flowquery 1.0.25 → 1.0.26

package/jest.config.js

@@ -1,11 +1,8 @@
 /** @type {import('ts-jest').JestConfigWithTsJest} **/
 module.exports = {
-  testEnvironment: "node",
-  transform: {
-    "^.+.tsx?$": ["ts-jest",{}],
-  },
-  testPathIgnorePatterns: [
-    "/node_modules/",
-    "/flowquery-vscode/test/"
-  ],
-};
+    testEnvironment: "node",
+    transform: {
+        "^.+.tsx?$": ["ts-jest", {}],
+    },
+    testPathIgnorePatterns: ["/node_modules/", "/flowquery-vscode/test/", "/misc/apps/"],
+};

package/misc/apps/RAG/data/chats.json

@@ -0,0 +1,302 @@
+[
+  {
+    "id": "ch-001",
+    "topic": "Project Aurora",
+    "type": "channel",
+    "teamName": "Product & Engineering",
+    "members": ["u-002", "u-003", "u-005", "u-006", "u-007", "u-008", "u-009"],
+    "messages": [
+      {
+        "id": "msg-001",
+        "from": "u-008",
+        "timestamp": "2026-01-10T09:15:00Z",
+        "body": "Hey team! Mia just shared the Aurora mockups. They look amazing. Let's review before the design meeting Tuesday.",
+        "reactions": [{ "type": "thumbsUp", "users": ["u-005", "u-009"] }],
+        "mentions": ["u-009"],
+        "relatedFiles": ["f-003"]
+      },
+      {
+        "id": "msg-002",
+        "from": "u-005",
+        "timestamp": "2026-01-10T09:32:00Z",
+        "body": "Just looked through them - the drag-and-drop widget approach is really clean. I think we can leverage the existing React DnD library for that. Should be straightforward.",
+        "reactions": [{ "type": "thumbsUp", "users": ["u-009", "u-008"] }],
+        "mentions": []
+      },
+      {
+        "id": "msg-003",
+        "from": "u-009",
+        "timestamp": "2026-01-10T09:40:00Z",
+        "body": "Thanks Emily! I designed the grid system with 12-column breakpoints so it maps well to a component-based layout. Happy to walk through the interaction specs.",
+        "reactions": [],
+        "mentions": ["u-005"]
+      },
+      {
+        "id": "msg-004",
+        "from": "u-002",
+        "timestamp": "2026-01-10T10:05:00Z",
+        "body": "Great collaboration you two. @Liam, can you make sure we have story points estimated for the frontend work before sprint planning Monday?",
+        "reactions": [{ "type": "thumbsUp", "users": ["u-008"] }],
+        "mentions": ["u-008"]
+      },
+      {
+        "id": "msg-005",
+        "from": "u-008",
+        "timestamp": "2026-01-10T10:08:00Z",
+        "body": "Will do. I'll break it into epics: widget framework, chart components, real-time data layer, and settings/preferences.",
+        "reactions": [],
+        "mentions": []
+      }
+    ]
+  },
+  {
+    "id": "ch-002",
+    "topic": "DevOps & Infrastructure",
+    "type": "channel",
+    "teamName": "Engineering",
+    "members": ["u-002", "u-005", "u-006", "u-007", "u-012"],
+    "messages": [
+      {
+        "id": "msg-006",
+        "from": "u-007",
+        "timestamp": "2026-01-08T11:00:00Z",
+        "body": "Migration plan for AKS is shared in the Engineering folder. @David, can you review the CosmosDB connection string migration section? Want to make sure the failover logic is right.",
+        "reactions": [],
+        "mentions": ["u-006"],
+        "relatedFiles": ["f-004"]
+      },
+      {
+        "id": "msg-007",
+        "from": "u-006",
+        "timestamp": "2026-01-08T11:25:00Z",
+        "body": "Looking at it now. One thing - we should use managed identity instead of connection strings for the new cluster. I'll update the Terraform configs.",
+        "reactions": [{ "type": "thumbsUp", "users": ["u-007", "u-012"] }],
+        "mentions": []
