flowbook 0.1.1 → 0.1.3
This diff represents the content of publicly available package versions that have been released to one of the supported registries. The information contained in this diff is provided for informational purposes only and reflects changes between package versions as they appear in their respective public registries.
- package/README.de.md +66 -3
- package/README.es.md +66 -3
- package/README.fr.md +66 -3
- package/README.ja.md +66 -3
- package/README.ko.md +66 -3
- package/README.md +66 -3
- package/README.pt-BR.md +66 -3
- package/README.ru.md +66 -3
- package/README.zh-CN.md +66 -3
- package/dist/cli.js +53 -6
- package/package.json +5 -2
- package/src/node/init.ts +46 -2
- package/src/skills/flowbook/SKILL.md +499 -0
|
@@ -0,0 +1,499 @@
|
|
|
1
|
+
---
|
|
2
|
+
name: flowbook
|
|
3
|
+
description: "Flowbook generator — analyzes codebase logic and generates Mermaid flowchart documentation (.flow.md). Auto-discovers functions, API routes, state machines, auth flows, data pipelines, and business logic, then produces browsable flowchart documentation. Triggers: 'flowbook', 'flow diagram', 'flowchart', 'generate flows', 'document flows', 'logic diagram'."
|
|
4
|
+
license: MIT
|
|
5
|
+
compatibility:
|
|
6
|
+
- Claude Code
|
|
7
|
+
- OpenAI Codex
|
|
8
|
+
- VS Code / GitHub Copilot
|
|
9
|
+
- Google Antigravity
|
|
10
|
+
- Gemini CLI
|
|
11
|
+
- Cursor
|
|
12
|
+
- Windsurf (Codeium)
|
|
13
|
+
- AmpCode
|
|
14
|
+
- OpenCode / oh-my-opencode
|
|
15
|
+
metadata:
|
|
16
|
+
author: Epsilondelta
|
|
17
|
+
version: "1.0.0"
|
|
18
|
+
tags: flowbook, flowchart, mermaid, documentation, architecture, diagram, visualization
|
|
19
|
+
---
|
|
20
|
+
|
|
21
|
+
# flowbook — Flowchart Documentation Generator
|
|
22
|
+
|
|
23
|
+
Analyze codebase logic → setup flowbook → generate `.flow.md` files → verify → build.
|
|
24
|
+
|
|
25
|
+
**Execute ALL phases in order. Do NOT skip phases. Generate flows for ALL significant logic — not just a few.**
|
|
26
|
+
|
|
27
|
+
---
|
|
28
|
+
|
|
29
|
+
## Phase 1: Project Analysis
|
|
30
|
+
|
|
31
|
+
### 1.1 Check Flowbook Existence
|
|
32
|
+
|
|
33
|
+
Check if flowbook is already set up:
|
|
34
|
+
|
|
35
|
+
- `package.json` has `"flowbook"` script → Already initialized, skip Phase 2
|
|
36
|
+
- Otherwise → Proceed to Phase 2
|
|
37
|
+
|
|
38
|
+
### 1.2 Detect Package Manager
|
|
39
|
+
|
|
40
|
+
| Lockfile | PM |
|
|
41
|
+
|----------|----|
|
|
42
|
+
| `bun.lock` or `bun.lockb` | bun |
|
|
43
|
+
| `pnpm-lock.yaml` | pnpm |
|
|
44
|
+
| `yarn.lock` | yarn |
|
|
45
|
+
| `package-lock.json` | npm |
|
|
46
|
+
|
|
47
|
+
### 1.3 Detect Framework & Language
|
|
48
|
+
|
|
49
|
+
Read `package.json` dependencies:
|
|
50
|
+
|
|
51
|
+
| Dependency | Framework |
|
|
52
|
+
