── contract/  I/O schemas, Zod→JSON Schema, OpenAPI 3.1 generation
-```
-
-**[Architecture deep-dives &rarr;](docs/internals/)** &mdash; each library has its own README with primitives, design decisions, and dependency graphs
+| **7 Patterns** | Linear, parallel fork, conditional, multi-select, subflow, streaming, loops &mdash; [guide](docs/guides/patterns.md) |
+| **Transactional State** | Atomic commits, safe merges, time-travel replay &mdash; [guide](docs/guides/scope.md) |
+| **PII Redaction** | Per-key or declarative `RedactionPolicy` with audit trail &mdash; [guide](docs/guides/scope.md#redaction-pii-protection) |
+| **Flow Recorders** | 8 narrative strategies for loop compression &mdash; [guide](docs/guides/flow-recorders.md) |
+| **Contracts** | I/O schemas (Zod/JSON Schema) + OpenAPI 3.1 generation &mdash; [guide](docs/guides/contracts.md) |
+| **Cancellation** | AbortSignal, timeout, early termination via `breakFn()` &mdash; [guide](docs/guides/execution.md) |
 
 ---
 
 ## AI Coding Tool Support
 
-FootPrint ships with built-in instructions for every major AI coding assistant. Your AI tool understands the library's API, patterns, and anti-patterns out of the box.
-
-### Quick setup
+FootPrint ships with built-in instructions for every major AI coding assistant. Your AI tool understands the API, patterns, and anti-patterns out of the box.
 
 ```bash
-# After installing footprintjs, run:
 npx footprintjs-setup
 ```
 
-This interactive installer copies the right instruction files for your tool(s):
-
-| Tool | What gets installed | Format |
-|------|-------------------|--------|
-| **[Claude Code](https://claude.com/claude-code)** | `.claude/skills/footprint/SKILL.md` + `CLAUDE.md` | Interactive skill + project rules |
-| **[OpenAI Codex](https://openai.com/index/codex/)** | `AGENTS.md` | Agent instructions |
-| **[GitHub Copilot](https://github.com/features/copilot)** | `.github/copilot-instructions.md` | Custom instructions |
-| **[Cursor](https://cursor.com)** | `.cursor/rules/footprint.md` | Project rules |
-| **[Windsurf](https://windsurf.com)** | `.windsurfrules` | Project rules |
-| **[Cline](https://github.com/cline/cline)** | `.clinerules` | Project rules |
-| **[Kiro](https://kiro.dev)** | `.kiro/rules/footprint.md` | Project rules |
+| Tool | What gets installed |
+|------|-------------------|
+| **Claude Code** | `.claude/skills/footprint/SKILL.md` + `CLAUDE.md` |
+| **OpenAI Codex** | `AGENTS.md` |
+| **GitHub Copilot** | `.github/copilot-instructions.md` |
+| **Cursor** | `.cursor/rules/footprint.md` |
+| **Windsurf** | `.windsurfrules` |
+| **Cline** | `.clinerules` |
+| **Kiro** | `.kiro/rules/footprint.md` |
 
-Or install manually:
-
-```bash
-# Claude Code skill
-mkdir -p .claude/skills/footprint
-cp node_modules/footprintjs/ai-instructions/claude-code/SKILL.md .claude/skills/footprint/
-
-# Cursor rules
-mkdir -p .cursor/rules
-cp node_modules/footprintjs/ai-instructions/cursor/footprint.md .cursor/rules/
-
-# Any other tool — files are in node_modules/footprintjs/ai-instructions/
-```
+---
 
-Every file teaches the AI assistant:
-- The **Builder**, **Executor**, and **ScopeFacade** APIs
-- The **recorder system** (scope + flow, two observer layers)
-- The **core principle**: collect during traversal, never post-process
-- **Anti-patterns** to avoid (deprecated APIs, wrong state access patterns)
-- **Event ordering** that makes inline narrative collection work
+## Documentation
 
-This means any AI coding tool can help you build flowchart pipelines correctly from day one.
+| Resource | Link |
+|----------|------|
+| **Guides** | [Patterns](docs/guides/patterns.md) &middot; [Scope](docs/guides/scope.md) &middot; [Execution](docs/guides/execution.md) &middot; [Errors](docs/guides/error-handling.md) &middot; [Flow Recorders](docs/guides/flow-recorders.md) &middot; [Contracts](docs/guides/contracts.md) |
+| **Reference** | [API Reference](docs/guides/api-reference.md) &middot; [Performance Benchmarks](docs/guides/performance.md) |
+| **Architecture** | [Internals](docs/internals/) &mdash; six independent libraries, each with its own README |
+| **Try it** | [Interactive Playground](https://footprintjs.github.io/footprint-playground/) &middot; [Live Demo](https://footprintjs.github.io/footprint-demo/) &middot; [25+ Examples](https://github.com/footprintjs/footPrint-samples) |
 
 ---
 
-## License
-
 [MIT](./LICENSE) &copy; [Sanjay Krishna Anbalagan](https://github.com/sanjay1909)

package/package.json

@@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
 {
   "name": "footprintjs",
-  "version": "0.10.2",
+  "version": "0.10.3",
   "description": "Turn your whiteboard flowchart into running code — with automatic causal traces for LLM reasoning",
   "license": "MIT",
   "author": "Sanjay Krishna Anbalagan",