+      },
+      {
+        "id": "msg-008",
+        "from": "u-012",
+        "timestamp": "2026-01-08T11:45:00Z",
+        "body": "Good call David. I've already set up the managed identity in Azure AD for the staging subscription. I'll send you the resource IDs.",
+        "reactions": [{ "type": "heart", "users": ["u-006"] }],
+        "mentions": ["u-006"]
+      },
+      {
+        "id": "msg-009",
+        "from": "u-007",
+        "timestamp": "2026-01-08T12:00:00Z",
+        "body": "Perfect teamwork 🎉 Updated the plan to reflect managed identity approach. The staging migration window is confirmed for Jan 20-24. I'll send a calendar invite.",
+        "reactions": [{ "type": "thumbsUp", "users": ["u-002", "u-006", "u-012"] }],
+        "mentions": [],
+        "relatedEvents": ["ev-005"]
+      }
+    ]
+  },
+  {
+    "id": "ch-003",
+    "topic": null,
+    "type": "oneOnOne",
+    "teamName": null,
+    "members": ["u-004", "u-010"],
+    "messages": [
+      {
+        "id": "msg-010",
+        "from": "u-010",
+        "timestamp": "2026-01-09T14:50:00Z",
+        "body": "James, just got off the call with Contoso. They're in! 200 seats. 🎉",
+        "reactions": [{ "type": "celebrate", "users": ["u-004"] }],
+        "mentions": []
+      },
+      {
+        "id": "msg-011",
+        "from": "u-004",
+        "timestamp": "2026-01-09T14:52:00Z",
+        "body": "That's incredible Ryan!! Best news all week. Can you send me the details over email so I can loop in Sarah and Marcus?",
+        "reactions": [],
+        "mentions": []
+      },
+      {
+        "id": "msg-012",
+        "from": "u-010",
+        "timestamp": "2026-01-09T14:55:00Z",
+        "body": "Sending now. They need SSO scoping and a data residency conversation. I told them we'd get back to them by end of next week.",
+        "reactions": [{ "type": "thumbsUp", "users": ["u-004"] }],
+        "mentions": [],
+        "relatedEmails": ["em-005"]
+      }
+    ]
+  },
+  {
+    "id": "ch-004",
+    "topic": "Security & Compliance",
+    "type": "channel",
+    "teamName": "Engineering",
+    "members": ["u-002", "u-005", "u-006", "u-007", "u-012"],
+    "messages": [
+      {
+        "id": "msg-013",
+        "from": "u-012",
+        "timestamp": "2026-01-13T09:30:00Z",
+        "body": "Heads up team - just sent the Q4 security audit findings via email. Three items need attention within 14 days. Most critical: npm CVEs in the frontend build.",
+        "reactions": [],
+        "mentions": [],
+        "relatedEmails": ["em-009"],
+        "relatedFiles": ["f-007"]
+      },
+      {
+        "id": "msg-014",
+        "from": "u-005",
+        "timestamp": "2026-01-13T09:45:00Z",
+        "body": "I saw the report. Two of the three CVEs are in transitive dependencies. I can bump the parent packages and run the test suite today.",
+        "reactions": [{ "type": "thumbsUp", "users": ["u-012", "u-002"] }],
+        "mentions": []
+      },
+      {
+        "id": "msg-015",
+        "from": "u-007",
+        "timestamp": "2026-01-13T10:00:00Z",
+        "body": "I'll handle the TLS 1.0 deprecation on the legacy gateway. Should be a config change + testing. @Noah, can you verify from the network side after I push?",
+        "reactions": [],
+        "mentions": ["u-012"]
+      },
+      {
+        "id": "msg-016",
+        "from": "u-012",
+        "timestamp": "2026-01-13T10:05:00Z",
+        "body": "Absolutely. I'll set up the TLS scanner to validate. For the service account permissions, I can tighten those in Azure AD this afternoon - just need Marcus to approve the scope changes.",