|------------|-----------|
|
|
53
|
+
| `next` | Next.js |
|
|
54
|
+
| `nuxt` | Nuxt |
|
|
55
|
+
| `@sveltejs/kit` | SvelteKit |
|
|
56
|
+
| `svelte` (no kit) | Svelte |
|
|
57
|
+
| `vue` (no nuxt) | Vue |
|
|
58
|
+
| `@angular/core` | Angular |
|
|
59
|
+
| `express` / `fastify` / `hono` / `koa` | Node.js Backend |
|
|
60
|
+
| `@nestjs/core` | NestJS |
|
|
61
|
+
| `react` (no next) | React |
|
|
62
|
+
| `django` / `flask` / `fastapi` | Python Backend |
|
|
63
|
+
| `spring` | Java/Kotlin Backend |
|
|
64
|
+
| `gin` / `echo` / `fiber` | Go Backend |
|
|
65
|
+
|
|
66
|
+
Language detection:
|
|
67
|
+
- `tsconfig.json` → TypeScript
|
|
68
|
+
- `*.go` files → Go
|
|
69
|
+
- `*.py` files → Python
|
|
70
|
+
- `*.java` / `*.kt` files → Java/Kotlin
|
|
71
|
+
- Otherwise → JavaScript
|
|
72
|
+
|
|
73
|
+
### 1.4 Detect Source Structure
|
|
74
|
+
|
|
75
|
+
Scan for actual source directories:
|
|
76
|
+
|
|
77
|
+
**Frontend:**
|
|
78
|
+
- `src/components/`, `src/pages/`, `src/views/`, `src/routes/`
|
|
79
|
+
- `src/app/`, `app/`, `pages/`, `components/`
|
|
80
|
+
- `src/store/`, `src/hooks/`, `src/composables/`, `src/lib/`
|
|
81
|
+
|
|
82
|
+
**Backend:**
|
|
83
|
+
- `src/routes/`, `src/api/`, `src/controllers/`, `src/services/`
|
|
84
|
+
- `src/middleware/`, `src/handlers/`, `src/resolvers/`
|
|
85
|
+
- `routes/`, `api/`, `controllers/`, `services/`
|
|
86
|
+
|
|
87
|
+
**Shared:**
|
|
88
|
+
- `src/utils/`, `src/helpers/`, `src/lib/`
|
|
89
|
+
- `src/models/`, `src/schemas/`, `src/types/`
|
|
90
|
+
|
|
91
|
+
Only include directories that actually exist.
|
|
92
|
+
|
|
93
|
+
---
|
|
94
|
+
|
|
95
|
+
## Phase 2: Flowbook Setup
|
|
96
|
+
|
|
97
|
+
### 2.1 Initialize Flowbook
|
|
98
|
+
|
|
99
|
+
```bash
|
|
100
|
+
npx flowbook@latest init
|
|
101
|
+
```
|
|
102
|
+
|
|
103
|
+
This will:
|
|
104
|
+
- Install `flowbook` as a devDependency
|
|
105
|
+
- Add `"flowbook"` and `"build-flowbook"` scripts to `package.json`
|
|
106
|
+
- Create `flows/example.flow.md` as a starter template
|
|
107
|
+
- Add `flowbook-static` to `.gitignore`
|
|
108
|
+
|
|
109
|
+
### 2.2 Verify Setup
|
|
110
|
+
|
|
111
|
+
Check that:
|
|
112
|
+
- `package.json` contains `"flowbook": "flowbook dev"` script
|
|
113
|
+
- `flowbook` is in `devDependencies`
|
|
114
|
+
- `flows/` directory exists
|
|
115
|
+
|
|
116
|
+
### 2.3 Remove Example Flow
|
|
117
|
+
|
|
118
|
+
After verification, delete the example to replace with real flows:
|
|
119
|
+
|
|
120
|
+
```bash
|
|
121
|
+
rm flows/example.flow.md
|
|
122
|
+
```
|
|
123
|
+
|
|
124
|
+
---
|
|
125
|
+
|
|
126
|
+
## Phase 3: Codebase Analysis & Flow Discovery
|
|
127
|
+
|
|
128
|
+
This is the **most critical phase**. Deeply analyze the codebase to identify all significant logic flows.
