flex-md 3.5.0 → 4.0.0
This diff represents the content of publicly available package versions that have been released to one of the supported registries. The information contained in this diff is provided for informational purposes only and reflects changes between package versions as they appear in their respective public registries.
- package/README.md +423 -39
- package/dist/index.cjs +62 -3
- package/dist/index.d.ts +1 -0
- package/dist/index.js +2 -0
- package/dist/ofs/parser.js +31 -10
- package/dist/tokens/auto-fix.d.ts +10 -0
- package/dist/tokens/auto-fix.js +56 -0
- package/dist/tokens/cognitive-cost.d.ts +10 -0
- package/dist/tokens/cognitive-cost.js +205 -0
- package/dist/tokens/compliance.d.ts +10 -0
- package/dist/tokens/compliance.js +70 -0
- package/dist/tokens/confidence.d.ts +6 -0
- package/dist/tokens/confidence.js +332 -0
- package/dist/tokens/estimator.d.ts +12 -0
- package/dist/tokens/estimator.js +138 -0
- package/dist/tokens/improvements.d.ts +10 -0
- package/dist/tokens/improvements.js +697 -0
- package/dist/tokens/index.d.ts +24 -0
- package/dist/tokens/index.js +31 -0
- package/dist/tokens/parser.d.ts +3 -0
- package/dist/tokens/parser.js +97 -0
- package/dist/tokens/patterns.d.ts +9 -0
- package/dist/tokens/patterns.js +20 -0
- package/dist/tokens/smart-report.d.ts +10 -0
- package/dist/tokens/smart-report.js +187 -0
- package/dist/tokens/spec-estimator.d.ts +7 -0
- package/dist/tokens/spec-estimator.js +68 -0
- package/dist/tokens/types.d.ts +185 -0
- package/dist/tokens/validator.d.ts +16 -0
- package/dist/tokens/validator.js +59 -0
- package/docs/Recommended New Strategies for AI Request Builder.md +691 -0
- package/package.json +5 -4
- package/dist/detection/detector.d.ts +0 -6
- package/dist/detection/detector.js +0 -104
- package/dist/detection/extractor.d.ts +0 -10
- package/dist/detection/extractor.js +0 -54
- package/dist/issues/build.d.ts +0 -26
- package/dist/issues/build.js +0 -62
- package/dist/md/lists.d.ts +0 -14
- package/dist/md/lists.js +0 -33
- package/dist/md/tables.d.ts +0 -25
- package/dist/md/tables.js +0 -72
- package/dist/ofs/extractor.d.ts +0 -9
- package/dist/ofs/extractor.js +0 -75
- package/dist/ofs/issues.d.ts +0 -14
- package/dist/ofs/issues.js +0 -92
- package/dist/ofs/validator.d.ts +0 -10
- package/dist/ofs/validator.js +0 -91
- package/dist/outline/builder.d.ts +0 -10
- package/dist/outline/builder.js +0 -85
- package/dist/outline/renderer.d.ts +0 -6
- package/dist/outline/renderer.js +0 -23
- package/dist/parser.d.ts +0 -2
- package/dist/parser.js +0 -199
- package/dist/parsers/lists.d.ts +0 -6
- package/dist/parsers/lists.js +0 -36
- package/dist/parsers/tables.d.ts +0 -10
- package/dist/parsers/tables.js +0 -58
- package/dist/stringify.d.ts +0 -2
- package/dist/stringify.js +0 -110
- package/dist/test-pipeline.js +0 -53
- package/dist/test-runner.d.ts +0 -1
- package/dist/test-runner.js +0 -331