+        "reactions": [{ "type": "thumbsUp", "users": ["u-002"] }],
+        "mentions": ["u-002"]
+      },
+      {
+        "id": "msg-017",
+        "from": "u-002",
+        "timestamp": "2026-01-13T10:12:00Z",
+        "body": "Approved. Go ahead Noah. And let's add the security items to sprint 25 backlog. @Liam can you create the tickets?",
+        "reactions": [{ "type": "thumbsUp", "users": ["u-012", "u-008"] }],
+        "mentions": ["u-008"]
+      }
+    ]
+  },
+  {
+    "id": "ch-005",
+    "topic": null,
+    "type": "oneOnOne",
+    "teamName": null,
+    "members": ["u-003", "u-009"],
+    "messages": [
+      {
+        "id": "msg-018",
+        "from": "u-003",
+        "timestamp": "2026-01-10T09:00:00Z",
+        "body": "Mia, the mockups look fantastic! Quick question - did we consider the accessibility requirements for the color contrast in dark mode?",
+        "reactions": [],
+        "mentions": [],
+        "relatedFiles": ["f-003"]
+      },
+      {
+        "id": "msg-019",
+        "from": "u-009",
+        "timestamp": "2026-01-10T09:10:00Z",
+        "body": "Yes! All color combinations meet WCAG 2.1 AA standards. I used the Figma contrast checker plugin. I'll add the accessibility notes to the design spec doc.",
+        "reactions": [{ "type": "heart", "users": ["u-003"] }],
+        "mentions": []
+      },
+      {
+        "id": "msg-020",
+        "from": "u-003",
+        "timestamp": "2026-01-10T09:12:00Z",
+        "body": "Perfect. Let's make sure Emily knows about the ARIA roles needed for the drag-and-drop. Great work!",
+        "reactions": [{ "type": "thumbsUp", "users": ["u-009"] }],
+        "mentions": ["u-005"]
+      }
+    ]
+  },
+  {
+    "id": "ch-006",
+    "topic": "Sales & Marketing",
+    "type": "channel",
+    "teamName": "Sales & Marketing",
+    "members": ["u-004", "u-010", "u-011"],
+    "messages": [
+      {
+        "id": "msg-021",
+        "from": "u-011",
+        "timestamp": "2026-01-12T14:00:00Z",
+        "body": "Blog post draft is out for review. @James and @Sarah have it. Targeting Jan 15th publish date.",
+        "reactions": [],
+        "mentions": ["u-004"],
+        "relatedEmails": ["em-008"],
+        "relatedFiles": ["f-006"]
+      },
+      {
+        "id": "msg-022",
+        "from": "u-004",
+        "timestamp": "2026-01-12T14:15:00Z",
+        "body": "Great timing Olivia. Also - Fabrikam wants to do a joint webinar Feb 12th. Can you start planning the logistics?",
+        "reactions": [],
+        "mentions": [],
+        "relatedEmails": ["em-011"]
+      },
+      {
+        "id": "msg-023",
+        "from": "u-011",
+        "timestamp": "2026-01-12T14:20:00Z",
+        "body": "On it! I'll draft a landing page and promotional email sequence. We should aim for 200+ registrations. Ryan, can you share the Contoso win as a case study teaser?",
+        "reactions": [{ "type": "thumbsUp", "users": ["u-004"] }],
+        "mentions": ["u-010"]
+      },
+      {
+        "id": "msg-024",
+        "from": "u-010",
+        "timestamp": "2026-01-12T14:30:00Z",
+        "body": "Definitely! Once the deal is signed I'll get a quote from their CTO. Should make great social proof.",
+        "reactions": [{ "type": "fire", "users": ["u-011", "u-004"] }],
+        "mentions": []
+      }
+    ]
+  },
+  {
+    "id": "ch-007",
+    "topic": null,
+    "type": "groupChat",
+    "teamName": null,
+    "members": ["u-005", "u-006", "u-007"],
+    "messages": [
+      {
+        "id": "msg-025",
+        "from": "u-006",