|
|
129
|
+
|
|
130
|
+
### 3.1 Flow Categories to Discover
|
|
131
|
+
|
|
132
|
+
Scan the codebase for these flow types. For EACH one found, plan a `.flow.md` file:
|
|
133
|
+
|
|
134
|
+
#### A. API / Route Flows
|
|
135
|
+
- HTTP request → middleware chain → handler → response
|
|
136
|
+
- REST endpoints (GET, POST, PUT, DELETE)
|
|
137
|
+
- GraphQL resolvers (Query, Mutation)
|
|
138
|
+
- WebSocket message flows
|
|
139
|
+
- RPC handlers
|
|
140
|
+
|
|
141
|
+
#### B. Authentication & Authorization
|
|
142
|
+
- Login / signup / logout flows
|
|
143
|
+
- Token refresh / session management
|
|
144
|
+
- OAuth flows (redirect → callback → token exchange)
|
|
145
|
+
- Role-based access control (RBAC) decision trees
|
|
146
|
+
- Password reset / email verification
|
|
147
|
+
|
|
148
|
+
#### C. Data Flows
|
|
149
|
+
- CRUD operations (Create → Validate → Save → Respond)
|
|
150
|
+
- Data pipeline / ETL (Extract → Transform → Load)
|
|
151
|
+
- Form submission → validation → API call → state update
|
|
152
|
+
- File upload → process → store → respond
|
|
153
|
+
- Cache strategies (read-through, write-through, invalidation)
|
|
154
|
+
|
|
155
|
+
#### D. State Management
|
|
156
|
+
- Global state flow (Redux, Zustand, Pinia, Vuex)
|
|
157
|
+
- Action → Reducer → State → UI update cycle
|
|
158
|
+
- Side effects (Sagas, Thunks, Effects)
|
|
159
|
+
- Optimistic updates → rollback on failure
|
|
160
|
+
|
|
161
|
+
#### E. Business Logic
|
|
162
|
+
- Order processing / checkout flow
|
|
163
|
+
- Payment flow (initiate → process → confirm / refund)
|
|
164
|
+
- Notification system (trigger → queue → send → track)
|
|
165
|
+
- Scheduling / cron job flows
|
|
166
|
+
- Approval workflows (submit → review → approve/reject)
|
|
167
|
+
|
|
168
|
+
#### F. Error Handling
|
|
169
|
+
- Global error boundary flow
|
|
170
|
+
- Retry strategies (exponential backoff)
|
|
171
|
+
- Fallback / circuit breaker patterns
|
|
172
|
+
- Error logging / monitoring pipeline
|
|
173
|
+
|
|
174
|
+
#### G. DevOps & Infrastructure
|
|
175
|
+
- CI/CD pipeline stages
|
|
176
|
+
- Deployment flow
|
|
177
|
+
- Health check / monitoring flow
|
|
178
|
+
- Database migration flow
|
|
179
|
+
|
|
180
|
+
#### H. Lifecycle & Initialization
|
|
181
|
+
- App bootstrap / initialization sequence
|
|
182
|
+
- Component lifecycle flows
|
|
183
|
+
- Server startup → middleware registration → route binding → listen
|
|
184
|
+
- Database connection → migration → seeding → ready
|
|
185
|
+
|
|
186
|
+
### 3.2 How to Analyze
|
|
187
|
+
|
|
188
|
+
For each source file:
|
|
189
|
+
|
|
190
|
+
1. **Read the file** — understand its purpose
|
|
191
|
+
2. **Trace the flow** — follow function calls, conditionals, async operations
|
|
192
|
+
3. **Identify decision points** — if/else, switch, try/catch, early returns
|
|
193
|
+
4. **Map dependencies** — what other modules/services does it call?
|
|
194
|
+
5. **Note error paths** — what happens when things fail?