- package/dist/test-strictness.d.ts +0 -1
- package/dist/test-strictness.js +0 -213
- package/dist/util.d.ts +0 -5
- package/dist/util.js +0 -64
- package/dist/validate/policy.d.ts +0 -10
- package/dist/validate/policy.js +0 -17
- package/dist/validator.d.ts +0 -2
- package/dist/validator.js +0 -80
- /package/dist/{test-pipeline.d.ts → tokens/types.js} +0 -0
package/dist/ofs/parser.js
CHANGED
|
@@ -96,36 +96,53 @@ export function parseOutputFormatSpec(md, opts = {}) {
|
|
|
96
96
|
const tables = [];
|
|
97
97
|
let emptySectionValue;
|
|
98
98
|
let inTables = false;
|
|
99
|
+
let currentSection = null;
|
|
99
100
|
for (const rawLine of block.split("\n")) {
|
|
100
101
|
const line = rawLine.trim();
|
|
101
102
|
if (/^tables\b/i.test(line)) {
|
|
102
103
|
inTables = true;
|
|
104
|
+
currentSection = null;
|
|
103
105
|
continue;
|
|
104
106
|
}
|
|
105
107
|
if (/^empty sections\b/i.test(line)) {
|
|
106
108
|
inTables = false;
|
|
109
|
+
currentSection = null;
|
|
107
110
|
continue;
|
|
108
111
|
}
|
|
109
112
|
// Empty section rule
|
|
110
113
|
const mNone = line.match(/write\s+`([^`]+)`/i);
|
|
111
114
|
if (/empty/i.test(line) && mNone) {
|
|
112
115
|
emptySectionValue = mNone[1];
|
|
116
|
+
currentSection = null;
|
|
113
117
|
continue;
|
|
114
118
|
}
|
|
115
119
|
// bullet items
|
|
116
120
|
const bullet = line.match(/^- (.+)$/);
|
|
117
|
-
if (
|
|
118
|
-
|
|
119
|
-
|
|
120
|
-
|
|
121
|
-
|
|
122
|
-
|
|
123
|
-
|
|
121
|
+
if (bullet) {
|
|
122
|
+
const item = bullet[1];
|
|
123
|
+
if (inTables) {
|
|
124
|
+
const t = parseTableDecl(item);
|
|
125
|
+
if (t)
|
|
126
|
+
tables.push(t);
|
|
127
|
+
currentSection = null;
|
|
128
|
+
}
|
|
129
|
+
else {
|
|
130
|
+
const s = parseSectionDecl(item, !!opts.allowDelimiterFallbacks);
|
|
131
|
+
if (s) {
|
|
132
|
+
sections.push(s);
|
|
133
|
+
currentSection = s;
|
|
134
|
+
}
|
|
135
|
+
else {
|
|
136
|
+
currentSection = null;
|
|
137
|
+
}
|
|
138
|
+
}
|
|
124
139
|
continue;
|
|
125
140
|
}
|
|
126
|
-
|
|
127
|
-
if (
|
|
128
|
-
|
|
141
|
+
// If not a bullet and we have a current section, it's an instruction
|
|
142
|
+
if (currentSection && line.length > 0) {
|
|
143
|
+
const existing = currentSection.instruction || "";
|
|
144
|
+
currentSection.instruction = existing ? `${existing} ${line}` : line;
|
|
145
|
+
}
|
|
129
146
|
}
|
|
130
147
|
if (!sections.length)
|
|
131
148
|
return null;
|
|
@@ -169,6 +186,10 @@ function normalizeSectionKind(rest) {
|
|
|
169
186
|
return "list";
|
|
170
187
|
if (r.includes("prose") || r.includes("text"))
|
|
171
188
|
return "text";
|
|
189
|
+
if (r.includes("ordered") && r.includes("table"))
|
|
190
|
+
return "ordered_table";
|
|
191
|
+
if (r.includes("table"))
|
|
192
|
+
return "table";
|
|
172
193
|
return null;
|
|
173
194
|
}
|
|
174
195
|
function parseTableDecl(item) {
|
|
@@ -0,0 +1,10 @@
|
|
|
1
|
+