+        "timestamp": "2026-01-16T12:00:00Z",
+        "body": "Hey, did either of you see the Python SDK beta results? 9 out of 12 rated DX as excellent or good!",
+        "reactions": [{ "type": "celebrate", "users": ["u-005", "u-007"] }],
+        "mentions": [],
+        "relatedEmails": ["em-012"],
+        "relatedFiles": ["f-008"]
+      },
+      {
+        "id": "msg-026",
+        "from": "u-005",
+        "timestamp": "2026-01-16T12:05:00Z",
+        "body": "That's awesome David! The auth token refresh bugs - are those in the same area I refactored last sprint?",
+        "reactions": [],
+        "mentions": ["u-006"]
+      },
+      {
+        "id": "msg-027",
+        "from": "u-006",
+        "timestamp": "2026-01-16T12:10:00Z",
+        "body": "Different code path actually. It's the background renewal timer in the async client. I have a fix ready, just need to add retry logic.",
+        "reactions": [{ "type": "thumbsUp", "users": ["u-005"] }],
+        "mentions": []
+      },
+      {
+        "id": "msg-028",
+        "from": "u-007",
+        "timestamp": "2026-01-16T12:15:00Z",
+        "body": "Nice work both of you! David, make sure the fix goes through the security scan pipeline before merging. Noah flagged some dependency issues yesterday.",
+        "reactions": [{ "type": "thumbsUp", "users": ["u-006"] }],
+        "mentions": ["u-006"],
+        "relatedEmails": ["em-009"]
+      }
+    ]
+  }
+]

package/misc/apps/RAG/data/emails.json

@@ -0,0 +1,182 @@
+[
+  {
+    "id": "em-001",
+    "subject": "Q1 2026 Roadmap Review",
+    "from": "u-003",
+    "to": ["u-001", "u-002", "u-004"],
+    "cc": ["u-008"],
+    "receivedDateTime": "2026-01-06T09:15:00Z",
+    "body": "Hi team,\n\nI've put together the Q1 2026 roadmap draft based on our December planning sessions. Key highlights include:\n\n1. Launch the new Analytics Dashboard (Project Aurora)\n2. API v3 rollout with GraphQL support\n3. Enterprise SSO improvements\n\nPlease review the attached deck and share feedback before our Thursday sync.\n\nBest,\nPriya",
+    "importance": "high",
+    "hasAttachments": true,
+    "attachments": ["f-001"],
+    "isRead": true,
+    "conversationId": "conv-001",
+    "categories": ["Roadmap", "Q1 Planning"]
+  },
+  {
+    "id": "em-002",
+    "subject": "Re: Q1 2026 Roadmap Review",
+    "from": "u-002",
+    "to": ["u-003"],
+    "cc": ["u-001", "u-004", "u-008"],
+    "receivedDateTime": "2026-01-06T11:42:00Z",
+    "body": "Priya,\n\nLooks solid. A couple of thoughts:\n\n- The GraphQL migration timeline seems aggressive. Emily and David estimate 6 weeks minimum for the schema design alone. Can we discuss phasing?\n- We need to factor in the infrastructure upgrades Ana is planning for late January.\n\nLet's dig into this Thursday.\n\nMarcus",
+    "importance": "normal",
+    "hasAttachments": false,
+    "attachments": [],
+    "isRead": true,
+    "conversationId": "conv-001",
+    "categories": ["Roadmap"]
+  },
+  {
+    "id": "em-003",
+    "subject": "Re: Q1 2026 Roadmap Review",
+    "from": "u-001",
+    "to": ["u-003", "u-002"],
+    "cc": ["u-004"],
+    "receivedDateTime": "2026-01-06T14:05:00Z",
+    "body": "Both great points. Priya, let's also make sure we have clear success metrics for each initiative. James, can you bring customer feedback data from the enterprise accounts to the Thursday meeting?\n\nSarah",
+    "importance": "normal",
+    "hasAttachments": false,
+    "attachments": [],
+    "isRead": true,
+    "conversationId": "conv-001",
+    "categories": ["Roadmap"]
+  },
+  {
+    "id": "em-004",
+    "subject": "Infrastructure Upgrade Plan - K8s Migration",