|
|
195
|
+
|
|
196
|
+
### 3.3 Flow Classification
|
|
197
|
+
|
|
198
|
+
For each discovered flow, determine:
|
|
199
|
+
|
|
200
|
+
| Field | How to Determine |
|
|
201
|
+
|-------|-----------------|
|
|
202
|
+
| `title` | Clear, descriptive name (e.g., "User Login Flow") |
|
|
203
|
+
| `category` | Group by domain: Authentication, API, Data, State, Business, DevOps, etc. |
|
|
204
|
+
| `tags` | Relevant keywords for filtering |
|
|
205
|
+
| `order` | Lower = more important. Core flows first. |
|
|
206
|
+
| `description` | One-line summary of what the flow does |
|
|
207
|
+
|
|
208
|
+
### 3.4 Skip Rules
|
|
209
|
+
|
|
210
|
+
Do NOT create flows for:
|
|
211
|
+
- Trivial utility functions (formatDate, slugify, etc.)
|
|
212
|
+
- Simple getters/setters with no logic
|
|
213
|
+
- Type definitions / interfaces only
|
|
214
|
+
- Test files
|
|
215
|
+
- Config files (unless they represent a complex pipeline)
|
|
216
|
+
- Files that already have corresponding `.flow.md`
|
|
217
|
+
|
|
218
|
+
---
|
|
219
|
+
|
|
220
|
+
## Phase 4: Flow File Generation
|
|
221
|
+
|
|
222
|
+
### 4.1 File Placement
|
|
223
|
+
|
|
224
|
+
Place ALL flow files in the `flows/` directory at project root:
|
|
225
|
+
|
|
226
|
+
```
|
|
227
|
+
flows/
|
|
228
|
+
├── auth-login.flow.md
|
|
229
|
+
├── auth-oauth.flow.md
|
|
230
|
+
├── api-user-crud.flow.md
|
|
231
|
+
├── data-order-processing.flow.md
|
|
232
|
+
├── state-cart-management.flow.md
|
|
233
|
+
└── devops-ci-pipeline.flow.md
|
|
234
|
+
```
|
|
235
|
+
|
|
236
|
+
**Naming convention**: `{category}-{name}.flow.md` (kebab-case)
|
|
237
|
+
|
|
238
|
+
### 4.2 Flow File Template
|
|
239
|
+
|
|
240
|
+
Every `.flow.md` file MUST follow this structure:
|
|
241
|
+
|
|
242
|
+
````markdown
|
|
243
|
+
---
|
|
244
|
+
title: {Descriptive Title}
|
|
245
|
+
category: {Category Name}
|
|
246
|
+
tags: [{tag1}, {tag2}, {tag3}]
|
|
247
|
+
order: {number}
|
|
248
|
+
description: {One-line description}
|
|
249
|
+
---
|
|
250
|
+
|
|
251
|
+
```mermaid
|
|
252
|
+
flowchart TD
|
|
253
|
+
A[Start] --> B{Decision}
|
|
254
|
+
B -->|Yes| C[Action]
|
|
255
|
+
B -->|No| D[Other Action]
|
|
256
|
+
C --> E[End]
|
|
257
|
+
D --> E
|
|
258
|
+
```
|
|
259
|
+
````
|
|
260
|
+
|
|
261
|
+
### 4.3 Mermaid Diagram Guidelines
|
|
262
|
+
|
|
263
|
+
#### Node Types
|
|
264
|
+
|
|
265
|
+
```mermaid
|
|
266
|
+
flowchart TD
|
|
267
|
+
A[Regular Step] %% Rectangle: action/process
|
|
268
|
+
B{Decision Point} %% Diamond: if/else, switch
|
|
269
|
+
C([Start / End]) %% Stadium: entry/exit points
|
|
270
|
+
D[(Database)] %% Cylinder: DB operations
|
|
271
|
+