import type { AutoFixResult, Improvement } from './types.js';
|
|
2
|
+
import type { OutputFormatSpec } from '../types.js';
|
|
3
|
+
/**
|
|
4
|
+
* Automatically apply fixable improvements
|
|
5
|
+
*/
|
|
6
|
+
export declare function autoFix(spec: OutputFormatSpec, improvements: Improvement[], options?: {
|
|
7
|
+
applyQuickWinsOnly?: boolean;
|
|
8
|
+
maxPriority?: Improvement['priority'];
|
|
9
|
+
skipManual?: boolean;
|
|
10
|
+
}): AutoFixResult;
|
|
@@ -0,0 +1,56 @@
|
|
|
1
|
+
/**
|
|
2
|
+
* Automatically apply fixable improvements
|
|
3
|
+
*/
|
|
4
|
+
export function autoFix(spec, improvements, options = {}) {
|
|
5
|
+
const { applyQuickWinsOnly = false, maxPriority = 'low', skipManual = true } = options;
|
|
6
|
+
const priorityOrder = { critical: 0, high: 1, medium: 2, low: 3 };
|
|
7
|
+
const maxPriorityLevel = priorityOrder[maxPriority] ?? 3;
|
|
8
|
+
const appliedFixes = [];
|
|
9
|
+
const skippedFixes = [];
|
|
10
|
+
const fixedSections = spec.sections.map(section => {
|
|
11
|
+
const sectionImprovements = improvements.filter(imp => imp.sectionName === section.name);
|
|
12
|
+
let currentInstruction = section.instruction;
|
|
13
|
+
let modified = false;
|
|
14
|
+
// Sort improvements by priority for this section
|
|
15
|
+
const sortedImps = [...sectionImprovements].sort((a, b) => (priorityOrder[a.priority] ?? 3) - (priorityOrder[b.priority] ?? 3));
|
|
16
|
+
for (const improvement of sortedImps) {
|
|
17
|
+
// Check if should apply
|
|
18
|
+
if ((priorityOrder[improvement.priority] ?? 3) > maxPriorityLevel)
|
|
19
|
+
continue;
|
|
20
|
+
if (applyQuickWinsOnly && improvement.effort !== 'trivial' && improvement.effort !== 'easy')
|
|
21
|
+
continue;
|
|
22
|
+
if (!improvement.autoFixable) {
|
|
23
|
+
skippedFixes.push({
|
|
24
|
+
sectionName: section.name,
|
|
25
|
+
reason: 'Requires manual review',
|
|
26
|
+
manualActionNeeded: improvement.suggestion
|
|
27
|
+
});
|
|
28
|
+
continue;
|
|
29
|
+
}
|
|
30
|
+
// Apply fix (only the first one for simplicity, or could chain)
|
|
31
|
+
// For now, we chain them by using the 'after' of the previous as 'before' of the next
|
|
32
|
+
// But 'before' in improvement object is relative to the ORIGINAL state.
|
|
33
|
+
// So we just apply the one with the highest priority for the section.
|
|
34
|
+
appliedFixes.push({
|
|
35
|
+
sectionName: section.name,
|
|
36
|
+
improvement: improvement.issue,
|
|
37
|
+
before: currentInstruction || '',
|
|
38
|
+
after: improvement.after
|
|
39
|
+
});
|
|
40
|
+
currentInstruction = improvement.after;
|
|
41
|
+
modified = true;
|
|
42
|
+
break; // Only apply one fix per section in this pass to avoid conflicts
|
|
43
|
+
}
|
|
44
|
+
return modified ? { ...section, instruction: currentInstruction } : section;
|
|
45
|
+
});
|
|
46
|
+
const summary = `Applied ${appliedFixes.length} fixes, skipped ${skippedFixes.length}`;
|