+    "from": "u-007",
+    "to": ["u-002"],
+    "cc": ["u-005", "u-006"],
+    "receivedDateTime": "2026-01-08T10:30:00Z",
+    "body": "Hi Marcus,\n\nI've completed the assessment for migrating our staging environment to the new AKS cluster. Summary:\n\n- Estimated downtime: 2 hours during off-peak\n- Cost savings: ~18% on compute after migration\n- Timeline: Jan 20-24 for staging, Feb 3-7 for production\n\nI've documented the full plan in the shared engineering folder. David is helping with the database migration scripts.\n\nLet me know if you'd like to walk through it before I present to the team.\n\nAna",
+    "importance": "high",
+    "hasAttachments": true,
+    "attachments": ["f-004"],
+    "isRead": true,
+    "conversationId": "conv-002",
+    "categories": ["Infrastructure", "DevOps"]
+  },
+  {
+    "id": "em-005",
+    "subject": "Contoso Enterprise Deal - Update",
+    "from": "u-010",
+    "to": ["u-004"],
+    "cc": [],
+    "receivedDateTime": "2026-01-09T15:20:00Z",
+    "body": "James,\n\nGreat news on the Contoso account. After last week's demo, they're moving forward with a 200-seat enterprise license. They want:\n\n1. Custom SSO integration (SAML + OIDC)\n2. Dedicated support SLA\n3. On-prem data residency option\n\nTotal deal value: $340K ARR. I've updated the pipeline in Salesforce. Can we loop in Marcus for the SSO technical scoping?\n\nRyan",
+    "importance": "high",
+    "hasAttachments": false,
+    "attachments": [],
+    "isRead": true,
+    "conversationId": "conv-003",
+    "categories": ["Sales", "Enterprise"]
+  },
+  {
+    "id": "em-006",
+    "subject": "Re: Contoso Enterprise Deal - Update",
+    "from": "u-004",
+    "to": ["u-010"],
+    "cc": ["u-001", "u-002"],
+    "receivedDateTime": "2026-01-09T16:45:00Z",
+    "body": "Excellent work Ryan! This is our biggest enterprise deal this quarter.\n\nSarah - FYI on this win. Marcus - can your team scope the SSO and data residency requirements? I want to get back to Contoso by end of next week.\n\nJames",
+    "importance": "high",
+    "hasAttachments": false,
+    "attachments": [],
+    "isRead": true,
+    "conversationId": "conv-003",
+    "categories": ["Sales", "Enterprise"]
+  },
+  {
+    "id": "em-007",
+    "subject": "Analytics Dashboard Mockups Ready",
+    "from": "u-009",
+    "to": ["u-008", "u-003"],
+    "cc": ["u-005"],
+    "receivedDateTime": "2026-01-10T08:50:00Z",
+    "body": "Hi Liam & Priya,\n\nThe first round of mockups for Project Aurora is ready for review. I've created three layout options based on the user research sessions we ran in December.\n\nKey design decisions:\n- Dark mode default with light mode toggle\n- Drag-and-drop widget customization\n- Real-time data refresh indicators\n\nThe Figma file is linked in the shared project folder. Emily, I'd love your input on the component architecture feasibility.\n\nMia",
+    "importance": "normal",
+    "hasAttachments": true,
+    "attachments": ["f-003"],
+    "isRead": true,
+    "conversationId": "conv-004",
+    "categories": ["Project Aurora", "Design"]
+  },
+  {
+    "id": "em-008",
+    "subject": "Blog Post Draft: 2025 Year in Review",
+    "from": "u-011",
+    "to": ["u-004", "u-001"],
+    "cc": [],
+    "receivedDateTime": "2026-01-12T13:00:00Z",
+    "body": "Hi James & Sarah,\n\nI've drafted our 2025 Year in Review blog post highlighting key milestones:\n\n- 3x customer growth\n- API v2 launch\n- SOC 2 Type II certification\n- Partnership with Fabrikam\n\nPlease review and let me know if there's anything to add or adjust in tone. I'd like to publish by Jan 15th.\n\nOlivia",