E[[Sub-routine]] %% Subroutine: function call
|
|
272
|
+
F>Event / Signal] %% Flag: async event, webhook
|
|
273
|
+
G{{Validation}} %% Hexagon: validation step
|
|
274
|
+
H[/Input/] %% Parallelogram: user input
|
|
275
|
+
I[\Output\] %% Reverse parallelogram: response
|
|
276
|
+
```
|
|
277
|
+
|
|
278
|
+
#### Edge Labels
|
|
279
|
+
|
|
280
|
+
```mermaid
|
|
281
|
+
flowchart TD
|
|
282
|
+
A{Authenticated?} -->|Yes| B[Dashboard]
|
|
283
|
+
A -->|No| C[Login Page]
|
|
284
|
+
D[API Call] -->|200 OK| E[Process Data]
|
|
285
|
+
D -->|4xx/5xx| F[Handle Error]
|
|
286
|
+
G[Submit] -->|Valid| H[Save]
|
|
287
|
+
G -->|Invalid| I[Show Errors]
|
|
288
|
+
```
|
|
289
|
+
|
|
290
|
+
#### Styling
|
|
291
|
+
|
|
292
|
+
Apply consistent colors to node types:
|
|
293
|
+
|
|
294
|
+
```mermaid
|
|
295
|
+
flowchart TD
|
|
296
|
+
A([Start]) --> B[Process]
|
|
297
|
+
B --> C{Decision}
|
|
298
|
+
C -->|Yes| D[(Save to DB)]
|
|
299
|
+
C -->|No| E[Handle Error]
|
|
300
|
+
D --> F([End])
|
|
301
|
+
E --> F
|
|
302
|
+
|
|
303
|
+
style A fill:#6366f1,color:#fff
|
|
304
|
+
style F fill:#6366f1,color:#fff
|
|
305
|
+
style C fill:#f59e0b,color:#000
|
|
306
|
+
style D fill:#10b981,color:#fff
|
|
307
|
+
style E fill:#ef4444,color:#fff
|
|
308
|
+
```
|
|
309
|
+
|
|
310
|
+
**Color convention:**
|
|
311
|
+
- `#6366f1` (indigo) — Start/End points
|
|
312
|
+
- `#10b981` (green) — Success paths, DB operations
|
|
313
|
+
- `#f59e0b` (amber) — Decision points
|
|
314
|
+
- `#ef4444` (red) — Error paths, failures
|
|
315
|
+
- `#8b5cf6` (purple) — External service calls
|
|
316
|
+
- `#3b82f6` (blue) — Processing steps
|
|
317
|
+
- Default (no style) — Regular steps
|
|
318
|
+
|
|
319
|
+
#### Subgraphs for Complex Flows
|
|
320
|
+
|
|
321
|
+
Use subgraphs to group related steps:
|
|
322
|
+
|
|
323
|
+
```mermaid
|
|
324
|
+
flowchart TD
|
|
325
|
+
A([Request]) --> B
|
|
326
|
+
|
|
327
|
+
subgraph Middleware
|
|
328
|
+
B[Auth Check] --> C[Rate Limit] --> D[Parse Body]
|
|
329
|
+
end
|
|
330
|
+
|
|
331
|
+
D --> E
|
|
332
|
+
|
|
333
|
+
subgraph Handler
|
|
334
|
+
E[Validate Input] --> F{Valid?}
|
|
335
|
+
F -->|Yes| G[Process]
|
|
336
|
+
F -->|No| H[Return 400]
|
|
337
|
+
end
|
|
338
|
+
|
|
339
|
+
G --> I[(Save)]
|
|
340
|
+
I --> J[\200 OK/]
|
|
341
|
+
H --> K[\400 Error/]
|
|
342
|
+
```
|
|
343
|
+
|
|
344
|
+
### 4.4 Complexity Guidelines
|
|
345
|
+
|
|
346
|
+
- **Simple flows** (3-8 nodes): Single linear or branching flow
|
|
347
|
+
- **Medium flows** (8-15 nodes): Multiple branches, some subgraphs
|
|
348
|
+
- **Complex flows** (15-25 nodes): Multiple subgraphs, parallel paths
|
|
349
|