|
47
|
+
return {
|
|
48
|
+
fixed: {
|
|
49
|
+
...spec,
|
|
50
|
+
sections: fixedSections
|
|
51
|
+
},
|
|
52
|
+
appliedFixes,
|
|
53
|
+
skippedFixes,
|
|
54
|
+
summary
|
|
55
|
+
};
|
|
56
|
+
}
|
|
@@ -0,0 +1,10 @@
|
|
|
1
|
+
import type { CognitiveCost, LevelCostComparison } from './types.js';
|
|
2
|
+
import type { OutputFormatSpec } from '../types.js';
|
|
3
|
+
/**
|
|
4
|
+
* Calculate cognitive cost of creating/maintaining spec
|
|
5
|
+
*/
|
|
6
|
+
export declare function calculateCognitiveCost(spec: OutputFormatSpec): CognitiveCost;
|
|
7
|
+
/**
|
|
8
|
+
* Compare cognitive cost across different compliance levels
|
|
9
|
+
*/
|
|
10
|
+
export declare function compareLevelCosts(spec: OutputFormatSpec): LevelCostComparison;
|
|
@@ -0,0 +1,205 @@
|
|
|
1
|
+
import { parseSystemPart } from './parser.js';
|
|
2
|
+
import { detectSystemPartLevel } from './compliance.js';
|
|
3
|
+
/**
|
|
4
|
+
* Calculate cognitive cost of creating/maintaining spec
|
|
5
|
+
*/
|
|
6
|
+
export function calculateCognitiveCost(spec) {
|
|
7
|
+
const perSection = [];
|
|
8
|
+
let totalCost = 0;
|
|
9
|
+
let complexityCost = 0;
|
|
10
|
+
let decisionCost = 0;
|
|
11
|
+
for (const section of spec.sections) {
|
|
12
|
+
const sectionCost = calculateSectionCost(section);
|
|
13
|
+
perSection.push(sectionCost);
|
|
14
|
+
totalCost += sectionCost.cost;
|
|
15
|
+
// Track breakdown
|
|
16
|
+
complexityCost += getComplexityCost(section.kind || 'text');
|
|
17
|
+
decisionCost += getDecisionCost(sectionCost.level);
|
|
18
|
+
}
|
|
19
|
+
const baseCost = spec.sections.length * 1; // Base effort per section
|
|
20
|
+
return {
|
|
21
|
+
totalCost: Math.min(100, totalCost),
|
|
22
|
+
perSection,
|
|
23
|
+
breakdown: {
|
|
24
|
+
baseCost,
|
|
25
|
+
complexityCost,
|
|
26
|
+
decisionCost,
|
|
27
|
+
totalSections: spec.sections.length
|
|
28
|
+
},
|
|
29
|
+
recommendation: generateCostRecommendation(totalCost, spec.sections.length)
|
|
30
|
+
};
|
|
31
|
+
}
|
|
32
|
+
/**
|
|
33
|
+
* Calculate cost for individual section
|
|
34
|
+
*/
|
|
35
|
+
function calculateSectionCost(section) {
|
|
36
|
+
const kind = section.kind || 'text';
|
|
37
|
+
const systemPart = parseSystemPart(section.instruction, kind);
|
|
38
|
+
const level = systemPart ? detectSystemPartLevel(systemPart, kind) : null;
|
|
39
|
+
const factors = [];
|
|
40
|
+
let cost = 0;
|
|
41
|
+
// Base cost by level
|
|
42
|
+
const levelCosts = { 0: 0, 1: 1, 2: 3, 3: 5 };
|
|
43
|
+
const levelCost = levelCosts[level || 0];
|
|
44
|
+
cost += levelCost;
|
|
45
|
+
if (level !== null && level > 0) {
|
|
46
|
+
factors.push({
|
|
47
|
+
factor: 'system_part_level',
|
|
48
|
+
impact: levelCost,
|
|
49
|
+
description: `L${level} requires ${getLevelEffortDescription(level)}`
|
|
50
|
+
});
|
|
51
|
+
}
|
|
52
|
+
// Complexity by section kind
|
|
53
|
+
const kindCost = getComplexityCost(kind);