+    "importance": "normal",
+    "hasAttachments": true,
+    "attachments": ["f-006"],
+    "isRead": false,
+    "conversationId": "conv-005",
+    "categories": ["Marketing", "Content"]
+  },
+  {
+    "id": "em-009",
+    "subject": "Security Audit Findings - Action Required",
+    "from": "u-012",
+    "to": ["u-002", "u-007"],
+    "cc": ["u-001"],
+    "receivedDateTime": "2026-01-13T09:10:00Z",
+    "body": "Marcus & Ana,\n\nOur quarterly security scan flagged a few items that need attention:\n\n1. Three npm packages with known CVEs in the frontend build (medium severity)\n2. TLS 1.0 still enabled on the legacy API gateway\n3. Two service accounts with overly broad permissions in Azure AD\n\nI've documented details and remediation steps in the attached report. Items 1 and 2 should be addressed within 14 days per our security policy.\n\nNoah",
+    "importance": "high",
+    "hasAttachments": true,
+    "attachments": ["f-007"],
+    "isRead": true,
+    "conversationId": "conv-006",
+    "categories": ["Security", "Compliance"]
+  },
+  {
+    "id": "em-010",
+    "subject": "Sprint 24 Retrospective Notes",
+    "from": "u-008",
+    "to": ["u-002", "u-005", "u-006", "u-007"],
+    "cc": ["u-003"],
+    "receivedDateTime": "2026-01-14T17:30:00Z",
+    "body": "Team,\n\nThanks for a productive retro today. Here's the summary:\n\nWhat went well:\n- Aurora frontend prototype delivered ahead of schedule\n- Great cross-team collaboration between Emily and Mia on the component library\n\nWhat to improve:\n- PR review turnaround time (target: < 24 hours)\n- Better estimation on backend tasks\n\nAction items:\n- David to set up automated PR reminder bot\n- Ana to document the new deployment checklist\n- Emily to create shared component storybook\n\nNotes are in the shared Sprint folder.\n\nLiam",
+    "importance": "normal",
+    "hasAttachments": false,
+    "attachments": [],
+    "isRead": true,
+    "conversationId": "conv-007",
+    "categories": ["Sprint", "Agile"]
+  },
+  {
+    "id": "em-011",
+    "subject": "Fabrikam Partnership - Joint Webinar Planning",
+    "from": "u-004",
+    "to": ["u-011", "u-003"],
+    "cc": ["u-001"],
+    "receivedDateTime": "2026-01-15T10:00:00Z",
+    "body": "Olivia & Priya,\n\nFabrikam wants to co-host a webinar showcasing our integration. Proposed date: Feb 12th.\n\nOlivia - can you handle the marketing logistics and landing page?\nPriya - we'll need a product demo segment, maybe 15 minutes showing the API integration.\n\nLet's discuss at our next marketing sync.\n\nJames",
+    "importance": "normal",
+    "hasAttachments": false,
+    "attachments": [],
+    "isRead": true,
+    "conversationId": "conv-008",
+    "categories": ["Partnership", "Marketing"]
+  },
+  {
+    "id": "em-012",
+    "subject": "Python SDK Beta Feedback",
+    "from": "u-006",
+    "to": ["u-002", "u-008"],
+    "cc": ["u-005"],
+    "receivedDateTime": "2026-01-16T11:20:00Z",
+    "body": "Marcus & Liam,\n\nI've compiled early feedback from the Python SDK beta testers (12 participants so far):\n\n- 9/12 rated the DX as 'excellent' or 'good'\n- Top request: async support for batch operations\n- Bug reports: 3 issues filed, all related to auth token refresh\n- Performance: 40% faster than the REST wrapper approach\n\nFull report attached. I think we're on track for GA in February if we address the auth issues.\n\nDavid",
+    "importance": "normal",
+    "hasAttachments": true,
+    "attachments": ["f-008"],
+    "isRead": true,
+    "conversationId": "conv-009",
+    "categories": ["SDK", "Beta"]
+  }
+]