+
- **Do NOT exceed 25 nodes** per diagram — split into multiple flows instead
|
|
350
|
+
|
|
351
|
+
If a flow is too complex:
|
|
352
|
+
1. Create a high-level overview flow
|
|
353
|
+
2. Create detailed sub-flows for each section
|
|
354
|
+
3. Reference sub-flows in the overview's description
|
|
355
|
+
|
|
356
|
+
### 4.5 Real-World Example
|
|
357
|
+
|
|
358
|
+
For a Next.js API route `app/api/auth/login/route.ts`:
|
|
359
|
+
|
|
360
|
+
````markdown
|
|
361
|
+
---
|
|
362
|
+
title: User Login
|
|
363
|
+
category: Authentication
|
|
364
|
+
tags: [auth, login, jwt, api]
|
|
365
|
+
order: 1
|
|
366
|
+
description: POST /api/auth/login — validates credentials and returns JWT tokens
|
|
367
|
+
---
|
|
368
|
+
|
|
369
|
+
```mermaid
|
|
370
|
+
flowchart TD
|
|
371
|
+
A([POST /api/auth/login]) --> B[/Parse Request Body/]
|
|
372
|
+
B --> C{{Validate Email & Password}}
|
|
373
|
+
C -->|Invalid| D[\400 Bad Request/]
|
|
374
|
+
C -->|Valid| E[(Find User by Email)]
|
|
375
|
+
E -->|Not Found| F[\401 Unauthorized/]
|
|
376
|
+
E -->|Found| G{{Compare Password Hash}}
|
|
377
|
+
G -->|Mismatch| F
|
|
378
|
+
G -->|Match| H[Generate JWT Access Token]
|
|
379
|
+
H --> I[Generate Refresh Token]
|
|
380
|
+
I --> J[(Save Refresh Token)]
|
|
381
|
+
J --> K[\200 OK + Tokens/]
|
|
382
|
+
|
|
383
|
+
style A fill:#6366f1,color:#fff
|
|
384
|
+
style C fill:#f59e0b,color:#000
|
|
385
|
+
style G fill:#f59e0b,color:#000
|
|
386
|
+
style E fill:#10b981,color:#fff
|
|
387
|
+
style J fill:#10b981,color:#fff
|
|
388
|
+
style D fill:#ef4444,color:#fff
|
|
389
|
+
style F fill:#ef4444,color:#fff
|
|
390
|
+
style K fill:#10b981,color:#fff
|
|
391
|
+
```
|
|
392
|
+
````
|
|
393
|
+
|
|
394
|
+
---
|
|
395
|
+
|
|
396
|
+
## Phase 5: Verification
|
|
397
|
+
|
|
398
|
+
### 5.1 Syntax Check
|
|
399
|
+
|
|
400
|
+
For each generated `.flow.md` file:
|
|
401
|
+
|
|
402
|
+
1. Verify YAML frontmatter is valid (title, category present)
|
|
403
|
+
2. Verify mermaid code block is properly fenced (``` mermaid ```)
|
|
404
|
+
3. Verify mermaid syntax has no obvious errors (matched brackets, valid node IDs)
|
|
405
|
+
|
|
406
|
+
### 5.2 Build Verification
|
|
407
|
+
|
|
408
|
+
```bash
|
|
409
|
+
npx flowbook build 2>&1
|
|
410
|
+
```
|
|
411
|
+
|
|
412
|
+
If build fails:
|
|
413
|
+
- Read error output
|
|
414
|
+
- Fix the issue (likely malformed mermaid syntax)
|
|
415
|
+
- Retry until build succeeds
|
|
416
|
+
|
|
417
|
+
### 5.3 Visual Verification
|
|
418
|
+
|
|
419
|
+
Start dev server and verify rendering:
|
|
420
|
+
|
|
421
|
+
```bash
|
|
422
|
+
npx flowbook dev &
|
|
423
|
+
FB_PID=$!