|
|
54
|
+
cost += kindCost;
|
|
55
|
+
if (kindCost > 0) {
|
|
56
|
+
factors.push({
|
|
57
|
+
factor: 'section_complexity',
|
|
58
|
+
impact: kindCost,
|
|
59
|
+
description: getKindComplexityDescription(kind)
|
|
60
|
+
});
|
|
61
|
+
}
|
|
62
|
+
// Additional cost for specific patterns
|
|
63
|
+
if (systemPart) {
|
|
64
|
+
const patternCost = getPatternCost(systemPart);
|
|
65
|
+
cost += patternCost.cost;
|
|
66
|
+
if (patternCost.cost > 0) {
|
|
67
|
+
factors.push({
|
|
68
|
+
factor: 'pattern_complexity',
|
|
69
|
+
impact: patternCost.cost,
|
|
70
|
+
description: patternCost.description
|
|
71
|
+
});
|
|
72
|
+
}
|
|
73
|
+
}
|
|
74
|
+
return {
|
|
75
|
+
sectionName: section.name,
|
|
76
|
+
cost,
|
|
77
|
+
level,
|
|
78
|
+
factors
|
|
79
|
+
};
|
|
80
|
+
}
|
|
81
|
+
function getLevelEffortDescription(level) {
|
|
82
|
+
const descriptions = {
|
|
83
|
+
0: 'no thinking',
|
|
84
|
+
1: 'picking from 4 simple options',
|
|
85
|
+
2: 'thinking about ranges',
|
|
86
|
+
3: 'considering minimums and approximations'
|
|
87
|
+
};
|
|
88
|
+
return descriptions[level];
|
|
89
|
+
}
|
|
90
|
+
function getComplexityCost(kind) {
|
|
91
|
+
const costs = {
|
|
92
|
+
'text': 0, // Simplest
|
|
93
|
+
'list': 1,
|
|
94
|
+
'ordered_list': 1,
|
|
95
|
+
'code': 1,
|
|
96
|
+
'table': 2, // Most complex (2 dimensions)
|
|
97
|
+
'ordered_table': 2
|
|
98
|
+
};
|
|
99
|
+
return costs[kind] || 0;
|
|
100
|
+
}
|
|
101
|
+
function getKindComplexityDescription(kind) {
|
|
102
|
+
const descriptions = {
|
|
103
|
+
'text': 'Simple single value',
|
|
104
|
+
'list': 'Need to estimate item count',
|
|
105
|
+
'ordered_list': 'Need to estimate item count',
|
|
106
|
+
'code': 'Need to estimate line count',
|
|
107
|
+
'table': 'Need to think about rows AND columns',
|
|
108
|
+
'ordered_table': 'Need to think about rows AND columns'
|
|
109
|
+
};
|
|
110
|
+
return descriptions[kind] || '';
|
|
111
|
+
}
|
|
112
|
+
function getDecisionCost(level) {
|
|
113
|
+
if (level === null)
|
|
114
|
+
return 0;
|
|
115
|
+
const costs = { 0: 0, 1: 0.5, 2: 1.5, 3: 2.5 };
|
|
116
|
+
return costs[level];
|
|
117
|
+
}
|
|
118
|
+
function getPatternCost(systemPart) {
|
|
119
|
+
const { parsed } = systemPart;
|
|
120
|
+
switch (parsed.type) {
|
|
121
|
+
case 'items':
|
|
122
|
+
case 'lines':
|
|
123
|
+
if (parsed.atLeast) {
|
|
124
|
+
return { cost: 1, description: 'Deciding "at least" minimum requires judgment' };
|
|
125
|
+
}
|
|
126
|
+
if (parsed.max !== null) {
|
|
127
|
+
return { cost: 0.5, description: 'Ranges require estimating both min and max' };
|
|
128
|
+
}
|
|
129
|
+
return { cost: 0, description: '' };
|
|
130
|
+
case 'table':
|
|
131
|
+
let tableCost = 0;
|
|
132
|
+
let desc = [];
|
|
133
|
+
if (parsed.rows.atLeast || parsed.columns.atLeast) {
|
|
134
|
+
tableCost += 1;
|
|
135
|
+
desc.push('minimums require judgment');