|
|
424
|
+
sleep 3
|
|
425
|
+
```
|
|
426
|
+
|
|
427
|
+
If the `playwright` skill is available, load it and:
|
|
428
|
+
|
|
429
|
+
1. Navigate to `http://localhost:6200`
|
|
430
|
+
2. Wait for Flowbook UI to load
|
|
431
|
+
3. Check sidebar — all flow categories should appear
|
|
432
|
+
4. Click through each flow — verify diagrams render (no error messages)
|
|
433
|
+
5. Screenshot any failures
|
|
434
|
+
|
|
435
|
+
```bash
|
|
436
|
+
kill $FB_PID 2>/dev/null
|
|
437
|
+
```
|
|
438
|
+
|
|
439
|
+
### 5.4 Fix-and-Retry Loop
|
|
440
|
+
|
|
441
|
+
If mermaid diagrams fail to render:
|
|
442
|
+
1. Common issue: special characters in labels — wrap in quotes: `A["Label with (parens)"]`
|
|
443
|
+
2. Common issue: reserved keywords — prefix with text: `A[End Point]` not `A[End]` alone as node content after using `End` as ID
|
|
444
|
+
3. Re-run build verification
|
|
445
|
+
4. Repeat until all diagrams render
|
|
446
|
+
|
|
447
|
+
---
|
|
448
|
+
|
|
449
|
+
## Phase 6: Summary Report
|
|
450
|
+
|
|
451
|
+
Print a summary:
|
|
452
|
+
|
|
453
|
+
```
|
|
454
|
+
=== Flowbook Report ===
|
|
455
|
+
Framework: {detected framework}
|
|
456
|
+
Language: {detected language}
|
|
457
|
+
|
|
458
|
+
Flows generated: {N}
|
|
459
|
+
Categories:
|
|
460
|
+
- Authentication: {N} flows
|
|
461
|
+
- API: {N} flows
|
|
462
|
+
- Data: {N} flows
|
|
463
|
+
- State: {N} flows
|
|
464
|
+
- Business Logic: {N} flows
|
|
465
|
+
- DevOps: {N} flows
|
|
466
|
+
|
|
467
|
+
Files created:
|
|
468
|
+
- flows/{filename}.flow.md — {title}
|
|
469
|
+
- flows/{filename}.flow.md — {title}
|
|
470
|
+
...
|
|
471
|
+
|
|
472
|
+
Build: ✅ / ❌
|
|
473
|
+
```
|
|
474
|
+
|
|
475
|
+
---
|
|
476
|
+
|
|
477
|
+
## Troubleshooting
|
|
478
|
+
|
|
479
|
+
### Flowbook init fails
|
|
480
|
+
- **No package.json**: Run `npm init -y` first
|
|
481
|
+
- **Permission error**: Check write permissions on project directory
|
|
482
|
+
|
|
483
|
+
### Mermaid syntax errors
|
|
484
|
+
- **Brackets**: Every `[`, `{`, `(` must be closed
|
|
485
|
+
- **Special characters in labels**: Wrap in double quotes: `A["User's Input"]`
|
|
486
|
+
- **Arrow syntax**: Use `-->` for solid, `-.->` for dotted, `==>` for thick
|
|
487
|
+
- **Node ID reuse**: Each node ID must be unique per diagram. Reuse ID to reference same node.
|
|
488
|
+
- **Subgraph naming**: Subgraph labels cannot contain special characters
|
|
489
|
+
|
|
490
|
+
### Diagrams too complex
|
|
491
|
+
- Split into overview + detail flows
|
|
492
|
+
- Use subgraphs to group related logic
|
|
493
|
+
- Keep each diagram under 25 nodes
|
|
494
|
+
- Link related flows via description references
|
|
495
|
+
|
|
496
|
+
### Build fails
|
|
497
|
+
- Check mermaid version compatibility (flowbook uses Mermaid 11+)
|
|
498
|
+
- Validate YAML frontmatter (no tabs, proper indentation)
|
|
499
|
+
- Ensure code blocks use triple backticks with `mermaid` language tag
|