|
|
136
|
+
}
|
|
137
|
+
if (parsed.rows.max !== null || parsed.columns.max !== null) {
|
|
138
|
+
tableCost += 0.5;
|
|
139
|
+
desc.push('ranges require estimation');
|
|
140
|
+
}
|
|
141
|
+
return {
|
|
142
|
+
cost: tableCost,
|
|
143
|
+
description: desc.length > 0 ? `Two dimensions: ${desc.join(', ')}` : ''
|
|
144
|
+
};
|
|
145
|
+
default:
|
|
146
|
+
return { cost: 0, description: '' };
|
|
147
|
+
}
|
|
148
|
+
}
|
|
149
|
+
function generateCostRecommendation(totalCost, sectionCount) {
|
|
150
|
+
if (sectionCount === 0)
|
|
151
|
+
return 'Empty spec';
|
|
152
|
+
const avgCost = totalCost / sectionCount;
|
|
153
|
+
if (avgCost < 2) {
|
|
154
|
+
return 'Low cognitive load - easy to write and maintain';
|
|
155
|
+
}
|
|
156
|
+
else if (avgCost < 4) {
|
|
157
|
+
return 'Moderate cognitive load - reasonable effort required';
|
|
158
|
+
}
|
|
159
|
+
else if (avgCost < 6) {
|
|
160
|
+
return 'High cognitive load - consider simplifying some sections';
|
|
161
|
+
}
|
|
162
|
+
else {
|
|
163
|
+
return 'Very high cognitive load - strongly consider reducing to L2 or L1 for some sections';
|
|
164
|
+
}
|
|
165
|
+
}
|
|
166
|
+
/**
|
|
167
|
+
* Compare cognitive cost across different compliance levels
|
|
168
|
+
*/
|
|
169
|
+
export function compareLevelCosts(spec) {
|
|
170
|
+
const costs = { 0: 0, 1: 0, 2: 0, 3: 0 };
|
|
171
|
+
// Simulate cost at each level
|
|
172
|
+
for (let level = 0; level <= 3; level++) {
|
|
173
|
+
costs[level] = estimateCostAtLevel(spec, level);
|
|
174
|
+
}
|
|
175
|
+
return {
|
|
176
|
+
byLevel: costs,
|
|
177
|
+
recommendation: getBestLevelForCost(costs)
|
|
178
|
+
};
|
|
179
|
+
}
|
|
180
|
+
function estimateCostAtLevel(spec, level) {
|
|
181
|
+
const levelBaseCosts = { 0: 0, 1: 1, 2: 3, 3: 5 };
|
|
182
|
+
const baseCost = levelBaseCosts[level];
|
|
183
|
+
let total = spec.sections.length * baseCost;
|
|
184
|
+
// Add complexity cost
|
|
185
|
+
for (const section of spec.sections) {
|
|
186
|
+
total += getComplexityCost(section.kind || 'text');
|
|
187
|
+
total += getDecisionCost(level);
|
|
188
|
+
}
|
|
189
|
+
return total;
|
|
190
|
+
}
|
|
191
|
+
function getBestLevelForCost(costs) {
|
|
192
|
+
// L2 is usually the sweet spot
|
|
193
|
+
if (costs[2] < 50) {
|
|
194
|
+
return 'L2 recommended - good balance of precision and effort';
|
|
195
|
+
}
|
|
196
|
+
else if (costs[1] < 30) {
|
|
197
|
+
return 'L1 recommended - keep it simple for this spec';
|
|
198
|
+
}
|
|
199
|
+
else if (costs[3] < 70) {
|
|
200
|
+
return 'L3 acceptable - complexity is manageable';
|
|
201
|
+
}
|
|
202
|
+
else {
|
|
203
|
+
return 'Consider reducing spec size or using L1/L2';
|
|
204
|
+
}
|
|
205
|
+
}
|
|
@@ -0,0 +1,10 @@
|
|
|
1
|
+
import type { ComplianceLevel, ComplianceReport, SystemPart } from './types.js';
|
|
2
|
+
import type { OutputFormatSpec, SectionKind } from '../types.js';
|
|
3
|
+
/**
|
|
4
|
+
* Detect the compliance level of a system part
|
|
5
|
+
*/
|
|
6
|
+
export declare function detectSystemPartLevel(systemPart: SystemPart, kind: SectionKind | 'code'): ComplianceLevel;
|
|
7
|
+
/**
|
|
8
|
+
* Check if a spec complies with a target level
|
|
9
|
+
*/
|
|
10
|
+
export declare function checkSpecCompliance(spec: OutputFormatSpec, targetLevel?: ComplianceLevel): ComplianceReport;
|
|
@@ -0,0 +1,70 @@
|
|
|
1
|
+
import { parseSystemPart } from './parser.js';
|
|
2
|
+
/**
|
|
3
|
+
* Detect the compliance level of a system part
|
|
4
|
+
*/
|
|
5
|
+
export function detectSystemPartLevel(systemPart, kind) {
|
|
6
|
+
const { parsed } = systemPart;
|
|
7
|
+
switch (parsed.type) {
|
|
8
|
+
case 'length':
|
|
9
|
+
// Ranges in lengths are L2
|
|
10
|
+
if (['1-2 sentences', '2-3 paragraphs'].includes(parsed.value)) {
|
|
11
|
+
return 2;
|
|
12
|
+
}
|
|
13
|
+
return 1;
|
|
14
|
+
case 'items':
|
|
15
|
+
case 'lines':
|
|
16
|
+
if (parsed.atLeast || parsed.approximate)
|
|
17
|
+
return 3;
|
|
18
|
+
if (parsed.max !== null)
|
|
19
|
+
return 2;
|
|
20
|
+
return 1;
|
|
21
|
+
case 'table':
|
|
22
|
+
if (parsed.rows.atLeast || parsed.columns.atLeast)
|
|
23
|
+
return 3;
|
|
24
|
+
if (parsed.rows.max !== null || parsed.columns.max !== null)
|
|
25
|
+
return 2;
|
|
26
|
+
return 1;
|
|
27
|
+
default:
|
|
28
|
+
return 0;
|
|
29
|
+
}
|
|
30
|
+
}
|
|
31
|
+
/**
|
|
32
|
+
* Check if a spec complies with a target level
|
|
33
|
+
*/
|
|
34
|
+
export function checkSpecCompliance(spec, targetLevel = 2) {
|
|
35
|
+
const violations = [];
|
|
36
|
+
let totalLevel = 0;
|
|
37
|
+
let compliantCount = 0;
|
|
38
|
+
for (const section of spec.sections) {
|
|
39
|
+
const kind = section.kind || 'text';
|
|
40
|
+
const systemPart = parseSystemPart(section.instruction, kind);
|
|
41
|
+
const level = systemPart ? detectSystemPartLevel(systemPart, kind) : 0;
|
|
42
|
+
totalLevel += level;
|
|
43
|
+
if (level >= targetLevel) {
|
|
44
|
+
compliantCount++;
|
|
45
|
+
}
|
|
46
|
+
else if (section.required !== false) {
|
|
47
|
+
violations.push({
|
|
48
|
+
sectionName: section.name,
|
|
49
|
+
kind,
|
|
50
|
+
level,
|
|
51
|
+
message: `Section '${section.name}' is at L${level}, but target is L${targetLevel}`
|
|
52
|
+
});
|
|
53
|
+
}
|
|
54
|
+
else {
|
|
55
|
+
// Optional sections don't cause violations but we still count them if they are compliant
|
|
56
|
+
if (level >= targetLevel)
|
|
57
|
+
compliantCount++;
|
|
58
|
+
}
|
|
59
|
+
}
|
|
60
|
+
return {
|
|
61
|
+
compliant: violations.length === 0,
|
|
62
|
+
level: targetLevel,
|
|
63
|
+
violations,
|
|
64
|
+
summary: {
|
|
65
|
+
totalSections: spec.sections.length,
|
|
66
|
+
compliantSections: compliantCount,
|
|
67
|
+
averageLevel: spec.sections.length > 0 ? totalLevel / spec.sections.length : 0
|
|
68
|
+
}
|
|
69
|
+
};
|
|
70
|
+
}
|